Next Article in Journal
Trade-Off for CFRP Quality Using High-Frequency Ultrasonic-Assisted Drilling Under Lubricant Absence
Previous Article in Journal
Experimental Investigation on Cutting Forces in Sustainable Hard Milling of Hardox 500 Steel Under Al2O3/MoS2 Hybrid Nanofluid MQCL Environment
Previous Article in Special Issue
Engine Lubricant Impact in Light-Vehicle Fuel Economy: A Combined Numerical Simulation and Experimental Validation
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Use of Advanced Piston Ring Coatings on Agricultural Engines

1
Zhejiang Xinchai Co., Ltd., 888 Xinchang Avenue, Xinchang 312500, China
2
Polytechnic School, Mechanical Engineering, University of São Paulo, Sao Paulo 05508-010, Brazil
3
Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Lublin University of Technology, 20-618 Lublin, Poland
4
English Department, Yifu School, 218 Changning Road, Shenzhou 312400, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Lubricants 2025, 13(6), 239; https://doi.org/10.3390/lubricants13060239
Submission received: 16 April 2025 / Revised: 12 May 2025 / Accepted: 23 May 2025 / Published: 26 May 2025

Abstract

The use of combustion engines on agricultural vehicles will persist much longer than on-road vehicles. Introducing new technologies in agricultural engines is crucial to mitigating emissions while accounting for customer cost-sensitivity, harsh operation conditions, and typically sub-optimal maintenance. This work describes the use of CrN and tetrahedral amorphous carbon (ta-C) DLC-coated rings in small agricultural diesel engines. Compared with the gas nitride rings, the CrN and the ta-C DLC coatings exhibited, respectively, 74% and 86% lower wear in rig tests. The DLC also presented a very low coefficient of friction and high resistance to scuffing. A similar wear trend was observed on durability engine tests, where the CrN top ring showed an 80% lower wear rate than the GNS used in a similar engine. Wear on the DLC oil ring was below the measurement capability. Liner radial wear was measured on the piston ring reversal points in four angular positions, and except for one position, was lower than 3 µm. At the end of the test, engine performance and emissions are nearly identical to those at the test’s start, demonstrating that the use of advanced tribological solutions can significantly contribute to emissions mitigation in agricultural engines.

1. Introduction

The agricultural sector accounts for a substantial amount of diesel consumption, and hence CO2 emissions, reaching 118 Mtoe diesel in 2022 [1]. This figure is expected to rise, particularly in emerging and large-population countries [2]. China, as the world’s largest emitter of CO2, sees increasing emissions from its agricultural sector [3,4]. According to the China Mobile Source Environmental Management Annual Report 2021 [5] apud [6], non-road vehicles emitted 425,000 tons of hydrocarbon (HC), 4,782,000 tons of nitrogen oxides (NOx), and 237,000 tons of particle matter (PM) in 2020, accounting for 48%, 35%, and 39% of the total emissions, respectively.
Tractors are among the most fuel-consuming and polluting machines in agriculture [7]. They are used in various agricultural operations: plowing, soil tillage, pushing harvesting equipment, and others. Internal combustion engines will likely remain in use for a long time: however, maintenance and operation are often suboptimal, especially on small farms, where the engines are exposed to dust, fibers, etc. Robustness and low operation costs are essential for market acceptance and user satisfaction. While new engine technologies can reduce fuel consumption and emissions, they must be cost-effective. The introduction of new, improved, and efficient machinery can mitigate the environmental impact of agricultural mechanization, particularly in developing countries [8,9]. In some cases, the purchase of modern machinery increases fuel consumption more than the increase in productivity [10] showing that reducing fuel consumption is necessary. On the other hand, studies show that CO2 can be mitigated with the introduction of new technologies and that increasing energy efficiency is a more effective means to reduce CO2 emissions than changes in the fuel mix [11].
Until recently, CrN applied by PVD (Physical Vapor Deposition) and DLC (Diamond-Like Carbon) low-friction rings were applied only to more advanced, larger HDD engines. More rigorous emission regulations for non-road vehicles, the increasing use of alternative fuels, and market competitiveness are promoting the use of more advanced technologies on agricultural engines [12].
Friction losses account for one-third of automotive fuel consumption [13,14,15]. Reducing these losses can enhance energy efficiency. The piston rings and piston account for around 50% of the engine friction losses [13,16,17] and, being a reciprocating system with variable loads and temperatures, they experience both boundary/mixed and hydrodynamic lubrication regimes [17,18,19]. The main research paths on vehicle powertrain to friction reduction include [20]:
- Use of materials/coatings with a low friction coefficient.
- Surface finish and/or texturing, especially via optimization using computer models and detailed topographic characterizations.
- Use of low-viscosity oils and improved friction modifier additives.
The increased operational demands on piston rings caused by biofuel use [21], along with low-viscosity oils, increase the need for better tribological solutions such as coatings and improved surface finishes. On diesel engines, it is still common to use Chromium coatings. For agricultural diesel and two-stroke gasoline engines, it is also common to use gas-nitrided rings (GNS) in combination with chromed-coated liners. More modern HDD piston rings have CrN- or DLC-coated rings [22,23,24,25].
There are several variants of DLCs, and their tribological performances depend on their structure, surface finish, and lubricant additives [26,27,28]. For piston ring coatings, variants range from relatively soft hydrogenated DLCs, used for break-in [23,29], to very hard ta-C (tetrahedral amorphous Carbon) [24,25]. Recent optimizations for DLC coating processes have allowed the mass production of ta-C coatings thicker than 20 µm [30,31,32]. Some studies indicate that H-free coated rings against cast iron cylinder iron may benefit from biofuels [28]. Figure 1 and Figure 2 show the relative wear and friction of ring coatings in a reciprocating test.
The piston rings operate in a complex, transient tribological environment. Due to different transient gas pressures and temperatures, the rings face boundaries to hydrodynamic lubricant regimes. The top ring, closer to the combustion chamber, usually presents the highest wear rate. The use of lower-viscosity oils, one of the main paths to increase engine mechanical efficiency [17,18,20,34,35,36,37,38,39], tends to cause more boundary contact [18,36,37] and increase ring wear. Figure 3 shows the wear rate after 500 h tests. The use of a lower-viscosity oil (10W-30) caused a significant increase in wear; for example, 62% for the top ring. The use of ta-C DLC on the 10W-30 test returned the wear rate to a lower value.
From the cylinder-liner perspective, improving the honing surface finish is the primary method for reducing friction and wear [20,39,40,41,42,43,44,45]. Cylinder honing is typically characterized by the Abbot curve, which defines the reduced peak height (Rpk), core height (Rk), and valley depth (Rvk). Figure 4 shows the typical values of the three most common cylinder honing approaches: standard (almost obsolete nowadays), plateau, and side honing. Slide honing, also called “glide honing”, has lower peaks (Spk + Sk/2) to reduce boundary contact but also has shallower valleys to reduce oil consumption. Figure 5 shows the oil film thickness along the four strokes of an HDD at part load and the resultant contact area and oil volume for plateau and slide honing. The smoother slide honing has a much lower contact area, especially at the TDC (top dead center). The shallow valleys of slide honing also contain less oil, helping to reduce oil consumption and emissions.
Soderfjall (2017) [40] studied the effects of different honing techniques, DLC-coated rings, and low-tangential-load OCRs on engine friction. Smoother plateau surface cylinder liner surfaces presented lower friction compared to the standard honed surface. The use of DLC-coated rings and TLOCR with a low tangential load (one of the combinations) showed an almost 50% OCR friction reduction while still indicating a small difference in oil supplied to the top compression rings. Tas [28] investigated the use of DLC rings against mirror-like cylinders and concluded that the low wear and high scuffing resistance were improved by the formation of tribofilms in the cast iron. Ferreira [47] and Liu [48] showed the importance of a good surface finish on DLC rings to reduce wear. However, despite the advances in material and coating characterization, as well as in wear simulation and durability prediction [17,19,34,35,49,50,51,52,53,54,55,56], actual engine tests are still needed to validate new technologies.
In this work, the use of the more advanced CrN and ta-C DLC ring coatings is investigated through tribological rig tests and engine durability tests on a small agricultural diesel engine. The ring and liner wear are compared with a previous engine version using GNS rings and chromed-coated liners. Some additional potential improvements, allowed by the very low wear, are discussed to reduce friction and fuel consumption.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Rig Tribological Tests

Friction, wear, and scuffing tests were performed in an in-house-built reciprocating test using piston ring specimens (Figure 6). CoF was defined as the cycle average. For scuffing, the liner was lubricated with a few oil drops, and the test duration was a minimum of 3 h or when CoF reached 0.3. Time to scuffing was defined as the minimum of three replications.

2.2. Engine Tests

Two agricultural diesel engines were used. Table 1 gives the main engine characteristics. Notice that the new engine, where the advanced piston ring coatings were tested, has 21% higher specific power. Both engines are marketed to small tractors and harvest machinery like the one shown in Figure 7. Similar small-power diesel engines are used in developing countries for irrigation, pumping, and other agricultural activities.
The main characteristics of the piston rings are described in Table 2 and Table 3.
Figure 8, Figure 9, Figure 10 and Figure 11 and Table 4 show more details about the investigated ring coatings. The more wear-resistant CrN and DLC coatings were applied only to the running face over a nitriding face. The nitriding layer worked to protect the ring side faces and, in less demanding cases, acted as the wear-resistant surface treatment in the running face, as the engine in production used as a reference. An adhesion layer, usually chrome and around 1 µm thick, was used to promote good adhesion between the CrN and DLC coatings with the base material. Both the CrN and the ta-C DLC were deposited by Physical Vapor Deposition (PVD), also known as Ion Plating (IP). Process details are out of the scope of this paper, but for ta-C DLC, a filtered cathodic vacuum arc (FCVA) was used to ensure a good coating quality and a reduced number of pores and droplets. Details about FCVA can be found in [57,58].
Table 5 describes the cylinder liner’s main roughness parameters. Figure 12 shows the topography measured by the Taylor-Hobson CCI-MP optical profilometer, and measurements were carried out using a 20X lens. Roughness parameters were calculated by the equipment software, TalyMap Gold 6.2.6613.
To simulate field operation conditions, the dynamometer test was conducted as follows:
(a)
0 to 300 h: full power.
(b)
300 to 800 h: full power.
(c)
800 to 1100 h: thermal shock, alternating every 6 min at full power with 95 °C cooling water and 4 min at idle with 30 °C cooling water.
The prototype fuel injector caused excessive piston carbon buildup. An improved fuel injector and new pistons, cylinder liners, and piston rings were assembled. Lubricant oil was changed every 300 h.

3. Results

3.1. Rig Tribological Tests

Figure 13 compares the friction and wear of the different ring coatings versus the cast-iron liner. The GNS ring has the same nitriding treatment but no CrN PVD overcoating (see Figure 8).
Figure 14 shows the scuffing resistance of chrome, CrN, and ta-DLC coatings with oils equivalent to SAE 40 (HTHS (high-temperature high-shear): 3.5 mPa.s) and SAE 30 (HTHS 2.9 mPa.s). Under the test conditions, the use of lower-viscosity oils decreased the scuffing resistance for both chrome and CrN coatings, while the DLC concluded the 250 min tests without scuffing. Similar trends were reported by [25].

3.2. Engine Performance

Engine performance remained almost constant throughout the test (see Figure 15, Figure 16 and Figure 17). Before the thermal shock, the engine had its calibration fine-tuned and underwent minor maintenance. The two values at 800 h show the values before and after the minor maintenance. Only maximum blow-by showed some increase along the abused thermal shock.
Due to very low wear and engine degradation, emissions at the test end were similar to those at the test start (see Figure 18 and Figure 19).

3.3. Ring Wear

Ring radial wear was measured by superimposing the face profile before and after the test. On the GNS top ring, tested for 1000 h, the wear at ring tips was 6.5 µm. On the CrN, with an accumulated 800 h, wear was less than 2 µm (see Figure 20).
The second ring, not directly exposed to the combustion pressure and temperature, is the lowest tribologically loaded. Being only phosphate-coated, the second ring presented larger radial wear, between 8 and 10 µm (see Figure 21). Figure 22 shows the wear rate of the different rings. The wear rate of the second ring was very similar in both engines.
Due to the almost flat running profile, the direct measurement of wear on the oil control rings was not possible. The DLC oil control rings were measured in five angular positions in the upper and lower lands (see Figure 23). Very low wear was evidenced by the fact that the minimum land height in all measured positions was 24 µm. The land height has dimensions similar to the DLC thickness (see Figure 11).

3.4. Cylinder Liner Wear

As shown in Figure 13, PVD and DLC ring coatings are highly wear-resistant and cause lower wear on the cylinder liner. While the engine production uses chrome-coated liners, the one in development uses uncoated liners. The use of smoother slide honing also contributes to low liner wear. Unfortunately, during the development of the new engine, liners of the 1000 h test in the production engine were not found to be measured. For the development engine, as mentioned for the rings, measurements were made at the end of the test, with rings and liners having accumulated 800 test hours. Liner honing was well preserved with no significant polishing or wear scratches. Honing grooves are visible even at the TDC (see Figure 24).
Liner radial wear was measured on the piston ring reversal points top dead center (TDC) and bottom dead center (BDC) in four angular positions (front, thrust side, back, and anti-thrust side) by a profilometer, see example in Figure 25 and except for one position, all values were below 4 µm (see Figure 26 and Figure 27).

4. Discussion

This paper was offered to the Lubricants Special Issue “Tackling Emissions from the Internal Combustion Engine: Advances in Piston/Bore Tribology”, for which one of the authors is co-editor. In the special edition, more detailed and rigorous investigations are described. The Special Edition articles covered themes from very detailed computer models [59,60,61], fuel consumption on emission tests, and the associated experimentation uncertainties [39,62] to long real-world vehicle tests using low-viscosity oils [63]. Stellljess [64] showed a reduction in friction losses from 9% to 17.3% with the use of a profiled cylinder bore.
Technology advances need to be implemented in mass production products in order to generate the expected benefits to society. In the current work, we have tried to demonstrate the benefits of some advanced ring coatings on small agricultural diesel engines produced for emerging countries. Compared with the GNS rings tested in a similar engine already in production, the CrN top ring presented a wear rate five times lower. The ta-C oil ring presented wear below measurable capabilities. Despite a direct comparison not being possible since the engines and liners were different, the engine wear results correlated well with the rig tribological tests.
The very low wear found in the piston rings and liners creates opportunities for further improvements to reduce friction and fuel consumption:
  • The use of lower-viscosity oils: lower oil film thickness and higher boundary contact would be acceptable.
  • Smoother cylinder liners: honing grooves were preserved at the end of the test.
  • Reduced tangential load on oil control ring tangential: contact pressure was not reduced along the engine life due to ring face wear.

5. Conclusions

CrN PVD top rings and ta-C DLC oil control rings showed very low wear after the 800 h engine test. In combination with the ring coatings, the use of smoother slide honing on the cylinder also caused very low wear on the cylinder. Cylinder wear was measured by radial profiles at TDC and BDC, and it is in the order of 3 µm. No polishing or scratch marks were observed even in the ring reverse regions.
Except for the blow-by increase in the final hours of thermal shock, all engine parameters remain almost unchanged throughout the test. At test end, engine performance and emissions are almost identical to those at test start. This brings us to the conclusion that the integration of advanced piston ring coatings and optimized cylinder liner surfaces significantly reduces wear in agricultural diesel engines. The results from the reliability test indicate that these technological advancements not only maintain engine performance but also contribute to lower emissions, supporting sustainability in the agricultural sector.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, E.T.; methodology, X.H. and B.L.; validation, X.H., B.L. and E.T.; formal analysis, A.O. and G.K.; investigation, X.H., B.L. and E.T.; writing—original draft preparation, E.T.; writing—review and editing, X.H., B.L., A.O., G.K. and E.T.; project administration, X.H. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Data Availability Statement

Liner topography measurement reports and the respective measurement files are available under reasonable request. The influence of topography waviness, usually filtered on roughness measurements, will be investigated in a future paper.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to express gratitude and appreciation for the ATG R&D team for the rig tribological tests.

Conflicts of Interest

Xiaochao He Bang Liu, Eduardo Tomanik are employed Zhejiang Xinchai Co., Ltd. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

References

  1. Venkatachalam, V. Oil and Gas in the Agriculture Sector. Research Canadian Energy Centre. 2024. Available online: https://www.canadianenergycentre.ca/energy-perspectives-oil-and-gas-in-the-agriculture-sector (accessed on 11 April 2025).
  2. Ali, M. Impact assessment of energy utilization in agriculture for India and Pakistan. Sci. Total Environ. 2019, 648, 1520–1526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Xu, B.; Lin, B. Factors affecting CO2 emissions in China’s agriculture sector: Evidence from geographically weighted regression model. Energy Policy 2017, 104, 404–414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Lin, B.; Xu, B. Factors affecting CO2 emissions in China’s agriculture sector: A quantile regression. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2018, 94, 15–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. MEE. China Mobile Source Environmental Management Annual Report 2021; MEE: Beijing, China, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  6. Hou, X.; Zhang, X.; Huang, S.; Xu, P.; Shen, J. Measurement of engine performance and maps-based emission prediction of agricultural tractors under actual operating conditions. Measurement 2023, 222, 113637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Janulevičius, A.; Juostas, A.; Pupinis, G. Engine performance during tractor operational period. Energy Convers. Manag. 2013, 68, 11–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Special Agriculture 4.0. Centro de Ciências Agrárias—Universidade Federal do Ceará, Fortaleza, CE. Available online: www.ccarevista.ufc.br (accessed on 1 April 2025). [CrossRef]
  9. Raza, M.Y.; Zhongpan, Q.; Pengju, W. Agriculture-related energy consumption, food policy, and CO2 emission reduction: New insights from Pakistan. Front. Environ. Sci. 2023, 10, 1099813. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Kubon, M.; Cupiał, M.; Szeląg-Sikora, A.; Kobuszewski, M. The Impact of Purchasing New Agricultural Machinery on Fuel Consumption on Farms. Sustainability 2024, 16, 52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Li, T.; Baležentis, T.; Makutėnienė, D.; Streimikiene, D.; Kriščiukaitienė, I. Energy-related CO2 emission in European Union agriculture: Driving forces and possibilities for reduction. Appl. Energy 2016, 180, 682–694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Ji, Q.; Wang, Z.; Zhao, W.; Zhou, Y.; Wang, X.; Liu, J. Effects of ammonia energy fraction on combustion stability, carbon-based emissions and greenhouse effect of an agricultural ammonia-diesel dual-fuel engine. Process Saf. Environ. Prot. 2025, 198, 107107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Holmberg, K.; Andersson, P.; Erdemir, A. Global Energy Consumption Due to Friction in Passenger Cars. Tribol. Int. 2012, 47, 221–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Holmberg, K.; Andersson, P.; Nylund, N.-O.; Mäkelä, K.; Erdemir, A. Global energy consumption due to friction in trucks and buses. Tribol. Int. 2014, 78, 94–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Tung, S.C.; McMillan, M.L. Automotive tribology overview of current advances and challenges for the future. Tribol. Int. 2004, 37, 517–536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Schommers, J.; Scheib, H.; Hartweg, M.; Bosler, A. Minimising Friction in Combustion Engines. MTZ Worldw. 2013, 74, 28–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Zhmud, B.; Tomanik, E.; Jiménez, A.J.; Profito, F.; Tormos, B. Powertrain Friction Reduction by Synergistic Optimization of Cylinder Bore Surface and Lubricant—Part 2: Engine Tribology Simulations and Tests; SAE Technical Paper; SAE International: Warrendale, PA, USA, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  18. Taylor, R.; Morgan, N.; Mainwaring, R.; Davenport, T. How much mixed/boundary friction is there in an engine—And where is it? Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part J J. Eng. Tribol. 2020, 234, 1563–1579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Tomanik, E.; Profito, F.J.; Tormos, B.; Jiménez, A.J.; Zhmud, B. Powertrain Friction Reduction by Synergistic Optimization of the Cylinder Bore Surface and Lubricant Part 1: Basic Modelling; SAE Technical Paper; SAE International: Warrendale, PA, USA, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  20. Wong, V.W.; Tung, S.C. Overview of automotive engine friction and reduction trends–Effects of surface, material, and lubricant-additive technologies. Friction 2016, 4, 1–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Suthisripok, T.; Semsamran, P. The impact of biodiesel B100 on a small agricultural diesel engine. Tribol. Int. 2018, 128, 397–409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Araujo, J.A.; Banfield, R.R. DLC as a Low-Friction Coating for Engine Components; SAE Technical Paper; SAE International: Warrendale, PA, USA, 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Higuchi, T.; Mabuchi, Y.; Ichihara, H.; Murata, T.; Moronuki, M. Development of Hydrogen-Free Diamond-Like Carbon Coating for Piston Rings. Tribol. Online Jpn. Soc. Tribol. 2017, 12, 117–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Bruno, R.; Rabello, R.; Silva, D.; Araujo, J. DLC Coated Ring Pack for Heavy Duty Diesel Engines; SIMEA 2017 Proceedings Ed.; Blucher: Vildbjerg, Denmark, 2017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Björling, M.; Isaksson, P.; Marklund, P.; Larsson, R. The Influence of DLC Coating on EHL Friction Coefficient. Tribol. Lett. 2012, 47, 285–294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Rübig, B.; Heim, D.; Forsich, C.; Dipolt, C.; Mueller, T.; Gebeshuber, A.; Kullmer, R.; Holecek, R.; Lugmair, C.; Krawinkler, M.; et al. Tribological behavior of thick DLC coatings under lubricated conditions. Surf. Coat. Technol. 2017, 314, 13–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Tas, M.; Banerji, M.; Lukitsch, M.; Alpas, A. Roles of mirror-like surface finish and DLC coated piston rings on increasing scuffing resistance of cast iron cylinder liners. Wear 2017, 376–377, 1558–1569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Mobarak, H.; Masjuki, H.; Mohamad, E.N.; Rahman, S.A.; Al Mahmud, K.; Habibullah, M.; Salauddin, S. Effect of DLC coating on tribological behavior of cylinder liner piston ring material combination when lubricated with Jatropha oil. Procedia Eng. 2014, 90, 733–739. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Mazuco, F.; Rezende, L.; Araujo, J.; Pereira, J.; Souza, R. Parameters study of carbon bombardment step for enhanced adhesion of thick DLC coating deposited by cathodic arc evaporation. Surf. Coat. Technol. 2023, 457, 129310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Mazuco, F.; Araujo, J.; Souza, R. Effect of long carbon bombardment step on the adhesion of thick amorphous carbon coating deposited by cathodic arc evaporation. Diam. Relat. Mater. 2021, 116, 108434. Available online: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925963521001977 (accessed on 25 February 2025). [CrossRef]
  31. Banerji, A.; Lukitsch, M.; Alpas, A. Friction reduction mechanisms in cast iron sliding against DLC: Effect of biofuel (E85) diluted engine oil. Wear 2016, 368–369, 196–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Ferrarese, A.; Banfield, R.; Tomanik, E. High Value PVD Top Ring for High Speed Diesel Engines; SAE Technical Paper; SAE International: Warrendale, PA, USA, 2008. [Google Scholar]
  33. Zavos, A. Effect of Coating and Low Viscosity Oils on Piston Ring Friction under Mixed Regime of Lubrication through Analytical Modelling. Lubricants 2021, 9, 124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Zavos, A.; Katsaros, K.P.; Nikolakopoulos, P.G. Optimum Selection of Coated Piston Rings and Thrust Bearings in Mixed Lubrication for Different Lubricants Using Machine Learning. Coatings 2022, 12, 704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Rejowski, E.; Tomanik, E.; Souza, J. Low viscosity oils impact on heavy duty diesel engine components. In Anais do XXIV Simpósio Internacional de Engenharia Automotica—SIMEA 2016 [Blucher Engineering Proceedings]; Blucher: São Paulo, Brazil, 2016; pp. 118–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Tomanik, E.; Profito, F.; Sheets, B.; Souza, R. Combined lubricant–surface system approach for potential passenger car CO2 reduction on piston-ring-cylinder bore assembly. Tribol. Int. 2020, 149, 105514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Tormos, B.; Jiménez, A.J.; Fang, T.; Mainwaring, R.; Lizarraga-Garcia, E. Numerical assessment of tribological performance of different low viscosity engine oils in a 4-stroke CI light-duty ICE. SAE Int. J. Adv. Cur. Pract. Mob. 2022, 4, 1524–1536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Rovai, F.F.; Sartori, E.; Crepaldi, J.; Rajala, S. Engine Lubricant Impact in Light-Vehicle Fuel Economy: A Combined Numerical Simulation and Experimental Validation. Lubricants 2025, 13, 137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Robota, A.; Zwein, F. Influence of cylinder bore topography on the oil consumption and particulate emissions of a DI TCI diesel engine. MTZ 1999, 60, 1999. [Google Scholar]
  40. Soderfjall, M.; Herbst, H.; Larsson, R.; Almqvist, A. Influence on friction from piston ring design, cylinder liner roughness and lubricant Properties. Tribol. Int. 2017, 116, 272–284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Obert, P.; Müller, T.; Füßer, H.; Bartel, D. The influence of oil supply and cylinder liner temperature on friction, wear and scuffing behavior of piston ring cylinder liner contacts—A new model test. In Tribology International—Amsterdam; Elsevier Science: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2016; Volume 94, pp. 306–314. [Google Scholar]
  42. Dimkovski, Z.; Cabanettes, F.; Löfgren, H.; Anderberg, C.; Ohlsson, R.; Rosén, B.G. Optimization of cylinder liner surface finish by slide honing. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part B 2012, 226, 575–584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Li, Y.; Chen, H.; Tian, T. A Deterministic Model for Lubricant Transport Within Complex Geometry Under Sliding Contact and Its Application in the Interaction Between the Oil Control Ring and Rough Liner in Internal Combustion Engines; SAE International: Warrendale, PA, USA, 2008. [Google Scholar]
  44. Chen, H.; Li, Y.; Tian, T. A Novel Approach to Model the Lubrication and Friction Between the Twin-Land Oil Control Ring and Liner with Consideration of Micro Structure of the Liner Surface Finish in Internal Combustion Engines; SAE Technical Paper; SAE International: Warrendale, PA, USA, 2008. [Google Scholar]
  45. Tomanik, E. Friction and wear bench tests of different engine liner surface finishes. Tribol. Int. 2008, 41, 1032–1038. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Spencer, A.; Avan, E.Y.; Almqvist, A.; Dwyer-Joyce, R.S.; Larsson, R. An experimental and numerical investigation of frictional losses and film thickness for four cylinder liner variants for a heavy duty diesel engine. Proc. Inst. Mec. Eng. Part J J. Eng. Tribol. 2013, 227, 1319–1333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Ferreira, R.; Almeida, R.; Carvalho, O.; Sobral, L.; Carvalho, S.; Silva, F. Influence of a DLC coating topography in the piston ring/cylinder liner tribological performance. J. Manuf. Process. 2021, 66, 483–493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Liu, J.; Zhang, Y.; Liao, B. A review on preparation process and tribological performance of coatings for internal combustion engine piston ring. Adv. Mech. Eng. 2023, 15, 1–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Tomanik, E.; Nigro, F. Piston Ring Pack and Cylinder Wear Modelling; SAE TRANS PAPER 2001; SAE International: Warrendale, PA, USA, 2001. [Google Scholar]
  50. Corral, I.; Calvet, J.; Salcedo, M. Use of roughness probability parameters to quantify the material removed in plateau-honing. Int. J. Mach. Tools Manuf. 2010, 50, 621–629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Gu, C.; Wang, R.; Tian, T. Modeling the Fatigue Wear of the Cylinder Liner in Internal Combustion Engines during the Break-In Period and Its Impact on Piston Ring Lubrication. Lubricants 2019, 7, 89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Ma, Z.; Henein, N.A.; Bryzik, W. A model for wear and friction in cylinder liners and piston rings. Tribol. Trans. 2006, 49, 315–327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Giorgio, M.; Guida, M.; Pulcini, G. A state-dependent wear model with an application to marine engine cylinder liners. Technometrics 2010, 52, 172–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Mezghani, S.; Demirci, I.; Yousfi, M.; El Mansori, M. Running-in wear modeling of honed surface for combustion engine cylinder liners. Wear 2013, 302, 1360–1369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Koszalka, G.; Niewczas, A.; Guzik, M. Predicted and Actual Effect of Cylinder Liner Wear on the Blowby in a Truck Diesel Engine; SAE Technical Paper; SAE International: Warrendale, PA, USA, 2008. [Google Scholar]
  56. Lubrecht, T.; Biboulet, N.; Dufils, J.; Lubrecht, A.A. Piston Ring Mixed Lubrication Model Including Real Geometry Using Analytical Correction Coefficients: Theory and Experimental Validation. Tribol. Lett. 2023, 71, 73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Sheeja, D.; Tay, B.; Lau, S.; Shi, X.; Ding, X. Structural and tribological characterization of multilayer ta-C films prepared by filtered cathodic vacuum arc with substrate pulse biasing. Surf. Coat. Technol. 2000, 132, 228–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Lee, W.-Y.; Jang, Y.-J.; Tokoroyama, T.; Murashima, M.; Umehara, N. Effect of defects on wear behavior in ta-C coating prepared by filtered cathodic vacuum arc deposition. Diam. Relat. Mater. 2020, 105, 107789. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Dellis, P. Comparative Research in the Field of the Parametric Effect of Lubricant Cavitation Initiation and Development on Friction and Wear in Piston Ring and Cylinder Liner Assemblies. Lubricants 2024, 12, 460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Yang, T.-Y.; Li, M.; Tian, T. Modeling Inertia-Driven Oil Transport Inside the Three-Piece Oil Control Ring of Internal Combustion Engines. Lubricants 2024, 12, 394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Li, M.; Tian, T. Sources and Destinations of Oil Leakage through TPOCR Based on 2D-LIF Observation and Modeling Analysis. Lubricants 2023, 11, 522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Rovai, F.F.; Tomanik, E. Lubricant Viscosity Impact in Fuel Economy: Experimental Uncertainties Compensation. Lubricants 2025, 13, 49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Shao, H.; Hu, H.; Luo, Y.; Hua, L.; Pan, J.; Zhu, G.; Jiao, Y.; Yan, J.; Wei, G. Impact of Mid-to-Low-Ash, Low-Viscosity Lubricants on Aftertreatment Systems after 210,000-Kilometer Real-World Road Endurance Trials. Lubricants 2024, 12, 240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Stelljes, F.; Pohlmann-Tasche, F.; Dinkelacker, F. Experimental Investigation of a Free-Form Honed Cylinder Liner for Heavy-Duty Engines. Lubricants 2024, 12, 132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Relative ring coating wear. Adapted from [23,25,33].
Figure 1. Relative ring coating wear. Adapted from [23,25,33].
Lubricants 13 00239 g001
Figure 2. Relative coefficient of friction. Reciprocating tests, 450 N, 30 mm stroke, Ester oil, 190 °C. Adapted from [22].
Figure 2. Relative coefficient of friction. Reciprocating tests, 450 N, 30 mm stroke, Ester oil, 190 °C. Adapted from [22].
Lubricants 13 00239 g002
Figure 3. Ring wear rates after a 500 h test in HDD tests with two oil viscosities. Adapted from [36].
Figure 3. Ring wear rates after a 500 h test in HDD tests with two oil viscosities. Adapted from [36].
Lubricants 13 00239 g003
Figure 4. Scheme of the Abbott curve and the Rk roughness parameters. (a) Plateau and Slide honing topographies and their respective; (b) Typical honing values of cylinder liners.
Figure 4. Scheme of the Abbott curve and the Rk roughness parameters. (a) Plateau and Slide honing topographies and their respective; (b) Typical honing values of cylinder liners.
Lubricants 13 00239 g004
Figure 5. Calculated oil film thickness and area of contact, as well as oil volume along the engine’s four strokes. Reproduced with permission from [46].
Figure 5. Calculated oil film thickness and area of contact, as well as oil volume along the engine’s four strokes. Reproduced with permission from [46].
Lubricants 13 00239 g005
Figure 6. Scheme of the reciprocating rig test.
Figure 6. Scheme of the reciprocating rig test.
Lubricants 13 00239 g006
Figure 7. Small agricultural tractors similar to the ones that will use the engine.
Figure 7. Small agricultural tractors similar to the ones that will use the engine.
Lubricants 13 00239 g007
Figure 8. Ring cross-section scheme.
Figure 8. Ring cross-section scheme.
Lubricants 13 00239 g008
Figure 9. (a) PVD CrN ring cross-section. (b) SEM photo.
Figure 9. (a) PVD CrN ring cross-section. (b) SEM photo.
Lubricants 13 00239 g009
Figure 10. ta-C DLC coating, cross-section.
Figure 10. ta-C DLC coating, cross-section.
Lubricants 13 00239 g010
Figure 11. Oil control ring: (a) “LKZ®” profile; (b) cross-section showing the DLC coating.
Figure 11. Oil control ring: (a) “LKZ®” profile; (b) cross-section showing the DLC coating.
Lubricants 13 00239 g011
Figure 12. Topography of cylinder liner (a,b): production engine, chrome-coated. (c,d) Under-development engine, cast iron.
Figure 12. Topography of cylinder liner (a,b): production engine, chrome-coated. (c,d) Under-development engine, cast iron.
Lubricants 13 00239 g012
Figure 13. Tribological test results of ring coatings. (a) Friction. (b) Wear. GNS: gas-nitrided steel, CKS: chrome ceramic.
Figure 13. Tribological test results of ring coatings. (a) Friction. (b) Wear. GNS: gas-nitrided steel, CKS: chrome ceramic.
Lubricants 13 00239 g013
Figure 14. Time to scuffing in the rig test with oils of different viscosities. (a) CoF along the test. (b) Time to scuffing.
Figure 14. Time to scuffing in the rig test with oils of different viscosities. (a) CoF along the test. (b) Time to scuffing.
Lubricants 13 00239 g014
Figure 15. Maximum power during the test.
Figure 15. Maximum power during the test.
Lubricants 13 00239 g015
Figure 16. Brake-specific fuel consumption at full load during the test.
Figure 16. Brake-specific fuel consumption at full load during the test.
Lubricants 13 00239 g016
Figure 17. Maximum blow-by during the test.
Figure 17. Maximum blow-by during the test.
Lubricants 13 00239 g017
Figure 18. Exhaust smoke during the test: (a) at 2400 rpm, maximum power; (b) at 1700 rpm, maximum torque.
Figure 18. Exhaust smoke during the test: (a) at 2400 rpm, maximum power; (b) at 1700 rpm, maximum torque.
Lubricants 13 00239 g018
Figure 19. NOx during the test: (a) at 2400 rpm, maximum power; (b) at 1700 rpm, maximum torque.
Figure 19. NOx during the test: (a) at 2400 rpm, maximum power; (b) at 1700 rpm, maximum torque.
Lubricants 13 00239 g019
Figure 20. Top ring, running face profile after tests. (a) GNS ring tested in the production engine (b) CrN ring tested in the development engine.
Figure 20. Top ring, running face profile after tests. (a) GNS ring tested in the production engine (b) CrN ring tested in the development engine.
Lubricants 13 00239 g020
Figure 21. Second ring, only phosphate-coated, running face profile after test. (a) production engine (b) development engine.
Figure 21. Second ring, only phosphate-coated, running face profile after test. (a) production engine (b) development engine.
Lubricants 13 00239 g021
Figure 22. Ring radial wear rate.
Figure 22. Ring radial wear rate.
Lubricants 13 00239 g022
Figure 23. Oil Control, running face profile after test: (a) upper land; (b) lower land.
Figure 23. Oil Control, running face profile after test: (a) upper land; (b) lower land.
Lubricants 13 00239 g023
Figure 24. Typical visual appearance of the cast-iron liner after 800 h test, TDC, TS. Honing marks still visible. Honing marks were still visible even at TDC.
Figure 24. Typical visual appearance of the cast-iron liner after 800 h test, TDC, TS. Honing marks still visible. Honing marks were still visible even at TDC.
Lubricants 13 00239 g024
Figure 25. Example of liner measurement: (a) 48 mm measurement length; (b) details of the maximum found wear.
Figure 25. Example of liner measurement: (a) 48 mm measurement length; (b) details of the maximum found wear.
Lubricants 13 00239 g025
Figure 26. Liner wear at top dead center (TDC).
Figure 26. Liner wear at top dead center (TDC).
Lubricants 13 00239 g026
Figure 27. Liner wear at bottom dead center (BDC).
Figure 27. Liner wear at bottom dead center (BDC).
Lubricants 13 00239 g027
Table 1. Main engine characteristics.
Table 1. Main engine characteristics.
ProductionNew
Displacement volume [L]3.53.6
Bore × stroke [mm]98 × 11598 × 120
Max. Power [kW]95 @ 2600 rpm118 @ 2400 rpm
Specific Power [kW/l]27.132.8
Max. Torque [Nm]450 @ 2000 rpm550 @ 1700–1800 rpm
CylinderChrome CoatedCast Iron
Lubricant20W-5020W-50
Table 2. Piston rings—engine in production.
Table 2. Piston rings—engine in production.
Top2ndOCR
CoatingNitridedPhosphateNitrided
materialSteelCast IronNodular Cast Iron
Axial width [mm]2.52.03.0
Radial [mm]3.803.63.5
typeKeystonetaper-faced2-piece
Tangential Force [N]19.614.530.0
Table 3. Piston rings—engine under development.
Table 3. Piston rings—engine under development.
Top2ndOCR
CoatingCrNPhosphateta-C, DLC
materialGNSCast ironNodular Cast Iron
Axial width [mm]223
Radial [mm]3.554.02.54
typeKeystonetaper-faced2-piece, “LKZ” profile
Tangential Force [N]15.115.941.8
Table 4. Piston ring coatings—main characteristics (as finished).
Table 4. Piston ring coatings—main characteristics (as finished).
GNSCrNta-C
Deposition methodGas NitridingPVD—Cathodic ArcFCVA
Hardness [Hv]900 min. at 10 µm1100 min.1700–3500
Thickness [µm], min.10010020
Roughness [µm], max.Rz 3.0Rz 1.6Rpk 0.2, Rk 0.6
Table 5. Cylinder liner material and roughness.
Table 5. Cylinder liner material and roughness.
ChromedCast Iron
Hardness, Hv800 min.400
Sa [µm]0.280.62
Spk [µm]0.210.19
Sk [µm]0.660.28
Svk [µm]0.772.62
Mr1 [%]5.47.4
Mr2 [%]81.372.6
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

He, X.; Liu, B.; Tomanik, E.; Koszalka, G.; Orlova, A. Use of Advanced Piston Ring Coatings on Agricultural Engines. Lubricants 2025, 13, 239. https://doi.org/10.3390/lubricants13060239

AMA Style

He X, Liu B, Tomanik E, Koszalka G, Orlova A. Use of Advanced Piston Ring Coatings on Agricultural Engines. Lubricants. 2025; 13(6):239. https://doi.org/10.3390/lubricants13060239

Chicago/Turabian Style

He, Xiaochao, Bang Liu, Eduardo Tomanik, Grzegorz Koszalka, and Anna Orlova. 2025. "Use of Advanced Piston Ring Coatings on Agricultural Engines" Lubricants 13, no. 6: 239. https://doi.org/10.3390/lubricants13060239

APA Style

He, X., Liu, B., Tomanik, E., Koszalka, G., & Orlova, A. (2025). Use of Advanced Piston Ring Coatings on Agricultural Engines. Lubricants, 13(6), 239. https://doi.org/10.3390/lubricants13060239

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop