Next Article in Journal
Driving Naive State Induction Using Human Wharton Jelly-Mesenchymal Stem Cell-Derived Conditioned Medium in Rhesus Monkey Embryonic Stem Cells
Previous Article in Journal
Correction: Janjetovic et al. Novel Vitamin D3 Hydroxymetabolites Require Involvement of the Vitamin D Receptor or Retinoic Acid-Related Orphan Receptors for Their Antifibrogenic Activities in Human Fibroblasts. Cells 2024, 13, 239
Previous Article in Special Issue
Immune Cell-Specific and Isoform-Selective Regulation of CD44 in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma Links Lymph Node Variant Loss and Exosomal CD44 to Clinical Outcome in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Natural Products Targeting Angiogenesis and Tumor Microenvironment in Gastrointestinal Malignancies

Faculty of Science, Molecular Biology and Genetics, Zonguldak Bülent Ecevit University, Zonguldak 67100, Türkiye
Cells 2026, 15(7), 623; https://doi.org/10.3390/cells15070623
Submission received: 13 March 2026 / Revised: 27 March 2026 / Accepted: 29 March 2026 / Published: 31 March 2026
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Cancer and Immune System Interactions)

Highlights

What are the main findings?
  • Natural compounds modulate angiogenesis and tumor microenvironment in GI cancers
  • These effects involve hypoxia, inflammation, and fibroblast-related pathways
What are the implications of the main findings?
  • Nanoparticle-based delivery enhances the efficacy of natural compounds
  • Combination therapies improve anticancer outcomes
  • Precision oncology strategies support clinical translation in GI cancers

Abstract

Gastrointestinal malignancies remain among the leading causes of cancer-related morbidity and mortality worldwide, largely due to late diagnosis, aggressive tumor progression, and resistance to conventional therapies. Tumor angiogenesis and the tumor microenvironment (TME) play crucial roles in the initiation, growth, and metastatic dissemination of gastrointestinal cancers. Hypoxia-driven signaling pathways, including hypoxia-inducible factor-1α (HIF-1α), vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β), and inflammatory mediators such as NF-κB and MAPK, are key regulators of these processes. Increasing evidence suggests that natural products derived from medicinal plants and other biological sources may modulate these pathways and exhibit anti-angiogenic, anti-inflammatory, and anti-fibrotic properties. This review summarizes recent findings on natural compounds that influence angiogenesis and tumor microenvironment dynamics through the regulation of molecular pathways involved in hypoxia signaling, extracellular matrix remodeling, fibroblast activation, and inflammatory responses. Compounds such as neotuberostemonine, aloperine, silymarin derivatives, tanshinone IIA, berberine, asiatic acid, and phloretin demonstrate promising biological activities in experimental models by targeting pathways including HIF-1α, PI3K/AKT/mTOR, TGF-β/Smad, and NF-κB signaling. However, further studies focusing on gastrointestinal cancer models and clinical validation are required to translate these preclinical observations into effective therapeutic strategies.

1. Introduction

Gastrointestinal cancers constitute a diverse group of malignancies affecting various divisions of the gastrointestinal tract. These malignancies can be broadly divided into three groups for classification: hepatobiliary (cancers of the pancreas, liver, gallbladder, and bile ducts), lower gastrointestinal (cancers of the colon, rectum, and anus), and upper gastrointestinal (cancers of the esophagus, stomach, and small intestine). Globally, the incidence of various gastrointestinal cancers varies; pancreatic and colorectal cancers are more prevalent in Europe and North America, whereas esophageal, gastric, and liver cancers are more prevalent in Asia [1].
Together, these illnesses cause 35% of all cancer-related deaths and 26% of all cancer incidence worldwide, making them a major contributor to the global cancer burden [1]. Poor prognosis in the presence of metastatic disease and late-stage identification account for a substantial portion of the morbidity and mortality rates of gastrointestinal malignancies, underscoring the need for additional therapeutic options [2].
Angiogenesis is a common driver in the pathophysiology of all gastrointestinal malignancies, despite the fact that the different types show varying degrees of reliance on this process. When a tumor grows larger than 2 mm, the surrounding tissue can no longer sustain it, resulting in a hypoxic tumor microenvironment (TME) that encourages the development of new blood vessels to carry nutrients and oxygen [3]. Angiogenesis is the most important factor in gastrointestinal malignancies of the stomach, liver, colon, and rectum among those previously discussed [4].
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a hypervascular tumor, considering the distinctive vascular supply of the liver. Hepatic artery blood flow accounts for 25% of the total cardiac output during each cardiac cycle [5]. Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), a key signaling molecule in angiogenesis, has been found to be highly expressed in HCC cell lines, tissues, and the blood circulation of patients with HCC, particularly those with aggressive illness [6]. Similarly, individuals with metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC) have much higher VEGF levels, while those with minimal VEGF expression have far higher survival rates [7].
Gastric cancer is generally classified into two major subtypes depending on the Lauren classification, namely, intestinal and diffuse types, both differing in their histological characteristics [8]. The first subtype ordinarily metastasizes to the liver through hematologic spread, whereas the latter subtype depends on peritoneal dissemination. Their angiogenic phenotypes reflect this discrepancy, with the intestinal subtype exhibiting significantly higher VEGF expression as compared to its counterpart [9].

2. The Tumor Microenvironment (TME)

Cancers represent complicated ecosystems consisting of tumor cells and a multitude of noncancerous cells, encapsulated in an altered extracellular matrix. The TME includes diverse immune cells, cancer-associated fibroblasts, endothelial cells, pericytes, various additional tissue-resident cells and the extracellular matrix (ECM). Cancer cells trigger significant cellular, molecular, and physicochemical changes within their host tissues. In order to sustain cancer cell survival, local invasion, and metastatic dissemination, a dynamic and reciprocal connection between cancer cells and TME components forms early in tumor progression. The TME regulates a process that encourages angiogenesis to refill the oxygen/nutrient supply and eliminate metabolic waste in order to overcome a hypoxic and acidic microenvironment. Numerous innate and adaptive immune cells infiltrate tumors, which can have both pro- and anti-tumorigenic actions [10].
The TME constitutes a dynamic and heterogeneous milieu that profoundly influences tumorigenesis, progression, and metastatic dissemination, particularly in gastrointestinal malignancies such as colorectal and gastric adenocarcinomas. Pharmacological modulation of the TME using rationally designed drug candidates represents a compelling therapeutic avenue, as these agents can selectively target key stromal components—including cancer-associated fibroblasts, immunosuppressive myeloid populations, and the extracellular matrix—thereby dismantling the supportive niche that facilitates neoplastic growth. By perturbing TME-driven signaling networks, such compounds not only attenuate tumor proliferation but also potentiate the efficacy of conventional cytotoxic or targeted therapies. Importantly, TME-directed therapeutics can impede metastatic cascade events by inhibiting angiogenesis, normalizing aberrant immune surveillance, and restricting matrix remodeling, thereby curtailing invasion and distant organ colonization. Consequently, leveraging TME-targeted interventions offers a dual advantage in gastrointestinal oncology: direct tumoricidal activity and disruption of microenvironmental processes that underpin metastasis.

3. Angiogenesis

Angiogenesis is a process in which new blood vessels develop from preexisting capillaries and eventually create a complete, regular, and mature vascular network (Figure 1). This arrangement involves the degradation of the basement membrane and the activation, proliferation, and migration of endothelial cells (ECs), regulated by a range of pro-angiogenic and anti-angiogenic factors [11]. Endothelial cells in healthy adults are almost quiescent, and the frequency of mitosis is only 0.5% under normal physiological conditions [12]. Angiogenesis mostly occurs in embryonic development, tissue repair, the menstrual cycle, muscle growth, and organ lining regeneration through a regular (strictly controlled), scope-limited (occurs locally), and short-lived (days, weeks, or months) mode in the body [13,14]. Angiogenesis mainly contributes to the progression of various malignant tumors, such as melanoma, breast cancer [15], colorectal cancer [16], and gastrointestinal cancers [17,18,19].
When tumor cell growth outpaces the capacity of existing vasculature, regions of low oxygen develop and, in response, tumors start producing factors that promote unorganized and immoderate blood vessel formation [20]. This process is mostly regulated by a group of proteins called hypoxia-inducible factors (HIFs), which become stabilized under low oxygen conditions and activate genes participating in blood vessel growth, such as VEGF, fibroblast growth factor (FGF), and platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF) [21]. Overexpression of HIF-1α is commonly seen in gastrointestinal malignancies and is linked to worse clinical outcomes as well as poor response to therapy [22,23].
Oncostatin M was first identified as a growth regulator of tumor cells [24]. Numerous studies were thus focused on cancer research and reported that the levels of oncostatin M were upregulated in various patients with cancer as well as tumor tissues [25,26,27]. However, recent studies revealed that oncostatin M is a pro-inflammatory factor and is released in a variety of cells, including dendritic cells, stimulated T cells, macrophages, monocytes, and neutrophils [28].
Angiopoietin-2 (Ang2) is a member of the Ang family, which plays an important role in angiogenesis during the development and growth of human cancers. Ang2’s role in angiogenesis is generally considered as an antagonist for Ang1, inhibiting Ang1-promoted Tie2 signaling, which is critical for blood vessel maturation and stabilization [29].
Several natural compounds have been reported to interfere with hypoxia-related signaling pathways, particularly the HIF-1α axis, which plays a central role in tumor angiogenesis and adaptation to hypoxic tumor microenvironments. Compounds such as neotuberostemonine and aloperine have been shown to suppress HIF-1α activity and downstream mediators, including TGF-β, FGF2, and PI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling, thereby reducing fibroblast activation, inflammatory signaling, and extracellular matrix remodeling in tumor microenvironments as shown in Figure 2. Although most evidence comes from pulmonary fibrosis or other non-gastrointestinal models, these hypoxia-responsive pathways are broadly conserved across tissues, suggesting potential relevance for gastrointestinal cancers. Nevertheless, the absence of gastrointestinal-specific in vitro, in vivo, or clinical studies represents a key limitation and highlights the need for targeted investigations in GI cancer systems.
Natural compounds represent compounds that have been isolated from higher plants, fungi, and animals. Along with their structural analogues, they have had and continue to have a relevant role in anticancer drug discovery, by offering the advantage of a stable chemical structure with higher specificity for target proteins. The aim of this review is to demonstrate the potential of natural products that directly target factors regulating gastrointestinal inflammation in preclinical studies. The major natural compounds reported to modulate angiogenesis and tumor microenvironment-related pathways are summarized in Table 1.
Neotuberostemonine, a natural alkaloid isolated from Stemona tuberosa (Stemonaceae), suppresses the activation of hypoxia-exposed lung fibroblasts. A recent study showed that PLFs (primary mouse lung fibroblasts) were activated and differentiated after exposure to 1% O2 or treatment with CoCl2 (100 μmol/L), evidenced by markedly increased protein or mRNA expression of HIF-1α, TGF-β, FGF2, α-SMA and Col-1α/3α, which was inhibited after silencing HIF-1α, suggesting that the activation of fibroblasts was HIF-1α-dependent. The results demonstrated that neotuberostemonine (e.g., 10–50 μM) significantly suppressed hypoxia-induced activation of primary mouse lung fibroblasts (PLFs) exposed to 1% O2 or CoCl2 (100 μM) by inhibiting HIF-1α signaling, while the inhibitory action of neotuberostemonine was abrogated by co-treatment with MG132, a proteasome inhibitor. Taken together, these results demonstrate that neotuberostemonine blocks the protein expression of HIF-1α and its downstream factors TGF-β, FGF2 and α-SMA both in hypoxia-exposed fibroblasts and in lung tissues of BLM-treated mice [30].
Cells 15 00623 i001
Naringenin is a flavonoid belonging to the flavanone subclass. It is widely distributed in several Citrus fruits, bergamot, tomatoes and other fruits, and is also found in its glycoside form. Naringenin (10–100 μM) inhibited oncostatin M release in neutrophil-like differentiated dHL-60 cells via suppression of the PI3K/Akt/NF-κB pathway [31].
Clinical research on naringenin remains limited and has primarily focused on safety and pharmacokinetics rather than definitive therapeutic efficacy. In the most well-characterized human study, 18 healthy adults participated in a randomized, controlled, single ascending dose clinical trial in which they received 150 mg, 300 mg, 600 mg, or 900 mg of naringenin from a citrus extract or placebo. This study reported no significant adverse events across doses and demonstrated dose-proportional increases in serum naringenin concentrations over 24 h, establishing an initial safety and pharmacokinetic profile in humans [32].
Aloperine is a quinolizidine alkaloid extracted from Sophora alopecuroides L., primarily used as a free base (pure) in its natural form. A recent study showed that aloperine (10–40 μM) inhibited the proliferation of PDGF-BB-stimulated mouse lung fibroblasts and suppressed PI3K/AKT/mTOR and TGF-β/Smad signaling pathways [33].
The results revealed that aloperine might be ascribed to inhibition of the PI3K/AKT/mTOR and TGF-β/Smad signaling pathways.
Silymarin, the major constituent of milk thistle (Silybum marianum) extract and a mixture of some flavonolignans, significantly reduces serum levels of IL-1 alpha, IL-8, C3 and C4 after 8 weeks compared to pre-treatment levels. Meloxicam significantly elevates serum levels of IL-1 alpha, while IL-8 does not significantly change compared to the pre-treatment value [51]. Silibinin is the most active natural compound of silymarin and has been reported to downregulate MMP2 expression via Jak2/STAT3 pathway and inhibit the migration and invasive potential in MDA-MB-231 cells [34].
Importantly, silibinin has also been evaluated in clinical settings. A phase I clinical trial in prostate cancer patients demonstrated that oral silybin-phytosome was well tolerated and established a recommended phase II dose [35].
Flaig and colleagues (2007) [35] designed a study to assess the toxicity of high-dose silybin-phytosome and recommend a phase II dose. Silybin-phytosome was administered orally to prostate cancer patients, giving 2.5–20 g daily, in three divided doses. Each course was 4 weeks in duration. Thirteen patients received a total of 91 courses of silybin-phytosome. Baseline patient characteristics included: median age of 70 years, median baseline prostate-specific antigen (PSA) of 4.3 ng/mL, and a median ECOG performance status of 0. The most prominent adverse event was hyperbilirubinemia, with grade 1–2 bilirubin elevations in nine of the 13 patients. The only grade 3 toxicity observed was elevation of alanine aminotransferase (ALT) in one patient; no grade 4 toxicity was noted. No objective PSA responses were observed. We conclude that 13 g of oral silybin-phytosome daily, in three divided doses, appears to be well tolerated in patients with advanced prostate cancer and is the recommended phase II dose. Asymptomatic liver toxicity is the most commonly seen adverse event [35].
Cells 15 00623 i002
Tanshinone IIA is a lipophilic diterpene quinone extracted from the Chinese herb Salvia miltiorrhiza Bunge. Studies showed that Tanshinone IIA (10–30 mg/kg, in vivo bleomycin-induced pulmonary fibrosis rat model) suppressed BLM-induced increased expression of TNF-α, IL-1β, IL-6, COX-2, PGE2, malondialdehyde, iNOS and NOS [36].
Baccatin III (BAC) is the precursor of the semisynthesis of paclitaxel, a well-known anticancer drug from the Pacific yew tree. Nie et al. (2019) [37] demonstrated that Baccatin III (5–20 mg/kg, in vivo; 10–50 μM, in vitro fibroblast models) reduced inflammatory infiltration, secretion of the pro-fibrotic mediator TGF-β1, and extracellular matrix deposition in a dose-dependent manner. Moreover, it suppressed the β1 signaling pathway and Smad2/3/TGF [37].
Cells 15 00623 i003
Gentiopicroside is a natural secoiridoid glycoside from gentian species of medicinal plants, such as Gentiana scabra, Gentiana lutea, Swertia pseudochinensis and Swertia mussotii, which are commonly used as medicinal herbs in China and Europe [52,53]. Gentiopicroside (50–200 mg/kg, in vivo bleomycin-induced pulmonary fibrosis mouse model; 10–100 μM, in vitro A549 cells) remarkably ameliorated inflammatory and fibrotic responses in the lungs of pulmonary fibrosis mice, as confirmed by histopathological examinations, including light microscopy and transmission electron microscopy. Furthermore, gentiopicroside significantly decreased the levels of inflammatory cytokines such as TNF-α and IL-1β in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid and reduced the content of hydroxyproline in the lungs. Similarly, gentiopicroside significantly downregulated the expression of TGF-β1 and connective tissue growth factor (CTGF) in the lungs of pulmonary fibrosis mice. Also, gentiopicroside suppressed in vitro epithelial–mesenchymal transition of A549 cells stimulated by TGF-β1 in a dose-dependent manner. These findings suggest that alveolar epithelial cells and TGF-β1 may be the main target cells and molecule of gentiopicroside [38].
Astilbin was reported to ameliorate pulmonary fibrosis via blockade of the Hedgehog signaling pathway through a reduction in pathological scores and collagen deposition, with a decrease in α-SMA and Snail and an increase in E-cadherin and SP-C (surfactan protein-C) (20–80 mg/kg in vivo; 10–50 μM in vitro AEC-II and L929 cells). The expression of mesenchymal markers and the loss of epithelial cell markers were assayed to determine the anti-fibrotic activity of astilbin on TGF-β1-treated AEC-II and L929 cells and bleomycin-treated mice [39].
Cells 15 00623 i004
Astilbin is a dihydroflavonol rhamnoside and a significant natural compound in the treatment of immunologically related diseases. Several studies have reported that astilbin ameliorates experimental autoimmune myasthenia gravis and imiquimod-induced psoriasis-like skin lesions [54,55]. However, astilbin has also been reported to ameliorate cisplatin-induced nephrotoxicity by reducing oxidative stress and inflammation [56]. On the other hand, astilbin significantly inhibited the 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase (HMG-CoA) enzyme on Vero cells [57].
Berberine is a plant quaternary ammonium salt from the group of isoquinoline alkaloids (2,3-methylenedioxy-9, 10-dimethoxyprotoberberine chloride; C20H18NO4+) that is derived from the Chinese medicinal plant Coptis chinensis. It has been identified to have multiple pharmacological activities, including regulating glucose and cholesterol levels, anti-obesity effects and anti-diabetic effects [58].
Orally administered berberine (50–200 mg/kg, in vivo mouse model; 10–50 μM, in vitro fibroblast cells) ameliorates bleomycin-induced pulmonary fibrosis in mice by promoting activation of PPAR-γ and subsequent expression of HGF in the colon [40]. Oral or rectal administration of berberine displayed marked alleviation of bleomycin-induced pulmonary fibrosis in a mouse model. However, the anti-pulmonary fibrosis activity of berberine disappeared when given by an intravenous injection, implying that it functioned in a gut-dependent manner. Additionally, berberine induced both mRNA and protein levels of HGF and PTEN in the colon. Moreover, SU11274, a selective c-Met/HGFR inhibitor, but not BPV, a PTEN inhibitor, abolished the anti-pulmonary fibrosis effect of berberine. On the other hand, berberine preferentially triggered in vitro expression of HGF in fibroblast cells more than epithelial, preadipocyte and endothelial cells. Berberine is able to enter into the protoplasm, activate PPAR-γ and work synergistically with 15-deoxy-Δ12, 14-prostaglandin J2, as shown by an upregulation of CD36 and adipocyte fatty acid-binding protein 2 mRNA expression, nuclear translocation and DNA-binding activity of PPAR-γ both in vitro and in vivo [40].
Importantly, berberine has also been evaluated in clinical trials for preventing colorectal adenoma recurrence and neoplasm occurrence. Berberine has been reported as a safe and effective pharmacological agent that reduces colorectal adenoma recurrence after polypectomy. In a retrospective cohort study that was an extended follow-up of a previous clinical trial during the post-treatment observational phase, Tan and colleagues (2025) [41] aimed to evaluate the long-term protective effects of berberine on adenoma recurrence. Among 895 patients who finished the previous 2-year randomized trial, they recruited 781 patients at seven clinical centers across six provinces in China. The primary outcome was adenoma recurrence. Between 29 December 2018 and 10 October 2024, 648 patients underwent at least one colonoscopy during the follow-up. The protective effects of berberine persist for at least 6 years after treatment cessation, with a lower adenoma recurrence rate (34.7% vs. 52.1%) and a lower neoplasm occurrence rate (63.4% vs. 71.0%). The results revealed that berberine may serve as a potential long-term preventive agent against adenoma recurrence after polypectomy [41].
Asiatic acid was reported to suppress TGF-β1-induced expression of collagen type I, inhibit Smad 2/3 phosphorylation and plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (PAI-1) expression, and elevate Smad 7 protein levels. Additionally, the effects of asiatic acid on keloid fibroblasts could be abrogated by PPAR-γ antagonist GW9662 and by silencing PPAR-γ [42].
Cells 15 00623 i005
Lv and colleagues (2017) [43] showed that asiatic acid treatment (10–40 μM, in vitro; 25–100 mg/kg, in vivo models) effectively protected against LPS/d-GalN-induced fulminant hepatic failure by lessening lethality; decreasing alanine transaminase and aspartate aminotransferase levels, IL-1β, IL-6, and tumor necrosis factor-α production, malondialdehyde formation, myeloperoxidase level and reactive oxygen species generation (i.e., H2O2, NO, and O2); and increasing glutathione and superoxide dismutase contents. Furthermore, asiatic acid administration significantly inhibited MAPK and NF-κB signaling pathway activation via the partial induction of programmed cell death 4 (PDCD4) protein expression [43].
A phase 1 clinical trial (NCT05591027) was conducted to evaluate the safety and tolerability of Centella asiatica extract in humans. This phase I study was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, clinical trial of 48 participants to evaluate safety, tolerability, and biological signatures of the target engagement of brain neuronal viability, oxidative stress, and brain mitochondrial activity of a Centella asiatica water extract product (CAP) in older adults aged 60–85 years with mild cognitive impairment or mild Alzheimer’s disease (AD) [44].
Aucubin is a natural constituent with a monoterpene cyclic ring system, found in a wide range of higher plants such as Aucuba japonica and Plantago asiatica [59]. Aucubin was reported to reduce the intra-pulmonary collagen disposition and inflammatory injury induced by bleomycin. Similarly, aucubin reduced the expression of pro-fibrotic protein transforming growth factor (TGF)-β1 and α-smooth muscle actin (α-SMA) in pulmonary fibrosis mice (20–80 mg/kg, in vivo mouse model; 10–50 μM, in vitro fibroblasts). Moreover, aucubin inhibited the mRNA and protein expression of Ki67 and proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) induced by TGF-β1 and reduced the cell proliferation in murine fibroblast cells, NIH3T3. It also reduced the collagen synthesis and αSMA expression induced by TGF-β1 in fibroblasts [45].
Cells 15 00623 i006
Phloretin is a naturally occurring dihydrochalcone that belongs to the chalcone class of flavonoids. Phloretin was reported to inhibit prostaglandin E2, decrease COX-2 expression, and suppress IL-8, monocyte chemotactic protein 1, and IL-6 production. Furthermore, it also decreased ICAM-1 gene and protein expression and suppressed monocyte adhesion to inflammatory cells (10–100 μM, in vitro A549 cells). Phloretin also significantly blocked Akt and MAPK phosphorylation and decreased NF-κB subunit p65 protein translocation into the nucleus. Moreover, ICAM-1 and COX-2 expression was suppressed by pre-treatment with both MAPK inhibitors and phloretin in inflammatory A549 cells. However, phlorizin, a derivative of phloretin, did not suppress the inflammatory response in IL-1β-stimulated A549 cells. These results suggest that phloretin might have an anti-inflammatory effect by inhibiting pro-inflammatory cytokine, COX-2, and ICAM-1 expression via blocking the NF-κB and MAPK signaling pathways [46]. Phlorizin is the glycosylated derivative (glycoside) of phloretin, which acts as a strong, non-selective SGLT1/SGLT2 inhibitor to block glucose absorption [60].
Tectorigenin and tectoridin are the major constituents of the rhizomes of the iridaceous plant Belamcanda chinensis, well known as a Chinese traditional medicine for the treatment of inflammatory diseases. Tectorigenin and tectoridin were reported to show anti-inflammatory activity towards Raw 264.7 cells activated with IFN-γ/LPS and pre-treated with tectorigenin. Tectorigenin inhibited (10–50 μM, in vitro RAW 264.7 macrophages) the expression of inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS), the production of nitric oxide (NO) and the secretion of IL-1β dose-dependently. It also decreased the expression of cyclooxigenase (COX)-2 and the production of prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) in a dose-dependent manner [47].
Tectoridin was reported as a PGE2 inhibitor due to the inhibition of COX-2 induction in rat peritoneal macrophages stimulated by either protein kinase C activator (12-o-tetradecanoyphorbol 13-acetate: TPA) or the endomembrane Ca2+-ATPase inhibitor (thapsigargin) [48].
Cells 15 00623 i007
Hydroxysafflor yellow A (HSYA) (6-hydroxykaempferol 3,6-di-O-β-glucoside-7-O-β-glucuronide) is an active ingredient of the traditional Chinese herbal medicine Carthamus tinctorius [49]. A recent study showed that treatment with HSYA ameliorated lung inflammation, increased oxygen partial pressure (PaO2) (HSYA 80.0 mg·kg−1) and decreased CO2 partial pressure (PaCO2) (HSYA 53.3, 80.0 mg·kg−1) in lung inflammation and pulmonary fibrosis induced by bleomycin, 53.3–80 mg/kg, in an in vivo rat model. Furthermore, the mRNA expression of TNF-α, IL-1β, and IL-6 and the number of NF-κB p65-positive cells were lower in HSYA 53.3 and 80.0 mg·kg−1 groups than those in the model group [50].
In addition to their biological activities, consideration of the origin and pharmaceutical forms of the natural compounds discussed in this review is essential. Most of these bioactive molecules are primarily isolated from higher plants, including Stemona tuberosa (neotuberostemonine), Sophora alopecuroides (aloperine), Silybum marianum (silymarin/silibinin), Salvia miltiorrhiza (tanshinone IIA), Coptis chinensis (berberine), and Centella asiatica (asiatic acid). In terms of availability, many of these compounds are commercially marketed as standardized plant extracts or purified natural products, particularly as dietary supplements or herbal formulations. However, certain compounds—especially those with well-established pharmacological relevance—are also produced as semi-synthetic or fully synthetic derivatives to enhance their bioavailability, stability, and pharmacokinetic profiles. Therefore, both naturally derived and synthetic forms of these compounds may be encountered in experimental and clinical settings, which should be taken into account when interpreting their therapeutic potential. This distinction may have important implications for their pharmacological application and clinical translation, as discussed in the following section.

4. Combination Strategies of Natural Compounds with Conventional Chemotherapeutics in Gastrointestinal Malignancies

The combination of natural bioactive compounds with conventional chemotherapeutic agents has emerged as a promising strategy to enhance therapeutic efficacy and overcome drug resistance in gastrointestinal malignancies. Standard treatments such as 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and oxaliplatin remain the backbone of chemotherapy for colorectal and gastric cancers; however, their clinical utility is often limited by systemic toxicity, intrinsic or acquired resistance, and tumor microenvironment-mediated protective mechanisms. In this context, phytochemicals with multi-targeted biological activities may serve as effective adjuvants that sensitize tumor cells to chemotherapy while simultaneously modulating the TME [61].
A growing body of preclinical evidence indicates that several natural compounds discussed in this review can potentiate the antitumor activity of conventional drugs. For instance, berberine has been shown to enhance the cytotoxic effects of 5-FU in colorectal cancer models by modulating key survival pathways, such as PI3K/AKT, and by inducing apoptosis through mitochondrial-dependent mechanisms. In addition, berberine has been reported to suppress NF-κB signaling, thereby reducing inflammation-associated chemoresistance and attenuating pro-survival signaling within the TME [62].
Similarly, silibinin, the major active constituent of silymarin, has demonstrated the ability to increase chemosensitivity to both 5-FU and oxaliplatin. Mechanistically, silibinin inhibits the STAT3 and NF-κB signaling pathways, leading to reduced tumor cell proliferation, decreased angiogenic signaling, and impaired metastatic potential. Importantly, silibinin-mediated downregulation of MMPs may further limit extracellular matrix remodeling and tumor invasion, thereby complementing the cytotoxic effects of chemotherapy [63,64].
Flavonoids such as naringenin and phloretin have also been reported to exert synergistic effects with chemotherapeutic agents [65,66]. Naringenin enhances drug-induced apoptosis and reduces oxidative stress-mediated resistance by modulating the PI3K/AKT and MAPK signaling pathways. Phloretin, through inhibition of NF-κB and Akt signaling, contributes to the suppression of inflammatory cytokine production and may sensitize tumor cells to chemotherapeutic stress [65,66]. These effects are particularly relevant in gastrointestinal cancers, where chronic inflammation plays a central role in tumor progression and therapy resistance as shown in Figure 3.
Another important aspect of combination therapy is the modulation of hypoxia-related signaling pathways. Natural compounds such as neotuberostemonine and aloperine, which inhibit HIF-1α activity, may improve the response to chemotherapy by reducing hypoxia-driven drug resistance. Since hypoxic regions within tumors are often less responsive to cytotoxic agents, targeting HIF-1α and its downstream mediators (e.g., VEGF, TGF-β) may enhance drug delivery and efficacy by normalizing tumor vasculature and reducing angiogenesis [30].
Furthermore, compounds such as asiatic acid and gentiopicroside, which regulate TGF-β/Smad signaling, may counteract chemotherapy-induced epithelial–mesenchymal transition (EMT) and fibrosis, both of which are associated with drug resistance and metastatic progression. By attenuating stromal activation and fibroblast-mediated protective niches, these natural agents may disrupt the supportive microenvironment that enables tumor survival during chemotherapy [67].
Importantly, recent experimental studies have demonstrated that natural compounds can directly potentiate oxaliplatin activity. For example, polydatin has been shown to enhance oxaliplatin-induced cytotoxicity in colon cancer cells by promoting reactive oxygen species (ROS) accumulation, DNA damage, and endoplasmic reticulum stress-mediated apoptosis [68]. These findings support the concept that phytochemicals can act as chemosensitizers through multiple converging molecular mechanisms.
In addition to enhancing efficacy, combination strategies may also allow dose reduction in chemotherapeutic agents, thereby minimizing adverse effects while maintaining therapeutic benefit. This is particularly relevant for oxaliplatin-based regimens, where cumulative neurotoxicity remains a major clinical limitation [69]. Despite these promising findings, most available evidence is still derived from preclinical models. Therefore, well-designed gastrointestinal cancer-specific studies and clinical trials are required to validate these combinatorial approaches and to determine optimal dosing strategies, pharmacokinetic interactions, and safety profiles.
Overall, the integration of natural compounds with conventional chemotherapeutics represents a rational and multifaceted therapeutic strategy. By simultaneously targeting tumor cells and the tumor microenvironment—including angiogenesis, inflammation, hypoxia signaling, and stromal interactions—these combination approaches hold significant potential to improve treatment outcomes in gastrointestinal malignancies.

5. Discussion

Angiogenesis and tumor microenvironment (TME) remodeling represent central hallmarks of gastrointestinal tumor progression. The dynamic interaction between tumor cells and stromal components—including immune cells, cancer-associated fibroblasts, endothelial cells, and extracellular matrix elements—creates a complex microenvironment that promotes tumor growth, invasion, and metastatic dissemination. Hypoxia is a critical driver of these processes, primarily through the activation of hypoxia-responsive signaling pathways such as HIF-1α, VEGF, TGF-β, NF-κB, and MAPK. These pathways collectively regulate endothelial cell proliferation, inflammatory signaling, fibroblast activation, and extracellular matrix remodeling, thereby establishing a pro-angiogenic and tumor-supportive microenvironment.
Importantly, emerging evidence supports the therapeutic potential of combining natural compounds with conventional chemotherapeutic agents in gastrointestinal malignancies. Combinatorial strategies may enhance chemosensitivity to agents such as 5-fluorouracil and oxaliplatin by targeting multiple oncogenic pathways, including PI3K/AKT, NF-κB, and hypoxia-related signaling. These findings further highlight the relevance of phytochemicals as adjuvant agents capable of modulating both tumor cells and the tumor microenvironment, thereby improving overall treatment efficacy.
Many mechanistic studies have utilized non-oncological models, particularly pulmonary fibrosis systems, which may not fully recapitulate the complexity of gastrointestinal tumors. Although these models provide valuable insights into hypoxia-responsive and fibrotic pathways, their direct translational relevance to gastrointestinal oncology remains uncertain. Several natural compounds reviewed here have reached early clinical studies, offering preliminary data on safety and pharmacokinetics; for example, naringenin is well tolerated in humans with predictable oral pharmacokinetics. Nonetheless, gastrointestinal-specific mechanistic and clinical investigations are essential to validate these findings and to guide future translational efforts in GI cancer research.
Importantly, several natural compounds discussed in this review have already been evaluated in early clinical studies, providing preliminary insights into their safety and pharmacokinetic profiles. For example, clinical investigations have demonstrated that naringenin is well tolerated in humans and exhibits predictable pharmacokinetics following oral administration. Similarly, silybin-phytosome has been evaluated in a phase I clinical trial in prostate cancer patients, where high-dose administration was generally well tolerated. In addition, long-term follow-up data from clinical trials investigating berberine have demonstrated its potential role in reducing colorectal adenoma recurrence after polypectomy. These findings highlight the translational potential of natural products and emphasize the need for further clinical evaluation in gastrointestinal malignancies.
Future research should therefore focus on several key areas. First, mechanistic studies using gastrointestinal tumor-specific cellular and animal models are needed to better define the anti-angiogenic and microenvironment-modulating properties of these compounds. Second, the integration of natural compounds with existing therapeutic strategies—including chemotherapy, targeted therapies, and immunotherapy—may provide synergistic effects and improve treatment outcomes. Third, advances in drug delivery technologies, such as nanoparticle-based formulations and targeted drug delivery systems, may overcome limitations related to poor bioavailability and pharmacokinetic instability that often affect plant-derived compounds.
Finally, well-designed randomized clinical trials will be essential to determine whether the promising biological activities observed in experimental studies can be translated into clinically meaningful benefits for patients with gastrointestinal malignancies. Integrating natural product research with translational oncology approaches may ultimately lead to the development of novel multi-targeted therapeutic strategies that simultaneously disrupt tumor angiogenesis and microenvironmental support systems.
In addition, the application of precision oncology approaches could enable patient-specific selection of natural compounds and combination therapies, maximizing therapeutic efficacy while minimizing off-target effects. Coupling these strategies with nanoparticle-based delivery systems may further enhance compound bioavailability and tumor-targeted activity, accelerating their clinical translation in gastrointestinal cancers.

6. Conclusions

Natural products represent a rich and biologically diverse source of compounds capable of modulating key signaling pathways involved in angiogenesis and tumor microenvironment regulation. The evidence summarized in this review demonstrates that multiple natural compounds can influence the central molecular pathways, inflammatory responses, and stromal activation that contribute to gastrointestinal tumor progression.
Although the majority of available studies remain limited to preclinical experimental models, the growing number of early clinical investigations evaluating compounds such as naringenin, silybin derivatives, and berberine provides encouraging evidence for their safety and translational potential. In particular, clinical studies demonstrating reduced colorectal adenoma recurrence following berberine treatment highlight the possibility that natural products may contribute not only to therapeutic interventions but also to chemoprevention strategies in gastrointestinal cancers.
Nevertheless, substantial challenges remain before these compounds can be integrated into routine clinical practice. Future studies should prioritize gastrointestinal cancer-specific experimental models, comprehensive pharmacokinetic analyses, and well-designed randomized clinical trials to establish their efficacy and safety profiles. In addition, combination approaches integrating natural compounds with current anti-angiogenic therapies, immunotherapy, or targeted agents may represent promising strategies to enhance therapeutic outcomes.
Overall, continued interdisciplinary research combining natural product pharmacology, tumor microenvironment biology, and clinical oncology will be essential to fully explore the therapeutic potential of natural compounds. Such efforts may ultimately facilitate the development of novel multi-targeted treatment strategies aimed at simultaneously disrupting angiogenesis and tumor-supportive microenvironmental processes in gastrointestinal malignancies.
Future research should prioritize gastrointestinal-specific investigations to validate the mechanistic effects of natural compounds on tumor microenvironments. Specifically, in vitro studies using GI cancer cell lines and patient-derived organoids, as well as in vivo studies employing gastrointestinal PDX models, are needed. Translational studies should focus on pharmacokinetics, bioavailability, and combinatorial strategies with existing chemotherapeutics to assess efficacy and safety in GI contexts. Early-phase clinical trials targeting gastrointestinal cancers are warranted for promising candidates like naringenin and neotuberostemonine, with endpoints including tumor progression, angiogenesis, and immune modulation. Additionally, prioritization of molecular targets based on pathway specificity and preclinical efficacy will guide the rational selection of compounds for clinical development.

Funding

This research was funded by Zonguldak Bülent Ecevit University, Coordination of Scientific Research, grant numbers 2024-33496813-02 and 2024-33496813-01.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

No new data were created or analyzed in this study.

Acknowledgments

The figures were created using CorelDraw Graphical Suite 2025, and the 2D chemical structures were drawn using ChemDraw Professional 16.1.

Conflicts of Interest

The author declares no conflicts of interest.

Abbreviations

The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript:
TMETumor microenvironment
HCCHepatocellular carcinoma
VEGFVascular endothelial growth factor
TGF-βTransforming growth factor-beta
MCCMetastatic colorectal cancer
HIF-1αHypoxia-inducible factor-1alpha
ECMExtracellular matrix
HIFsHypoxia-inducible factors
Ang1Angiopoietin-1
Ang2Angiopoietin-2
ECsEndothelial cells
FGFFibroblast growth factor
AktProtein kinase B
PI3KPhosphatidylinositol 3-kinase
mTORMammalian target of rapamycin
ILInterleukin
PLFsPrimary mouse lung fibroblasts
PaO2Oxygen partial pressure
HSYAHydroxysafflor yellow A
COXCyclooxigenase
NF-κBNuclear factor kappa B
CTGFConnective tissue growth factor
PSAProstate-specific antigen
HMG-CoA3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase
PPAR-γPeroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma
PDGFPlatelet-derived growth factor
MMPs Matrix metalloproteinases
CAFsCancer-associated fibroblasts

References

  1. Arnold, M.; Abnet, C.C.; Neale, R.E.; Vignat, J.; Giovannucci, E.L.; McGlynn, K.A.; Bray, F. Global Burden of 5 Major Types of Gastrointestinal Cancer. Gastroenterology 2020, 159, 335–349.e15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Cotan, H.T.; Emilescu, R.A.; Iaciu, C.I.; Orlov-Slavu, C.M.; Olaru, M.C.; Popa, A.M.; Jinga, M.; Nitipir, C.; Schreiner, O.D.; Ciobanu, R.C. Prognostic and Predictive Determinants of Colorectal Cancer: A Comprehensive Review. Cancers 2024, 16, 3928. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Chen, Z.; Han, F.; Du, Y.; Shi, H.; Zhou, W. Hypoxic microenvironment in cancer: Molecular mechanisms and therapeutic interventions. Signal Transduct. Target. Ther. 2023, 8, 70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Li, J.; Li, Z.; Wang, K. Targeting angiogenesis in gastrointestinal tumors: Strategies from vascular disruption to vascular normalization and promotion strategies angiogenesis strategies in GI tumor therapy. Front. Immunol. 2025, 16, 1550752. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Harkins, J.M.; Ahmad, B. Anatomy, Abdomen and Pelvis, Portal Venous System (Hepatic Portal System). In StatPearls [Internet]; StatPearls Publishing: Treasure Island, FL, USA, 2023. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  6. Federico, P.; Giunta, E.F.; Tufo, A.; Tovoli, F.; Petrillo, A.; Daniele, B. Resistance to Antiangiogenic Therapy in Hepatocellular Carcinoma: From Molecular Mechanisms to Clinical Impact. Cancers 2022, 14, 6245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Martins, S.F.; Reis, R.M.; Rodrigues, A.M.; Baltazar, F.; Filho, A.L. Role of endoglin and VEGF family expression in colorectal cancer prognosis and anti-angiogenic therapies. World J. Clin. Oncol. 2011, 2, 272–280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Lee, J.H.; Chang, K.K.; Yoon, C.; Tang, L.H.; Strong, V.E.; Yoon, S.S. Lauren Histologic Type Is the Most Important Factor Associated with Pattern of Recurrence Following Resection of Gastric Adenocarcinoma. Ann. Surg. 2018, 267, 105–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Kitadai, Y. Angiogenesis and Lymphangiogenesis of Gastric Cancer. J. Oncol. 2010, 2010, 468725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. de Visser, K.E.; Joyce, J.A. The evolving tumor microenvironment: From cancer initiation to metastatic outgrowth. Cancer Cell. 2023, 41, 374–403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Larionova, I.; Kazakova, E.; Gerashchenko, T.; Kzhyshkowska, J. New angiogenic regulators produced by TAMs: Perspective for pargeting tumor angiogenesis. Cancers 2021, 13, 3253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Duran, C.L.; Howell, D.W.; Dave, J.M.; Smith, R.L.; Torrie, M.E.; Essner, J.J.; Bayless, K.J. Molecular Regulation of Sprouting Angiogenesis. Compr. Physiol. 2017, 8, 153–235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Teleanu, R.I.; Chircov, C.; Grumezescu, A.M.; Teleanu, D.M. Tumor angiogenesis and anti-angiogenic strategies for cancer treatment. J. Clin. Med. 2019, 9, 84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Folkman, J. Angiogenesis: An organizing principle for drug discovery? Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2007, 6, 273–286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Khosravi Shahi, P.; Soria Lovelle, A.; Pérez Manga, G. Tumoral angiogenesis and breast cancer. Clin. Transl. Oncol. 2009, 11, 138–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Hall, R.D.; Le, T.M.; Haggstrom, D.E.; Gentzler, R.D. Angiogenesis inhibition as a therapeutic strategy in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Transl. Lung Cancer Res. 2015, 4, 515–523. [Google Scholar]
  17. Poon, R.T.; Fan, S.T.; Wong, J. Clinical significance of angiogenesis in gastrointestinal cancers: A target for novel prognostic and therapeutic approaches. Ann. Surg. 2003, 238, 9–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Hsieh, H.L.; Tsai, M.M. Tumor progression-dependent angiogenesis in gastric cancer and its potential application. World J. Gastrointest. Oncol. 2019, 11, 686–704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Andreuzzi, E.; Capuano, A.; Poletto, E.; Pivetta, E.; Fejza, A.; Favero, A.; Doliana, R.; Cannizzaro, R.; Spessotto, P.; Mongiat, M. Role of Extracellular Matrix in Gastrointestinal Cancer-Associated Angiogenesis. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 3686. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Lv, X.; Li, J.; Zhang, C.; Hu, T.; Li, S.; He, S.; Yan, H.; Tan, Y.; Lei, M.; Wen, M.; et al. The role of hypoxia-inducible factors in tumor angiogenesis and cell metabolism. Genes Dis. 2016, 4, 19–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Liao, D.; Johnson, R.S. Hypoxia: A key regulator of angiogenesis in cancer. Cancer Metastasis Rev. 2007, 26, 281–290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Baba, Y.; Nosho, K.; Shima, K.; Irahara, N.; Chan, A.T.; Meyerhardt, J.A.; Chung, D.C.; Giovannucci, E.L.; Fuchs, C.S.; Ogino, S. HIF1A overexpression is associated with poor prognosis in a cohort of 731 colorectal cancers. Am. J. Pathol. 2010, 176, 2292–2301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Xu, K.; Zhan, Y.; Yuan, Z.; Qiu, Y.; Wang, H.; Fan, G.; Wang, J.; Li, W.; Cao, Y.; Shen, X.; et al. Hypoxia Induces Drug Resistance in Colorectal Cancer through the HIF-1α/miR-338-5p/IL-6 Feedback Loop. Mol. Ther. 2019, 27, 1810–1824. [Google Scholar]
  24. Zarling, J.M.; Shoyab, M.; Marquardt, H.; Hanson, M.B.; Lioubin, M.N.; Todaro, G.J. Oncostatin M: A growth regulator produced by differentiated histiocytic lymphoma cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1986, 83, 9739–9743. [Google Scholar]
  25. Yang, X.; Shao, C.; Duan, L.; Hou, X.; Huang, Y.; Gao, L.; Zong, C.; Liu, W.; Jiang, J.; Ye, F.; et al. Oncostatin M promotes hepatic progenitor cell activation and hepatocarcinogenesis via macrophage-derived tumor necrosis factor-α. Cancer Lett. 2021, 517, 46–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Di Maira, G.; Foglia, B.; Napione, L.; Turato, C.; Maggiora, M.; Sutti, S.; Novo, E.; Alvaro, M.; Autelli, R.; Colombatto, S.; et al. Oncostatin M is overexpressed in NASH-related hepatocellular carcinoma and promotes cancer cell invasiveness and angiogenesis. J. Pathol. 2022, 257, 82–95. [Google Scholar]
  27. Chen, M.; Ren, R.; Lin, W.; Xiang, L.; Zhao, Z.; Shao, B. Exploring the oncostatin M (OSM) feed-forward signaling of glioblastoma via STAT3 in pan-cancer analysis. Cancer Cell Int. 2021, 21, 565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Liu, J.; Zhong, Y.; Liu, H.; Yang, H.; Lu, P.; Shi, Y.; Wang, X.; Zheng, W.; Yu, X.; Xu, Y.; et al. Oncostatin M sensitizes keratinocytes to UVB-induced inflammation via GSDME-mediated pyroptosis. J. Dermatol. Sci. 2021, 104, 95–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Hu, B.; Cheng, S.Y. Angiopoietin-2: Development of inhibitors for cancer therapy. Curr. Oncol. Rep. 2009, 11, 111–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Lv, X.M.; Li, M.D.; Cheng, S.; Liu, B.L.; Liu, K.; Zhang, C.F.; Xu, X.H.; Zhang, M. Neotuberostemonine inhibits the differentiation of lung fibroblasts into myofibroblasts in mice by regulating HIF-1α signaling. Acta Pharmacol. Sin. 2018, 39, 1501–1512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Han, N.-R.; Park, H.-J.; Ko, S.-G.; Moon, P.-D. Naringenin, a Food Bioactive Compound, Reduces Oncostatin M Through Blockade of PI3K/Akt/NF-κB Signal Pathway in Neutrophil-like Differentiated HL-60 Cells. Foods 2025, 14, 102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Rebello, C.J.; Beyl, R.A.; Lertora, J.J.L.; Greenway, F.L.; Ravussin, E.; Ribnicky, D.M.; Poulev, A.; Kennedy, B.J.; Castro, H.F.; Campagna, S.R.; et al. Safety and pharmacokinetics of naringenin: A randomized, controlled, single-ascending-dose clinical trial. Diabetes Obes. Metab. 2020, 22, 91–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Yin, W.; Han, J.; Zhang, Z.; Han, Z.; Wang, S. Aloperine Protects Mice against Bleomycin-induced Pulmonary Fibrosis by Attenuating Fibroblast Proliferation and Differentiation. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 6265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Byun, H.J.; Darvin, P.; Kang, D.Y.; Sp, N.; Joung, Y.H.; Park, J.H.; Kim, S.J.; Yang, Y.M. Silibinin downregulates MMP2 expression via Jak2/STAT3 pathway and inhibits the migration and invasive potential in MDA-MB-231 cells. Oncol. Rep. 2017, 37, 3270–3278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Flaig, T.W.; Gustafson, D.L.; Su, L.J.; Zirrolli, J.A.; Crighton, F.; Harrison, G.S.; Pierson, A.S.; Agarwal, R.; Glodé, L.M. A phase I and pharmacokinetic study of silybin-phytosome in prostate cancer patients. Investig. New Drugs 2007, 25, 139–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. He, H.; Tang, H.; Gao, L.; Wu, Y.; Feng, Z.; Lin, H.; Wu, T. Tanshinone IIA attenuates bleomycin-induced pulmonary fibrosis in rats. Mol. Med. Rep. 2015, 11, 4190–4196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Nie, Y.; Zhang, D.; Qian, F.; Wu, Y. Baccatin III ameliorates bleomycin-induced pulmonary fibrosis via suppression of TGF-β1 production and TGF-β1-induced fibroblast differentiation. Int. Immunopharmacol. 2019, 74, 105696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Chen, C.; Wang, Y.Y.; Wang, Y.X.; Cheng, M.Q.; Yin, J.B.; Zhang, X.; Hong, Z.P. Gentiopicroside ameliorates bleomycin-induced pulmonar y fibrosis in mice via inhibiting inflammatory and fibrotic process. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2018, 495, 2396–2403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Zhang, J.; Liu, H.; Song, C.; Zhang, J.; Wang, Y.; Lv, C.; Song, X. Astilbin ameliorates pulmonary fibrosis via blockade of Hedgehog signaling pathway. Pulm. Pharmacol. Ther. 2018, 50, 19–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Guan, C.; Qiao, S.; Lv, Q.; Cao, N.; Wang, K.; Dai, Y.; Wei, Z. Orally administered berberine ameliorates bleomycin-induced pulmonary fibrosis in mice through promoting activation of PPAR-γ and subsequent expression of HGF in colons. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 2018, 343, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Tan, Y.J.; Zou, T.H.; Yu, K.; Sheng, J.Q.; Jin, P.; Zhang, M.J.; Zou, X.P.; Dou, X.T.; Liu, S.D.; Huang, S.H.; et al. Berberine for preventing colorectal adenoma recurrence and neoplasm occurrence: 6-Year follow-up of a randomized clinical trial. Cell Rep. Med. 2025, 6, 102293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Bian, D.; Zhang, J.; Wu, X.; Dou, Y.; Yang, Y.; Tan, Q.; Xia, Y.; Gong, Z.; Dai, Y. Asiatic acid isolated from Centella asiatica inhibits TGF-β1-induced collagen expression in human keloid fibroblasts via PPAR-γ activation. Int. J. Biol. Sci. 2013, 9, 1032–1042. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Lv, H.; Qi, Z.; Wang, S.; Feng, H.; Deng, X.; Ci, X. Asiatic Acid Exhibits Anti-inflammatory and Antioxidant Activities against Lipopolysaccharide and d-Galactosamine-Induced Fulminant Hepatic Failure. Front. Immunol. 2017, 8, 785. [Google Scholar]
  44. Wright, K.M.; Bollen, M.; David, J.; Speers, A.B.; Brandes, M.S.; Gray, N.E.; Alcázar Magaña, A.; McClure, C.; Stevens, J.F.; Maier, C.S.; et al. Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Key Components of a Standardized Centella asiatica Product in Cognitively Impaired Older Adults: A Phase 1, Double-Blind, Randomized Clinical Trial. Antioxidants 2022, 11, 215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Zhou, Y.; Li, P.; Duan, J.X.; Liu, T.; Guan, X.X.; Mei, W.X.; Liu, Y.P.; Sun, G.Y.; Wan, L.; Zhong, W.J.; et al. Aucubin Alleviates Bleomycin-Induced Pulmonary Fibrosis in a Mouse Model. Inflammation 2017, 40, 2062–2073. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Huang, W.C.; Wu, S.J.; Tu, R.S.; Liou, C.J. Phloretin inhibits interleukin-1β-induced COX-2 and ICAM-1 expression through inhibition of MAPK, Akt, and NF-κB signaling in human lung epithelial cells. Food Funct. 2015, 6, 1960–1967. [Google Scholar]
  47. Pan, C.H.; Kim, E.S.; Jung, S.H.; Nho, C.W.; Lee, J.K. Tectorigenin inhibits IFN-γ/LPS-induced inflammatory responses in murine macrophage RAW 264.7 cells. Arch. Pharmacal Res. 2008, 31, 1447–1456. [Google Scholar]
  48. Kim, Y.P.; Yamada, M.; Lim, S.S.; Lee, S.H.; Ryu, N.; Shin, K.H.; Ohuchi, K. Inhibition by tectorigenin and tectoridin of prostaglandin E2 production and cyclooxygenase-2 induction in rat peritoneal macrophages. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1999, 1438, 399–407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Fan, L.; Zhao, H.Y.; Xu, M.; Xia, P.; Zhou, H.; Guo, D.A. Qualitative evaluation and quantitative determination of 10 major active components in Carthamus tinctorius L. by high-performance liquid chromatography coupled with diode array detector. J. Chromatogr. A 2009, 1216, 2063–2070. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Jin, M.; Wang, L.; Wu, Y.; Zang, B.X.; Tan, L. Protective effect of hydroxysafflor yellow A on bleomycin- induced pulmonary inflammation and fibrosis in rats. Chin. J. Integr. Med. 2018, 24, 32–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Hussain, S.A.; Jassim, N.A.; Numan, I.T.; Al-Khalifa, I.I.; Abdullah, T.A. Anti-inflammatory activity of silymarin in patients with knee osteoarthritis. A comparative study with piroxicam and meloxicam. Saudi Med. J. 2009, 30, 98–103. [Google Scholar]
  52. Tan, R.X.; Kong, L.D. Secoiridoids from Gentiana siphonantha. Phytochemistry 1997, 46, 1035–1038. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Kondo, Y.; Takano, F.; Hojo, H. Suppression of Chemically and Immunologically Induced Hepatic Injuries by Gentiopicroside in Mice. Planta Med. 1994, 60, 414–416. [Google Scholar]
  54. Di, T.T.; Ruan, Z.T.; Zhao, J.X.; Wang, Y.; Liu, X.; Wang, Y.; Li, P. Astilbin inhibits Th17 cell differentiation and ameliorates imiquimod-induced psoriasis-like skin lesions in BALB/c mice via Jak3/Stat3 signaling pathway. Int. Immunopharmacol. 2016, 32, 32–38. [Google Scholar]
  55. Meng, Q.F.; Zhang, Z.; Wang, Y.J.; Chen, W.; Li, F.F.; Yue, L.T.; Zhang, C.J.; Li, H.; Zhang, M.; Wang, C.C.; et al. Astilbin ameliorates experimental autoimmune myasthenia gravis by decreased Th17 cytokines and up-regulated T regulatory cells. J. Neuroimmunol. 2016, 298, 138–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Wang, S.W.; Xu, Y.; Weng, Y.Y.; Fan, X.Y.; Bai, Y.F.; Zheng, X.Y.; Lou, L.J.; Zhang, F. Astilbin ameliorates cisplatin-induced nephrotoxicity through reducing oxidative stress and inflammation. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2018, 114, 227–236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Chen, T.H.; Liu, J.C.; Chang, J.J.; Tsai, M.F.; Hsieh, M.H.; Chan, P. The in vitro inhibitory effect of flavonoid astilbin on 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase on Vero cells. Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi (Taipei) 2001, 64, 382–387. [Google Scholar]
  58. Hu, X.; Zhang, Y.; Xue, Y.; Zhang, Z.; Wang, J. Berberine is a potential therapeutic agent for metabolic syndrome via brown adipose tissue activation and metabolism regulation. Am. J. Transl. Res. 2018, 10, 3322–3329. [Google Scholar]
  59. Park, K.S. Aucubin, a naturally occurring iridoid glycoside inhibits TNF-alpha-induced inflammatory responses through suppression of NF-kappaB activation in 3T3-L1 adipocytes. Cytokine 2013, 62, 407–412. [Google Scholar]
  60. Martus, G.; Bergling, K.; Öberg, C.M. Dual SGLT1/SGLT2 inhibitor phlorizin reduces glucose transport in experimental peritoneal dialysis. Perit. Dial. Int. 2023, 43, 145–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Barathan, M.; Zulpa, A.K.; Ng, S.L.; Lokanathan, Y.; Ng, M.H.; Law, J.X. Innovative strategies to combat 5-fluorouracil resistance in colorectal cancer: The role of phytochemicals and extracellular vesicles. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25, 7470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Almatroodi, S.A.; Alsahli, M.A.; Rahmani, A.H. Berberine: An Important Emphasis on Its Anticancer Effects through Modulation of Various Cell Signaling Pathways. Molecules 2022, 27, 5889. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Molavi, O.; Narimani, F.; Asiaee, F.; Sharifi, S.; Tarhriz, V.; Shayanfar, A.; Hejazi, M.; Lai, R. Silibinin sensitizes chemo-resistant breast cancer cells to chemotherapy. Pharm. Biol. 2017, 55, 729–739. [Google Scholar]
  64. Raina, K.; Kumar, S.; Dhar, D.; Agarwal, R. Silibinin and colorectal cancer chemoprevention: A comprehensive review on mechanisms and efficacy. J. Biomed. Res. 2016, 30, 452–465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Noori, S.; Rezaei Tavirani, M.; Deravi, N.; Mahboobi Rabbani, M.I.; Zarghi, A. Naringenin Enhances the Anti-Cancer Effect of Cyclophosphamide against MDA-MB-231 Breast Cancer Cells Via Targeting the STAT3 Signaling Pathway. Iran. J. Pharm. Res. 2020, 19, 122–133. [Google Scholar]
  66. Tuli, H.S.; Rath, P.; Chauhan, A.; Ramniwas, S.; Vashishth, K.; Varol, M.; Jaswal, V.S.; Haque, S.; Sak, K. Phloretin, as a Potent Anticancer Compound: From Chemistry to Cellular Interactions. Molecules 2022, 27, 8819. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Tang, L.X.; He, R.H.; Yang, G.; Tan, J.J.; Zhou, L.; Meng, X.M.; Huang, X.R.; Lan, H.Y. Asiatic acid inhibits liver fibrosis by blocking TGF-beta/Smad signaling in vivo and in vitro. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e31350. [Google Scholar]
  68. Zhao, Q.; Zhang, Y.; Liu, J.; Chen, P.; Onga, A.; Cho, N.; Cui, R.; Zheng, C. Polydatin enhances oxaliplatin-induced cell death by activating ROS-mediated DNA damage and ER stress in colon cancer cells. Front. Pharmacol. 2025, 15, 1532695. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Martinez-Balibrea, E.; Martínez-Cardús, A.; Ginés, A.; Ruiz de Porras, V.; Moutinho, C.; Layos, L.; Manzano, J.L.; Bugés, C.; Bystrup, S.; Esteller, M.; et al. Tumor-related molecular mechanisms of oxaliplatin resistance. Cancers 2022, 14, 316. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. Immune cell-mediated regulation of tumor angiogenesis in the tumor microenvironment. Various immune cells—including tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs), myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs), mast cells, T cells, B cells, eosinophils, dendritic cells, neutrophils (TANs), natural killer (NK) cells, and tumor-associated endothelial/monocytic cells (TEMs)—contribute to tumor angiogenesis by secreting pro-angiogenic cytokines, chemokines, and growth factors such as VEGF (vascular endothelial growth factor), FGF (fibroblast growth factor), PDGF (platelet-derived growth factor), TGF-β (transforming growth factor), IL-6 (interleukin), IL-8, and MMPs (matrix metalloproteinases). These mediators promote blood vessel formation, tumor growth, and remodeling of the tumor microenvironment.
Figure 1. Immune cell-mediated regulation of tumor angiogenesis in the tumor microenvironment. Various immune cells—including tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs), myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs), mast cells, T cells, B cells, eosinophils, dendritic cells, neutrophils (TANs), natural killer (NK) cells, and tumor-associated endothelial/monocytic cells (TEMs)—contribute to tumor angiogenesis by secreting pro-angiogenic cytokines, chemokines, and growth factors such as VEGF (vascular endothelial growth factor), FGF (fibroblast growth factor), PDGF (platelet-derived growth factor), TGF-β (transforming growth factor), IL-6 (interleukin), IL-8, and MMPs (matrix metalloproteinases). These mediators promote blood vessel formation, tumor growth, and remodeling of the tumor microenvironment.
Cells 15 00623 g001
Figure 2. Schematic representation of natural compounds targeting angiogenesis and tumor microenvironment-related signaling pathways in gastrointestinal malignancies. Through the regulation of these pathways, natural compounds suppress pro-angiogenic signaling, inflammatory responses, fibroblast activation, and extracellular matrix remodeling within the tumor microenvironment. Hypoxia-inducible factor-1α (HIF-1α); vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF); cancer-associated fibroblast (CAF); transforming growth factor-beta (TGF-β); nuclear factor kappa B (NF-κB); phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K); protein kinase B (Akt); mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR).
Figure 2. Schematic representation of natural compounds targeting angiogenesis and tumor microenvironment-related signaling pathways in gastrointestinal malignancies. Through the regulation of these pathways, natural compounds suppress pro-angiogenic signaling, inflammatory responses, fibroblast activation, and extracellular matrix remodeling within the tumor microenvironment. Hypoxia-inducible factor-1α (HIF-1α); vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF); cancer-associated fibroblast (CAF); transforming growth factor-beta (TGF-β); nuclear factor kappa B (NF-κB); phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K); protein kinase B (Akt); mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR).
Cells 15 00623 g002
Figure 3. A schematic view of the interconnection between chronic inflammation and angiogenesis in the TME. Various factors, such as CAFs (cancer-associated fibroblasts), TGF-β (transforming growth factor), PDGF (platelet-derived growth factor), FGF (fibroblast growth factor), IL-6 and IL-1β (interleukin), NF-κB (nuclear factor kappa B), TNF (tissue necrosis factor), and phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K), regulate chronic inflammation and the TME.
Figure 3. A schematic view of the interconnection between chronic inflammation and angiogenesis in the TME. Various factors, such as CAFs (cancer-associated fibroblasts), TGF-β (transforming growth factor), PDGF (platelet-derived growth factor), FGF (fibroblast growth factor), IL-6 and IL-1β (interleukin), NF-κB (nuclear factor kappa B), TNF (tissue necrosis factor), and phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K), regulate chronic inflammation and the TME.
Cells 15 00623 g003
Table 1. Natural compounds, their chemical classes, and their targeting of the TME and angiogenesis.
Table 1. Natural compounds, their chemical classes, and their targeting of the TME and angiogenesis.
CompoundsCompound ClassMajor Molecular Targets/PathwaysAnti-Angiogenic Mechanisms/
Tumor Microenvironment (TME) Effects
Evidence LevelReference
NeotuberostemonineAlkaloid
(stemona alkaloid)
HIF-1α, TGF-β, FGF2
signaling
Suppresses hypoxia-induced HIF-1α activity and downstream pro-angiogenic mediators/
Inhibits fibroblast activation and extracellular matrix remodeling
Preclinical[30]
NaringeninFlavonoidPI3K/Akt/NF-κBSuppresses angiogenesis via inhibition of inflammatory signaling/
Reduces cytokine release and inflammatory signaling in tumor-associated immune cells
Preclinical + human study/Phase I safety and pharmacokinetics study[31,32]
AloperineAlkaloid
(quinolizidine alkaloid)
PI3K/AKT/mTOR, TGF-β/SmadInhibits signaling pathways associated with angiogenic and fibrotic responses/
Suppresses fibroblast proliferation and myofibroblast differentiation
Preclinical[33]
Silymarin/SilibininFlavonolignansJAK2/STAT3, MMP-2 Reduces tumor cell invasion and angiogenesis-associated matrix degradation/
Inhibits ECM remodeling and tumor cell migration
Preclinical + clinical trial [34,35]
Tanshinone IIADiterpenoid
(diterpene quinone)
TNF-α, IL-1β, COX-2, iNOSSuppresses inflammatory mediators that contribute to angiogenesis/
Reduces inflammatory cytokine production in TME
Preclinical[36]
Baccatin IIIDiterpenoid
(taxane-type terpenoid)
TGF-β1/Smad signalingInhibits pro-fibrotic signaling pathways associated with angiogenic microenvironment formation/
Reduces fibroblast activation and collagen deposition
Preclinical[37]
GentiopicrosideIridoid glycoside
(secoiridoid)
TGF-β1, CTGFModulates fibrotic signaling pathways indirectly associated with angiogenesis/
Suppresses epithelial–mesenchymal transition (EMT) and inflammatory responses
Preclinical[38]
AstilbinFlavonoid Hedgehog signalingIndirect suppression of angiogenesis via inhibition of fibrotic signaling/
Reduces EMT and stromal activation in the microenvironment
Preclinical[39]
BerberineAlkaloid
(isoquinoline alkaloid)
PPAR-γ, HGF signalingModulates angiogenesis-associated inflammatory and metabolic signaling/
Alters gut-derived signaling and stromal activation
Preclinical + clinical studies[40,41]
Asiatic acidTriterpenoid TGF-β/Smad, PPAR-γInhibits pro-angiogenic fibrotic signaling/
Reduces inflammatory cytokines and fibroblast activation
Preclinical + phase I study[42,43,44]
AucubinIridoid glycosideTGF-β1, α-SMASuppresses fibroblast-mediated angiogenic stromal activation/
Reduces collagen synthesis and fibroblast proliferation
Preclinical[45]
PhloretinFlavonoid
(chalcone)
NF-κB, MAPK, AktDecreases angiogenesis-related inflammatory signaling/
Suppresses cytokine, COX-2, and ICAM-1 expression
Preclinical[46]
Tectorigenin IsoflavonoidsCOX-2, iNOS, PGE2Inhibits inflammatory mediators involved in angiogenic signaling/
Reduces macrophage-mediated inflammatory responses
Preclinical[47,48]
HSYAFlavonoid
(quinochalcone)
NF-κB, TNF-α, IL-1βSuppresses inflammation-driven angiogenesis/
Reduces inflammatory cytokine production in lung injury models
Preclinical[49,50]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Arslan, I. Natural Products Targeting Angiogenesis and Tumor Microenvironment in Gastrointestinal Malignancies. Cells 2026, 15, 623. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells15070623

AMA Style

Arslan I. Natural Products Targeting Angiogenesis and Tumor Microenvironment in Gastrointestinal Malignancies. Cells. 2026; 15(7):623. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells15070623

Chicago/Turabian Style

Arslan, Idris. 2026. "Natural Products Targeting Angiogenesis and Tumor Microenvironment in Gastrointestinal Malignancies" Cells 15, no. 7: 623. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells15070623

APA Style

Arslan, I. (2026). Natural Products Targeting Angiogenesis and Tumor Microenvironment in Gastrointestinal Malignancies. Cells, 15(7), 623. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells15070623

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop