Abstract
In view of a general formula for higher order derivatives of the ratio of two differentiable functions, the authors establish the first form for the Maclaurin power series expansion of a logarithmic expression in term of determinants of special Hessenberg matrices whose elements involve the Bernoulli numbers. On the other hand, for comparison, the authors recite and revise the second form for the Maclaurin power series expansion of the logarithmic expression in terms of the Bessel zeta functions and the Bernoulli numbers.
Keywords:
maclaurin power series expansion; hessenberg matrix; determinant; bernoulli number; bessel zeta function; logarithmic expression; coefficient; derivative formula; tangent function MSC:
41A58; 26A09; 33B10
1. Introduction
In the mathematical handbook [1] (pp. 42, 55) and the paper [2] (p. 798), we find the Maclaurin power series expansions
for and the series expansion
for , where can be generated in [3] (p. 3) by
By the series expansion (3), we acquire the Maclaurin power series expansion
At the site https://mathoverflow.net/q/444321 (accessed on 7 April 2023), the second author proposed the following question: What and where is the Maclaurin power series expansion of the function
or
around ? Equivalently speaking, what is the Maclaurin power series expansion of the function
around ? These questions are fundamental and significant in the theory of series and in the theory of generating functions of analytic combinatorics.
In what follows, we consider the logarithmic expression
It is easy to see that the function is even on the symmetric interval .
It is well known that, by virtue of any computer software (or say, any computer algebra system) such as the Wolfram Mathematica, the Maple, and the MATLAB, one can compute great deal more but finitely many terms of the coefficients in the power series expansions of the functions formulated in (5)–(7). One problem is, what are the closed-form expressions for the general terms of the coefficients in the power series expansions of the functions in (5), (6), and (7), respectively?
In this paper, we adopt the definition of closed-form expressions at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Closed-form_expression (accessed on 7 May 2023): “In mathematics, a closed-form expression is a mathematical expression that uses a finite number of standard operations. It may contain constants, variables, certain well-known operations (e.g., + − × ÷), and functions (e.g., nth root, exponent, logarithm, trigonometric functions, and inverse hyperbolic functions), but usually no limit, or integral”. In the article [4], there is a special and systematic review and survey on “closed forms: what they are and why we care”.
An upper (or a lower, respectively) Hessenberg matrix is an matrix , whose elements for all tuples such that (or , respectively). See [5] (Chapter 10).
From the Maclaurin power series expansion (1), it follows that
which is analytic in . Because is an elementary function, all of its derivatives are elementary, and in theory there must exist a closed-form expression for the general term of all coefficients in the Maclaurin power series expansion of the elementary function around .
In this paper, motivated by the above ideas and observations and stimulated by the results in the newly-published papers [6,7], we will pay our main attention on expanding the even function into its Maclaurin power series expansion around .
In the theory of series, the Maclaurin power series expansion of an analytic function at the origin 0 is unique. In this paper, we will provide and compare two forms for the Maclaurin power series expansion of around .
2. Preliminaries
For attaining our main aims of this paper, we need the following preliminaries.
Let and be two n-time differentiable functions on an interval I for a given integer . Then, the nth derivative of the ratio is
where the matrix
the matrix is an matrix whose elements satisfy for , the matrix is an matrix whose elements are
for and , and the notation denotes the determinant of the matrix . The Formula (9) is a reformulation of Exercise 5 in [8] (p. 40).
It is common knowledge [3] (p. 51, (3.9)) that the classical gamma function can be defined by
It is also well known that the Bessel function of the first kind can be represented [9] (p. 360, Entry 9.1.10) as
where is called the order of .
Let for and denote the zeros of the function . The Bessel zeta function
was originally introduced and studied in [10,11,12,13]. In [14] (p. 1251), the special values
are listed. These values were recited in [15] (p. 411, Equation (6)). However, as listed at the web site https://math.stackexchange.com/a/2911997 (accessed on 8 May 2023), the special values , , and should be corrected as
and
In the paper [16], three more special values
and
were derived.
Making use of the general Formula (9) for the nth derivative of the ratio of two nth differentiable functions, the authors established in [15] (Theorems 2.3 and 3.2) two closed-form formulas
and
for and , where the matrix is defined by
the matrix is defined by
the matrix is defined by
and the matrix is defined by
We note that the determinantal expressions (11) and (12) can be transferred to each other by simple linear algebraic operations on determinants.
3. The First Form of Maclaurin Power Series Expansion
In this section, making use of the general Formula (9), we now start out by establishing the first closed-form Maclaurin power series expansion of the function defined by (7).
Theorem 1.
Proof.
The first derivative of is
By virtue of the Marclaurin power series expansions (1) and (2), we derive
and
for . Accordingly, we obtain
and
for . Hence, by the Formula (9), a general formula for the nth derivative of the ratio of two n-time differentiable functions, we arrive at
for . Considering that the function is even, we thus derive the Maclaurin power series expansion (13). The proof of Theorem 1 is complete. □
4. The Second Form of Maclaurin Power Series Expansion
At the site https://mathoverflow.net/a/444638 (accessed on 12 April 2023), Paul Enta (a physicist in France, https://stackexchange.com/users/3991904/paul-enta, accessed on 12 April 2023) outlined the second closed-form Maclaurin power series expansion of the function around . In this section, for comparison, we recite and revise Paul Enta’s result and its proof.
Theorem 2.
Proof.
From the integral representation
in [9] (p. 360, Entry 9.1.20), it follows that
The Formula (16) also appeared in [17] (p. 43).
Entry 7 in [18] (p. 26) reads that
Taking , letting , and replacing by w lead to
Basing on [19] (§15.41), Dickinson obtained in [20] (p. 949, Equation (14)) the formulas
and
for and , see also [9] (p. 370, Entry 9.5.10). Further considering the series expansion
we derive
Thus, we acquire
From the formula
see the paper [21], for example, we arrive at
for , where we use the relation
in [3] (p. 5, (1.14)) and stands for the Riemann zeta function.
5. Applications of Theorems 1 and 2 and Remarks
In this section, applying our main results, the Maclaurin power series expansions (13) and (15) in Theorems 1 and 2, respectively, we can derive some new results and important remarks.
As direct consequences of Theorem 1, we derive the following series expansions.
Corollary 1.
The series expansions
and
hold for .
Remark 1.
These two series expansions in Corollary 1 and the Maclaurin power series expansion (13), not including their proof and deduction, have been announced at the site https://mathoverflow.net/a/444485 (accessed on 10 April 2023) as the best answer to the question at https://mathoverflow.net/q/444321 (accessed on 7 April 2023).
As direct consequences of Theorem 2, the following series expansions can be deduced.
Corollary 2.
The series expansions
and
hold for .
Remark 2.
Corollary 2 can be regarded as an alternative answer to the question at https://mathoverflow.net/q/444321 (accessed on 7 April 2023).
Remark 3.
Remark 4.
Due to the evenness of te function , it follows that for . By virtue of the Formula (9), as in the proof of Theorem 1, we can derive
for . We believe that it would be very difficult to calculate this equality by operations of the linear algebra.
Proposition 1.
For , we have
and
Proof.
From the equation (8), it follows that
This means that the limits
hold for . Hence, by virtue of the Faá di Bruno formula [22], we obtain
for , where denotes the Bell polynomials of the second kind and satisfies
for , , and , see ([22], Remark 7.4). Accordingly, we arrive at for and
for . Consequently, we conclude
Comparing this with series expansions (13) and (15) leads to (21) and (22) for . □
Remark 5
(Computation of determinants). After obtaining the Maclaurin power series expansion (13), which is very symmetric and beautiful in mathematics, the next problem is: how to compute or expand the determinant into simpler forms?
At the site https://mathoverflow.net/q/444321#comment1147933_444336 (accessed on 11 April 2023), Fred Hucht (University of Duisburg-Essen) pointed out that “you can reduce the matrix size from to by rearranging the rows and columns, first the odd and then the even rows/cols. The resulting block diagonal matrix has one trivial and one non-trivial determinant”.
Remark 6
(Closed-form expressions). From the determinantal representations (11) and (12), we see that the quantity in the Maclaurin power series expansion (15) is of closed form. In [23] (Theorem 4.1), the closed-form formula
was discovered for the Bernoulli numbers , where and
for such that . Consequently, the general expression for coefficients in the Maclaurin power series expansion (15) in Theorem 2 is of closed form, essentially.
In fact, in theory, because all derivatives of analytic elementary functions are analytic and elementary, all analytic elementary functions must have unique series expansions whose coefficients are of closed form.
Remark 7.
One anonymous referee pointed out that the following result can be found in [24].
If
and , then can be written as
This result can be used to expand the function into a Maclaurin power series around , as achieved in the proof of Theorem 1.
Remark 8.
In [1] (p. 55), one can find the Maclaurin power series expansion
for . Taking the logarithm on both sides of the equality (17) and making use of the series expansion (24) reveal that
This observation comes from one anonymous referee of this paper.
Taking in (18) leads to
Remark 9
(Absolute monotonicity). From the Maclautin power series expansion (14), we see that the function is convex on . Strongly speaking, the function is absolutely monotonic on and completely monotonic on . On the other hand, the logarithmic function is a Bernstein function on .
We guess that the function is absolutely monotonic on . In other words, we guess that the function is logarithmically absolutely monotonic on , and then the sequence is negative for all . If this guess is true, then, from the Equation (19), the inequality
is true too. For the definitions, basic properties, and relations of the (logarithmically) absolutely (completely) monotonic functions and the Bernstein functions, please refer to the papers [26,27] and the monographs [28,29,30].
Remark 10
(Decreasing propoerty). Let be defined by (7) and
On 5 April 2023, Chao-Ping Chen (Henan Polytechnic University, China) guessed that the ratio is decreasing on and asked the second author for a proof.
On the night of 10 April 2023, Chao-Ping Chen, the initial proposer of the decreasing property of the function , privately acknowledged the second author that he found out a proof of the decreasing property of the function and applied the property in a draft of his joint manuscript titled “Cusa-type inequalities for trigonometric and hyperbolic functions”.
Iosif Pinelis (Michigan Technological University, USA) announced the second proof of the decreasing property of the function at the site https://mathoverflow.net/a/444526 (accessed on 10 April 2023) as an answer to his self-designed question at the site https://mathoverflow.net/q/444525 (accessed on 10 April 2023), which originates from the question at https://mathoverflow.net/q/444490 (accessed on 10 April 2023), Comment 1147661 at the site https://mathoverflow.net/questions/444490/ask-for-a-proof-of-an-inequality-involving-the-bernoulli-numbers#comment1147661_444490 (accessed on 10 April 2023), and Comment 1147671 at the site https://mathoverflow.net/questions/444490/ask-for-a-proof-of-an-inequality-involving-the-bernoulli-numbers#comment1147671_444490 (accessed on 10 April 2023).
The third proof of the decreasing property of the function was provided by River Li (https://stackexchange.com/users/14159649/river-li, accessed on 14 April 2023) at the site https://mathoverflow.net/a/444772 (accessed on 14 April 2023).
Remark 11
(Two guesses). In the paper [31], a monotonicity rule for the ratio of two Maclaurin power series was presented as follow.
Let and for be real numbers and the power series
be convergent on for some . If and the ratio is (strictly) increasing for , then the function is also (strictly) increasing on .
In [32] (pp. 10–11, Theorem 1.25), a monotonicity rule for the ratio of two functions was established as follows.
For with , let and be continuous on , differentiable on , and on . If the ratio is increasing on , then both and are increasing in .
First guess:
Making use of the Maclaurin power series expansions (4) and (13), we can write
for . By the above-mentioned monotonicity rule for the ratio of two Maclaurin power series, we see that if the ratio
were increasing in , then the function would be decreasing from the open interval onto the open interval .
We guess that the sequence in (28) is increasing in .
Second guess:
It is easy to see that we can write
Let
Then, from the Maclaurin power series expansion (4) and the relation (8), it follows that
and
for . Denote
In the light of the above-mentioned monotonicity rules for the ratio of two functions and for the ratio of two Maclaurin power series in sequence, we see that if the sequence were decreasing in , that is, if the inequality
were valid for , the function would be decreasing on .
At the site https://mathoverflow.net/q/444490 (accessed 10 April 2023), the second author asked for a proof of the inequality (29).
Remark 12.
We can formulate
In [1] (p. 43) and [22] (Theorem 2.1), we find
and
Differentiating results in
and
Substituting the last three power series expansions into (30) and simplifying yield
We now consider the sequence
for . By induction, it follows that
The increasing property of the sequence is equivalent to
for . By induction, we can verify that
and that the inequality (31) is valid for , but not for . Hence, the sequence is increasing for , but
As a generalization of the monotonicity rule for the ratio of two Maclaurin power series, the following monotonicity rule was established in [33] (Theorem 2.1).
Let and be two differentiable functions on the finite or infinite interval such that on . Define
Let
be two different real power series which are convergent on and for . Suppose that the sequence for is decreasing for and increasing for , where is a fixed positive integer. Then the function is decreasing on if and only if . If , then there exists a number such that the function is decreasing on and increasing on .
By straightforward computation, we obtain
Accordingly, the function
is decreasing in .
Remark 13.
This paper is an important sibling of the articles [6,7].
6. Conclusions
By virtue of the derivative Formula (9), we established the first form of the Maclaurin power series expansion (13) of the logarithmic expression in term of the Hessenberg determinants whose elements involve the Bernoulli numbers . On the other hand, we recited and revised the second form and its proof of the Maclaurin power series expansion (15) of the logarithmic expression in terms of the Bessel zeta functions and the Bernoulli numbers for .
In summary, our results in this paper are original. We believe that our results will be widely applied to other areas of mathematical sciences.
Author Contributions
Conceptualization, Y.-W.L., F.Q. and W.-S.D.; methodology, Y.-W.L., F.Q. and W.-S.D.; software, Y.-W.L., F.Q. and W.-S.D.; validation, Y.-W.L., F.Q. and W.-S.D.; formal analysis, Y.-W.L., F.Q. and W.-S.D.; investigation, Y.-W.L., F.Q. and W.-S.D.; resources, Y.-W.L., F.Q. and W.-S.D.; data curation, Y.-W.L., F.Q. and W.-S.D.; writing—original draft preparation, Y.-W.L., F.Q. and W.-S.D.; writing—review and editing, Y.-W.L., F.Q. and W.-S.D.; visualization, Y.-W.L., F.Q. and W.-S.D.; supervision, Y.-W.L., F.Q. and W.-S.D.; project administration, Y.-W.L., F.Q. and W.-S.D.; funding acquisition, Y.-W.L., F.Q. and W.-S.D. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Funding
The first author, Yue-Wu Li, was partially supported by the Doctors Foundation of Hulunbuir University (Grant No. 2018BS12) in China. The third author, Wei-Shih Du, was partially supported by the National Science and Technology Council of the Republic of China (Grant No. NSTC 112-2115-M-017-002).
Institutional Review Board Statement
Not applicable.
Informed Consent Statement
Not applicable.
Data Availability Statement
Data sharing is not applicable to this article as no new data were created or analyzed in this study.
Acknowledgments
The authors are grateful to anonymous referees for their helpful suggestions, careful corrections, and valuable comments on the original version of this paper.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
References
- Gradshteyn, I.S.; Ryzhik, I.M. Table of Integrals, Series, and Products; Translated from the Russian, Translation edited and with a preface by Daniel Zwillinger and Victor Moll, Eighth edition, Revised from the seventh edition; Elsevier/Academic Press: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Brychkov, Y.A. Power expansions of powers of trigonometric functions and series containing Bernoulli and Euler polynomials. Integral Transform. Spec. Funct. 2009, 20, 797–804. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Temme, N.M. Special Functions: An Introduction to Classical Functions of Mathematical Physics; A Wiley-Interscience Publication; John Wiley & Sons, Inc.: New York, NY, USA, 1996. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Borwein, J.M.; Crandall, R.E. Closed forms: What they are and why we care. Not. Am. Math. Soc. 2013, 60, 50–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Serre, D. Matrices, Theory and Applications; Graduate Texts in Mathematics 216; Translated from the 2001 French original; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2002. [Google Scholar]
- Liu, X.-L.; Long, H.-X.; Qi, F. A series expansion of a logarithmic expression and a decreasing property of the ratio of two logarithmic expressions containing sine. Mathematics 2023, 11, 3107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sun, Z.-Y.; Guo, B.-N.; Qi, F. Determinantal expressions, identities, concavity, Maclaurin power series expansions for van der Pol numbers, Bernoulli numbers, and cotangent. Axioms 2023, 12, 665. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bourbaki, N. Elements of Mathematics: Functions of a Real Variable: Elementary Theory; Translated from the 1976 French original by Philip Spain; Elements of Mathematics (Berlin); Springer: Berlin, Germany, 2004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Abramowitz, M.; Stegun, I.A. (Eds.) Handbook of Mathematical Functions with Formulas, Graphs, and Mathematical Tables; National Bureau of Standards; Applied Mathematics Series; 55, Reprint of the 1972 edition; Dover Publications, Inc.: New York, NY, USA, 1992. [Google Scholar]
- Kishore, N. A structure of the Rayleigh polynomial. Duke Math. J. 1964, 31, 513–518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kishore, N. Binary property of the Rayleigh polynomial. Duke Math. J. 1965, 32, 429–435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kishore, N. Congruence properties of the Rayleigh functions and polynomials. Duke Math. J. 1968, 35, 557–562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kishore, N. The Rayleigh polynomial. Proc. Am. Math. Soc. 1964, 15, 911–917. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Moll, V.H.; Vignat, C. On polynomials connected to powers of Bessel functions. Int. J. Number Theory 2014, 10, 1245–1257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hong, Y.; Guo, B.-N.; Qi, F. Determinantal expressions and recursive relations for the Bessel zeta function and for a sequence originating from a series expansion of the power of modified Bessel function of the first kind. CMES Comput. Model. Eng. Sci. 2021, 129, 409–423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- deLyra, J.L. On the sums of inverse even powers of zeros of regular Bessel functions. arXiv 2014, arXiv:1305.0228. [Google Scholar]
- Howard, F.T. Properties of the van der Pol numbers and polynomials. J. Reine Angew. Math. 1973, 260, 35–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Brychkov, Y.A. Handbook of Special Functions: Derivatives, Integrals, Series and Other Formulas; Chapman and Hall/CRC: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2008. [Google Scholar]
- Watson, G.N. A Treatise on the Theory of Bessel Functions; Macmillan: New York, NY, USA, 1944. [Google Scholar]
- Dickinson, D. On Lommel and Bessel polynomials. Proc. Am. Math. Soc. 1954, 5, 946–956. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Durán, A.J.; Pérez, M.; Varona, J.L. On the properties of zeros of Bessel series in the real line. Integral Transform. Spec. Funct. 2021, 32, 912–931. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Qi, F.; Taylor, P. Series expansions for powers of sinc function and closed-form expressions for specific partial Bell polynomials. Appl. Anal. Discrete Math. 2024, 18, 1–24. [Google Scholar]
- Chen, X.-Y.; Wu, L.; Lim, D.; Qi, F. Two identities and closed-form formulas for the Bernoulli numbers in terms of central factorial numbers of the second kind. Demonstr. Math. 2022, 55, 822–830. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hagen, R.J. On division of series. Am. J. Math. 1882, 5, 236–237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Qi, F. On Signs of Certain Toeplitz–Hessenberg Determinants Whose Elements Involve Bernoulli Numbers. Contrib. Discrete Math. 2024, 19. in press. Available online: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/356579520 (accessed on 2 August 2023).
- Berg, C. Integral representation of some functions related to the gamma function. Mediterr. J. Math. 2004, 1, 433–439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Guo, B.-N.; Qi, F. A property of logarithmically absolutely monotonic functions and the logarithmically complete monotonicity of a power-exponential function. Politehn. Univ. Buchar. Sci. Bull. Ser. A Appl. Math. Phys. 2010, 72, 21–30. [Google Scholar]
- Mitrinović, D.S.; Pečarić, J.E.; Fink, A.M. Classical and New Inequalities in Analysis; Kluwer Academic Publishers: Dordrecht, The Netherlands; Boston, MA, USA; London, UK, 1993. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Schilling, R.L.; Song, R.; Vondraček, Z. Bernstein Functions, 2nd ed.; de Gruyter Studies in Mathematics 37; Walter de Gruyter: Berlin, Germany, 2012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Widder, D.V. The Laplace Transform; Princeton Mathematical Series 6; Princeton University Press: Princeton, NJ, USA, 1941. [Google Scholar]
- Biernacki, M.; Krzyż, J. On the monotonity of certain functionals in the theory of analytic functions. Ann. Univ. Mariae Curie-Skłodowska Sect. A 1955, 9, 135–147. [Google Scholar]
- Anderson, G.D.; Vamanamurthy, M.K.; Vuorinen, M. Conformal Invariants, Inequalities, and Quasiconformal Maps; John Wiley & Sons: New York, NY, USA, 1997. [Google Scholar]
- Yang, Z.-H.; Chu, Y.-M.; Wang, M.-K. Monotonicity criterion for the quotient of power series with applications. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 2015, 428, 587–604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).