Next Article in Journal
Industrial Emission Monitoring and Assessment of Air Quality in Karachi Coastal City, Pakistan
Next Article in Special Issue
Semiarid Lakes of Southwestern Siberia as Sentinels of On-Going Climate Change: Hydrochemistry, the Carbon Cycle, and Modern Carbonate Mineral Formation
Previous Article in Journal
Enhancing Maritime Safety and Efficiency: A Comprehensive Sea Fog Monitoring System for Ningbo Zhoushan Port
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Evaluating Drought Effects on Soil: Innovative Soil Salinity Monitoring via SAR Data, Sentinel-2 Imagery, and Machine Learning Algorithms in Kerkennah Archipelago

1
Georesources and Environment Department, National Engineering School of Sfax ENIS, Sfax 3038, Tunisia
2
Fakultät Landbau/Umwelt/Chemie, Hochschule für Technik und Wirtschaft—HTW Dresden, 01008 Dresden, Germany
3
Geomatic and Geosystems (LR19ES07)/PRODIG (UMR 8586), University of Mannouba, FLAH, University Campus, Manouba 2010, Tunisia
4
Technische Universität Dresden, 01069 Dresden, Germany
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Atmosphere 2023, 14(10), 1514; https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos14101514
Submission received: 22 August 2023 / Revised: 25 September 2023 / Accepted: 26 September 2023 / Published: 29 September 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue The Impact of Climate Change on Water Resources)

Abstract

:
The Kerkennah archipelago in Tunisia is one of the most vulnerable areas where the influence of climate change is undeniable. Soil salinization has emerged as a major consequence of climate variation on this island. In this study, remote sensing techniques were implemented to develop a model for predicting soil salinity from satellite images. Machine learning algorithms, Sentinel-1 and Sentinel-2 data, and ground truth measurements were used to estimate soil salinity. Several algorithms were considered to achieve accurate findings. These algorithms are categorized as polynomial regression, random forest regression, exponential regression, and linear regression. The results demonstrate that exponential regression is the pre-eminent algorithm for estimating soil salinity with high predictive accuracy of R2 = 0.75 and RMSE = 0.47 ds/m. However, spatiotemporal soil salinity maps reveal distinct and clear distribution patterns, highlighting salty areas (i.e., sebkhas) and agricultural parcels. Thus, through the model, we explore areas of moderately high salinity within agricultural lands that could be affected by irrigation practices. The present work demonstrates a reliable model for soil salinity monitoring in the Kerkennah archipelago and inspires more successful technologies such as remote sensing and machine learning to improve the estimation of soil salinity in climate-affected vulnerable areas.

1. Introduction

Climate change is significantly altering arid and semi-arid regions, impacting both the environment and communities [1]. Shifting weather patterns, rising temperatures, and changing ecosystems are introducing complex challenges that are affecting the balance in ecological systems and societal well-being [2]. Coastal areas face rising sea levels, while altered weather impacts agricultural lands and water availability [3]. Notably, the Kerkennah archipelago in Tunisia, stands out as a particularly vulnerable locale within this context. It is currently confronting a pressing and dire situation, characterized by sea-level rise and critical drought conditions. These environmental challenges have precipitated salinization of the island’s surface and a gradual expansion of salt flats [4], thereby exacerbating the island’s vulnerability and destroying its remaining agricultural lands.
According to the literature, very few studies have been conducted on soil salinization in the Kerkennah archipelago [4,5,6,7]. In fact, the primary investigator for soil salinization research, especially on the expansion of salt flats (sebkhas) in Kerkennah, is Etienne [4,5,6], whose studies extensively used remote sensing methods. However, the most recent publication in this regard was published in 2021 [7], in which spectral indices such as the normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI), the automated water extraction index (AWEI), and the salinity index (SI) were used to map soil salinity and identify areas with halophytic vegetation.
Although salinization of the Kerkennah’s lands has become very noticeable, particularly evident due to the decline of palm trees, there remains to be a lack of information concerning the agricultural lands, and a comprehensive and systematic monitoring approach for soil salinization in Kerkennah is notably absent. The absence of such monitoring limits our capacity to make informed decisions and implement targeted interventions to mitigate the adverse impacts of soil salinization on the local ecosystem and agricultural practices.
Traditional soil salinity monitoring and prediction often involve labor-intensive fieldwork and sampling. Prior research has mainly focused on qualitatively differentiating between salinized and non-salinized soils by analyzing soil salinity distribution and dynamics. However, recently, there has been a transformative shift, favoring remote sensing [8], geographic information systems (GIS), and advanced modeling for mapping soil salinity. These technologies provide broad spatial coverage, which is crucial for both agricultural and environmental perspectives, by using remote sensing data to monitor and detect soil salinity effectively.
Recent advances in remote sensing technology have significantly improved the mapping and monitoring of diverse soil attributes, including salinity, by utilizing medium- to high-resolution satellite data [9]. In particular, Sentinel-2 has been useful in mapping soil salinization [10,11,12,13]. Overcoming climate challenges, a recent study employed machine learning techniques with Sentinel-2 data from the Google Earth Engine to accurately predict soil salinity [14]. The authors also combined multiple spectral indices, such as the modified normalized difference water index (MNDWI) by Han Qiu (2005) [15] and the normalized difference salinity index (NDSI) formulated by Khan et al. in 2005 [16]. These indices, along with the NDVI, highlight distinct features like water, vegetation, and salinity in satellite images.
Nevertheless, monitoring by relying on optical sensors like Sentinel-2 could be limited by weather conditions. Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) remote sensing offers all-weather monitoring and penetration capabilities that can capture the attributes of the soil beneath the surface layer [17]. Given the increased accessibility of SAR technology, like the Sentinel-1 mission developed by the European Space Agency, which offers high-resolution imagery (up to 10 m) and a more frequent revisit cycle (6 days) [18], there is now a better chance for enhancing the mapping and monitoring of soil salinity and its associated characteristics. Approaches like machine learning algorithms show promise in modeling the relationship between remote sensing data and electrical conductivity (EC) by using simple linear regression [19], random forest regression [20], support vector machine [21] and other types of regression models [22]. Despite challenges, these statistical models have shown promising results in salinity estimation using Sentinel-1 images in arid and semi-arid regions [12,23,24,25,26,27,28]. These advancements pave the way for improved soil salinity estimation and management. Certain researchers have integrated sensors with varying characteristics to study attribute mapping, and they have discovered that the fusion of multiple sensor sources can significantly enhance the precision of digital soil mapping [29,30]. While there has been advancements in utilizing Sentinel-2 data for mapping soil salinization, utilization of the combination of Sentinel-1 and Sentinel-2 data to predict soil salinity remains relatively limited [30,31].
This study aims to assess the effectiveness of various machine learning algorithms when applied to Sentinel-1 data for soil salinity prediction in the Kerkennah region and to generate comprehensive spatiotemporal maps, since 2018, using Sentinel-1 and Sentinel-2 data and the capabilities of the Google Earth Engine. By harnessing the potential of remote sensing in conjunction with data-driven methods, this research not only provides valuable insights but also has the potential to guide decision-making processes regarding soil salinity management and sustainable land use planning in the Kerkennah archipelago.
It is noteworthy to emphasize a significant advancement in this research, which lies in the introduction of spatiotemporal series encompassing soil salinity and normalized difference vegetation (NDVI) data since 2018. This pioneering endeavor aims to unveil complex environmental dynamics, shedding light on the intricate interplay between drought conditions, soil salinity variations, and the broader ecological landscape of the Kerkennah archipelago. Consequently, this study marks the first attempt to employ machine learning techniques in conjunction with Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) data to monitor, predict, and understand the evolution of soil salinity dynamics in the unique context of the Kerkennah archipelago.
This study seeks to offer a valuable monitoring tool intended for use by decision-makers and farmers, especially in agricultural regions grappling with the critical problem of soil salinization, where such crucial information is currently absent. It addresses the urgent demand for efficient monitoring in areas where soil salinity represents a substantial challenge to agricultural productivity and long-term sustainability.
The paper is organized as follows: In Section 2, the study areas, the datasets used, and the methodology implemented for processing RADAR and optical data are discussed. A detailed presentation of the machine learning algorithms employed for performance evaluation is also provided. Section 3 is dedicated to the development, testing, and validation of soil salinity prediction maps. Finally, the correlations between these data and vegetation health are examined and discussed.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Area

Kerkennah is an archipelago located in the Gulf of Gabes, about 18 km from the town of Sfax in Tunisia, and it consists of two main islands, i.e., Chergui and Gharbi, as shown in Figure 1, along with twelve smaller islets.
The archipelago covers an area of 15.7 thousand hectares and is characterized by a flat and monotonous relief with low slopes and a maximum altitude of 13 m. The archipelago is known for its fragile natural environment, which is characterized by an arid climate with a long dry period with an average annual precipitation of 200 mm/yr. The area is dominated by soft formations, particularly red würmian silts, which are prone to coastal erosion [32]. Additionally, saline soils cover almost half of the total area and only a few agricultural lands are left in Kerkennah [4].
The fragility of Kerkennah’s environment is further exacerbated by two major problems. Firstly, the sea-level rise and, secondly, the continuous expansion of salt playas at the expense of the palm groves that are dying gradually, as shown in Figure 1. This is primarily caused by human activities, such as increased salt production, unregulated construction practices, and illicit sand extraction for building purposes [33].
The predominant agricultural activity on the islands revolves around olive cultivation, which is the most widely grown crop. Additionally, pomegranates, vines, and naturally occurring palm trees are also cultivated [34].
The research area, where samples were collected, as shown in Figure 2, encompasses a diverse range of land types which allowed us to examine variations in soil salinity across different land uses and salinity levels. In fact, it comprises a big part of the renowned “Zorii Forest,” as well as segments of the irrigated parcels of Ramla (irrigated with underground water from the well with salinity level of approximately 3.6 g/L, shown in Figure 1) and parts of the Brenka sebkha and the Ouled Kacem sebkha. This geographical choice offers a distinct differentiation between saline and non-saline lands. Notably, the “Zorii Forest” encompasses a vast 500 hectares, making it the largest and oldest cultivated land in Kerkennah. It is characterized by its “rendzina” soil type [35], abundant in limestone, known locally as “hmeda” in Kerkennah. This area is also characterized by its diversified vegetation and its unique grape and fig varieties, some of which have flourished for centuries.

2.2. Ground Truth Data

Ground truth data for soil salinity levels were collected during field surveys on 20 and 21 February 2023. A total of 59 soil samples were collected from various locations representing different land cover types and soil salinity levels, as shown in Table 1. Each soil sample was georeferenced using a Global Positioning System (GPS) device for accurate spatial integration.
The depth of the soil samples ranged from 0 to 30 cm. The images in Figure 1 depict four sample sites. A standardized procedure was followed to collect soil samples at each location. Each analyzed sample was a composite of 9 soil samples collected from different places of a (10 × 10) m square centered at the sample location. This approach was followed to optimize the sample representation within the Sentinel-1 image pixel (10 × 10) m square. We strategically positioned the samples in close proximity to each other to enhance the accuracy of our digital mapping within the study area.
When the collected samples arrived at the laboratory, they were air dried at the laboratory room temperature for almost a week. After that, fragments of the samples, such as stones, wood, and roots, were taken out and pounded to a fine powder in an agate mortar and pestle until they could pass through a 2 mm sieve. The electrical conductivity (EC) of a suspension of unfiltered 1:5 dirt and deionized water was measured by the following steps: Soil suspensions were prepared by combining 5 g of soil with 25 mL of distilled. A consistent agitation was maintained using a magnetic agitator for a duration of 2 h. Subsequently, the electrical conductivity (EC) of the suspensions was quantified using a conductivity meter. It is noteworthy that the EC meter underwent calibration at 25° using a KCl standard solution (1.413 dS/m) prior to conducting measurements on the soil suspensions. This calibration procedure underscores the precision and accuracy of the EC measurements.

2.3. Sentinel-1 C-SAR and Sentinel-2 MSI Satellite Dataset

The S1 GRDH_1SDV (VV, VH) image, obtained from [36] was captured on 21 February 2023, and reveals intricacies of the entire Kerkennah archipelago’s features. Operating within the C-band frequency of 5.405 GHz, the Sentinel-1A SAR data employ the interferometric wide-swath mode to efficiently encompass extensive areas, and as a ground range detected product type, it achieves precise representations, fortified by an impressive pixel resolution of 20 × 22 m and pixel spacing of 10 × 10 m. Additionally, a temporal resolution from 3 to 5 days in Tunisia facilitate meticulous monitoring of landscape dynamics. While in its ascending orbit, the image offers dual-polarization observations (VV and VH), spanning a swath of 250 × 350 km and featuring an incidence angle varying from 30.6 to 46.0 degrees [18]. These collective attributes enhance the adaptability of this indispensable dataset, significantly contributing to the advancement of insights into environmental dynamics.
The Sentinel-2 MSI satellite data, launched on 23 June 2015, signify a significant advancement in the field of terrestrial observation. Covering an extensive geographic range from 82.8° N to 56° S, this satellite comprises four units (A, B, C, and D), operating at an altitude of 786 km and conducting observations at 10:30 LTDN. With a spectrum capturing frequencies ranging from 490 nm to 1375 nm, distributed across 13 distinct bands, the Sentinel-2 MSI offers diverse resolution capabilities. Details at a 10 m resolution are available in bands B2 (490 nm), B3 (560 nm), B4 (665 nm), and B8 (842 nm), while bands B5 (705 nm), B6 (740 nm), B7 (783 nm), B8a (865 nm), B11 (1610 nm), and B12 (2190 nm) provide a 20 m resolution. Bands B1 (443 nm), B9 (940 nm), and B10 (1375 nm) exhibit a 60 m resolution [37]. With a bit depth of 12, these data are acquired over a width of 290 km and are subject to a revisiting period of 5 days. The data are stored in the SAFE format for effective management and accessibility. Notably, all data from the years 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022, and 2023 downloaded [37], have been meticulously processed to extract spatiotemporal vegetation index series, thereby providing a means to monitor temporal variations in vegetation cover.
Figure 2 depicts an image captured by the Sentinel-1 satellite on 21 February 2023. The image showcases a color composite of backscatter values (σ0) derived from Sentinel-1 data, expressed in decibels (dB), originating from the Kerkennah archipelago. In this composition, distinct color channels are allocated as follows: red signifies VV polarization, green denotes VH polarization, and blue represents the VH/VV ratio. Notably, this image features a magnified perspective of a specific region, where on-ground measurements were executed on 20 and 21 February 2021. This targeted area is confined within a section of the Zorri Forest agricultural zone.
Examination of the color composite radar image underscores the notable discrepancies in land cover throughout the entire study area. These disparities are conspicuous due to the unique attributes inherent in the various radar polarizations employed for the composite representation. More specifically, the red color, symbolizing the VV polarization, accentuates smooth and compact surfaces. Such areas may encompass elements like roadways, urbanized zones, or exposed soils. The green color, linked to VH polarization, unveils rugged surfaces and regions characterized by denser vegetation. Vegetation, woodlands, and cultivated fields are distinguishable in this hue. The blue element, corresponding to the VH/VV ratio, enables the differentiation of distinct terrain characteristics. This ratio can yield insights into soil roughness.

2.4. Preprocessing and Approach for Salinity Mapping

The process of generating spatiotemporal salinity maps in the Kerkennah agricultural zone, utilizing Sentinel-1, Sentinel-2, and in situ data, comprises a series of interconnected stages.
The data acquisition and preprocessing phase entail multiple steps as follows: Acquiring Sentinel-1 SAR image data, applying radiometric calibration to convert backscatter coefficients, subsetting to cover the study area, employing speckle filtering for noise reduction, and executing range doppler terrain correction. Calculation of the SAR index (Figure 3), derived from mathematical equations involving vertical-vertical (VV) and vertical-horizontal (VH) polarizations, was conducted.
In total, thirteen SAR indices were computed based on the in situ electrical conductivity parameter. Then, these indices along with VV and VH were subjected to a thorough analysis to identify the most promising potential indicators. Subsequently, a correlation matrix was employed to assess and to determine the best correlated index with the EC values.
In situ data collection (Table 1) involved measuring the soil electrical conductivity (EC) distributed across the study area. Regarding Sentinel-2 data, optical imagery from 2018 to 2023 was acquired using the Google Earth Engine, followed by atmospheric correction and calculation of the normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) values for a vegetation analysis. Then, time series datasets were constructed by organizing the SAR indices, EC data, and NDVI values with corresponding dates. The application of machine learning algorithms, including regression techniques, utilized in situ EC data, SAR indices, and NDVI as input parameters. The model was selected based on the coefficient of determination R2 and the root mean square error (RMSE) values that were calculated as follows (a model with an R2 closer to 1 indicates better explanatory power, while an RMSE closer to 0 reflects more accurate predictions):
RMSE = 1 N 1 N y i y ^ ( i ) 2
R 2 = 1 1 N y i y ^ ( i ) 2 1 N y i y ¯ ( i ) 2
where y(i) is the observed value for the ith data point, y ^ ( i ) is the predicted value for the i-th data point, and y ¯ ( i ) is the mean (average) of the observed values.
Once the model was selected and validated, it was employed to predict EC values throughout the area, and then throughout the whole Island, combining NDVI data to generate spatiotemporal maps illustrating trends in soil salinity and vegetation health.
The final step involved interpreting the generated maps to discern spatial and temporal variations in salinity, effectively communicated through visualization methods that highlight changes in the agricultural landscape. Figure 3 summarizes the methodology applied in this study.
The insights extracted from Figure 4 offer a comprehensive view of the relationships between Sigma VH, Sigma VV, and various indices and the EC values. Among these factors, Sigma VH, Sigma VV, and three other indices stand out for their significant correlations, denoted as “R” (referring to the Pearson correlation coefficient), as depicted in Figure 4. Notably, these correlations exhibit a consistent negative moderate correlation, ranging from approximately −0.4 to −0.47. This consistency in negative correlation values guided us in making a deliberate and strategic choice. We opted to simplify our analysis by exclusively utilizing Sigma VH for the subsequent phases of our study, given its highest correlation value of −0.47. This strategic decision not only streamlined our approach but also ensured that our attention remained focused on the most influential and representative parameter for our research.

2.5. Machine Learning Algorithms Used

2.5.1. Random Forest Regression

The random forest (RF) algorithm is an ensemble learning method proposed by Breiman [37]. It uses multiple decision trees with the same distribution to set up a forest for training and predicting sample data [38]. Decision trees are non-parametric supervised learning methods that summarize decision rules from data, and use the tree structure to solve classification and regression problems.
In the case of regression, the RF algorithm uses regression trees (RT). At each branching of the RT, the mean of the samples on the leaf nodes and the mean square error (MSE) formed between each sample are calculated. The algorithm pursues the minimum MSE as the branching condition until no more features are available or the overall MSE is optimal, at which point the regression tree stops growing [39].

2.5.2. Polynomial and Linear Regression

Polynomial regression is a type of linear regression that aims to find an appropriate polynomial of a certain order to describe the relationship between an independent variable (x) and a dependent variable (y) [40]. It is a special case of multiple linear regression (MLR) where the polynomial equation is used to capture the curvilinear interaction between the variables [41]. Polynomial regression allows for more flexibility in fitting the data compared to simple linear regression. The general form of polynomial regression is illustrated in Equation (3):
y_(i) = a_0 + a_1 x_i + a_2 x_i^2 + a_3 x_i^3 +⋯+ a_m x_i^m + ε_i
The coefficients (am) represent the polynomial, and the order m determines the complexity of the polynomial. When m = 1, it becomes a linear model, and when m = 2, it becomes a quadratic regression model. Polynomial fitting aims to construct a polynomial of order m that approximates the data points, minimizing the residual error between the estimated and actual values.
The polynomial equation includes higher-order terms such as quadratic and cubic, which can better capture the nonlinear relationships between the variables [42]. The degree of the polynomial determines the complexity of the model [43]. The least square method is commonly used to estimate the coefficients of the polynomial equation.

2.5.3. Exponential Regression

Exponential regression represents a nonlinear modeling approach within statistical analysis, designed specifically to accommodate datasets that display exponential growth or decay characteristics. This method entails the fitting of an exponential function to the data, where the functional relationship between the dependent variable and one or more independent variables is expressed through an exponential equation [44].
The functional form of the exponential equation is articulated as:
y = a e^bx
In this context:
  • y Signifies the dependent variable, typically the focal aspect of prediction or elucidation;
  • a Denotes the coefficient that vertically scales the exponential curve;
  • e Symbolizes the base of the natural logarithm, an unvarying constant approximately equal to 2.71828;
  • b Represents the exponent governing the rate of growth or decay;
  • x Stands for the independent variable.
Exponential regression proves to be particularly efficacious when confronted with datasets that manifest a consistent percentage rate of increment or decrement over a spectrum of temporal or independent variable values [45].

3. Results

3.1. Performance of Machine Learning Algorithms

The performances of the machine learning algorithms, including polynomial regression, random forest, exponential regression and linear regression were evaluated based on their predictive accuracy for soil salinity estimation. Table 2 presents the performance metrics obtained using four different regression models, using sigma VH and EC values using python.
From Table 2, based on their coefficient of determination (R2) and root mean square error (RMSE) values, the evaluation of several regression algorithms on the dataset indicates distinct performance trends. On the one hand, with an R2 of 0.84 and a low RMSE of 0.83, the random forest model exhibits strong fitting, and despite having a lower R2 of 0.75, the exponential regression model produces reliable predictions, as shown by its low RMSE of 0.47. The linear regression model, on the other hand, exhibits weak explanatory power with an R2 of 0.32 and bigger residuals with an RMSE of 0.79. With an R2 of 0.91, suggesting good fitting, and an astonishingly low RMSE of 0.28, confirming its accuracy in prediction, the polynomial regression model is impressive. This concise analysis underscores the superior performance of random forest and polynomial regression in capturing the data’s intricate relationships. Polynomial regression initially appeared to have the highest correlation, but it generated, in fact, a fifth-degree equation, which overly complicated the relationship we were seeking to establish. We eliminated it due to concerns about overfitting. When deciding between the random forest (RF) and exponential regression models, even though the RF model had a slightly higher R2, we favored the exponential regression model for its simplicity and its alignment with the inherent exponential-like curve observed in our data and also for having lower and better RMSE results. Our goal was to find a direct and interpretable relationship, making exponential regression a more suitable choice
Opting for the exponential regression model appears to be the most fitting choice given this dataset and the R2 and RMSE results. The distinctive trends and patterns in the data align well with the exponential nature of the regression model as shown in Figure 5. This alignment highlights the model’s ability to capture and represent the intricate relationships in the dataset, making it a suitable choice for analysis by choosing the exponential regression model.
The equation driven from the chosen exponential model is illustrated in Equation (4):
Y = 0.000000036 exp(−0.81X)
where Y represents the predicted values of electrical conductivity and X corresponds to the values of different Sigma VH obtained from the Sentinel-1 data.

3.2. Soil Salinity Prediction Maps

Then, the best-performing machine learning algorithm, i.e., exponential regression, was applied to the entire Sentinel-1 dataset to predict the annual soil salinity level across the study area and, afterwards, across the entire Kerkennah islands.
Figure 6 illustrates the distinct pattern of salinity distribution within the study area. The high salinity regions that correspond to EC values ranging between 12 and 30 ds/m are primarily concentrated in the northern and southern sectors, while the rest of the area displays low salinity levels close to zero. However, there are some small areas of high EC values ranging from 6 to 18 ds/m all along the study area. This distribution aligns logically with the notable demarcation between the Brenka sebkha to the north, the Ouled Kacem sebkha to the south, and the agricultural parcels of the “Zorii Forest” and the “hmeda” soil in between. Notably, smaller areas of elevated salinity (ranging from 6 to 18 ds/m) are evident within the agricultural lands, especially in the eastern and northeastern zones. These areas receive irrigation from wells with a salinity level of 3.6 g/L. In fact, the average amount of salt injected annually per hectare is about 9.35 tons within the irrigated perimeter of Remla, according to Fehri [33]; however, this should not result in such high EC values, but we can see that this had a clear influence. It is possible that the model is overestimating these values because, while performing the validation with the validation sampling, we noticed this particular overestimation in moderately saline soils inside the agricultural parcels.
Across the time period from 2018 to 2023, a pattern of soil salinity variation is visible, and it appears to have its origins in the different annual precipitation patterns that distinguish each of these years. The interplay between rainfall and salinity dynamics becomes evident as we observe these slight variations. Notably, 2019 and 2020 emerge as an intriguing outlier within this context. It showcases the lowest EC values observed across all the years examined. This deviation sparks curiosity and invites a further investigation into the specific environmental factors and mechanisms that might have contributed to this exceptional dip in soil salinity.
Taking a closer look at Figure 7, we applied the model on the entire island to see its efficiency, the differentiation among saline flats (sebkhas) can clearly be observed, characterized by high EC values ranging from 6 to 30 ds/m, while the remaining areas exhibit notably lower EC values near zero This alignment reinforces the accuracy of the mapping outcomes in effectively delineating regions with varying soil salinity.
The depiction of saline soils is highly accurate and aligns seamlessly with the soil occupancy map created by Etienne in 2017 [4].
Upon closer examination of the temporal data, a compelling trend emerges. The islands display a slight oscillation in salinity, particularly noticeable in its southern sector, Gharbi Island, as evidenced by the transition from red to green shades in 2019 and 2020.
Unexpectedly, during these specific years, an apparent reduction in soil salinity becomes evident in the southern part of the Gharbi Island. It is worth emphasizing that, even amid the fluctuations in overall salinity levels, the fundamental topographical features of the sebkhas maintain their consistent form and presence. Upon closer examination, a compelling revelation emerges when analyzing the precipitation data for the years 2019 and 2020, sourced from the meteorological station of the Ramla sector, provided by the Territorial Extension Unit of Kerkennah (CTV Kerkennah). The hydrological year 2019–2020 stands out as having recorded the highest annual precipitation levels among all the years under consideration. Notably, the period from September 2019 to August 2020 witnessed an annual precipitation of 353 mm, with distinct spikes in October 2019 (167.5 mm) and March 2020 (53.5 mm). Furthermore, the previous hydrological year 2018–2019 also had an annual precipitation of 285.4 mm that apparently influenced the EC values of 2019. It becomes evident that this significant precipitation exerted a pronounced influence on the island’s salt levels, particularly within the sebkha regions, and more specifically in the case of the El West sebkha located on Gharbi Island. This area, which is characterized by a very altitude (between 0 and 2 m), appears to have been particularly affected by the substantial influx of rainfall, leading to observable changes in salt levels.

3.3. Correlation with Vegetation Health Data

The soil salinity prediction maps were analyzed in conjunction with vegetation health information derived from the Sentinel-2 data and NDVI values (Figure 8).
This analysis aimed to identify correlations between soil salinity levels and land use practices. Areas with sparse vegetation cover or land uses that intensify salinization, such as improper irrigation practices, may exhibit higher soil salinity levels.
Upon initial observation, a notable trend emerges indicating a significant decrease in NDVI values over the entire time span from 2018 to 2023. In fact, areas with high NDVI values, ranging from 0.15 to 0.3, correspond to areas with high vegetation; however, areas with low NDVI values, ranging from 0 to 0.15, correspond to areas with low vegetation. This observation provides us with insight into a decline in the overall vegetation health of the islands’ vegetation.
A closer examination reveals an interesting anomaly in the year 2020, where vegetation experienced an unexpected increase, particularly, in the northern part of Chargui island. Upon reexamination of the soil salinity maps, a noteworthy observation arises, i.e., the regions exhibiting elevated NDVI values in 2020 coincide with areas of markedly high salinity. It is essential to recognize that sebkhas, known for their high salt content, harbor halophytes that can significantly impact NDVI values. These findings prompt further investigation into the intricate relationship between vegetation, soil salinity, and the presence of halophytes. Relying only on NDVI values may not provide a definitive understanding of the vegetation type, particularly whether it comprises halophytes. Therefore, differentiating areas with halophytes as saline regions cannot simply rely on NDVI assessments, which has also been demonstrated in another recent publication [7].

4. Discussion

The vulnerable Kerkennah archipelago, in addition to facing sea-level rise, is facing critical drought conditions, leading to salinization of its surface and expansion of salt flats. Despite the islands’ apparent salinization, a comprehensive and systematic monitoring approach for soil salinization, especially in agricultural lands, has been lacking, limiting informed decision making to address its adverse impacts. Recent advancements in remote sensing technologies have transformed soil salinity monitoring and prediction. The integration of Geographic Information Systems (GIS) and advanced machine learning algorithms with satellite data offers wide spatial coverage, essential for agricultural and environmental perspectives.
This study’s approach involved using machine learning algorithms with Sentinel-1 data to build a soil salinity prediction model. We also utilized Sentinel-2 data to generate maps of the NDVI values to better understand the correlation between soil salinity levels and land use practices.
Different regression models were applied on Sentinel-1 data to generate the best reliable model for constructing soil salinity prediction maps in the Kerkennah region. Various regression models were used, like polynomial, random forest, linear regression, and exponential regression. Similar recent studies (2023) have highlighted the efficacy of various regression algorithms, like random forest with R2 = 0.80 [24] and the PLSR model with R2 = 0.66 [46], for predicting soil salinity in semi-arid and arid regions. Notably, in our study, the exponential regression model, due to its accurate fitting R2 = 0.75 and low root mean square error (RMSE) = 0.47 ds/m, was selected to predict soil salinity based on ground truth measurements and Sentinel-1 SAR data.
The elaborated maps, generated by applying the exponential regression model on different Sentinel-1 data using the Google Earth Engine, revealed distinctive patterns of the annual soil salinity distribution in the study area in the six previous years (from 2018 to 2023). High salinity regions were concentrated in the northern and southern sectors, corresponding to EC values ranging from 12 to 30 ds/m. In contrast, the remaining areas displayed low salinity levels close to zero. These findings aligned logically with the geographical features and the presence of sebkhas (the Brenka sebkha in the north and the Oueld Kacem sebkha in the south) and agricultural parcels. Interestingly, smaller areas with EC values from 6 to 18 ds/m were evident within agricultural lands, particularly, in the eastern and northeastern zones. Although there is a possibility of overestimation, these values provide insight into the potential enduring effects of utilizing underground water with a salinity level of 3.6 g/L for irrigation purposes. Over the years from 2018 to 2023, temporal variation in soil salinity was observed, possibly attributed to annual precipitation patterns.
Applying the model on the entire Kerkennah archipelago has yielded highly precise outcomes that closely resemble the earlier land use maps created by Etienne in 2017 [4]. These outcomes effectively differentiate saline soil areas from agricultural regions. Between 2018 and 2023, fluctuations in soil salinity were noted, potentially linked to the varying patterns of annual precipitation. Notably, the years 2019 and 2020 stood out due to their significantly lower EC values especially in the southern part of the islands (Gharbi Island). This anomaly prompted further investigation, and upon analyzing the meteorological station data, it was evident that these two years experienced the highest annual precipitation levels. The relationship between increased rainfall and decreased soil salinity in these years provided valuable insights into the complex interplay between precipitation and salt levels.
To understand the correlation between soil salinity levels and land use practices, this study integrated soil salinity prediction maps with Sentinel-2-derived NDVI data using the Google Earth Engine. The analysis revealed a consistent decrease in NDVI values over the study period, suggesting a decline in vegetation health. Notably, an unexpected increase in NDVI values was observed in 2020 due to relatively high precipitation levels in 2019 and 2020, particularly, in the northern part of the archipelago. Intriguingly, this increase in vegetation health coincided with areas of high soil salinity, primarily sebkhas known for their halophytic vegetation. However, relying solely on NDVI data for differentiating halophyte-influenced areas may not provide accurate results as demonstrated in a previous study [7].
The developed model presents a promising approach for accurate soil salinity prediction and mapping in the Kerkennah archipelago. This model could be used to monitor soil salinity in the entire island area and especially in agricultural parcels. However, it has shown its limitation when attributing EC values to saline soils. It seems to be overestimating EC values in saline or moderately saline areas. A future sampling campaign should be conducted to calibrate and better validate the model. This campaign would aim to gather additional ground truth data from different areas of the islands that accurately represent the varying degrees of soil salinity present in the study area. By incorporating this new data into the model, adjustments can be made to enhance its accuracy and to ensure that the predicted EC values align more closely with the actual soil salinity levels. Another intriguing approach would involve enhancing soil salinity models by integrating environmental variables through the utilization of a multiple criteria decision analysis.

5. Conclusions

In conclusion, the potential of Sentinel-1 data to predict soil salinity is highlighted through this study. This study focused on a localized model calibration approach, where the model was constructed through the utilization of ground truth measurements and Sentinel-1 SAR data.
The chosen machine learning algorithm, i.e., exponential regression, was applied to Sentinel-1 datasets using the Google Earth Engine, enabling the mapping of the average annual salinity of the Kerkennah islands over the past 6 years.
The model created very accurate soil salinity maps, highlighting the salty area in the island and even the moderately salty areas within the agricultural parcels. While certain overestimations of EC values in saline regions were observed, the overall reliability and capacity of the model to monitor soil salinization in the Kerkennah archipelago remain uncompromised.
With its implications, this study could serve as a foundational step toward the development of more precise models for monitoring soil salinity using SAR data in the Kerkennah archipelago. To this end, a subsequent sampling campaign could be carried out to fine tune and to better validate the current model. Alternatively, exploration of using alternative machine learning algorithms might lead to the creation of an even more refined predictive model.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, S.H. and R.K.; methodology, R.K., S.H., B.K. and M.W.Z.; investigation, S.H. and R.B.; writing—original draft preparation, S.H. and R.K.; writing—review and editing, S.H., R.K., B.K. and C.S.; supervision, R.K., C.S. and M.K. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

We would like to express our special thanks to the Deutsche Akademische Austausch dienst (DAAD) for their support.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Data Availability Statement

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

The authors extend their gratitude to DAAD for their generous support in facilitating the execution of this research project. Additionally, special thanks are extended to the ONG “Kantara save earth” for their valuable assistance during the sampling campaign in privately owned agricultural lands and to the Territorial Extension Unit of Kerkennah (CTV Kerkennah) for their valuable collaboration and swift provision of precipitation data and other valuable information on the research sector.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Brochier, F.; Ramieri, E. Climate Change Impacts on the Mediterranean Coastal Zones. SSRN J. 2001, 27, 82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Shivanna, K.R. Climate change and its impact on biodiversity and human welfare. Proc. Indian Natl. Sci. Acad. 2022, 88, 160–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Griggs, G.; Reguero, B.G. Coastal Adaptation to Climate Change and Sea-Level Rise. Water 2021, 13, 2151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Étienne, L. La Salinisation des Sols dans L’archipel de Kerkennah, Tunisie. Mappemonde 2017, 119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Etienne, L. Accentuation récente de la vulnérabilité liée à la mobilité du trait de côte et à la salinisation des sols dans l’archipel de Kerkennah (Tunisie). Thèse de doctorat. Université Paris Diderot (Paris 7) Sorbonne Paris Cité; Université de Sfax (Faculté des Lettres et Sciences Humaines). 326 p. 2014. Available online: https://theses.hal.science/tel-01075029 (accessed on 25 September 2023).
  6. Étienne, L.; Dahech, S.; Beltrando, G.; Daoud, A. Dynamiques Récentes Des Sebkhas Littorales De L’archipel Des Kerkennah (Tunisie Centro-Méridionale): Apport De La Télédétection. Rev. Télédétect. 2012, 11, 274–281. [Google Scholar]
  7. Kurbatova, A.I.; Bouchhima, R.A.; Grigorets, E.A.; Tsymbarovich, P.R.; Ksibi, M. Methodology for mapping soil salinity and halophyte cover using remote sensing data in Kerkennah, Tunisia. Euro-Mediterr. J. Environ. Integr. 2021, 6, 51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Maxwell, A.E.; Warner, T.A.; Fang, F. Implementation of machine-learning classification in remote sensing: An applied review. Int. J. Remote Sens. 2018, 39, 2784–2817. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Zheng, Z.; Zhang, F.; Ma, F.; Chai, X.; Zhu, Z.; Shi, J.; Zhang, S. Spatiotemporal changes in soil salinity in a drip-irrigated field. Geoderma 2009, 149, 243–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Ismaili, M.; Krimissa, S.; Namous, M.; Htitiou, A.; Abdelrahman, K.; Fnais, M.S.; Lhissou, R.; Eloudi, H.; Faouzi, E.; Benabdelouahab, T. Assessment of Soil Suitability Using Machine Learning in Arid and Semi-Arid Regions. Agronomy 2023, 13, 165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Maki, M.; Sritumboon, S.; Srisutham, M.; Yoshida, K.; Homma, K.; Sukchan, S. Impact of changes in the relationship between salinity and soil moisture on remote sensing data usage in northeast Thailand. Hydrol. Res. Lett. 2022, 16, 54–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Tripathi, A.; Tiwari, R.K. A simplified subsurface soil salinity estimation using synergy of SENTINEL-1 SAR and SENTINEL-2 multispectral satellite data, for early stages of wheat crop growth in Rupnagar, Punjab, India. Land Degrad. Dev. 2021, 32, 3905–3919. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Yahiaoui, I.; Bradaï, A.; Douaoui, A.; Abdennour, M.A. Performance of random forest and buffer analysis of Sentinel-2 data for modelling soil salinity in the Lower-Cheliff plain (Algeria). Int. J. Remote Sens. 2021, 42, 148–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Kaplan, G.; Gašparović, M.; Alqasemi, A.S.; Aldhaheri, A.; Abuelgasim, A.; Ibrahim, M. Soil salinity prediction using Machine Learning and Sentinel—2 Remote Sensing Data in Hyper—Arid areas. Phys. Chem. Earth Parts A/B/C 2023, 130, 103400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Xu, H.Q. A study on information extraction of water body with the modified normalized difference water index (MNDWI). J. Remote Sens. 2005, 9, 589–595. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  16. Khan, N.M.; Rastoskuev, V.V.; Sato, Y.; Shiozawa, S. Assessment of hydrosaline land degradation by using a simple approach of remote sensing indicators. Agric. Water Manag. 2005, 77, 96–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Baghdadi, N.; Boyer, N.; Todoroff, P.; El Hajj, M.; Bégué, A. Potential of SAR sensors TerraSAR-X, ASAR/ENVISAT and PALSAR/ALOS for monitoring sugarcane crops on Reunion Island. Remote Sens. Environ. 2009, 113, 1724–1738. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. European Space Agency. Available online: http://www.esa.int/Applications/Observing_the_Earth/Copernicus/Sentinel-1/Introducing_Sentinel-1 (accessed on 25 September 2023).
  19. Hihi, S.; Rabah, Z.B.; Bouaziz, M.; Chtourou, M.Y.; Bouaziz, S. Prediction of Soil Salinity Using Remote Sensing Tools and Linear Regression Model. Adv. Remote Sens. 2019, 8, 77–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Fathizad, H.; Ali Hakimzadeh Ardakani, M.; Sodaiezadeh, H.; Kerry, R.; Taghizadeh-Mehrjardi, R. Investigation of the spatial and temporal variation of soil salinity using random forests in the central desert of Iran. Geoderma 2020, 365, 114233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Guan, X.; Wang, S.; Gao, Z.; Lv, Y. Dynamic prediction of soil salinization in an irrigation district based on the support vector machine. Math. Comput. Model. 2013, 58, 719–724. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Allbed, A.; Kumar, L.; Aldakheel, Y.Y. Assessing soil salinity using soil salinity and vegetation indices derived from IKONOS high-spatial resolution imageries: Applications in a date palm dominated region. Geoderma 2014, 230–231, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Hoa, P.; Giang, N.; Binh, N.; Hai, L.; Pham, T.D.; Hasanlou, M.; Tien Bui, D. Soil Salinity Mapping Using SAR Sentinel-1 Data and Advanced Machine Learning Algorithms: A Case Study at Ben Tre Province of the Mekong River Delta (Vietnam). Remote Sens. 2019, 11, 128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Li, J.; Zhang, T.; Shao, Y.; Ju, Z. Comparing Machine Learning Algorithms for Soil Salinity Mapping Using Topographic Factors and Sentinel-1/2 Data: A Case Study in the Yellow River Delta of China. Remote Sens. 2023, 15, 2332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Merembayev, T.; Amirgaliyev, Y.; Saurov, S.; Wójcik, W. Soil Salinity Classification Using Machine Learning Algorithms and Radar Data in the Case from the South of Kazakhstan. J. Ecol. Eng. 2022, 23, 61–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Taghadosi, M.M.; Hasanlou, M.; Eftekhari, K. Soil salinity mapping using dual-polarized SAR Sentinel-1 imagery. Int. J. Remote Sens. 2019, 40, 237–252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Zhang, Q.; Li, L.; Sun, R.; Zhu, D.; Zhang, C.; Chen, Q. Retrieval of the Soil Salinity from Sentinel-1 Dual-Polarized SAR Data Based on Deep Neural Network Regression. IEEE Geosci. Remote Sens. Lett. 2022, 19, 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Zhang, Q.; Zhou, Z.S.; Caccetta, P.; Simons, J.; Li, L. Sentinel-1 Imagery Incorporating Machine Learning for Dryland Salinity Monitoring: A Case Study in Esperance, Western Australia. In Proceedings of the IGARSS 2020–2020 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium, Waikoloa, HI, USA, 26 September–2 October 2020; IEEE: Piscataway, NJ, USA, 2020; pp. 4914–4917. Available online: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9323426/ (accessed on 21 August 2023).
  29. Rudiyanto Minasny, B.; Setiawan, B.I.; Saptomo, S.K.; McBratney, A.B. Open digital mapping as a cost-effective method for mapping peat thickness and assessing the carbon stock of tropical peatlands. Geoderma 2018, 313, 25–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Alexakis, D.; Mexis, F.D.; Vozinaki, A.E.; Daliakopoulos, I.; Tsanis, I. Soil Moisture Content Estimation Based on Sentinel-1 and Auxiliary Earth Observation Products. A Hydrological Approach. Sensors 2017, 17, 1455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Ma, G.; Ding, J.; Han, L.; Zhang, Z.; Ran, S. Digital mapping of soil salinization based on Sentinel-1 and Sentinel-2 data combined with machine learning algorithms. Reg. Sustain. 2021, 2, 177–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Delteil, J. Le cadre néotectonique de la sédimentation plio-quaternaire en Tunisie centrale et aux îles Kerkennah. Bull. Soc. Géol. Fr. 1982, 7, 187–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Fehri, N. La palmeraie des Îles Kerkennah (Tunisie), un paysage d’oasis maritime en dégradation: Déterminisme naturel ou responsabilité anthropique? Physio-Geo 2011, 5, 167–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Allouche, F.K.; Hamaideh, A.; Khachlouf, K.; Ckhikha, H.B.; Hanafi, A.; M’sadak, Y. Agrarian System Diagnosis in Kerkennah Archipelago, Tunisia. In Agro-Environmental Sustainability in MENA Regions; Abu-Hashim, M., Khebour Allouche, F., Negm, A., Eds.; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2021; pp. 91–116. Available online: https://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-030-78574-1_5 (accessed on 5 August 2023).
  35. BEN HASSINE H. et BESBES M. (1994)-Étude pédologique des îles Kerkennah. Édit. CRDA,Sfax, 21. Available online: https://www.researchgate.net/figure/Carte-pedologique-des-Iles-Kerkennah-source-H-BEN-HASSINE-et-M-BESBES-1994_fig2_270041846 (accessed on 5 August 2023).
  36. Copernicus Open Access Hub. Available online: https://scihub.copernicus.eu/ (accessed on 5 August 2023).
  37. Breiman, L. Random Forests. Mach. Learn. 2001, 45, 5–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Zhang, S.; Du, P.; Chen, C.; Zhong, W.D.; Alphones, A. Robust 3D Indoor VLP System Based on ANN Using Hybrid RSS/PDOA. IEEE Access 2019, 7, 47769–47780. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Kuhn, M.; Johnson, K. Applied Predictive Modeling; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2013; Available online: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-1-4614-6849-3 (accessed on 21 August 2023).
  40. Prasad, A.K.; Ahadi, M.; Thakur, B.S.; Roy, S. Accurate polynomial chaos expansion for variability analysis using optimal design of experiments. In Proceedings of the 2015 IEEE MTT-S International Conference on Numerical Electromagnetic and Multiphysics Modeling and Optimization (NEMO), Ottawa, ON, Canada, 11–14 August 2015; IEEE: Piscataway, NJ, USA, 2015; pp. 1–4. Available online: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/7415055/ (accessed on 21 August 2023).
  41. Chen, Y.; He, P.; Chen, W.; Zhao, F. A polynomial regression method based on Trans-dimensional Markov Chain Monte Carlo. In Proceedings of the 2018 IEEE 3rd Advanced Information Technology, Electronic and Automation Control Conference (IAEAC), Chongqing, China, 12–14 October 2018; IEEE: Piscataway, NJ, USA, 2018; pp. 1781–1786. Available online: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/8577769/ (accessed on 21 August 2023).
  42. Finlayson, G.D.; Mackiewicz, M.; Hurlbert, A. Color Correction Using Root-Polynomial Regression. IEEE Trans. Image Process. 2015, 24, 1460–1470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. He, Z.; Shen, C.; Wang, Q.; Zhao, X.; Jiang, H. Mismatching Removal for Feature-Point Matching Based on Triangular Topology Probability Sampling Consensus. Remote Sens. 2022, 14, 706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Tzougas, G.; Karlis, D. An Em Algorithm for Fitting a New Class of Mixed Exponential Regression Models with Varying Dispersion. ASTIN Bull. 2020, 50, 555–583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Gómez, Y.M.; Gallardo, D.I.; Leão, J.; Gómez, H.W. Extended Exponential Regression Model: Diagnostics and Application to Mineral Data. Symmetry 2020, 12, 2042. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. He, Y.; Zhang, Z.; Xiang, R.; Ding, B.; Du, R.; Yin, H.; Chen, Y.; Ba, Y. Monitoring salinity in bare soil based on Sentinel-1/2 image fusion and machine learning. Infrared Phys. Technol. 2023, 131, 104656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Study site localization and landscape visualization of sampling points.
Figure 1. Study site localization and landscape visualization of sampling points.
Atmosphere 14 01514 g001
Figure 2. A color composite image of the Sentinel-1 data backscatter values (σ0) in decibels (dB) from the Kerkennah archipelago (red, VV; green, VH; blue, VH/VV).
Figure 2. A color composite image of the Sentinel-1 data backscatter values (σ0) in decibels (dB) from the Kerkennah archipelago (red, VV; green, VH; blue, VH/VV).
Atmosphere 14 01514 g002
Figure 3. Workflow of proposed mapping of soil salinity and NDVI values of the Kerkennah archipelago.
Figure 3. Workflow of proposed mapping of soil salinity and NDVI values of the Kerkennah archipelago.
Atmosphere 14 01514 g003
Figure 4. Correlation table of different SAR indices with the EC values.
Figure 4. Correlation table of different SAR indices with the EC values.
Atmosphere 14 01514 g004
Figure 5. Scatter Plots of the different regression models used: (a) Exponential; (b) polynomial; (c) linear; (d) random forest.
Figure 5. Scatter Plots of the different regression models used: (a) Exponential; (b) polynomial; (c) linear; (d) random forest.
Atmosphere 14 01514 g005
Figure 6. Soil salinity prediction maps for the study area.
Figure 6. Soil salinity prediction maps for the study area.
Atmosphere 14 01514 g006
Figure 7. Soil salinity prediction maps for the Kerkennah archipelago from 2018 to 2023.
Figure 7. Soil salinity prediction maps for the Kerkennah archipelago from 2018 to 2023.
Atmosphere 14 01514 g007
Figure 8. Temporal evolution of the NDVI values and their spatial distribution (2018–2023).
Figure 8. Temporal evolution of the NDVI values and their spatial distribution (2018–2023).
Atmosphere 14 01514 g008
Table 1. Diversity of salinity levels and soil occupation in the various in situ datasets.
Table 1. Diversity of salinity levels and soil occupation in the various in situ datasets.
Soil Salinity (EC dS/m)Number of SamplesSoil Occupation
Non-saline (0–0.6)45Agricultural parcels (olives, figs, grapes, palms, …)
Very Slight (0.6–2)2No vegetation and high limestone
Moderately Saline (2–4)7Sebkhas and some agricultural parcels
Highly Saline (>4)5Sebkhas
Table 2. Performance metrics of machine learning algorithms.
Table 2. Performance metrics of machine learning algorithms.
AlgorithmCoefficient of Determination (R2)Root Mean Square Error (RMSE)
Polynomial 0.910.28
Random Forest0.840.83
Exponential0.750.47
Linear0.320.79
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Hihi, S.; Katlane, R.; Kilani, B.; Zekri, M.W.; Bensalah, R.; Siewert, C.; Kallel, M. Evaluating Drought Effects on Soil: Innovative Soil Salinity Monitoring via SAR Data, Sentinel-2 Imagery, and Machine Learning Algorithms in Kerkennah Archipelago. Atmosphere 2023, 14, 1514. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos14101514

AMA Style

Hihi S, Katlane R, Kilani B, Zekri MW, Bensalah R, Siewert C, Kallel M. Evaluating Drought Effects on Soil: Innovative Soil Salinity Monitoring via SAR Data, Sentinel-2 Imagery, and Machine Learning Algorithms in Kerkennah Archipelago. Atmosphere. 2023; 14(10):1514. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos14101514

Chicago/Turabian Style

Hihi, Sarra, Rim Katlane, Boubaker Kilani, Mohamed Waddah Zekri, Rafik Bensalah, Christian Siewert, and Monem Kallel. 2023. "Evaluating Drought Effects on Soil: Innovative Soil Salinity Monitoring via SAR Data, Sentinel-2 Imagery, and Machine Learning Algorithms in Kerkennah Archipelago" Atmosphere 14, no. 10: 1514. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos14101514

APA Style

Hihi, S., Katlane, R., Kilani, B., Zekri, M. W., Bensalah, R., Siewert, C., & Kallel, M. (2023). Evaluating Drought Effects on Soil: Innovative Soil Salinity Monitoring via SAR Data, Sentinel-2 Imagery, and Machine Learning Algorithms in Kerkennah Archipelago. Atmosphere, 14(10), 1514. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos14101514

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop