Abstract
Rapid urban growth in South Indian coastal cities such as Chennai has intensified the Urban Heat Island (UHI) effect, with paved parking lots, walkways, and open spaces acting as major heat reservoirs. This study specifically compares conventional construction materials with natural and low-thermal-inertia alternatives to evaluate their relative ability to mitigate Surface Urban Heat Island (SUHI) effects. Unlike previous studies that examine isolated materials or single seasons, this pilot provides a unified, multi-season comparison of nine urban surfaces, offering new evidence on their comparative cooling performance. To assess practical mitigation strategies, a field pilot was conducted using nine surface types commonly employed in the region—concrete, interlocking tiles, parking tiles, white cooling tiles, white-painted concrete, natural grass, synthetic turf, barren soil, and a novel 10% coconut-shell biochar concrete. The rationale of this comparison is to evaluate how conventional, reflective, vegetated, and low-thermal-inertia surfaces differ in their capacity to reduce surface heating, thereby identifying practical, material-based strategies for SUHI mitigation in tropical cities. Surface temperatures were measured at four times of day (pre-dawn, noon, sunset, night) across three months (winter, transition, summer). Results revealed sharp noon-time contrasts: synthetic turf and barren soil peaked above 45–70 °C in summer, while reflective coatings and natural grass remained 25–35 °C cooler. High thermal-mass materials such as concrete and interlocked tiles retained heat into the evening, whereas grass and reflective tiles cooled rapidly, lowering late-day and nocturnal heat loads. Biochar concrete performed thermally similarly to conventional concrete but offered co-benefits of ~10% cement reduction, carbon sequestration, and sustainable reuse of locally abundant coconut shell waste.