Social License and Animal Welfare: Developments from the Past Decade in Australia
Abstract
:Simple Summary
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Background
3. Animal Welfare in Modern Australia
4. Australian Animal Industries Having Experienced Recent Erosion of Social License
4.1. Live Export of Sheep and Cattle
4.2. Greyhound Racing
4.3. Commercial Kangaroo Harvesting
4.4. Horse Racing
4.5. Dairy Farming
4.6. Sheep Farming
5. Why Have Some Australian Industries Experienced an Erosion of SLO?
5.1. Interaction with Science
5.2. Stakeholder Engagement
5.3. Transparency
5.4. Public Relations
5.5. The Role of Media
6. Solutions and Challenges
7. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Coleman, G. Public animal welfare discussions and outlooks in Australia. Anim. Front. 2018, 8, 14–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Sinclair, M.; Derkley, T.; Fryer, C.; Phillips, C.J. Australian public opinions regarding the live export trade before and after an animal welfare media exposé. Animals 2018, 8, 106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Schoenmaker, S.; Alexander, D. Live cattle trade-the case of an online crisis. Soc. Altern. 2012, 31, 17–21. [Google Scholar]
- Markwell, K.; Firth, T.; Hing, N. Blood on the race track: An analysis of ethical concerns regarding animal-based gambling. Ann. Leis. Res. 2017, 20, 594–609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- McHugh, M. Special Commission of Inquiry into the Greyhound Racing Industry in New South Wales; New South Wales Department of Justice: Sydney, Australia, 2016.
- Brueckner, M.; Eabrasu, M. Pinning down the social license to operate (SLO): The problem of normative complexity. Resour. Policy 2018, 59, 217–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Owen, J.R.; Kemp, D. Social licence and mining: A critical perspective. Resour.Policy 2013, 38, 29–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hall, N.; Lacey, J.; Carr-Cornish, S.; Dowd, A.-M. Social licence to operate: Understanding how a concept has been translated into practice in energy industries. J. Clean. Prod. 2015, 86, 301–310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cullen-Knox, C.; Haward, M.; Jabour, J.; Ogier, E.; Tracey, S.R. The social licence to operate and its role in marine governance: Insights from Australia. Mar. Policy 2017, 79, 70–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lester, L. Media and social licence: On being publicly useful in the Tasmanian forests conflict. For. Int. J. For. Res. 2016, 89, 542–551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Robbins, J.; Franks, B.; Weary, D.; Von Keyserlingk, M. Awareness of ag-gag laws erodes trust in farmers and increases support for animal welfare regulations. Food Policy 2016, 61, 121–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hampton, J.O.; Teh-White, K. Animal welfare, social license and wildlife use industries. J. Wildl. Manag. 2018, 83, 12–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Heleski, C.; Stowe, C.J.; Fiedler, J.; Peterson, M.L.; Brady, C.; Wickens, C.; MacLeod, J.N. Thoroughbred racehorse welfare through the lens of ‘social license to operate’—With an emphasis on a US perspective. Sustainability 2020, 12, 1706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Sayers, J. The influence of animal welfare accreditation programmes on zoo visitor perceptions of the welfare of zoo animals. J. Zoo Aquar. Res. 2020, 8, 188–193. [Google Scholar]
- Darimont, C.T.; Hall, H.; Eckert, L.; Mihalik, I.; Artelle, K.; Treves, A.; Paquet, P.C. Large carnivore hunting and the social license to hunt. Conserv. Biol. 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Johnson, C.; Woinarski, J.; Cooney, R. Bans on kangaroo products are a case of emotion trumping science. The Conversation, 5 October 2015. [Google Scholar]
- Mkono, M. The age of digital activism in tourism: Evaluating the legacy and limitations of the Cecil anti-trophy hunting movement. J. Sustain. Tour. 2018, 26, 1608–1624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Spivey, D. Conservation force et al. v. Delta Air Lines: The legality of an airline ban on big game hunting trophies. DePaul J. Sports Law Contemp. Probl. 2016, 12, 108–133. [Google Scholar]
- Broom, D.M. Animal welfare: Concepts and measurement. J. Anim. Sci. 1991, 69, 4167–4175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Buddle, E.A.; Bray, H.J. How farm animal welfare issues are framed in the Australian media. J. Agric. Environ. Ethics 2019, 32, 357–376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hampton, J.O.; Jones, B.; Perry, A.L.; Miller, C.J.; Hart, Q. Integrating animal welfare into wild herbivore management: Lessons from the Australian Feral Camel Management Project. Rangel. J. 2016, 38, 163–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Freire, R.; Phillips, C.J.; Verrinder, J.M.; Collins, T.; Degeling, C.; Fawcett, A.; Fisher, A.D.; Hazel, S.; Hood, J.; Johnson, J. The importance of animal welfare science and ethics to veterinary students in Australia and New Zealand. J. Vet. Med. Educ. 2017, 44, 208–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Morton, R.; Hebart, M.L.; Whittaker, A.L. Increasing maximum penalties for animal welfare offences in South Australia—Has it caused penal change? Animals 2018, 8, 236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Hampton, J.O.; Warburton, B.; Sandøe, P. Compassionate versus consequentialist conservation. Conserv. Biol. 2019, 33, 751–759. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Rollin, B.E. Animal rights as a mainstream phenomenon. Animals 2011, 1, 102–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Wallach, A.D.; Bekoff, M.; Batavia, C.; Nelson, M.P.; Ramp, D. Summoning compassion to address the challenges of conservation. Conserv. Biol. 2018, 32, 1255–1265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Munro, L. Strategies, action repertoires and DIY activism in the animal rights movement. Soc. Mov. Stud. 2005, 4, 75–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pendergrast, N. The vegan shift in the Australian animal movement. Int. J. Sociol. Soc. Policy 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fleming, P.A.; Clarke, T.; Wickham, S.L.; Stockman, C.A.; Barnes, A.L.; Collins, T.; Miller, D.W. The contribution of qualitative behavioural assessment to appraisal of livestock welfare. Anim. Prod. Sci. 2016, 56, 1569–1578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Tiplady, C.M.; Walsh, D.-A.B.; Phillips, C.J. Public response to media coverage of animal cruelty. J. Agric. Environ. Ethics 2013, 26, 869–885. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Richards, R.; Norris, R.; Dunlop, R.; McQuade, N. Causes of death in sheep exported live by sea. Aust. Vet. J. 1989, 66, 33–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Schipp, M. The welfare of livestock transported by sea: Australia’s experience. Vet. J. 2013, 3, 282–283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dunston-Clarke, E.; Willis, R.S.; Fleming, P.A.; Barnes, A.L.; Miller, D.W.; Collins, T. Developing an animal welfare assessment protocol for livestock transported by sea. Animals 2020, 10, 705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Navarro, G.; Col, R.; Phillips, C.J. Effects of doubling the standard space allowance on behavioural and physiological responses of sheep experiencing regular and irregular floor motion during simulated sea transport. Animals 2020, 10, 476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Collins, T.; Hampton, J.O.; Barnes, A.L. A systematic review of heat load in Australian livestock transported by sea. Animals 2018, 8, 164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Pendergrast, N. Live animal export, humane slaughter and media hegemony. Anim. Stud. J. 2015, 4, 99–125. [Google Scholar]
- Pines, M.; Petherick, J.; Gaughan, J.; Phillips, C. Stakeholders' assessment of welfare indicators for sheep and cattle exported by sea from Australia. Anim. Welf. 2007, 16, 489–498. [Google Scholar]
- Rice, M.; Hemsworth, L.M.; Hemsworth, P.H.; Coleman, G.J. The impact of a negative media event on public attitudes towards animal welfare in the red meat industry. Animals 2020, 10, 619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Hastreiter, M.T. Animal welfare standards and Australia's live exports industry to Indonesia: Creating an opportunity out of a crisis. Wash. Univ. Glob. Stud. Law Rev. 2013, 12, 181–203. [Google Scholar]
- McCarthy, M. Independent Review of Conditions for the Export of Sheep to the Middle East during the Northern Hemisphere Summer; The Office of the Minister for Agriculture and Water Resources: Canberra, Australia, 2018. [Google Scholar]
- Smith, A. Collective Advocates for Livestock Industry. Available online: https://www.farmweekly.com.au/story/6886249/collective-advocates-for-livestock-industry/ (accessed on 28 November 2020).
- Fleming, P.A.; Wickham, S.L.; Barnes, A.L.; Miller, D.W.; Collins, T. Varying opinions about animal welfare in the Australian live export industry: A survey. Animals 2020, 10, 1864. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Teh-White, K. Greyhounds increase social licence risk. Int. Anim. Health J. 2017, 4, 26–29. [Google Scholar]
- Duncan, E.; Graham, R.; McManus, P. ‘No one has even seen… smelt… or sensed a social licence’: Animal geographies and social licence to operate. Geoforum 2018, 96, 318–327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- McEwan, A.; Skandakumar, K. The welfare of greyhounds in Australian racing: Has the industry run its course? Aust. Anim. Prot. Law J. 2011, 6, 52–74. [Google Scholar]
- Sicard, G.; Short, K.; Manley, P. A survey of injuries at five greyhound racing tracks. J. Small Anim. Pract. 1999, 40, 428–432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Thomas, J.; Adams, N.; Farnworth, M. Characteristics of ex-racing greyhounds in New Zealand and their impact on re-homing. Anim. Welf. 2017, 26, 345–354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Atkinson, M.; Young, K. Reservoir dogs: Greyhound racing, mimesis and sports-related violence. Int. Rev. Sociol. Sport 2005, 40, 335–356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ramp, D. Bringing compassion to the ethical dilemma in killing kangaroos for conservation. J. Bioethical. Inq. 2013, 10, 267–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- McIntyre, K.C.; McIntyre, M. Kangaroo: A Love-Hate Story; Hopping Pictures: Sydney, Australia, 2017. [Google Scholar]
- York, C.; Bale, R. Australians hunt kangaroos commercially. Does it make sense? National Geographic, 21 November 2017. [Google Scholar]
- McLeod, S.R.; Sharp, T. The Australian Kangaroo Industry: Male-Only Harvesting, Sustainability and an Assessment of Animal Welfare Impacts; AgriFutures Australia: Wagga Wagga, Australia, 2020. [Google Scholar]
- Descovich, K.; McDonald, I.; Tribe, A.; Phillips, C. A welfare assessment of methods used for harvesting, hunting and population control of kangaroos and wallabies. Anim. Welf. 2015, 24, 255–265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hampton, J.O. Gunpowder-powered captive bolts for the euthanasia of kangaroo pouch young. Aust. Mammal. 2019, 41, 250–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sharp, T.; McLeod, S. Kangaroo harvesters and the euthanasia of orphaned young-at-foot: Applying the theory of planned behaviour to an animal welfare issue. Anim. Welf. 2016, 25, 39–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Boom, K.; Ben-Ami, D.; Boronyak, L.; Riley, S. The role of inspections in the commercial kangaroo industry. Int. J. Rural. Law Policy 2013, 1–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Wilson, G.R.; Edwards, M. Professional kangaroo population control leads to better animal welfare, conservation outcomes and avoids waste. Aust. Zool. 2019, 40, 181–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- McGreevy, P.; McManus, P. Why horse-racing in Australia needs a social licence to operate. The Conversation, 3 November 2017. [Google Scholar]
- Williams, R.; Harkins, L.; Hammond, C.; Wood, J. Racehorse injuries, clinical problems and fatalities recorded on British racecourses from flat racing and National Hunt racing during 1996, 1997 and 1998. Equine Vet. J. 2001, 33, 478–486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Thomson, P.; Hayek, A.; Jones, B.; Evans, D.; McGreevy, P. Number, causes and destinations of horses leaving the Australian Thoroughbred and Standardbred racing industries. Aust. Vet. J. 2014, 92, 303–311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- McGreevy, P. Equine Behavior: A Guide for Veterinarians and Equine Scientists; Elsevier Health Sciences: Edinburgh, Scotland, 2012. [Google Scholar]
- Begg, L.; O’sullivan, C. The prevalence and distribution of gastric ulceration in 345 racehorses. Aust. Vet. J. 2003, 81, 199–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Jones, B.; Goodfellow, J.; Yeates, J.; McGreevy, P.D. A critical analysis of the British Horseracing Authority’s review of the use of the whip in horseracing. Animals 2015, 5, 138–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Barakzai, S.; Finnegan, C.; Boden, L. Effect of ‘tongue tie’ use on racing performance of Thoroughbreds in the United Kingdom. Equine Vet. J. 2009, 41, 812–816. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Thomas, G.; Jordaan, P. Pre-slaughter mortality and post-slaughter wastage in bobby veal calves at a slaughter premises in New Zealand. N. Z. Vet. J. 2013, 61, 127–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Flower, F.; Weary, D. The effects of early separation on the dairy cow and calf. Anim. Welf. 2003, 12, 339–348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- O’Callaghan, K.; Cripps, P.; Downham, D.; Murray, R. Subjective and objective assessment of pain and discomfort due to lameness in dairy cattle. Anim. Welf. 2003, 12, 605–610. [Google Scholar]
- Faulkner, P.; Weary, D. Reducing pain after dehorning in dairy calves. J. Dairy Sci. 2000, 83, 2037–2041. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Clay, N.; Garnett, T.; Lorimer, J. Dairy intensification: Drivers, impacts and alternatives. Ambio 2020, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Jongman, E.C.; Butler, K.L. The effect of age, stocking density and flooring during transport on welfare of young dairy calves in Australia. Animals 2014, 4, 184–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Krueger, A.; Cruickshank, J.; Trevisi, E.; Bionaz, M. Systems for evaluation of welfare on dairy farms. J. Dairy Res. 2020, 87, 13–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Webster, J.; Stewart, M.; Rogers, A.; Verkerk, G. Assessment of welfare from physiological and behavioural responses of New Zealand dairy cows exposed to cold and wet conditions. Anim. Welf. 2008, 17, 19–26. [Google Scholar]
- Oltenacu, P.A.; Broom, D.M. The impact of genetic selection for increased milk yield on the welfare of dairy cows. Anim. Welf. 2010, 19, 39–49. [Google Scholar]
- Lee, C.; Fisher, A. Welfare consequences of mulesing of sheep. Aust. Vet. J. 2007, 85, 89–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wells, A.E.; Sneddon, J.; Lee, J.A.; Blache, D. Farmer’s response to societal concerns about farm animal welfare: The case of mulesing. J. Agric. Environ. Ethics 2011, 24, 645–658. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fraser, D. Understanding animal welfare. Acta Vet. Scand. 2008, 50, S1–S7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Blokhuis, H.; Jones, R.; Geers, R.; Miele, M.; Veissier, I. Measuring and monitoring animal welfare: Transparency in the food product quality chain. Anim. Welf. 2003, 12, 445–456. [Google Scholar]
- Gellatley, J.; Wardle, T. The Silent Ark: A Chilling Exposé of Meat-the Global Killer; Thorsons: London, UK, 1996. [Google Scholar]
- Hampton, J.O.; Hyndman, T.H.; Laurence, M.; Perry, A.L.; Adams, P.; Collins, T. Animal welfare and the use of procedural documents: Limitations and refinement. Wildl. Res. 2016, 43, 599–603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Arnot, C.; Vizzier-Thaxton, Y.; Scanes, C.G. Values, trust and science–building trust in today's food system in an era of radical transparency. Poult. Sci. 2016, 95, 2219–2224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hampton, J.O.; Fisher, P.M.; Warburton, B. Reconsidering humaneness. Conserv. Biol. 2020, 34, 1107–1113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Foster, S.F.; Overall, K.L. The welfare of Australian livestock transported by sea. Vet. J. 2014, 200, 205–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Fernandez, E.J.; Timberlake, W. Mutual benefits of research collaborations between zoos and academic institutions. Zoo Biol. 2008, 27, 470–487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Anonymous. Regulation of Australian Agriculture: Inquiry Report; Australian Government Productivity Commission: Canberra, Australia, 2016.
- Colonius, T.J.; Earley, R.W. One welfare: A call to develop a broader framework of thought and action. J. Am. Vet. Med Assoc. 2013, 242, 309–310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Stanford, K.; Sexton, B. On-farm carcass disposal options for dairies. WCDS Adv. Dairy Technol. 2006, 18, 295–302. [Google Scholar]
- Hall, N.L. Can the “social licence to operate” concept enhance engagement and increase acceptance of renewable energy? A case study of wind farms in Australia. Soc. Epistemol. 2014, 28, 219–238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Urbanek, R.E.; Nielsen, C.K.; Davenport, M.A.; Woodson, B.D. Perceived and desired outcomes of suburban deer management methods. J. Wildl. Manag. 2015, 79, 647–661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Hampton, J.O.; Jones, B.; McGreevy, P.D. Social License and Animal Welfare: Developments from the Past Decade in Australia. Animals 2020, 10, 2237. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani10122237
Hampton JO, Jones B, McGreevy PD. Social License and Animal Welfare: Developments from the Past Decade in Australia. Animals. 2020; 10(12):2237. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani10122237
Chicago/Turabian StyleHampton, Jordan O., Bidda Jones, and Paul D. McGreevy. 2020. "Social License and Animal Welfare: Developments from the Past Decade in Australia" Animals 10, no. 12: 2237. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani10122237
APA StyleHampton, J. O., Jones, B., & McGreevy, P. D. (2020). Social License and Animal Welfare: Developments from the Past Decade in Australia. Animals, 10(12), 2237. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani10122237