4.1. Effects of Heat Treatments on Microstructures
The process of SS-PREP
® powder preparation involves rapid solidification and insufficient diffusion [
23]. Due to the partial phase transition of α → α
2 + γ under rapid cooling, the powders primarily consist of the α
2 phase. When subjected to hot powder isostatic pressing at 1260 °C, the metastable α
2 phase almost completely transforms into the γ phase, as illustrated in
Figure 4. The oxide scale on the surface of particles impedes the metallurgical bonding and the element diffusion [
27], resulting in the prior particle boundaries, as shown in
Figure 5a.
Table 6 shows that the TI value of as-HIP material is just 3.96, suggesting the random orientation. The HIP alloy powder has isotropic properties and no preferred orientation since the powders that are loaded into the envelope undergo isotropic pressure and heat throughout the HIP process.
γ-TiAl alloys can exhibit four typical microstructures [
5]: FL, NL, duplex, and near γ, forming under different heat treatment processes. Generally, the near-γ microstructure has coarse grains and poor performance at both room and high temperatures, while the NL structure has poor plasticity at room temperature. In contrast, FL and duplex structures have the ideal combination of ductility and toughness at room temperature.
When the alloy is heat treated according to T1 and T2, the alloy almost entirely transforms into the α phase during 1420 °C holding in α single-phase field, and the γ phase precipitates from the α phase to form the FL structure in the subsequent cooling process. Compared to as-HIP material, the TI values rise following various heat treatments, especially T1, primarily because of the identified area having almost just one coarse lamellar colony. T1 exhibits a relatively high degree of supercooling and a significant phase transformation driving force. This promotes the rapid nucleation and growth of the γ phase through twinning, thereby producing a large number of Σ3 twinned boundaries, as illustrated in
Table 5. When annealing at a lower temperature above T
α for T3 heat treatment, the NL structure is obtained after air cooling, and γ phase is distributed between γ/α
2 lamellae. The fraction of lamellae grows significantly, the lamellar structures sharpen, and the lamellae are slightly coarsened with adding furnace cooling before air cooling, as reported by T4 and T5. According to T6, adding stress relieving annealing does not result in any appreciable changes. For peritectic TiAl alloys, after treating in the γ single phase region (during the HIP process) to obtain near γ structure, and then treating in α + γ two-phase region during the cooling process, the Widmanstätten α
2 lath will be precipitated along four groups close-packed planes of γ phase, as the microstructure after T7 heat treatment.
The α-dominated convolved NL structure is obtained through heat holding in α single-phase region when the alloy is heat treated according to T8. Adding a small amount of Ta can facilitate the formation of metastable structures by relaxing the cooling rate requirements for metastable transition [
28]. The interfaces between γ/metastable γ are low-energy interfaces, including Σ3 (massive γ), Σ5 (feather), and Σ11 (Widmanstätten) CSL interfaces [
29]. Ta atoms can enhance the nucleation and twinning of metastable structures by reducing the interface energy [
28] and the phase transition resistance by substituting Al atoms on or near the interface, such as Σ3 interfaces, 120° rotation interfaces, and anti-phase domain boundaries. Due to the slow diffusion rate of the Ta element, the α→γ
m massive transition can be completed at a slower cooling rate, and the massive structure can be obtained from air cooling in the α single phase [
19]. When the metastable γ
m ages in the α
2 + γ two-phase region, the newly precipitated α
2 maintains a strict orientation relationship with γ: {111}γ ∥ {0001}α
2, <110>γ ∥ <11
0>α
2. α
2 can nucleate on four {111}γ planes at the same time, and the massive transition leads to the formation of a large number of defects in γ
m, such as anti-phase domain boundaries, stack faults, twins, and dislocation steps [
22], which provide a large number of sites for α
2 nucleation. Therefore, α
2 can nucleate in many places and orientations, eventually forming a fine structure composed of convolved α
2 + γ lamellae.
According to previous studies [
13,
14], the fine fully lamellar structure can be achieved through cyclic heat treatments of cast TiAl-Ta alloys, taking into account the massive transformation characteristics of Ta-containing TiAl alloys from the α single-phase region during air cooling. Fortunately, powder metallurgy TiAl alloys exhibit a relatively uniform composition and fine microstructure in their initial state. Therefore, by brief heat holding in α single-phase region, to obtain an α single-phase dominant microstructure, γ lamellae and metastable structures can precipitate from α phases during slow cooling to the α + γ two-phase region. These structures have different crystal orientations compared to the parent phases [
20], resulting in refined lamellae and metastable structures during the cooling process. Subsequently, air cooling until ambient temperature can prevent lamellar coarsening and grain growth. The γ lamellar growth is governed by long-range diffusions, while massive γ structures are controlled by short-range diffusions [
30]. Since lamellar growth relies on diffusions [
31], it is expected that Ta, being a slow diffuser, will decelerate the growth of lamellae during air cooling [
32]. Recovery and recrystallization occur during stress relief annealing at 850 °C, stimulated by internal stress and stored energy of metastable structures, thereby stabilizing metastable structures with the elimination of internal stress and defects [
14]. With the extension of annealing duration, the grain size is basically unchanged, and low ΣCSL GBs, particularly the coherent Σ3 grain boundaries, increase further. The coherent Σ3 boundaries can create the dislocation slip path, improve the dislocation slip, and uniform the plastic deformation, thereby contributing to plastic deformation [
33,
34]. As a result, the dislocations easily slide along the Σ3 boundaries, avoiding the hardening resulting from the dislocation accumulation [
35]. Finally, the NL Ti-48Al-3Nb-1.5Ta alloy with a relatively fine microstructure was obtained by a simple T6 heat treatment, which met the application requirements.
4.2. Effects of Heat Treatments on Tensile Performance
Although the grain size is small after the T8 heat treatment, the structure is a convolved lamella + near-γ structure, and the tensile fracture strain at room temperature is as low as the as-HIP material. Similarly, the fracture strain with a coarse FL structure after T1 heat treatment does not show significant improvement. In contrast, the tensile property is improved significantly at room temperature after T5 heat treatment, which is a NL structure with a moderate grain size. After stress relief annealing based on T5, the density of dislocation and other defects are reduced due to the recovery, the tensile strength is reduced by 26 MPa, and the fracture strain is increased to 1.2%, which is better than Ti46Al8Nb alloy and Ti46Al8Ta alloy [
11]. Nanotwins, as shown in
Figure 7, contribute to improved mechanical properties by hindering dislocation movement [
36]. Even so, the fractures with different heat treatments are all river patterns, as shown in
Figure 11. Combined with the microstructures and grain sizes after different heat treatments in Chapter 3.2, it can be seen that the mechanical properties are affected not only by the size of the microstructure but also by the microstructure type [
1,
4].
Compared with as-HIP material, the remarkable increases in strength and elongation of heat-treated alloys are mainly due to the refinement and morphological regulation. The refined microstructure is obtained through the metastable structure evolution according to the designed heat treatment, improving plastic incompatibilities and yielding uniformity during the plastic deformation [
37]. In addition, more interfaces can hinder the dislocation movements, thus increasing strength [
38]. In contrast, for the coarse microstructure, stress is more likely to concentrate in certain places, such as triple junctions, resulting in local strain and crack initiation. In thick lamellae, once cracks occur, they rapidly extend through coarse colonies or along boundaries, leading to macro scale failures [
39].
Compared with the cast Ti-48Al-3Nb-1.5Ta alloy, whose fracture strain reaches 1.7% by five-cycle heat treatment [
13] or 1.0% by multi-step heat treatments [
14], the SS-PREP&HIP Ti-48Al-3Nb-1.5Ta alloy can achieve similar plasticity at room temperature by a simple heat treatment, meeting the service requirements. The convenient and controllable heat treatment process is more conducive to engineering applications.
In high temperature tensile testing, the T6 alloy exhibits the highest strength and plasticity at 750 °C. Compared with different TiAl alloys, as illustrated in
Figure 17, the T6 alloy demonstrates good strength and outstanding plasticity at 750 °C, whose fracture strain is better than that of additive manufacturing TiAl4822 [
40], additive manufacturing TiAl4822-8Ta [
9], directionally solidification Ti-45Al-7Nb, Ti-45Al-8Nb [
41], and Ti-47Al-2Cr-2Nb [
42] alloys. As illustrated in
Figure 13, the fracture morphology at 750 °C tensile exhibits dimples, but the fracture morphology at 650 °C is primarily cleavage, indicating that the tough-brittle transition temperature is between 650 and 750 °C. In the tensile test conducted at 650 °C, the fracture occurs on the lamellar plane, as depicted by the fracture morphologies presented in
Figure 13a,b. The slip deformation encounters significant difficulty in traversing the lamellae (owing to the hard orientation). During the tensile test at 750 °C, with the transition from brittle fracture to tough fracture, the dislocation climbing in the γ phase and α
2 phase introduces an additional deformation mechanism. This mechanism effectively alleviates the plastic incoordination between the two phases. Correspondingly, the fracture surface exhibits a substantial number of dimples, as demonstrated in
Figure 13c,d.