Next Article in Journal
A GeoDetector–MGWR Framework for Place-Based Cultural Heritage Strategies: Evidence from the Chungcheong Region, South Korea
Previous Article in Journal
Temporal–Spatial Evolution and Formation Mechanism of Cultural Landscapes in Poetry: The Case of Yangtze River National Cultural Park in Hubei Province
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Regional Cartography as Planning Infrastructure: Implications for Spatial Planning and Governance

by
Dimitris Kourkouridis
1,* and
Asimenia Salepaki
2
1
School of Spatial Planning and Development, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 54124 Thessaloniki, Greece
2
Business and Exhibition Research and Development Institute, 54636 Thessaloniki, Greece
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Land 2026, 15(3), 381; https://doi.org/10.3390/land15030381
Submission received: 30 January 2026 / Revised: 25 February 2026 / Accepted: 25 February 2026 / Published: 27 February 2026
(This article belongs to the Section Land Planning and Landscape Architecture)

Abstract

Regional cartography has traditionally supported the representation and organization of territorial space; however, its role within contemporary spatial planning and governance systems has evolved alongside the growing emphasis on evidence-based and multi-level governance. This paper examines how regional cartographic frameworks are integrated into spatial planning processes and how they contribute to coordination, monitoring, and implementation capacity. The study adopts a qualitative research design based on systematic document analysis of key European and national planning and policy documents, using an analytical framework that conceptualizes cartography as a structural component of planning and governance systems. The findings indicate that, although cartographic tools, spatial indicators, and territorial monitoring instruments are widely employed, particularly within European analytical initiatives, their institutional integration within planning frameworks remains limited and uneven. Cartography is primarily positioned as an analytical or communicative resource rather than as a binding element of planning architecture. Drawing on the Greek planning experience within a broader European context, the paper concludes that strengthening the institutional embedding of regional cartography as a planning infrastructure may contribute to improved monitoring, multi-level coordination, and a more coherent translation of strategic objectives into spatial policy frameworks.
Keywords: regional cartography; spatial planning; multi-level governance; planning infrastructure; territorial monitoring regional cartography; spatial planning; multi-level governance; planning infrastructure; territorial monitoring

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Kourkouridis, D.; Salepaki, A. Regional Cartography as Planning Infrastructure: Implications for Spatial Planning and Governance. Land 2026, 15, 381. https://doi.org/10.3390/land15030381

AMA Style

Kourkouridis D, Salepaki A. Regional Cartography as Planning Infrastructure: Implications for Spatial Planning and Governance. Land. 2026; 15(3):381. https://doi.org/10.3390/land15030381

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kourkouridis, Dimitris, and Asimenia Salepaki. 2026. "Regional Cartography as Planning Infrastructure: Implications for Spatial Planning and Governance" Land 15, no. 3: 381. https://doi.org/10.3390/land15030381

APA Style

Kourkouridis, D., & Salepaki, A. (2026). Regional Cartography as Planning Infrastructure: Implications for Spatial Planning and Governance. Land, 15(3), 381. https://doi.org/10.3390/land15030381

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop