Next Article in Journal
Refinements of Ostrowski Type Integral Inequalities Involving Atangana–Baleanu Fractional Integral Operator
Next Article in Special Issue
Linear and Nonlinear Electrostatic Excitations and Their Stability in a Nonextensive Anisotropic Magnetoplasma
Previous Article in Journal
PQMLE of a Partially Linear Varying Coefficient Spatial Autoregressive Panel Model with Random Effects
Previous Article in Special Issue
Electron-Acoustic (Un)Modulated Structures in a Plasma Having (r, q)-Distributed Electrons: Solitons, Super Rogue Waves, and Breathers
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Symmetry Solutions and Conservation Laws for the 3D Generalized Potential Yu-Toda-Sasa-Fukuyama Equation of Mathematical Physics

by
Chaudry Masood Khalique
1,2,*,†,
Karabo Plaatjie
1,† and
Oageng Lawrence Diteho
1,†
1
Department of Mathematical Sciences, International Institute for Symmetry Analysis and Mathematical Modelling, North-West University, Mafikeng Campus, Private Bag X 2046, Mmabatho 2735, South Africa
2
Department of Mathematics and Informatics, Azerbaijan University, Jeyhun Hajibeyli Str., 71, Baku AZ1007, Azerbaijan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Symmetry 2021, 13(11), 2058; https://doi.org/10.3390/sym13112058
Submission received: 23 September 2021 / Revised: 14 October 2021 / Accepted: 21 October 2021 / Published: 1 November 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Mathematical Physics: Topics and Advances)

Abstract

:
In this paper we study the fourth-order three-dimensional generalized potential Yu-Toda-Sasa-Fukuyama (gpYTSF) equation by first computing its Lie point symmetries and then performing symmetry reductions. The resulting ordinary differential equations are then solved using direct integration, and exact solutions of gpYTSF equation are obtained. The obtained group invariant solutions include the solution in terms of incomplete elliptic integral. Furthermore, conservation laws for the gpYTSF equation are derived using both the multiplier and Noether’s methods. The multiplier method provides eight conservation laws, while the Noether’s theorem supplies seven conservation laws. These conservation laws include the conservation of energy and mass.

1. Introduction

Many natural phenomena of the real world are modelled using nonlinear partial differential equations (NPDEs). It is therefore important to find their exact solutions in order to understand the real world better. There have been several studies done on NPDEs and many researchers have suggested various techniques for finding exact solutions for such equations, since there is no general theory that can be applied to find exact solutions. These techniques include the Jacobi elliptic function expansion method [1], the homogeneous balance method [2], the Kudryashov’s method [3], the ansatz method [4], the inverse scattering transform method [5], the Bäcklund transformation [6], the Darboux transformation [7], the Hirota bilinear method [8], the ( G / G ) expansion method [9], and the Lie symmetry method [10,11,12,13,14,15], just to mention a few.
In the late 19th century, a powerful symmetry-based technique for solving differential equations (DEs), known today as Lie group analysis, was developed by the Norwegian mathematician Marius Sophus Lie (1844–1899). This technique is an efficient technique that can be used to compute exact solutions of DEs. It only became well-known in the early 1960s when the Russian mathematician L. V. Ovsyannikov (1919–2014) demonstrated the power of these methods for computing explicit solutions of complicated partial differential equations (PDEs) arising in mathematical physics. Since then, a robust amount of research based on Lie’s work has been published by various researchers.
The German mathematician Emmy Noether (1882–1935) in 1918 presented a procedure for deriving conservation laws for systems of DEs that are derived from the variational principle, and this procedure is referred to as Noether’s theorem [16]. A given DE that is derived from the variational principle should have a Lagrangian. However, there are DEs that are not derived from a variational principle and as a result Noether’s theorem cannot be invoked to determine conservation laws for such DEs. In such a case, multiplier method [12] or Ibragimov’s theorem on conservation laws [17] can be employed to construct conservation laws. The computation of conservation laws are very important as they play a vital role in the study of DEs. They describe physical conserved quantities, e.g., conservation of mass, energy, momentum, charge, and other constants of motion. They are also important for the investigation of integrability and uniqueness of solutions. See for example [16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25]. For the connection between the Lie and Noether symmetries, the reader is referred to [26,27].
The three-dimensional potential Yu-Toda-Sasa-Fukuyama (3DYTSF) equation given by
u x x x z 4 u t x + 3 u y y + 4 u x u x z + 2 u z u x x = 0
was introduced in [28] using the strong symmetry, and its travelling solitary wave solutions were presented. Yan [29] studied Equation (1) and obtained auto-Bäcklund transformations. Using auto-Bäcklund transformations, some exact solutions of (1) were found. These included the non-travelling wave solutions, soliton-like solutions, and rational solutions. The authors of [30] investigated Equation (1) using homoclinic and extended homoclinic test techniques, the two-soliton method along with bilinear form method, and obtained some new exact wave solutions that included periodic kink-wave, periodic soliton, cross kink wave, and doubly periodic wave solutions. In [31], the exp-function method, with the aid of symbolic computation, was employed, and new generalized solitary solutions and periodic solutions with free parameters were obtained. Using a modification of extended homoclinic test approach, the authors of [32] obtained some analytic solutions of 3DYTSF Equation (1). In [33], using some 1D subalgebras, group invariant solutions were constructed for (1) that involve arbitrary functions. Additionally, some particular solutions were sketched. Exact solutions that included lump solutions and interaction solutions of (1) were obtained using the generalized Hirota bilinear method [34]. In [35] analytical solutions and conservation laws for the 2D form of (1) were presented. Also, 2D and 3D graphical representations of the some solutions were given. N-soliton solutions were derived for (1) by using bilinear transformation that included period soliton, line soliton, lump soliton, and their interaction. Moreover, for some solutions their images were drawn and their dynamic behavior was discussed in [36]. The authors of [37] invoked the extended homoclininc test and Hirota bilinear method and constructed a class of lump solutions of (1). Additionally, periodic lump-type solutions were obtained in [37]. In [38], Equation (1) was reduced to the potential YTSF equation, which is a 2D equation (see also the ref [35]). General lump solutions of this equation were established and its propagation path was discovered. By letting u = w x , the authors of [39] increased the order of the (3+1) YTSF equation to five and applied Lie symmetry methods and constructed dark, bright, topological, Peregrine, and multi-soliton.
In this paper, we shall work with the three-dimensional generalized potential Yu-Toda-Sasa-Fukuyama (3DgYTSF) equation, namely
u x x x z 2 α u t x + β u y y + 2 α u x u x z + α u z u x x = 0 ,
where α , β , and γ are real constants. We seek to derive its exact solutions by using symmetry analysis, along with various other methods. Moreover, conserved quantities of Equation (2) are established using two approaches: multiplier approach and Noether’s approach.

2. Solutions of the 3DgYTSF Equation

In this section, we firstly present Lie point symmetries and symmetry reductions of 3DgYTSF Equation (2). Moreover, we obtain travelling wave solution of (2) by employing Kudryashov’s method.

2.1. Lie Point Symmetries

Here, we compute Lie point symmetries for the 3DgYTSF Equation (2). The vector field for this Equation (2) is written as
X = ξ 1 t + ξ 2 x + ξ 3 y + ξ 4 z + η u ,
where ξ 1 , ξ 2 , ξ 3 , ξ 4 , and η are functions of the variables t , x , y , z , and u. We recall that (3) is a Lie point symmetry of (2) if
X [ 4 ] E | E = 0 = 0 ,
where E u x x x z 2 α u t x + β u y y + 2 α u x u x z + α u z u x x . Here X [ 4 ] is the fourth prolongation [12] of (3) that is defined by
X [ 4 ] = X + ζ 2 u x + ζ 4 u z + ζ 12 u t x + ζ 22 u x x + ζ 33 u y y + ζ 24 u x z + ζ 2224 u x x x z
and the coefficients ζ s are given by [12]
ζ 1 = D t ( η ) u t D t ( ξ 1 ) u x D t ( ξ 2 ) u y D t ( ξ 3 ) u z D t ( ξ 4 ) , ζ 2 = D x ( η ) u t D x ( ξ 1 ) u x D x ( ξ 2 ) u y D x ( ξ 3 ) u z D x ( ξ 4 ) , ζ 3 = D y ( η ) u t D y ( ξ 1 ) u x D y ( ξ 2 ) u y D y ( ξ 3 ) u z D y ( ξ 4 ) , ζ 4 = D z ( η ) u t D z ( ξ 1 ) u x D z ( ξ 2 ) u y D z ( ξ 3 ) u z D z ( ξ 4 ) , ζ 12 = D z ( ζ 1 ) u t t D x ( ξ 1 ) u t x D x ( ξ 2 ) u t y D x ( ξ 3 ) u t z D x ( ξ 4 ) , ζ 22 = D x ( ζ 2 ) u t x D x ( ξ 1 ) u x x D x ( ξ 2 ) u x y D x ( ξ 3 ) u x z D x ( ξ 4 ) , ζ 33 = D y ( ζ 3 ) u t y D y ( ξ 1 ) u x y D y ( ξ 2 ) u y y D y ( ξ 3 ) u y z D y ( ξ 4 ) , ζ 24 = D z ( ζ 2 ) u t x D z ( ξ 1 ) u x x D z ( ξ 2 ) u x y D z ( ξ 3 ) u x z D z ( ξ 4 ) , ζ 2224 = D z ( ζ 222 ) u t x x x D z ( ξ 1 ) u x x x x D z ( ξ 2 ) u x x x y D z ( ξ 3 ) u x x x z D z ( ξ 4 ) .
From Equation (4) we get
{ X + ζ 2 u x + ζ 4 u z + ζ 12 u t x + ζ 22 u x x + ζ 33 u y y + ζ 24 u x z + ζ 2224 u x x x z } u x x x z 2 α u t x + β u y y + 2 α u x u x z + α u z u x x | ( 2 ) = 0 .
Upon expanding the determining Equation (6), we attain
α ζ 2 u x z + α ζ 4 u x x 2 α ζ 12 + α ζ 22 u z + β ζ 33 + 2 α ζ 24 u x + ζ 2224 | ( ) = 0 .
Substituting values of ζ 2 , ζ 4 , ζ 12 , ζ 22 , ζ 33 , ζ 24 , and ζ 2224 in the above equation, replacing u x x x z by 2 α u t x β u y y 2 α u x u x z α u z u x x and splitting on the derivatives of u, we get the over-determined system of twenty-two linear PDEs
ξ x 1 = 0 , ξ y 1 = 0 , ξ z 1 = 0 , ξ u 1 = 0 , ξ t t 1 = 0 , 2 ξ y 3 ξ t 1 ξ x 2 = 0 , β ξ y 2 α ξ t 3 = 0 , ξ z 2 = 0 , ξ u 2 = 0 , ξ x 3 = 0 , ξ z 3 = 0 , ξ u 3 = 0 , ξ t y 3 = 0 , ξ y y 3 = 0 , ξ u 3 = 0 , ξ x 4 = 0 , ξ y 4 = 0 , ξ z 4 + 4 ξ y 3 3 ξ t 1 = 0 , η u + 2 ξ y 3 ξ t 1 = 0 , η x + ξ t 4 = 0 , η z + 2 ξ t 2 = 0 , β η y y + 2 α ξ t t 4 = 0 .
Solving the above equations, we acquire the infinitesimals
ξ 1 = C 1 t + C 2 , ξ 2 = C 1 x + 2 C 3 x + α β y F 1 ( t ) + F 3 ( t ) , ξ 3 = C 3 y + F 1 ( t ) , ξ 4 = 3 C 1 z 4 C 3 z + F 2 ( t ) , η = C 1 u 2 C 3 u 2 α β y z F 1 ( t ) α β y 2 F 2 ( t ) x F 2 ( t ) 2 z F 3 ( t ) + y F 5 ( t ) + F 4 ( t ) ,
where C 1 , , C 3 are arbitrary constants and F j , j = 1 , 2 , , 5 are arbitrary functions of t. By taking F j ( t ) = 1 , j = 1 , 2 , , 5 , we obtain the following Lie point symmetries of the 3DgYTSF Equation (2):
X 1 = t , X 2 = x , X 3 = y , X 4 = z , X 5 = u , X 6 = y u , X 7 = t t x x + 3 z z + u u , X 8 = 2 x x + y y 4 z z 2 u u .
By solving the Lie equations together with initial conditions
d t ¯ d a = ξ 1 ( t ¯ , x ¯ , y ¯ , z ¯ , u ¯ ) , t ¯ | a = 0 = t , d x ¯ d a = ξ 2 ( t ¯ , x ¯ , y ¯ , z ¯ , u ¯ ) , x ¯ | a = 0 = x , d y ¯ d a = ξ 3 ( t ¯ , x ¯ , y ¯ , z ¯ , u ¯ ) , y ¯ | a = 0 = y , d z ¯ d a = ξ 4 ( t ¯ , x ¯ , y ¯ , z ¯ , u ¯ ) , z ¯ | a = 0 = z , d u ¯ d a = η ( t ¯ , x ¯ , y ¯ , z ¯ , u ¯ ) , u ¯ | a = 0 = u ,
we obtain the following group transformations that are generated by the Lie symmetries X i ( i = 1 , 2 , , 8 ) :
T 1 : ( t ¯ , x ¯ , y ¯ , z ¯ , u ¯ ) ( t + a , x , y , z , u ) , T 2 : ( t ¯ , x ¯ , y ¯ , z ¯ , u ¯ ) ( t , x + a , y , z , u ) , T 3 : ( t ¯ , x ¯ , y ¯ , z ¯ , u ¯ ) ( t , x , y + a , z , u ) , T 4 : ( t ¯ , x ¯ , y ¯ , z ¯ , u ¯ ) ( t , x , y , z + a , u ) , T 5 : ( t ¯ , x ¯ , y ¯ , z ¯ , u ¯ ) ( t , x , y , z , u + a ) , T 6 : ( t ¯ , x ¯ , y ¯ , z ¯ , u ¯ ) ( t , x , y , z , a y + u ) , T 7 : ( t ¯ , x ¯ , y ¯ , z ¯ , u ¯ ) ( t e a , x e a , y , z e 3 a , u e a ) , T 8 : ( t ¯ , x ¯ , y ¯ , z ¯ , u ¯ ) ( t , x e 2 a , y e a , z e 4 a , u e 2 a ) .
Consequently, if u = M ( t , x , y , z ) is a known solution of 3DgYTSF Equation (2), then by using the group of transformations T i ( i = 1 , 2 , , 8 ) , so are the functions
u 1 = M ( t + a , x , y , z ) , u 2 = M ( t , x + a , y , z ) , u 3 = M ( t , x , y + a , z ) , u 4 = M ( t , x , y , z + a ) , u 5 = M ( t , x , y , z ) + a , u 6 = M ( t , x , y , z ) a y , u 7 = M ( t e a , x e a , y , z e 3 a ) e a , u 8 = M ( t , x e 2 a , y e a , z e 4 a ) e 2 a .

2.2. Group Invariant Solutions under X 1 , , X 4

We now consider the linear combination of the four translation symmetries, namely X = X 1 + a X 2 + b X 3 + c X 4 , where a , b , c are arbitrary constants. Solving the associated characteristics equations of X, we acquire the invariants
f = x a t , g = y b t , h = z c t , u = θ ( f , g , h )
and using these invariants, the 3DgYTSF Equation (2) reduces to the NPDE
θ f f f h + 2 α a θ f f + b θ f g + c θ f h + β θ g g + 2 α θ f θ f h + α θ h θ f f = 0 .
The Lie symmetries of (8) are
Γ 1 = f , Γ 2 = g , Γ 3 = h , Γ 4 = θ , Γ 5 = g θ , Γ 6 = 2 3 f + α b g 3 β f + g g + 1 3 4 a h 4 c f 2 θ β + 2 α b 2 h β θ , Γ 7 = α b g 3 β 1 3 f f + h h + 1 3 4 a h + 2 c f + θ β + 2 α b 2 h β θ .
Now, utilizing the symmetry Γ 1 + d Γ 2 + e Γ 3 with d , e being arbitrary constants, we obtain the three invariants
r = g d f , s = h e f , θ = ϕ ( r , s ) ,
which reduces Equation (8) to the NPDE
d 3 ϕ r r r s 3 d 2 e ϕ r r s s 3 d e 2 ϕ r s s s e 3 ϕ s s s s + 2 α a d 2 ϕ r r + 4 α a d e ϕ r s + 2 α a e 2 ϕ s s 2 α b d ϕ r r 2 α b e ϕ r s 2 α c d ϕ r s 2 α c e ϕ s s + β ϕ r r + 2 α d 2 ϕ r ϕ r s + 2 α d e ϕ r ϕ s s + 4 α d e ϕ s ϕ r s + 3 α e 2 ϕ s ϕ s s + α d 2 ϕ s ϕ r r = 0 ,
The symmetries of (9) include
Σ 1 = r , Σ 2 = s , Σ 3 = ϕ
and utilizing the symmetry Σ = Σ 1 + ω Σ 2 , where ω is a constant, we obtain two invariants
ξ = s ω r , ϕ = ψ ( ξ ) .
Using these invariants, Equation (9) reduces to the nonlinear ordinary differential equation (NODE)
2 α a d 2 ω 2 + 2 α a e 2 + 2 α b e ω + 2 α c d ω + β ω 2 4 α a d e ω 2 α b d ω 2 2 α c e ψ 6 α d e ω 3 α d 2 ω 2 3 α e 2 ψ ψ + 3 d e 2 ω e 3 + ω 3 d 3 3 d 2 e ω 2 ψ = 0 ,
which we rewrite as
A ψ B ψ ψ + C ψ = 0 ,
where A = 2 α a d 2 ω 2 + 2 α a e 2 + 2 α b e ω + 2 α c d ω + β ω 2 4 α a d e ω 2 α b d ω 2 2 α c e , B = 6 α d e ω 3 α d 2 ω 2 3 α e 2 , and C = 3 d e 2 ω e 3 + ω 3 d 3 3 d 2 e ω 2 .

2.3. Solution via the Incomplete Elliptic Integral

We now obtain the solution of 3DgYTSF Equation (2) in terms of the incomplete elliptic integral. Twice integration of Equation (10) gives
C ψ 2 1 3 B ψ 3 + A ψ 2 + 2 c 1 ψ + 2 c 2 = 0 ,
where c 1 , c 2 are integration constants. By letting ψ ( ξ ) = Ψ ( ξ ) , Equation (11) transforms to
Ψ 2 B 3 C Ψ 3 + A C Ψ 2 + 2 c 1 C Ψ + 2 c 2 C = 0 ,
which has the well-known general solution [40,41]
Ψ ( ξ ) = γ 2 + ( γ 1 γ 2 ) cn 2 B γ 1 γ 3 12 C ( ξ ξ 0 ) , X 2 , X 2 = γ 1 γ 2 γ 1 γ 3 ,
where γ 1 > γ 2 > γ 3 are the real roots of the cubic polynomial Ψ 3 ( 3 A / B ) Ψ 2 ( 6 c 1 / B ) Ψ ( 6 c 2 ) / B = 0 , (cn) is the Jacobi cosine function and ξ 0 is arbitrary constant. Integration of Equation (13) yields the expression for ψ ( ξ ) , and thus reverting to the variables t , x , y , z , u , we gain the solution of 3DgYTSF Equation (2) as
u ( t , x , y , z ) = 12 C γ 1 γ 2 2 B γ 1 γ 3 X 8 EllipticE sn B γ 1 γ 3 12 C ( ξ ξ 0 ) , X 2 , X 2 + γ 2 γ 1 γ 2 1 X 4 X 4 ( ξ ξ 0 ) + k 0 ,
where k 0 , ξ 0 are constants, ξ = ( a e c + b ω a ω d ) t ( e + ω d ) x ω y + z and EllipticE [ g , k ] being the incomplete elliptic integral given as [42,43]
EllipticE [ v , m ] = 0 v 1 m 2 s 2 1 s 2 d s .
The wave profile of the periodic solution (14), for parametric values γ 1 = 102 , γ 2 = 53 , γ 3 = 58 , C = 0.7 , B = 0.25 , c 1 = 1.2 , z = 0 , e = 0.5 , d = 0.25 , o m e g a = 1.01 , a = 4.5 , c = 0.6 at t = 15 is given in Figure 1. We note that this solution gives a periodic wave graphics, since this general solution is periodic

2.4. Group Invariant Solution under X 7

Here we consider the Lie symmetry X 7 , which is given by
X 7 = t t x x + 3 z z + u u .
Solving the associated characteristic equations for X 7 , we accomplish the invariants
f = t x , g = y , h = z t 3 , Φ = u t .
The use of these invariants reduces the 3DgYTSF Equation (2) to
Φ f f f h 4 α Φ f 2 α f Φ f f + 6 α h Φ f h + β Φ g g + 2 α Φ f Φ f h + α Φ h Φ f f = 0 .
Equation (15) possesses six Lie symmetries
Γ 1 = g , Γ 2 = g Φ , Γ 3 = Φ , Γ 4 = f + 2 h Φ , Γ 5 = 2 f f + g g 4 h h 2 ϕ Φ , Γ 6 = h 3 f + 6 α g 2 β Φ .
The symmetry Γ 4 gives three invariants g , h , U = Φ 2 f h and consequently, the group-invariant solution is
Φ ( f , g , h ) = U g , h + 2 f h ,
which reduces Equation (15) to
U g g + 12 α β h = 0 ,
whose solution is given by
U = 6 α β g 2 h + g M ( h ) + K ( h ) ,
where M and K are functions of h. Thus, the invariant solution of the 3DYTSF Equation (2) under the symmetry X 7 is
u ( t , x , y , z ) = 2 x z t 6 α y 2 z β t 2 + t y M z t 3 + t K z t 3 .
In Figure 2, we depict the solution (16) with M z / t 3 = cos z / t 3 , K z / t 3 = sec h z / t 3 and parametric values β = 2 , α = 2 , x = 0 , t = 1 , z = 15 .
In Figure 3, we demonstrate the solution (16) with different choices of arbitrary functions, i.e., M z / t 3 = sec h z / t 3 , K z / t 3 = cos z / t 3 and the parameters β = 2 , α = 2 , x = 0 , t = 1 , z = 15 .

2.5. Group Invariant Solution under X 8

For the symmetry X 8 , we get the group-invariant solution as
u ( t , x , y , z ) = 1 x F f , g , h ,
where f , g , h , F are the invariants given by
f = t , g = y x , h = x 2 z , F = x u .
Substituting (17) into the 3DgYTSF Equation (2) gives the NODE
36 g h F g h h 12 g 2 h F g g h h + 48 g h 2 F g h h h 8 α g F f g + 32 α h F F h h + g 3 F g g g h 64 h 3 F h h h h 16 α F f + 32 α h F f h 16 α h F h 2 192 h 2 F h h h + 3 g 2 F g g h 3 g F g h 8 β F g g 48 h F h h 8 α g F F g h 6 α g F g F h 4 α g 2 F g F g h 96 α h 2 F h F h h 2 α g 2 F h F g g + 16 α g h F g F h h + 32 α g h F h F g h = 0
whose symmetry includes Γ 1 = / f . Using the symmetry Γ 1 , we get the invariants j 1 = g , j 2 = h , F = Ψ , which reduces Equation (18) to the NPDE
36 g h Ψ g h h 12 g 2 h Ψ g g h h + 48 g h 2 Ψ g h h h + 32 α h Ψ Ψ h h + g 3 Ψ g g g h 64 h 3 Ψ h h h h 16 α Ψ h 2 192 h 2 Ψ h h h + 3 g 2 Ψ g g h 3 g Ψ g h 8 β Ψ g g 48 h Ψ h h 8 α g Ψ Ψ g h 6 α g Ψ g Ψ h 4 α g 2 Ψ g Ψ g h 96 α h 2 Ψ h Ψ h h 2 α g 2 Ψ h Ψ g g + 16 α g h Ψ g Ψ h h + 32 α g h Ψ h Ψ g h = 0
with two independent variables. Thus, we have reduced the number of independent variables of 3DgYTSF Equation (2) by two.

3. Conservation Laws of (2)

In this section we construct conservation laws of the 3DgYTSF Equation (2) by using two different approaches, namely, the multiplier method and Noether’s approach.

3.1. Conservation Laws Using the Multiplier Approach

We seek first-order multiplier Q = Q ( t , x , y , z , u , u t , u x , u y ) by applying the determining equation for the multipliers
δ δ u Q u x x x z 2 α u t x + β u y y + 2 α u x u x z + α u z u x x = 0 ,
where the Euler-Lagrange operator δ / δ u in our case is defined as
δ δ u = u D t u t D x u x D z u z + D t D x u t x + D x 2 u x x + D y 2 u y y + D x D z u x z + D x 3 D z u x x x z + .
Expansion of Equation (19) yields
u x x x z Q u 2 α u t x Q u + β u y y Q u + 2 α u x u x z Q u + α u x x u z Q u D t ( u x x x z Q u t 2 α u t x Q u t + β u y y Q u t + 2 α u x u x z Q u t + α u x x u z Q u t ) D x ( u x x x z Q u x 2 α u t x Q u x + β u y y Q u x + 2 α u x u x z Q u x + α u x x u z Q u x ) D y ( u x x x z Q u y 2 α u t x Q u y + β u y y Q u y + 2 α u x u x z Q u y + α u x x u z Q u y ) D x ( 2 α u x z Q ) D t D x ( 2 α Q ) D y 2 ( β Q ) D x D z ( 2 α u x Q ) D x 2 ( α u z Q ) D z ( α u x x Q ) D x 3 D z ( Q ) = 0 ,
which, on applying the total derivatives D t , D x , D y , D z and splitting over the derivatives of u, yields the following simplified determining equations:
Q x = 0 , Q u = 0 , Q y y = 0 , Q z z = 0 , Q t u t = 0 , Q y u t = 0 , Q y u y = 0 , Q z u t = 0 , Q z u x = 0 , Q z u y = 0 , Q u t u t = 0 , Q u t u x = 0 , Q u t u y = 0 , 2 Q t u x Q z = 0 , Q u x u x = 0 , Q u y u y = 0 , α Q t u y β Q y u x = 0 , Q u x u y = 0 .
The solution of the above system of overdetermined equations is
Q = y z F t + 1 2 y u x F t + C 1 y u x + y G t + H t z + C 2 u t + 1 2 u x H t + C 3 u x + β u y 2 α F ( t ) + C 1 β t u y α + C 4 u y + J t ,
where F ( t ) , G ( t ) , H ( t ) , and J ( t ) are functions of t, whereas C 1 , C 2 , C 3 , and C 4 are arbitrary constants. The conservation laws are now obtained by using the divergence identity
D t T t + D x T x + D y T y + D z T z = Q ( u x x x z 2 α u t x + β u y y + 2 α u x u x z + α u z u x x ) ,
where T t is the conserved density, and T x , T y , T z are spatial fluxes. Thus, after some calculations, conservation laws corresponding to the eight multipliers are given below.
Case 1. For the first multiplier Q 1 = y u x + ( β t u y ) / α , the corresponding conservation law is given by
T 1 t = 1 2 α y u u x x 1 2 α y u x 2 + 1 2 β t u u x y 1 2 β t u x u y , T 1 x = 1 3 α y u u x u x z 1 3 β t u u x u y z 1 3 β t u u z u x y + 2 3 α y u x 2 u z + 2 3 β t u x u y u z 1 2 α y u u t x + 1 2 β t u u t y + 1 2 β y u u y y 1 2 α y u t u x 1 2 β t u t u y + 1 8 y u u x x x z 3 8 α β t u u x x y z + 1 2 β u u y + 5 8 y u x u x x z + 1 4 α β t u x u x y z 3 8 y u x x u x z 1 8 α β t u x x u y z + 1 8 y u z u x x x + 1 8 α β t u z u x x y + 3 8 α β t u y u x x z 1 4 α β t u x y u x z , T 1 y = 2 3 β u t u x u x z + 1 3 β u t u z u x x β t u u t x 1 2 β y u u x y 1 2 β u u x + 1 2 β y u x u y + 1 2 α β 2 t u y 2 + 1 2 α β t u u x x x z , T 1 z = 1 3 α y u u x u x x 1 3 β t u u x u x y + 1 3 α y u x 3 + 1 3 β t u x 2 u y 1 8 y u u x x x x 1 8 α β t u u x x x y + 1 4 y u x u x x x + 1 8 α β t u x u x x y 1 8 y u x x 2 1 8 α β t u x x u x y + 1 8 α β t u y u x x x .
Case 2. For the second multiplier Q 2 = u t , we obtain the corresponding conservation law as
T 2 t = 2 3 α u u x u x z + 1 3 α u u z u x x 1 2 α u u t x + 1 2 β u u y y + 1 2 u u x x x z 1 2 α u t u x , T 2 x = 1 3 α u u z u t x 1 3 α u u x u t z + 2 3 α u t u x u z + 1 2 α u u t t 1 2 α u t 2 3 8 u u t x x z + 1 8 u z u t x x + 1 4 u x u t x z + 3 8 u t u x x z 1 4 u t x u x z 1 8 u t z u x x , T 2 y = 1 2 β u u t y + 1 2 β u t u y , T 2 z = 1 3 α u t u x 2 1 3 α u u t x + 1 8 u x u t x x 1 8 u u t x x x + 1 8 u t u x x x 1 8 u t x u x x .
Case 3. For the second multiplier Q 3 = u x , we obtain the corresponding conservation law as
T 3 t = 1 2 α u u x y 1 2 α u x u y , T 3 x = 1 3 α u u x u x z + 2 3 α u x 2 u z 1 2 α u u t x 1 2 α u t u x + 5 8 u x u x x z + 1 2 β u u y y + 1 8 u u x x x z + 1 8 u z u x x x 3 8 u x x u x z , T 3 y = 1 2 β u u x y + 1 2 β u x u y , T 3 z = 1 3 α u x 3 1 3 α u u x u x x + 1 4 u x u x x x 1 8 u u x x x x 1 8 u x x 2 .
Case 4. For the multiplier Q 4 = u y , we obtain the corresponding conservation law as
T 4 t = 1 2 α u u x y 1 2 α u x u y , T 4 x = 1 3 α u u x u y z 1 3 α u u z u x y + 2 3 α u x u y u z + 1 2 α u u t y 1 2 α u t u y 3 8 u u x x y z 1 8 u x x u y z + 1 8 u z u x x y + 3 8 u y u x x z + 1 4 u x u x y z 1 4 u x y u x z , T 4 y = 2 3 α u u x u x z + 1 3 α u u z u x x α u u t x + 1 2 u u x x x z + 1 2 β u y 2 , T 4 z = 1 3 α u x 2 u y 1 3 α u u x u x y + 1 8 u x u x x y 1 8 u u x x x y + 1 8 u y u x x x 1 8 u x x u x y .
Case 5. For multiplier Q 5 = F ( t ) z + 1 2 F ( t ) y + 1 2 α β F ( t ) u y , we obtain the corresponding conservation law as
T 5 t = α F ( t ) y z u x + 1 4 α F ( t ) y u u x x 1 4 α F ( t ) y u x 2 + 1 4 β F ( t ) u u x y 1 4 β F ( t ) u x u y , T 5 x = 1 4 F ( t ) β y u u y y 1 6 β F ( t ) u u z u x y 1 6 β F ( t ) u u x u y z + 1 3 β F ( t ) u x u y u z 3 16 α β F ( t ) u u x x y z 1 16 α β F ( t ) u x x u y z 1 8 α β F ( t ) u x y u x z + 1 16 α β F ( t ) u z u x x y + 3 16 α β F ( t ) u y u x x z + 1 8 α β F ( t ) u x u x y z + α F ( t ) y z u 1 4 α F ( t ) y u u x α F ( t ) y z u t 1 4 α F ( t ) y u u t x + 1 3 α F ( t ) y u x 2 u z 1 4 α F ( t ) y u t u x 1 4 F ( t ) y u x x + α F ( t ) y z u x u z + 1 6 α F ( t ) y u u x u x z + 1 16 F ( t ) y u x x x z 3 16 F ( t ) y u x x u x z + 1 16 F ( t ) y u z u x x x + 5 16 F ( t ) y u x u x x z + 1 4 β F ( t ) u u y + 1 4 β F ( t ) u u t y 1 4 β F ( t ) u t u y + 3 4 F ( t ) y z u x x z , T 5 y = β F ( t ) y z u y β F ( t ) z u 1 4 β F ( t ) y u u x y + 1 4 β F ( t ) y u x u y 1 4 β F ( t ) u u x + 1 3 β F ( t ) u u x u x z + 1 6 β F ( t ) u u z u x x 1 2 β F ( t ) u u t x + 1 4 α β 2 F ( t ) u y 2 + 1 4 α β F ( t ) u u x x x z , T 5 z = 1 2 α F ( t ) y z u x 2 + 1 4 F ( t ) y z u x x x 1 6 α F ( t ) y u u x u x x + 1 6 α F ( t ) y u x 3 1 6 F ( t ) y u u x x x x + 1 8 F ( t ) y u x u x x x 1 16 F ( t ) y u x x 2 1 6 β F ( t ) u u x u x y + 1 6 β F ( t ) u x 2 u y 1 16 α β F ( t ) u u x x x y + 1 16 α β F ( t ) u x u x x y + 1 16 α β F ( t ) u y u x x x 1 16 α β F ( t ) u x x u x y .
Case 6. For the multiplier Q 6 = G ( t ) y , we obtain the corresponding conservation law as
T 6 t = α G ( t ) y u x , T 6 x = α G ( t ) y u + α G ( t ) y u x u z α G ( t ) y u t + 3 4 G ( t ) y u x x z , T 6 y = β ( G ( t ) z u y 1 4 β G ( t ) u u x y + 1 4 β G ( t ) u x u y , T 6 z = α G ( t ) y u + α G ( t ) y u x u z α G ( t ) y u t + 3 4 G ( t ) y u x x z .
Case 7. For the multiplier Q 7 = H ( t ) z + 1 2 H ( t ) u x , we obtain the corresponding conservation law as
T 7 t = α z u x H ( t ) + 1 4 α u u x x 1 4 α u x 2 H ( t ) , T 7 x = α z u H ( t ) + α z u x u z 1 4 α u u x α z u t + 3 4 z u x x z 1 4 u x x H ( t ) + 1 3 α u x 2 u z + 1 6 α u u x u x z 1 4 α u t u x 1 4 α u u t x + 5 16 u x u x x z + 1 4 β u u y y + 1 16 u u x x x z + 1 16 u z u x x x 3 16 u x x u x z H ( t ) , T 7 y = β H ( t ) z u y + 1 4 β u x u y 1 4 β u u x y H ( t ) , T 7 z = 1 2 α z u x 2 + 1 4 z u x x x H ( t ) + α 6 u x 3 α 6 u x u x x + 1 8 u x u x x x 1 6 u u x x x x 1 6 u x x 2 H ( t ) .
Case 8. For the last multiplier Q 8 = J ( t ) , we obtain the corresponding conservation law as
T 8 t = α u x J ( t ) , T 8 x = α J ( t ) u + α u x u z α u t + 3 4 u x x z J ( t ) , T 8 y = β u y J ( t ) , T 8 z = 1 2 α u x 2 + 1 4 u x x x J ( t ) .

3.2. Conservation Laws Using Noether’s Approach

In this subsection, we utilize Noether’s approach to derive consevation laws for the 3DgYTSF Equation (2). This equation is of fourth-order and it has a Lagrangian. It can be verified that Equation (2) has a second-order Lagrangian L given by
L = 1 2 u x x u x z β u y 2 α u x 2 u z + α u t u x
as δ L / δ u = 0 , on the Equation (2). Here, the Euler-Lagrange operator δ / δ u is given as in (20). The determining equation for Noether point symmetries is
X [ 2 ] ( L ) + L D t ( ξ 1 ) + D x ( ξ 2 ) + D y ( ξ 3 ) + D z ( ξ 4 ) D t ( B 1 ) D x ( B 2 ) D y ( B 3 ) D z ( B 4 ) = 0 ,
where gauge terms B 1 , B 2 , B 3 , and B 4 depend on t , x , y , z , and u. Here, X [ 2 ] is the second prolongation of the infinitesimal generator X and is defined by
X [ 2 ] = X + ζ 1 u t + ζ 2 u x + ζ 3 u y + ζ 4 u z + ζ 22 u x x + ζ 24 u x z .
Hence expanding Equation (22) with the Lagrangian L gives
α u x η t + u t η u u t ξ t 1 u t 2 ξ u 1 u x ξ t 2 u t u x ξ u 2 u y ξ t 3 u t u y ξ u 3 u z ξ t 4 u t u z ξ u 4 + α u t η x + u x η u u t ξ x 1 u t u x ξ u 1 u x ξ x 2 u x 2 ξ u 2 u y ξ x 3 u x u y ξ u 3 u z ξ x 4 u x u z ξ u 4 α u x u z η x + u x η u u t ξ x 1 u t u x ξ u 1 u x ξ x 2 u x 2 ξ u 2 u y ξ x 3 u x u y ξ u 3 u z ξ x 4 u x u z ξ u 4 β u y η y + u y η u u t ξ y 1 u t u y ξ u 1 u x ξ y 2 u x u y ξ u 2 u y ξ y 3 u y 2 ξ u 3 u z ξ y 4 u y u z ξ u 4 1 2 α u x 2 η z + u z η u u t ξ z 1 u t u z ξ u 1 u x ξ z 2 u x u z ξ u 2 u y ξ z 3 u y u z ξ u 3 u z ξ z 4 u z 2 ξ u 4 + 1 2 u x z η x x + 2 u x η x u + u x x ξ u 1 u x 2 ξ u u 1 2 u x x ξ x 2 2 u x 2 ξ x u 2 3 u x u x x ξ u 2 u x 3 ξ u u 2 2 u t x ξ x 1 u t ξ x x 1 2 u t u x ξ x u 1 u t u x x ξ u 1 2 u x u t x ξ u 1 u t u x 2 ξ u u 1 u x y ξ x 3 u x u x y ξ u 3 u x z ξ x 4 u x u x z ξ u 4 + 1 2 u x x η x z + u z η x u + u x η z u + u x u z η u u u t ξ x z 1 u t u z ξ x u 1 u t u x ξ z u 1 u t u x u z ξ u u 1 u x ξ x z 2 u x u z ξ x u 2 u x 2 ξ z u 2 u x 2 u z ξ u u 2 u y ξ x z 3 u y u z ξ x u 3 u x u y ξ z u 3 u x u y u z ξ u u 3 u z ξ x z 4 u z 2 ξ x u 4 u x u z ξ z u 4 u x u z 2 ξ u u 4 + u x z η u u t z ξ x 1 u x u t z ξ u 1 u t u x z ξ u 1 u x z ξ x 2 2 u x u x z ξ u 2 u y z ξ x 3 u x u y z ξ u 3 u y u x z ξ u 3 u z z ξ x 4 u z u x z ξ u 4 u x u z z ξ u 4 B t 1 u t B u 1 B x 2 u x B u 2 B y 3 u y B u 3 B z 4 u z B u 4 = 0 .
Splitting the above equation on derivatives of u yields the following system of overdetermined PDEs:
ξ u 1 = 0 , ξ u 2 = 0 , ξ u 3 = 0 , ξ u 4 = 0 , ξ y 4 = 0 , B u 4 = 0 , η x x = 0 , η x z = 0 , ξ x 1 = 0 , ξ x 3 = 0 , ξ z 3 = 0 , ξ x 4 = 0 , ξ z 1 = 0 , ξ z 2 = 0 , ξ x 4 = 0 , ξ y 1 = 0 , η u u = 0 , ξ x x 2 = 0 , η x u = 0 , η z u = 0 , 3 α ξ y 2 2 ξ t 3 = 0 , B u 2 2 η t = 0 , η x + ξ t 4 = 0 , B u 1 2 η x = 0 , η z + 2 ξ t 2 = 0 , B u 3 + 3 α η y = 0 , 2 η u + ξ y 3 + ξ z 4 = 0 , B t 1 + B x 2 + B y 3 + B z 4 = 0 , 3 η u + ξ t 1 ξ x 2 + ξ y 3 = 0 , 2 η u + ξ t 1 + 2 ξ x 2 + ξ y 3 = 0 , 2 η u + ξ t 1 + ξ x 2 ξ y 3 + ξ z 4 = 0
Solving the above overdetermined system of PDEs, we obtain the Noether symmetries and their gauge functions as follows:
X 1 = t , B t = 0 , B x = 0 , B y = 0 , B z = 0 , X 2 = x , B t = 0 , B x = 0 , B y = 0 , B z = 0 , X 3 = y , B t = 0 , B x = 0 , B y = 0 , B z = 0 , X 4 = z , B t = 0 , B x = 0 , B y = 0 , B z = 0 , X 5 = u , B t = 0 , B x = 0 , B y = 0 , B z = 0 , X 6 = y u , B t = 0 , B x = 0 , B y = 0 , B z = 0 , X 7 = 7 t t + 3 x x + 5 y y + z z 3 u u , B t = 0 , B x = 0 , B y = 0 , B z = 0 .
We now construct the conservation laws corresponding to each Noether point symmetry using [44]
T t = L ξ 1 + K 1 L u t B t , T x = L ξ 2 + K 1 L u x D x L u x x + K 2 L u x x + K 3 L u x z B x , T y = L ξ 3 + K 1 L u y B y , T z = L ξ 4 + K 1 L u z D x L u x z B z ,
where K 1 = η u t ξ 1 u x ξ 2 u y ξ 3 u z ξ 4 , K 2 = ζ 2 u x t ξ 1 u x x ξ 2 u x y ξ 3 u x z ξ 4 and K 3 = ζ 4 u t z ξ 1 u x z ξ 2 u y z ξ 3 u z z ξ 4 . Hence, using Formulae (24), we obtain the conserved vectors whose components are
T 1 t = 1 2 u x x u x z 3 2 α u y 2 u x 2 u z , T 1 x = 2 u t u x u z + 3 4 u t u x x z 1 4 u x x u t z 1 2 u t x u x z 2 u t 2 , T 1 y = 3 α u t u y , T 1 z = u t u x 2 + 1 4 u t u x x x 1 4 u x x u t x ; T 2 t = 2 u x 2 , T 2 x = u x 2 u z 1 4 u x x u x z + 3 4 u x u x x z 3 2 α u y 2 , T 2 y = 3 α u x u y , T 2 z = u x 3 + 1 4 u x x x u x 1 4 u x x 2 ; T 3 t = 2 u x u y , T 3 x = 2 u t u y + 2 u x u y u z 1 2 u x y u x z 1 4 u x x u y z + 3 4 u y u x x z , T 3 y = 2 u t u x u x 2 u z + 1 2 u x x u x z + 3 2 α u y 2 , T 3 z = u x 2 u y 1 4 u x x u x y + 1 4 u x x x u y T 4 t = 2 u x u z , T 4 x = 2 u t u z + 2 u x u z 2 + 3 4 u z u x x z 1 2 u x z 2 1 4 u x x u z z , T 4 y = 3 α u y u z , T 4 z = 2 u t u x + 1 4 u x x u x z + 1 4 u x x x u z 3 2 α u y 2
T 5 t = 2 u x , T 5 x = 2 u t 2 u x u z 3 4 u x x z , T 5 y = 3 α u y , T 5 z = u x 2 1 4 u x x x T 6 t = 2 y u x , T 6 x = 2 y u t 2 y u x u z 3 4 y u x x z , T 6 y = 3 α y u y , T 6 z = y u x 2 1 4 y u x x x ; T 7 t = 7 2 t u x x u x z 21 2 α t u y 2 7 t u x 2 u 6 u u x 6 x u x 2 10 y u x u y 2 z u x u z , T 7 x = 9 2 α x u y 2 + 3 x u x 2 u z 6 u u t 14 t u t 2 10 y u t u y 2 z u t u z + 6 u u t u z + 14 t u t u x u z + 10 y u x u y u z + 2 z u x u z 2 + 3 2 u u x x x z + 7 2 t u t u x x z + 3 2 x u x u x x z + 5 2 y u y u x x z + 1 2 z u z u x x z 3 u x u x z 7 2 t u t x u x z 5 2 y u x y u x z 2 u x x u z 7 2 t u t z u x x 3 2 x u x x u x z 5 2 u x x u [ y z ] 1 2 z u x x u z z , T 7 y = 10 y u t u x + 5 2 y u x x u x z + 15 2 α y u y 2 5 y u x 2 u z + 9 α u u y + 21 α t u t u y + 9 α x u x u y + 3 α z u y u z , T 7 z = 2 z u t u x + 1 2 z u x x u x z 3 2 α z u y 2 + 3 u u x 2 + 7 t u t u x 2 + 3 x u x 3 + 5 y u x 2 u y + 3 2 u u x x x + 7 2 t u t u x x x + 3 2 x u x u x x x + 5 2 y u y u x x x + 1 2 z u z u x x x .

4. Conclusions

In this paper, we studied the fourth-order three-dimensional generalized potential Yu-Toda-Sasa-Fukuyama (gpYTSF) Equation (2). We first determined its Lie point symmetries and then presented the corresponding group of transformations. These Lie symmetries were then used to perform symmetry reductions, and as a result reduced ordinary differential equations were obtained. The ordinary differential equations were then solved using direct integration and exact solutions of gpYTSF equation were obtained. The group invariant solutions obtained included a solution in terms of incomplete elliptic integral. It should be noted that the solutions obtained in this paper are new and different from the ones presented in the literature. Moreover, conservation laws for the gpYTSF equation were constructed by employing two different approaches; the multiplier approach and Noether’s approach. The multiplier approach provided us with eight conservation law multipliers which resulted in eight conservation laws, whereas the Noether’s theorem yielded seven conservation laws. This is the first time that conservation laws have been derived for Equation (2). These conservation laws included the conservation of mass and energy.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, C.M.K., K.P. and O.L.D.; Methodology, C.M.K. and K.P.; Software, K.P. and O.L.D.; Validation, C.M.K.; Writing—original draft, K.P. and O.L.D.; Writing—review & editing, C.M.K. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank North-West University, Mafikeng campus for its continued support and thank the reviewers for their suggestions which improved the presentation of the paper.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Zhang, Z. Jacobi elliptic function expansion method for the modified Korteweg-de Vries-Zakharov-Kuznetsov and the Hirota equations. Phys. Lett. A 2001, 289, 69–74. [Google Scholar]
  2. Wang, M.; Zhou, Y.; Li, Z. Application of a homogeneous balance method to exact solutions of nonlinear equations in mathematical physics. Phys. Lett. A 1996, 216, 67–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Kudryashov, N.A. One method for finding exact solutions of nonlinear differential equations. Commun. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Simul. 2012, 17, 2248–2253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Hu, J.; Zhang, H. A new method for finding exact traveling wave solutions to nonlinear partial differential equations. Phys. Lett. A 2001, 286, 175–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Ablowitz, M.J.; Clarkson, P.A. Solitons, Nonlinear Evolution Equations and Inverse Scattering; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 1991. [Google Scholar]
  6. Gu, C.H. Soliton Theory and Its Application; Zhejiang Science and Technology Press: Hangzhou, China, 1990. [Google Scholar]
  7. Matveev, V.B.; Salle, M.A. Darboux Transformations and Solitons; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 1991. [Google Scholar]
  8. Hirota, R. The Direct Method in Soliton Theory; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2004. [Google Scholar]
  9. Wang, M.; Li, X.; Zhang, J. The (G/G)-expansion method and travelling wave solutions for linear evolution equations in mathematical physics. Phys. Lett. A 2008, 372, 417–423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Ovsiannikov, L.V. Group Analysis of Differential Equations; Academic Press: New York, NY, USA, 1982. [Google Scholar]
  11. Bluman, G.W.; Kumei, S. Symmetries and Differential Equations; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 1989. [Google Scholar]
  12. Olver, P.J. Applications of Lie Groups to Differential Equations, 2nd ed.; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 1993. [Google Scholar]
  13. Ibragimov, N.H. CRC Handbook of Lie Group Analysis of Differential Equations; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 1994; Volumes 1–3. [Google Scholar]
  14. Ibragimov, N.H. Elementary Lie Group Analysis and Ordinary Differential Equations; John Wiley & Sons: Chichester, NY, USA, 1999. [Google Scholar]
  15. Simbanefayi, I.; Khalique, C.M. Travelling wave solutions and conservation laws for the Korteweg-de Vries-Bejamin-Bona-Mahony equation. Results Phys. 2018, 8, 57–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Noether, E. Invariante variationsprobleme. Nachr. v. d. Ges. d. Wiss. zu Göttingen. Math.-Phys. Klasse 1918, 2, 235–257. [Google Scholar]
  17. Ibragimov, N.H. A new conservation theorem. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 2007, 333, 311–328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Leveque, R.J. Numerical Methods for Conservation Laws, 2nd ed.; Birkhäuser-Verlag: Basel, Switzerland, 1992. [Google Scholar]
  19. Mikhailov, A.V.; Shabat, A.B.; Yamilov, R.I. On an extension of the module of invertible transformations. Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR 1987, 295, 288–291. [Google Scholar]
  20. Mikhailov, A.V.; Shabat, A.B.; Yamilov, R.I. Extension of the module of invertible transformations and classification of integrable systems. Commun. Math. Phys. 1988, 115, 1–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Sjöberg, A. Double reduction of PDEs from the association of symmetries with conservation laws with applications. Appl. Math. Comput. 2007, 84, 608–616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Sjöberg, A. On double reductions from symmetries and conservation laws. Nonlinear Anal. Real World Appl. 2009, 10, 3472–3477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Bluman, G.W.; Cheviakov, A.F.; Anco, S.C. Applications of Symmetry Methods to Partial Differential Equations; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  24. Yasar, E.; Özer, T. On symmetries, conservations laws and similarity solutions of foam drainage equation. Int. J. Non-Linear Mech. 2011, 46, 357–362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Polat, G.G.; Orhan, Ö.; Özer, T. On new conservation laws of fin equation. Adv. Math. Phys. 2014, 695408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Leach, P.G.L. Lie symmetries and Noether symmetries. Appl. Anal. Discrete Math. 2012, 6, 238–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Mei, F.X.; Zheng, G.H. On the Noether symmetry and Lie symmetry of mechanical systems. Acta Mech. Sin. 2002, 18, 414–419. [Google Scholar]
  28. Yu, S.J.; Toda, K.; Sasa, N.; Fukuyama, T. N soliton solutions to the Bogoyavlenskii-Schiff equation and a quest for the soliton solution in (3 + 1) dimensions. J. Phys. A Math. Gen. 1998, 31, 3337–3347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Yan, Z. New families of nontravelling wave solutions to a new (3 + 1)-dimensional potential-YTSF equation. Phys. Lett. A 2003, 318, 78–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Zeng, X.; Dai, Z.; Li, D. New periodic soliton solutions for the (3 + 1)-dimensional potential-YTSF equation. Chaos Solitons Fractals 2009, 42, 657–661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Wang, Y.P. Solving the (3 + 1)-dimensional potential-YTSF equation with Exp-function method. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 2008, 96, 012186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Darvishi, M.T.; Najafi, M. A modification of extended homoclinic test approach to solve the (3 + 1)-dimensional potential-YTSF equation. Chin. Phys. Lett. 2011, 28, 040202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Cimpoiasu, R. Multiple invariant solutions of the 3D potential Yu-Toda-Sasa-Fukuyama equation via symmetry technique. Int. J. Mod. Phys. B 2020, 34, 2050188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Huang, L.; Manafian, J.; Singh, G.; Nisar, K.S.; Nasution, M.K.M. New lump and interaction soliton, N-soliton solutions and the LSP for the (3+1)-D potential-YTSF-like equation. Results Phys. 2021, 29, 104713. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Plaatjie, K.; Khalique, C.M. On the solutions and conservation laws of the Yu–Toda–Sasa–Fukuyama equation of plasma physics. Results Phys. 2021, 29, 104706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Ma, H.; Cheng, Q. A Deng N-soliton solutions and localized wave interaction solutions of a (3 + 1)-dimensional potential-Yu–Toda–Sasa–Fukuyama equation. Mod. Phys. Lett. B 2021, 35, 2150277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Dong, M.J.; Tian, S.F.; Wang, X.B.; Zhang, T.T. Lump-type solutions and interaction solutions in the (3 + 1)-dimensional potential Yu-Toda-Sasa-Fukuyama equation. Anal. Math. Phys. 2019, 9, 1511–1523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Li, Z.Q.; Tian, S.F.; Wang, H.; Yang, J.J.; Zhang, T.T. Characteristics of the lump, lumpoff and rouge wave solutions in a (3 + 1)-dimensional generalized potential Yu-Toda-Sasa-Fukuyama equation. Mod. Phys. Lett. 2019, 33, 1950291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Jadaun, V.; Singh, N.R. Soliton solutions of generalized (3 + 1)-dimensional Yu-Toda-Sasa-Fukuyama equation using Lie symmetry analysis. Anal. Math. Phys. 2020, 10, 42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Billing, J.; King, A.C. Wave Motion; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2000. [Google Scholar]
  41. Kudryashov, N.A. Analytical Theory of Nonlinear Differential Equations; Institute of Computer Investigations: Moskow/Igevsk, Russia, 2004. [Google Scholar]
  42. Abramowitz, M.; Stegun, I. Handbook of Mathematical Functions; Institute of Computer Science: Moscow/Izhevsk, Russia, 2004. [Google Scholar]
  43. Gradshteyn, I.S.; Ryzhik, I.M. Table of Integration, Series, and Products, 7th ed.; Academic Press: New York, NY, USA, 2007. [Google Scholar]
  44. Sarlet, W. Comment on ‘Conservation laws of higher order nonlinear PDEs and the variational conservation laws in the class with mixed derivatives’. J. Phys. A Math. Theor. 2010, 43, 458001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. The 3D and 2D solution profile of (14).
Figure 1. The 3D and 2D solution profile of (14).
Symmetry 13 02058 g001
Figure 2. The 3D and 2D solution profile of (16) with M = cos z / t 3 , K = sec h ( z / t 3 ) .
Figure 2. The 3D and 2D solution profile of (16) with M = cos z / t 3 , K = sec h ( z / t 3 ) .
Symmetry 13 02058 g002
Figure 3. The 3D and 2D solution profile of (16) with M = sec h z / t 3 , K = cos z / t 3 .
Figure 3. The 3D and 2D solution profile of (16) with M = sec h z / t 3 , K = cos z / t 3 .
Symmetry 13 02058 g003
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Khalique, C.M.; Plaatjie, K.; Diteho, O.L. Symmetry Solutions and Conservation Laws for the 3D Generalized Potential Yu-Toda-Sasa-Fukuyama Equation of Mathematical Physics. Symmetry 2021, 13, 2058. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym13112058

AMA Style

Khalique CM, Plaatjie K, Diteho OL. Symmetry Solutions and Conservation Laws for the 3D Generalized Potential Yu-Toda-Sasa-Fukuyama Equation of Mathematical Physics. Symmetry. 2021; 13(11):2058. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym13112058

Chicago/Turabian Style

Khalique, Chaudry Masood, Karabo Plaatjie, and Oageng Lawrence Diteho. 2021. "Symmetry Solutions and Conservation Laws for the 3D Generalized Potential Yu-Toda-Sasa-Fukuyama Equation of Mathematical Physics" Symmetry 13, no. 11: 2058. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym13112058

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop