Next Article in Journal
Comprehensive Evaluation of Land Use Benefit in the Yellow River Basin from 1995 to 2018
Next Article in Special Issue
Maintaining the Many Societal Benefits of Rangelands: The Case of Hawaiʻi
Previous Article in Journal
A Proposal for Streamlining 3D Digital Cadastral Data Lifecycle
Previous Article in Special Issue
Modeling Integrated Impacts of Climate Change and Grazing on Mongolia’s Rangelands
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Assessing Controversial Desertification Prevention Policies in Ecologically Fragile and Deeply Impoverished Areas: A Case Study of Marginal Parts of the Taklimakan Desert, China

1
School of Land Science and Technology, China University of Geosciences (Beijing), Beijing 100083, China
2
Key Laboratory of Land Consolidation and Rehabilitation, Ministry of Natural Resources, Beijing 100083, China
3
Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China
4
College of Environmental Science and Engineering, Tianjin University, Tianjin 30072, China
5
China Geo-Engineering Corporation, Beijing 100093, China
6
Tourism College, Beijing Union University, Beijing 100101, China
7
Land Consolidation and Rehabilitation Center, Ministry of Natural Resources, Beijing 100812, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Land 2021, 10(6), 641; https://doi.org/10.3390/land10060641
Submission received: 12 May 2021 / Revised: 6 June 2021 / Accepted: 11 June 2021 / Published: 16 June 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Sustainable Rangeland Management to Protect Habitat and Livelihoods)

Abstract

Overgrazing plays an important role in the grassland desertification in global drylands. The effectiveness of policies related to grazing directly affects efforts to combat desertification and sustainable rangeland management. However, there remain questions around how the interplay of grassland desertification and poverty affects the implementation of policies. To reveal the effectiveness of the desertification prevention policy that delineates national key ecological function areas (NKEFAs), the main objective was to perform a sustainability assessment and on-site investigation in Northwest China. A parallel index system, which integrates the indices for economic input–output and material supply–demand to represent sustainability, and the indices for interview records from managers and questionnaires from residents to represent the effectiveness of NKEFA policy, was proposed to comprehensively judge the performance of NKEFA policy, and the underlying causes behind undesirable effects were further analyzed. The results indicate that (1) the performance of desertification control policy is related to socioeconomic conditions—a few counties with increased socioeconomic and land resource sustainability (SLS) are peri-urban or resource-rich; (2) the fact that the socioeconomic benefits of the NKEFA policy are not obvious to impoverished farmers greatly reduces their enthusiasm for preventing desertification; and (3) the livelihood needs and defective ecological compensation force residents with underdeveloped comprehensive quality to overdevelop or use grassland resources even though they have received subsidies for conserving grassland. It is concluded that poverty and grassland desertification interact to influence potential policy performance. Our analysis can help decision makers to formulate desertification control policies with multiple goals to achieve sustainable performance in an economy–ecology system.
Keywords: grassland desertification; ecological compensation; national key ecological functional area; poverty; sustainability grassland desertification; ecological compensation; national key ecological functional area; poverty; sustainability

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Liu, S.; Zhang, J.; Zhang, J.; Li, Z.; Geng, Y.; Guo, Y. Assessing Controversial Desertification Prevention Policies in Ecologically Fragile and Deeply Impoverished Areas: A Case Study of Marginal Parts of the Taklimakan Desert, China. Land 2021, 10, 641. https://doi.org/10.3390/land10060641

AMA Style

Liu S, Zhang J, Zhang J, Li Z, Geng Y, Guo Y. Assessing Controversial Desertification Prevention Policies in Ecologically Fragile and Deeply Impoverished Areas: A Case Study of Marginal Parts of the Taklimakan Desert, China. Land. 2021; 10(6):641. https://doi.org/10.3390/land10060641

Chicago/Turabian Style

Liu, Shidong, Jianjun Zhang, Jie Zhang, Zheng Li, Yuhuan Geng, and Yiqiang Guo. 2021. "Assessing Controversial Desertification Prevention Policies in Ecologically Fragile and Deeply Impoverished Areas: A Case Study of Marginal Parts of the Taklimakan Desert, China" Land 10, no. 6: 641. https://doi.org/10.3390/land10060641

APA Style

Liu, S., Zhang, J., Zhang, J., Li, Z., Geng, Y., & Guo, Y. (2021). Assessing Controversial Desertification Prevention Policies in Ecologically Fragile and Deeply Impoverished Areas: A Case Study of Marginal Parts of the Taklimakan Desert, China. Land, 10(6), 641. https://doi.org/10.3390/land10060641

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop