Next Article in Journal
Combined Utilization of Construction and Demolition Waste and Propylene Fiber in Cement-Stabilized Soil
Previous Article in Journal
Experimental Validation of the Model of Reverberation Time Prediction in a Room
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Comparison of Simulation and Measurement in a Short-Term Evaluation of the Thermal Comfort Parameters of an Office in a Low-Carbon Building

Department of Building Engineering and Urban Planning, Faculty of Civil Engineering, University of Zilina, Univerzitna 8215/1, 010 26 Zilina, Slovakia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Buildings 2022, 12(3), 349; https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings12030349
Submission received: 17 January 2022 / Revised: 3 March 2022 / Accepted: 9 March 2022 / Published: 14 March 2022
(This article belongs to the Section Building Energy, Physics, Environment, and Systems)

Abstract

The subject of the following analysis is the Research Centre building of the University of Zilina (RC UNIZA), which was purposely designed as a low-carbon project. The measurements of selected offices were carried out to verify how the building envelope and infill cooling system influences the indoor environment during the summer season. These measurements, along with the parameters of outdoor climate and its influence on the indoor thermal-humidity microclimate were monitored. Most of the data was then used in subsequent transient-state thermal simulation in an ESP-r program. The evaluation took two days to complete wherein an air-cooling system and ceiling radiant cooling were presented. The office during the test was not occupied and was therefore slightly cooler. Under these conditions (measured and simulated), PPD and PMV indexes were calculated during a 10 h time period with varying input parameters (metabolic heat and thermal resistance of clothing). According to the measurement and simulation, these indexes were compared. The comparison shows that the agreement depends on the chosen personal factors such as the thermal resistance of the clothing and metabolic heat. If these are chosen appropriately, then the differences between the results according to the measurement and the simulation were limited.
Keywords: thermal comfort; simulation; low-carbon; building; office; summer; overheating; window thermal comfort; simulation; low-carbon; building; office; summer; overheating; window

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ponechal, R.; Barňák, P.; Ďurica, P. Comparison of Simulation and Measurement in a Short-Term Evaluation of the Thermal Comfort Parameters of an Office in a Low-Carbon Building. Buildings 2022, 12, 349. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings12030349

AMA Style

Ponechal R, Barňák P, Ďurica P. Comparison of Simulation and Measurement in a Short-Term Evaluation of the Thermal Comfort Parameters of an Office in a Low-Carbon Building. Buildings. 2022; 12(3):349. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings12030349

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ponechal, Radoslav, Peter Barňák, and Pavol Ďurica. 2022. "Comparison of Simulation and Measurement in a Short-Term Evaluation of the Thermal Comfort Parameters of an Office in a Low-Carbon Building" Buildings 12, no. 3: 349. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings12030349

APA Style

Ponechal, R., Barňák, P., & Ďurica, P. (2022). Comparison of Simulation and Measurement in a Short-Term Evaluation of the Thermal Comfort Parameters of an Office in a Low-Carbon Building. Buildings, 12(3), 349. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings12030349

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop