Next Article in Journal
Modulating Chitinase in the QS Biosensor Strain CV026: Do Not Forget to Release Carbon Catabolite Repression. Comment on Deryabin et al. Quorum Sensing in Chromobacterium subtsugae ATCC 31532 (Formerly Chromobacterium violaceum ATCC 31532): Transcriptomic and Genomic Analyses. Microorganisms 2025, 13, 1021
Next Article in Special Issue
Mycobacterium Transcriptional Factor BlaI Regulates Cell Division and Growth and Potentiates β-Lactam Antibiotic Efficacy Against Mycobacteria
Previous Article in Journal
Correction: Khayyat et al. Xylitol Inhibits Growth and Blocks Virulence in Serratia marcescens. Microorganisms 2021, 9, 1083
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Challenges and Potential of Antibody–Drug Conjugates as Prospective Tuberculosis Therapeutics

by
Kenneth W. Foreman
1 and
Hui-Chen Foreman
2,*
1
Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, George Mason University, Fairfax, VA 22030, USA
2
Mercy LLC, Roswell, GA 30076, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Microorganisms 2025, 13(10), 2234; https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms13102234
Submission received: 28 August 2025 / Revised: 22 September 2025 / Accepted: 23 September 2025 / Published: 24 September 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Mycobacterial Research)

Abstract

Tuberculosis (TB), primarily caused by Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb), remains a leading cause of infectious disease mortality worldwide. Global TB control efforts face several hurdles, including the lack of a broadly effective vaccine, limited sensitivity of current diagnostics, particularly for paucibacillary and extrapulmonary TB, and significant adverse effects associated with prolonged small-molecule drug regimens. The growing prevalence of multidrug-resistant (MDR) and extensively drug-resistant (XDR) strains further underscores the urgent need for innovative therapeutic strategies. We outline characteristics of next-generation TB therapeutics. We show that antibody (Ab)-drug conjugates (ADCs) satisfy many of those desirable characteristics. Since a major hurdle to this approach lies in Mtb-specific Abs, we highlight an open-access resource comprising a broad panel of Mtb-specific mouse monoclonal antibodies targeting key factors involved in Mtb survival, immune evasion, and pathogenesis. These critical Mtb virulence factors include heat shock proteins (GroES, DnaK, and HspX), surface-associated or secreted proteins (LAM, Ag85, HBHA, Mpt64/CFP-21, and PhoS1/PstS1), cell wall/envelope-associated proteins (LprG/p27), and detoxifying enzymes (KatG and SodA). The resource provides full-length sequences of the immunoglobulin variable regions, enabling antibody engineering and facilitating translational TB research across vaccine design, diagnostic development, and immunotherapeutic applications, in addition to ADCs. This ADC targeted delivery strategy holds promise for overcoming TB heterogeneity and eliminating both active and dormant Mtb populations within a single therapeutic formulation and offers a novel avenue for precision TB treatment.

1. Introduction

Tuberculosis (TB), a chronic infectious disease, ranks among the leading causes of infectious disease-related mortality and morbidity in human history [1,2,3]. TB, a respiratory disease transmitted via aerosol, disproportionately affects resource-limited and densely populated regions like South-East Asia and Africa [4,5]. Although the World Health Organization (WHO) has designated TB as a critical global health priority, the disease still affects more than 2 billion individuals worldwide [6,7].
Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb), among the members of the Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex (MTBC), is the primary etiological agent of human TB [3,8]. Mtb is transmitted via aerosolized droplets and establishes infection in the lungs following phagocytosis by alveolar macrophages [9,10,11]. Mtb inhibits phagosome–lysosome fusion and maturation, thereby evading macrophage-mediated inactivation/degradation [10,11,12]. Mtb pathogenesis centers around its ability to survive and persist within these immature phagosomes [10,11]. Consequently, macrophages, rather than clearing the pathogen, become a reservoir for Mtb persistence [10].
The pathogenesis of TB is highly complex, shaped by dynamic interactions between host immune responses and pathogen-driven mechanisms [13]. Hosts, once infected, inherently struggle to clear Mtb. Mtb triggers an acute immune response during primary infection, reinfection, or reactivation that frequently transitions into a latent, chronic, or persistent state, from which reactivation may subsequently occur [3,13,14,15]. Although pulmonary TB is the most prevalent form, disseminated or extrapulmonary TB can involve lymph nodes, bones, or multiple organs [16]. The diverse and heterogeneous clinical manifestations [7,17] of TB complicate timely, sensitive, accurate diagnosis and thereby effective intervention [18].
Current TB intervention relies predominantly on combination therapies involving small-molecule antibiotics (SMDs) [19,20,21]. Typically, TB treatment schedules last for months, increasing the risk of considerable adverse effects [22]. Standard therapy for drug-sensitive TB includes four drugs: rifampin, isoniazid, pyrazinamide, and ethambutol for two months (the intensive phase), followed by rifampin and isoniazid for an additional four months (the continuation phase) [20,21,23,24]. Under specific conditions, a shorter four-month regimen employs rifapentine and moxifloxacin [19,24]. Treatment of MDR TB involves more complex regimens, such as the BPaL combination—bedaquiline (B), pretomanid (Pa), and linezolid (L)—administered for at least six months [19,25,26,27]. However, linezolid treatment features severe adverse effects, including hematologic toxicity, peripheral neuropathy, myelosuppression, and optic neuritis [26].
Mtb antibiotic recalcitrance arises from its slow growth rate, high adaptive resistance, phenotypic plasticity, and capacity to form biofilms, necessitating prolonged therapeutic regimens [14,28]. Within granulomas, Mtb can transition into a metabolically dormant, non-replicating state that enables long-term persistence [3,29]. This dormant phenotype renders conventional antibiotics largely ineffective, as most antimicrobials target actively dividing bacteria [29,30]. The limited repertoire of effective SMDs against the dormant phenotype represents a growing threat, particularly in the face of the global emergence of MDR-TB and XDR-TB strains [7].
Latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) presents distinct challenges for disease control [3,31,32]. Reactivation of LTBI can account for more than 80% of active TB (ATB) cases in low-incidence countries [7,17,32]. Currently, any one of three treatment regimens is recommended for LTBI management [33]: (1) 3 months of once-weekly isoniazid plus rifapentine (3HP), (2) 4 months of daily rifampin (4R), and (3) 3 months of daily isoniazid plus rifampin (3HR). Although shorter and more tolerable than traditional six- to nine-month therapies, these regimens remain impractical for large-scale implementation, particularly in resource-limited settings, and fail as a stand-alone strategy for effective epidemic control.
TB prevention remains limited, as natural infection does not generate durable, protective immunity [11]. Moreover, the century-old Bacillus Calmette–Guérin (BCG) vaccine, the only current long-term preventive vaccine for TB, offers limited and variable protection, particularly in adults [11,13,34]. Most TB vaccine candidates remain in investigational stages of development [10,11,35,36]. The limited therapeutic arsenal currently available highlights the urgent need for intensified research and development for TB control.
Effective TB control requires an integrated approach involving improved diagnostic accuracy, expanded therapeutic options, and effective preventive strategies. Antibodies (Abs) have long served as essential tools in combating infectious diseases, contributing significantly to both therapeutic interventions and diagnostic innovations [37,38,39,40]. They exhibit multimodal functionality: the variable region (Fab or immunoglobulin variable [IgV] domain) mediates antigen (Ag) recognition, while the constant region (Fc) facilitates immune effector functions such as complement activation and engagement with Fc receptors on immune cells [41].
In this review, we highlight the critical features of next-generation TB therapeutics and a lesser-discussed yet promising therapeutic strategy: Mycobacterium tuberculosis-specific antibody–drug conjugates (MtbADCs). While this possibility was considered quite speculatively more than a decade ago, many new developments, particularly around Ab resources, warrant a deeper dive [42]. We discuss how MtbADCs fulfill many of the requirements of a next-generation TB therapeutic. Additionally, we discuss some of the issues that must be overcome for the successful implementation of this strategy, including proper Ab identification. An open-access antibody resource [43] is highlighted for its relatively recent verification of a broad panel of Mtb-specific monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) with functional IgV sequences. These Abs target key virulence factors, including surface antigens, important for Mtb survival and pathogenesis. We conclude with possible basic and translational research avenues enabled by the antibody resource.

2. Critical Features of Next-Generation TB Therapeutics

To elicit effective killing, local drug concentration at the site of infection and the bactericidal potency over time is crucial. Currently, targeted intervention strategies against Mtb remain limited. Next-generation TB therapeutics should demonstrate at least one of the following features:
  • TB drugs should maintain robust bactericidal activity across diverse metabolic states, including Mtb variants with phenotypic heterogeneity and adaptive resistance.
  • TB drugs must overcome the pharmacokinetic (PK) barriers of passive diffusion in reaching tissue or cellular barriers, e.g., granuloma and intracellular compartmentation.
  • TB drugs must act as a potent, pan-TB regimen with improved pharmacodynamic (PD) and PK profiles relative to current therapeutics.
  • Increased efficacy translates into regimens with shorter treatment duration relative to current therapeutics.
  • TB drug regimens would preferably employ a single-agent therapy. Such simplification should improve patient adherence and enhance the operational feasibility of large-scale implementation in global public health programs.

3. Rationale for MtbADCs

ADCs comprise the following components (Figure 1A) [44,45,46]:
  • Payload: the bioactive agent or agents responsible for the therapeutic effect.
  • Ab: a targeting moiety for precise delivery and a biodegradable carrier for the therapeutic payload.
  • Linker: a chemical entity that covalently attaches the payload to the Ab, ensuring stability during circulation and controlled release primarily at the target site.
Rationally engineered MtbADCs can satisfy the requirements for next-generation TB therapeutics. Figure 1B,C illustrates the MtbADC conceptual framework.

3.1. MtbADCs’ Potential for Robust Bactericidal Activity

ADC targeted approaches have successfully treated intracellular infections, delivering antimicrobial agents directly into otherwise inaccessible compartments [47]. For instance, recent studies employing ADC-based antibiotic delivery against phagosome-resident methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) showed substantial efficacy [48,49,50]. This “baiting” strategy, whereby cytotoxic or antimicrobial agents are actively directed into intracellular niches, appears feasible.
Ab–Ag binding is largely independent of pathogen metabolic state or intracellular localization, provided the ADC can access the target antigen. Therefore, Abs that target surface-exposed Mtb antigens conserved and consistently expressed across diverse infection states and phenotypic variants or that target inflammatory markers on macrophages could form the basis of broad-spectrum ADCs (Figure 1B). Once delivered to the Mtb, the ADC payload will have the opportunity to kill effectively due to the concentration enhancement at the point of infection (Figure 1C).

3.2. MtbADCs’ Potential to Overcome Passive Diffusion Limitations

Systemic passive diffusion affects the tissue distribution of traditional SMD therapies [51]. Necrotic and structurally complex tissues, such as TB granulomas, feature markedly inefficient passive diffusion to the therapeutic target [52,53,54]. TB granulomas can have highly organized structures with a complex microenvironment, including a central necrotic core (caseum) surrounded by concentric layers of infected and uninfected macrophages, T cells, fibroblasts, and fibrotic collagen [3,55,56]. While granulomas play a central role in the immunological containment of Mycobacterium, their dense architecture and heterogeneous microenvironment present significant barriers to SMD penetration and limit drug bioavailability at the site of infection [56]. While efficient Ab delivery depends heavily on circulatory access when delivered via intravenous or subcutaneous routes, they bind essentially irreversibly once they find their target and hence can accumulate over time. Due to their longer circulating half-lives, the need for significantly higher dosing remains a more remote possibility. We discuss this aspect in more detail in Section 6.

3.3. MtbADCs Hold Strong Potential as Pan-TB Agents

Pan-TB recognition requires antibodies that target surface antigens consistently expressed across diverse bacterial metabolic states and, ideally, conserved throughout the MTBC. Open-access antibody resources facilitate systematic screening to identify Mtb-specific antibodies against abundant, conserved surface antigens, establishing a foundation for broad-spectrum therapeutic strategies.
Furthermore, MtbADCs can be engineered for intracellular drug delivery, specifically targeting Mtb reservoirs in macrophages. When combined with optimized Fc-mediated effector functions, such ADCs could improve drug bioavailability within hard-to-reach intracellular compartments, supporting the development of a potent, pan-TB therapeutic regimen effective against both ATB and LTBI (Figure 1). We discuss these aspects more in Section 6.

3.4. MtbADCs Support the Development of Potent TB Therapeutics with Shorter Treatment Duration: Linker Function

In ADC design, the linker plays a critical role in ensuring payload stability in circulation while enabling controlled drug release at the target site. By providing safeguards against systemic release, linkers permit the use of highly potent but non-specific cytotoxic SMDs. Either a cleavable or an uncleavable linker can fulfill the goal of stable payload retention during systemic circulation [44,57]. Controlled drug release, traditionally either via pH change or enzymes acting only at the target site, minimizes unwanted cytotoxicity and maximizes the precision of drug action via localized, concentrated drug delivery. Such targeted delivery should result in greater kill rates in the main Mtb reservoir, thereby reducing necessary treatment schedules. We discuss these aspects more in Section 5.

4. Payloads in MtbADCs

Current TB treatment relies on multi-drug combination regimens to enhance therapeutic efficacy and minimize the emergence of drug resistance. Frontline agents such as isoniazid, rifampicin, and/or moxifloxacin can serve as ADC payloads. These inhibitors are incompletely buried when bound to the target active site—solvent still contacts some inhibitor atoms. These solvent-exposed atoms presumably confer little binding affinity to the inhibitor-target complex. Modification of these atoms can create handles from which linkers to the Ab may be attached without significantly altering the binding affinity of the complex. Note, however, that modifying an SMD can affect its PK/PD profile, and the modified product that the ADC releases must be profiled to ensure it behaves at least as well as the unmodified original. In addition to current frontline agents, more potent or less conventional TB agents can also be considered by leveraging the safety afforded by ADC linker technology. For example, early-stage candidates with otherwise limiting toxicities, such as thioridazine (TZ), could be repurposed. TZ exhibits broad-spectrum antimycobacterial activity against drug-sensitive and drug-resistant intracellular Mtb [58,59], but cardiotoxicity and neurotoxicity constrain its clinical use [60,61]. Incorporating TZ into an ADC formulation involving a linker designed for compartment-specific drug release could mitigate these off-target effects and increase therapeutic potential.
Enhancing the therapeutic potential of the payload, particularly in intracellular environments, remains an active area of research. For example, KRM-1657, a decades-old compound, demonstrated superior in vitro activity against Mtb compared to rifampicin [62]. Yet because of unacceptable side effects, its development was discontinued. Recently, KRM-1657 was incorporated into ADCs, showing prolonged activity against Staphylococcus aureus within phagosomes [50] with significantly reduced side-effects. Once again, the ADC approach to target intracellular pathogens appears viable while simultaneously mitigating otherwise harmful side effects.

5. Linkers for ADCs

Enzyme-cleavable linkers, such as the valine-citrulline (Val-Cit) dipeptide linker, susceptible to cathepsin B (CatB) activity, could offer particular benefits in the TB context. Cathepsin enzymes localize within phagolysosomes and cleave in a pH-dependent manner, with activity increasing as the macrophage phagolysosome acidifies. Payloads would theoretically release predominantly within the Mtb reservoir, minimizing off-target effects while preserving therapeutic potency and precision (Figure 1B). Yet, Mtb interrupts pH lowering in phagolysosomes, thus significantly lowering the rates of cleavage for most cathepsins. Some CatB activity still remains at pH 6.5, a typical acidity for the immature phagolysosome. As long as the payload cannot rapidly escape the local environment or can target both actively replicating and dormant bacilli, the risk of metabolic variants and persisters developing strong resistance should be low while allowing for significant kill rates over time.
Other, less traditional linkers may offer greater opportunities for specifically targeting Mtb-infected macrophages. Potential candidates include Cathepsin S (CatS)- or β-glucuronidase (BG)-cleavable linkers. Much like CatB, both CatS and BG are almost exclusively found in phagolysozomes, implying that the linkers will release their payloads almost exclusively in phagolysosomes. CatS still retains strong catalytic activity at or below pH 7 [63], making linkers that include its substrate a reasonable choice. The peptides Val-Cit and GGFG are known CatS substrates and effective linkers, particularly with self-immolating p-aminobenzyloxycarbonyl spacers (PABCs) proximally attached. Nevertheless, optimization towards CatS substrates at pH 7 would permit more efficient payload release in Mtb reservoirs. Similarly, BG-cleavable linkers have been frequently employed, with cleavage activating PABC self-immolation and release of the payload [46]. Since Mtb does not down-regulate BG activity, linkers incorporating its substrate (a β-glucuronide), together with a PABC spacer, appear as strong candidates in MtbADCs. Alternate linkers that do not rely on pH or enzymatic cleavage would likely need to rely on other enzymes, absent in circulation, but available in the immature phagolysosome and active at pH 6.5.
The flexible modularity of the ADC platform enables integration of diverse payload classes to achieve additive or synergistic effects. Advances in linker chemistry, including branched designs [57], enable ADCs to carry multiple bioactive agents as the payload, achieving additive or synergistic antimicrobial effects and accommodating novel therapeutic modalities beyond conventional SMDs. In addition to carrying bactericides or cytotoxic compounds, host tissue repair or immune modulators could be dosed in combination, for instance, with MtbADCs for host-directed therapy (HDTs) [64,65]. Alternatively, branched linkers carrying both antimicrobials and factors beneficial to the host could be attached to a single Ab as the payload [57]. These HDTs may serve to normalize the microenvironment of granulomas, enabling more effective ADC PD.

6. Mtb Antibody Resource for MtbADC Abs

6.1. Antibody Selection for MtbADC Development

In this review, we highlight a promising yet underexplored avenue in TB research, MtbADCs. While several potent SMDs exist and certain linkers are very well established, Mtb-specific Abs remain underexplored for viability as a component in an ADC, thus limiting an immediate MtbADC application. Ab selection critically determines the eventual success of the MtbADC. It determines affinity for either the Mtb or macrophage antigens, as well as selectivity for the macrophage phagolysosome over other tissues and other compartments. It strongly influences circulatory half-lives and, hence, favorable PK. The Biodefense and Emerging Infections Research Resources Repository (BEI, https://www.beiresources.org/, accessed on 28 August 2025), an open-access Mtb Ab resource, has significantly advanced opportunities employing this approach in the past few years. This resource stems from a National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) initiative aimed at supporting TB research and clinical development. BEI produces, curates, and distributes mouse monoclonal Abs derived from deposited hybridoma clones raised against key Mtb virulence factors involved in bacillary pathogenesis and immune evasion [43,66]. The BEI Mtb Abs can be screened for surface-exposed Mtb native Ags conserved and consistently expressed across diverse infection states and phenotypic variants. Viable hits would serve as a backbone for ADC construction.
The antigen repertoire spans both surface-associated and secreted proteins, including lipoarabinomannan (LAM) [67,68,69], the Ag85 complex [70], heparin-binding hemagglutinin (HBHA) [71], Mpt64/CFP-21 [72], and PhoS1/PstS1 [73]. It also includes cell wall or envelope components such as LprG/P27 [74], molecular chaperones including GroES [75], DnaK [76], and HspX [77], which contribute to bacterial fitness and immune modulation. Additional antigens include detoxification enzymes such as catalase-peroxidase (KatG) [78,79] and superoxide dismutase A (SodA) [80], critical for Mtb resistance to oxidative stress within host phagosomes. Many of these antigens have been prioritized in recent years for TB intervention strategies, including vaccine development (e.g., Ag85, HspX, HBHA, and DnaK) [36,81,82,83,84], diagnostic tools (e.g., Mpt64, LAM, and KatG mutations) [85,86,87], and therapeutic approaches (e.g., LAM) [67].
Within this resource, surface antigens such as LAM, PhoS1/PstS1, HBHA, and LprG/p27 emerge as particularly promising targets. For instance, PhoS1/PstS1, requisite for Mtb virulence, functions as an ABC transporter involved in phosphate homeostasis [73]. Antibodies against PhoS1/PstS1 attenuate Mtb pathogenicity [88]. An ADC directed at this antigen could deliver the dual benefits of virulence suppression (via Ab) and pathogen killing (via payload drug). Importantly, PhoS1/PstS1 is a membrane-anchored, non-secreted protein, a favorable feature for precision targeting, and is also highly conserved across MTBC, with ~95% pairwise identity based on NCBI BLASTp analysis (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/, accessed on 28 August 2025). An ADC targeting such an antigen could therefore represent a broad therapeutic strategy against both Mtb and related mycobacterium pathogens.

6.2. Ab Effector Function for MtbADC Development

Careful design can enable MtbADC binding to either infected macrophages or bacilli-associated Ags, triggering the uptake into efficient endocytic/phagocytic or receptor-mediated pathways. Mtb internalization in professional phagocytes (such as macrophages) is primarily mediated via phagocytosis, which antibody- and complement-mediated opsonization strongly enhance [89]. In addition to the classical Fcγ receptor-mediated phagocytosis (Figure 1B,C), bacilli can also enter cells through other routes, such as receptor-mediated endocytosis (e.g., mannose receptor [90]; scavenger receptors [91] or macropinocytosis [92]). Figure 1 shows the major pathogen internalization route and suggests possible antibody engineering can be accompanied to enforce the endocytic pathway. For instance, to increase internalization and ensure specificity, the antibody could be engineered as a bispecific Ab (Figure 1A, Right) eliciting greater versatility with one arm binding to an Mtb surface Ag and another arm recognizing infection-upregulated macrophage markers, e.g., FcγRI (CD64) [93] or mannose receptor (CD206) [90,93]. This dual valency may improve endocytosis/phagocytosis efficiency, increasing the frequency of payload cleavage in phagolysosomes.
MtbADCs will benefit from additional functionalities. Mtb can partially block fusion of the phagosome with the lysosome (“fusion event”) and then indefinitely forestall phagolysosome maturation via, e.g., SapM, ManLAM, PtpA, or Ndk [94,95,96,97]. Fc-engineering for high-affinity FcγRI/II binding becomes important to counteract these functions. FcγR-mediated phagosomes have higher rates of fusion with lysosomes compared to complement receptor–mediated phagosomes [98,99,100]. Strong FcγR crosslinking can create sustained signaling through the Syk/PI3K/PLCγ pathway, leading to actin remodeling that at least partially overcomes coronin-1/ManLAM-mediated arrest of fusion events [98]. Combination therapeutic approaches represent a viable alternative. In addition to the MtbADC, host-directed modulators such as the PknG inhibitor AX20017 [101] or immune modulators such as drugs that boost Ca2+ signaling [102] may restore phagosome maturation and help ADCs reach lysosomal compartments to release their payload.
The BEI resource holds particular value in Fc-engineering, providing the corresponding IgV or Fab sequences for many Mtb-targeting Abs, thereby facilitating Fc isotype switching through recombinant antibody engineering. These sequences could readily and critically assist in developing antibody-based therapeutics with improved specificity, sensitivity, half-life, and safety, or advance fundamental antibody studies of TB immunity. For instance, Grace P.S. et al. recently utilized sequence data from this resource to show that Fc-effector function differentially contributes to early Mtb restriction [103].
Table 1 describes the Mtb-Ab collection and Supplementary S1 and Tables S1 and S2 list their corresponding GenBank accession numbers and their sequence information, including their framework regions (FR1–FR4) and the complementarity-determining regions (CDR1–CDR3) of the IgV sequence. Domain annotation follows the numbering schemes of IMGT (https://www.imgt.org/HighV-QUEST/http://www.imgt.org/IMGT_vquest/vquest, accessed on 19 September 2025) (Table S1) or KABAT (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/igblast/igblast.cgi, accessed on 28 August 2025) (Table S2).
This BEI resource provides high-fidelity sequences for the clones in Table 1. Hybridoma sequencing frequently yields multiple antibody sequences, including incomplete or nonfunctional variants [104], and many publicly available IgV (Fab) sequences lack verification for productive immunoglobulin expression or epitope-binding. In contrast, this resource employs a deep sequencing approach to identify antibody-encoding IgV regions from hybridoma clones. To ensure functional relevance, Ab–Ag interactions were validated through epitope-binding assays using an isotype-switching approach [43]. Only verified and functional IgV sequences were deposited into GenBank, ensuring a reliable foundation for downstream applications.
Despite the favorable developments in Ab selection, experimental determination of the penetration rate and whether such a rate could deliver sufficient doses of their payloads to Mtb remains a crucial unknown. Antibody engineering has advanced significantly in recent years [46], enabling smaller sized ADCs [105] that, e.g., employ a monovalent antibody to enhance tissue penetration. Ab half-life [106] and phagocytotic capacity [107] can be enhanced to increase drug accumulation at the desired target. Combination strategies with other therapeutics, such as HDTs, to improve the granuloma microenvironment may also be beneficial. The route of administration may provide a means to circumvent circulation barriers to some degree. For instance, employing an air inhaler for direct pulmonary exposure (in low-resource settings) or direct injection into granulomas (in clinical settings) should localize MtbADCs largely to target tissues. Ultimately, a successful ADC approach will depend on optimizing antibody access, internalization efficiency, and stability within the granuloma microenvironment to overcome the barrier of a poorly vascularized necrotic core.
Predicting ADC stability is more art than science, but empirically, half-lives in circulation range from hours to weeks [108]. Optimizing ADCs to exhibit longer serum half-lives will, in principle, assist in the targeted delivery of payloads to infection sites with improved PK and PD. Several of the ADC’s components impact their stability. For instance, the antibody types [45], the linker chemistry [109,110], the site of payload (SMD) attachment to the antibody [109,110], and the drug-to-antibody ratio (DAR) [110] all play a role. For standard IgG antibodies, the half-life of IgG1, IgG2, and IgG4 subtypes is approximately three weeks in blood, whereas for IgG3, it is around only one week [45]. Extending the half-life of the ADC may be possible via clever engineering [106]. Importantly, different clearance rates can occur between patient and control cohorts and should be accounted for during research and development stages [48,111,112].

7. Conclusions

The persistent global burden of Mtb-induced TB underscores the urgent need for transformative therapeutic strategies. Future inhibitors must hold bactericidal activity against both actively replicating and dormant bacilli. Further, these inhibitors must achieve sufficient tissue penetration. Effective inhibitors will reach Mtb persisters in recalcitrant environments such as heterogeneous lesion microenvironments or “reservoir” tissues that enable persistence or relapse (e.g., paucibacillary macrophages). Next-generation agents must also combine target specificity with high potency to mitigate systemic toxicity and reduce drug–drug interactions, particularly in populations with comorbidities such as HIV or diabetes. Although improved PK and PD properties represent significant milestones, shortening treatment duration remains the critical benchmark, as regimen length continues to drive poor adherence and subsequent emergence of resistance. Ultimately, a simplified, broadly active “pan-TB” therapeutic, effective across drug-susceptible, MDR, and XDR strains, represents a disruptive technology advance, streamlining clinical management and accelerating global TB elimination efforts.
MtbADCs align closely with the attributes required for transformative TB therapeutics. In addition to improving PK profiles relative to SMDs, antibodies provide a powerful dual function: Fab-mediated Ag recognition for precise targeting of Mtb virulence factors, and Fc receptor–mediated internalization to facilitate intracellular delivery. By leveraging high-affinity Ab–Ag interactions, MtbADCs offer potential to overcome the limitations of passive SMD distribution across all tissues and enable co-localized concentration of payloads into Mtb-infected tissues. This targeted delivery not only enhances PD properties but also raises the prospect of reducing treatment cycles compared with conventional regimens.
The selection of antibodies as the backbone of MtbADCs will ultimately determine their therapeutic scope, whether deployed as highly specific agents or as broad-spectrum pan-TB regimens. Open-access repositories such as the BEI Resources, NCBI (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/, accessed on 28 August 2025), the European Nucleotide Archive (ENA, https://www.ebi.ac.uk/ena, accessed on 28 August 2025), and the AntiBodies Chemically Defined (ABCD) Database (https://web.expasy.org/abcd/, accessed on 28 August 2025) collectively provide a growing pool of TB-specific antibody sequences. However, a major limitation across many of these repositories is the lack of comprehensive experimental validation, particularly regarding expression, secretion, and epitope-binding. This gap restricts their immediate translational application, especially for ADC development, since these Abs require extensive expression and Ag-binding validation before considering incorporation into ADCs.
Nevertheless, the expanding deposits into Mtb Ab repositories constitute a critical enabling tool for TB research and innovation beyond ADCs. These resources provide valuable assets for biomarker discovery that could distinguish active from latent or dormant infection, thereby advancing early detection, disease staging, and precision clinical management. In parallel, these Abs support mechanistic investigations into TB immunity, including the humoral contributions that guide rational vaccine design. Collectively, Mtb Ab resources represent an indispensable foundation for both basic and translational research. By accelerating the development of improved diagnostics, therapeutics, and vaccines, they hold promise for overcoming current barriers and driving progress toward global TB control and eventual eradication.
A criterion for selecting the exact Ab for ADC deployment involves the abundance of the Ag recognized by the Ab, with preference given to more abundant Ags. The greater the abundance, the fewer payloads necessary per ADC. BEI’s curated library of Mtb antibodies directed against critical surface Ags offers the opportunity for pan-TB recognition by attenuating Mtb virulence while directing SMDs to Mtb with high specificity. Their abundance still requires quantification. This resource also provides ready access to Ab IgV sequences for down-stream engineering and optimization. Together, this resource and associated Abs enable the rational design and evaluation of MtbADCs as feasible candidates for TB therapeutics.
Recent advances in ADC linker technology further elevate the promise of this approach. Modern cleavable and highly stable linkers provide systemic safeguards against premature release while ensuring efficient payload liberation within infected cells. Moreover, the emergence of branched linker designs offers the possibility of incorporating multiple bioactive agents into a single payload construct, increasing the feasibility of a unified “one-regimen” TB therapy.
Many excellent SMDs are available as payloads. Selecting the Ab and linker, therefore, represents the greatest hurdle to realizing therapeutic MtbADCs. The relatively high pH (~6.5) found in the immature phagolysosomes of macrophages limits deployment of many of the more common ADC linkers, suggesting more innovation in this space may be required to achieve optimal delivery. Nevertheless, linkers that couple either CatS cleavable peptide bonds or β-glucuronides (BG substrates) with self-immolating PBMCs appear likely to succeed without significant modification.
One of the remaining great challenges lies in the delivery of ADCs. To treat pulmonary TB, concentrated, direct, local delivery would avoid systemic circulation; thus, increasing drug stability and enhancing patient safety. The drug formulation could be nebulized liquids or dry-powders and administered via a disposable inhaler. Dry powder offers thermostability and ease in handling, storage, and shipping. While these characteristics complement well the needs of community/home health-care providers in low resource areas, uniform preparation of intact and/or functional Abs in powder form remains an area of active research. This practical consideration must be overcome in order to make large-scale investments in Mtb-ADC research worthwhile. As a potential alternative, collaborations between governmental agencies, such as the WHO, with large pharmaceutical companies could enable delivery of viable ADCs using a nebulizer strategy.
For extrapulmonary TB, systemic delivery will be necessary. Long half-lives in circulation will become essential. The drug formulation should be suited for intravenous or subcutaneous routes of administration, hence excluding most low resource environments. Clinical, hospital, or other highly trained staff will likely be required for administration. Nevertheless, if successfully developed, this strategy holds promise to simplify TB treatment into a single-agent regimen, thereby improving patient adherence and advancing global TB control and eradication efforts.
Coupling Ab advances with ADCs could transform TB into a much more managed disease in the next two decades. A successful design should couple antibody targeting (via Ab selection and engineering), Fc-biology, linker chemistry, payload selection, and a feasible delivery route that maximizes macrophage access. Based on the success of therapeutic ADCs targeting tumors, ADC designs should exhibit high stability in blood, maintaining >90% intact conjugated payloads while circulating for days to weeks, until reaching the targeted compartments [109]. Employing linkers resistant to hydrolysis except in the phagolysosome largely achieves this profile. Well-engineered Abs serve to increase circulatory lifetimes while increasing target specificity. The ideal MtbADC, based on current standards, would consist of an antibody that recognizes a pan-Mtb Ag across clinical variants, with strong Ag-binding and efficient internalization into target cells, e.g., an anti-CD64/anti-PhoS1/PstS1 bispecific Ab. It should exhibit effective tissue penetration and a sustained serum half-life to enable drug accumulation at the site of infection, e.g., Fc-engineered for high-affinity FcγRI/II binding and dosed with HDTs that enable better granuloma penetration. The linker, such as a Val-Cit peptide cleaved by CatS, would ensure controlled drug release within the targeted compartment. The payload, for example, TZ, should provide broad-spectrum bactericidal activity against diverse Mtb phenotypes, including non-replicating bacilli. Finally, the formulation should allow for route-specific dosing, whether by pulmonary delivery or systemic circulation. MtbADCs are positioned as a transformative platform for potent single-agent TB therapeutics, as long as the issues in the engineering of the Ab can be overcome.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/microorganisms13102234/s1. Table S1. Summary of the nucleic acid sequences of immunoglobulin light and heavy chains based on the IMGT definition. Table S2. Summary of the nucleic acid sequences of immunoglobulin light and heavy chains based on the KABAT definition. Supplementary S1. FASTA IgV (Fab) sequences for BEI-Mtb Hybridoma clones in Table 1.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, H.-C.F.; validation, H.-C.F. and K.W.F.; data curation, H.-C.F.; writing—original draft preparation, H.-C.F.; writing—review and editing, H.-C.F. and K.W.F.; visualization, H.-C.F.; funding acquisition, K.W.F. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

No new data were created or analyzed in this study. Data sharing is not applicable to this article.

Conflicts of Interest

Hui-Chen Foreman is employed by the company Mercy LLC. The remaining author declares that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Abbreviations

The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript:
TBTuberculosis
MtbMycobacterium tuberculosis or M. tuberculosis
LAMLipoarabinomannan
HspXHeat shock protein X
Ag85Antigen 85 complex
HBHAHeparin-binding haemagglutinin
LprGLipoprotein regulatory G
SodASuperoxide Dismutase A
KatGCatalase–Peroxidase G
Mpt64Mycobacterium protein 64
PhoS1/PstS1Phosphate-binding protein S1
AbAntibody
IgImmunoglobulin
IgVImmunoglobulin variable chain
CDRComplementarity determined regions
FRFramework regions
FabFragment antigen-binding
FcImmunoglobulin constant fragment

References

  1. Chakaya, J.; Khan, M.; Ntoumi, F.; Aklillu, E.; Fatima, R.; Mwaba, P.; Kapata, N.; Mfinanga, S.; Hasnain, S.E.; Katoto, P.D.M.C.; et al. Global Tuberculosis Report 2020–Reflections on the Global TB burden, treatment and prevention efforts. Int. J. Infect. Dis. 2021, 113, S7–S12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Friedrich, M.J. Tuberculosis Update 2017. JAMA 2017, 318, 2287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Pai, M.; Behr, M.A.; Dowdy, D.; Dheda, K.; Divangahi, M.; Boehme, C.C.; Ginsberg, A.; Swaminathan, S.; Spigelman, M.; Getahun, H.; et al. Tuberculosis. Nat. Rev. Dis. Primers. 2016, 2, 16076. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Jarachvarawat, C. Epidemiology of Tuberculosis in South-East Asia Region. J. Public Health 2010, 39, 111–122. [Google Scholar]
  5. Andrews, J.R.; Morrow, C.; Wood, R. Modeling the role of public transportation in sustaining tuberculosis transmission in South Africa. Am. J. Epidemiol. 2013, 177, 556–561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. World Health Organization. Tuberculosis, 2021c. 2025. Available online: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/tuberculosis (accessed on 19 September 2025).
  7. WHO. Global Tuberculosis Report 2024. 2024. Available online: https://www.who.int/teams/global-programme-on-tuberculosis-and-lung-health/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2024 (accessed on 19 September 2025).
  8. Gagneux, S. Ecology and evolution of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2018, 16, 202–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Lai, R.; Williams, T.; Rakib, T.; Lee, J.; Behar, S.M. Heterogeneity in lung macrophage control of Mycobacterium tuberculosis is modulated by T cells. Nat. Commun. 2024, 15, 5710. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Philips, J.A.; Ernst, J.D. Tuberculosis pathogenesis and immunity. Annu. Rev. Pathol. 2012, 7, 353–384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Kaufmann, S.H.E. How can immunology contribute to the control of tuberculosis? Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2001, 1, 20–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Bo, H.; Moure, U.A.E.; Yang, Y.; Pan, J.; Li, L.; Wang, M.; Ke, X.; Cui, H. Mycobacterium tuberculosis-macrophage interaction: Molecular updates. Front. Cell Infect. Microbiol. 2023, 13, 1062963. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Sia, J.K.; Rengarajan, J. Immunology of Mycobacterium tuberculosis Infections. Microbiol. Spectr. 2019, 7, 1–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Gomez, J.E.; McKinney, J.D.M. tuberculosis persistence, latency, and drug tolerance. Tuberculosis 2004, 84, 29–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Gupta, A.; Kaul, A.; Tsolaki, A.G.; Kishore, U.; Bhakta, S. Mycobacterium tuberculosis: Immune evasion, latency and reactivation. Immunobiology 2012, 217, 363–374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Golden, M.P.; Vikram, H.R. Extrapulmonary tuberculosis: An overview. Am. Fam. Physician 2005, 72, 1761–1768. [Google Scholar]
  17. WHO. Global Tuberculosis Report 2020 (WHO/HTM/TB/2020.20). 2020. Available online: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240013131 (accessed on 8 August 2025).
  18. Dinnes, J.; Deeks, J.; Kunst, H.; Gibson, A.; Cummins, E.; Waugh, N.; Drobniewski, F.; Lalvani, A. A systematic review of rapid diagnostic tests for the detection of tuberculosis infection. Health Technol. Assess 2007, 11, 1–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Dartois, V.A.; Rubin, E.J. Anti-tuberculosis treatment strategies and drug development: Challenges and priorities. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2022, 20, 685–701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Zhang, X.; Zhao, R.; Qi, Y.; Yan, X.; Qi, G.; Peng, Q. The progress of Mycobacterium tuberculosis drug targets. Front. Med. 2024, 11, 1455715. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Horsburgh, C.R., Jr.; Barry, C.E., 3rd; Lange, C. Treatment of Tuberculosis. N. Engl. J. Med. 2015, 373, 2149–2160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Mereškevičienė, R.; Danila, E. The Adverse Effects of Tuberculosis Treatment: A Comprehensive Literature Review. Medicina 2025, 61, 911. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Tune, B.X.-J.; Stephen, A.; Guad, R.M.; Fuloria, N.K.; Subramaniyan, V.; Sekar, M.; Wu, Y.S. Pharmacological Management of Tuberculosis, Challenges, and Potential Strategies. Prog. Drug Discov. Amp; Biomed. Sci. 2024, 7, a0000438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. WHO. WHO Consolidated Guidelines on Tuberculosis: Module 4: Treatment: Drug-Susceptible Tuberculosis Treatment. 2022. Available online: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240048126 (accessed on 8 August 2025).
  25. Conradie, F.; Bagdasaryan, T.R.; Borisov, S.; Howell, P.; Mikiashvili, L.; Ngubane, N.; Samoilova, A.; Skornykova, S.; Tudor, E.; Variava, E.; et al. Bedaquiline-Pretomanid-Linezolid Regimens for Drug-Resistant Tuberculosis. N. Engl. J. Med. 2022, 387, 810–823. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Conradie, F.; Diacon, A.H.; Ngubane, N.; Howell, P.; Everitt, D.; Crook, A.M.; Mendel, C.M.; Egizi, E.; Moreira, J.; Timm, J.; et al. Treatment of Highly Drug-Resistant Pulmonary Tuberculosis. N. Engl. J. Med. 2020, 382, 893–902. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Conradie, F.; Diacon, A.H.; Ngubane, N.; Howell, P.; Everitt, D.E.; Crook, A.; Mendel, C.M.; Egizi, E.; Moreira, J.; Timm, J.; et al. Bedaquiline, pretomanid and linezolid for treatment of extensively drug resistant, intolerant or non-responsive multidrug resistant pulmonary tuberculosis. N. Engl. J. Med. 2020, 382, 893–902. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Ojha, A.K.; Baughn, A.D.; Sambandan, D.; Hsu, T.; Trivelli, X.; Guerardel, Y.; Alahari, A.; Kremer, L.; Jacobs, W.R., Jr.; Hatfull, G.F. Growth of Mycobacterium tuberculosis biofilms containing free mycolic acids and harbouring drug-tolerant bacteria. Mol. Microbiol. 2008, 69, 164–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Gengenbacher, M.; Kaufmann, S.H.E. Mycobacterium tuberculosis: Success through dormancy. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 2012, 36, 514–532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Coates, A.; Hu, Y.; Bax, R.; Page, C. The future challenges facing the development of new antimicrobial drugs. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2002, 1, 895–910. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Lin, P.L.; Flynn, J.L. Understanding latent tuberculosis: A moving target. J. Immunol. 2010, 185, 15–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Campbell, J.R.; Dowdy, D.; Schwartzman, K. Treatment of latent infection to achieve tuberculosis elimination in low-incidence countries. PLoS Med. 2019, 16, e1002824. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. WHO. WHO Consolidated Guidelines on Tuberculosis: Module 1: Prevention–Tuberculosis Preventive Treatment. 2020. Available online: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240096196 (accessed on 8 August 2025).
  34. Andersen, P.; Doherty, T.M. The success and failure of BCG-implications for a novel tuberculosis vaccine. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2005, 3, 656–662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Zhou, F.Q.; Zhang, Y.; Zhang, D. Latest advances in the development of tuberculosis vaccines in global clinical trials: A review. Zhongguo Xue Xi Chong Bing Fang Zhi Za Zhi Chin. J. Schistosomiasis Control 2024, 36, 201–206. [Google Scholar]
  36. An, Y.; Ni, R.; Zhuang, L.; Yang, L.; Ye, Z.; Li, L.; Parkkila, S.; Aspatwar, A.; Gong, W. Tuberculosis vaccines and therapeutic drug: Challenges and future directions. Mol. Biomed. 2025, 6, 4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Lu, R.-M.; Hwang, Y.-C.; Liu, I.J.; Lee, C.-C.; Tsai, H.-Z.; Li, H.-J.; Wu, H.-C. Development of therapeutic antibodies for the treatment of diseases. J. Biomed. Sci. 2020, 27, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Fan, G.; Li, J. Engineering Antibodies for the Treatment of Infectious Diseases. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 2017, 1053, 207–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Saeed, A.F.; Wang, R.; Ling, S.; Wang, S. Antibody Engineering for Pursuing a Healthier Future. Front. Microbiol. 2017, 8, 495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Sievers, S.A.; Scharf, L.; West, A.P., Jr.; Bjorkman, P.J. Antibody engineering for increased potency, breadth and half-life. Curr. Opin. HIV AIDS 2015, 10, 151–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Schroeder, H.W.; Cavacini, L. Structure and function of immunoglobulins. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2010, 125, S41–S52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Ekins, S. Hacking into the granuloma: Could antibody antibiotic conjugates be developed for TB? Tuberculosis 2014, 94, 715–716. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Foreman, H.C.; Frank, A.; Stedman, T.T. Determination of variable region sequences from hybridoma immunoglobulins that target Mycobacterium tuberculosis virulence factors. PLoS ONE 2021, 16, e0256079. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Baah, S.; Laws, M.; Rahman, K.M. Antibody-Drug Conjugates—A Tutorial Review. Molecules 2021, 26, 2943. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Coleman, N.; Yap, T.A.; Heymach, J.V.; Meric-Bernstam, F.; Le, X. Antibody-drug conjugates in lung cancer: Dawn of a new era? NPJ Precis. Oncol. 2023, 7, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Wang, R.; Hu, B.; Pan, Z.; Mo, C.; Zhao, X.; Liu, G.; Hou, P.; Cui, Q.; Xu, Z.; Wang, W.; et al. Antibody–Drug Conjugates (ADCs): Current and future biopharmaceuticals. J. Hematol. Oncol. 2025, 18, 51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Tvilum, A.; Johansen, M.I.; Glud, L.N.; Ivarsen, D.M.; Khamas, A.B.; Carmali, S.; Mhatre, S.S.; Sogaard, A.B.; Faddy, E.; de Vor, L.; et al. Antibody-Drug Conjugates to Treat Bacterial Biofilms via Targeting and Extracellular Drug Release. Adv. Sci. 2023, 10, e2301340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Peck, M.; Rothenberg, M.E.; Deng, R.; Lewin-Koh, N.; She, G.; Kamath, A.V.; Carrasco-Triguero, M.; Saad, O.; Castro, A.; Teufel, L.; et al. A Phase 1, Randomized, Single-Ascending-Dose Study To Investigate the Safety, Tolerability, and Pharmacokinetics of DSTA4637S, an Anti-Staphylococcus aureus Thiomab Antibody-Antibiotic Conjugate, in Healthy Volunteers. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2019, 63, 10-1128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Zhou, C.; Cai, H.; Baruch, A.; Lewin-Koh, N.; Yang, M.; Guo, F.; Xu, D.; Deng, R.; Hazenbos, W.; Kamath, A.V. Sustained activity of novel THIOMAB antibody-antibiotic conjugate against Staphylococcus aureus in a mouse model: Longitudinal pharmacodynamic assessment by bioluminescence imaging. PLoS ONE 2019, 14, e0224096. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Fan, S.; Bai, Y.; Li, Q.; Liu, L.; Wang, Y.; Xie, F.; Dong, Y.; Wang, Z.; Lv, K.; Zhu, H.; et al. Novel antibody-antibiotic conjugate using KRM-1657 as payload eliminates intracellular MRSA in vitro and in vivo. Bioorg. Chem. 2024, 150, 107532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Zhang, D.; Hop, C.; Patilea-Vrana, G.; Gampa, G.; Seneviratne, H.K.; Unadkat, J.D.; Kenny, J.R.; Nagapudi, K.; Di, L.; Zhou, L.; et al. Drug Concentration Asymmetry in Tissues and Plasma for Small Molecule-Related Therapeutic Modalities. Drug Metab. Dispos. Biol. Fate Chem. 2019, 47, 1122–1135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Datta, M.; Kennedy, M.; Siri, S.; Via, L.E.; Baish, J.W.; Xu, L.; Dartois, V.; Barry, C.E., 3rd; Jain, R.K. Mathematical model of oxygen, nutrient, and drug transport in tuberculosis granulomas. PLoS Comput. Biol. 2024, 20, e1011847. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Prideaux, B.; Via, L.E.; Zimmerman, M.D.; Eum, S.; Sarathy, J.; O’Brien, P.; Chen, C.; Kaya, F.; Weiner, D.M.; Chen, P.Y.; et al. The association between sterilizing activity and drug distribution into tuberculosis lesions. Nat. Med. 2015, 21, 1223–1227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Kokesch-Himmelreich, J.; Treu, A.; Race, A.M.; Walter, K.; Hölscher, C.; Römpp, A. Do Anti-tuberculosis Drugs Reach Their Target?—High-Resolution Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption/Ionization Mass Spectrometry Imaging Provides Information on Drug Penetration into Necrotic Granulomas. Anal. Chem. 2022, 94, 5483–5492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Sarathy, J.P.; Via, L.E.; Weiner, D.; Blanc, L.; Boshoff, H.; Eugenin, E.A.; Barry, C.E., 3rd; Dartois, V.A. Extreme Drug Tolerance of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in Caseum. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2018, 62, e02266-17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Cronan, M.R. In the Thick of It: Formation of the Tuberculous Granuloma and Its Effects on Host and Therapeutic Responses. Front. Immunol. 2022, 13, 820134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Lei, Y.; Zheng, M.; Chen, P.; Seng Ng, C.; Peng Loh, T.; Liu, H. Linker Design for the Antibody Drug Conjugates: A Comprehensive Review. ChemMedChem 2025, 20, e202500262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Ordway, D.; Viveiros, M.; Leandro, C.; Bettencourt, R.; Almeida, J.; Martins, M.; Kristiansen Jette, E.; Molnar, J.; Amaral, L. Clinical Concentrations of Thioridazine Kill Intracellular Multidrug-Resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2003, 47, 917–922. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Maitra, A.; Bates, S.; Kolvekar, T.; Devarajan, P.V.; Guzman, J.D.; Bhakta, S. Repurposing—A ray of hope in tackling extensively drug resistance in tuberculosis. Int. J. Infect. Dis. 2015, 32, 50–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Hale, P.W., Jr.; Poklis, A. Cardiotoxicity of thioridazine and two stereoisomeric forms of thioridazine 5-sulfoxide in the isolated perfused rat heart. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 1986, 86, 44–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Gottschalk, L.A.; Dinovo, E.; Biener, R.; Nandi, B.R. Plasma concentrations of thioridazine metabolites and ECG abnormalities. J. Pharm. Sci. 1978, 67, 155–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Fujii, K.; Tsuji, A.; Miyazaki, S.; Yamaguchi, K.; Goto, S. In vitro and in vivo antibacterial activities of KRM-1648 and KRM-1657, new rifamycin derivatives. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 1994, 38, 1118–1122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Vasiljeva, O.; Dolinar, M.; Pungercar, J.R.; Turk, V.; Turk, B. Recombinant human procathepsin S is capable of autocatalytic processing at neutral pH in the presence of glycosaminoglycans. FEBS Lett. 2005, 579, 1285–1290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Kolloli, A.; Subbian, S. Host-Directed Therapeutic Strategies for Tuberculosis. Front. Med. 2017, 4, 171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Young, C.; Walzl, G.; Du Plessis, N. Therapeutic host-directed strategies to improve outcome in tuberculosis. Mucosal Immunol. 2020, 13, 190–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Forrellad, M.A.; Klepp, L.I.; Gioffre, A.; Sabio y Garcia, J.; Morbidoni, H.R.; de la Paz Santangelo, M.; Cataldi, A.A.; Bigi, F. Virulence factors of the Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex. Virulence 2013, 4, 3–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Singh, B.; Saqib, M.; Chakraborty, A.; Bhaskar, S. Lipoarabinomannan from Mycobacterium indicus pranii shows immunostimulatory activity and induces autophagy in macrophages. PLoS ONE 2019, 14, e0224239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Correia-Neves, M.; Sundling, C.; Cooper, A.; Kallenius, G. Lipoarabinomannan in Active and Passive Protection Against Tuberculosis. Front. Immunol. 2019, 10, 1968. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Vergne, I.; Gilleron, M.; Nigou, J. Manipulation of the endocytic pathway and phagocyte functions by Mycobacterium tuberculosis lipoarabinomannan. Front. Cell Infect. Microbiol. 2014, 4, 187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Karbalaei Zadeh Babaki, M.; Soleimanpour, S.; Rezaee, S.A. Antigen 85 complex as a powerful Mycobacterium tuberculosis immunogene: Biology, immune-pathogenicity, applications in diagnosis, and vaccine design. Microb. Pathog. 2017, 112, 20–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Parra, M.; Pickett, T.; Delogu, G.; Dheenadhayalan, V.; Debrie, A.S.; Locht, C.; Brennan, M.J. The mycobacterial heparin-binding hemagglutinin is a protective antigen in the mouse aerosol challenge model of tuberculosis. Infect. Immun. 2004, 72, 6799–6805. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Stamm, C.E.; Pasko, B.L.; Chaisavaneeyakorn, S.; Franco, L.H.; Nair, V.R.; Weigele, B.A.; Alto, N.M.; Shiloh, M.U. Screening Mycobacterium tuberculosis Secreted Proteins Identifies Mpt64 as a Eukaryotic Membrane-Binding Bacterial Effector. mSphere 2019, 4, e00354-19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Peirs, P.; Lefèvre, P.; Boarbi, S.; Wang, X.-M.; Denis, O.; Braibant, M.; Pethe, K.; Locht, C.; Huygen, K.; Content, J. Mycobacterium tuberculosis with Disruption in Genes Encoding the Phosphate Binding Proteins PstS1 and PstS2 Is Deficient in Phosphate Uptake and Demonstrates Reduced In Vivo Virulence. Infect. Immun. 2005, 73, 1898–1902. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Shukla, S.; Richardson, E.T.; Athman, J.J.; Shi, L.; Wearsch, P.A.; McDonald, D.; Banaei, N.; Boom, W.H.; Jackson, M.; Harding, C.V. Mycobacterium tuberculosis lipoprotein LprG binds lipoarabinomannan and determines its cell envelope localization to control phagolysosomal fusion. PLoS Pathog. 2014, 10, e1004471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Aravindhan, V.; Christy, A.J.; Roy, S.; Ajitkumar, P.; Narayanan, P.R.; Narayanan, S. Mycobacterium tuberculosis groE promoter controls the expression of the bicistronic groESL1 operon and shows differential regulation under stress conditions. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 2009, 292, 42–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Lopes, R.L.; Borges, T.J.; Zanin, R.F.; Bonorino, C. IL-10 is required for polarization of macrophages to M2-like phenotype by mycobacterial DnaK (heat shock protein 70). Cytokine 2016, 85, 123–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Hu, Y.; Liu, A.; Menendez, M.C.; Garcia, M.J.; Oravcova, K.; Gillespie, S.H.; Davies, G.R.; Mitchison, D.A.; Coates, A.R. HspX knock-out in Mycobacterium tuberculosis leads to shorter antibiotic treatment and lower relapse rate in a mouse model—A potential novel therapeutic target. Tuberculosis 2015, 95, 31–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Nieto, R.L.; Mehaffy, C.; Creissen, E.; Troudt, J.; Troy, A.; Bielefeldt-Ohmann, H.; Burgos, M.; Izzo, A.; Dobos, K.M. Virulence of Mycobacterium tuberculosis after Acquisition of Isoniazid Resistance: Individual Nature of katG Mutants and the Possible Role of AhpC. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0166807. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Heym, B.; Zhang, Y.; Poulet, S.; Young, D.; Cole, S.T. Characterization of the katG gene encoding a catalase-peroxidase required for the isoniazid susceptibility of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. J. Bacteriol. 1993, 175, 4255–4259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Liao, D.; Fan, Q.; Bao, L. The role of superoxide dismutase in the survival of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in macrophages. Jpn. J. Infect. Dis. 2013, 66, 480–488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Teimourpour, R.; Peeridogaheh, H.; Teimourpour, A.; Arzanlou, M.; Meshkat, Z. A study on the immune response induced by a DNA vaccine encoding Mtb32C-HBHA antigen of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Iran. J. Basic Med. Sci. 2017, 20, 1119–1124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Izzo, A.A. Tuberculosis vaccines-perspectives from the NIH/NIAID Mycobacteria vaccine testing program. Curr. Opin. Immunol. 2017, 47, 78–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Chuang, Y.M.; Pinn, M.L.; Karakousis, P.C.; Hung, C.F. Intranasal Immunization with DnaK Protein Induces Protective Mucosal Immunity against Tuberculosis in CD4-Depleted Mice. Front. Cell Infect. Microbiol. 2018, 8, 31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Kaufmann, S.H.; Weiner, J.; von Reyn, C.F. Novel approaches to tuberculosis vaccine development. Int. J. Infect. Dis. 2017, 56, 263–267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Nguyen, T.N.A.; Anton-Le Berre, V.; Banuls, A.L.; Nguyen, T.V.A. Molecular Diagnosis of Drug-Resistant Tuberculosis; A Literature Review. Front. Microbiol. 2019, 10, 794. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Grønningen, E.; Nanyaro, M.; Sviland, L.; Ngadaya, E.; Muller, W.; Torres, L.; Mfinanga, S.; Mustafa, T. MPT64 antigen detection test improves diagnosis of pediatric extrapulmonary tuberculosis in Mbeya, Tanzania. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 17540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Valafar, S.J. Systematic Review of Mutations Associated with Isoniazid Resistance Points to Continuing Evolution and Subsequent Evasion of Molecular Detection, and Potential for Emergence of Multidrug Resistance in Clinical Strains of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2021, 65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Watson, A.; Li, H.; Ma, B.; Weiss, R.; Bendayan, D.; Abramovitz, L.; Ben-Shalom, N.; Mor, M.; Pinko, E.; Bar Oz, M.; et al. Human antibodies targeting a Mycobacterium transporter protein mediate protection against tuberculosis. Nat. Commun. 2021, 12, 602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Liu, D.; Wang, J.; Xu, Z.; Chen, X.; Jiao, X.A. Phagocytosis: Strategies for macrophages to hunt Mycobacterium tuberculosis. One Health Adv. 2024, 2, 32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Rajaram, M.V.S.; Arnett, E.; Azad, A.K.; Guirado, E.; Ni, B.; Gerberick, A.D.; He, L.-Z.; Keler, T.; Thomas, L.J.; Lafuse, W.P.; et al. M. tuberculosis-Initiated Human Mannose Receptor Signaling Regulates Macrophage Recognition and Vesicle Trafficking by FcRγ-Chain, Grb2, and SHP-1. Cell Rep. 2017, 21, 126–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Khan, H.S.; Nair, V.R.; Ruhl, C.R.; Alvarez-Arguedas, S.; Galvan Rendiz, J.L.; Franco, L.H.; Huang, L.; Shaul, P.W.; Kim, J.; Xie, Y.; et al. Identification of scavenger receptor B1 as the airway microfold cell receptor for Mycobacterium tuberculosis. eLife 2020, 9, e52551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Madrid-Paulino, E.; Mata-Espinosa, D.; Leon-Contreras, J.C.; Serrano-Fujarte, I.; Diaz de Leon-Guerrero, S.; Villasenor, T.; Ramon-Luing, L.; Puente, J.L.; Chavez-Galan, L.; Hernandez-Pando, R.; et al. Klf10 favors Mycobacterium tuberculosis survival by impairing IFN-gamma production and preventing macrophages reprograming to macropinocytosis. J. Leukoc. Biol. 2022, 112, 475–490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. Arce-Mendoza, A.; Rodriguez-de Ita, J.; Salinas-Carmona, M.C.; Rosas-Taraco, A.G. Expression of CD64, CD206, and RAGE in adherent cells of diabetic patients infected with Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Arch. Med. Res. 2008, 39, 306–311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Puri, R.V.; Reddy, P.V.; Tyagi, A.K. Secreted acid phosphatase (SapM) of Mycobacterium tuberculosis is indispensable for arresting phagosomal maturation and growth of the pathogen in guinea pig tissues. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e70514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  95. Vergne, I.; Chua, J.; Deretic, V. Tuberculosis toxin blocking phagosome maturation inhibits a novel Ca2+/calmodulin-PI3K hVPS34 cascade. J. Exp. Med. 2003, 198, 653–659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  96. Wong, D.; Bach, H.; Sun, J.; Hmama, Z.; Av-Gay, Y. Mycobacterium tuberculosis protein tyrosine phosphatase (PtpA) excludes host vacuolar-H+-ATPase to inhibit phagosome acidification. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2011, 108, 19371–19376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Sun, J.; Wang, X.; Lau, A.; Liao, T.Y.; Bucci, C.; Hmama, Z. Mycobacterial nucleoside diphosphate kinase blocks phagosome maturation in murine RAW 264.7 macrophages. PLoS ONE 2010, 5, e8769. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Crowley, M.T.; Costello, P.S.; Fitzer-Attas, C.J.; Turner, M.; Meng, F.; Lowell, C.; Tybulewicz, V.L.; DeFranco, A.L. A critical role for Syk in signal transduction and phagocytosis mediated by Fcgamma receptors on macrophages. J. Exp. Med. 1997, 186, 1027–1039. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Deghmane, A.E.; Soualhine, H.; Bach, H.; Sendide, K.; Itoh, S.; Tam, A.; Noubir, S.; Talal, A.; Lo, R.; Toyoshima, S.; et al. Lipoamide dehydrogenase mediates retention of coronin-1 on BCG vacuoles, leading to arrest in phagosome maturation. J. Cell Sci. 2007, 120, 2796–2806. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Lucas, A.T.; Robinson, R.; Schorzman, A.N.; Piscitelli, J.A.; Razo, J.F.; Zamboni, W.C. Pharmacologic Considerations in the Disposition of Antibodies and Antibody-Drug Conjugates in Preclinical Models and in Patients. Antibodies 2019, 8, 3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Scherr, N.; Honnappa, S.; Kunz, G.; Mueller, P.; Jayachandran, R.; Winkler, F.; Pieters, J.; Steinmetz, M.O. Structural basis for the specific inhibition of protein kinase G, a virulence factor of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2007, 104, 12151–12156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Lee, H.J.; Ko, H.J.; Song, D.K.; Jung, Y.J. Lysophosphatidylcholine Promotes Phagosome Maturation and Regulates Inflammatory Mediator Production Through the Protein Kinase A-Phosphatidylinositol 3 Kinase-p38 Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase Signaling Pathway During Mycobacterium tuberculosis Infection in Mouse Macrophages. Front. Immunol. 2018, 9, 920. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Grace, P.S.; Peters, J.M.; Sixsmith, J.; Lu, R.; Irvine, E.B.; Luedeman, C.; Fenderson, B.A.; Vickers, A.; Slein, M.D.; McKitrick, T.; et al. Antibody-Fab and -Fc features promote Mycobacterium tuberculosis restriction. Immunity 2025, 58, 1586–1597.e1585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  104. Bradbury, A.R.M.; Trinklein, N.D.; Thie, H.; Wilkinson, I.C.; Tandon, A.K.; Anderson, S.; Bladen, C.L.; Jones, B.; Aldred, S.F.; Bestagno, M.; et al. When monoclonal antibodies are not monospecific: Hybridomas frequently express additional functional variable regions. MAbs 2018, 10, 539–546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  105. Medina Pérez, V.M.; Baselga, M.; Schuhmacher, A.J. Single-Domain Antibodies as Antibody-Drug Conjugates: From Promise to Practice-A Systematic Review. Cancers 2024, 16, 2681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  106. Ying, T.; Wang, Y.; Feng, Y.; Prabakaran, P.; Gong, R.; Wang, L.; Crowder, K.; Dimitrov, D.S. Engineered antibody domains with significantly increased transcytosis and half-life in macaques mediated by FcRn. MAbs 2015, 7, 922–930. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  107. Richards, J.O.; Karki, S.; Lazar, G.A.; Chen, H.; Dang, W.; Desjarlais, J.R. Optimization of antibody binding to FcgammaRIIa enhances macrophage phagocytosis of tumor cells. Mol. Cancer Ther. 2008, 7, 2517–2527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  108. Cho, H.Y.; Lee, B.S. Key Considerations for Developing Next-Generation Antibody-Drug Conjugates. Available online: https://www.drugdiscoveryonline.com/doc/key-considerations-for-developing-next-generation-antibody-drug-conjugates-0001 (accessed on 15 August 2025).
  109. Alley, S.C.; Benjamin, D.R.; Jeffrey, S.C.; Okeley, N.M.; Meyer, D.L.; Sanderson, R.J.; Senter, P.D. Contribution of Linker Stability to the Activities of Anticancer Immunoconjugates. Bioconjugate Chem. 2008, 19, 759–765. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Durbin, K.R.; Nottoli, M.S.; Catron, N.D.; Richwine, N.; Jenkins, G.J. High-Throughput, Multispecies, Parallelized Plasma Stability Assay for the Determination and Characterization of Antibody–Drug Conjugate Aggregation and Drug Release. ACS Omega 2017, 2, 4207–4215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Rymut, S.M.; Deng, R.; Owen, R.; Saad, O.; Berhanu, A.; Lim, J.; Carrasco-Triguero, M.; Couch, J.A.; Peck, M.C. 1305. Comparison of Pharmacokinetics of DSTA4637S, a novel THIOMABTM Antibody-Antibiotic Conjugate, in Patients with Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia Receiving Standard-of-Care Antibiotics with Pharmacokinetics in Healthy Volunteers. Open Forum Infect. Dis. 2020, 7, S666–S667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Butler, M.S.; Henderson, I.R.; Capon, R.J.; Blaskovich, M.A.T. Antibiotics in the clinical pipeline as of December 2022. J. Antibiot. 2023, 76, 431–473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Schematic representation of the essential components of the Mycobacterium tuberculosis-targeting antibody drug conjugate (MtbADC) (A), its mechanism of internalization into macrophages (B), and its pharmacological mechanism of action against intracellular Mycobacterium tuberculosis bacilli (C). (A) MtbADC comprises an Ab, a cleavable linker (Black bar) and payloads (“Drug”, Yellow star). The Ab may be either monospecific (msADC) or bispecific (bsADC) and might recognize surface antigens of virulence-associated factors (Mtb_VAF, Pink oval, (Left)), cellular markers (Blue triangle, (Middle)) or both (Right). Payloads are frequently antimicrobials. (B) MtbADC mechanism of internalization. (Left) Opsonization. The Ab in the MtbADC binds the Mtb_VAF surface antigens. (Middle) The Ab in the MtbADC binds to antigens on the macrophage cell surface, forming a multivalent immunocomplex. (Right) Abs demonstrate greater versatility, with the capacity to both opsonize and recognize macrophage surface antigens. In all cases, FcγR receptor binding recruits actin machinery, inducing receptor-mediated phagocytosis. (C) MtbADC mode of action. The phagolysosomes form as the phagosomes containing the MtbADC-Ag complex fuse with lysosomes enriched in degradative enzymes such as cathepsins. In the presence of lysosomal enzymes, the ADC-linker degrades, resulting in controlled release of the payloads. Payloads are generally membrane-permeable, allowing access to other compartments in the cell once released. Mtb-killing modes include (1) directly acting on the novel, internalized population (Active replicating bacilli from ATB, Purple), and (2) Bystander effect, indirectly targeting the pre-existing or long-hidden latent, intracellular populations (Mtb phenotypic and metabolic variants, Green bacilli during both ATB and LTBI; Mtb persisters such as dormant bacilli, Orange bacilli during LTBI).
Figure 1. Schematic representation of the essential components of the Mycobacterium tuberculosis-targeting antibody drug conjugate (MtbADC) (A), its mechanism of internalization into macrophages (B), and its pharmacological mechanism of action against intracellular Mycobacterium tuberculosis bacilli (C). (A) MtbADC comprises an Ab, a cleavable linker (Black bar) and payloads (“Drug”, Yellow star). The Ab may be either monospecific (msADC) or bispecific (bsADC) and might recognize surface antigens of virulence-associated factors (Mtb_VAF, Pink oval, (Left)), cellular markers (Blue triangle, (Middle)) or both (Right). Payloads are frequently antimicrobials. (B) MtbADC mechanism of internalization. (Left) Opsonization. The Ab in the MtbADC binds the Mtb_VAF surface antigens. (Middle) The Ab in the MtbADC binds to antigens on the macrophage cell surface, forming a multivalent immunocomplex. (Right) Abs demonstrate greater versatility, with the capacity to both opsonize and recognize macrophage surface antigens. In all cases, FcγR receptor binding recruits actin machinery, inducing receptor-mediated phagocytosis. (C) MtbADC mode of action. The phagolysosomes form as the phagosomes containing the MtbADC-Ag complex fuse with lysosomes enriched in degradative enzymes such as cathepsins. In the presence of lysosomal enzymes, the ADC-linker degrades, resulting in controlled release of the payloads. Payloads are generally membrane-permeable, allowing access to other compartments in the cell once released. Mtb-killing modes include (1) directly acting on the novel, internalized population (Active replicating bacilli from ATB, Purple), and (2) Bystander effect, indirectly targeting the pre-existing or long-hidden latent, intracellular populations (Mtb phenotypic and metabolic variants, Green bacilli during both ATB and LTBI; Mtb persisters such as dormant bacilli, Orange bacilli during LTBI).
Microorganisms 13 02234 g001
Table 1. IgV sequenced BEI Mtb hybridomas and the corresponding antibody-associated information compiled from the BEI and NCBI websites. IgV sequences are deposited in NCBI GenBank. See the Supplemental Information for accession numbers.
Table 1. IgV sequenced BEI Mtb hybridomas and the corresponding antibody-associated information compiled from the BEI and NCBI websites. IgV sequences are deposited in NCBI GenBank. See the Supplemental Information for accession numbers.
BEI-Cell
Culture
Collection
CloneAntigenTarget GeneCorresponding BEI-Ab
Item
Ab Class
NRC-2893CS-35LAMn/aNR-13811IgG3κ
NRC-2895CS-49HspXRv2031cNR-13814IgG1
NRC-2897CS-90Ag85 complex Rv3804c Rv1886c Rv0129cNR-13816IgMκ
NRC-2914a-HBHAHBHARv0475NR-13804IgG2a
NRC-13806a-Rv1411c LprG/P27Rv1411cNR-55708IgG1κ
NRC-49679clone ADnaKRv0350NR-49679IgG1κ
NRC-50100clone BDnaKRv0350NR-50100IgG1κ
NRC-50101clone BKatGRv1908cNR-50101IgMκ
NRC-50703Anti-Mpt64, Clone AMpt64Rv1980cNR-59474IgG1κ
NRC-13810CS-18SodARv03846NR-13810IgG1κ
NRC-49680clone AKatGRv1908cNR-49680IgMκ
NRC-2894IT-3 (SA-12)GroESRv3418cNR-49223IgG2aκ
NRC-2410IT-15 (TB72)PhoS1/PstS1Rv0934NR-13605IgG1κ
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Foreman, K.W.; Foreman, H.-C. Challenges and Potential of Antibody–Drug Conjugates as Prospective Tuberculosis Therapeutics. Microorganisms 2025, 13, 2234. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms13102234

AMA Style

Foreman KW, Foreman H-C. Challenges and Potential of Antibody–Drug Conjugates as Prospective Tuberculosis Therapeutics. Microorganisms. 2025; 13(10):2234. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms13102234

Chicago/Turabian Style

Foreman, Kenneth W., and Hui-Chen Foreman. 2025. "Challenges and Potential of Antibody–Drug Conjugates as Prospective Tuberculosis Therapeutics" Microorganisms 13, no. 10: 2234. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms13102234

APA Style

Foreman, K. W., & Foreman, H.-C. (2025). Challenges and Potential of Antibody–Drug Conjugates as Prospective Tuberculosis Therapeutics. Microorganisms, 13(10), 2234. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms13102234

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop