2.1. Raw Materials and Mix Proportion Design
Ordinary Portland cement (P.O 42.5), produced in Liaoning Province, China, was used as the primary binder. Its physical and mechanical properties complied with the requirements of GB 175–2023 [
27]. Class I fly ash, conforming to GB/T 1596–2017 [
28], was incorporated as a supplementary cementitious material. Continuously graded river gravel with a particle size range of 5–25 mm and a crushing index of 8.6% was used as the coarse aggregate.
The fine aggregates consisted of natural medium sand and desert sand. The natural medium sand was a well-graded river sand with a fineness modulus of 2.46. The desert sand was collected from the surface of Jinshatan in Kangping County, Shenyang (a southern part of the Horqin Sandy Land). As summarized in
Table 1, the physical properties of the fine aggregates show significant differences; specifically, the desert sand is characterized by an ultra-fine particle size, with a fineness modulus of 0.198 and an apparent density of 2680 kg/m
3. Chemical analysis of the sand from this region indicates a high silica (SiO
2) As summarized in
Table 1, the physical properties of the fine aggregates show significant differences; specifically, the desert sand is characterized by an ultra-fine particle size, with a fineness modulus of 0.198 and an apparent density of 2680 kg/m
3. Chemical analysis of the sand from this region indicates a high silica (SiO
2) content of 84.71%, providing a stable mineralogical basis for its application in cementitious composites [
29]. The direct comparison highlights that the fineness modulus of desert sand is much lower than that of river sand (2.46), which allows it to effectively fill the micro-voids within the concrete matrix, thereby optimizing the internal pore structure and potentially enhancing the freeze–thaw resistance of the hybrid fiber-reinforced concrete.
Two types of fibers were employed as reinforcement. The steel fibers (SFs) were multi-anchored fibers with a length of 35 mm, an equivalent diameter of 0.75 mm, an aspect ratio of approximately 46.7, and a tensile strength of no less than 1150 MPa. The polypropylene fibers (PPFs) were bundled monofilament fibers with a length of 12 mm, an equivalent diameter of 0.03 mm, an aspect ratio of 400, and a tensile strength of 276 MPa.
A naphthalene-based high-range water-reducing admixture, providing a water-reduction efficiency of 15–20%, was used to ensure adequate workability. The target concrete strength grade was C45. According to the Chinese Industry Standard JGJ 55-2011 [
30] (Specification for Mix Proportion Design of Ordinary Concrete), the mix design strength was calculated according to Equation (
1):
where
is the mix design strength (MPa);
is the characteristic compressive strength (MPa); and
is the standard deviation of compressive strength (6.0 MPa). Based on the calculation, the required mix design strength was determined to be 53.2 MPa.
The water–binder ratio (
) was calculated in accordance with the same technical specification using Equation (
2):
where
is the measured cement strength (MPa);
is the required concrete strength (MPa); and
and
are regression coefficients stipulated in the JGJ 55-2011 [
30] standard dependent on the coarse aggregate type. The specific coefficients are summarized in
Table 2.
Using pebble aggregate, the calculated W/B was 0.44. After trial mixing and adjustment to improve workability, the final W/B was fixed at 0.38.
2.2. Design and Parameters of Orthogonal Experiments
To promote resource utilization and environmental sustainability, desert sand was used to partially replace natural medium sand, while steel and polypropylene fibers were incorporated to enhance crack resistance and durability. Considering that regions rich in desert sand are often subjected to cold climatic conditions, evaluating the freeze–thaw durability of steel–polypropylene hybrid fiber-reinforced desert sand concrete is of clear engineering significance.
The overall experimental workflow is illustrated in
Figure 1.
Three primary factors were selected for the orthogonal experiment: desert sand replacement ratio (DSR), steel fiber (SF) volume content, and polypropylene fiber (PPF) volume content. The levels of the orthogonal factors were determined based on a comprehensive analysis of the existing literature and the specific requirements for concrete performance. It is widely recognized in the field of desert sand concrete research that a replacement ratio of approximately 30% often serves as a critical threshold. Within this range, the micro-filling effect of desert sand can enhance the density of the cement matrix, whereas exceeding this ratio typically leads to a significant increase in water demand and a subsequent decline in mechanical strength. Therefore, the DSR levels in this study were set at 10%, 20%, and 30% to optimize the material properties within this most effective performance window. Each factor was assigned three levels, as listed in
Table 3, and the corresponding orthogonal test matrix is presented in
Table 4. The specific dosages of materials for each group are detailed in
Table 5.
2.3. Specimen Preparation and Test Methods
Concrete mixtures were prepared in accordance with GB/T 50080–2016 [
31] using an HJW-60 forced single-shaft mixer (Cangzhou Luyi Highway Engineering Instrument Co., Ltd., Cangzhou, China). Cement, medium sand, desert sand, and coarse aggregates were dry-mixed for 30 s. Approximately 80% of the mixing water was then added and mixed for another 30 s. Pre-dispersed SF and PPF were subsequently introduced and mixed for 60 s. Finally, the remaining 20% of the mixing water containing the dissolved superplasticizer was added, followed by an additional 120 s of mixing.
To ensure the statistical validity of the experimental findings, a total of 297 specimens were prepared based on the orthogonal test matrix (
Table 4). For each of the nine mixture proportions, 30 cube specimens (
mm
3) were fabricated for mechanical property evaluations, and 3 prism specimens (
mm
3) were produced for freeze–thaw testing. Fresh mixtures were cast into molds and compacted using a frequency-modulated vibration table. After demolding at 48 h, all specimens were cured in a saturated Ca(OH)
2 solution at 20 ± 2 °C for 28 days. The freeze–thaw resistance was evaluated using the rapid freeze–thaw method in accordance with GB/T 50082-2009 [
32]. Prior to testing, specimens were immersed in water at 20 ± 2 °C for 4 days to reach a saturated state. Each freeze–thaw cycle was completed within 2–4 h, with the specimen core temperature controlled between −
°C and 8 ± 2 °C at the end of freezing and thawing, respectively. The samples were subjected to 0, 25, 50, 75, and 100 freeze–thaw cycles. At each interval, specimen mass and fundamental transverse frequency were recorded to calculate the mass loss and relative dynamic modulus of elasticity. Testing was terminated once the relative dynamic modulus decreased below 60% or the mass loss exceeded 5%.
- (1)
Compressive strength
Compressive strength was measured according to GB/T 50081–2019 [
33]. The compressive strength
was calculated using Equation (
3):
where
F is the ultimate load at failure (N) and
A is the loaded area (mm
2).
- (2)
Splitting tensile strength
Splitting tensile strength was determined following GB/T 50081-2002 [
34], and the splitting tensile strength
was calculated using Equation (
4):
where
F is the ultimate load at failure (N), and
A is the loaded area (mm
2).
- (3)
Mass loss rate
The mass loss rate after
n freeze–thaw cycles was calculated according to Equation (
5):
where
is the initial mass of the specimen, and
is the mass after
n freeze–thaw cycles.
- (4)
Dynamic elastic modulus
The dynamic modulus of elasticity was measured using a dynamic modulus tester (DT-16, Tianjin Meisi Technology Co., Ltd., Tianjin, China) and calculated using Equation (
6):
where
is the dynamic elastic modulus (MPa);
a is the side length of the square cross-section (mm);
L is the specimen length (mm);
W is the mass (kg, accurate to 0.01 kg); and
f is the fundamental transverse frequency (Hz).
- (5)
Freeze-thaw damage index
The freeze–thaw damage degree
D was defined based on the variation in the dynamic elastic modulus of elasticity, as expressed in Equation (
7):
where
and
are the dynamic modulus of elasticity after
N freeze–thaw cycles and before freezing, respectively.
The primary testing instruments used in this study are shown in
Figure 2.