Next Article in Journal
Crowdsourced Street-Level Imagery as a Potential Source of In-Situ Data for Crop Monitoring
Previous Article in Journal
Regional Socioeconomic Changes Affecting Rural Area Livelihoods and Atlantic Forest Transitions
Previous Article in Special Issue
From Town to Countryside: Middle-Byzantine Bath-Houses in Eastern Crete and Their Changing Functions
Article Menu

Export Article

Open AccessArticle
Land 2018, 7(4), 126; https://doi.org/10.3390/land7040126

Timacum Minus in Moesia Superior—Centrality and Urbanism at a Roman Mining Settlement

Institute for Classical Archaeology, University of Vienna, Franz-Klein-Gasse 1, 1190 Vienna, Austria
Received: 16 September 2018 / Revised: 17 October 2018 / Accepted: 19 October 2018 / Published: 22 October 2018
Full-Text   |   PDF [3354 KB, uploaded 22 October 2018]   |  

Abstract

When applying traditional criteria of Roman urbanism, several settlements in the province of Moesia are not recognised as parts of the urban network. To avoid this, previous criteria of urbanism should be revised. This paper suggests revisions, which provide a more inclusive definition of urbanism: Thus, instead of focusing on administrative status and monumentality as primary markers of urbanity and urbanization, development factors for agglomeration and centrality are emphasized as decisive conditions for, and characteristics of, urban settlement. To provide a case study for this theoretical outline, the upper-Moesian mining settlement of Timacum Minus is evaluated by ideas derived from a critical appreciation of Walter Christaller’s central place theory. Timacum Minus did not have official settlement status and monumental character, yet, it developed as a central place in the unique landscape of the Timok valley. This was due to its location as a central road station, military post, and settlement along the important interregional Timok valley road as well as the site hierarchy as the base of the centralized administration of the Timok valley mining district. Hence, Timacum Minus displays different levels of centrality. Interestingly, the site only held these properties during the Roman Principate, although its central location and mining activities also existed in pre-Roman and post-Roman times. This demonstrates the significance of centrality mechanisms as determined by local and regional circumstances and historical conditions. Accordingly, it is argued that these circumstances and the diverse character as a central place also turned Timacum Minus into an urban site, irrespective of status and monumentality. This definition of the site provides not only an example of how to use central place theory in current archaeological thought but also possibilities for re-thinking urbanism in Roman Moesia. View Full-Text
Keywords: Timacum Minus; Moesia Superior; central place theory; centrality; Roman urbanism; settlement status; Roman mining Timacum Minus; Moesia Superior; central place theory; centrality; Roman urbanism; settlement status; Roman mining
Figures

Figure 1

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited (CC BY 4.0).
SciFeed

Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Diers, L. Timacum Minus in Moesia Superior—Centrality and Urbanism at a Roman Mining Settlement. Land 2018, 7, 126.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics

1

Comments

[Return to top]
Land EISSN 2073-445X Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top