Next Article in Journal
End-to-End Deep Learning Approach for Perfusion Data: A Proof-of-Concept Study to Classify Core Volume in Stroke CT
Previous Article in Journal
Clinical Evaluation of an Innovative Metal-Artifact-Reduction Algorithm in FD-CT Angiography in Cerebral Aneurysms Treated by Endovascular Coiling or Surgical Clipping
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Diagnostics
Volume 12
Issue 5
10.3390/diagnostics12051141
diagnostics-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Evaluation of a Multiplex Real-Time PCR Assay for Detecting Chlamydia trachomatis in Vaginal Samples

by
Carole Kebbi-Beghdadi
1,
Sebastien Aeby
1,
David Baud
2 and
Gilbert Greub
1,*
1
Institute of Microbiology, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, CH-1011 Lausanne, Switzerland
2
Materno-Fetal and Obstetrics Research Unit, Department Woman-Mother-Child, Lausanne University Hospital, CH-1011 Lausanne, Switzerland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Diagnostics 2022, 12(5), 1141; https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12051141
Submission received: 22 March 2022 / Revised: 14 April 2022 / Accepted: 19 April 2022 / Published: 4 May 2022
(This article belongs to the Section Diagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Disease)
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Chlamydia trachomatis is an important cause of sexually transmitted infections (STI) in Western countries. It is often asymptomatic, and thus, left untreated, and can have severe negative consequences, such as tubal infertility or adverse pregnancy outcomes. Other sexually transmitted microorganisms, such as Neisseria gonorrhoeae and Trichomonas vaginalis, as well as normal residents of the vaginal flora, such as genital mycoplasmas, also negatively impact human sexual and reproductive health. We evaluated the reliability of the Seegene Allplex STI Essential Assay for C. trachomatis detection using the real-time qPCR routinely used in our diagnostic laboratories as the gold standard. The Seegene assay displayed a sensitivity of 97.8% and a specificity of 98.9%. As this assay can also detect six other urogenital pathogens, we applied it to 404 samples from women who attended Lausanne University Maternity Hospital and obtained the following prevalence rates: 2.5% for C. trachomatis, 3.5% for Mycoplasma hominis, 6.3% for Ureaplasma urealyticum, and 27.7% for Ureaplasma parvum. Two samples were positive for Trichomonas vaginalis, and one sample was positive for Mycoplasma genitalium. Bacterial vaginosis was present in 4.5% of the cases and was strongly associated with M. hominis. Finally, we confirmed the association between C. trachomatis infection and pre-term birth (p = 0.03) but could not detect any association of this condition with other urogenital pathogens (Mycoplasma/Ureaplasma). In conclusion, given its high sensitivity and specificity for C. trachomatis DNA detection as well as its multiplex format, which simultaneously provides results for six other urogenital pathogens, the Seegene Allplex™ STI Essential Assay represents an appealing diagnostic tool in modern microbiology laboratories.

1. Introduction

Chlamydia trachomatis is the leading cause of sexually transmitted bacterial infections worldwide with over 127 million cases estimated in 2016, according to the most recent data from the World Health Organization (WHO) [1].
In symptomatic cases, C. trachomatis infection causes several urogenital syndromes, including urethritis, epididymitis, prostatitis, and cervicitis [2]. However, 70–80% of C. trachomatis infections in women and 50% in men are asymptomatic, which probably explains the relatively high incidence of this sexually transmitted infection (STI) even in Western countries with advanced medical systems and public health programs [1].
In some women, untreated C. trachomatis infections may ascend to the upper genital tract and become chronic, leading to long-term sequelae, such as pelvic inflammatory disease (PID), ectopic pregnancy, and tubal infertility (TFI), or inducing adverse pregnancy outcomes [2,3,4]. Infections are also associated with an increased risk of cervical cancer and HIV acquisition and transmission [5,6].
No effective vaccine against C. trachomatis has been developed so far, and routine screening of sexually active young women is currently the only method to prevent complications of asymptomatic infections [7].
Neisseria gonorrhoeae and Trichomonas vaginalis are also important sexually transmitted pathogens that negatively affect human sexual and reproductive health [8]. Finally, genital mycoplasmas, such as Mycoplasma genitalium, Mycoplasma hominis, Ureaplasma urealyticum, and Ureaplasma parvum, can be normal residents of the vaginal flora but have also been associated with adverse pregnancy outcomes, such as preterm labor and premature rupture of membranes [9,10,11,12]. Their role is complicated by the presence or absence of bacterial vaginosis [9].
All these urogenital microorganisms can be detected by Nucleic Acid Amplification Tests (NAATs), which display high sensitivity and high specificity and can be performed with non-invasive clinical samples, such as urine or vaginal swabs [13]. Furthermore, several companies have now developed multiplex real-time PCR assays that can detect multiple microorganisms in a single assay.
In this study, we evaluated the power of the Seegene Allplex™ STI Essential Assay, which can simultaneously detect C. trachomatis, N. gonorrhoeae, T. vaginalis, M. genitalium, M. hominis, U. urealyticum, and U. parvum, as a diagnostic tool. We first evaluated the reliability of this assay for C. trachomatis detection compared with the real-time qPCR routinely used in our diagnostic laboratories (used as the gold standard). Second, we used two Seegene assays to determine the prevalence of the seven microorganisms mentioned above and bacterial vaginosis in a cohort of 404 women who attended Lausanne University Maternity Hospital. Finally, to assess the role of these pathogens in pre-term birth (PTB), we compared their prevalence in a group of women who gave birth prematurely with that in women with uneventful term pregnancies.

2. Methods

2.1. Samples

Patient samples were collected at the obstetrical ward of Lausanne University Maternity Hospital during a previous study [14]. The complete cohort included 404 samples; however, different subsets of this cohort were used for the different analyses listed below.
  • To assess the reliability of the Seegene Allplex™ STI Essential Assay for the detection of C. trachomatis, we used 269 samples that were previously tested with the C. trachomatis-specific real-time PCR routinely used in our diagnostic laboratories [15]. Since among these 269 samples, only 1 was positive for C. trachomatis, 45 samples collected at Lausanne University Hospital between May and July 2021 and assigned as C. trachomatis-positive using this same PCR [15] were added to the group to improve our evaluation of the assay.
  • To calculate the prevalence of urogenital microorganisms and bacterial vaginosis, we used the complete cohort, i.e., 404 samples. The median age of the patients was 30 +/− 5.5.
  • To assess the association of urogenital microorganisms and bacterial vaginosis with pre-term birth, we analyzed 217 samples from women who attended a labor ward with uneventful term pregnancies and no history of miscarriages, stillbirths, or pre-term labor and 97 samples from women who spontaneously delivered before 37 weeks of gestation (PTB). The median age of the patients was 29 +/− 4.2 in the control group and 31 +/− 5.9 in the PTB group (p = 0.445).

2.2. DNA Extraction and Storage

DNA from the 404 samples of the cohort had been extracted, following the manufacturer’s instructions, with the QIAamp DNA Mini Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) at the time of the previous study [14] and had been kept frozen since then. DNA from the 45 more recent samples was extracted with the same kit.

2.3. Seegene Multiplex Real-Time PCRs

All samples from the cohort (n = 404) were tested using the multiplex real-time PCR Allplex™ STI Essential Assay (Seegene, Seoul, Korea), which can simultaneously detect C. trachomatis, N. gonorrhoeae, T. vaginalis, M. genitalium, M. hominis, U. urealyticum, and U. parvum in a single tube using dual priming oligonucleotide (DPO™) and multiple detection temperature (MuDT™) technologies. They were also tested with the Allplex™ Bacterial Vaginosis Assay (Seegene, Seoul, Korea), a multiplex real-time PCR assay that simultaneously detects 7 bacteria species associated with vaginosis (Atopobium vaginae, bacterial vaginosis-associated bacteria 2, Bacteroides fragilis, Gardnerella vaginalis, Lactobacillus spp., Megasphaera Type 1, and Mobiluncus spp.).
The 45 C. trachomatis-positive samples were only analyzed with the multiplex real-time PCR Allplex™ STI Essential Assay (Seegene, Seoul, Korea).

2.4. In House-Developed Real-Time qPCRs

A total of 269 samples from the cohort and 45 samples collected later (see above) were tested with a C. trachomatis-specific real-time qPCR targeting the C. trachomatis cryptic plasmid [15]. This qPCR, developed in-house, is routinely used in our diagnostic laboratories for C. trachomatis detection. It amplifies DNA during 45 cycles.
The 45 above-mentioned samples were also tested with a pan-Chlamydiales real-time qPCR that amplifies a region of the 16SrRNA gene conserved in all Chlamydiales bacteria [16]. This qPCR also amplifies DNA during 45 cycles.

2.5. Statistical Analyses

Patient ages were compared using an unpaired t-test. Categorical variables were compared using Fisher’s exact test.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Reliability of the Seegene Allplex™ STI Essential Assay for Detection of C. trachomatis

In order to evaluate the reliability of the Seegene Allplex™ STI Essential Assay for the detection of C. trachomatis, we analyzed with this assay 269 DNA samples collected from women who attended Lausanne University Maternity Hospital and manually extracted from vaginal swabs. These same samples were previously analyzed with a C. trachomatis-specific real-time qPCR targeting the cryptic plasmid, which is routinely used in our diagnostic laboratories [14,15]. In addition, the Seegene Allplex™ STI Essential Assay was also applied to 45 samples from our diagnostic laboratories previously determined as C. trachomatis-positive using the real-time qPCR mentioned above.
Altogether, of these 314 samples, 46 were positive in the C. trachomatis qPCR, while the Seegene Allplex™ STI Essential Assay detected 48 positive samples (Table 1). Only one sample classified as positive with the C. trachomatis real-time qPCR (Ct value: 38.1) was not detected as positive with the Seegene assay (1 false negative). However, this very low Ct value corresponds to less than 100 DNA copies/mL and is very close to the limit of detection of the qPCR assay [15]. Moreover, the Seegene Allplex™ STI Essential Assay detected three positive samples that were classified as negative by the classical qPCR (3 false positives).
Thus, when considering the C. trachomatis-specific real-time qPCR as the gold standard, the Seegene Allplex™ STI Essential Assay displayed a sensitivity of 97.8% and a specificity of 98.8%.
In addition, the 45 samples from our diagnostic laboratories that were positive in the C. trachomatis qPCR were also analyzed with the pan-Chlamydiales real-time qPCR. This qPCR, developed in our research group, targets a region of the 16SrRNA gene conserved in all bacteria belonging to the Chlamydiales order, including C. trachomatis [16]. Three samples positive in the C. trachomatis qPCR and the Seegene assay were negative in the pan-Chlamydiales qPCR, which confirms that this last test is less sensitive for the detection of C. trachomatis than the C. trachomatis-specific qPCR. This difference in sensitivity can be explained by the size of the amplified fragment, which is notably longer in the case of the pan-Chlamydiales qPCR (207–215 bp) compared with the C. trachomatis-specific qPCR (71 bp) [15,16].
The Seegene false-negative sample was positive in the pan-Chlamydiales qPCR although with a very high Ct value (39.90). To summarize, among 45 samples positive in the C. trachomatis-specific real-time qPCR, the Seegene assay failed to detect one (2.22%), and the pan-Chlamydiales failed to detect three (6.66%). As expected, this real-time qPCR is the least sensitive of the three NAATs used in this study.

3.2. Prevalence of Urogenital Microorganisms and Bacterial Vaginosis

Four hundred four samples from women who attended Lausanne University Maternity Hospital were analyzed with the Seegene Allplex™ STI Essential Assay. Seven samples were considered invalid by the analysis software, indicating some issues with the internal validation control of the assay. According to the manufacturer’s package insert, such invalid outcomes are typically due to inadequate specimen collection or the presence of inhibitors. However, these seven samples had been previously tested with the C. trachomatis specific real-time qPCR and were negative, with no evidence of the presence of inhibitors.
Among these 404 samples, 10 were positive for C. trachomatis, and 5 of these 10 were also positive for one or two other microorganisms detected by the same assay (see Supplementary Table S1). Our results thus indicate a prevalence of C. trachomatis infection of 2.5% in this group of women (Table 2). Interestingly, another study performed in western Switzerland revealed a slightly higher prevalence of C. trachomatis infection (5.9%) among sexually active young women under the age of 30, a value comparable to the one reported for European countries [17,18]. However, the populations of women enrolled in the two Swiss studies are not comparable, particularly regarding their age. Indeed, the median age of positive patients in the study by Bally et al. [17] was 20.3, whereas the median age of positive patients was 26 in our study. The results from these two studies thus suggest that the prevalence of C. trachomatis infection in young women in Switzerland is similar to that described in other countries and decreases with age [19,20,21].
In addition to C. trachomatis, the Seegene Allplex™ STI Essential Assay detects six other microorganisms, among which are N. gonorrhoeae and T. vaginalis, two important causes of sexually transmitted infections worldwide. We did not detect any N. gonorrhoeae infection among the 397 valid samples tested, and only two samples were positive for T. vaginalis (prevalence: 0.5%) (Table 2). These low values of prevalence are in accordance with what has been observed in other studies [22,23].
Finally, as shown in Table 2, the prevalence of genital mycoplasmas in our cohort was in agreement with what has been reported in previously published studies [9,24]. M. genitalium and M. hominis were detected in 0.3% and 3.5% of the samples, respectively, while U. urealyticum and U. parvum were detected, respectively, in 6.3% and 27.7% of the samples.
For the same group of samples, we also performed the Seegene Allplex™ Bacterial Vaginosis Assay and detected 18 positive cases (4.5%). All were positive for Gardnerella vaginalis, two samples were also positive for Mobiluncus spp., and 12 samples were positive for Atopobium vaginae (see Supplementary Table S2). Thirteen of the eighteen positive samples (72.2%) were associated with one or two of the seven microorganisms assessed with the Seegene Allplex™ STI Essential Assay (see Supplementary Table S2). Similar to what is described in the literature [9,25], M. hominis seemed to be strongly associated with bacteria, labeled in the Seegene assay as “bacterial vaginosis”, since 33.3% (1/3) of the samples positive only for this microorganism were also positive for “bacterial vaginosis” bacteria. U. urealyticum and U. parvum were also associated with “bacterial vaginosis” bacteria, but to a lesser extent (6.6% (1/15) and 6.5% (6/93)) of the Ureaplasma positive cases, respectively) [25]. Samples positive only for C. trachomatis, T. vaginalis, or M. genitalium were negative for “bacterial vaginosis” bacteria, as previously reported in other studies [25,26].

3.3. Association of C. trachomatis and Genital Mycoplasmas with Pre-Term Birth (PTB)

We then wished to determine if one of the microorganisms detected by the Seegene Allplex™ STI Essential Assay or the Bacterial Vaginosis Assay could be implicated in pre-term birth (PTB). For this purpose, we compared the prevalence of these microorganisms in a group of 97 women who spontaneously delivered before 37 weeks of gestation (PTB group) and in 217 women who attended a labor ward with uneventful term pregnancies and no history of miscarriages, stillbirths, or pre-term labor (control group) (Table 3) [14,27]. Our results indicated that C. trachomatis infection was significantly associated with pre-term birth (p = 0.03), as already described by others [28] and by Baud et al. in a previous study performed on the same samples [14]. No significant association with pre-term birth was observed for M. hominis, U. urealyticum, or U. parvum in the present study, although a role for these microorganisms in pre-term birth has been demonstrated previously [9,10]. Pre-term birth was also not associated with bacterial vaginosis. For statistical reasons, pathogens that were also detected with the Seegene Allplex™ STI Essential Assay but exhibited a prevalence of <1% (N. gonorrhoeae, T. vaginalis, and M. genitalium) could not be investigated regarding their possible role in pre-term birth and are thus not listed in Table 3.

4. Conclusions

Using a different NAAT from that in the study by Baud et al. [14], we confirmed a prevalence of 2.5% for C. trachomatis in a population of women, with a median age of 30, who attended Lausanne University Maternity Hospital. We also confirmed a statistically significant association between this pathogenic microorganism and pre-term birth.
Furthermore, we demonstrated the reliability of the Seegene Allplex™ STI Essential Assay in detecting C. trachomatis in DNA extracted from vaginal swabs. The sensitivity and specificity of this assay were about 98% and 99% when compared with the C. trachomatis real-time qPCR routinely used in our diagnostic laboratories. Given that this assay can simultaneously detect six other microorganisms, it is of high interest for the diagnosis of urogenital and sexually transmitted infections.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/diagnostics12051141/s1, Table S1: Bacterial Vaginosis Assay on C. trachomatis positive samples. Table reports detailed results of STI Essential and Bacterial vaginosis Assays; Table S2: STI Essentail Assay on samples positive for bacterial vaginosis. Table reports detailed results of Bacterial Vaginosis and STI Essential Assays.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization and analysis: G.G. and C.K.-B.; investigation: S.A. and D.B.; resources: D.B.; original draft preparation: C.K.-B.; review and editing: G.G.; supervision: G.G. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

This project was performed according to (i) the Declaration of Helsinki, (ii) the Swiss Human Research Act (HRO), and (iii) the Good Clinical Practice principles. This project was approved by the Ethics Committee of Canton Vaud, Switzerland (CER-VD number 138-06).

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

The datasets generated and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the R + D budget of the Institute of Microbiology. The Seegene kits were provided by Seegene and BÜHLMANN laboratories AG (research agreement). We thank the midwives and doctors who collected the samples for their enthusiasm and involvement in this study and S. ardissone for the careful reading of the manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

One of the authors (G.G.) has a potential conflict of interest. He received the diagnostic kit from Seegene for free as part of a research agreement. However, this agreement clearly states that Seegene may not prevent the publication of the study results, even if they are not favorable.

References

  1. Rowley, J.; Vander Hoorn, S.; Korenromp, E.; Low, N.; Unemo, M.; Abu-Raddad, L.J.; Chico, R.M.; Smolak, A.; Newman, L.; Gottlieb, S.; et al. Chlamydia, gonorrhoea, trichomoniasis and syphilis: Global prevalence and incidence estimates, 2016. Bull. World Health Organ. 2019, 97, 548–562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Manavi, K. A review on infection with Chlamydia trachomatis. Best Pract. Res. Clin. Obstet. Gynaecol. 2006, 20, 941–951. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Ammerdorffer, A.; Stojanov, M.; Greub, G.; Baud, D. Chlamydia trachomatis and chlamydia-like bacteria: New enemies of human pregnancies. Curr. Opin. Infect. Dis. 2017, 30, 289–296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Van Dooremalen, W.T.; Verweij, S.P.; Hartog, J.E.D.; Kebbi-Beghdadi, C.; Ouburg, S.; Greub, G.; Morré, S.A.; Ammerdorffer, A. Screening of chlamydia trachomatis and waddlia chondrophila antibodies in women with tubal factor infertility. Microorganisms 2020, 8, 918. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Adachi, K.; Klausner, J.D.; Bristow, C.C.; Xu, J.; Ank, B.; Morgado, M.G.; Watts, D.H.; Weir, F.; Persing, D.; Mofenson, L.M.; et al. Chlamydia and gonorrhea in hiv-infected pregnant women and infant HIV transmission. Sex Transm. Dis. 2015, 42, 554–565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Malhotra, M.; Sood, S.; Mukherjee, A.; Muralidhar, S.; Bala, M. Genital chlamydia trachomatis: An update. Indian J. Med. Res. 2013, 138, 303–316. [Google Scholar]
  7. Wiesenfeld, H.C. Screening for chlamydia trachomatis infections in women. N. Engl. J. Med. 2017, 376, 765–773. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Vallely, L.M.; Egli-Gany, D.; Wand, H.; Pomat, W.S.; Homer, C.S.E.; Guy, R.; Silver, B.; Rumbold, A.R.; Kaldor, J.M.; Vallely, A.J.; et al. Adverse pregnancy and neonatal outcomes associated with Neisseria gonorrhoeae: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Sex. Transm. Infect. 2021, 97, 104–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Taylor-Robinson, D.; Lamont, R. Mycoplasmas in pregnancy. BJOG Int. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. 2010, 118, 164–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Vouga, M.; Greub, G.; Prod’Hom, G.; Durussel, C.; Roth-Kleiner, M.; Vasilevsky, S.; Baud, D. Treatment of genital mycoplasma in colonized pregnant women in late pregnancy is associated with a lower rate of premature labour and neonatal complications. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2014, 20, 1074–1079. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Peter, C.; Alec, M.; Bigoni, J.; Toutous-Trellu, L.; Yaron, M. Update on Mycoplasma genitalium among women. Rev. Med. Suisse 2018, 14, 1893–1897. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  12. Vallely, L.M.; Egli-Gany, D.; Pomat, W.; Homer, C.S.; Guy, R.; Wand, H.; Silver, B.; Rumbold, A.R.; Kaldor, J.M.; Low, N.; et al. Adverse pregnancy and neonatal outcomes associated with Neisseria gonorrhoeae, Mycoplasma genitalium, M. hominis, Ureaplasma urealyticum and U. parvum: A systematic review and meta-analysis protocol. BMJ Open 2018, 8, e024175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Peng, L.; Chen, J.-L.; Wang, D. Progress and perspectives in point of care testing for urogenital chlamydia trachomatis infection: A review. Med. Sci. Monit. 2020, 26, e920873-1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Baud, D.; Goy, G.; Vasilevsky, S.; Osterheld, M.-C.; Roth-Kleiner, M.; Croxatto, A.; Greub, G. Roles of bovine Waddlia chondrophila and Chlamydia trachomatis in human preterm birth. New Microbes New Infect. 2014, 3, 41–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Jaton, K.; Bille, J.; Greub, G. A novel real-time PCR to detect Chlamydia trachomatis in first-void urine or genital swabs. J. Med. Microbiol. 2006, 55, 1667–1674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  16. Lienard, J.; Croxatto, A.; Aeby, S.; Jaton, K.; Posfay-Barbe, K.; Gervaix, A.; Greub, G. Development of a New chlamydiales-specific real-time pcr and its application to respiratory clinical samples. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2011, 49, 2637–2642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Bally, F.; Quach, A.; Greub, G.; Jaton, K.; Petignat, C.; Ambord, C.; Fellay, J.; Masserey, E.; Spencer, B. Opportunistic testing for urogenital infection with Chlamydia trachomatis in south-western Switzerland, 2012: A feasibility study. Eurosurveillance 2015, 20, 21051. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Lanjouw, E.; Ouburg, S.; de Vries, H.; Stary, A.; Radcliffe, K.; Unemo, M. 2015 European guideline on the management of Chlamydia trachomatis infections. Int. J. STD AIDS 2015, 27, 333–348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Adams, E.J.; Charlett, A.; Edmunds, W.J.; Hughes, G. Chlamydia trachomatis in the United Kingdom: A systematic review and analysis of prevalence studies. Sex. Transm. Infect. 2004, 80, 354–362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Lewis, D.; Newton, D.C.; Guy, R.J.; Ali, H.; Chen, M.Y.; Fairley, C.K.; Hocking, J.S. The prevalence of Chlamydia trachomatis infection in Australia: A systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Infect. Dis. 2012, 12, 113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Panatto, D.; Amicizia, D.; Bianchi, S.; Frati, E.; Zotti, C.M.; Lai, P.L.; Domnich, A.; Colzani, D.; Gasparini, R.; Tanzi, E. Chlamydia trachomatisprevalence and chlamydial/HPV co-infection among HPV-unvaccinated young Italian females with normal cytology. Hum. Vaccines Immunother. 2014, 11, 270–276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  22. Field, N.; Clifton, S.; Alexander, S.; Ison, C.A.; Khanom, R.; Saunders, P.; Hughes, G.; Heath, L.; Beddows, S.; Mercer, C.H.; et al. Trichomonas vaginalis infection is uncommon in the British general population: Implications for clinical testing and public health screening. Sex. Transm. Infect. 2016, 94, 226–229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. Kirkcaldy, R.D.; Weston, E.; Segurado, A.C.; Hughes, G. Epidemiology of gonorrhoea: A global perspective. Sex. Health 2019, 16, 401–411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Baumann, L.; Cina, M.; Egli-Gany, D.; Goutaki, M.; Halbeisen, F.S.; Lohrer, G.-R.; Ali, H.; Scott, P.; Low, N. Prevalence of mycoplasma genitalium in different population groups: Systematic review andmeta-analysis. Sex. Transm. Infect. 2018, 94, 255–262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  25. Keane, E.A.; Thomas, B.J.; Gilroy, C.B.; Renton, A.; Taylor-Robinson, D. The association of Mycoplasma hominis, Ureaplasma urealyticum and Mycoplasma genitalium with bacterial vaginosis: Observations on heterosexual women and their male partners. Int. J. STD AIDS 2000, 11, 356–360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Donders, G.G.; Ruban, K.; Bellen, G.; Petricevic, L. Mycoplasma/Ureaplasma infection in pregnancy: To screen or not to screen. J. Périnat. Med. 2017, 45, 505–515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Baud, D.; Goy, G.; Osterheld, M.-C.; Croxatto, A.; Borel, N.; Vial, Y.; Pospischil, A.; Greub, G. Role of Waddlia chondrophila placental infection in miscarriage. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2014, 20, 460–464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Kanninen, T.T.; Quist-Nelson, J.; Sisti, G.; Berghella, V. Chlamydia trachomatis screening in preterm labor: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol. 2019, 240, 242–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Table
Table 1. Comparison of the performance of the Seegene Allplex™ STI Essential Assay and of our routine C. trachomatis qPCR. Please note the excellent congruent results obtained, with an overall agreement of 98.7% (310/314).
Table 1. Comparison of the performance of the Seegene Allplex™ STI Essential Assay and of our routine C. trachomatis qPCR. Please note the excellent congruent results obtained, with an overall agreement of 98.7% (310/314).
Seegene Allplex™ STI Essential Assay
PositiveNegative
qPCRpositive451
C. trachomatisnegative3265
Table
Table 2. Number of positive cases and prevalence of C. trachomatis, N. gonorrhoeae, T. vaginalis, M. hominis, M. genitalium, U. urealyticum, U. parvum, and bacterial vaginosis among 397 women who attended Lausanne University Maternity Hospital (median age = 30 +/− 5.5).
Table 2. Number of positive cases and prevalence of C. trachomatis, N. gonorrhoeae, T. vaginalis, M. hominis, M. genitalium, U. urealyticum, U. parvum, and bacterial vaginosis among 397 women who attended Lausanne University Maternity Hospital (median age = 30 +/− 5.5).
Positive Cases Prevalence
Chlamydia trachomatis102.5%
Neisseria gonorrhoeae00.0%
Trichomonas vaginalis20.5%
Mycoplasma hominis143.5%
Mycoplasma genitalium10.3%
Ureaplasma urealyticum256.3%
Ureaplasma parvum11027.7%
Bacterial vaginosis *184.5%
* PCR positive for G. vaginalis +/− other bacteria such as Mobiluncus spp. and A. vaginae.
Table
Table 3. Number of positive cases and prevalence of C. trachomatis, M. hominis, U. urealyticum, U. parvum, and bacterial vaginosis in women with uneventful pregnancy (control group, n = 217) and in women who spontaneously delivered before 37 weeks of gestation (PTB group, n = 97).
Table 3. Number of positive cases and prevalence of C. trachomatis, M. hominis, U. urealyticum, U. parvum, and bacterial vaginosis in women with uneventful pregnancy (control group, n = 217) and in women who spontaneously delivered before 37 weeks of gestation (PTB group, n = 97).
Controls (n = 217)PTB (n = 97)p-Value
Chlamydia trachomatis2 (0.92%)5 (5.15%)0.031
Mycoplasma hominis6 (2.76%)5 (5.15%)0.324
Ureaplasma urealyticum12 (5.53%)10 (10.31%)0.151
Ureaplasma parvum54 (24.88%)33 (34.02%)0.103
Bacterial vaginosis *8 (3.69%)4 (4.12%)>0.999
* PCR-positive for G. vaginalis +/− other bacteria, such as Mobiluncus spp. and A. vaginae.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Kebbi-Beghdadi, C.; Aeby, S.; Baud, D.; Greub, G. Evaluation of a Multiplex Real-Time PCR Assay for Detecting Chlamydia trachomatis in Vaginal Samples. Diagnostics 2022, 12, 1141. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12051141

AMA Style

Kebbi-Beghdadi C, Aeby S, Baud D, Greub G. Evaluation of a Multiplex Real-Time PCR Assay for Detecting Chlamydia trachomatis in Vaginal Samples. Diagnostics. 2022; 12(5):1141. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12051141

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kebbi-Beghdadi, Carole, Sebastien Aeby, David Baud, and Gilbert Greub. 2022. "Evaluation of a Multiplex Real-Time PCR Assay for Detecting Chlamydia trachomatis in Vaginal Samples" Diagnostics 12, no. 5: 1141. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12051141

APA Style

Kebbi-Beghdadi, C., Aeby, S., Baud, D., & Greub, G. (2022). Evaluation of a Multiplex Real-Time PCR Assay for Detecting Chlamydia trachomatis in Vaginal Samples. Diagnostics, 12(5), 1141. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12051141

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop