Next Article in Journal
The Extrinsic Incubation Period of Zika Virus in Florida Mosquitoes Aedes aegypti and Ae. albopictus
Next Article in Special Issue
A Conserved Female-Specific Requirement for the GGT Gene in Mosquito Larvae Facilitates RNAi-Mediated Sex Separation in Multiple Species of Disease Vector Mosquitoes
Previous Article in Journal
Identification of Immunogenic Linear B-Cell Epitopes in C. burnetii Outer Membrane Proteins Using Immunoinformatics Approaches Reveals Potential Targets of Persistent Infections
Previous Article in Special Issue
Suspected Severe Malaria in a Sudanese Patient Affected by Sickle Cell Disease Who Was Treated with Hydroxyurea
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Pathogens
Volume 10
Issue 10
10.3390/pathogens10101251
pathogens-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
Correction published on 23 August 2022, see Pathogens 2022, 11(9), 956.
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

A Broad-Based Mosquito Yeast Interfering RNA Pesticide Targeting Rbfox1 Represses Notch Signaling and Kills Both Larvae and Adult Mosquitoes

by
Keshava Mysore
1,2,
Longhua Sun
1,2,
Limb K. Hapairai
1,2,
Chien-Wei Wang
2,3,
Joseph B. Roethele
1,2,
Jessica Igiede
2,4,
Max P. Scheel
1,2,
Nicholas D. Scheel
2,4,
Ping Li
1,2,
Na Wei
2,3,
David W. Severson
1,2,4,5 and
Molly Duman-Scheel
1,2,*
1
Department of Medical and Molecular Genetics, Indiana University School of Medicine, Raclin-Carmichael Hall, 1234 Notre Dame Ave., South Bend, IN 46617, USA
2
Eck Institute for Global Health, The University of Notre Dame, South Bend, IN 46556, USA
3
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering and Earth Sciences, The University of Notre Dame, South Bend, IN 46556, USA
4
Department of Biological Sciences, The University of Notre Dame, South Bend, IN 46556, USA
5
Department of Life Sciences, The University of the West Indies, St. Augustine, Trinidad and Tobago
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Pathogens 2021, 10(10), 1251; https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens10101251
Submission received: 1 September 2021 / Revised: 21 September 2021 / Accepted: 23 September 2021 / Published: 28 September 2021 / Corrected: 23 August 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Mosquito-Borne Diseases: Novel Control Strategies)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

Prevention of mosquito-borne infectious diseases will require new classes of environmentally safe insecticides and novel mosquito control technologies. Saccharomyces cerevisiae was engineered to express short hairpin RNA (shRNA) corresponding to mosquito Rbfox1 genes. The yeast induced target gene silencing, resulting in larval death that was observed in both laboratory and outdoor semi-field trials conducted on Aedes aegypti. High levels of mortality were also observed during simulated field trials in which adult females consumed yeast delivered through a sugar bait. Mortality correlated with defects in the mosquito brain, in which a role for Rbfox1 as a positive regulator of Notch signaling was identified. The larvicidal and adulticidal activities of the yeast were subsequently confirmed in trials conducted on Aedes albopictus, Anopheles gambiae, and Culex quinquefasciatus, yet the yeast had no impact on survival of select non-target arthropods. These studies indicate that yeast RNAi pesticides targeting Rbfox1 could be further developed as broad-based mosquito larvicides and adulticides for deployment in integrated biorational mosquito control programs. These findings also suggest that the species-specificity of attractive targeted sugar baits, a new paradigm for vector control, could potentially be enhanced through RNAi technology, and specifically through the use of yeast-based interfering RNA pesticides.

1. Introduction

Although vector control is the primary mechanism for mosquito-borne disease prevention, resistance to all classes of chemical insecticides has been documented worldwide in a variety of disease vector mosquitoes [1]. The potential for unintended deleterious impacts of insecticides on non-target target organisms, including humans, is also of concern and is continuously monitored [2]. Given these issues, the successful prevention of arthropod-borne infectious diseases will require new classes of environmentally safe insecticides and novel mosquito control technologies [3]. RNAi, an innate eukaryotic regulatory pathway that silences gene expression through the generation of small interfering RNA (siRNA), has been successfully applied in the laboratory for the functional characterization of genes in many species, including mosquitoes [1,4]. Recent efforts have focused on the potential translation of RNAi technology, which has attracted interest in the agricultural pest control community [5], to the field for mosquito control [1,4]. Laboratory screens [6,7] led to the discovery of siRNAs which correspond to genes that are required for mosquito larval survival. Several of these siRNAs target genes that are required at multiple stages of the mosquito life cycle, thereby functioning as both larvicides and adulticides [8,9]. Moreover, a subgroup of these siRNAs correspond to genetic target sites that are conserved in Aedes (dengue, Zika, yellow fever and chikungunya vector), Culex (West Nile and lymphatic filariasis vector), and Anopheles (malaria vector) species, but which have not yet been found to be identically conserved in the sequenced genomes of non-target organisms [9,10,11]. It was hypothesized that these interfering RNA pesticides (IRPs) will kill multiple types of mosquitoes during the larval and adult stages, yet pose little or no threat to non-target organisms. To further evaluate this hypothesis, the present investigation pursued characterization of a putative adulticidal and larvicidal IRP with a conserved target site in mosquito Rbfox1 genes.
Rbfox1 genes, which are also known as Ataxin 2-binding protein (A2BP1) genes, encode evolutionarily conserved RNA binding proteins that function as critical regulators of neural and muscular development in divergent species [12,13,14]. Human A2BP1 was identified as an Ataxin 2-associated nuclear RNA-binding protein that was found to be linked to type 2 spinocerebellar ataxia [15] and which has been associated with a number of other human disorders, including autism, epilepsy, and cardiac hypertrophy [12]. A conserved RRM domain facilitates sequence-specific binding to UGCAUG motifs located in pre-mRNA introns, 3′ UTRS, and pre-miRNA hairpins, permitting the regulation of splicing, mRNA stability, translation, and the processing of miRNAs by Rbfox1 proteins [12,16]. Rbfox1 also promotes ribonucleoprotein granule formation and cell survival [17]. In Drosophila melanogaster, Rbfox1 is known to regulate germ cell development [18,19] wing development [20,21], memory [22], the cellular immune response [23], and neurogenesis [13]. In the developing nervous system of D. melanogaster, the role of Rbfox1 has been best characterized in the developing sensory system [13], in which Rbfox1 was found to promote sensory organ specification by potentiating Notch signaling. Rbfox1 was proposed to function as part of the Suppressor of Hairless complex, which in the presence of activated Notch (N), regulates expression of Enhancer of split-Complex (E(spl)-C) target genes [13]. Loss of Rbfox1 expression in the early fly embryo was linked to a reduction in neuronal cell number [24], suggesting that Rbfox1 regulates Notch signaling at multiple stages of D. melanogaster development.
In this investigation, the effects of silencing the Rbfox1 gene in multiple species of disease vector mosquitoes was examined. Loss of Rbfox1 has been associated with larval and adult death in D. melanogaster [21,25], supporting the hypothesis, which was examined here through RNAi-mediated silencing experiments, that loss of Rbfox1 function in mosquitoes could result in death at multiple stages of the mosquito life cycle. This study also describes, for the first time, the development of a yeast IRP-based ATSB system for control of adult mosquitoes. The results of these studies suggest that IRPs directed against Rbfox1 genes may represent a new biorational intervention that could one day be applied for control of multiple species of disease vector mosquitoes at different stages of the mosquito life cycle.

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. Silencing Rbfox1 Results in A. aegypti Larval Mortality

Rbfox1.457 siRNA corresponds to a target sequence in Rbfox1 that is conserved in multiple species of disease vector mosquitoes (Table S1) [26]. With the exception of mosquitoes, this target site was not identified in sequenced genomes [27] other than that of the disease vector sand flies Lutzomyia longipalpus and Phlebotomus papatasi [28], or the black soldier fly Hermetia illucens (Table S1). Rbfox1.457 siRNA was used to examine if the Rbfox1 gene is required for mosquito viability. The siRNA was evaluated in A. aegypti, in which it induced significant fourth instar larval mortality following brief soaking treatments in 0.5 µg/µL Rbfox1.457 siRNA (Table 1). Likewise, significant mortality was observed in A. aegypti adult females within six days following microinjection of Rbfox1.457 siRNA into the adult thorax (Table 1). The results of these studies demonstrated that this siRNA has both larvicidal and adulticidal activities in A. aegypti, supporting the hypothesis that A. aegypti, like D. melanogaster, requires Rbfox1 activity at multiple stages of the mosquito life cycle.

2.2. Sugar Baited Delivery of Rbfox1.457 siRNA

The identification of field-appropriate mechanisms for delivery of IRPs to mosquitoes has been central to ongoing research efforts [4]. Attractive targeted sugar baits (ATSBs) are a new paradigm for mosquito control that exploits the innate sugar feeding behavior of female and male mosquitoes, which typically feed on natural sugar sources [29]. This sugar feeding behavior permits mosquito control through deployment of sugar baits that have been laced with insecticide. Although sugar baits can facilitate targeted delivery of a variety of insecticides, insecticide resistance is nevertheless of concern [30], and the development of new classes of pesticides, such as IRPs, which could one day be delivered as second-generation ATSBs, may therefore be advantageous. To this end, Rbfox1.457 siRNA was evaluated in a simulated field study using a sugar bait delivery system which had been described previously [8,9]. Adult female mosquitoes were permitted to feed on sugar bait alone, sugar bait with control siRNA, or sugar bait with Rbfox1.457 siRNA. Feeding rates among A. aegypti females, which are shown in Table 2, were comparable to those reported in similar trials with other siRNAs [8,9]. As previously observed, no significant differences in A. aegypti feeding rates were detected among the various treatments (p > 0.05). Although adult mortality among mosquitoes fed with sugar bait alone or control siRNA sugar bait was negligible (Table 1), Rbfox1.457 siRNA ATSB feedings resulted in significant mortality in A. aegypti adult females, with 77 ± 7.1% mortality detected within six days following consumption of Rbfox1.457 siRNA sugar meals (Table 1).

2.3. Development of an RNAi-Based Yeast Pesticide That Can Be Deployed as an ATSB

Although the high rates of mortality induced by Rbfox1.457 siRNAs suggest that this technology could facilitate mosquito control, the high cost of siRNAs could impede broad use of siRNA pesticides in the field [4]. To address this, S. cerevisiae has been used to express shRNAs corresponding to insecticidal siRNAs, facilitating cost-efficient interfering RNA production during yeast cultivation [31]. Genetically modified strains in which shRNA has been expressed can be cultured, then heat-inactivated, dried, and fed to mosquito larvae [6], suggesting that it might also be possible to engineer Rbfox1.457 yeast that could be used in the development of yeast IRP-based ATSBs for adult mosquito control. To this end, stably transformed S. cerevisiae expressing shRNA corresponding to Rbfox1.457 siRNA (hereafter referred to as Rbfox1.457 yeast) was generated by integrating two Rbfox1.457 shRNA expression cassettes into S. cerevisiae. shRNA expression was confirmed through amplification of cDNA generated from total RNA that had been prepared from the yeast strain (Figure 1a).
Prior to using the Rbfox1.457 strain in the development of a yeast ATSB system, the insecticidal activity of this strain was first confirmed in larvae. Larval consumption of this yeast led to a 91 ± 2% reduction in Rbfox1 transcripts in the A. aegypti larval brain (Figure 1b). Consumption of the yeast also resulted in 91 ± 2% larval mortality with respect to larvae reared on control interfering RNA yeast, in which shRNA with no known target in mosquitoes had been expressed (Figure 1c; p < 0.001 vs. control). A majority of treated larvae died within eight days by the fourth instar of larval development, while larvae consuming the control yeast survived until adulthood (see survival curve in Figure 1e). The dosage of Rbfox1.457 correlated directly with the percentage of larval mortality (Figure 1f), with the LD50 determined to be 28 mg. Larvicide activity was also verified in semi-field trials conducted at an outdoor rooftop laboratory in Notre Dame, IN, where 93 ± 1% larval mortality was observed following Rbfox1.457 treatment (Figure 1d; p < 0.001 vs. control). These studies, combined with previous studies in which yeast IRP larvicides were shown to function in different types of water [10,11] and in an assortment of different sized containers with varied water volumes and larval densities [6,10,11,32,33] provide further evidence that yeast IRPs may represent a new larvicidal intervention, adding Rbfox1.457 to the growing arsenal of yeast larvicides.
Based on these findings in larvae, Rbfox1.457 yeast was used in the development of an Rbfox1.457 ATSB-based yeast delivery system for targeting adult mosquitoes. Inactivated, lyophilized, powdered yeast was added to red-dyed sugar-bait solutions. Gellan gum was included to help prevent yeast ATSB desiccation, and benzoic acid was used as a preservative to hinder growth of contaminating microbes in the ATSB, which was delivered in small centrifuge tubes that had been cut, exposing a droplet of yeast ATSB from the tubes. The resulting yeast ATSB feeders were hung in mosquito cages, in which A. aegypti adult females congregated to and drank from the feeders (Figure 2a). Highly increased feeding rates were observed with respect to 4-h delivery of siRNA-ATSBs (Table 2), with yeast ATSB consumption (which was tracked through the presence of red dye in the abdomens of engorged females, Figure 2b) confirmed in 100% of adult female mosquitoes (Table 2). A mortality of 87 ± 2% was observed in mosquitoes that consumed Rbfox1.457 yeast in 5% sucrose sugar bait solution (Figure 2c, p < 0.001 with respect to control yeast in 5% sugar bait). Rbfox1.457 yeast killed a majority of A. aegypti mosquitoes within 3–4 days of initiating treatment (Figure 2e). The percentage mortality correlated with the concentration of Rbfox1.457 yeast in the ATSB (Figure 2d; LC50 = 0.1525 µg/µL ATSB). It is possible that generation of yeast strains that express higher levels of shRNA could lead to even higher mortality rates, and this possibility can be explored in future studies. However, it will be interesting to repeat these studies in the field, where mortality rates could increase to 100% when mosquitoes are subjected to IRP treatments in conjunction with environmental stresses.

2.4. Silencing Rbfox1 Represses Notch Signaling

The mode of action for Rbfox1 IRPs was next examined. As noted above, Rbfox1 is known to be required in a variety of different tissues, including the nervous system [13]. Given that many of the lethal IRPs characterized in recent years have significant impacts on the mosquito central nervous system (CNS; [6,7,8]), this study focused on characterizing the role of Rbfox1 in the mosquito brain. Rbfox1 potentiates Notch signaling in the D. melanogaster sensory system [13], suggesting that Rbfox1 could function as a potentiator of Notch signaling in the mosquito brain. Silencing Rbfox1 transcripts in the A. aegypti female brain (Figure 3(a1–a3), p < 0.001 vs. control interfering RNA yeast-treated females) led to a significant decrease in Notch transcripts (Figure 3(b1–b3)), p < 0.001 vs. control interfering RNA yeast-fed females). Expression of sanpodo (spdo), another key component of the Notch signaling pathway [34], was also assessed. A significant 84 ± 1% reduction in spdo transcripts was detected in adult females following Rbfox1 silencing (Figure 3(c1–c3), p < 0.001). This significant loss of Notch and spdo expression suggest that loss of viability following Rbfox1 silencing results, at least in part, from loss of critical Notch signaling in the mosquito CNS. These results suggest that in addition to regulating E(spl)-C target genes [13], Rbfox1 impacts the expression of Notch itself, as well as spdo. These impacts on Notch and spdo expression, which have not to our knowledge been reported in the past, could have potential implications for the known associations of Rbfox1/A2BP1 to human disease states [12], a topic that could be further explored.

2.5. Rbfox1.457 Yeast Pesticides Function as Broad-Range Mosquito Insecticides but Are Not Found to Be Toxic to Select Non-Target Arthropods

The target site of Rbfox1 IRPs is identically conserved in multiple species of disease vector mosquitoes, including multiple Anopheles spp., A. albopictus, and C. quinquefasciatus (Table S1). Based on the results obtained for A. aegypti (Figure 1 and Figure 2), it was therefore hypothesized that Rbfox1.457 yeast could function as a broad-range mosquito IRP that can kill both adults and larvae of multiple mosquito species. To evaluate this hypothesis, Rbfox1.457 yeast ATSB was assessed in A. gambiae, in which 100% feeding rates, which were comparable to those observed for Rbfox1.457 yeast in A. aegypti, were noted (Table 2). 93 ± 1% adult mortality was observed in A. gambiae adult females that had consumed Rbfox1.457 ATSB (Figure 4a, p < 0.001 compared to control-yeast treated adults in which only 1 ± 1% mortality was observed). As observed in A. aegypti, silencing of Rbfox1 in A. gambiae (Figure S1(a1–a3)) resulted in decreased expression of A. gambiae Notch (Figure S1(b1–b3)) and spdo transcripts (Figure S1(c1–c3)). Rbfox1.457 yeast consumption also resulted in significant 89 ± 4% mortality in A. albopictus (Figure 4c, p < 0.001 vs. control-yeast treated adults) and 81 ± 4% C. quinquefasciatus (Figure 4b, p < 0.001 vs. control-yeast treated adults), with high female feeding rates (90% and 100%, respectively) observed in these species (Table 2).
Likewise, Rbfox1.457 yeast treatments resulted in 90 ± 2% larval mortality in A. gambiae larvae (Figure 4d, p < 0.001 vs. control yeast treatment), 91 ± 2% mortality in C. quinquefasciatus larvae (Figure 4e; p < 0.001 vs. control yeast treatment), and 90 ± 2% larval mortality in A. albopictus (Figure 4f, p < 0.001 vs. control yeast treatment). As observed with other yeast IRPs [10,11], 100% mortality was achieved in some, but not all containers. Although this raises the question of whether a proportion of the mosquitoes are resistant to RNAi, no loss of sensitivity to yeast IRPs has been observed in studies to date. Instead, previous work indicated that 100% killing rates are induced by yeast IRPs when larvae are reared as individuals, preventing consumption of dead larvae in the container and resulting in higher kill rates [10,11], a phenomenon that should be investigated in future field trials.
Although Rbfox1.457 IRPs kill larvae and adults of several mosquito species (Figure 1, Figure 2 and Figure 4), these IRPs were not found to have activity in several non-target arthropods, including the crustacean Daphnia magna, the fruit fly D. melanogaster, Hippodamia convergens (lady beetle), Oncopeltus fasciatus (milkweed bug), or Tribolium castaneum (flour beetle; Table 3). Cumulatively, these data support the hypothesis that Rbfox1.457 IRPs function as broad-based mosquito insecticides that kill both adults and larvae, yet have activity that poses little, if any threat to non-target species. If Rbfox1.457 IRPs are commercialized, it will be critical to pursue further toxicity testing in fish and other vertebrates in support of registry applications to the EPA or other regulatory bodies. Such testing can be pursued when commercial-ready insecticide formulations have been further developed and optimized.
Larviciding is a critical component of Aedes and Culex mosquito control programs, and the potential for adding a new class of larvicides to these programs is of interest, particularly given concerns for the emergence of resistance to existing larvicide classes [3,35,36,37]. Although Anopheles mosquito control programs have largely centered on targeting adults, larviciding is recommended in instances in which Anopheles breeding sites are fixed, few, and findable [36]. In recent years, long-lasting Bti larvicides are showing promise for control of A. gambiae and A. funestus larvae [38,39,40,41]. Moreover, the observation that Anopheles stephensi and A. aegypti share breeding containers [42] suggests that use of a larvicide that is capable of killing both Aedes and Anopheles larvae would be useful.
Adult control is also important for Aedes and Culex integrated mosquitoes control programs, for which ATSB technologies are presently being assessed [29]. ATSB-mediated delivery of a variety of broad-based adulticides, for example boric acid, encapsulated garlic oil, dinotefuran, and eugenol, have been applied for successful targeting of A. aegypti, A. albopictus, and other Aedes species [43,44,45,46,47,48,49]. Likewise, C. quinquefasciatus, Culex pipiens, Culex tarsalis, and a variety of other Culex species, including nuisance biters, have been successfully targeted with ATSBs containing insecticides such as boric acid, dinotefuran, eugenol, Spinosad, and encapsulated garlic oil [44,50,51,52]. ATSBs are also demonstrating great promise for targeting Anopheles malaria vector mosquitoes [53,54,55,56,57]. Despite these overwhelmingly positive findings, challenges for adoption and long-term use of this technology remain. Although ATSBs facilitate targeted delivery of a variety of pesticides, insecticide resistance is still a concern [29]. Furthermore, while the addition of protective membrane barriers to bait stations [58], as well as efforts to limit ATSB applications to non-flowering vegetation have decreased the potential for harming non-target organisms, it is difficult to completely eliminate all non-target risks associated with most ATSB formulations, which are not specific to mosquitoes [29]. Mosquito-specific biorational yeast IRPs could therefore hold the potential to significantly enhance ATSB technology. IRPs have a highly desirable safety profile, particularly when compared to many currently used conventional pesticides [59], and the lack of Rbfox1.457 toxicity observed in select non-target arthropods (Table 3) suggests that this yeast IRP could enhance the species-specificity of ATSBs.
As noted above, outside of mosquitoes, the Rbfox1.457 target sequence was identified in the sand flies Lutzomyia longipalpus and Phlebotomus papatasi (Table S1), which vector parasites that cause visceral leishmaniasis [28]. Although Rbfox1.457 IRPs could potentially kill sand fly larvae, the breeding sites of sand flies are diverse [60,61], and it may therefore be more straightforward to use the yeast to target adults. Sugar baits that impact sand fly viability and which block parasite transmission are being developed and evaluated in L. longipalpus with the goal of conceptualizing new strategies for controlling this vector [62,63]. It would therefore be interesting to evaluate Rbfox1.457 yeast sugar baits in sand flies. Based on results observed in mosquitoes, the yeast adulticidal activity may be faster-acting than beta-glycosidic ATSBs that were previously evaluated [62], yet potentially retain the environmentally-friendly nature of these insecticides. It would also be interesting to evaluate if the increased consumption of yeast-based ATSBs observed in mosquitoes is retained in sand flies.

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. Mosquito Rearing

Mosquito strains used in this study included: A. albopictus Gainesville (BEI Resources, NIAID, NIH: MRA-804, contributed by Sandra A. Allan), A. aegypti Liverpool-IB12 (LVP-IB12), A. gambiae G3 (BEI Resources, NIAID, NIH: Eggs, MRA-112, contributed by Mark Q. Benedict), and C. quinquefasciatus JHB (provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention for distribution by BEI Resources, NIAID, NIH: Eggs, NR-43025). These mosquitoes were reared as described [64] in the insectary, which was maintained at 26.5 °C, with a 12 h dark/12 h light cycle that included 1 h crepuscular periods at the beginning and end of each cycle, and at ~80% relative humidity. An artificial membrane (Hemotek Limited, Blackburn, UK) was used to deliver commercially acquired sheep blood (HemoStat Laboratories, Dixon, CA, USA).

3.2. Identification of siRNA #457

siRNA #457, which corresponds to a conserved target sequence identified in the Rbfox1 genes of many disease vector mosquitoes (see gene identification numbers in Table S1) was assessed in A. aegypti through larval soaking [6,7] and adult microinjection studies [8,9] as described. In summary, larval soaking was performed per the Singh et al. [65] protocol using 20 μL of 0.5 μg/μL siRNA to treat first instar (L1) larvae for four hours. These soaking trials were performed in duplicate experiments, each which were conducted on 20 larvae (n = 40 larvae evaluated in total per treatment) that were reared to adulthood and assessed as described in the World Health Organization (WHO) larvicide testing guidelines [66] following soaking treatments. Data were evaluated using the Fisher’s exact test. siRNAs used in these studies were purchased from Integrated DNA Technologies (Coralville, IA, USA) and corresponded to the following sequences #457: 5′-UAAUAGUAGCGAUGCGGAGCGAGCA-3′ in Rbfox1 (AAEL019934), as well as a control sequence that does not have a known target in mosquitoes [67]: 5′-GAAGAGCACUGAUAGAUGUUAGCGU-3′. For analysis of the adulticidal activity, as previously detailed [6,7], three-day old non-blood fed adult females were anesthetized with carbon dioxide gas and microinjected in the thoracic region with 250 nL of 9 μg/μL Rbfox1.457 or control siRNA. Adults were placed in a cage to recover following injections, and adult mortality was assessed daily for the next week. Twenty individuals were injected per treatment in each of four total replicate experiments. Microinjection data were analyzed using the Fisher’s exact test.

3.3. Adult siRNA-ATSB Trials

ATSB trials with siRNA were performed as detailed previously [8,9]. In summary, baits consisted of 64 μL of 5% sucrose solution (in sterile DEPC-treated water) containing 0.5% of red tracer dye (McCormick) alone or with 2.5 μg/μL of control or Rbfox1.457 siRNA delivered from a cotton wick in a cut 0.2 mL microfuge tube placed in a 3.75 L cage (Berry Global, Evansville, IN, USA). In each of 3 trials, 25 4–5-day-old adult females that had not blood fed were sugar starved for 48 h prior to four-hour sugar bait feedings carried out at dawn. Engorged females were collected as individuals, and survival was scored daily for six days. Three biological replicate experiments were conducted (n = 75 adult females in total assessed per treatment). Feeding rates were evaluated with the G-test of independence, and the log-rank test was used to compare survival rates among treatments.

3.4. Generation of Yeast Interfering RNA Larvicide Strains and Yeast Culturing

Custom DNA oligonucleotides encoding an shRNA expression cassette which corresponds to the Rbfox1.457 target site, 5′-TAATAGTAGCGATGCGGAGCG-3′, were purchased from Invitrogen Life Technologies (Carlsbad, CA, USA) and used to generate transformants with the shRNA expression cassette stably integrated into the TRP1 and URA3 sites of the S. cerevisiae CEN.PK strain [genotype MATa/α ura3-52/ura3-52 trp1-289/trp1-289 leu2-3_112/leu2-3_112 his3 Δ1/his3 Δ1 MAL2-8C/MAL2-8C SUC2/SUC2 [68]] yeast using previously described methodology [6]. This strain, hereafter referred to as Rbfox1.457 yeast IRP, as well as a comparable control shRNA expression strain [6] that had been constructed previously, which corresponds to the control siRNA sequence, were cultured as described [6]. Dried inactivated yeast interfering RNA tablets were prepared as previously described for use in larvicide assays [69]. Yeast utilized in ATSB trials was cultured in a similar manner, except that the yeast was pelleted and subsequently lyophilized using a Labconco FreeZone 6 L Console Freeze Dryer following culturing.

3.5. Larvicide Trials

3.5.1. Laboratory Assays

Larvicide trials that conformed to the WHO larvicide testing guidelines [66] were performed in the insectary as previously described [69]. Thirteen replicate container trials were performed, each with 20 first instar larvae (n = 260 larvae total per treatment) that had been placed in 50 mL of distilled water in a 500 mL container. In each container, larvae were provided with a single 50 mg yeast tablet (either Rbfox1.457 or control) that was provided at the onset of each trial, and which was sufficient to permit feeding ad libitum throughout the trial. Containers were assessed for larval mortality throughout the trial period, and the percentages of larval mortality were transformed using arcsine transformation as described [66] at the conclusion of each trial, with data analyzed using the Student’s t-test.
Previously described methodology [6,7] was used to generate dose–response curves following analysis of a variety of yeast dosages (n = 180 larvae per dosage). Dose–response data were analyzed using SPSS 25 software (IMB, Armonk, NY, USA) and log dosage–probit mortality to generate LD50 values with 95% confidence intervals.

3.5.2. Semi-Field Trials

Semi-field larvicide trials were performed in accordance with the WHO larvicide testing guidelines [66] in June and July 2019 at an outdoor rooftop laboratory in Notre Dame, IN as previously described [10,11]. LVP-IB12 strain A. aegypti mosquitoes were used in these assays, in which larvae were placed in 7.5 L containers (diameter = 23 cm, height = 25 cm). Nineteen replicate container trials, each with 20 larvae, were assessed per yeast treatment (n = 380 larvae per treatment assessed in total). The percentages of larval mortality were transformed using arcsine transformation, and data from multiple replicate experiments were assessed with a Student’s t-test. Outdoor temperatures ranged from 9 °C to 35 °C during the trial period, with a mean daytime temperature of 23.5 ± 5 °C and nighttime temperature of 19 ± 4 °C and an average 75 ± 15% relative humidity level.

3.5.3. Yeast ATSB Simulated Field Trials

The yeast ATSB solution was prepared by mixing 40 mg of lyophilized yeast (Rbfox1.457 or control) containing 0.1% benzoic acid with 100 μL of a gellan gum (Phytagel brand from Sigma Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) and sucrose stock solution containing 4.5 μL of red tracer dye (McCormick’s) in a 1.5 mL microfuge tube; for A. gambiae experiments, the amount of yeast was reduced from 40 to 20 mg per 100 μL of ATSB, as adults of this species are smaller in size and require less interfering RNA [8,9]. The gellan gum and sugar stock solution used in this mixture was prepared by heating 60 mL of autoclaved distilled water on a hot plate to 65 °C with constant stirring, to which 0.05 g of gellan gum, was added and the temperature increased to 90 °C while maintaining stirring. After the gellan gum was in solution (~20 min), 5 g of sucrose was added to the solution, which was then cooled to 60 °C, and the total volume brought to 100 mL through the addition of water. To prepare the feeders, the bottom of the microfuge tube was scored with a razor blade without puncturing the tube, which was subsequently capped and punctured using a thumbtack before hanging the yeast wick feeder facing down at the top of the experimental cage. Twenty-five non-blood fed 5–6-day-old adult females that had been sugar starved for 48 h were allowed to feed for four hours from two feeders placed in 3.75 L insect cages. Following confirmation of engorgement, survival was scored daily for six days. These trials were performed in triplicate. Feeding rates were evaluated with the G-test of independence, and ANOVA was used to compare survival rates. Dose-response curves for Rbfox1.457 yeast ATSB were produced and evaluated as described above for the yeast larvicides.

3.6. Whole Mount In Situ Hybridization

The Patel [70] protocol was used for synthesis of riboprobes corresponding to the A. aegypti Rbf1 (AAEL019934), Notch (AAEL023745), and spdo (AAEL026911) genes, as well as the A. gambiae Rbf1 (Table S1), Notch (AGAP001015), and spdo (AGAP002689) genes and used for in situ hybridization experiments that were performed on adult female brains as previously described [71]. Four biological replicate experiments were conducted on larvae that had been fed with control or Rbfox1.457 yeasts as described above. Following processing, the brain tissues were mounted, then viewed and imaged with a Zeiss Axioimager (Carl Zeiss Microscopy, LLC, Thornwood, NY, USA) equipped with a Spot Flex camera (Diagnostic Instruments, Inc. Sterling Heights, MI, USA). FIJI ImageJ software [72] was used to evaluate mean gray values (average signal intensity over the selected area) which facilitated quantification of digoxigenin-labeled transcript signals in the brains of Rbfox1.457- or control-treated mosquitoes as described [73]. These transcript data were evaluated with the Student’s t-test.

3.7. Evaluation of Non-target Species

Yeast toxicity was assessed as previously described [8,9] in D. melanogaster, T. castaneum, and D. magna. O. fasciatus and H. convergens were evaluated as follows:

3.7.1. O. fasciatus

Adults were obtained from Carolina Biologicals (Burlington, NC, USA) and reared according to the provider’s instructions. For the toxicity assays, in each of two biological replicate experiments, 20 individuals were fed a slurry of 200 μL of 10% sucrose mixed with red food dye and 50 mg of either control or Rbfox1.457 yeast. This slurry was provided to the insects via a wick-containing 0.5 mL tube that was suspended inside the cage throughout the trial period. The cages were stored at room temperature (21 °C) and monitored for six days. Feeding was confirmed by observation of individual feeding bouts and the presence of red dye in the insect excrement. The number of adults that survived after six days was recorded, and data were analyzed with the Fisher’s exact text.

3.7.2. H. convergens

Adults were obtained from Carolina Biologicals and reared in cages stored at room temperature (21 °C) according to the provider’s instructions. Toxicity assays were conducted as described for O. fasciatus, except that the yeast ATSB was provided to 10 insects in a small dish throughout each of two trials.

4. Conclusions

The results of this study suggest that Rbfox1.457 yeast, a dual-action adulticidal and larvicidal IRP with a target site conserved in the Rbfox1 gene of many species of mosquitoes (Table S1), could potentially be used as a new means of controlling Aedes, Anopheles, and Culex mosquitoes at multiple stages of the mosquito life cycle (Figure 1, Figure 2 and Figure 4). Silencing Rbfox1 resulted in significant decreases in Notch and spdo transcripts, a result that had not previously been described in other species (Figure 3 and Figure S1). This critical role in Notch signaling, a key cellular signaling mechanism, correlated with a critical requirement for Rbfox1 for mosquito viability. These studies also demonstrated that Rbfox1.457 IRPs, which did not impact survival of several non-target arthropods evaluated in this investigation (Table 3), can be effectively delivered to adult mosquitoes in the form of an ATSB (Figure 2 and Figure 4). Discovery that yeast-based IRPs can be delivered to mosquitoes as ATSBs greatly improves the potential for affordable and scalable use of RNAi-based adulticides. Moreover, development and characterization of Rbfox1.457 yeast IRP (Figure 1 and Figure 4) added one more larvicide to the growing collection of larvicidal IRPs, an arsenal which could be used to combat resistance, should it develop, to any single yeast IRP [4,31]. Confirmation of Rbfox1.457 yeast ATSB activity in simulated field trials (Figure 2 and Figure 4) and Rbfox1.457 yeast larvicide activity in semi-field trials (Figure 1d) suggests that IRP technology could potentially be implemented successfully in the field. This will of course need to be evaluated in larger-scale field trials, which should focus on residual activity of the IRP following deployment, a critical factor that must be evaluated in order to completely assess the potential for using these insecticides as a new mosquito control intervention.
Hunter et al. [74] previously demonstrated in a large-scale field trial, under natural beekeeping conditions, that RNAi could be used to prevent Apis mellifera infections with Israeli Acute Paralysis Virus. Their study, which was performed in two discrete climates, seasons, and geographical locations, demonstrated that the dsRNA could be successfully delivered in sugar water. However, the bees were treated twice per week during the trial period. Less frequent applications of ATSBs would be ideal for mosquito control, suggesting that the development of long-lasting formulations would be a worthwhile endeavor. The development of encapsulated stable formulations that promote yeast IRP stability in various environmental conditions, both prior to and during use, will be important. Encapsulation of the yeast could also facilitate controlled and extended IRP release, which is likely an essential component of developing commercial products with suitable residual activity [31]. In preparation for large-scale field trials, it will also be useful to scale production of yeast strains that express insecticidal shRNA, and this may require further research and development [31]. The results of this investigation indicate that pursuit of these endeavors could significantly advance mosquito control efforts.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/pathogens10101251/s1, Table S1: Conservation of the Rbfox1.457 yeast IRP target site in mosquitoes. The Rbfox1.457 yeast target site is conserved in the Rbfox1 genes of multiple disease vector mosquitoes. Outside of H. illucens, L. longipalpis, and P. papatasi, no other identical 21 bp target site was found in the genomes of non-target species found in the National Center Biotechnology Information (NCBI) database [27]. Figure S1: Rbfox1.457 yeast ATSB results in target gene silencing and significantly impacts Notch signaling in A. gambiae. Rbfox1.457 ATSB consumption resulted in a significant reduction in Rbfox1 (A), Notch (B), and spdo (C) transcripts in the A. gambiae adult female brain. The numbers of brains analyzed (n) are indicated below each bar in the graphs; *** = p < 0.001 vs. sugar bait alone or sugar bait with control yeast; data were analyzed with Student’s t-test. Figure S2: Original gel for panel 1a (both unlabeled and labeled).

Author Contributions

Conceptualization: M.D.-S.; methodology: K.M., L.S., M.D.-S., N.W. and L.K.H.; validation: K.M., L.S., C.-W.W., L.K.H., N.D.S., J.I., M.P.S., L.S.; formal analysis: K.M., M.D.-S.; investigation: K.M., L.S., C.-W.W., L.K.H., P.L., J.B.R., N.D.S., J.I., M.P.S., L.S.; formal analysis: K.M., M.D.-S.; data curation: K.M., J.B.R., M.D.-S.; writing—original draft preparation: K.M., M.D.-S.; writing—review and editing: K.M., M.D.-S., D.W.S.; supervision: K.M., N.W., M.D.-S.; project administration: N.W., D.W.S., M.D.-S.; funding acquisition: M.D.-S., D.W.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by an Indiana University Showalter Scholar award to MDS (lar vicide screen), the Department of the Army, U.S. Army Contracting Command, Aberdeen Proving Ground, Natick Contracting Division, Fort Detrick, MD, USA under Deployed Warfighter Protection (DWFP) Program Grant W911QY-17-1-0002 to MDS (Aedes aegypti adulticide), The National Institutes of Health/National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Award 1 R21 AI128116-01 (yeast strain generation and larvicide testing) to MDS, DWS, and NW, an Innovative Vector Control Consortium (IVCC) Award (Anopheles adulticide) to MDS, and a United States Department of Defense Award W81XWH-17-1-0294 to MDS and DWS (semi-field larvicidal ovitrap trials). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

All data is provided within the text and Supplementary Materials.

Acknowledgments

Thanks to members of our labs for useful discussions and to Scott Emrich for assistance with the identification of conserved target sites in mosquitoes. Thanks to Joi Misenti and Jacob Realey for technical support.

Conflicts of Interest

M.D.S., N.W. and D.W.S. were named as inventors on a pending patent application related to this work (U.S. Application No.: 62/361,704, European Application No. 17828458.4), but the application did not impact data interpretation nor their adherence to journal policies on sharing data and materials. All other authors have no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Airs, P.M.; Bartholomay, L.C. RNA interference for mosquito and mosquito-borne disease control. Insects 2017, 8, 4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Environmental Protection Agency. Pesticides. Available online: https://www.epa.gov/pesticides (accessed on 1 March 2019).
  3. World Health Organization. Dengue Guidelines for Diagnosis, Treatment, Prevention and Control; WHO: Geneva, Switzerland, 2009. [Google Scholar]
  4. Wiltshire, R.M.; Duman-Scheel, M. Advances in oral RNAi for disease vector mosquito research and control. Curr. Opin. Insect Sci. 2020, 40, 18–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Zhang, J.; Khan, S.A.; Heckel, D.G.; Bock, R. Next-generation insect-resistant plants: RNAi-mediated crop protection. Trends Biotechnol. 2017, 35, 871–882. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Hapairai, L.K.; Mysore, K.; Chen, Y.; Harper, E.I.; Scheel, M.P.; Lesnik, A.M.; Sun, L.; Severson, D.W.; Wei, N.; Duman-Scheel, M. Lure-and-kill yeast interfering RNA larvicides targeting neural genes in the human disease vector mosquito Aedes aegypti. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 13223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Mysore, K.; Hapairai, L.K.; Sun, L.; Harper, E.I.; Chen, Y.; Eggleson, K.K.; Realey, J.S.; Scheel, N.D.; Severson, D.W.; Wei, N.; et al. Yeast interfering RNA larvicides targeting neural genes induce high rates of Anopheles larval mortality. Malar. J. 2017, 16, 461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Hapairai, L.K.; Mysore, K.; Sun, L.; Li, P.; Wang, C.W.; Scheel, N.D.; Lesnik, A.; Scheel, M.P.; Igiede, J.; Wei, N.; et al. Characterization of an adulticidal and larvicidal interfering RNA pesticide that targets a conserved sequence in mosquito G protein-coupled dopamine 1 receptor genes. Insect Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2020, 120, 103359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Mysore, K.; Hapairai, L.K.; Sun, L.; Li, P.; Wang, C.W.; Scheel, N.D.; Lesnik, A.; Igiede, J.; Scheel, M.P.; Wei, N.; et al. Characterization of a dual-action adulticidal and larvicidal interfering RNA pesticide targeting the Shaker gene of multiple disease vector mosquitoes. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2020, 14, e0008479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Mysore, K.; Li, P.; Wang, C.W.; Hapairai, L.K.; Scheel, N.D.; Realey, J.S.; Sun, L.; Roethele, J.B.; Severson, D.W.; Wei, N.; et al. Characterization of a yeast interfering RNA larvicide with a target site conserved in the synaptotagmin gene of multiple disease vector mosquitoes. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2019, 13, e0007422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Mysore, K.; Li, P.; Wang, C.W.; Hapairai, L.K.; Scheel, N.D.; Realey, J.S.; Sun, L.; Severson, D.W.; Wei, N.; Duman-Scheel, M. Characterization of a broad-based mosquito yeast interfering RNA larvicide with a conserved target site in mosquito semaphorin-1a genes. Parasit. Vectors 2019, 12, 256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Conboy, J.G. Developmental regulation of RNA processing by Rbfox proteins. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. RNA 2017, 8, e1398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Shukla, J.P.; Deshpande, G.; Shashidhara, L.S. Ataxin 2-binding protein 1 is a context-specific positive regulator of Notch signaling during neurogenesis in Drosophila melanogaster. Development 2017, 144, 905–915. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Nikonova, E.; Kao, S.Y.; Ravichandran, K.; Wittner, A.; Spletter, M.L. Conserved functions of RNA-binding proteins in muscle. Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol. 2019, 110, 29–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Shibata, H.; Huynh, D.P.; Pulst, S.M. A novel protein with RNA-binding motifs interacts with ataxin-2. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2000, 9, 1303–1313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Gazzara, M.R.; Mallory, M.J.; Roytenberg, R.; Lindberg, J.P.; Jha, A.; Lynch, K.W.; Barash, Y. Ancient antagonism between CELF and RBFOX families tunes mRNA splicing outcomes. Genome Res. 2017, 27, 1360–1370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Kucherenko, M.M.; Shcherbata, H.R. Stress-dependent miR-980 regulation of Rbfox1/A2bp1 promotes ribonucleoprotein granule formation and cell survival. Nat. Commun. 2018, 9, 312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Tastan, O.Y.; Maines, J.Z.; Li, Y.; McKearin, D.M.; Buszczak, M. Drosophila ataxin 2-binding protein 1 marks an intermediate step in the molecular differentiation of female germline cysts. Development 2010, 137, 3167–3176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Carreira-Rosario, A.; Bhargava, V.; Hillebrand, J.; Kollipara, R.K.; Ramaswami, M.; Buszczak, M. Repression of Pumilio protein expression by Rbfox1 promotes germ cell differentiation. Dev. Cell 2016, 36, 562–571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Bajpai, R.; Sambrani, N.; Stadelmayer, B.; Shashidhara, L.S. Identification of a novel target of D/V signaling in Drosophila wing disc: Wg-independent function of the organizer. Gene Expr. Patterns 2004, 5, 113–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Usha, N.; Shashidhara, L.S. Interaction between Ataxin-2 Binding Protein 1 and Cubitus-interruptus during wing development in Drosophila. Dev. Biol. 2010, 341, 389–399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  22. Guven-Ozkan, T.; Busto, G.U.; Schutte, S.S.; Cervantes-Sandoval, I.; O’Dowd, D.K.; Davis, R.L. MiR-980 is a memory suppressor microRNA that regulates the autism-susceptibility gene A2bp1. Cell Rep. 2016, 14, 1698–1709. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  23. Nazario-Toole, A.E.; Robalino, J.; Okrah, K.; Corrada-Bravo, H.; Mount, S.M.; Wu, L.P. The splicing factor RNA-binding Fox Protein 1 mediates the cellular immune response in Drosophila melanogaster. J. Immunol. 2018, 201, 1154–1164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Koizumi, K.; Higashida, H.; Yoo, S.; Islam, M.S.; Ivanov, A.I.; Guo, V.; Pozzi, P.; Yu, S.H.; Rovescalli, A.C.; Tang, D.; et al. RNA interference screen to identify genes required for Drosophila embryonic nervous system development. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2007, 104, 5626–5631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Tunstall, N.E.; Herr, A.; de Bruyne, M.; Warr, C.G. A screen for genes expressed in the olfactory organs of Drosophila melanogaster identifies genes involved in olfactory behaviour. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e35641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Giraldo-Calderon, G.I.; Emrich, S.J.; MacCallum, R.M.; Maslen, G.; Dialynas, E.; Topalis, P.; Ho, N.; Gesing, S.; VectorBase, C.; Madey, G.; et al. VectorBase: An updated bioinformatics resource for invertebrate vectors and other organisms related with human diseases. Nucleic Acids Res. 2015, 43, D707–D713. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Sayers, E.W.; Beck, J.; Bolton, E.E.; Bourexis, D.; Brister, J.R.; Canese, K.; Comeau, D.C.; Funk, K.; Kim, S.; Klimke, W.; et al. Database resources of the National Center for Biotechnology Information. Nucleic Acids Res. 2021, 49, D10–D17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Sousa-Paula, L.C.; Otranto, D.; Dantas-Torres, F. Lutzomyia longipalpis (Sand Fly). Trends Parasitol. 2020, 36, 796–797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Fiorenzano, J.M.; Koehler, P.G.; Xue, R.D. Attractive toxic sugar bait (ATSB) for control of mosquitoes and its impact on non-target organisms: A review. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2017, 14, 398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Faraji, A.; Unlu, I. The eye of the tiger, the thrill of the gight: Effective larval and adult control measures against the Asian tiger mosquito, Aedes albopictus (Diptera: Culicidae), in North America. J. Med. Entomol. 2016, 53, 1029–1047. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Duman-Scheel, M. Saccharomyces cerevisiae (baker’s yeast) as an interfering RNA expression and delivery system. Curr. Drug Targets 2019, 20, 942–952. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Mysore, K.; Hapairai, L.K.; Li, P.; Roethele, J.B.; Sun, L.; Igiede, J.; Misenti, J.K.; Duman-Scheel, M. A functional requirement for sex-determination M/m locus region lncRNA genes in Aedes aegypti female larvae. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 10657. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Mysore, K.; Sun, L.; Roethele, J.B.; Li, P.; Igiede, J.; Misenti, J.K.; Duman-Scheel, M. A conserved female-specific larval requirement for MtnB function facilitates sex separation in multiple species of disease vector mosquitoes. Parasit. Vectors 2021, 14, 338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Skeath, J.B.; Doe, C.Q. Sanpodo and Notch act in opposition to Numb to distinguish sibling neuron fates in the Drosophila CNS. Development 1998, 125, 1857–1865. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Mulla, M.S. Larvicides and larvicidal formulations for the control of Culex pipiens fatigans. Bull. World Health Organ. 1967, 37, 311–315. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  36. World Health Organization. Larval Source Management: A Supplementary Measure for Malaria Vector Control: An Operational Manual; World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  37. Center for Disease Control. Larvicides. Available online: https://www.cdc.gov/mosquitoes/mosquito-control/community/larvicides.html (accessed on 3 July 2021).
  38. Afrane, Y.A.; Mweresa, N.G.; Wanjala, C.L.; Gilbreath III, T.M.; Zhou, G.; Lee, M.C.; Githeko, A.K.; Yan, G. Evaluation of long-lasting microbial larvicide for malaria vector control in Kenya. Malar. J. 2016, 15, 577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Kahindi, S.C.; Muriu, S.; Derua, Y.A.; Wang, X.; Zhou, G.; Lee, M.C.; Mwangangi, J.; Atieli, H.; Githeko, A.K.; Yan, G. Efficacy and persistence of long-lasting microbial larvicides against malaria vectors in western Kenya highlands. Parasit. Vectors 2018, 11, 438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Derua, Y.A.; Kweka, E.J.; Kisinza, W.N.; Githeko, A.K.; Mosha, F.W. Bacterial larvicides used for malaria vector control in sub-Saharan Africa: Review of their effectiveness and operational feasibility. Parasit. Vectors 2019, 12, 426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Derua, Y.A.; Kahindi, S.C.; Mosha, F.W.; Kweka, E.J.; Atieli, H.E.; Zhou, G.; Lee, M.C.; Githeko, A.K.; Yan, G. Susceptibility of Anopheles gambiae complex mosquitoes to microbial larvicides in diverse ecological settings in western Kenya. Med. Vet. Entomol. 2019, 33, 220–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Getachew, D.; Balkew, M.; Tekie, H. Anopheles larval species composition and characterization of breeding habitats in two localities in the Ghibe River Basin, southwestern Ethiopia. Malar. J. 2020, 19, 65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Khallaayoune, K.; Qualls, W.A.; Revay, E.E.; Allan, S.A.; Arheart, K.L.; Kravchenko, V.D.; Xue, R.D.; Schlein, Y.; Beier, J.C.; Muller, G.C. Attractive toxic sugar baits: Control of mosquitoes with the low-risk active ingredient dinotefuran and potential impacts on nontarget organisms in Morocco. Environ. Entomol. 2013, 42, 1040–1045. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Qualls, W.A.; Muller, G.C.; Revay, E.E.; Allan, S.A.; Arheart, K.L.; Beier, J.C.; Smith, M.L.; Scott, J.M.; Kravchenko, V.D.; Hausmann, A.; et al. Evaluation of attractive toxic sugar bait (ATSB)-barrier for control of vector and nuisance mosquitoes and its effect on non-target organisms in sub-tropical environments in Florida. Acta Trop. 2014, 131, 104–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Fulcher, A.; Scott, J.M.; Qualls, W.A.; Muller, G.C.; Xue, R.D. Attractive toxic sugar baits mixed with pyriproxyfen sprayed on plants against adult and larval Aedes albopictus (Diptera: Culicidae). J. Med. Entomol. 2014, 51, 896–899. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Revay, E.E.; Muller, G.C.; Qualls, W.A.; Kline, D.L.; Naranjo, D.P.; Arheart, K.L.; Kravchenko, V.D.; Yefremova, Z.; Hausmann, A.; Beier, J.C.; et al. Control of Aedes albopictus with attractive toxic sugar baits (ATSB) and potential impact on non-target organisms in St. Augustine, Florida. Parasitol. Res. 2014, 113, 73–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Junnila, A.; Revay, E.E.; Muller, G.C.; Kravchenko, V.; Qualls, W.A.; Xue, R.D.; Allen, S.A.; Beier, J.C.; Schlein, Y. Efficacy of attractive toxic sugar baits (ATSB) against Aedes albopictus with garlic oil encapsulated in beta-cyclodextrin as the active ingredient. Acta Trop. 2015, 152, 195–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Seeger, K.E.; Scott, J.M.; Muller, G.C.; Qualls, W.A.; Xue, R.D. Effect of common species of Florida landscaping plants on the efficacy of attractive toxic sugar baits against Aedes albopictus. J. Am. Mosq. Control. Assoc. 2017, 33, 139–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Sippy, R.; Rivera, G.E.; Sanchez, V.; Heras, F.; Morejon, B.; Beltran, E.; Hikida, R.S.; Lopez-Latorre, M.A.; Aguirre, A.; Stewart-Ibarra, A.M.; et al. Ingested insecticide to control Aedes aegypti: Developing a novel dried attractive toxic sugar bait device for intra-domiciliary control. Parasit. Vectors 2020, 13, 78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Muller, G.C.; Junnila, A.; Schlein, Y. Effective control of adult Culex pipiens by spraying an attractive toxic sugar bait solution in the vegetation near larval habitats. J. Med. Entomol. 2010, 47, 63–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Muller, G.C.; Junnila, A.; Qualls, W.; Revay, E.E.; Kline, D.L.; Allan, S.; Schlein, Y.; Xue, R.D. Control of Culex quinquefasciatus in a storm drain system in Florida using attractive toxic sugar baits. Med. Vet. Entomol. 2010, 24, 346–351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Qualls, W.A.; Scott-Fiorenzano, J.; Muller, G.C.; Arheart, K.L.; Beier, J.C.; Xue, R.D. Evaluation and adaptation of attractive toxic sugar baits for Culex tarsalis and Culex quinquefasciatus control in the Coachella Valley, Southern California. J. Am. Mosq. Control. Assoc. 2016, 32, 292–299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Beier, J.C.; Muller, G.C.; Gu, W.; Arheart, K.L.; Schlein, Y. Attractive toxic sugar bait (ATSB) methods decimate populations of Anopheles malaria vectors in arid environments regardless of the local availability of favoured sugar-source blossoms. Malar. J. 2012, 11, 31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Qualls, W.A.; Muller, G.C.; Traore, S.F.; Traore, M.M.; Arheart, K.L.; Doumbia, S.; Schlein, Y.; Kravchenko, V.D.; Xue, R.D.; Beier, J.C. Indoor use of attractive toxic sugar bait (ATSB) to effectively control malaria vectors in Mali, West Africa. Malar. J. 2015, 14, 301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Tenywa, F.C.; Kambagha, A.; Saddler, A.; Maia, M.F. The development of an ivermectin-based attractive toxic sugar bait (ATSB) to target Anopheles arabiensis. Malar. J. 2017, 16, 338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Furnival-Adams, J.E.C.; Camara, S.; Rowland, M.; Koffi, A.A.; Ahoua Alou, L.P.; Oumbouke, W.A.; N’Guessan, R. Indoor use of attractive toxic sugar bait in combination with long-lasting insecticidal net against pyrethroid-resistant Anopheles gambiae: An experimental hut trial in Mbe, central Cote d’Ivoire. Malar. J. 2020, 19, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Traore, M.M.; Junnila, A.; Traore, S.F.; Doumbia, S.; Revay, E.E.; Kravchenko, V.D.; Schlein, Y.; Arheart, K.L.; Gergely, P.; Xue, R.D.; et al. Large-scale field trial of attractive toxic sugar baits (ATSB) for the control of malaria vector mosquitoes in Mali, West Africa. Malar. J. 2020, 19, 72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Diarra, R.A.; Traore, M.M.; Junnila, A.; Traore, S.F.; Doumbia, S.; Revay, E.E.; Kravchenko, V.D.; Schlein, Y.; Arheart, K.L.; Gergely, P.; et al. Testing configurations of attractive toxic sugar bait (ATSB) stations in Mali, West Africa, for improving the control of malaria parasite transmission by vector mosquitoes and minimizing their effect on non-target insects. Malar. J. 2021, 20, 184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. MonSanto. Docket ID: EPA-HQ-OPP-2013-0485. Available online: https://www.apsnet.org/members/outreach/ppb/Documents/Monsanto%20posted%20written%20comment%20Jan%202014.pdf (accessed on 5 May 2014).
  60. Casanova, C.; Andrighetti, M.T.; Sampaio, S.M.; Marcoris, M.L.; Colla-Jacques, F.E.; Prado, A.P. Larval breeding sites of Lutzomyia longipalpis (Diptera: Psychodidae) in visceral leishmaniasis endemic urban areas in Southeastern Brazil. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2013, 7, e2443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Vivero, R.J.; Torres-Gutierrez, C.; Bejarano, E.E.; Pena, H.C.; Estrada, L.G.; Florez, F.; Ortega, E.; Aparicio, Y.; Muskus, C.E. Study on natural breeding sites of sand flies (Diptera: Phlebotominae) in areas of Leishmania transmission in Colombia. Parasit. Vectors 2015, 8, 116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Ferreira, T.N.; Pita-Pereira, D.; Costa, S.G.; Brazil, R.P.; Moraes, C.S.; Diaz-Albiter, H.M.; Genta, F.A. Transmission blocking sugar baits for the control of Leishmania development inside sand flies using environmentally friendly beta-glycosides and their aglycones. Parasit. Vectors 2018, 11, 614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. McDermott, E.G.; Morris, E.K.; Garver, L.S. Sodium ascorbate as a potential toxicant in attractive sugar baits for control of adult mosquitoes (Diptera: Culicidae) and sand flies (Diptera: Psychodidae). J. Med. Entomol. 2019, 56, 1359–1367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Clemons, A.; Mori, A.; Haugen, M.; Severson, D.W.; Duman-Scheel, M. Culturing and egg collection of Aedes aegypti. Cold Spring Harb. Protoc. 2010, 2010, pdb-prot5507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Singh, A.D.; Wong, S.; Ryan, C.P.; Whyard, S. Oral delivery of double-stranded RNA in larvae of the yellow fever mosquito, Aedes aegypti: Implications for pest mosquito control. J. Insect Sci. 2013, 13, 69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. World Health Organization. Guidelines for Laboratory and Field Testing of Mosquito Larvicides; World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2005. [Google Scholar]
  67. Tomchaney, M.; Mysore, K.; Sun, L.; Li, P.; Emrich, S.J.; Severson, D.W.; Duman-Scheel, M. Examination of the genetic basis for sexual dimorphism in the Aedes aegypti (dengue vector mosquito) pupal brain. Biol. Sex. Differ. 2014, 5, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. van Dijken, J.P.; Bauer, J.; Brambilla, L.; Duboc, P.; Francois, J.M.; Gancedo, C.; Giuseppin, M.L.; Heijnen, J.J.; Hoare, M.; Lange, H.C.; et al. An interlaboratory comparison of physiological and genetic properties of four Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains. Enzyme Microb. Technol. 2000, 26, 706–714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Mysore, K.; Hapairai, L.K.; Wei, N.; Realey, J.S.; Scheel, N.D.; Severson, D.W.; Duman-Scheel, M. Preparation and use of a yeast shRNA delivery system for gene silencing in mosquito larvae. Methods Mol. Biol. 2019, 1858, 213–231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Patel, N.H. In situ hybridization to whole mount Drosophila embryos. In A Laboratory Guide to RNA: Isolation, Analysis, and Synthesis; Krieg, P.A., Ed.; Wiley-Liss: New York, NY, USA, 1996; pp. 357–370. [Google Scholar]
  71. Haugen, M.; Tomchaney, M.; Kast, K.; Flannery, E.; Clemons, A.; Jacowski, C.; Simanton Holland, W.; Le, C.; Severson, D.; Duman-Scheel, M. Whole-mount in situ hybridization for analysis of gene expression during Aedes aegypti development. Cold Spring Harb. Protoc. 2010, 2010, pdb-prot5509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Schindelin, J.; Arganda-Carreras, I.; Frise, E.; Kaynig, V.; Longair, M.; Pietzsch, T.; Preibisch, S.; Rueden, C.; Saalfeld, S.; Schmid, B.; et al. Fiji: An open-source platform for biological-image analysis. Nat. Methods 2019, 9, 676–682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Mysore, K.; Sun, L.; Tomchaney, M.; Sullivan, G.; Adams, H.; Piscoya, A.S.; Severson, D.W.; Syed, Z.; Duman-Scheel, M. siRNA-Mediated silencing of doublesex during female development of the dengue vector mosquito Aedes aegypti. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2015, 9, e0004213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Hunter, W.; Ellis, J.; Vanengelsdorp, D.; Hayes, J.; Westervelt, D.; Glick, E.; Williams, M.; Sela, I.; Maori, E.; Pettis, J.; et al. Large-scale field application of RNAi technology reducing Israeli acute paralysis virus disease in honey bees (Apis mellifera, Hymenoptera: Apidae). PloS Pathog. 2010, 6, e1001160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Pathogens 10 01251 g001
Figure 1. Rbfox1.457 yeast consumption results in Rbfox1 silencing and A. aegypti larval death. (a) A ~100 bp PCR amplicon generated using primers corresponding to the Rbfox1.457 shRNA transcript is visualized in the lane marked by + in an ethidium bromide-stained agarose gel. cDNA template for the reaction was prepared from Rbfox1.457 yeast total RNA, and a negative control PCR reaction with no cDNA added (marked by a minus symbol) is included at far right. A representative gel from two comparable biological replicate experiments is shown; irrelevant lanes between a DNA standard at far left and the + lane were cropped from an image of the original gel, which is included as supplementary material. (b) Rbfox1 transcripts detected in the A. aegypti L4 brain were significantly reduced in larvae fed with dried inactivated yeast interfering RNA larvicide Rbfox1.457 tablets. Compiled mean gray value results provide evidence of RNAi-mediated silencing; n numbers are indicated below each bar in the graphs. (c) A. aegypti larval consumption of inactivated dried Rbfox1.457 yeast resulted in significant larval death in laboratory trials. (d) Rbfox1.457 induced significant larval lethality in outdoor semi-field trials conducted in 7.5 L containers bearing 3.5 L water. In (c,d), data compiled from multiple replicate trials (each with 20 larvae) are represented as mean percentages of larval mortality; error bars denote SEM, and n numbers are indicated below each bar in the graphs. (e) A survival-curve for A. aegypti larvae reared on the indicated diets is shown, indicating that a majority of Rbfox1.457 yeast-treated larvae died by the fourth instar of larval development. (f) A dose response curve illustrates that larval mortality is correlated to the amount of Rbfox1.457 yeast consumed. Each data point corresponds to the percent mortality observed in a single-container assay conducted with 20 larvae. *** = p < 0.001 (Student’s t-test).
Figure 1. Rbfox1.457 yeast consumption results in Rbfox1 silencing and A. aegypti larval death. (a) A ~100 bp PCR amplicon generated using primers corresponding to the Rbfox1.457 shRNA transcript is visualized in the lane marked by + in an ethidium bromide-stained agarose gel. cDNA template for the reaction was prepared from Rbfox1.457 yeast total RNA, and a negative control PCR reaction with no cDNA added (marked by a minus symbol) is included at far right. A representative gel from two comparable biological replicate experiments is shown; irrelevant lanes between a DNA standard at far left and the + lane were cropped from an image of the original gel, which is included as supplementary material. (b) Rbfox1 transcripts detected in the A. aegypti L4 brain were significantly reduced in larvae fed with dried inactivated yeast interfering RNA larvicide Rbfox1.457 tablets. Compiled mean gray value results provide evidence of RNAi-mediated silencing; n numbers are indicated below each bar in the graphs. (c) A. aegypti larval consumption of inactivated dried Rbfox1.457 yeast resulted in significant larval death in laboratory trials. (d) Rbfox1.457 induced significant larval lethality in outdoor semi-field trials conducted in 7.5 L containers bearing 3.5 L water. In (c,d), data compiled from multiple replicate trials (each with 20 larvae) are represented as mean percentages of larval mortality; error bars denote SEM, and n numbers are indicated below each bar in the graphs. (e) A survival-curve for A. aegypti larvae reared on the indicated diets is shown, indicating that a majority of Rbfox1.457 yeast-treated larvae died by the fourth instar of larval development. (f) A dose response curve illustrates that larval mortality is correlated to the amount of Rbfox1.457 yeast consumed. Each data point corresponds to the percent mortality observed in a single-container assay conducted with 20 larvae. *** = p < 0.001 (Student’s t-test).
Pathogens 10 01251 g001
Pathogens 10 01251 g002
Figure 2. RNAi-based ATSBs targeting Rbfox1 result in high levels of A. aegypti mortality. (a) Heat-inactivated Rbfox1.457 yeast can be delivered in 5% sucrose as an ATSB (red-dyed solution at feeding station in (a) that is readily consumed by A. aegypti adult females. (b) An engorged female that has consumed red ATSB is shown. (c) Significant mortality is observed in A. aegypti that consumed Rbfox1.457 yeast ATSB in comparison to adults that consumed sugar bait with control yeast. *** = p < 0.001; error bars represent SEM; n numbers are indicated below each bar in the graph. (d) A dose-response curve showing the concentration of Rbfox1.457 yeast in the sugar bait vs. the percentage mortality of A. aegypti adult females is shown; each point represents an ATSB trial with 25 adult females. (e) The survival curve for adult females that fed on control yeast sugar bait or Rbfox1.457 yeast sugar bait is shown.
Figure 2. RNAi-based ATSBs targeting Rbfox1 result in high levels of A. aegypti mortality. (a) Heat-inactivated Rbfox1.457 yeast can be delivered in 5% sucrose as an ATSB (red-dyed solution at feeding station in (a) that is readily consumed by A. aegypti adult females. (b) An engorged female that has consumed red ATSB is shown. (c) Significant mortality is observed in A. aegypti that consumed Rbfox1.457 yeast ATSB in comparison to adults that consumed sugar bait with control yeast. *** = p < 0.001; error bars represent SEM; n numbers are indicated below each bar in the graph. (d) A dose-response curve showing the concentration of Rbfox1.457 yeast in the sugar bait vs. the percentage mortality of A. aegypti adult females is shown; each point represents an ATSB trial with 25 adult females. (e) The survival curve for adult females that fed on control yeast sugar bait or Rbfox1.457 yeast sugar bait is shown.
Pathogens 10 01251 g002
Pathogens 10 01251 g003
Figure 3. Rbfox1.457 yeast ATSB results in target gene silencing and significantly impacts Notch signaling in A. aegypti. Rbfox1.457 ATSB consumption resulted in a significant reduction in Rbfox1 (a), Notch (b), and spdo (c) transcripts in the A. aegypti adult female brain; n numbers of brains analyzed are indicated below each bar in the graphs. *** = p < 0.001 vs. sugar bait alone or sugar bait with control yeast; data were analyzed with Student’s t-test.
Figure 3. Rbfox1.457 yeast ATSB results in target gene silencing and significantly impacts Notch signaling in A. aegypti. Rbfox1.457 ATSB consumption resulted in a significant reduction in Rbfox1 (a), Notch (b), and spdo (c) transcripts in the A. aegypti adult female brain; n numbers of brains analyzed are indicated below each bar in the graphs. *** = p < 0.001 vs. sugar bait alone or sugar bait with control yeast; data were analyzed with Student’s t-test.
Pathogens 10 01251 g003
Pathogens 10 01251 g004
Figure 4. Rbfox1.457 yeast is a broad-based mosquito adulticide and larvicide. Oral consumption of Rbfox1.457 yeast ATSB results in high levels of adult (a–c) and larval (d–f) mortality in A. gambiae (a,d), C. quinquefasciatus (b,e), and A. albopictus (c,f). The data represent mean mortalities with error bars representing SEM; n numbers are indicated below each bar in the graphs. Data were statistically analyzed with ANOVA in (a–c) and Student’s t-test in (d–f). *** p < 0.001 in comparison to control-treated individuals.
Figure 4. Rbfox1.457 yeast is a broad-based mosquito adulticide and larvicide. Oral consumption of Rbfox1.457 yeast ATSB results in high levels of adult (a–c) and larval (d–f) mortality in A. gambiae (a,d), C. quinquefasciatus (b,e), and A. albopictus (c,f). The data represent mean mortalities with error bars representing SEM; n numbers are indicated below each bar in the graphs. Data were statistically analyzed with ANOVA in (a–c) and Student’s t-test in (d–f). *** p < 0.001 in comparison to control-treated individuals.
Pathogens 10 01251 g004
Table 1. Aedes aegypti mortality induced by Rbfox1.457 siRNA.
Table 1. Aedes aegypti mortality induced by Rbfox1.457 siRNA.
Experiment 1% Mortalityp Value
Control vs.
Treatment 		n
Larval soaking
Control siRNA0 ± 04.4−1340
Rbfox1 siRNA73 ± 2.5
Adult microinjection
Control siRNA5 4.0−320
Rbfox1 siRNA45
ATSB/siRNA feeding
Control siRNA8 ± 5.33.5−1037
Rbfox1 siRNA77 ± 7.142
1 Mortality rates (with standard deviations (SDs) for the soaking and standard errors of the mean (SEMs) for feedings), the total numbers of individuals subjected to each treatment (n), and the p value obtained in Fisher’s exact test analyses between Rbfox1.457 siRNA-treated and corresponding control siRNA-treated individuals are indicated.
Table 2. ATSB feeding rates in mosquitoes.
Table 2. ATSB feeding rates in mosquitoes.
Feeding Rate (%)
Experiment 1SpeciesControlRbfox1.457n
siRNA ATSBA. aegypti57 ± 763 ± 8.565
Yeast ATSBA. aegypti100 ± 0100 ± 0150
A. gambiae100 ± 0100 ± 075
C. quinquefasciatus100 ± 0100 ± 0225
A. albopictus89 ± 0.591 ± 1225
1 The percentages of insects that became engorged with sugar meals consisting of each of the indicated treatments are shown. The mosquito species, feeding rates with SEMs, and the total number of individuals subjected to each treatment (n) are indicated. No significant differences between control or insecticidal treatments were observed.
Table 3. Survival of select non-target organisms treated with Rbfox1.457.
Table 3. Survival of select non-target organisms treated with Rbfox1.457.
Test Organism 1ControlRbfox1.457 n
D. magna adults100 ± 098 ± 3.540
D. melanogaster larvae100 ± 0100 ± 060
D. melanogaster adults100 ± 099 ± 160
H. convergens adults90 ± 090 ± 720
O. fasciatus adults80 ± 777.5 ± 1840
T. castaneum adults100 ± 0100 ± 060
1 The percentages of insects that became engorged with sugar meals consisting of each of the indicated treatments (Control or Rbfox1.457). The mosquito species, feeding rates with SDs, and the total number of individuals subjected to each treatment (n) are indicated. No significant differences between control or insecticidal treatments were observed.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Mysore, K.; Sun, L.; Hapairai, L.K.; Wang, C.-W.; Roethele, J.B.; Igiede, J.; Scheel, M.P.; Scheel, N.D.; Li, P.; Wei, N.; et al. A Broad-Based Mosquito Yeast Interfering RNA Pesticide Targeting Rbfox1 Represses Notch Signaling and Kills Both Larvae and Adult Mosquitoes. Pathogens 2021, 10, 1251. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens10101251

AMA Style

Mysore K, Sun L, Hapairai LK, Wang C-W, Roethele JB, Igiede J, Scheel MP, Scheel ND, Li P, Wei N, et al. A Broad-Based Mosquito Yeast Interfering RNA Pesticide Targeting Rbfox1 Represses Notch Signaling and Kills Both Larvae and Adult Mosquitoes. Pathogens. 2021; 10(10):1251. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens10101251

Chicago/Turabian Style

Mysore, Keshava, Longhua Sun, Limb K. Hapairai, Chien-Wei Wang, Joseph B. Roethele, Jessica Igiede, Max P. Scheel, Nicholas D. Scheel, Ping Li, Na Wei, and et al. 2021. "A Broad-Based Mosquito Yeast Interfering RNA Pesticide Targeting Rbfox1 Represses Notch Signaling and Kills Both Larvae and Adult Mosquitoes" Pathogens 10, no. 10: 1251. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens10101251

APA Style

Mysore, K., Sun, L., Hapairai, L. K., Wang, C.-W., Roethele, J. B., Igiede, J., Scheel, M. P., Scheel, N. D., Li, P., Wei, N., Severson, D. W., & Duman-Scheel, M. (2021). A Broad-Based Mosquito Yeast Interfering RNA Pesticide Targeting Rbfox1 Represses Notch Signaling and Kills Both Larvae and Adult Mosquitoes. Pathogens, 10(10), 1251. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens10101251

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop