Next Article in Journal
Physical, Chemical and Geotechnical Characterization of Wet Flue Gas Desulfurization Gypsum and Its Potential Application as Building Materials
Next Article in Special Issue
Fire Protection of Steel Structures with Epoxy Coatings under Cryogenic Exposure
Previous Article in Journal
Applicability of Preliminary Standards for the Hanok Comfort Evaluation Based on Spatial Indices
Previous Article in Special Issue
Fire Safety in High-Rise Buildings: Is the Stay-Put Tactic a Misjudgement or Magnificent Strategy?
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Structural Fire Protection of Steel Structures in Arctic Conditions

Buildings 2021, 11(11), 499; https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings11110499
by Marina Gravit and Daria Shabunina *
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Buildings 2021, 11(11), 499; https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings11110499
Submission received: 17 September 2021 / Revised: 17 October 2021 / Accepted: 20 October 2021 / Published: 22 October 2021
(This article belongs to the Collection Buildings and Fire Safety)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

After an introduction on the subject of fire protection of structures in the Arctic and Antarctic environment, the article deals with some experiments on specific fire protective layers. The experiments are well described and well discussed, however, there is some confusion in the identification and numbering of the experiments, in particular the words “experiment”, “sample”, and “specimen” seems to be used as synonyms.

Specific comments can be found in the attached file.

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

The paper studied the structural fire protection of steel structure in arctic condition with experimental work. However, the introduction and background information is not enough. More reference are required for the literature review. The author should also discuss the advantages and disadvantages of other related research, compared to the experimental study in this manuscript. More discussion should be given for the experimental results including the implication, the challenges, and the future work. Compared to other's work, are the results in the manuscript similar or different and what are the reasons? More information is also required in the conclusion section. 

Author Response

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round 2

Reviewer 2 Report

The comments have been addressed. 

Back to TopTop