Overview of the Korean Precipitation Observation Program (KPOP) in the Seoul Metropolitan Area
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Overview of Observations
2.1. Implementation of the Intensive Observation Program in the Seoul Metropolitan Area
2.2. Operations of Supersite Observation
2.3. International Collaborative Observation
3. Preliminary Analysis of Results Based on the Metropolitan Intensive Observation Network
3.1. Analysis of a Summer Heavy Rainfall Event
3.2. Study on the Use of Intensive Observation Data for Data Assimilation
4. Discussion and Conclusions
4.1. Discussion: Added Value of Intensive Observations in an Urban Coastal Environment
4.2. Discussion: Impact of Intensive Observation Data on Data Assimilation
4.3. Conclusions and Future Perspectives
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Kim, H.-R.; Moon, M.; Yun, J.; Ha, K.-J. Trends and Spatio-Temporal Variability of Summer Mean and Extreme Precipitation across South Korea for 1973–2022. Asia-Pac. J. Atmos. Sci. 2023, 59, 385–398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Jin, H.-G.; Baik, J.-J. Detection of Urban Effects on Precipitation in the Seoul Metropolitan Area, South Korea. Urban Clim. 2024, 53, 101773. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Oh, H.; Ha, K.-J.; Jeong, J.-Y. Identifying Dynamic and Thermodynamic Contributions to the Record-Breaking 2022 Summer Extreme Rainfall Events in Korea. Asia-Pac. J. Atmos. Sci. 2024, 60, 387–399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, J.; Gao, S.; Shen, X.; Xu, D.; Ren, F. The Characteristics of Mesoscale Convective Systems (MCSs) over East Asia in Warm Seasons. Atmos. Ocean. Sci. Lett. 2012, 5, 269–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, H.H.; Park, S.K. Current Status of Intensive Observing Period and Development Direction. Atmosphere 2008, 18, 147–158. [Google Scholar]
- Hwang, Y.-J.; Ha, J.-C.; Kim, Y.-H.; Kim, K.-H.; Jeon, E.-H.; Chang, D.-E. Observing System Experiments Using KLAPS and 3DVAR for the Upper-Air Observations over the South and West Sea during ProbeX-2009. Atmosphere 2011, 21, 1–16. [Google Scholar]
- Kim, K.; Bang, W.; Chang, E.-C.; Tapiador, F.J.; Tsai, C.-L.; Jung, E.; Lee, G. Impact of Wind Pattern and Complex Topography on Snow Microphysics during ICE-POP 2018. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 2021, 21, 11955–11978. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Stoelinga, M.T.; Hobbs, P.V.; Mass, C.F.; Locatelli, J.D.; Colle, B.A.; Houze, R.A.; Rangno, A.L.; Bond, N.A.; Smull, B.F.; Rasmussen, R.M.; et al. Improvement of Microphysical Parameterization through Observational Verification Experiment. Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 2003, 84, 1807–1826. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Houze, R.A.; McMurdie, L.A.; Petersen, W.A.; Schwaller, M.R.; Baccus, W.; Lundquist, J.D.; Mass, C.F.; Nijssen, B.; Rutledge, S.A.; Hudak, D.R.; et al. The Olympic Mountains Experiment (OLYMPEX). Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 2017, 98, 2167–2188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- McMurdie, L.A.; Heymsfield, G.M.; Yorks, J.E.; Braun, S.A.; Skofronick-Jackson, G.; Rauber, R.M.; Yuter, S.; Colle, B.; McFarquhar, G.M.; Poellot, M.; et al. Chasing Snowstorms: The Investigation of Microphysics and Precipitation for Atlantic Coast-Threatening Snowstorms (IMPACTS) Campaign. Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 2022, 103, E1243–E1269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, S.-C.; Chen, S.-H.; Liu, L.J.-Y.; Yeh, H.-L.; Chang, W.-Y.; Chung, K.-S.; Chang, P.-L.; Lee, W.-C. Investigating the Mechanisms of an Intense Coastal Rainfall Event during TAHOPE/PRECIP-IOP3 Using a Multiscale Radar Ensemble Data Assimilation System. Mon. Weather Rev. 2024, 152, 2545–2567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bell, M.M.; DeHart, J.C.; Nam, C.C.; Cha, T.Y.; Yang, M.J. Microphysics of Heavy Rainfall Observed during the Prediction of Rainfall Extremes Campaign in the Pacific (PRECIP). In Proceedings of the 40th Conference on Radar Meteorology, Minneapolis, MN, USA, 28 August–1 September 2023; American Meteorological Society: Boston, MA, USA. Available online: https://ams.confex.com/ams/40RADAR/webprogram/Paper426298.html (accessed on 9 December 2025).
- Nam, C.C.; Chai, D.S.; Kim, K.; Shin, S.S.H.; Lee, Y.; Park, H.; Kang, H.-S.; Lee, Y.-H.; Park, S.-H.; Lee, G. How to Maximize the Educational Benefits for Students Participating in a Meteorological Field Campaign. Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 2025, accepted. [Google Scholar]
- Löffler-Mang, M.; Joss, J. An Optical Disdrometer for Measuring Size and Velocity of Hydrometeors. J. Atmos. Ocean. Technol. 2000, 17, 130–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kruger, A.; Krajewski, W.F. Two-Dimensional Video Disdrometer: A Description. J. Atmos. Ocean. Technol. 2002, 19, 602–617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rasmussen, R.; Baker, B.; Kochendorfer, J.; Meyers, T.; Landolt, S.; Fischer, A.P.; Black, J.; Thériault, J.M.; Kucera, P.; Gochis, D.; et al. How Well Are We Measuring Snow? The NOAA/FAA/NCAR Winter Precipitation Test Bed. Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 2012, 93, 811–829. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dolan, B.; Rutledge, S.A. A Theory-Based Hydrometeor Identification Algorithm for X-Band Polarimetric Radar. J. Atmos. Ocean. Technol. 2009, 26, 2071–2088. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kollias, P.; Clothiaux, E.E.; Miller, M.A.; Albrecht, B.A.; Stephens, G.L.; Ackerman, T.P. Millimeter-Wavelength Radars—New Frontier in Atmospheric Cloud and Precipitation Research. Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 2007, 88, 1608–1624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Peters, G.; Fischer, B.; Andersson, T. Rain Observations with a Vertically Looking Micro Rain Radar (MRR). Boreal Environ. Res. 2002, 7, 353–362. [Google Scholar]
- Pearson, G.; Davies, F.; Collier, C. An Analysis of the Performance of the UFAM Pulsed Doppler Lidar for Observing the Boundary Layer. J. Atmos. Ocean. Technol. 2009, 26, 240–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Spuler, S.M.; Repasky, K.S.; Morley, B.; Moen, D.; Hayman, M.; Nehrir, A.R. Field-Deployable Diode-Laser-Based Differential Absorption Lidar (DIAL) for Profiling Water Vapor. Atmos. Meas. Tech. 2015, 8, 1073–1087. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Weckwerth, T.M.; Weber, K.J.; Turner, D.D.; Spuler, S.M. Validation of a Water Vapor Micropulse Differential Absorption Lidar (DIAL). J. Atmos. Ocean. Technol. 2016, 33, 2353–2372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rutledge, S.A.; Chandrasekar, V.; Fuchs, B.; George, J.; Junyent, F.; Dolan, B.; Kennedy, P.C.; Drushka, K. SEA-POL Goes to Sea. Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 2019, 100, 2285–2301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Barker, D.M.; Huang, W.; Guo, Y.-R.; Bourgeois, A.J.; Xiao, Q.N. A Three-Dimensional Variational Data Assimilation System for MM5: Implementation and Initial Results. Mon. Weather Rev. 2004, 132, 897–914. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Han, J.Y.; Hong, S.Y.; Lim, K.S.S.; Han, J. Sensitivity of a Cumulus Parameterization Scheme to Precipitation Production Representation and Its Impact on a Heavy Rain Event over Korea. Mon. Weather Rev. 2016, 144, 2125–2135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jang, S.; Lim, K.S.S.; Ko, J.; Kim, K.; Lee, G.; Cho, S.J.; Ahn, K.D.; Lee, Y.H. Revision of WDM7 Microphysics Scheme and Evaluation for Precipitating Convection over the Korean Peninsula. Remote Sens. 2021, 13, 3860. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Han, J.-Y. Impact of Different Scale-Aware Cumulus Parameterizations on Precipitation Forecasts over Korea. Atmos. Res. 2025, 317, 107990. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zheng, Y.; Alapaty, K.; Herwehe, J.A.; Del Genio, A.D.; Niyogi, D. Improving High-Resolution Weather Forecasts Using the Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) Model with an Updated Kain–Fritsch Scheme. Mon. Weather Rev. 2016, 144, 833–860. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jeworrek, J.; West, G.; Stull, R. Evaluation of Cumulus and Microphysics Parameterizations in WRF across the Convective Gray Zone. Weather Forecast. 2019, 34, 1097–1115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, X.; Xue, M.; Zhou, B.; Fang, J.A.; Zhang, J.; Marks, F.D. Effect of Scale-Aware Planetary Boundary Layer Schemes on Tropical Cyclone Intensification and Structural Changes in the Gray Zone: Comparison between the Shin-Hong (SH) and YSU Schemes. Mon. Weather Rev. 2021, 149, 2079–2095. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jiménez, P.A.; Dudhia, J.; González-Rouco, J.F.; Navarro, J.; Montávez, J.P.; García-Bustamante, E. A Revised Scheme for the WRF Surface Layer Formulation. Mon. Weather Rev. 2012, 140, 898–918. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hua, W.; Dong, X.; Liu, Q.; Zhou, L.; Chen, H.; Sun, S. High-Resolution WRF Simulation of Extreme Heat Events in Eastern China: Large Sensitivity to Land Surface Schemes. Front. Earth Sci. 2021, 9, 770826. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Iacono, M.J.; Delamere, J.S.; Mlawer, E.J.; Shephard, M.W.; Clough, S.A.; Collins, W.D. Radiative Forcing by Long-Lived 0Greenhouse Gases: Calculations with the AER Radiative Transfer Models. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 2008, 113, D13103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, C.-Y.; Yeh, N.-C.; Lin, C.-Y. Data Assimilation of Doppler Wind Lidar for the Extreme Rainfall Event Prediction over Northern Taiwan: A Case Study. Atmosphere 2022, 13, 987. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]















| Instrument | Observation Variables | Specification | Manufacturer (Model) |
|---|---|---|---|
| PARSIVEL (PARticle Size and VeLocity disdrometer) | Rain rate, Fall Velocity, Drop Size Spectra etc. | Laser wavelength: 650 nm Measuring area: 54 cm2 (180 × 30 mm) Rain Rate: 0.001–1200 mm h−1 Size range: 0.2–5 mm (fluid type), 0.2–25 mm (solid type) Temporal resolution: 1 min | OTT HydroMet GmbH, Kempten, Germany (OTT Parsivel2) |
| Pluvio (Weighing type rain gauge) | Rain rate, Accumulated precipitation, Temperature | Capacity: 1500 mm Measurement resolution: 0.01 mm Temporal resolution: 1 min | OTT HydroMet GmbH, Kempten, Germany (OTT Pluvio2 L Version 200) |
| 2-Dimensional Video Disdrometer | Reflectivity, Drop size distribution, Shape, Fall velocity, etc. | Measuring area: 10 × 10 cm2 Channel: 0.0–10.25 mm (41 channel) Temporal resolution: 1 min Spatial resolution: drop size bin width of 0.2 mm | Joanneum Research, Graz, Austria (VDIS) |
| MRR (Micro Rain Radar) | Rain rate, Reflectivity, Fall velocity, Drop size Distribution | Frequency: 24.1 GHz Vertical resolution: 10–200 m Range: 0–6 km Temporal resolution: 10–3600 s | METEK GmbH, Elmshorn, Germany (Micro Rain Radar MRR-2) |
| X-band dual polarization radar | Reflectivity, Differential reflectivity, Radial velocity, Differential phase | Frequency: 9.41 GHz Sampling resolution: 1.2–192 m Antenna diameter: 1.8 m Gain: 42 dB Beam width: 1.4° Simultaneous H/V polarization Temporal resolution: 10 min | Ridgeline Instrument, Fort Collins, CO, USA (RXM-25) |
| W-band cloud radar | Reflectivity, Mean doppler velocity, Specific differential phase, Doppler spectral width | Frequency: 94 GHz Observation range: 50–12 km Gain: 50.1 ± 0.3 dB Beam width: 1.4° H/V polarization Temporal resolution: 1 min Vertical resolution: 15–30 m | RPG Radiometer Physics GmbH, Meckenheim, Germany (RPG-FMCW-94) |
| Wind Profiler | Wind direction, Wind speed, Radial velocity | Frequency: 1.29 GHz Beam width: 8° Beam number: 5 beams Maximum height: 5–10 km Vertical resolution: 75 m (Low mode), 172.5 m (High mode) Temporal resolution: 10 min | DEGREANE HORIZON, Cuers, France (PCL-1300) |
| Wind Lidar | Wind direction, Wind speed | Wavelength: 1550 nm Pluse width: 0.25 μs Detectable range: 45 m–6 km Spatial resolution: 30 m Temporal resolution: 0.1–10 s | LEICE, Qingdao, China (Wind3D 6000) |
| Description | |
|---|---|
| Horizontal Grid Size | 3 km |
| Number of Grid | 1050 × 840 × 40 |
| Cumulus Parameterization | KSAS scheme |
| Microphysics | WDM7 scheme |
| Planetary Boundary Layer | Shin-Hong PBL scheme |
| Surface Layer | Revised MM5 Monin-Obukhov formulation |
| Land Surface Physics | Five-layer thermal diffusion |
| Radiation | RRTMG K scheme |
| Initial and Boundary Conditions | KMA global model GDAPS |
| Experiment | Data |
|---|---|
| EXP1 | ASOS, Radiosonde, Wind profiler observed by the KMA |
| EXP2 | EXP1 data, wind lidar and storm tracker from the KPOP program |
| EXP3 | EXP1 data, wind lidar data from the KPOP program |
| EXP4 | EXP1 data, strom tracker data from the KPOP program |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2026 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.
Share and Cite
Byon, J.-Y.; Park, M.; Park, H.; Lee, G. Overview of the Korean Precipitation Observation Program (KPOP) in the Seoul Metropolitan Area. Atmosphere 2026, 17, 130. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos17020130
Byon J-Y, Park M, Park H, Lee G. Overview of the Korean Precipitation Observation Program (KPOP) in the Seoul Metropolitan Area. Atmosphere. 2026; 17(2):130. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos17020130
Chicago/Turabian StyleByon, Jae-Young, Minseong Park, HyangSuk Park, and GyuWon Lee. 2026. "Overview of the Korean Precipitation Observation Program (KPOP) in the Seoul Metropolitan Area" Atmosphere 17, no. 2: 130. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos17020130
APA StyleByon, J.-Y., Park, M., Park, H., & Lee, G. (2026). Overview of the Korean Precipitation Observation Program (KPOP) in the Seoul Metropolitan Area. Atmosphere, 17(2), 130. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos17020130

