Next Article in Journal
Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Construction Management (CM): A Systematic Review of Models and Methods
Previous Article in Journal
Semi-Supervised Domain Adaptation Networks for Self-Adaptive Identification of Grouting Sleeve Internal Defect
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Influence of Iron Tailing Powder-Granulated Blast Furnace Slag Composite Admixtures on the Mechanical Properties and Resistance to Chloride Erosion of Cement Mortar

1
Inspection and Certification Co., Ltd., MCC, Beijing 100082, China
2
School of Civil Engineering, North China University of Technology, Beijing 100144, China
3
Key Laboratory of Disaster Prevention and Control Technology and Equipment for Tailings Ponds, State Administration of Mining Safety, Beijing 100038, China
4
School of Urban Construction, Changzhou University, Changzhou 213164, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Buildings 2026, 16(11), 2224; https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings16112224
Submission received: 27 April 2026 / Revised: 24 May 2026 / Accepted: 26 May 2026 / Published: 1 June 2026
(This article belongs to the Section Building Materials, and Repair & Renovation)

Abstract

The use of iron tailing powder (ITP) and granulated blast-furnace slag (GBFS) offers a feasible route for preparing low-cement mortar while recycling industrial by-products. In this study, seven cement mortar mixtures were designed to investigate the influence of the ITP–GBFS ratio on mechanical properties, microstructure, hydration products, and chloride ion penetration resistance. The mixtures included plain cement mortar (A0), mortar with 50% ITP (A1), mortar with 50% GBFS (A2), and four composite mixtures (A3–A6) in which ITP and GBFS jointly replaced 50% of cement at different ratios. The results showed that the mixture containing 20% ITP and 30% GBFS (A4) exhibited the best overall performance among the composite mixtures. At 28 d, A4 reached a compressive strength of 51.3 MPa and a flexural strength of 11.0 MPa, exceeding those of the plain cement control. SEM and XRD analyses suggested that the optimized ITP–GBFS combination promoted the formation of poorly crystalline hydration products, such as C–S–H/C–A–S–H gels, and refined the pore structure, resulting in a denser hardened matrix. The rapid chloride migration test showed that the chloride migration coefficient of A4 was 15.47 × 10−12 m2/s, only slightly higher than that of A0, indicating that the optimized composite binder maintained chloride penetration resistance close to that of plain cement mortar while replacing 50% of cement. The results indicate that a properly proportioned ITP–GBFS binder can maintain acceptable strength and chloride resistance while reducing cement consumption.

1. Introduction

The growing use of cement-based materials has increased interest in binders with lower clinker content. Cement manufacture is associated with considerable carbon emissions, making clinker reduction an important strategy for developing more sustainable cementitious materials [1,2]. In response, supplementary cementitious materials (SCMs) such as fly ash, silica fume, and granulated blast furnace slag (GBFS) have been widely used to partially replace cement, thereby reducing environmental impact while improving material performance [3], granulated blast furnace slag [4,5], and silica fume [6] have been utilized as partial substitutes for cement in concrete, leading to a reduction in carbon emissions associated with cement production.
Mine tailings are solid residues produced during mineral processing and are generated in large quantities worldwide [7]. The mining sector, intrinsically linked to the steel industry, is both resource- and energy-intensive. As illustrated in Figure 1, China’s crude steel production has consistently exceeded one billion tons annually since 2020, reflecting a sustained high level of industrial output. On average, the extraction of one ton of target metal yields approximately 200 tons of tailings. Consequently, the global generation of tailings is estimated to range between 5 and 10 billion tons per year [8,9,10]. Advances in mineral processing technologies have further enabled the economic exploitation of low-grade ores, exacerbating the volume of tailings produced. This trend underscores the ongoing escalation in tailings accumulation. Conventional tailings storage may cause long-term environmental and stability problems if the materials are not effectively managed. In the absence of effective management, these tailings can lead to severe contamination of soil, surface and groundwater, air pollution through dust generation, and direct threats to human health and ecosystems [9,11,12].
Although iron tailings contain useful mineral phases, their large-scale reuse remains limited [13]. Vast volumes are therefore retained in surface impoundments that grow year after year. These tailings are rarely inert: they routinely contain elevated concentrations of Cr, Cu, Pb and Cd that were originally bound in the ore. Where geomembrane or clay-barrier systems are absent, or where leachate-collection networks and groundwater monitoring wells have never been installed, acidic or alkaline pore-water can percolate through the dam body, mobilising trace metals and releasing them into surrounding soils and aquifers [14,15,16,17]. The bulk chemistry of iron tailings is dominated by SiO2, Al2O3 and Fe2O3, but the exact proportions vary markedly between mining districts. Mineralogically, the fines are composed chiefly of framework and sheet alumino-silicates—quartz, alkali feldspar, mica, amphibole and chlorite—together with accessory dolomite and trace sulphides that can act as long-term sources of metals and acid rock drainage [18,19,20].
According to the findings of Adiguzel [9] and Simonsen [21] et al., when the combined total of Al2O3, Fe2O3, and SiO2 exceeds 70%, the tailings are classified as potential volcanic ash. if the total of CaO and SiO2 surpasses 50%, the tailings are designated as potential hydraulic hardness. that these materials may be suitable for use as supplementary cementitious materials (SCMs). ITP has attracted attention as a supplementary material because it can contribute to particle packing, reduce solid-waste accumulation, and lower cement consumption: (1) ITP possesses potential cementitious properties. Incorporating ITP into concrete can enhance its internal microstructure, thereby improving the mechanical properties and durability of the resulting specimens. (2) The current disposal of iron tailings presents significant challenges, posing risks of severe environmental pollution and economic losses. The opening of existing tailings ponds for disposal may introduce additional environmental hazards, and climate change could exacerbate the risk of tailings leakage [22]. (3) Traditional cement production involves calcination, which consumes substantial energy and generates significant carbon emissions. Utilizing ITP as a substitute for cement can lower costs and reduce the overall carbon footprint of the cement industry, thereby promoting sustainable development.
Previous studies have shown that ITP affects mortar and concrete mainly through filler effects, limited pozzolanic activity, and changes in pore structure. Cheng et al. [23] employed nano-indentation mapping across the interfacial transition zone (ITZ) and found that 15–20 wt.% ITP refined the ITZ porosity; micro-hardness and elastic modulus were locally lowered, but both parameters recovered progressively with distance from the aggregate surface, evidencing a densification front driven by secondary pozzolanic products. Han et al. [24] monitored 28-day-old concretes containing up to 30 wt.% ITP. Early-age compressive strength remained statistically unchanged, whereas carbonation depth decreased by 25% and freeze–thaw mass-loss dropped by 30%; chloride-ion migration coefficients, however, were unaffected, implying that ITP alone does not generate a sufficiently tortuous pore network to hinder ionic transport. Tian et al. [25] incorporated ultra-fine ITP (d50 ≈ 3 µm) into ultra-high-performance concrete (UHPC). Rheometry showed that ITP acted as an inert micro-filler that reduced yield stress, while isothermal calorimetry revealed a secondary hydration peak after 36 h when ITP was co-blended with slag and fly ash. SEM/BSE images confirmed that the additional C-(A)-H phases nucleated on ITP particles, bridging the gap between slag grains and accelerating strength development beyond 90 MPa at 28 d.
GBFS is a steelmaking by-product with latent hydraulic activity due to its calcium-aluminosilicate glass phase. Because of its reactive glassy phase, GBFS is widely used to partially replace cement and improve later-age properties. To a certain extent, it can reduce the amount of cement required, absorb waste produced by the steel industry, and lower CO2 emissions, thereby offering significant environmental protection benefits. Abbas et al. [26] incorporated GBFS as a substitute for cement in self-compacting concrete at replacement levels of 10%, 20%, and 30%. After curing for 7, 28, and 90 days, tests were conducted to evaluate workability, compressive strength, flexural strength, and splitting tensile strength. The results indicated that as the curing age increased and the level of cement substitution with GBFS rose, the workability, compressive strength, splitting tensile strength, flexural strength, and other properties of the self-compacting concrete improved. Toshiki et al. [27] also investigated the impact of a high dosage of GBFS powder on the durability of concrete and found that GBFS could enhance the freeze–thaw resistance of concrete without the need for air-entraining agents. Additionally, it increased the concrete’s resistance to chloride ion penetration and sulfate erosion. Li et al. [28] examined the effect of GBFS micro-powder on the durability of a ternary cementitious system under combined chloride and sulfate erosion and reached similar conclusions. When GBFS micro-powder replaces a portion of the supplementary cementitious materials in the ternary cementitious system, it effectively reduces the content of free chloride ions and total chloride ions in the concrete.
The durability of cementitious materials under aggressive environments is a critical issue for infrastructure applications. Recent studies have shown that prolonged exposure to chemically aggressive or alkaline environments can affect the microstructure, interfacial bonding and mechanical performance of cement-based composite systems [29]. Therefore, evaluating the resistance of low-cement mortars to chloride ion penetration is necessary when considering the use of solid-waste-based supplementary cementitious materials.
Most previous studies focused on ITP or GBFS separately, while the combined effect of ITP and GBFS on strength and chloride resistance remains insufficiently clarified; consequently, this study formulates a systematic suite of ternary binders in which ITP and GBFS jointly substitute 50% of Portland cement across five progressively inverted ITP/GBFS ratios, then traces the consequences for mechanical development, microstructural refinement, hydration chemistry and chloride resistance by subjecting identically proportioned mortar and paste samples to compressive/flexural testing, SEM imaging, XRD/TG phase analysis and rapid chloride migration measurements, thereby elucidating how the mutual dilution–pozzolanic balance governs strength gain, portlandite consumption, secondary C-(A)-H formation and ionic transport so that an optimal ITP–GBFS blend capable of matching control performance while markedly reducing clinker demand can be identified for durable, large-scale valorisation of mining and metallurgical wastes in aggressive service environments.
Although ITP and GBFS have been separately investigated as supplementary cementitious materials, the performance of high-volume cement replacement systems containing both ITP and GBFS remains insufficiently understood. In particular, the balance between the weakly reactive, silica-rich ITP and the calcium-aluminosilicate-rich GBFS has not been clearly established in terms of strength development, microstructural evolution and chloride ion penetration resistance. This study evaluates different ITP/GBFS ratios under a fixed 50% cement replacement level to identify a suitable composite binder. This approach allows the role of the ITP/GBFS balance to be clarified and provides a basis for identifying an optimized composite binder with reduced cement consumption and acceptable mechanical and durability-related performance.

2. Materials and Test Methods

For mechanical testing, prism specimens with dimensions of 40 mm × 40 mm × 160 mm were prepared. Flexural testing was performed first, and the broken prism halves were then used for compressive strength measurement. For the RCM test, cylindrical mortar specimens with a diameter of 100 mm and a height of 50 mm were prepared using the same binder proportions. For microstructural analyses, paste specimens with the same binder composition and water-to-binder ratio were prepared to avoid interference from sand particles. All specimens were cured under identical curing conditions before testing.

2.1. Raw Materials

P·I42.5 Portland cement was used as the reference binder, with a specific surface area of 356 m2/kg and a density of 3.12 g/cm3. ITP was prepared by grinding beneficiation tailings; its specific surface area and density were 434 m2/kg and 3.64 g/cm3, respectively. The granulated blast furnace slag employed in the experiment was a by-product from the blast furnace ironmaking process of a specific company in Hebei Province, with a specific surface area of 412 m2/kg and a density of 2.90 g/cm3. The chemical compositions of PC, ITP, and GBFS are presented in Table 1. The sand used in this experiment is standard sand supplied by Xiamen ISO Standard Sand Co., Ltd. (Xiamen, China).
X-ray fluorescence spectroscopy and XRD analysis were conducted on ITP, as illustrated in Figure 2, alongside the primary chemical components of ITP presented in Table 1. XRF analysis showed that ITP was dominated by SiO2, which accounted for 65.48% of its chemical composition. Additionally, it contains a minor amount of Fe2O3, accounting for 9.22%. This indicates that the iron content in ITP is relatively low. The analysis of its mineral composition reveals that it is predominantly composed of gangue minerals, such as quartz. As shown in Figure 3, the regularity of the final surface of ITP is relatively low, and the surface appears smooth. This may be attributed to the substantial presence of SiO2 within the material.
As shown in Figure 4, the XRD pattern of GBFS showed a broad hump, suggesting the presence of an amorphous glassy phase with potential reactivity. As detailed in Table 1, the main chemical components of GBFS are CaO, SiO2, and Al2O3, with the CaO content reaching as high as 48.48%, classifying it as a high-calcium system.

2.2. Sample Preparation

The mix ratios of cement mortar containing GBFS and ITP are detailed in Table 2. Mortar and paste were prepared in accordance with the Chinese standard GB/T 50080-2016 [30]. Prior to the formal mixing procedure, the composite materials should be mixed for 30 s to ensure even distribution of the cementitious materials. The specimen preparation process is illustrated in Figure 5, and the test flowchart is presented in Figure 6.
After molding, the specimens were sealed with plastic film and kept at 20 ± 2 °C for the first 24 h. The hardened specimens were demolded and cured under standard conditions until testing at 3, 7, and 28 d. The paste samples used for XRD, SEM and TG analyses were cured under the same conditions.

2.3. Test Methods

2.3.1. Mechanical Properties Testing

Mechanical properties were tested using 40 mm × 40 mm × 160 mm prism specimens. Fresh mortar was poured into rectangular molds. After curing at room temperature for 24 h, the molds were removed, and the specimens were subsequently cured and stored in water until the target age. Mechanical performance tests were conducted on the 3 d, 7 d, and 28 d using the YW-300 machine, in accordance with the Chinese standard GB/T 17671-2021 [31]. The average value of the test results was recorded. For each mixture and curing age, three prism specimens were tested for flexural strength, and the six broken halves obtained after the flexural test were used for compressive strength testing. The reported strength values are the averages of the tested specimens, and the error bars represent the standard deviation.

2.3.2. XRD Test

XRD was used to identify the crystalline phases in the hardened paste samples. The spectra obtained from the experimental tests were collected using the German Bruker D8 Discover Vantec-500 X-ray diffraction instrument (Bruker AXS, Karlsruhe, Germany). The test conditions included diffraction using a cobalt target light source, with a working voltage of 42 kV and a working current of 100 mA. The scanning angle ranged from 0° to 135° (2θ), with a scanning step size of 0.02° per step and a scanning speed of 10° per minute. At the designated curing age, representative paste fragments were collected from the interior of the specimens. Hydration was stopped by immersing the fragments in isopropanol for 24 h, followed by drying at 40 °C to constant mass. The dried samples were ground and passed through a 75 μm sieve before XRD testing.

2.3.3. SEM Test

The microstructure of the hardened samples was observed using a Zeiss Gemini 300 field-emission scanning electron microscope (Carl Zeiss Microscopy GmbH, Jena, Germany). The test specimens were in dry block form. Before SEM observation, the dried samples were coated with gold using a sputter coater at 20 mA for 180 s. Small fragments were taken from the interior of the hardened mortar specimens after curing for 28 d. The fragments were immersed in isopropanol to stop hydration, dried at low temperature, and then coated with gold before SEM observation.

2.3.4. Test for Resistance to Chloride Ion Penetration

The principle of the chloride ion penetration resistance test is illustrated in Figure 7. This test utilized cylindrical specimens with a diameter of 100 mm and a height of 50 mm. Chloride migration resistance was evaluated by the RCM method at 28 d, as outlined in the “Standard Test Methods for Long-Term Performance and Durability of Ordinary Concrete” (GB/T 50082-2009) [32]. The RCM test was conducted after the specimens had been cured for 28 days. The mortar was placed in the RCM tester, and 300 mL of NaOH solution (0.3 mol/L) and 12 L of a 10% NaCl solution were injected into the positive and negative electrodes, respectively. The anode and cathode were connected to the chloride ion diffusion coefficient meter. The corresponding test channel was activated, and the applied voltage was recorded. After the test, the duration and average temperature were noted. After the test, the specimens were split and sprayed with 0.1 mol/L AgNO3 solution to determine the chloride penetration depth. The chloride penetration depth was measured after the white AgCl precipitation boundary became stable. For each specimen, the penetration depth was measured at five equally spaced points along the cross-section, excluding the edge zones within 10 mm from both sides. The average value was used as xd. The standard deviation of the measurements was used to represent the uncertainty of the penetration depth. For each mixture, three cylindrical specimens were tested in the RCM test. The chloride migration coefficient was reported as the average value, and the standard deviation was used to evaluate the measurement uncertainty. The migration and diffusion coefficients of the chloride ions were calculated using Equation (1):
D r c m = 0.0239 × ( T + 273 ) L ( U 2 ) t ( X d 0.0238 ( T + 273 ) L X d U 2 )
where Drcm is the chloride migration coefficient, T is the average temperature of the anolyte solution, L is the specimen thickness, U is the absolute value of the applied voltage, t is the test duration, and Xd is the chloride penetration depth.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Mechanical Properties

As shown in Figure 8, the compressive strength results show that the ITP–GBFS ratio strongly influenced strength development at all curing ages. At 28 d the ranking is A2 > A4 > A0 > A3 > A5 > A6 > A1, with the 50% GBFS mortar (A2) reaching 52.3 MPa—10.1% higher than A0—while the 50% ITP mortar (A1) falls to the minimum, 21% below the control. At 3 d, all blended mixtures showed lower strength than A0, mainly because cement dilution was dominant at early age. By 7 d the GBFS-containing mixes recover sharply as the glassy Ca-rich phase begins to hydrate, whereas A1 remains retarded; its SiO2-rich but Al-deficient composition limits pozzolanic C-(A)-H formation, so strength gain stays sluggish and the 28 d value is lowest.
Among the ternary blends A3–A6, the 28 d compressive strength showed a bell-shaped trend and reached the maximum value of 51.3 MPa for A4, corresponding to the mixture with 20% ITP and 30% GBFS. This result suggests that the 20% ITP and 30% GBFS ratio provided the most suitable balance for strength development. The improved performance of A4 was related to the filling effect of ITP and the hydration activity of GBFS. ITP mainly acts as a micro-filler at early ages, providing nucleation sites and improving particle packing. GBFS, which contains reactive CaO, SiO2 and Al2O3, can participate in latent hydraulic and pozzolanic reactions during hydration. As curing proceeds, the interaction between GBFS and the silica-rich ITP may promote the formation of additional poorly crystalline hydration products, such as C–S–H/C–A–S–H gels, which contribute to matrix densification. However, because these products are poorly crystalline, their formation is discussed here based on the combined interpretation of the mechanical results, SEM observations, XRD patterns, and previous studies, rather than being directly confirmed by XRD alone. When the ITP content exceeded the optimal level, the dilution effect became dominant, resulting in reduced strength.
Al 2 Si 4 O 10 OH 2 nH 2 O + 2 OH + 10 H 2 O 2 2 Al OH 4 + 4 H 4 SiO 4 + nH 2 O
2 H 4 SiO 4 2 H 3 SiO 4 + 2 H + 2 H 2 SiO 4 2 + 4 H +
Ca OH 2 Ca 2 + + 2 OH
H 2 SiO 4 2 +   Ca 2 + + 2 OH C - S - H
Al OH 4 + Ca 2 + + 2 OH C - A - H
Figure 9 presents the flexural strength development of mortars with different ITP–GBFS ratios. The data presented in the figure indicate that the addition of ITP has a significant adverse effect on the flexural strength of mortar. In the ITP mortar experimental group A1, the flexural strength at the ages of 3 d, 7 d, and 28 d was only 56.9%, 63.2%, and 90.1% of that in the pure cement control group A0, respectively. The primary reason for this phenomenon is the relatively low activity of the hydration products within ITP. During the early hydration process of cement particles, the hydration priority of ITP is minimal, and it essentially does not participate in the hydration reaction. This explains the observed reduction in early strength when ITP is incorporated. These findings are consistent with the results reported in the literature [25,33]. The incorporation of ITP into cement-based materials adversely affects their early strength. However, as the curing age increases, the gap between the flexural strength of ITP mortar and that of the pure cement control group gradually narrows. This may be attributed to the fact that the hydration-active substances present in the cement are largely consumed during the intermediate stage, allowing the substances within the ITP particles to begin dissolving and participating in the hydration reaction. This process contributes a small amount of active substances towards the end of the mortar’s hydration reaction. These observations align with the research findings presented in the literature [34,35]. Thus, the addition of ITP positively influences the later strength of cement-based materials.
The 28-day flexural strength of the tested specimens follows the descending order: A4 > A3 > A5 > A0 > A6 > A1. Notably, the A4 mixture, incorporating 20% iron tailings powder (ITP) and 30% granulated blast-furnace slag (GBFS), exhibited a 25.9% reduction in flexural strength at 3 days compared to the control group (A0). However, this early-age deficiency was rapidly compensated, achieving strength parity with A0 at 7 days and ultimately surpassing it by 35.8% at 28 days. The 28 d strength improvement of A4 indicates that ITP filling and GBFS hydration jointly enhanced the hardened matrix, which is a key finding of this study. A comparative analysis across samples A3 to A6 reveals a consistent trend in flexural strength development, with A4 achieving the highest value of 11.0 MPa at 28 days. This underscores the superior performance of the optimized ITP–GBFS composite admixture in enhancing the mechanical properties of cementitious systems. More importantly, the strength increment from 7 to 28 days in the composite admixture groups notably exceeds that of the plain cement control, indicating a more sustained and effective pozzolanic and/or hydraulic reaction over time. This delayed but pronounced strength enhancement highlights the potential of the ITP–GBFS system in improving the long-term durability and service life of concrete structures. Unlike conventional supplementary cementitious materials (SCMs) that may compromise early-age performance, the ITP–GBFS blend demonstrates a balanced strength evolution profile, indicating its potential for low-cement cementitious materials, such as in permanent infrastructure or mass concrete elements. Furthermore, this study provides experimental evidence for the potential use of ITP–GBFS composite admixtures as high-volume cement replacements in mortar.

3.2. XRD Test and Analysis

Figure 10 presents the XRD patterns of the mortar specimens cured for 28 d. XRD results showed that the addition of ITP and GBFS changed both the crystalline peaks and the amorphous background of the samples. The main crystalline phases detected in the samples included quartz, portlandite, calcite and residual clinker-related phases. The quartz peaks were mainly associated with the high SiO2 content of ITP, while portlandite was derived from the hydration of Portland cement. Calcite may have originated from the carbonation of hydration products or the raw materials.
In the A1 mixture containing 50% ITP, the intensity of the quartz peaks was relatively high, indicating that a considerable fraction of ITP remained as a crystalline and weakly reactive filler at 28 d. This is consistent with the relatively low compressive and flexural strengths of A1. In contrast, the GBFS-containing mixtures exhibited a more pronounced broad hump in the XRD background, which can be associated with amorphous or poorly crystalline hydration products. C–S–H and C–A–S–H gels were not directly detected by sharp XRD peaks because of their poor crystallinity. Therefore, their presence is inferred from the broad amorphous feature in the XRD patterns together with the SEM observations and the mechanical performance results.
In A4, the lower portlandite intensity suggested stronger secondary hydration or pozzolanic reaction, suggesting that part of the Ca(OH)2 generated by cement hydration may have been consumed during the pozzolanic reaction. Meanwhile, the presence of GBFS supplied additional Ca, Si and Al species, which favored the formation of secondary hydration products. These poorly crystalline products filled capillary pores and improved the compactness of the matrix. However, when the ITP content was further increased, the dilution effect and the accumulation of less-reactive quartz-rich particles became more significant, leading to reduced formation of effective hydration products and a decline in mechanical performance.
Overall, the XRD results indicate that the optimized ITP–GBFS ratio did not simply increase the amount of crystalline hydration products, but rather promoted the formation of amorphous or poorly crystalline binding phases. This interpretation is consistent with the SEM observations and the strength development of the A4 mixture.
Because the available XRD data were primarily used for qualitative phase identification, quantitative Rietveld refinement was not performed in the present study. Instead, the potential reactivity of ITP and GBFS was evaluated based on their chemical compositions, XRD patterns, and previously reported activity characteristics. Therefore, the discussion of reactive components in this study is qualitative rather than quantitative. Quantitative Rietveld refinement should be conducted in future work to further clarify the crystalline and amorphous contents of ITP and GBFS and to better support the design of cement replacement levels.

3.3. SEM Test Analysis

Figure 11 shows the microstructures of mortars with different ITP–GBFS proportions after 28 d curing. The rough, shell-like layer around the GBFS particles may be associated with hydration products, such as C–S–H/C–A–S–H gels and carbonate-containing phases. After a succession of coupled reactions, these products agglomerate into rod-like, spherical, and cubic morphologies, which furnish abundant heterogeneous nucleation sites for subsequent hydration and pozzolanic reactions. These hydration products filled part of the pores and improved the compactness of the matrix. A progressive densification of the microstructure is observed as the content of GBFS and ITP increases. At early ages, the matrix is characterized by abundant macropores and a honey-combed, loosely packed texture. This morphology can be attributed to the limited pozzolanic reactivity of GBFS and ITP during the initial hydration period, which results in a predominantly filler effect, while Portland cement remains the principal reactive phase. As shown in Figure 11a, reticulated C–S–H gels are distributed across the interfacial regions, accompanied by residual GBFS grains and rhombohedral calcite crystals.
The SEM observations indicate that ITP mainly acted as a filler, while GBFS supplied reactive components for further hydration, thereby accelerating the formation of hydration products. With increasing curing time, copious interpenetrating C–S–H and calcite crystals nucleate and grow, establishing a rigid load-bearing skeleton that serves as a template for further hydration. Moreover, calcite provides heterogeneous nucleation sites that promote the hydration of C3S and C2S, sustaining the generation of additional C–S–H. GBFS, an industrial by-product of steelmaking, is rich in vitreous calcium-aluminosilicate phases. Its elevated Si4+ and Al3+ contents impart latent hydraulic activity, making it a common mineral admixture in cementitious systems. The introduction of these aluminosilicate species intensifies the pozzolanic reaction within the matrix. In Figure 11b,c, needle-like and fibrous hydration products were observed to emerge progressively, supplying additional reactive substrates for subsequent hydration. The acicular calcite crystals, exhibiting high intrinsic stiffness, effectively refine the pore structure by occluding residual voids, thereby enhancing the microstructural compactness and, macroscopically, the mechanical performance of the composite.

3.4. Analysis of Resistance to Chloride Ion Penetration Test

Chloride migration resistance was tested using cylindrical specimens prepared with the designed ITP–GBFS ratios. The chloride ion penetration coefficients are illustrated in Figure 12. The permeability coefficients of chloride ions are ranked in the following order: A0 > A4 > A3 > A2 > A5 > A6 > A1. As shown in the figure, the pure cement control group exhibits the best resistance to chloride ion penetration, with a Drcm of 14.83 × 10−12 m2/s. In the experimental group with a single addition of ITP, A1 has a coefficient of 9.80 × 10−12 m2/s higher than A0, which aligns with previous studies [3,36]. However, the incorporation of excessive ITP negatively impacts the chloride ion resistance performance of the specimens. A comparison of A3 to A6 reveals that combining ITP with GBFS to create a composite admixture enhances the chloride ion penetration resistance of the specimens. This suggests that the combination of ITP and GBFS has a synergistic effect, mitigating the adverse impact of a single admixture on chloride ion resistance. The performance of A3 to A6 decreased by 30.3%, 37.2%, 16.2%, and 7.3%, respectively, compared to A1.
The chloride migration coefficient changed nonlinearly with the increase in ITP content. This behavior implies the existence of an optimal ITP dosage threshold, beyond which the durability performance deteriorates. When the ITP content exceeded 20%, the amount of unreacted ITP increased and the pore structure became less compact. However, due to the limited availability of aluminum (Al)-bearing phases, the pozzolanic reaction becomes kinetically constrained, resulting in insufficient formation of calcium-alumino-silicate-hydrate (C-A-S-H) and calcium-silicate-hydrate (C-S-H) gels. The unreacted SiO2 predominantly exists as inert micro-aggregates, which contribute minimally to microstructural densification or strength enhancement. Consequently, a substantial volume of micro-pores remains unfilled, forming interconnected capillary networks that facilitate chloride ion migration. This microstructural deficiency explains the observed increase in the chloride diffusion coefficient (Drcm) in mixtures A5 and A6, where ITP content surpasses the optimal level. A4, containing 20% ITP and 30% GBFS, showed the best chloride resistance among the composite mixtures, with a Drcm of 15.47 × 10−12 m2/s. only marginally higher (by 0.64 × 10−12 m2/s) than that of the pure cement control (A0). This suggests that the synergistic interaction between ITP and GBFS at this specific ratio can yield a refined pore structure and enhanced interfacial transition zone (ITZ) characteristics, thereby achieving chloride penetration resistance comparable to conventional Portland cement systems. This finding indicates that the optimized ITP–GBFS composite binder has potential for cement mortar applications requiring reduced cement consumption and resistance to chloride ion penetration. However, the present study only evaluated chloride migration resistance using the RCM method. Further long-term chloride exposure tests, including strength retention, chloride binding capacity and pore-structure evolution, are still required before its use in marine or coastal infrastructure can be fully assessed.

4. Conclusions

In this study, we tested the mechanical properties and chloride ion penetration resistance of GBFS-ITP composite admixture mortar at various ratios. Additionally, we analyzed the strength growth patterns through microscopic examinations. The following three main conclusions were drawn:
(1)
ITP used alone reduced mortar strength because of its low early-age reactivity. At 28 d, the compressive strength of A1 was approximately 21% lower than that of A0, indicating that ITP should not be used as the sole high-volume cement replacement without additional calcium-rich activators.
(2)
GBFS compensated for the limited reactivity of ITP and improved later-age performance. The A4 mixture containing 20% ITP and 30% GBFS showed the best overall performance among the composite mixtures. Its 28 d compressive strength reached 51.3 MPa, while its 28 d flexural strength reached 11.0 MPa.
(3)
XRD and SEM results showed that the optimized ITP–GBFS ratio improved hydration product formation and matrix compactness. The micro-filling effect of ITP and the latent hydraulic activity of GBFS jointly contributed to matrix densification.
(4)
The chloride migration coefficient of A4 was 15.47 × 10−12 m2/s, only 0.64 × 10−12 m2/s higher than that of A0. The optimized ITP–GBFS binder maintained chloride resistance close to that of plain cement mortar while reducing cement content by 50%. Nevertheless, long-term chloride exposure tests are still required to evaluate strength retention and pore-structure evolution under aggressive environments.

Author Contributions

Q.L.: Resources, Supervision. C.G.: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Methodology, Writing—original draft. G.Y.: Conceptualization, Data curation, Visualization, Methodology. W.D.: Resources. C.S.: Supervision. Z.C.: Project administration, Resources, Supervision, Writing—review and editing. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by Beijing Outstanding Young Talents (No. JWZQ20240101017), and the Scientific Research Foundation for North China University of Technology (No. 11005136025XN076-051).

Data Availability Statement

The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors on request.

Conflicts of Interest

Authors Guixiang Yi, Weiyang Duan and Chunjiang Song are employed by the Inspection and Certification Co., Ltd. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

References

  1. Wu, S.; Zhang, Y.; Chen, W.; Bing, L.; Wang, J.; Niu, L.; Liu, Z.; Xi, F. Global CO2 uptake by cement materials accounts 1930–2023. Sci. Data 2024, 11, 1400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Heravi, G.; Nafisi, T.; Mousavi, R. Evaluation of energy consumption during production and construction of concrete and steel frames of residential buildings. Energy Build. 2016, 130, 244–252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Liu, X.; Ni, C.; Meng, K.; Zhang, L.; Liu, D.; Sun, L. Strengthening mechanism of lightweight cellular concrete filled with fly ash. Constr. Build. Mater. 2020, 251, 118954. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Shen, D.; Jiao, Y.; Kang, J.; Feng, Z.; Shen, Y. Influence of ground granulated blast furnace slag on early-age cracking potential of internally cured high performance concrete. Constr. Build. Mater. 2020, 233, 117083. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Muthusamy, K.; Rasid, M.H.; Jokhio, G.A.; Budiea, A.M.A.; Hussin, M.W.; Mirza, J. Coal bottom ash as sand replacement in concrete: A review. Constr. Build. Mater. 2020, 236, 117507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Adil, G.; Kevern, J.T.; Mann, D. Influence of silica fume on mechanical and durability of pervious concrete. Constr. Build. Mater. 2020, 247, 118453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Zuccheratte, A.C.V.; Freire, C.B.; Lameiras, F.S. Synthetic gravel for concrete obtained from sandy iron ore tailing and recycled polyethyltherephtalate. Constr. Build. Mater. 2017, 151, 859–865. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Martins, N.P.; Srivastava, S.; Simão, F.V.; Niu, H.; Perumal, P.; Snellings, R.; Illikainen, M.; Chambart, H.; Habert, G. Exploring the Potential for Utilization of Medium and Highly Sulfidic Mine Tailings in Construction Materials: A Review. Sustainability 2021, 13, 12150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Adiguzel, D.; Tuylu, S.; Eker, H. Utilization of tailings in concrete products: A review. Constr. Build. Mater. 2022, 360, 129574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Garcia, F.F.; Sandoval, G.F.B.; Valadares, G.F.; Bailão, E.F.L.C.; Nabout, J.C.; Junior, G.d.F.N.G.; Almeida, L.M. Mine tailings dams’ failures: Serious environmental impacts, remote solutions, Environment. Dev. Sustain. 2025, 27, 14271–14301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Zhao, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Chen, T.; Chen, Y.; Bao, S. Preparation of high strength autoclaved bricks from hematite tailings. Constr. Build. Mater. 2012, 28, 450–455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Guo, D.; Hou, H.; Long, J.; Guo, X.; Xu, H. Underestimated environmental benefits of tailings resource utilization: Evidence from a life cycle perspective. Environ. Impact Assess. Rev. 2022, 96, 106832. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Cheng, Y.-H.; Tong, B.-Q.; Sun, X.-H.; Zhang, J.-Y. On the grinding effects of high-silicon iron tailings. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2022, 29, 73326–73340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Lu, X.; Wang, H. Microbial Oxidation of Sulfide Tailings and the Environmental Consequences. Elements 2012, 8, 119–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Rotta, L.H.S.; Alcântara, E.; Park, E.; Negri, R.G.; Lin, Y.N.; Bernardo, N.; Mendes, T.S.G.; Filho, C.R.S. The 2019 Brumadinho tailings dam collapse: Possible cause and impacts of the worst human and environmental disaster in Brazil. Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinf. 2020, 90, 102119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Edraki, M.; Baumgartl, T.; Manlapig, E.; Bradshaw, D.; Franks, D.M.; Moran, C.J. Designing mine tailings for better environmental, social and economic outcomes: A review of alternative approaches. J. Clean. Prod. 2014, 84, 411–420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Adiansyah, J.S.; Rosano, M.; Vink, S.; Keir, G. A framework for a sustainable approach to mine tailings management: Disposal strategies. J. Clean. Prod. 2015, 108, 1050–1062. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Zhao, J.; Ni, K.; Su, Y.; Shi, Y. An evaluation of iron ore tailings characteristics and iron ore tailings concrete properties. Constr. Build. Mater. 2021, 286, 122968. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Pyo, S.; Tafesse, M.; Kim, B.-J.; Kim, H.-K. Effects of quartz-based mine tailings on characteristics and leaching behavior of ultra-high performance concrete. Constr. Build. Mater. 2018, 166, 110–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Han, F.; Zhou, Y.; Zhang, Z. Effect of gypsum on the properties of composite binder containing high-volume slag and iron tailing powder. Constr. Build. Mater. 2020, 252, 119023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Simonsen, A.M.T.; Solismaa, S.; Hansen, H.K.; Jensen, P.E. Evaluation of mine tailings’ potential as supplementary cementitious materials based on chemical, mineralogical and physical characteristics. Waste Manag. 2020, 102, 710–721. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Kinnunen, P.H.M.; Kaksonen, A.H. Towards circular economy in mining: Opportunities and bottlenecks for tailings valorization. J. Clean. Prod. 2019, 228, 153–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Cheng, Y.-H.; Ma, H.-Y.; Zhang, J.-Y. Effects of siliceous iron tailings powder on performances of interface transition zone in concrete. Constr. Build. Mater. 2024, 421, 135764. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Han, F.; Zhang, H.; Liu, J.; Song, S. Influence of iron tailing powder on properties of concrete with fly ash. Powder Technol. 2022, 398, 117132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Tian, Y.; Huang, X.; Lu, X.; Jiang, J.; Yang, J.; Tian, J.; Ji, K. Mechanical properties and enhancement mechanism of iron tailings powder as a binder for manufacturing cementless ultra-high-performance alkali activated concrete. J. Build. Eng. 2025, 106, 112532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Abbas, S.N.; Qureshi, M.I. An investigation of mechanical properties of Self Compacting Concrete (SCC) after addition of Ground Granulated Blast Furnace Slag (GGBFS) and Fly Ash (FA). Mater. Chem. Phys. Sustain. Energy 2025, 2, 100008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Ayano, T.; Fujii, T. Improvement of Concrete Properties using Granulated Blast Furnace Slag Sand. J. Adv. Concr. Technol. 2021, 19, 118–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Li, G.; Zhang, A.; Song, Z.; Liu, S.; Zhang, J. Ground granulated blast furnace slag effect on the durability of ternary cementitious system exposed to combined attack of chloride and sulfate. Constr. Build. Mater. 2018, 158, 640–648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Cascardi, A.; Verre, S.; Micelli, F.; Aiello, M.A. Durability-aimed performance of glass FRCM-confined concrete cylinders: Experimental insights into alkali environmental effects. Mater. Struct. 2025, 58, 329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. GB/T 50080-2016; Standard for Test Method of Performanceon Ordinary Fresh Concrete. SAC: Beijing, China, 2016.
  31. GB/T 17671-2021; Test Method of Cement Mortar Strength (Lso Method). SAC: Beijing, China, 2021.
  32. GB/T 50082-2009; Standard for Test Methods of Long-Term Performance and Durability of Ordinary Concrete. SAC: Beijing, China, 2009.
  33. Shi, J.; Pan, W.; Kang, J.; Yu, Z.; Sun, G.; Li, J.; Zheng, K.; Shen, J. Properties of Ultra-High Performance Concrete incorporating iron tailings powder and iron tailings sand. J. Build. Eng. 2024, 83, 108442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Ouhadi, V.R.; Yong, R.N.; Deiranlou, M. Enhancement of cement-based solidification/stabilization of a lead-contaminated smectite clay. J. Hazard. Mater. 2021, 403, 123969. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Feng, W.; Yu, Z.; Bao, R.; Xiong, J.; Yan, K.; Liu, R.; Zhang, R.; Lu, X. Manufacture of tailings-based cementitious materials: Insights into tailings activation strategies. Constr. Build. Mater. 2024, 439, 137194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Maruthupandian, S.; Chaliasou, A. A Kanellopoulos, Recycling mine tailings as precursors for cementitious binders—Methods, challenges and future outlook. Constr. Build. Mater. 2021, 312, 125333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. National crude steel production, 2018–2024.
Figure 1. National crude steel production, 2018–2024.
Buildings 16 02224 g001
Figure 2. Phase composition of ITP.
Figure 2. Phase composition of ITP.
Buildings 16 02224 g002
Figure 3. SEM image of ITP.
Figure 3. SEM image of ITP.
Buildings 16 02224 g003
Figure 4. XRD pattern of GBFS.
Figure 4. XRD pattern of GBFS.
Buildings 16 02224 g004
Figure 5. Preparation process of ITP-GBFS mortar.
Figure 5. Preparation process of ITP-GBFS mortar.
Buildings 16 02224 g005
Figure 6. Flowchart of the performance research of ITP-GBFS admixtures.
Figure 6. Flowchart of the performance research of ITP-GBFS admixtures.
Buildings 16 02224 g006
Figure 7. Flowchart for the test of chloride ion migration and diffusion coefficient.
Figure 7. Flowchart for the test of chloride ion migration and diffusion coefficient.
Buildings 16 02224 g007
Figure 8. Compressive strength of mortar specimens cured for 3, 7 and 28 d under standard curing conditions.
Figure 8. Compressive strength of mortar specimens cured for 3, 7 and 28 d under standard curing conditions.
Buildings 16 02224 g008
Figure 9. Flexural strength of mortar specimens cured for 3, 7 and 28 d under standard curing conditions.
Figure 9. Flexural strength of mortar specimens cured for 3, 7 and 28 d under standard curing conditions.
Buildings 16 02224 g009
Figure 10. XRD patterns of cement mortar specimens with different ITP–GBFS ratios after curing for 28 d.
Figure 10. XRD patterns of cement mortar specimens with different ITP–GBFS ratios after curing for 28 d.
Buildings 16 02224 g010
Figure 11. SEM micrographs of mortar samples cured for 28 d: (a) A3, (b) A4, and (c) A5.
Figure 11. SEM micrographs of mortar samples cured for 28 d: (a) A3, (b) A4, and (c) A5.
Buildings 16 02224 g011
Figure 12. The chloride ion permeability resistance coefficient of the 28 d specimen.
Figure 12. The chloride ion permeability resistance coefficient of the 28 d specimen.
Buildings 16 02224 g012
Table 1. Chemical composition (wt.%).
Table 1. Chemical composition (wt.%).
SiO2Al2O3Fe2O3CaOMgOSO3MnOOther
PC20.164.563.5162.494.040.760.064.42
ITP65.485.989.227.286.210.140.195.50
GBFS25.3113.160.3048.485.783.170.593.21
Table 2. Mix ratio of mortar.
Table 2. Mix ratio of mortar.
SamplesBinder (g)w/bSand (g)
PCITPGBFS
A0450000.51350
A122522500.51350
A222502250.51350
A3225451800.51350
A4225901350.51350
A5225135900.51350
A6225180450.51350
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Yi, G.; Duan, W.; Song, C.; Geng, C.; Li, Q.; Chen, Z. Influence of Iron Tailing Powder-Granulated Blast Furnace Slag Composite Admixtures on the Mechanical Properties and Resistance to Chloride Erosion of Cement Mortar. Buildings 2026, 16, 2224. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings16112224

AMA Style

Yi G, Duan W, Song C, Geng C, Li Q, Chen Z. Influence of Iron Tailing Powder-Granulated Blast Furnace Slag Composite Admixtures on the Mechanical Properties and Resistance to Chloride Erosion of Cement Mortar. Buildings. 2026; 16(11):2224. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings16112224

Chicago/Turabian Style

Yi, Guixiang, Weiyang Duan, Chunjiang Song, Chao Geng, Quanming Li, and Zhengfa Chen. 2026. "Influence of Iron Tailing Powder-Granulated Blast Furnace Slag Composite Admixtures on the Mechanical Properties and Resistance to Chloride Erosion of Cement Mortar" Buildings 16, no. 11: 2224. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings16112224

APA Style

Yi, G., Duan, W., Song, C., Geng, C., Li, Q., & Chen, Z. (2026). Influence of Iron Tailing Powder-Granulated Blast Furnace Slag Composite Admixtures on the Mechanical Properties and Resistance to Chloride Erosion of Cement Mortar. Buildings, 16(11), 2224. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings16112224

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop