Next Article in Journal
A Symmetry-Driven Adaptive Dual-Subpopulation Tree–Seed Algorithm for Complex Optimization with Local Optima Avoidance and Convergence Acceleration
Previous Article in Journal
Optical Character Recognition Method Based on YOLO Positioning and Intersection Ratio Filtering
Previous Article in Special Issue
Multi-View Utility-Based Clustering: A Mutually Supervised Perspective
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Special Issue: Machine Learning and Data Analysis II

Department of Computer Networks and Systems, Silesian Univeristy of Technology, ul. Akademicka 16, 44-100 Gliwice, Poland
Symmetry 2025, 17(8), 1199; https://doi.org/10.3390/sym17081199
Submission received: 21 July 2025 / Accepted: 25 July 2025 / Published: 28 July 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Machine Learning and Data Analysis II)
In an age defined by massive data generation, machine learning has emerged as a transformative tool to uncover meaningful patterns and drive intelligent decision-making. By blending statistical methods with algorithmic learning, machine learning enables systems to adapt and improve performance without being explicitly programmed. When coupled with data analysis, the process of inspecting, cleaning, and interpreting data sets, it unlocks powerful capabilities across industries, from predictive healthcare and financial forecasting to personalized marketing and autonomous systems. Together, these technologies form the backbone of modern analytics, redefining how we understand complex information and act upon it.
Following the first volume of this Special Issue, we invited scientists to contribute to its continuation. Finally we received almost 40 submissions and decided to accept 8 of them. The accepted papers present different data analysis techniques:
  • Boolean reasoning (contribution 1);
  • Classic neural networks (contribution 2);
  • Deep learning (contributions 3 and 4);
  • Decision tree-based approaches (contribution 4);
  • Density estimation (contribution 5);
  • Natural language processing (contribution 6);
  • Genetic algorithms (contribution 7);
  • Clustering (contribution 8).
Moreover, these papers are related to data from completely different domains, such as
  • Bioinformatics (contribution 1);
  • Biology (contribution 2);
  • Chemistry (contributions 3 and 4);
  • Text analysis (contribution 6);
  • Network traffic (contribution 7);
  • Computer vision (contribution 8).
Boolean reasoning [1] is a data analysis paradigm where the original problem is represented as a Boolean formula and the results of its processing correspond directly to the solutions of the initial problem. This approach is widely applied in rough set theory [2] and digital circuit design [3]. Contribution 1 shows the ability of Boolean reasoning to search for a new kind of pattern in biomedical data.
Measurement of blood microflow is crucial to understanding how blood behaves at the cellular level, especially in tiny vessels such as capillaries and arterioles. Tracking changes in microcirculation helps monitor conditions such as liver fibrosis, cardiogenic shock, and rheumatic diseases [4]. Simultaneous measurement of properties such as viscosity, aggregation of red blood cells, and sedimentation reveals how blood flow is altered in disease states [5]. Contribution 2 provides an analysis of the application of artificial neural networks to estimate the velocity of blood microflows.
Chemistry is also a field of data analysis that uses machine learning techniques to interpret experimental results [6]. Notable applications include prediction of polymer properties [7], reaction characteristics [8], and battery behavior [9]. This Special Issue contains two papers that show the application of machine learning in chemistry. Contribution 3 focuses just on battery issues, while contribution 4 applies ML techniques to predict the properties of water–alumina nanofluids.
Density estimation, or, more formally, density function estimation, means the estimation of an unknown density function with some observation-based formula [10]. Kernel-based methods are among the most popular approaches for the estimation of density functions [11,12,13]. The other branch of methods is based on the assumption that empiric observations do not come from a single distribution but are the result of several different ones (normal). This approach is called a Gaussian Mixture Model [14]. Contribution 5 focuses on estimation with neural techniques [15] in the context of normalizing flows.
The late 1950s brought the first suggestion of automated text analysis for the purpose of preparing abstracts from the technical literature [16]. More than 40 years later, a strong mathematical background for so-called “text mining” was already developed [17,18,19]. Today, text mining methods help to cluster texts [20], summarize them [21,22], label them [23], or compare the style of two documents (stylometry) [24,25]. In addition, emotions expressed in the text can become a point of interest for analysis [26]. This last idea was raised in contribution 6. The authors directed their attention towards the change in people’s emotions extracted from online comments over time.
Multi-access Edge Computing (MEC) refers to the provision of cloud computing technology and IT services at the edge of mobile networks [27]. However, due to limited resources in MEC technology, it becomes crucial to ensure a balance, e.g., between maximizing efficiency and minimizing cost (energy consumption) [28]. In contribution 7 the authors present a new algorithm, called GA4QST, which helps to find an optimal solution for the compromise between a satisfactory level of QoS and its potential cost.
Clustering, also called cluster analysis or unsupervised classification, means searching for subgroups of objects or features whose elements are more similar to others within the group than to those outside the group. Such an approach to data analysis was already stated in the 1950s [29]: the k-means algorithm. Since then, a variety of clustering techniques have been developed, for example, DBSCAN [30], Ward’s hierarchical approach [31], and self-organizing maps [32]. However, in some applications, especially in computer vision, when the features are clustered, a specific object (image) can be interpreted from many different points of view. Such datasets are then called multiview or multimodal [33] and require dedicated machine learning techniques [34]. Contribution 8 provides a new solution for this case called MUC: the multi-view utility-based clustering method.

Conflicts of Interest

The author declares no conflicts of interest.

List of Contributions

  • Michalak, M.; Aguilar-Ruiz, J.S. Shifting Pattern Biclustering and Boolean Reasoning Symmetry. Symmetry 2023, 15, 1977. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym15111977.
  • Alfonso Perez, G.; Colchero Paetz, J.V. Velocity Estimations in Blood Microflows via Machine Learning Symmetries. Symmetry 2024, 16, 428. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym16040428.
  • Oyucu, S.; Dümen, S.; Duru, İ.; Aksöz, A.; Biçer, E. Discharge Capacity Estimation for Li-Ion Batteries: A Comparative Study. Symmetry 2024, 16, 436. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym16040436.
  • Vaferi, B.; Dehbashi, M.; Alibak, A.H. Cutting-Edge Machine Learning Techniques for Accurate Prediction of Agglomeration Size in Water–Alumina Nanofluids. Symmetry 2024, 16, 804. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym16070804.
  • Coccaro, A.; Letizia, M.; Reyes-González, H.; Torre, R. Comparison of Affine and Rational Quadratic Spline Coupling and Autoregressive Flows through Robust Statistical Tests. Symmetry 2024, 16, 942. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym16080942.
  • Wang, S.; Liu, Q.; Hu, Y.; Liu, H. Public Opinion Evolution Based on the Two-Dimensional Theory of Emotion and Top2Vec-RoBERTa. Symmetry 2025, 17, 190. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym17020190.
  • Xiang, Z.; Ying, F.; Yan, H.; Zheng, Z.; Zhang, Y.; Xu, Y. QoS-Effective and Resilient Service Deployment and Traffic Management in MEC-Based Crowd Sensing. Symmetry 2025, 17, 718. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym17050718.
  • Jiang, Z.; Zhou, J.; Wang, S. Multi-View Utility-Based Clustering: A Mutually Supervised Perspective. Symmetry 2025, 17, 924. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym17060924.

References

  1. Brown, F.M. Boolean Reasoning; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 1990. [Google Scholar]
  2. Pawlak, Z.; Skowron, A. Rough Sets and Boolean Reasoning. Inf. Sci. 2007, 177, 41–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Kuehlmann, A.; Paruthi, V.; Krohm, F.; Ganai, M. Robust Boolean reasoning for equivalence checking and functional property verification. IEEE Trans. Comput.-Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst. 2002, 21, 1377–1394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Le, A.V.; Fenech, M. Image-Based Experimental Measurement Techniques to Characterize Velocity Fields in Blood Microflows. Front. Physiol. 2022, 13, 886675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Kang, Y.J. Blood rheometer based on microflow manipulation of continuous blood flows using push-and-back mechanism. Anal. Methods 2021, 13, 4871–4883. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Shi, Y.F.; Yang, Z.X.; Ma, S.; Kang, P.L.; Shang, C.; Hu, P.; Liu, Z.P. Machine Learning for Chemistry: Basics and Applications. Engineering 2023, 27, 70–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Hickey, K.; Feinstein, J.; Sivaraman, G.; MacDonell, M.; Yan, E.; Matherson, C.; Coia, S.; Xu, J.; Picel, K. Applying machine learning and quantum chemistry to predict the glass transition temperatures of polymers. Comput. Mater. Sci. 2024, 238, 112933. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Tu, Z.; Stuyver, T.; Coley, C.W. Predictive chemistry: Machine learning for reaction deployment, reaction development, and reaction discovery. Chem. Sci. 2023, 14, 226–244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Yang, Z.; Zhang, Y.; Zhang, Y. Prediction of the SOH and cycle life of fast-charging lithium-ion batteries based on a machine learning framework. Future Batter. 2025, 7, 100088. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Rosenblatt, M. Remarks on Some Nonparametric Estimates of a Density Function. Ann. Math. Stat. 1956, 27, 832–837. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Nadaraya, E.A. On Estimating Regression. Theory Probab. Its Appl. 1964, 9, 141–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Watson, G.S. Smooth Regression Analysis. Sankhyā Indian J. Stat. Ser. A (1961–2002) 1964, 26, 359–372. [Google Scholar]
  13. Scott, D.W. Multivariate Density Estimation: Theory, Practice, and Visualization; John Wiley & Sons, Inc.: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 1992. [Google Scholar]
  14. Reynolds, D. Gaussian Mixture Models. In Encyclopedia of Biometrics; Li, S.Z., Jain, A., Eds.; Springer: Boston, MA, USA, 2009; pp. 659–663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Magdon-Ismail, M.; Atiya, A. Neural networks for density estimation. In Proceedings of the 1998 Conference on Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems II, Denver, CO, USA, 30 November–5 December 1998; MIT Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 1999; pp. 522–528. [Google Scholar]
  16. Luhn, H.P. The Automatic Creation of Literature Abstracts. IBM J. Res. Dev. 1958, 2, 159–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Feldman, R.; Dagan, I. Knowledge discovery in Textual Databases (KDT). In Proceedings of the First International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD’95), Montréal, QC, Canada, 20–21 August 1995; AAAI Press: Menlo Park, CA, USA, 1995; pp. 112–117. [Google Scholar]
  18. Apté, C.; Damerau, F.; Weiss, S.M. Towards Language Independent Automated Learning of Text Categorization Models. In Proceedings of the SIGIR ’94, Dublin, Ireland, 3–6 July 1994; Croft, B.W., van Rijsbergen, C.J., Eds.; Springer: London, UK, 1994; pp. 23–30. [Google Scholar]
  19. Jacobs, P.S. Joining statistics with NLP for text categorization. In Proceedings of the Third Conference on Applied Natural Language Processing (ANLC ’92), Trento, Italy, 31 March–3 April 1992; pp. 178–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Petukhova, A.; Matos-Carvalho, J.P.; Fachada, N. Text clustering with large language model embeddings. Int. J. Cogn. Comput. Eng. 2025, 6, 100–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Radhakrishnan, P.; Senthil kumar, G. Machine Learning-Based Automatic Text Summarization Techniques. SN Comput. Sci. 2023, 4, 855. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Huang, Z.; Chen, X.; Wang, Y.; Huang, J.; Zhao, X. A survey on biomedical automatic text summarization with large language models. Inf. Process. Manag. 2025, 62, 104216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Potshangbam, K.S.; Singh, K.N. A similarity-based semi-supervised algorithm for labeling unlabeled text data. Expert Syst. Appl. 2026, 296, 128941. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Przystalski, K.; Argasiński, J.K.; Grabska-Gradzińska, I.; Ochab, J. Stylometry recognizes human and LLM-generated texts in short samples. Expert Syst. Appl. 2025, 296, 129001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Ouni, S.; Fkih, F.; Omri, M.N. Toward a new approach to author profiling based on the extraction of statistical features. Soc. Netw. Anal. Min. 2021, 11, 59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Li, H.; Liu, H.; Zhang, Z. Online persuasion of review emotional intensity: A text mining analysis of restaurant reviews. Int. J. Hosp. Manag. 2020, 89, 102558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Oikonomou, P.; Karanika, A.; Anagnostopoulos, C.; Kolomvatsos, K. On the Use of Intelligent Models towards Meeting the Challenges of the Edge Mesh. ACM Comput. Surv. 2021, 54, 1–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Chen, S.; Oikonomou, P.; Hua, Z.; Tziritas, N.; Djemame, K.; Zhang, N.; Theodoropoulos, G. QoS-aware placement of interdependent services in energy-harvesting-enabled multi-access edge computing. Future Gener. Comput. Syst. 2025, 174, 108009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Steinhaus, H. Sur la division des corps matériels en parties. Bull. L’Académie Pol. Sci. 1957, 4, 801–804. [Google Scholar]
  30. Ester, M.; Kriegel, H.P.; Sander, J.; Xu, X. A density-based algorithm for discovering clusters in large spatial databases with noise. In Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD’96), Portland, OR, USA, 2–4 August 1996; AAAI Press: Menlo Park, CA, USA, 1996; pp. 226–231. [Google Scholar]
  31. Ward, J.H. Hierarchical Grouping to Optimize an Objective Function. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 1963, 58, 236–244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Kohonen, T. Self-Organization and Associative Memory; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 1988. [Google Scholar]
  33. Hu, Z.; Cai, S.M.; Wang, J.; Zhou, T. Collaborative recommendation model based on multi-modal multi-view attention network: Movie and literature cases. Appl. Soft Comput. 2023, 144, 110518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Zhao, J.; Xie, X.; Xu, X.; Sun, S. Multi-view learning overview: Recent progress and new challenges. Inf. Fusion 2017, 38, 43–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Michalak, M. Special Issue: Machine Learning and Data Analysis II. Symmetry 2025, 17, 1199. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym17081199

AMA Style

Michalak M. Special Issue: Machine Learning and Data Analysis II. Symmetry. 2025; 17(8):1199. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym17081199

Chicago/Turabian Style

Michalak, Marcin. 2025. "Special Issue: Machine Learning and Data Analysis II" Symmetry 17, no. 8: 1199. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym17081199

APA Style

Michalak, M. (2025). Special Issue: Machine Learning and Data Analysis II. Symmetry, 17(8), 1199. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym17081199

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop