Next Article in Journal
Exploring the Correlation between Subsurface Residual Stresses and Manufacturing Parameters in Laser Powder Bed Fused Ti-6Al-4V
Previous Article in Journal
Burnishing of FSW Aluminum Al–Cu–Li Components
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

First-Principles Calculation for the Influence of C and O on the Mechanical Properties of γ-TiAl Alloy at High Temperature

College of Science, Beijing University of Chemical Technology, Beijing 100029, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Metals 2019, 9(2), 262; https://doi.org/10.3390/met9020262
Submission received: 23 January 2019 / Revised: 15 February 2019 / Accepted: 15 February 2019 / Published: 22 February 2019

Abstract

:
The elastic constants of temperature dependence, thermal expansion coefficient and phonon dispersion relations of γ-TiAl doped with C/O have been investigated using first-principles calculations in order to gain insight into the mechanical performance of γ-TiAl in cases of high temperature. This study shows that γ-TiAl maintains stability at high temperatures introduced by C or O atoms. Importantly, the hardness increases and retains excellent resistance to external pressure. The results indicate that even if the TiAl alloy is doped with C or O atoms, it can also exhibit excellent mechanical properties at a high temperature.

1. Introduction

γ-TiAl alloys have received much attention for their broad application prospects in the aerospace, automotive, chemical and marine industries because of their low density, high specific strength and stiffness, high resistance to high temperature creep, oxidation and hydrogen embrittlement [1,2,3,4,5].
Duwez et al. [6] first reported the existence of a Ti-Al phase in titanium-aluminum binary systems and determined it structure. This laid a foundation for subsequent research. In order to gain a deeper understanding of the mechanical properties of γ-TiAl, more detailed research on basic properties is required, such as structural features, elastic behavior, phase stability and so on. Hsieh et al. [7] explored the structural characteristics of γ-TiAl. Erdely et al. [8] and Huang et al. [9] studied the changes in microstructure of γ-TiAl at high temperature. Tanaka et al. [10,11] and He et al. [12] measured the elastic constants of γ-TiAl at different temperatures and described the experimental procedures. In theory, some studies [13,14,15,16,17] have qualitatively analyzed the phase stability, structural deformation and effects of oxygen impurity of γ-TiAl by first-principles calculations. Fu et al. [18] and Zhang et al. [19] explored the mechanical and thermodynamic properties of γ-TiAl under high pressure. However, there is little theoretical research to evaluate the influence of temperature on γ-TiAl, which cannot truly reflect the performance of γ-TiAl in practical applications. In addition, the γ-TiAl phase provides many of the qualities required in innovative structural high temperature and marine applications. The evolution of elastic properties upon temperature and resistance to microbial corrosion (C, O, P, S, etc.) are similarly important [20,21,22,23,24,25,26]. Moreover, during the preparation of the alloy, oxygen and carbon atoms are easily absorbed into γ-TiAl, which affects the use of γ-TiAl. Therefore, this work is mainly to study the effect of oxygen and carbon impurities on the mechanical properties of γ-TiAl alloy at high temperature.
In this work, we obtained the temperature dependent elastic modulus by the combination of density functional perturbation theory (DFPT), quasi-harmonic approximation (QHA) method and continuum elasticity theory. Likewise, the thermal stability of γ-TiAl with oxygen and carbon impurities were analyzed by calculating the phonon dispersion curves. We showed that the interaction between individual orbital electrons of the impurity and the electrons of Ti and Al atoms by analyzing the partial densities of their respective states. These data will be helpful to the practical application of γ-TiAl alloy in the future.

2. Computational Details

According to the QHA method [27,28], the Helmholtz free energy can be expressed as: E ( V , T ) = E s t a t i c ( V ) + E p h o n ( V , T ) + E e l e c ( V , T ) , where E s t a t i c ( V ) is the total energy at 0 K, E p h o n ( V , T ) is the phonon free energy and E e l e c ( V , T ) is the thermal electronic contribution to the free energy. E s t a t i c ( V ) and E e l e c ( V , T ) can be calculated by first-principles calculations directly. Because γ-TiAl belongs to the tetragonal crystal, the six independent elastic constant deformation models of C11, C12, C13, C33, C44, C66 can be defined by the formula [29]: E ( V , δ ) = E ( V 0 , 0 ) + V 0 [ i τ i δ i ξ i + 1 2 i , j C i j δ i ξ i δ j ξ j ] , where E ( V , δ ) is the total energy for the system with respect to a small strain δ on the equilibrium cell. E ( V 0 , 0 ) and V 0 are the total energy and volume of the equilibrium cell without strains, respectively. τ i is an element in the stress tensor. ξ i / j is a factor of the Voigt index [30] and δ i / j is the small strain applied on the equilibrium cell. The sets of distortions were selected as (δ; δ; 0; 0; 0; 0), (δ; −δ; 0; 0; 0; 0), (0; 0; δ; 0; 0; 0), (0; 0; 0; δ; 0; 0), (δ; δ; δ; 0; 0; 0), (0; 0; 0; 0; 0; δ) on the equilibrium cell with a small strain δ varying from −0.03 to 0.03 in steps of 0.006, which has used in our previous work [31]. The elastic constants can be calculated by the equations: C 11 + C 12 = D 1 2 , C 11 C 12 = D 2 2 , C 33 = D 3 , C 44 = D 4 4 , 2 ( C 11 + C 12 + 2 C 13 ) + C 33 = D 5 and C 66 = D 6 , where D i ( i = 1 6 ) represents the second-order strain derivatives of the Helmholtz free energy under the above six kinds of deformation forms, respectively.
The structural optimization and mechanical properties were calculated using first principles calculations based on density functional theory (DFT) [32,33] in the Vienna Ab initio Simulation Package (VASP) code [34]. The ion-electron interaction was expressed by the projector augmented wave (PAW) method [35]. The exchange correlation energy of the electrons is described by generalized gradient approximation (GGA) with the Perdew-Burke-Ernzerhof (PBE) [36,37] form. The energy cutoff was set to 600 eV and the Brillouin-zone (BZ) sampling was performed for 7 × 7 × 7 k-point Monkhorst-Pack mesh [38]. The self-consistent convergence of the total energy was set to 10−6 eV/atom and the maximum force on the atom was below 10−5 eV/Å. In this work, we used the 2 × 2 × 2 supercell containing 16 Ti and 16 Al atoms, respectively. The concentrations of C and O are both set to 3.03 at%, which is below the solubility limit of C/O in TiAl lattice [16,17]. The kinetic stability was discussed using the phonon spectra calculations in PHONOPY code [39].

3. Results and Discussion

In our previous work [31], especially for two equivalent types of the pentahedral (P1, P2) sites and octahedral (O1, O2) sites, the ideal positions have been determined by comparing the formation energy of the sites. The ideal positions of C and O atoms in the γ-TiAl alloy have been optimized and shown in Figure 1. The solution sites of the C atoms are in the O position of the octahedral center, and the O atoms are in the P position of the pentahedral center, respectively. The Helmholtz free energy in different crystal volumes at finite temperature was calculated by using the QHA method (see Figure 2). Equilibrium volume can be obtained by fitting the data to the Vinet equation of states for each temperature. It can be found that the equilibrium volume increases with increasing temperature. The relationship of volume and temperature is shown in Figure 3. As is seen, the volume of TiAlO is larger than that of TiAlC at different temperatures. The constant volume thermal expansion is shown in Figure 4. When the temperature is higher than 100 K, the two lines are separated and the thermal expansion coefficient of TiAlO is gradually larger than that of TiAlC. At 850 K, the thermal expansion coefficient for TiAlC is about 3.64 × 10 5 K 1 and for TiAlO is about 3.80 × 10 5 K 1 . Both values are larger than the 3.55 × 10 5 K 1 value of pure γ-TiAl [31], indicating that C and O atoms easily make γ-TiAl deform at high temperature. In order to analyze the stability of TiAlC and TiAlO at different temperatures, we calculated the phonon dispersion curves at 0 K, 300 K, and 850 K as shown in Figure 5. Obviously, there are no unstable branches with negative vibrational frequencies, indicating that TiAlO and TiAlC are dynamically stable.
The elastic constant can be thought of as the strain derivative of the Helmholtz free energy [40,41]. We derived the elastic constants from the second order coefficients by polynomial fitting the Helmholtz free energy densities to strain. The relationship between Helmholtz free energy and strain δ upon temperature for C11-C12 and C66 is shown in Figure 6. It shows that the energy curve changes significantly with the increases of temperature and strain. The elastic constants at different temperatures are listed in Table 1. For comparison, the temperature is chosen as same to our previous work [31]. The mechanical stability criteria [42] for tetragonal crystal of C 11 > | C 12 | , 2 C 13 2 < C 33 ( C 11 + C 12 ) , C 44 > 0 , C 66 > 0 is applied for stability analysis. More importantly, γ-TiAl alloy can maintain excellent mechanical properties doped with C/O atoms. Most of the elastic constants are generally reduced with temperature. However, C11, C66 of TiAlC and C12 of TiAlO have a significant increase at 620 K.
The bulk modulus (B), shear modulus (G), Young’s modulus (E) and Poisson’s ratio (ν) can be calculated by using the following equations [43]: B = 1 2 ( B V + B R ) , G = 1 2 ( G V + G R ) , E = 9 G B ( 3 B + G ) and v = ( 3 B 2 G ) [ 2 ( 3 B + G ) ] , where subscript V denotes the Voigt bound and R denotes the Reuss bound [43,44,45]. The data are listed in Table 2 and are shown in Figure 7. There are some fluctuations in these data, which may be caused by the limitations of the QHA method. The same phenomenon can be found in some thermodynamic calculations of metals [27,46,47,48]. In addition, only a small part of the range causes fluctuations, which will not affect the entire trend. From Table 2, as the temperature increases from 0 K to 850 K, B, G and E of TiAlC decrease by 12%, 13%, 12%, while they decrease by 12%, 13%, 13% for TiAlO, respectively. The B, G and E of pure γ-TiAl decrease by 8%, 22%, 20% respectively and ν increase from 0.258 to 0.290 [31]. Although the incorporation of C or O atoms deteriorates the decline of B for γ-TiAl, it is excellent to improve G and E of γ-TiAl. In addition, the B of TiAlC and TiAlO are 107.51 GPa and 106.09 GPa at 850 K, respectively, which is similar to the B of γ-TiAl (108.4 GPa). This indicates that γ-TiAl doped with C/O atoms also keep strong resistance to external pressure at high temperature. However, the Poisson’s ratio decreases significantly for TiAlC and TiAlO compared with pure γ-TiAl.
As is shown in Figure 7a–c, all the modulus of the TiAlC and TiAlO phases are decreasing along with the increase of temperature in the range of 0 K to 500 K. In addition, the modulus of TiAlC and TiAlO is higher than that of γ-TiAl alloy before 500 K. The phenomenon indicates that the resisting compression and shear deformation of γ-TiAl can be improved by appropriately adding O atoms below 500 K. Up to 500 K, the bulk modulus of the TiAlC and TiAlO phase continues to decrease, while the other modulus have significant variations. The bulk modulus of TiAlO is significantly lower than that of γ-TiAl, while the other modulus of TiAlC and TiAlO remain higher than that of γ-TiAl, indicating that O has a greater effect on γ-TiAl to resist external pressure above 500 K. In Figure 7d, the ν of TiAlO gradually decreases, while the ν of TiAlC gradually increases below 500 K and they have rebound trends above 500 K.
It is known that the bulk modulus or shear modulus can measure hardness in an indirect way and Young’s modulus is generally used to provide a measure of solid stiffness [49,50,51,52]. Poisson’s ratio can provide more information about the binding characteristics than other elastic constants [50]. The smaller the Poisson’s ratio, the better the crystal’s shear stability. From Table 2, it can be found that the incorporation of C and O atoms can increase the shear stability of γ-TiAl alloy. In addition, the high (low) G/B value is related to the brittleness (ductility) of the material and the critical value of the separation ductility, and brittle material is about 0.57 [52]. In Table 2, the values of G/B of TiAlC are all greater than 0.57. Therefore, the toughness can be decreased and the brittleness can be increased for γ-TiAl doped with C. For TiAlO, it is less than 0.57 at temperatures ranging from 620–850 K. The other is around 0.57, showing that the ductility can be weakened and the brittleness can be increased for the γ-TiAl doped with O. In general, the ductility of the γ-TiAl alloy doped with C/O atoms can be impaired, but its hardness can be enhanced.
Previous studies [53,54] have proven that the mechanical properties of TiAl alloys are related to chemical bonds. The Ti(3d)-Al(3p) covalent bonds can present a large barrier to the plastic deformation and weaken the ductility of the TiAl alloy, due to the strong bonding directionality [53,54]. The partial density of states is plotted in Figure 8. As is seen in Figure 8a, the 3d orbital electrons of Ti play a dominant role. The 3d orbital electrons of the Ti atoms and the 3p orbital electrons of Al atoms show obvious hybridization at the Fermi energy level. From Figure 8b, we can see that the γ-TiAl alloy exhibits an electronic state at −11.39 eV, and the 3d-Ti orbitals and the 3p- and 3s-Al orbitals hybridize with the 2s-C orbitals, indicating that there is a new energy state (bonding state) and strengthen Ti(3d)-Al(3p) covalent bonds. In addition, the number of 3p-Al orbital electrons increase slightly and the number of 3d-Ti orbital electrons still maintain a high value at the Fermi energy level. In Figure 8c, the electronic density of states occurs at −8.64 eV. However, the 3s-Al orbitals and the 2p-O orbitals have a significant hybridization and the energy range of hybridization is −9 to −5 eV, which indicates that a new energy state (bonding state) is formed here. Further, the number of 3p-Al orbital electrons and 3d-Ti orbital electrons have similar changes to TiAlC at the Fermi energy level, indicating that Ti(3d)-Al(3p) covalent bonds can be enhanced at the Fermi energy level because of the incorporation of C and O atoms. In summary, since the hybridization strength of TiAlC is higher than that of TiAlO, the increase in hardness of γ-TiAl alloy by the C atom is more obvious. Although the hybridization of TiAlO is weak, the hybridization range is relatively wide. Therefore, the hardness of the γ-TiAl alloy is also improved. In addition, the incorporation of the C or O atoms lead to an increase in the hybridization strength of 3d-Ti orbital electrons and 3p-Al orbital electrons, which results in an enhancement in the Ti(3d)-Al(3p) covalent bonds. Therefore, there is an increase in brittleness and a decrease in ductility of the γ-TiAl alloy.

4. Conclusions

We have studied the effects of C and O atoms on the mechanical properties of γ-TiAl at high temperature by combining first-principles calculations, QHA methods and continuous elastic theory. The phonon dispersion curves show that TiAlC and TiAlO are dynamically stable. The B, E, G and ν of TiAlC and TiAlO show that the incorporation of C and O atoms can increase the hardness of the γ-TiAl alloy and maintain excellent resistance to external pressure at high temperature. However, the ductility of the γ-TiAl alloy is gradually weakened and the brittleness is gradually increased. By analyzing the hybridization between the orbital electrons of each atom in PDOS, the hybridization strength of TiAlC is higher than that of TiAlO, which results in a greater improvement of hardness. Meanwhile, C and O atoms lead to an enhancement in the Ti(3d)-Al(3p) covalent bonds so that the ductility of the γ-TiAl alloy is reduced. Although C and O atoms weaken the ductility of the γ-TiAl, it can still maintain excellent mechanical properties at high temperature.

Author Contributions

X.S. and Y.L. conceived and designed the researchs; J.W. performed the researchs; J.W. and X.S. analyzed the data; X.S. contributed the analysis tools; J.W. wrote the paper.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 11604008) and by BUCT Fund for Disciplines Construction (Project No. XK1702).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Kumpfert, J.; Kim, Y.W.; Dimiduk, D.M. Effect of microstructure on fatigue and tensile properties of the gamma TiAl alloy Ti-46.5Al-3.0Nb-2.1Cr-0.2W. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 1995, 192–193, 465–473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Mishin, Y.; Herzig, C. Diffusion in the Ti–Al System. Acta Mater. 2000, 48, 589–623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Wallgram, W.; Schmölzer, T.; Cha, L.; Das, G.; Güther, V.; Clemens, H. Technology and mechanical properties of advanced γ-TiAl based alloys. Int. J. Mater. Res. 2009, 100, 1021–1030. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Appel, F.; Clemens, H.; Oehring, M. Recent Advances in Development and Processing of Titanium Aluminide Alloys. Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 2001, 646. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Chen, G.; Peng, Y.; Zheng, G.; Qi, Z.; Wang, M.; Yu, H.; Dong, C.; Liu, C.L. Polysynthetic twinned TiAl single crystals for high-temperature applications. Nat. Mater. 2016, 15, 876. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Duwez, P.; Taylor, J.L. Crystal Structure of TiAl. JOM 1952, 4, 70–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Hsieh, K.-C.; Austinchang, Y.; Freeman, A.J.; Oguchi, T.; Xu, J.-H. Thermodynamic and structural parameters of the body-center tetragonal TiAl phase. Scr. Metall. 1988, 22, 1267–1272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Erdely, P.; Stark, A.; Clemens, H.; Mayer, S. In-situ High-energy X-ray Diffraction on an Intermetallic β-stabilised γ-TiAl Based Alloy. BHM 2015, 160, 221–225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Huang, Z.W.; Lin, J.P.; Sun, H.L. Microstructural changes and mechanical behaviour of a near lamellar γ-TiAl alloy during long-term exposure at 700 °C. Intermetallics 2017, 85, 59–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Tanaka, K.; Koiwa, M. Single-crystal elastic constants of intermetallic compounds. Intermetallics 1996, 4, S29–S39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Tanaka, K.; Ichitsubo, T.; Inui, H.; Yamaguchi, M.; Koiwa, M. Single-crystal elastic constants of γ-TiAl. Philos. Mag. Lett. 1996, 73, 71–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. He, Y.; Schwarz, R.B.; Darling, T.; Hundley, M.; Whang, S.H.; Wang, Z.M. Elastic constants and thermal expansion of single crystal γ-TiAl from 300 to 750 K. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 1997, 239–240, 157–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Zou, J.; Fu, C.L.; Yoo, M.H. Phase stability of intermetallics in the Al-Ti system: A first-principles total-energy investigation. Intermetallics 1995, 3, 265–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Tang, P.-Y.; Huang, G.-H.; Xie, Q.-L.; Li, J.-Y. Ideal shear strength and deformation behaviours of L10 TiAl from first-principles calculations. Bull. Mater. Sci. 2016, 39, 1411–1418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Liu, Y.L.; Liu, L.M.; Wang, S.Q.; Ye, H.Q. First-principles study of shear deformation in TiAl and Ti3Al. Intermetallics 2007, 15, 428–435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Liu, Y.; Chen, K.; Zhang, J.; Hu, Z.; Lu, G.; Kioussis, N. Electronic effects of oxygen and vanadium impurities in TiAl. J. Phys. Condens. Matter 1997, 9, 9829–9843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Zhou, H.-B.; Wei, Y.; Liu, Y.-L.; Zhang, Y.; Lu, G.-H. First-principles investigation of site preference and bonding properties of alloying element in TiAl with O impurity. Modell. Simul. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2010, 18, 015007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Fu, H.; Zhao, Z.; Liu, W.; Peng, F.; Gao, T.; Cheng, X. Ab initio calculations of elastic constants and thermodynamic properties of γTiAl under high pressures. Intermetallics 2010, 18, 761–766. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Zhang, C.; Hou, H.; Zhao, Y.; Yang, X.; Guo, Y. First-principles study on structural, elastic and thermal properties of γ-TiAl and α2-Ti3Al phases in TiAl-based alloy under high pressure. Int. J. Mod. Phys. B 2017, 31, 1750079. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Zhang, Z.G.; Peng, Y.P.; Mao, Y.L.; Pang, C.J.; Lu, L.Y. Effect of hot-dip aluminizing on the oxidation resistance of Ti-6Al-4V alloy at high temperatures. Corros. Sci. 2012, 55, 187–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Cheng, J.; Li, F.; Zhu, S.; Yu, Y.; Qiao, Z.; Yang, J. Electrochemical corrosion and tribological evaluation of TiAl alloy for marine application. Tribol. Int. 2017, 115, 483–492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Du, H.L.; Datta, P.K.; Burnell-gray, J.S.; Lewis, D.B. Effect of Nb coating on the sulphidation/oxidation behaviour of Ti and Ti-6Al-4V alloy. J. Mater. Sci. 1995, 30, 2640–2647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Pedersen, A.; Hermansson, M. Inhibition of Metal Corrosion by Bacteria. Biofouling 1991, 3, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Lei, F.; Liu, L.; Yu, Z.; Gao, M.; Li, Y.; Wang, F. Corrosion Behavior of Ti60 Alloy under a Solid NaCl Deposit in a Wet Oxygen Flow at 600 °C. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 29019. [Google Scholar]
  25. Wu, X.; Hu, D.; Loretto, M.H. Alloy and process development of TiAl. J. Mater. Sci. 2004, 39, 3935–3940. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Zhang, W.; Gao, L.; Li, J.; Yang, B.; Yin, Y. TiAl/B4C marine material-Fabrication, mechanical and corrosion properties. Ceram. Int. 2011, 37, 783–789. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Wang, Y.; Liu, Z.-K.; Chen, L.-Q. Thermodynamic properties of Al, Ni, NiAl, and Ni3Al from first-principles calculations. Acta Mater. 2004, 52, 2665–2671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Guo, Z.-C.; Luo, F.; Zhang, X.-L.; Yuan, C.-Y.; Lin, C.-A.; Cai, L.-C. First-principles calculations of elastic, phonon and thermodynamic properties of W. Mol. Phys. 2016, 114, 3430–3436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Fast, F.; Wills, J.M.; Johansson, B.; Eriksson, O. Elastic constants of hexagonal transition metals: Theory. Phys. Rev. B 1995, 51, 17431–17438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Voigt, W. Lehrburch der Kristallphys; Vieweg + Teubner Verlag: Leipzig, Germany, 1928. [Google Scholar]
  31. Wang, J.-H.; Lu, Y.; Zhang, X.-L.; Shao, X.-H. The elastic behaviors and theoretical tensile strength of γ-TiAl alloy from the first principles calculations. Intermetallics 2018, 101, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Hohenberg, P.; Kohn, W. Inhomogeneous Electron Gas. Phys. Rev. 1964, 136, B864–B871. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Kohn, W.; Sham, L.J. Self-consistent Equations Including Exchange and Correlation Effects. Phys. Rev. 1965, 140, A1133–A1138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Kresse, G.; Furthmüller, J. Efficient iterative schemes for ab initio total-energy calculations using a plane-wave basis set. Phys. Rev. B 1996, 54, 11169–11186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Blöchl, P.E. Projector augmented-wave method. Phys. Rev. B 1994, 50, 17953–17979. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Perdew, J.P.; Burke, K.; Ernzerhof, M. Generalized Gradient Approximation Made Simple. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1996, 77, 3865–3868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Hammer, B.; Hansen, L.B.; Nørskov, J.K. Improved adsorption energetics within density-functional theory using revised Perdew-Burke-Ernzerhof functionals. Phys. Rev. B 1999, 59, 7413–7421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Monkhorst, H.J.; Pack, J.D. Special points for Brillouin-zone integrations. Phys. Rev. B 1976, 13, 5188–5192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Togo, A.; Oba, F.; Tanaka, I. First-principles calculations of the ferroelastic transition between rutile-type and CaCl2-type SiO2 at high pressures. Phys. Rev. B 2008, 78, 134106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Zhao, J.; Winey, J.M.; Gupta, Y.M. First-principles calculations of second-and third-order elastic constants for single crystals of arbitrary symmetry. Phys. Rev. B 2007, 75, 094105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Shao, T.; Wen, B.; Melnik, R.; Yao, S.; Kawazoe, Y.; Tian, Y. Temperature dependent elastic constants for crystals with arbitrary symmetry: Combined first principles and continuum elasticity theory. J. Appl. Phys. 2012, 111, 083525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Mouhat, F.; Coudert, F.-X. Necessary and sufficient elastic stability conditions in various crystal systems. Phys. Rev. B 2014, 90, 224104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Wu, Z.-J.; Zhao, E.-J.; Xiang, H.-P.; Hao, X.-F.; Liu, X.-J.; Meng, J. Crystal structures and elastic properties of superhard IrN2 and IrN3 from first principles. Phys. Rev. B 2007, 76, 054115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Hill, R. The Elastic Behaviour of a Crystalline Aggregate. Proc. Phys. Soc. A 1952, 65, 349–354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Reuss, A. Berechnung der Fließgrenze von Mischkristallen auf Grund der Plastizitätsbedingung für Einkristalle. Z. Angew. Math. Mech. 1929, 9, 49–58. (In German) [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Hu, C.H.; Chen, D.M.; Wang, Y.M.; Yang, K. First-principles investigations of isotope effects in themodynamic properties of TiX2 (X = H, D, and T) system. J. Alloy. Comp. 2008, 450, 369–374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Kelkar, T.; Kanhere, D.G.; Pal, S. First principles calculations of thermal equations of state and thermodynamical properties of MgH2 at finite temperatures. Comput. Mater. Sci. 2008, 42, 510–516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Fang, H.; Liu, B.; Liu, X.; Huang, S.; Ni, C.; Li, Z.; Wang, R. High-pressure lattice dynamic and thermodynamic properties of Ir by first-principles calculation. Phys. B 2010, 405, 732–737. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Teter, D.M. Computational Alchemy: The Search for New Superhard Materials. MRS Bull 1998, 23, 22–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Peng, F.; Chen, D.; Yang, X. First-principles calculations on elasticity of OsN2 under pressure. Solid State Commun. 2009, 149, 2135–2138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Brazhkin, V.V.; Lyapin, A.G.; Popova, S.V.; Antonov, Y.V.; Kluev, Y.A.; Naletov, A.M. Mechanical Properties of the Superhard Polymeric and Disordered Phases Prepared From C60, C70, and C2N under High Pressure. Rev. High Pressure Sci. Technol. 1998, 7, 989–991. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Pugh, S.F. XCII. Relations between the elastic moduli and the plastic properties of polycrystalline pure metals. Philos. Mag. 1954, 45, 823–843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Morinaga, M.; Saito, J.; Yukawa, N.; Adachi, H. Electronic effect on the ductility of alloyed TiAl compound. Acta Metall. Mater. 1990, 38, 25–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Song, Y.; Xu, D.S.; Yang, R.; Li, D.; Hu, Z.Q. Theoretical investigation of ductilizing effects of alloying elements on TiAl. Intermetallics 1998, 6, 157–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. A 2 × 2 × 2 supercell of γ-TiAl matrix marked with the pentahedron (P) site and octahedral (O) site represented as gray spheres, where Ti atoms are represented as purple spheres and Al atoms are represented as blue spheres.
Figure 1. A 2 × 2 × 2 supercell of γ-TiAl matrix marked with the pentahedron (P) site and octahedral (O) site represented as gray spheres, where Ti atoms are represented as purple spheres and Al atoms are represented as blue spheres.
Metals 09 00262 g001
Figure 2. Volume-dependent Helmholtz free energy of TiAlC (a) and TiAlO (b). Red lines connect the equilibrium volume with the minimum free energy at every temperature, where red cross indicates the equilibrium volume of each temperature.
Figure 2. Volume-dependent Helmholtz free energy of TiAlC (a) and TiAlO (b). Red lines connect the equilibrium volume with the minimum free energy at every temperature, where red cross indicates the equilibrium volume of each temperature.
Metals 09 00262 g002
Figure 3. Volumetric expansion as a function of temperature for TiAlC and TiAlO, where the solid line represents TiAlC and the dashed line represents TiAlO.
Figure 3. Volumetric expansion as a function of temperature for TiAlC and TiAlO, where the solid line represents TiAlC and the dashed line represents TiAlO.
Metals 09 00262 g003
Figure 4. The volume thermal expansion coefficient as a function of temperature, where the solid line represents TiAlC and the dashed line represents TiAlO.
Figure 4. The volume thermal expansion coefficient as a function of temperature, where the solid line represents TiAlC and the dashed line represents TiAlO.
Metals 09 00262 g004
Figure 5. Phonon dispersion relations of TiAlC (a) and TiAlO (b) along high-symmetry q points in Brillouin zone at 0 K, 300 K, and 850 K, respectively.
Figure 5. Phonon dispersion relations of TiAlC (a) and TiAlO (b) along high-symmetry q points in Brillouin zone at 0 K, 300 K, and 850 K, respectively.
Metals 09 00262 g005
Figure 6. The relationship between Helmholtz free energy and strain δ upon temperature for (a) C11-C12 of TiAlC, (b) C66 of TiAlC, (c) C11-C12 of TiAlO and (d) C66 of TiAlO, respectively.
Figure 6. The relationship between Helmholtz free energy and strain δ upon temperature for (a) C11-C12 of TiAlC, (b) C66 of TiAlC, (c) C11-C12 of TiAlO and (d) C66 of TiAlO, respectively.
Metals 09 00262 g006
Figure 7. The calculated temperature dependent elastic modulus of (a) bulk modulus (B), (b) shear modulus (G), (c) Young’s modulus (E), and (d) Poisson’s ratio (ν) for TiAlC, TiAlO and pure γ-TiAl.
Figure 7. The calculated temperature dependent elastic modulus of (a) bulk modulus (B), (b) shear modulus (G), (c) Young’s modulus (E), and (d) Poisson’s ratio (ν) for TiAlC, TiAlO and pure γ-TiAl.
Metals 09 00262 g007
Figure 8. The partial densities of states of pure γ-TiAl (a), TiAlC (b), TiAlO (c).
Figure 8. The partial densities of states of pure γ-TiAl (a), TiAlC (b), TiAlO (c).
Metals 09 00262 g008
Table 1. The calculated elastic constants of TiAlC and TiAlO at different temperatures.
Table 1. The calculated elastic constants of TiAlC and TiAlO at different temperatures.
PhaseTemperature (K)C11 (GPa)C12 (GPa)C13 (GPa)C33 (GPa)C44 (GPa)C66 (GPa)
TiAl0 a171.689.791.3172.2114.565.4
0 b16485.581.04178.57109.672.6
0 c167.487.786.1164.2111.173.7
0 d18774.874.818210981.2
298 d18374.174.417810578.4
300 e186727417610177
300 a161.288.291.3157.8109.665.7
410 a157.787.291.4149.3108.465.3
500 a158.881.093.2145.4107.265.1
620 a152.980.895.9144.1104.768.9
740 a151.179.096.1137.0103.363.0
850 a148.082.495.4133.3101.762.5
TiAlC0191.092.487.6181.9109.566.0
300181.985.985.8169.9102.762.3
410178.884.285.4166.1100.761.2
500175.181.984.5161.498.259.7
620178.178.983.1155.398.362.2
740175.476.880.7160.695.561.2
850171.974.879.7156.193.059.2
TiAlO0181.491.592.3172.4109.768.2
300173.884.488.2164.9103.066.3
410171.282.587.1162.8101.165.3
500164.471.694.4161.8106.969.3
620162.578.286.0156.096.660.4
740161.476.883.9157.295.961.8
850158.974.484.3150.994.360.7
a [31]; b [18]; c [19]; d [11]; e [12].
Table 2. The calculated elastic modulus, including the bulk modulus (B), shear modulus (G), Young’ s modulus (E), Poisson’ s ratio (ν), and G/B of TiAlC and TiAlO at different temperatures (K).
Table 2. The calculated elastic modulus, including the bulk modulus (B), shear modulus (G), Young’ s modulus (E), Poisson’ s ratio (ν), and G/B of TiAlC and TiAlO at different temperatures (K).
PhaseTemperature (K)B (GPa)G (GPa)E (GPa)νG/B
TiAl0 a117.867.9171.10.2580.576
0 b110.6968.57170.500.260.619
0 c113.168.1170.20.2490.602
0 d111.6478.36190.510.2160.702
298 d109.9775.68184.670.2200.688
300 e109.7674.83182.920.2220.682
300 a113.562.9159.40.2660.554
410 a111.660.8154.30.2690.545
500 a110.960.1152.50.2710.541
620 a110.557.6147.20.2780.521
740 a109.154.7140.50.2850.501
850 a108.452.9136.60.2900.488
TiAlC0122.072.2180.90.2530.592
300116.567.6169.90.2570.580
410114.866.1166.30.2590.576
500112.564.3162.00.2600.571
620111.165.2163.60.2530.587
740109.765.0162.80.2530.593
850107.563.1158.40.2540.587
TiAlO0120.868.9173.70.2600.571
300114.966.0166.10.2590.574
410113.164.9163.50.2590.574
500112.164.5162.30.2590.575
620109.060.9154.10.2650.559
740107.761.5155.00.2600.571
850106.159.7150.80.2630.563
a [31]; b [18]; c [19]; d [11]; e [12].

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Wang, J.; Lu, Y.; Shao, X. First-Principles Calculation for the Influence of C and O on the Mechanical Properties of γ-TiAl Alloy at High Temperature. Metals 2019, 9, 262. https://doi.org/10.3390/met9020262

AMA Style

Wang J, Lu Y, Shao X. First-Principles Calculation for the Influence of C and O on the Mechanical Properties of γ-TiAl Alloy at High Temperature. Metals. 2019; 9(2):262. https://doi.org/10.3390/met9020262

Chicago/Turabian Style

Wang, Jiahua, Yong Lu, and Xiaohong Shao. 2019. "First-Principles Calculation for the Influence of C and O on the Mechanical Properties of γ-TiAl Alloy at High Temperature" Metals 9, no. 2: 262. https://doi.org/10.3390/met9020262

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop