Next Article in Journal
Ultrasound-Based Diagnostic Methods: Possible Use in Fatty Liver Disease Area
Next Article in Special Issue
More than Just Skin-Deep: A Review of Imaging’s Role in Guiding CAR T-Cell Therapy for Advanced Melanoma
Previous Article in Journal
Spontaneous Left External Iliac Vein Rupture
Previous Article in Special Issue
Polymorphic Malignant Melanoma (PMM) of the Left Helix: Case Report with Clinical-Pathological Correlations
 
 
Communication
Peer-Review Record

Melanoma Detection by Non-Specialists: An Untapped Potential for Triage?

Diagnostics 2022, 12(11), 2821; https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12112821
by Carmen Cantisani 1, Luca Ambrosio 1, Carlotta Cucchi 1, Fanni Adél Meznerics 2, Norbert Kiss 2,*, András Bánvölgyi 2, Federica Rega 1, Flavia Grignaffini 3, Francesco Barbuto 3, Fabrizio Frezza 3 and Giovanni Pellacani 1
Reviewer 1:
Reviewer 2:
Reviewer 3:
Diagnostics 2022, 12(11), 2821; https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12112821
Submission received: 10 October 2022 / Revised: 26 October 2022 / Accepted: 15 November 2022 / Published: 16 November 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Imaging Diagnosis for Melanoma 2.0)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Well written paper, introduction is too long and is missing information about use of dermoscopy among PCPs and APPs in Australia, US. There is no need to describe all imaging modalities and use of AI. It doesn't set the scene for the upcoming study problem.

Discussion ,again, not focusing on the study problem and its outcomes.Authors don't compare their outcomes to other similar studies and don't discuss them. Too much focus on imaging modalities while the goal is not emphasized enough.

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

Honestly, I don’t understand the interest of this paper, We all know that general practitioners use skin imaging techniques in the areas of the globe where skin cancer -especially melanoma - is frequent especially Australia, and USA , it could be interesting maybe in your context, if it is the case, you   should state it  .

Also, your results are not surprising because the non specialist received a short training in melanoma dermoscopy as you stated in your  manuscript , so they will be able to diagnose atypical  lesions  

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 3 Report

The study is interesting and well written. It deals with important aspect of public health such as faster and easier detection of melanoma. However it requires some modification

The introduction should me modified. It describes different techniques of artificial intelligence however the aim of the study is comparison of screening efficacy of non- specialist and professional dermatologist

Discussion section: The authors did not mention that this study is the first study. Therefore  it would be interesting to compare the obtained results with other literature data.

Conclusions should be rewrite.  “ However, combined with the presently evolving artificial intelligence- based diagnostic tools, the inclusion of non-specialists such as general practitioners in melanoma screening might represent an updated potential for triage” –There are no data in the study that support this conclusion

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round 2

Reviewer 2 Report

Dear editor, 

I thank you for sending me this manuscript for a second review 

the idea of the manuscript is not original as i stated in the first review , but it could be of interest for skin cancer management and triage in Europe 

 

Back to TopTop