Next Article in Journal
Efficient Generation of Induced Pluripotent Stem Cell-Derived Definitive Endoderm Cells with Growth Factors and Small Molecules
Previous Article in Journal
Advanced Paternal Age and Sperm Proteome Dynamics: A Possible Explanation for Age-Associated Male Fertility Decline
 
 
Due to scheduled maintenance work on our database systems, there may be short service disruptions on this website between 10:00 and 11:00 CEST on June 14th.
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Bone Marrow Niche Aging: Are Adipocytes Detrimental Cells in the Bone Marrow?

1
Slovenian Institute for Transfusion Medicine, Šlajmerjeva Cesta 6, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia
2
Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Ljubljana, Aškerčeva Cesta 7, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Cells 2025, 14(11), 814; https://doi.org/10.3390/cells14110814
Submission received: 1 May 2025 / Revised: 23 May 2025 / Accepted: 27 May 2025 / Published: 30 May 2025
(This article belongs to the Section Cell Microenvironment)

Abstract

:
Aging disrupts the bone marrow (BM) niche, a complex microenvironment crucial for hematopoietic stem cell (HSC) maintenance. A key, yet debated, hallmark of this aging process is the accumulation of bone marrow adipocytes (BMAds). This review explores the evolving role of BMAds in the aging BM, particularly their influence on HSC regulation via metabolic, endocrine, and inflammatory pathways. Aging BMAds exhibit altered secretory profiles, including reduced leptin and adiponectin and increased pro-inflammatory signals, which skew hematopoiesis toward myeloid over lymphoid lineage production. Additionally, shifts in fatty acid composition and lactate signaling from BMAds may impair stem cell function. These changes, alongside aging-associated alterations in vascular, neural, and stromal components of the niche, contribute to diminished immune resilience in older adults. We discuss emerging therapeutic strategies targeting BMAd-derived factors, such as DPP4 inhibition or the modulation of β-adrenergic signaling, aimed at creating a more youthful BM environment. By summarizing current insights into the aging BM niche and the central role of BMAds, this review highlights mechanisms that could be targeted to rejuvenate hematopoiesis and improve immune function in the elderly.

1. Introduction

The mammalian immune system comprises lymphoid organs, namely the thymus, lymph nodes, and bone marrow (BM), along with various immune cell populations. The aging of the immune system, known as immunosenescence, contributes to increased morbidity in the elderly and is strongly associated with numerous age-related disorders. The progressive decline in immune function results in heightened susceptibility to infections, cancer, and autoimmune diseases, a diminished adaptive immune response following vaccination, and an elevated risk of degenerative conditions [1,2,3,4,5]. The term immunosenescence encompasses not only age-related alterations in immune cells, but also changes in the microenvironments or “niches” within lymphoid and non-lymphoid tissues that support immune cell function and maintain tissue homeostasis [6].
Immune cells originate from the hematopoietic system, which is hierarchically structured with hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) at its apex. In adult humans, approximately 80 × 106 HSCs reside in the BM [7], where they undergo self-renewal and differentiate into hematopoietic progenitors, which then further proliferate and mature into various blood cell lineages through the process of hematopoiesis [8,9]. Out of all HSCs, only 10% are steadily replicating [7] and produce 5 × 1011 hematopoietic cells daily, meaning each active HSC is participating in the daily production of 62,500 mature blood cells [10,11]. This capacity can expand in response to physiological demand [12]. Immune cells constitute approximately one-quarter of all mature blood cells [10], which are continuously replenished throughout an organism’s lifespan [13].
To sustain lifelong hematopoiesis, the self-renewal and differentiation of HSCs must be precisely regulated. Disruptions in these processes can result in HSC depletion or hematological disorders such as leukemia [14,15,16]. HSC fate is governed by intricate interactions between intrinsic and extrinsic regulatory factors [17,18]. Intrinsic factors include transcriptional regulators, epigenetic modifications, and metabolic pathways, which integrate extracellular cues. These extracellular signals are categorized into long-range signals (e.g., endocrine and neural signaling) and local signals derived from the BM microenvironment, collectively referred to as the “HSC niche”.
The concept of a “niche” as a regulatory unit for directing the HSCs’ fate decisions was first suggested by R. Schofield in 1978 [19]. Since then, the niche has been recognized as a complex and dynamic microenvironment in which interactions between HSCs, hematopoietic progenitor cells (HSPCs), and supporting niche cells modulate hematopoiesis. Niche cells influence HSC function through various signaling molecules, including cytokines and chemokines, which may be either secreted or membrane-bound. Additionally, extracellular matrix (ECM) components contribute to the formation of niches with distinct mechanical properties, affecting HSC regulation [20,21]. Moreover, recent evidence also suggests that metabolic products of the niche cells also have a significant impact on HSC regulation [22].
In this review, we will focus on age-related changes in the HSC microenvironment, with a particular emphasis on the role of bone marrow adipocytes (BMAds) and their influence on HSCs. BMAds accumulate progressively within the aging niche, potentially impacting hematopoietic function [23]. We will discuss how BMAds serve as active participants in the aging process, rather than passive fat deposits. By synthesizing current evidence on how aging-associated changes in BMAd characteristics impair HSC regulation, we will underscore their potential as novel therapeutic targets. This is of particular importance in the context of chemotherapy, transplantation, and age-related immune decline in the elderly.
For the sake of clarity, this paper will include nomenclature proposed by the Nomenclature Working Group of the International Bone Marrow Adiposity Society (BMAS) relevant to bone marrow adiposity (BMA) research [24].

2. The Bone Marrow Niche

Mammalian bone marrow (BM) cavities are highly vascularized and innervated, containing a complex network of non-hematopoietic and hematopoietic cells. The non-hematopoietic compartment consists primarily of bone marrow stromal cells (BMSCs) and their progeny, while the hematopoietic compartment includes hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) and their descendants [25,26,27].

2.1. The Cellular Network of the Bone Marrow Niche

The regulation of HSCs involves a complex cellular network (Figure 1). Advances in genetically modified mouse models and microscopy techniques have identified various endogenous BM cell types capable of influencing HSC behavior through the secretion of niche-regulating molecules. These include CXC chemokine ligand 12 (CXCL12), stem cell factor (SCF), thrombopoietin (THPO), osteopontin (OPN), transforming growth factor-β (TGFβ), CXCL4, vascular cell adhesion molecule 1 (VCAM1), GP130, Notch ligands, fibroblast growth factor 1 (FGF1), and pleiotrophin (PTN). Cells that regulate HSCs through both molecular signaling and physical interactions are collectively referred to as “niche cells”. These cells can be categorized into four major components [28]:
  • The vascular component, comprising arteriolar endothelial cells (AECs) and sinusoidal endothelial cells (SECs).
  • The neural component, consisting of sympathetic nerves and non-myelinating Schwann cells.
  • The stromal component, including various perivascular BMSCs, osteoblasts, and adipocytes.
  • The hematopoietic component, encompassing HSCs and their progeny, such as phagocytic cells, megakaryocytes, and regulatory T cells (Tregs).

2.1.1. The Vascular Component

A dense vascular network in BM ensures the delivery of growth factors, neurotransmitters, nutrients, hormones, and oxygen while facilitating the removal of metabolic waste. This vasculature comprises arteries supplying oxygenated blood, veins for blood exit, and an intermediary capillary network. In long bones like the femur, the nutrient artery enters the BM through the diaphysis and branches into central arteries, which further divide into thin-walled arterioles extending towards the metaphysis. These arterioles supply a capillary network composed of fenestrated, highly branched sinusoidal “type L” vessels. The transition from arterioles to sinusoids primarily occurs in the metaphysis and, to a lesser extent, in the diaphysis, mediated by “type H” vessels. Sinusoidal vessels converge into the central sinusoid, which spans the BM and drains into the nutrient vein, directing blood into systemic circulation [25,28].
Endothelial cells within the BM serve a critical role in HSC maintenance. In vivo studies demonstrate that the deletion of endothelial cell-specific genes, such as Jag1 [29], Cxcl12 [30,31], Gp130 [32], or Scf [33] can disrupt HSC homeostasis. AECs and SECs, distinguished by their expression of SCA1 and podoplanin (PDPN), also show functional differences. AECs (CD45-Ter119-SCA1highPDPN−) produce nearly all endothelial cell-derived SCF, and its deletion significantly reduces functional HSCs, whereas SCF deletion in SECs (CD45-Ter119-SCA1dimPDPN+) does not yield comparable effects [34]. However, whether these results stem solely from SCF deletion in AECs or involve broader niche modifications remains unclear. Given the close association between endothelial cells and perivascular BMSCs, it is plausible that niche interdependencies contribute to these findings. Notably, SCF and CXCL12 levels in BM endothelial cells are considerably lower than in BMSCs [35,36].
Additionally, differences in vessel architecture impact HSC function. Although HSCs exhibit a hypoxic profile regardless of BM localization [37], recent studies indicate that vessel permeability influences local reactive oxygen species (ROS) levels, affecting HSC fate. AECs, which form less permeable vessels, associate with quiescent HSCs characterized by lower ROS levels, whereas SECs form more permeable vessels linked to higher ROS levels, promoting HSC activation and differentiation [38].

2.1.2. The Neural Component

The skeleton is innervated by both branches of the autonomic nervous system: the sympathetic and parasympathetic nerve fibers [39,40,41]. Between the two, only sympathetic nerve fibers enter the BM [39,41]. It was shown that only 5% of all sympathetic nerve fibers reaching bone penetrate the BM [42]. Despite this, the BM has a higher density of autonomic nerves relative to the periosteum or mineralized bone [41]. Arterioles, located mainly near the endosteal regions of the BM, are cloaked by the sympathetic nerves that are covered by the non-myelinating Schwann cells. Both sympathetic nerves and non-myelinating Schwann cells have been labeled as niche cells due to their ability to regulate HSCs migration and quiescence either directly or indirectly through the production of the neurotransmitter noradrenaline and TGFβ [26].
Noradrenaline, released from sympathetic fibers, plays a crucial role in HSC mobilization by signaling through adrenergic receptors. Namely, the movement of HSCs from the BM into circulation depends on an intact gradient of CXCL12, which is disrupted by granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF), leading to HSC mobilization [43,44]. The G-CSF-induced HSC mobilization was shown to be suppressed by the genetic or pharmacologic ablation of adrenergic neurotransmission, indicating that noradrenaline controls G-CSF-induced CXCL12 downregulation [45]. Interestingly, the G-CSF-induced migration of HSCs is linked to suppression of BMSC and osteolineage cell function [45,46,47,48,49]. Additionally, perivascular stromal cells, studied as Nes-GFP+ BMSCs, are directly targeted by sympathetic nerves. These cells respond to adrenergic signals via β3-adrenergic receptors, which regulate CXCL12 expression in a circadian manner and influence HSC egress in mice [46,50] and possibly in humans [51]. Human HSCs also express β2-adrenergic receptors, allowing for direct adrenergic regulation that promotes their migration and engraftment [52].
Non-myelinating Schwann cells, identified by glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) expression, also contribute to HSC quiescence by activating the TGFβ/Smad signaling pathway in dormant HSCs. Surgical denervation via the transection of the postganglionic sympathetic nerve results in HSC depletion due to increased proliferation [53]. However, other denervation methods, such as acute surgical or chemical sympathectomy, do not significantly affect HSC numbers [46], which leaves questions open about how sympathetic signaling influences Schwann cells and whether other post-surgical effects, such as inflammation, could play a role.
Beyond sympathetic nerves, sensory fibers also penetrate the BM, though their role in hematopoiesis remains largely unknown [41,54,55,56,57]. Similarly, parasympathetic fibers have been observed in the distal femoral metaphysis [40,58], but their function in HSC regulation is unclear. However, evidence suggests that acetylcholine signaling through the type 1 muscarinic receptor (CHRM1) in the hypothalamus may regulate G-CSF-induced HSC mobilization. This process is mediated by the activation of the hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal (HPA) axis, leading to glucocorticoid production, which in turn primes HSCs for migration [59].

2.1.3. The Stromal Component

Bone marrow stromal cells (BMSCs) are a rare, self-renewing, and multipotent cell population that play a crucial role in maintaining the hematopoietic niche. These cells tightly surround arterioles while loosely associating with sinusoidal blood vessels. In vitro, they form colony-forming unit-fibroblasts (CFU-Fs) or non-adherent mesenspheres and can generate an organized hematopoietic niche with active hematopoiesis upon transplantation [60]. Their niche-organizing potential has been demonstrated through various transplantation experiments. For example, fetal mouse CD105+CD51+ BM stromal cells transplanted into the renal capsule of adult mice successfully induced ectopic hematopoietic marrow [61]. Similarly, human CD146+ BM stromal cells transplanted subcutaneously in mice formed heterotopic hematopoietic niches [62].
Sympathetic nervous system signaling plays a key role in HSC mobilization from the BM, primarily by regulating CXCL12 synthesis [45,46,51]. Within the stromal compartment, a subset of BMSCs, identified as perivascular cells by using green fluorescent protein (GFP) under the nestin promoter (Nes-GFP+ cells), was found to closely interact with nerves. These cells express high levels of niche factors essential for HSC maintenance and attraction, including CXCL12, SCF, ANGPT1, OPN, IL-7, and VCAM1 [50]. Similar populations have been identified in non-transgenic mice and human fetal BM using platelet-derived growth factor receptor-α (PDGFRα) and CD51 as markers [63]. Notably, Nestin+ BMSCs have been identified as essential constituents of the HSC niche, closely associated with HSCs and contributing to their maintenance and quiescence [50].
Another key BMSC subset, identified using a GFP knock-in at the Cxcl12 locus, consists of CXCL12-abundant reticular (CAR) cells, which are mainly adipo-osteogenic progenitor cells located around sinusoids. CAR cells are primary producers of SCF and IL-7, critical for lymphoid progenitor and mature B cell maintenance [64,65,66]. Studies using a GFP knock-in at the Scf locus further identified perivascular cells marked by the adipo-osteogenic regulator LepR [33,67]. Around 90% of LepR+ BMSCs overlap with CAR BMSCs, and they also constitute about 80% of Nes-GFP+ cells [68,69,70].
Advanced 3D imaging and flow cytometry have identified two distinct subsets of Nes-GFP+ cells based on GFP expression and morphology. Nes-GFPbright cells, which are spindle-shaped NG2+ cells localized along arterioles, promote HSC quiescence, while Nes-GFPdim cells, with a reticular morphology, reside near sinusoids and overlap with LepR+ and CAR BMSCs [69]. The NG2+ BMSCs also express smooth-muscle marker MYH11 [36]. Depleting NG2+ BMSCs alters HSC localization, shifting them away from arterioles and leading to increased cycling, depletion from the BM, and reduced numbers in the spleen [69]. The selective deletion of Cxcl12 in NG2+ periarteriolar cells—but not in sinusoidal LepR+ cells—also leads to HSC depletion and mislocalization [36]. Similarly, CAR BMSC depletion results in reduced HSC numbers, indicating their critical role in HSC retention [65]. The conditional deletion of Cxcl12 in LepR+ BMSCs mobilizes HSCs to the circulation and spleen, but does not affect their numbers in the BM [33,36,71]. These findings suggest that distinct perivascular BMSC subsets regulate HSC maintenance through different cytokines (e.g., CAR or LepR+ cells versus NG2+ cells).
Earlier studies suggested that osteolineage cells play a role in HSC regulation [72,73,74], leading to the hypothesis that osteoblasts serve as a primary HSC niche [75,76,77,78]. However, more recent studies refute this, demonstrating that deleting Cxcl12 or Scf in osteoblasts and osteoprogenitors has minimal impact on HSC numbers [30,31,33]. Although osteoblasts do not appear to be direct niche cells, they produce regulatory factors such as osteopontin (OPN), which negatively regulates HSC pool size [79,80], and angiopoietin 1 (ANGPT1) [81] and thrombopoietin (THPO) [82,83], which maintain HSC quiescence. However, hepatocytes, rather than osteoblasts, are now considered the primary source of functional THPO for HSC maintenance, while ANGPT1 is predominantly secreted by megakaryocytes, LepR+ BMSCs, and hematopoietic progenitors [35,84]. Additionally, studies show that quiescent HSCs are not preferentially located near osteoblasts [37,69]. Although osteolineage cells may not serve as primary HSC niche cells, they appear to support lymphoid progenitors [30,31,78,85,86]. In this context, osteoblast deficiency has been shown to severely impair hematopoiesis, underscoring the supportive role of osteoblasts in the HSC niche [87].
In contrast, adipolineage cells have emerged as functional niche cells. Bone marrow regions with high adipocyte content, such as mouse tail vertebrae, contain fewer HSCs compared to adipocyte-scarce regions like thoracic vertebrae. Studies in A-ZIP/F1 ‘fatless’ mice show improved HSC engraftment, suggesting that adipocytes negatively affect HSC function [88]. Blocking adipogenesis using peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ (PPARγ) antagonists enhances BM recovery after chemotherapy or transplantation [88,89]. Conversely, intratibial co-transplantation of adipogenic precursors with HSCs impairs engraftment and bone fracture healing, possibly due to excessive dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) production [90].
BM adipocytes also contribute to hematopoietic regeneration through SCF expression. In non-irradiated mice, SCF deletion from adipocytes reduces HSC frequency in tail vertebrae, which contain a high adipocyte density, but has little effect in long bones, where adipocytes are less abundant. Interestingly, A-ZIP/F1 ‘fatless’ mice show delayed hematopoietic recovery in long bones but not in tail vertebrae [91]. These findings suggest that BM adipocytes influence HSC maintenance and niche function, particularly in response to stress conditions such as irradiation or chemotherapy.

2.1.4. The Hematopoietic Component

In addition to the vascular, neural, and stromal constituents of the hematopoietic stem cell (HSC) niche, HSC descendants themselves also play a role in regulating HSC function. Among the key hematopoietic regulators are megakaryocytes (Mk), phagocytic cells, and regulatory T (Treg) cells [28].
Megakaryocytes have been shown to directly regulate HSC quiescence [92,93,94,95]. Three-dimensional whole-mount imaging has revealed that HSCs are frequently localized near megakaryocytes, and selective depletion of Mk in vivo leads to HSC activation and proliferation [92]. A subpopulation of HSCs predisposed to megakaryocyte differentiation expresses platelet markers such as von Willebrand factor (vWF) and CD41 [96,97]. These vWF-GFP+ HSCs are preferentially positioned near Mk, and their depletion results in selective expansion, loss of lineage bias, and impaired long-term self-renewal following transplantation [98].
Megakaryocytes balance HSC quiescence through the secretion of the chemokine CXCL4 [92], TGF-β1 [93,99] and THPO [94,95]. In addition, CXCL4 and TGF-β1 secreted by Mk may restrict the formation of granulocyte/macrophage progenitor (GMP) clusters, an essential feature of emergency myelopoiesis, by enforcing HSC quiescence and thereby limiting the duration of the myelopoietic response [100].
Phagocytic cells, particularly BM macrophages, also influence HSC behavior. Macrophages regulate osteolineage cells and BMSCs to promote HSC retention while counteracting HSC egress induced by the autonomic nervous system [49,101,102]. In vivo depletion of macrophages resulted in HSC mobilization into the blood [102]. Moreover, in vivo and in vitro data suggest that BM CD169+ macrophages induce the expression of CXCL12 and other retention factors in Nes–GFP+ BMSCs to promote HSC retention [101], along with in vitro data showing that macrophages support osteoblast growth [49]. Meanwhile, BM monocytes contribute to HSC mobilization through granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF)-receptor signaling [49].
Neutrophils influence HSC retention through their daily release and clearance in a circadian manner. Macrophages mediate this effect by clearing neutrophils via liver X receptor signaling [103]. Neutrophils also promote hematopoietic recovery after irradiation by producing TNF-α, which enhances vascular repair via TNF receptors [104]. This highlights both direct and indirect mechanisms by which phagocytic cells influence HSC behavior.
Recent findings suggest that BM dendritic cells (BMDCs) are an essential component of the perivascular hematopoietic niche. Most BMDCs exhibit a type 2 conventional dendritic cell (cDC2) phenotype, but RNA expression analysis suggests that they differ from splenic cDC2s, displaying unique expression patterns of chemokine receptors and toll-like receptors. BMDC depletion leads to the loss of BM macrophages and increased HSC mobilization, surpassing the effects of macrophage depletion alone. This suggests that BMDCs influence HSC mobilization through both macrophage-dependent and independent mechanisms. BMDC depletion also leads to endothelial expansion and increased vascular permeability, primarily due to CXCR2 upregulation in sinusoidal endothelial cells. In CXCR2-deficient mice, HSC mobilization following BMDC depletion is significantly reduced, confirming the role of BMDCs in sinusoidal permeability and HSC trafficking [105].
Regulatory T (Treg) cells also play a role in HSC regulation, as demonstrated in studies on allogeneic HSC (allo-HSC) transplantation. These studies suggest that Tregs promote HSC engraftment, survival, and quiescence [106,107,108,109]. Initial findings showed that certain T cell subsets improve HSC engraftment in allogeneic transplantation settings. Further studies revealed that allo-HSCs colocalize with FoxP3+ Tregs, which promote HSC survival by secreting the anti-inflammatory cytokine IL-10 [108]. Additionally, HSCs are closely associated with a subset of CD150high FoxP3+ Tregs, which express high levels of suppressive and costimulatory molecules compared to their CD150low counterparts. CD150high BM Tregs promote HSC quiescence by producing adenosine, catalyzed by CD39, a molecule highly expressed in this subset [109].

3. Aging of BM Niches

Aging leads to significant changes in the immune system, beginning with the decline of hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) [110]. In mice, aging increases the number of phenotypically defined HSCs in the bone marrow (BM) but reduces their regenerative potential [111,112,113,114]. However, not all mouse strains exhibit an elevated quantity of HSCs. For instance, the amount of functional HSCs in BALB/c mice decreases with age [115]. Additionally, endogenous old HSCs are distributed away from their accepted niches [116], and have increased mobilization and diminished homing capacity into the BM [114,117,118,119,120]. When transplanted into young recipients, aged HSCs home further away from the endosteum compared to young HSCs [117]. Functionally, they exhibit a myeloid-biased differentiation pattern, producing fewer lymphoid cells while maintaining or even increasing myeloid lineage output [113,117,121]. While intrinsic, cell-autonomous mechanisms contribute to HSC aging [122], growing evidence suggests that changes in the BM niche also drive these age-related alterations [110].

3.1. Aging of the Hematopoietic Component

Aging affects the hematopoietic niche by altering its cellular composition. In aged mice, the BM contains increased numbers of megakaryocyte progenitors (MkP), megakaryocytes (Mk), platelets, and inflammatory M1-like macrophages (Mφ), which exhibit impaired phagocytic and efferocytic function—the ability to clear apoptotic cells [116,123]. The removal of apoptotic cells is an essential function of Mφs that avoids the necrosis of dead cells and prevents consequent local inflammation [124,125]. Moreover, engulfing apoptotic cells triggers the secretion of anti-inflammatory mediators in phagocytes [126]. This loss of efferocytic capacity leads to the accumulation of senescent neutrophils that produce IL-1β, a pro-inflammatory cytokine [123]. Chronic IL-1β exposure promotes the expansion of myeloid-biased CD41+ long-term HSCs (LT-HSCs) while enhancing myelopoiesis and suppressing lymphopoiesis [127].

3.2. Aging of the Vascular Component

Structural and functional changes occur in the BM vasculature with age. Although overall vascular density increases, the number of type-H capillaries and the length and number of arterioles decline [116,128]. Aged endothelial cells (ECs) exhibit higher permeability, increased reactive oxygen species (ROS) levels, greater hypoxia, and reduced expression of Jagged 1, CXCL12, and SCF. These changes impair niche function, as young HSCs co-cultured with aged ECs acquire a myeloid-biased differentiation profile and reduced engraftment potential. Conversely, aged HSCs co-cultured with young ECs partially regain function, demonstrating improved hematopoietic reconstitution, though they retain their myeloid bias [129]. These findings suggest that the aging of the vascular niche contributes to HSC dysfunction.

3.3. Aging of the Neural Component

Since arterioles and sympathetic nerves are closely linked, aging leads to a decline in arteriolar innervation. This is evidenced by a reduction in tyrosine hydroxylase-positive (TH+) adrenergic nerve fibers, β-III tubulin+ nerve fibers, and synaptic contacts between nerves and blood vessels [116]. The loss of sympathetic innervation disrupts circadian HSC egress, a feature preserved in young mice. Surgical BM denervation in young mice induces age-like microenvironmental changes, including shortened arteriolar vessels, increased CD31high ECs, and expanded CD51+ PDGFRα+ BMSCs with diminished clonogenic potential. These denervated BMSCs exhibit downregulated Cxcl12, Scf, and Angpt1 expression, impaired osteogenic differentiation, and sustained adipogenic potential. The resulting HSC dysfunction includes impaired polarity, reduced engraftment, myeloid-biased differentiation, expanded HSC pools, and increased DNA damage (γH2AX foci) [116].
Sympathetic signaling via β2-adrenergic receptors (ADRβ2) and β3-adrenergic receptors (ADRβ3) plays a role in these aging-related changes [46,130,131]. While ADRβ3 expression remains stable in stromal cells with age, ADRβ2 is broadly expressed in both hematopoietic and non-hematopoietic compartments and declines over time [36,116,132]. The pharmacological activation of ADRβ2 or ADRβ3 in aged mice restores BMSC and EC numbers to youthful levels, but only ADRβ3 activation leads to functional HSC rejuvenation. ADRβ3 agonist treatment enhances long-term engraftment, multilineage reconstitution, and secondary transplantation success. Transcriptomic analysis confirms that ADRβ3 activation shifts aged HSC gene expression toward a youthful state. Additionally, it restores vascular and stromal structure, increasing the arteriolar density and clonogenic activity of CD51+ PDGFRα+ BMSCs while upregulating Cxcl12 and Scf expression. Notably, young Adrb3−/− mice exhibit premature HSC aging, suggesting that neural dysfunction is a key driver of BM niche deterioration [116].

3.4. Aging of the Stromal Component

Aging alters perivascular BMSC populations, leading to an expansion of Nes-GFPbright perivascular BMSCs, which express NG2, a pericyte marker [69,116]. In contrast, the Nes-GFPdim sinusoidal BMSC population remains unchanged. Aged CD51+ PDGFRα+ stromal cells exhibit increased proliferation but reduced clonogenic potential, impaired osteogenesis, and increased adipogenic differentiation. These aged BMSCs also display lower expressions of key niche factors (CXCL12, SCF, and ANGPT1) [116]. Treatment with an ADRβ3 agonist partially restores stromal function, enhancing BMSC clonogenicity and niche factor expression, which in turn improves HSC function [116].
Osteolineage cells also undergo niche-related aging. Increased CCL5 expression in aged osteoblasts may contribute to HSC differentiation bias [133], while decreased osteopontin (OPN) expression is linked to impaired HSC function [134]. Treatment with thrombin-cleaved OPN reverses these defects, improving engraftment, restoring HSC polarity, and balancing lymphoid and myeloid differentiation [134].

4. Bone Marrow Adipocytes

Regarding the effect of aging on adipocytes within the BM, this subject is still underexplored. Although the content of adipocytes in the BM increases with aging, their role in hematopoiesis remains a controversial topic [135,136] (Figure 2).

4.1. The Bone Marrow Adipose Tissue Ontogeny

In humans, bone marrow adipose tissue (BMAT) expands significantly after birth in a centripetal pattern. At birth, the BM consists primarily of hematopoietic cells and is referred to as red marrow due to its high erythrocyte content. As development progresses, adipocytes accumulate first in the distal skeleton (hands and feet), followed by the epiphyses of long bones, and later in the diaphysis—with distal regions accumulating fat more rapidly than proximal ones [137]. By the age of 25, 50–70% of BM volume is occupied by BMAT [138], contributing to the progressive shift from red to yellow marrow, which continues throughout the lifespan [139,140]. In the axial skeleton, adipocyte accumulation occurs later but is evident in the sternum, ribs, pelvis, and vertebrae by adulthood [141]. Within the spine, adiposity follows a gradient from the sacrum to the lumbar vertebrae, with spinal fat content increasing from 27% to 76% between the ages of 10 and 76 [142,143].
In rodents, BMAds also expand in a centripetal pattern. Early studies suggested that BM contains distinct adipocyte subtypes, differing in lipid composition and responses to metabolic changes [144]. This was later confirmed by Scheller et al. (2015), who classified BMAT into two distinct subtypes based on location and regulatory mechanisms: constitutive BMAT (cBMAT) and regulated BMAT (rBMAT) [145,146]. cBMAT develops early in life, localizing in distal tibia and caudal vertebrae. It consists of large, densely packed adipocytes enriched in unsaturated fatty acids and remains relatively stable despite metabolic or physiological changes. rBMAT forms later in proximal tibia, femur, and lumbar vertebrae, containing smaller, dispersed adipocytes with a higher content of saturated fatty acids (e.g., palmitate and stearate). This subtype is highly responsive to environmental factors [135].
A reduction in rBMAds was observed after prolonged cold exposure (4 °C) that lasted for three weeks [146], acute fasting [147], prolonged voluntary running [148], during lactation [149], and following intracerebral or subcutaneous leptin injection [150,151]. On the other hand, rBMAds boosters include a high-fat diet [148,152], caloric restriction (CR) [153,154,155], treatments with thiazolidinediones and glucocorticoids [156,157], fibroblast growth factor 21 (FGF21) [158], insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (type I diabetes) [159], irradiation [91], and aging [90,160].
Both BMAT types are susceptible to extreme conditions, leading to gelatinous transformation of the BM (GTBM)—a rare hematologic condition associated with anorexia, systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), malignancies, and HIV [161]. Additionally, hemorrhage leads to a decrease in both cBMAT and rBMAT [162].

4.2. Expression and Secretion of Bioactive Substances by BMAds

Adipocytes function as lipid storage cells and endocrine regulators, secreting adipokines, cytokines, chemokines, hormones, and metabolic byproducts (e.g., fatty acids and lactate), which influence inflammation and hematopoiesis [163,164,165]. While inflammation plays a role in tissue homeostasis, chronic inflammation disrupts tissue integrity, particularly with aging, where BMAT expansion contributes to immune dysregulation [166,167,168,169,170,171].
BMAds develop from BMSCs, and their differentiation hierarchy has been extensively reviewed elsewhere [136]. The in vitro differentiation of BMAds leads to an increased secretion of adipokines, including leptin, adiponectin, IL-6, MCP-1, RANKL, dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP4), and resistin [90,172,173,174,175,176,177]. On the other hand, CXCL12 expression decreases significantly during adipocyte differentiation, while CXCL2 levels remain unchanged [178].
Aged BMAds exhibit altered cytokine and adipokine profiles. They show reduced leptin, adiponectin, and IL-6 expression, while TNF-α and IL-1β increase in middle-aged BMAds but decline in older BMAds [179]. Proteomic studies reveal age-related reductions in TNFα, IL-6, RANKL, CXCL2, and MCP-1, suggesting altered immune interactions [180].

4.3. Metabolic Products of BMAds and Their Impact on HSC Regulation

4.3.1. Fatty Acids

BMAds regulate energy homeostasis through the storage and release of fatty acids. Triglycerides are stored under insulin regulation, while energy demand triggers lipolysis, leading to the breakdown of triglycerides into free fatty acids (FFAs) and glycerol [181,182]. In adipocytes, lipolysis is controlled by a complex system of lipases and lipid-binding proteins [183].
Among these, perilipins play a crucial role in adipocyte lipid metabolism by regulating access to triglyceride stores [184,185,186]. Perilipin 1 (PLIN1) modulates the activity of key lipases, such as adipose triglyceride lipase (ATGL) and hormone-sensitive lipase (HSL), under both basal and stimulated conditions [187]. Lipolysis can also occur at a basal level in the absence of external stimuli [188]. Elevated basal lipolysis has been observed in perilipin-null mice [189] and in patients with loss-of-function mutations in perilipin 1 [190]. Gene expression profiling of BMAds revealed that aged BMAds exhibit reduced PLIN1 expression, suggesting that increased basal lipolysis may lead to excessive exposure of the BM microenvironment to saturated fatty acids [179].
Fatty acid oxidation (FAO) has been proposed as a key metabolic process for HSC self-renewal and protection against exhaustion [191]. However, the role of different FA types in hematopoiesis appears to be more complex.
Higher monounsaturated fatty acid (MUFA) levels in BM extracellular fluid correlate with an increased proportion of long-term HSCs (LT-HSCs) and granulocyte-macrophage progenitors (GMPs), while common myeloid progenitors (CMPs) and megakaryocyte-erythrocyte progenitors (MEPs) remain unchanged. However, common lymphoid progenitors (CLPs) are reduced in this setting. Increased saturated fatty acid (SFA) content in BM extracellular fluid leads to a reduced number of LT-HSCs, while increasing the proportion of CLPs. Despite this early advantage for lymphopoiesis, peripheral B lymphocyte numbers remain unchanged. Additionally, higher SFA levels in BM extracellular fluid correlate with an increased rate of B and T lymphocyte apoptosis, leading to a net reduction in these immune cells in the BM [192].
These findings suggest that a higher MUFA-to-SFA ratio in BM extracellular fluid supports HSC maintenance and hematopoiesis, while elevated SFA levels negatively impact HSC self-renewal and immune cell survival.

4.3.2. Lactate

Lactate is a key metabolic byproduct produced by adipocytes and other cell types. It acts as a signaling molecule by binding to G-protein-coupled receptor 81 (GPR81), which is also expressed on hematopoietic stem cells [165,193,194,195,196,197]. Despite its known systemic role, the contribution of bone marrow adipocytes (BMAds) to lactate production remains unclear. No direct studies have specifically examined lactate secretion from BMAds or the expression of glycolytic enzymes involved in glucose metabolism within these cells [198].
Unlike other adipose tissues, bone marrow adipose tissue (BMAT) does not respond to physiological insulin levels in terms of glucose uptake [199]. Additionally, recent findings suggest that adipocyte lactate production remains active even in insulin-resistant states, indicating a continuous metabolic output [164].
The role of lactate in hematopoiesis has been explored using Gpr81−/− mice, which lack lactate signaling. These mice showed a significant reduction in long-term HSCs (LT-HSCs), short-term HSCs (ST-HSCs), multipotent progenitors (MPPs), common myeloid progenitors (CMPs), and megakaryocyte-erythrocyte progenitors (MEPs) compared to wild-type controls. However, granulocyte-macrophage progenitors (GMPs) remained unchanged, and the knockout mice exhibited poor hematopoietic recovery following irradiation damage. Conversely, increasing serum lactate levels promoted myeloid progenitor expansion, suggesting that lactate plays a role in HSC proliferation and myeloid lineage differentiation [195]. These findings suggest that lactate plays a critical role in regulating HSC proliferation and differentiation, particularly favoring the myeloid lineage. Further research is required to fully understand how BMAds contribute to lactate metabolism and its impact on hematopoiesis.

4.4. The Impact of Adipokines Secreted Form BMAds on HSC Regulation and Hematopoiesis

Adipokines play a crucial role in hematopoiesis, with several secreted factors from bone marrow adipocytes (BMAds) influencing hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells (HSPCs). One key adipokine, adiponectin, which declines with age in BMAds, has been shown to stimulate HSPCs by binding to its receptors, activating the p38 MAPK pathway, and promoting proliferation while maintaining an immature state. This effect improves long-term hematopoietic reconstitution following transplantation into lethally irradiated mice [200]. Adiponectin-deficient mice exhibit reduced HSPC proliferation, prolonged bone marrow hypocellularity, and lower neutrophil and platelet counts following myelosuppressive injury, although steady-state hematopoiesis remains largely normal, apart from slightly elevated platelet levels [201,202].
Another critical adipokine, leptin, also declines with age and is involved in HSC regulation by binding to the leptin receptor [203]. In vitro, leptin stimulates myelopoiesis in both human and murine hematopoietic progenitor cells [204,205]. In vivo, leptin-deficient (ob/ob) mice exhibit increased circulating monocytes, reduced circulating lymphocytes, and impaired lymphopoiesis recovery following sub-lethal γ-irradiation [206,207]. Leptin receptor-deficient (db/db) mice show BM hypocellularity, impaired hematopoiesis, reduced lymphoid differentiation, and an age-related shift toward myeloid-biased differentiation [208,209].
Beyond these classical adipokines, BMAds secrete inflammatory cytokines, including IL-6, TNF-α, and IL-1β, which directly influence hematopoiesis. TNF-α and IL-1β, elevated in middle-aged BMAds but declining in aged BMAds, promote HSC proliferation and myeloid differentiation [210]. IL-6, which decreases with aging, is a crucial mediator of myeloid lineage development [211]. The chemokine C–C motif chemokine ligand 2 (CCL2/MCP-1), which declines with age, signals through C–C chemokine receptor type 2 (CCR2), affecting HSPCs and early myeloid progenitors [212]. While wild-type and CCR2-deficient BM cells exhibit similar abilities to form clonogenic myeloid progenitors in vitro, the addition of exogenous CCL2 does not enhance colony formation [213]. Some studies suggest that MCP-1 suppresses myeloid progenitor proliferation, as exogenous MCP-1 inhibits proliferation in murine and human BM myeloid progenitors [214,215]. In CCR2-deficient mice, myeloid progenitors exhibit an increased proliferative capacity, suggesting that MCP-1 may act as a negative regulator of myeloid expansion [216]. To date, no studies have specifically examined MCP-1 knockout models or MCP-1 blockade in HSC regulation.
Another chemokine, CXCL2 (macrophage inflammatory protein-2, MIP-2), which is secreted at lower levels in aged BMAds, binds to CXCR2, influencing HSC mobilization [217,218]. In vitro, CXCL2 suppresses the colony formation of myeloid progenitors in murine and human BM cells in a dose-dependent manner [215,219]. In vivo, Cxcr2−/− mice exhibit increased BM and spleen cellularity, along with elevated HSC and hematopoietic progenitor cell (HPC) numbers. These mice show impaired LT-HSC self-renewal, loss of quiescence, and reduced serial transplantation potential, while their myeloid differentiation is altered, leading to an expansion of granulocytes and granulocyte-macrophage progenitors (GMPs) [219,220]. Interestingly, lymphopoiesis is not significantly affected, as B and T cell numbers remain stable in the BM, spleen, and thymus [219]. CXCR2 also interacts with ligands other than CXCL2, making its precise role in HSC regulation complex [218,221].
RANKL, a TNF superfamily member, is another key regulator secreted at reduced levels by aged BMAds. It binds to RANK and competes with osteoprotegerin (OPG), which acts as its soluble decoy receptor, inhibiting RANKL signaling [222]. In RANKL-deficient mice, HSPC mobilization is increased, whereas OPG-deficient mice show reduced HSPC mobilization, indicating that RANKL plays a role in HSC retention [223]. Additionally, RANK−/− and RANKL−/− mice exhibit reduced splenic B lymphocytes, normal T cell populations, and active extramedullary hematopoiesis, highlighting its importance in lymphocyte development and function [224,225].
Another significant enzyme, dipeptidyl peptidase 4 (DPP4/CD26), expressed in BMAds, cleaves hematopoietic growth factors, altering HSC regulation [226]. Aged constitutive BMAds (cBMAds) express higher DPP4 levels, while regulated BMAds (rBMAds) show increased DPP4 secretion upon differentiation [90]. DPP4 enzymatic activity cleaves key hematopoietic regulators, including SDF-1 (CXCL12), G-CSF, IL-3, GM-CSF, and erythropoietin (EPO), impairing HSC retention and promoting myeloid-biased differentiation. Increased DPP4 activity correlates with HSC exhaustion, while the inhibition of DPP4 restores lymphoid differentiation, particularly in aged or stress-induced hematopoiesis models. The biological inhibitor of DPP4, tissue factor pathway inhibitor (TFPI), exerts its function through glypican-3 (GPC3), which is expressed on murine and human HSPCs. Gpc3 knockout mice, which exhibit elevated DPP4 activity, display increased HSPC proliferation, reduced quiescence, and a smaller BM HSC pool, suggesting that DPP4-mediated cleavage promotes HSC exhaustion and mobilization [227]. Additionally, these knockout mice exhibit defects in monocytic/macrophage lineage development, aligning with the hematopoietic growth factors targeted by DPP4, which are essential for myeloid lineage differentiation [226,228].
These findings suggest that DPP4 activity in BMAds contributes to HSC aging by promoting stem cell mobilization, reducing quiescence, and shifting hematopoiesis toward a myeloid-dominant state, making DPP4 inhibition a potential therapeutic strategy to counteract age-related hematopoietic dysfunction.
Resistin, a small polypeptide hormone secreted by BMAds, has been largely overlooked in HSC regulation and hematopoiesis [229]. Recent studies suggest that resistin modulates BM progenitor cell proliferation, as recombinant mouse resistin enhances colony-forming unit (CFU) activity in a dose-dependent manner. In vivo, daily resistin injections increase total BM cellularity and promote cell cycle entry, as shown by a higher proportion of BM cells in S phase after five consecutive days of treatment. However, after ten consecutive days, this effect diminishes, and BM cellularity returns to baseline [122].
These findings indicate that resistin transiently drives BM progenitor cells out of quiescence into a proliferative state, but a homeostatic mechanism likely restores quiescence to prevent HSC exhaustion. The specific signaling pathways through which resistin affects HSCs remain poorly understood, and no further studies have explored its long-term impact on HSC maintenance, differentiation, or aging.
Altogether, the altered secretory profile of adipokines, cytokines, and chemokines in aged BMAds appears to contribute directly to HSC aging and their impaired ability to support immune function. These findings suggest that targeting age-related changes in BMAd signaling may provide new therapeutic avenues for restoring healthy hematopoiesis and immune system function in aging individuals.
While the overall number of adipocytes increases with age in the bone marrow, this quantitative expansion is accompanied by qualitative phenotypic changes that are equally critical to niche dysfunction [115]. Aging BMAds not only accumulate in number, but also exhibit hallmarks of cellular senescence, including the upregulation of senescence-associated β-galactosidase and a shift toward a pro-inflammatory secretory phenotype known as the senescence-associated secretory phenotype (SASP) [128]. This includes elevated levels of IL-6, TNF-α, and other cytokines that promote chronic inflammation, disrupt HSC quiescence, and bias hematopoiesis toward the myeloid lineage. Thus, it is not merely the increased adipocyte volume, but their senescence-driven secretory alterations that may actively impair hematopoietic regulation and accelerate immune aging.

4.5. A Potential Impact of BMAds on the HSC Niche Components

Aged BM carries an increased population of pro-inflammatory M1-like macrophages (Mφ), which show marked impairment in their phagocytic and efferocytic capacities [230]. Concurrently, vascular density in aged BM is elevated, but the vasculature becomes increasingly leaky and is composed of endothelial cells (ECs) with heightened reactive oxygen species (ROS) levels [231,232]. These vascular changes may, in part, be driven by M1-like Mφ, which produces elevated levels of IL-1β, a pro-inflammatory cytokine known to exert both pro-angiogenic effects and to increase vascular permeability [230,233].
In addition to their effect on immune cells, factors secreted by aged BM adipocytes (BMAds), including resistin, DPP4, FAs, and lactate, may further exacerbate vascular dysfunction. These molecules have been shown to promote vascular permeability [234,235,236,237,238]. Moreover, resistin and saturated FAs enhance ROS production [234,235,239,240]. Conversely, DPP4 inhibitors have been shown to exert vasculoprotective effects by reducing inflammation and oxidative stress, improving EC function, attenuating senescence and apoptosis, and increasing levels of circulating endothelial progenitor cells [241].
An open question still remains, namely, what drives the polarization of Mφ toward an M1-like phenotype with impaired efferocytosis in the aged BM? Evidence suggests that aged BMAds may play a role in this process. Classically activated M1 Mφ are characterized by low efferocytic capacity, while alternatively activated M2 Mφ are proficient in clearing apoptotic cells [242]. Several adipokines whose secretion declines in aged BMAds, including leptin, adiponectin, IL-6, MCP-1, and CXCL2, have been implicated in promoting M2 polarization and enhancing efferocytosis [243,244,245,246,247]. RANKL, also reduced in aged BMAds, has been shown to exert anti-inflammatory effects on macrophages in the presence of adipocyte-derived factors [248].
In contrast, increased DPP4 expression, as well as saturated FAs, have been shown to favor M1 macrophage polarization [247,249,250]. Although data on resistin remain limited, in vitro studies using human and murine monocytic/macrophage cell lines suggest that resistin may contribute to M1 polarization as well [249,251]. However, in vivo confirmation of these effects is currently lacking.

5. Conclusions

Aging profoundly affects the bone marrow niche. It alters its cellular and molecular composition in ways that compromise HSC function. One of the most significant changes is the expansion of BMAds, which not only replace the hematopoietic space but also actively contribute to inflammatory and metabolic changes in the niche microenvironment. HSC dysfunction is driven by a decline in supportive niche factors, increased production of inflammatory cytokines, and shifts in lipid metabolism.
Vascular changes exacerbate these effects further, as aged BM endothelial cells exhibit reduced expression of key niche factors, such as CXCL12 and SCF, while increasing vascular permeability and ROS levels. In a similar manner, the loss of sympathetic nerve innervation leads to impaired adrenergic signaling and the disruption of the circadian regulation of HSC migration, as well as the alteration of the balance of supportive stromal cells. These changes collectively create an environment that promotes HSC aging and deterioration.
The role of BM macrophages in HSC regulation is also altered with age, as their efferocytic capacity declines, which leads to local inflammation and increased IL-1β production. This inflammatory shift further skews hematopoiesis toward myeloid expansion, reinforcing the cycle of immune dysfunction. Meanwhile, adipocyte-derived factors such as DPP4, leptin, and adiponectin play critical roles in the modulation of HSC quiescence and differentiation. For this reason, their differential expression in aging BM contributes to hematopoietic imbalance.
Despite these detrimental changes, emerging therapeutic strategies offer potential avenues for intervention. The pharmacological modulation of β-adrenergic receptors has shown promise in restoring niche function and improving aged HSC engraftment. Targeting DPP4 or enhancing osteopontin signaling could mitigate age-associated hematopoietic defects, as well. While therapies like DPP4 inhibition and β-adrenergic modulation show promise in restoring aged BM function, they are not strictly BMAd-specific. Therefore, further research is needed to improve targeting specificity and assess long-term effects, as well as to identify novel therapeutic targets.
In conclusion, the aging BM niche undergoes profound structural and functional changes that impair HSC function and contribute to immune system decline. Understanding the intricate interactions between BMAds, vascular and neural components, and immunological factors will be essential for the future development of strategies to counteract age-related hematopoietic dysfunction and for improving immune resilience in older individuals.

Author Contributions

P.J.R.: Investigation, Conceptualization, Writing—original draft. P.M.: Writing—original draft, Investigation. U.Š.: Supervision, Writing—review, Investigation, Editing. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was partially supported by the program P3-0371 of the Slovenian Research Agency.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Abbreviations

The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript:
AbbreviationExplanation
AECsArteriolar Endothelial Cells
ANGPT1Angiopoietin-1
BMBone Marrow
BMAdsBone Marrow Adipocytes
BMASBone Marrow Adiposity Society
BMATBone Marrow Adipose Tissue
BMABone Marrow Adiposity
BMSCsBone Marrow Stromal Cells
CAR cellsCXCL12-abundant Reticular Cells
Cxcl12/CXCL12C-X-C Motif Chemokine Ligand 12
cBMATConstitutive Bone Marrow Adipose Tissue
CDCluster of Differentiation
DPP4Dipeptidyl Peptidase 4
ECMExtracellular Matrix
ECsEndothelial Cells
FAFatty Acid
FGF1Fibroblast Growth Factor 1
GP130Glycoprotein 130
HSCsHematopoietic Stem Cells
HSPCsHematopoietic Stem and Progenitor Cells
ILInterleukin (e.g., IL-6, IL-1β)
LT-HSCsLong-Term Hematopoietic Stem Cells
LepRLeptin Receptor
Mφ/MΦMacrophage
NG2Neural/Glial Antigen 2
OPNOsteopontin
PDGFRαPlatelet-Derived Growth Factor Receptor Alpha
PTNPleiotrophin
RANKLReceptor Activator of Nuclear Factor Kappa-Β Ligand
rBMATRegulated Bone Marrow Adipose Tissue
ROSReactive Oxygen Species
SCFStem Cell Factor
SECsSinusoidal Endothelial Cells
TGFβ/TGF-β1Transforming Growth Factor Beta
THPOThrombopoietin
TregsRegulatory T Cells
VCAM1Vascular Cell Adhesion Molecule 1

References

  1. Mcgeer, P.L.; Mcgeer, E.G. Inflammation and the degenerative diseases of aging. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 2004, 1035, 104–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Amor, S.; Peferoen, L.A.N.; Vogel, D.Y.S.; Breur, M.; van der Valk, P.; Baker, D.; van Noort, J.M. Inflammation in neurodegenerative diseases—An update. Immunology 2014, 142, 151–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Gustafson, C.E.; Kim, C.; Weyand, C.M.; Goronzy, J.J. Influence of immune aging on vaccine responses. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2020, 145, 1309–1321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Foster, A.D.; Sivarapatna, A.; Gress, R.E. The aging immune system and its relationship with cancer. Aging Health 2011, 7, 707–718. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Goronzy, J.J.; Weyand, C.M. Immune aging and autoimmunity. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 2012, 69, 1615–1623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Nikolich-Žugich, J. Author Correction: The twilight of immunity: Emerging concepts in aging of the immune system. Nat. Immunol. 2018, 19, 1146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Colijn, C.; Mackey, M.C. A mathematical model of hematopoiesis--I. Periodic chronic myelogenous leukemia. J. Theor. Biol. 2005, 237, 117–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Laurenti, E.; Gottgens, B. From haematopoietic stem cells to complex differentiation landscapes. Nature 2018, 553, 418–426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Haas, S.; Trumpp, A.; Milsom, M.D. Causes and Consequences of Hematopoietic Stem Cell Heterogeneity. Cell Stem Cell 2018, 22, 627–638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Fliedner, T.; Graessle, D.; Paulsen, C.; Reimers, K. Structure and function of bone marrow hemopoiesis: Mechanisms of response to ionizing radiation exposure. Cancer Biother. Radiopharm. 2002, 17, 405–426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Silva, A.; Anderson, A.R.A.; Gatenby, R. A multiscale model of the bone marrow and hematopoiesis. Math. Biosci. Eng. 2011, 8, 643–658. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  12. Kaushansky, K. Lineage-specific hematopoietic growth factors. N. Engl. J. Med. 2006, 354, 2034–2045. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Jagannathan-Bogdan, M.; Zon, L.I. Hematopoiesis. Development 2013, 140, 2463–2467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Crisafulli, L.; Ficara, F. Micro-RNAs: A safety net to protect hematopoietic stem cell self-renewal. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. RNA 2022, 13, e1693. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Basilico, S.; Göttgens, B. Dysregulation of haematopoietic stem cell regulatory programs in acute myeloid leukaemia. J. Mol. Med. 2017, 95, 719–727. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Wilson, A.; Laurenti, E.; Trumpp, A. Balancing dormant and self-renewing hematopoietic stem cells. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 2009, 19, 461–468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Cho, H.J.; Lee, J.; Yoon, S.R.; Lee, H.G.; Jung, H. Regulation of Hematopoietic Stem Cell Fate and Malignancy. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 4780. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Lee, Y.; Decker, M.; Lee, H.; Ding, L. Extrinsic regulation of hematopoietic stem cells in development, homeostasis and diseases. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Dev. Biol. 2017, 6, e279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Schofield, R. The relationship between the spleen colony-forming cell and the haemopoietic stem cell. Blood Cells 1978, 4, 7–25. [Google Scholar]
  20. Lee-Thedieck, C.; Schertl, P.; Klein, G. The extracellular matrix of hematopoietic stem cell niches. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2021, 181, 114069. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Wilson, A.; Trumpp, A. Bone-marrow haematopoietic-stem-cell niches. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2006, 6, 93–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Karigane, D.; Takubo, K. Metabolic regulation of hematopoietic and leukemic stem/progenitor cells under homeostatic and stress conditions. Int. J. Hematol. 2017, 106, 18–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Horowitz, M.C.; Berry, R.; Holtrup, B.; Sebo, Z.; Nelson, T.; Fretz, J.A.; Lindskog, D.; Kaplan, J.L.; Rodeheffer, M.S.; Bone, C.J.R. Bone marrow adipocytes. Adipocyte 2017, 6, 193–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Bravenboer, N.; Bredella, M.A.; Chauveau, C.; Corsi, A.; Douni, E.; Ferris, W.F.; Riminucci, M.; Robey, P.G.; Rojas-Sutterlin, S.; Rosen, C.; et al. Standardised Nomenclature, Abbreviations, and Units for the Study of Bone Marrow Adiposity: Report of the Nomenclature Working Group of the International Bone Marrow Adiposity Society. Front. Endocrinol. 2020, 10, 923. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Chen, J.; Hendriks, M.; Chatzis, A.; Ramasamy, S.K.; Kusumbe, A.P. Bone Vasculature and Bone Marrow Vascular Niches in Health and Disease. J. Bone Miner. Res. 2020, 35, 2103–2120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Maryanovich, M.; Takeishi, S.; Frenette, P.S. Neural Regulation of Bone and Bone Marrow. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med. 2018, 8, a031344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Morrison, S.J.; Scadden, D.T. The bone marrow niche for haematopoietic stem cells. Nature 2014, 505, 327–334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Pinho, S.; Frenette, P.S. Haematopoietic stem cell activity and interactions with the niche. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2019, 20, 303–320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Poulos, M.G.; Guo, P.; Kofler, N.M.; Pinho, S.; Gutkin, M.C.; Tikhonova, A.; Aifantis, I.; Frenette, P.S.; Kitajewski, J.; Rafii, S.; et al. Endothelial Jagged-1 is necessary for homeostatic and regenerative hematopoiesis. Cell Rep. 2013, 4, 1022–1034. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Ding, L.; Morrison, S.J. Haematopoietic stem cells and early lymphoid progenitors occupy distinct bone marrow niches. Nature 2013, 495, 231–235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Greenbaum, A.; Hsu, Y.-M.S.; Day, R.B.; Schuettpelz, L.G.; Christopher, M.J.; Borgerding, J.N.; Nagasawa, T.; Link, D.C. CXCL12 in early mesenchymal progenitors is required for haematopoietic stem-cell maintenance. Nature 2013, 495, 227–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Yao, L.; Yokota, T.; Xia, L.; Kincade, P.W.; McEver, R.P. Bone marrow dysfunction in mice lacking the cytokine receptor gp130 in endothelial cells. Blood 2005, 106, 4093–4101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Ding, L.; Saunders, T.L.; Enikolopov, G.; Morrison, S.J. Endothelial and perivascular cells maintain haematopoietic stem cells. Nature 2012, 481, 457–462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Xu, C.; Gao, X.; Wei, Q.; Nakahara, F.; Zimmerman, S.E.; Mar, J.; Frenette, P.S. Stem cell factor is selectively secreted by arterial endothelial cells in bone marrow. Nat. Commun. 2018, 9, 2449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Zhou, B.O.; Ding, L.; Morrison, S.J. Hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells regulate the regeneration of their niche by secreting Angiopoietin-1. eLife 2015, 4, e05521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Asada, N.; Kunisaki, Y.; Pierce, H.; Wang, Z.; Fernandez, N.F.; Birbrair, A.; Ma’ayan, A.; Frenette, P.S. Differential cytokine contributions of perivascular haematopoietic stem cell niches. Nat. Cell Biol. 2017, 19, 214–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Nombela-Arrieta, C.; Pivarnik, G.; Winkel, B.; Canty, K.J.; Harley, B.; Mahoney, J.E.; Park, S.-Y.; Liu, J.; Protopopov, A.; Silberstein, L.E. Quantitative imaging of haematopoietic stem and progenitor cell localization and hypoxic status in the bone marrow microenvironment. Nat. Cell Biol. 2013, 15, 533–543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Itkin, T.; Gur-Cohen, S.; Spencer, J.A.; Schajnovitz, A.; Ramasamy, S.K.; Kusumbe, A.P.; Ledergor, G.; Jung, Y.; Milo, I.; Poulos, M.G.; et al. Distinct bone marrow blood vessels differentially regulate haematopoiesis. Nature 2016, 532, 323–328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Bellinger, D.L.; Lorton, D.; Felten, S.Y.; Felten, D.L. Innervation of lymphoid organs and implications in development, aging, and autoimmunity. Int. J. Immunopharmacol. 1992, 14, 329–344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Bajayo, A.; Bar, A.; Denes, A.; Bachar, M.; Kram, V.; Attar-Namdar, M.; Zallone, A.; Kovács, K.J.; Yirmiya, R.; Bab, I. Skeletal parasympathetic innervation communicates central IL-1 signals regulating bone mass accrual. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2012, 109, 15455–15460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Mach, D.; Rogers, S.; Sabino, M.; Luger, N.; Schwei, M.; Pomonis, J.; Keyser, C.; Clohisy, D.; Adams, D.; O’leary, P.; et al. Origins of skeletal pain: Sensory and sympathetic innervation of the mouse femur. Neuroscience 2002, 113, 155–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Jung, W.-C.; Levesque, J.-P.; Ruitenberg, M.J. It takes nerve to fight back: The significance of neural innervation of the bone marrow and spleen for immune function. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. 2017, 61, 60–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Petit, I.; Szyper-Kravitz, M.; Nagler, A.; Lahav, M.; Peled, A.; Habler, L.; Ponomaryov, T.; Taichman, R.S.; Arenzana-Seisdedos, F.; Fujii, N.; et al. G-CSF induces stem cell mobilization by decreasing bone marrow SDF-1 and up-regulating CXCRNat. Nat. Immunol. 2002, 3, 687–694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Hattori, K.; Heissig, B.; Tashiro, K.; Honjo, T.; Tateno, M.; Shieh, J.-H.; Hackett, N.R.; Quitoriano, M.S.; Crystal, R.G.; Rafii, S.; et al. Plasma elevation of stromal cell–derived factor-1 induces mobilization of mature and immature hematopoietic progenitor and stem cells. Blood 2001, 97, 3354–3360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Katayama, Y.; Battista, M.; Kao, W.-M.; Hidalgo, A.; Peired, A.J.; Thomas, S.A.; Frenette, P.A. Signals from the sympathetic nervous system regulate hematopoietic stem cell egress from bone marrow. Cell 2006, 124, 407–421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Méndez-Ferrer, S.; Lucas, D.; Battista, M.; Frenette, P.S. Haematopoietic stem cell release is regulated by circadian oscillations. Nature 2008, 452, 442–447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Asada, N.; Katayama, Y.; Sato, M.; Minagawa, K.; Wakahashi, K.; Kawano, H.; Kawano, Y.; Sada, A.; Ikeda, K.; Matsui, T.; et al. Matrix-embedded osteocytes regulate mobilization of hematopoietic stem/progenitor cells. Cell Stem Cell 2013, 12, 737–747. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Semerad, C.L.; Christopher, M.J.; Liu, F.; Short, B.; Simmons, P.J.; Winkler, I.; Levesque, J.-P.; Chappel, J.; Ross, F.P.; Link, D.C. G-CSF potently inhibits osteoblast activity and CXCL12 mRNA expression in the bone marrow. Blood 2005, 106, 3020–3027. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Christopher, M.J.; Rao, M.; Liu, F.; Woloszynek, J.R.; Link, D.C. Expression of the G-CSF receptor in monocytic cells is sufficient to mediate hematopoietic progenitor mobilization by G-CSF in mice. J. Exp. Med. 2011, 208, 251–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Méndez-Ferrer, S.; Michurina, T.V.; Ferraro, F.; Mazloom, A.R.; MacArthur, B.D.; Lira, S.A.; Scadden, D.T.; Ma’ayan, A.; Enikolopov, G.N.; Frenette, P.S. Mesenchymal and haematopoietic stem cells form a unique bone marrow niche. Nature 2010, 466, 829–834. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Lucas, D.; Battista, M.; Shi, P.A.; Isola, L.; Frenette, P.S. Mobilized hematopoietic stem cell yield depends on species-specific circadian timing. Cell Stem Cell 2008, 3, 364–366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Spiegel, A.; Shivtiel, S.; Kalinkovich, A.; Ludin, A.; Netzer, N.; Goichberg, P.; Azaria, Y.; Resnick, I.; Hardan, I.; Ben-Hur, H.; et al. Catecholaminergic neurotransmitters regulate migration and repopulation of immature human CD34+ cells through Wnt signaling. Nat. Immunol. 2007, 8, 1123–1131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Yamazaki, S.; Ema, H.; Karlsson, G.; Yamaguchi, T.; Miyoshi, H.; Shioda, S.; Taketo, M.M.; Karlsson, S.; Iwama, A.; Nakauchi, H. Nonmyelinating Schwann cells maintain hematopoietic stem cell hibernation in the bone marrow niche. Cell 2011, 147, 1146–1158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Bjurholm, A.; Kreicbergs, A.; Brodin, E.; Schultzberg, M. Substance P- and CGRP-immunoreactive nerves in bone. Peptides 1988, 9, 165–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Yoshino, K.; Suzuki, M.; Kawarai, Y.; Sakuma, Y.; Inoue, G.; Orita, S.; Yamauchi, K.; Aoki, Y.; Ishikawa, T.; Miyagi, M.; et al. Increase of TRPV1-immunoreactivity in dorsal root ganglia neurons innervating the femur in a rat model of osteoporosis. Yonsei Med. J. 2014, 55, 1600–1605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Rameshwar, P.; Gascon, P. Substance P (SP) mediates production of stem cell factor and interleukin-1 in bone marrow stroma: Potential autoregulatory role for these cytokines in SP receptor expression and induction. Blood 1995, 86, 482–490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Broome, C.S.; Miyan, J.A. Neuropeptide Control of Bone Marrow Neutrophil Production: A Key Axis for Neuroimmunomodulation. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 2000, 917, 424–434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Artico, M.; Bosco, S.; Cavallotti, C.; Agostinelli, E.; Giuliani-Piccari, G.; Sciorio, S.; Cocco, L.; Vitale, M. Noradrenergic and cholinergic innervation of the bone marrow. Int. J. Mol. Med. 2002, 10, 77–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Pierce, H.; Zhang, D.; Magnon, C.; Lucas, D.; Christin, J.R.; Huggins, M.; Schwartz, G.J.; Frenette, P.S. Cholinergic Signals from the CNS Regulate G-CSF-Mediated HSC Mobilization from Bone Marrow via a Glucocorticoid Signaling Relay. Cell Stem Cell 2017, 20, 648–658.e4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Frenette, P.S.; Pinho, S.; Lucas, D.; Scheiermann, C. Mesenchymal stem cell: Keystone of the hematopoietic stem cell niche and a stepping-stone for regenerative medicine. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 2013, 31, 285–316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Chan, C.K.F.; Chen, C.-C.; Luppen, C.A.; Kim, J.-B.; DeBoer, A.T.; Wei, K.; Helms, J.A.; Kuo, C.J.; Kraft, D.L.; Weissman, I.L. Endochondral ossification is required for haematopoietic stem-cell niche formation. Nature 2009, 457, 490–494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Sacchetti, B.; Funari, A.; Michienzi, S.; Di Cesare, S.; Piersanti, S.; Saggio, I.; Tagliafico, E.; Ferrari, S.; Robey, P.G.; Riminucci, M.; et al. Self-renewing osteoprogenitors in bone marrow sinusoids can organize a hematopoietic microenvironment. Cell 2007, 131, 324–336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Pinho, S.; Lacombe, J.; Hanoun, M.; Mizoguchi, T.; Bruns, I.; Kunisaki, Y.; Frenette, P.S. PDGFRα and CD51 mark human Nestin+ sphere-forming mesenchymal stem cells capable of hematopoietic progenitor cell expansion. J. Exp. Med. 2013, 210, 1351–1367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Sugiyama, T.; Kohara, H.; Noda, M.; Nagasawa, T. Maintenance of the hematopoietic stem cell pool by cxcl12-cxcr4 chemokine signaling in bone marrow stromal cell niches. Immunity 2006, 25, 977–988. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Omatsu, Y.; Sugiyama, T.; Kohara, H.; Kondoh, G.; Fujii, N.; Kohno, K.; Nagasawa, T. The essential functions of adipo-osteogenic progenitors as the hematopoietic stem and progenitor cell niche. Immunity 2010, 33, 387–399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Gomes, A.C.; Hara, T.; Lim, V.Y.; Herndler-Brandstetter, D.; Nevius, E.; Sugiyama, T.; Tani-Ichi, S.; Schlenner, S.; Richie, E.; Rodewald, H.-R.; et al. Hematopoietic Stem Cell Niches Produce Lineage-Instructive Signals to Control Multipotent Progenitor Differentiation. Immunity 2016, 45, 1219–1231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Yue, R.; Zhou, B.O.; Shimada, I.S.; Zhao, Z.; Morrison, S.J. Leptin Receptor Promotes Adipogenesis and Reduces Osteogenesis by Regulating Mesenchymal Stromal Cells in Adult Bone Marrow. Cell Stem Cell 2016, 18, 782–796. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Zhou, B.O.; Yue, R.; Murphy, M.M.; Peyer, J.G.; Morrison, S.J. Leptin-receptor-expressing mesenchymal stromal cells represent the main source of bone formed by adult bone marrow. Cell Stem Cell 2014, 15, 154–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Kunisaki, Y.; Bruns, I.; Scheiermann, C.; Ahmed, J.; Pinho, S.; Zhang, D.; Mizoguchi, T.; Wei, Q.; Lucas, D.; Ito, K.; et al. Arteriolar niches maintain haematopoietic stem cell quiescence. Nature 2013, 502, 637–643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Mizoguchi, T.; Pinho, S.; Ahmed, J.; Kunisaki, Y.; Hanoun, M.; Mendelson, A.; Ono, N.; Kronenberg, H.M.; Frenette, P.S. Osterix marks distinct waves of primitive and definitive stromal progenitors during bone marrow development. Dev. Cell 2014, 29, 340–349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Himburg, H.A.; Termini, C.M.; Schlussel, L.; Kan, J.; Li, M.; Zhao, L.; Fang, T.; Sasine, J.P.; Chang, V.Y.; Chute, J.P. Distinct Bone Marrow Sources of Pleiotrophin Control Hematopoietic Stem Cell Maintenance and Regeneration. Cell Stem Cell 2018, 23, 370–381.e5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Lord, B.I.; Testa, N.G.; Hendry, J.H. The relative spatial distributions of CFUs and CFUc in the normal mouse femur. Blood 1975, 46, 65–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Gong, J.K. Endosteal marrow: A rich source of hematopoietic stem cells. Science 1978, 199, 1443–1445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Nilsson, S.K.; Johnston, H.M.; Coverdale, J.A. Spatial localization of transplanted hemopoietic stem cells: Inferences for the localization of stem cell niches. Blood 2001, 97, 2293–2299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Taichman, R.; Reilly, M.; Emerson, S. Human osteoblasts support human hematopoietic progenitor cells in vitro bone marrow cultures. Blood 1996, 87, 518–524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Calvi, L.M.; Adams, G.B.; Weibrecht, K.W.; Weber, J.M.; Olson, D.P.; Knight, M.C.; Martin, R.P.; Schipani, E.; Divieti, P.; Bringhurst, F.R.; et al. Osteoblastic cells regulate the haematopoietic stem cell niche. Nature 2003, 425, 841–846. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Zhang, J.; Niu, C.; Ye, L.; Huang, H.; He, X.; Tong, W.-G.; Ross, J.; Haug, J.; Johnson, T.; Feng, J.Q.; et al. Identification of the haematopoietic stem cell niche and control of the niche size. Nature 2003, 425, 836–841. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Visnjic, D.; Kalajzic, Z.; Rowe, D.W.; Katavic, V.; Lorenzo, J.; Aguila, H.L. Hematopoiesis is severely altered in mice with an induced osteoblast deficiency. Blood 2004, 103, 3258–3264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Stier, S.; Ko, Y.; Forkert, R.; Lutz, C.; Neuhaus, T.; Grünewald, E.; Cheng, T.; Dombkowski, D.; Calvi, L.M.; Rittling, S.R.; et al. Osteopontin is a hematopoietic stem cell niche component that negatively regulates stem cell pool size. J. Exp. Med. 2005, 201, 1781–1791. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Nilsson, S.K.; Johnston, H.M.; Whitty, G.A.; Williams, B.; Webb, R.J.; Denhardt, D.T.; Bertoncello, I.; Bendall, L.J.; Simmons, P.J.; Haylock, D.N. Osteopontin, a key component of the hematopoietic stem cell niche and regulator of primitive hematopoietic progenitor cells. Blood 2005, 106, 1232–1239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Arai, F.; Hirao, A.; Ohmura, M.; Sato, H.; Matsuoka, S.; Takubo, K.; Ito, K.; Koh, G.Y.; Suda, T. Tie2/angiopoietin-1 signaling regulates hematopoietic stem cell quiescence in the bone marrow niche. Cell 2004, 118, 149–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Qian, H.; Buza-Vidas, N.; Hyland, C.D.; Jensen, C.T.; Antonchuk, J.; Månsson, R.; Thoren, L.A.; Ekblom, M.; Alexander, W.S.; Jacobsen, S.E.W. Critical role of thrombopoietin in maintaining adult quiescent hematopoietic stem cells. Cell Stem Cell 2007, 1, 671–684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Yoshihara, H.; Arai, F.; Hosokawa, K.; Hagiwara, T.; Takubo, K.; Nakamura, Y.; Gomei, Y.; Iwasaki, H.; Matsuoka, S.; Miyamoto, K.; et al. Thrombopoietin/MPL signaling regulates hematopoietic stem cell quiescence and interaction with the osteoblastic niche. Cell Stem Cell 2007, 1, 685–697. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Decker, M.; Leslie, J.; Liu, Q.; Ding, L. Hepatic thrombopoietin is required for bone marrow hematopoietic stem cell maintenance. Science 2018, 360, 106–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Zhu, J.; Garrett, R.; Jung, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Kim, N.; Wang, J.; Joe, G.J.; Hexner, E.; Choi, Y.; Taichman, R.S.; et al. Osteoblasts support B-lymphocyte commitment and differentiation from hematopoietic stem cells. Blood 2007, 109, 3706–3712. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Yu, V.W.; Saez, B.; Cook, C.; Lotinun, S.; Pardo-Saganta, A.; Wang, Y.-H.; Lymperi, S.; Ferraro, F.; Raaijmakers, M.H.; Wu, J.Y.; et al. Specific bone cells produce DLL4 to generate thymus-seeding progenitors from bone marrow. J. Exp. Med. 2015, 212, 759–774. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Naveiras, O.; Nardi, V.; Wenzel, P.L.; Hauschka, P.V.; Fahey, F.; Daley, G.Q. Bone-marrow adipocytes as negative regulators of the haematopoietic microenvironment. Nature 2009, 460, 259–263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Zhu, R.-J.; Wu, M.-Q.; Li, Z.-J.; Zhang, Y.; Liu, K.-Y. Hematopoietic recovery following chemotherapy is improved by BADGE-induced inhibition of adipogenesis. Int. J. Hematol. 2013, 97, 58–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Ambrosi, T.H.; Scialdone, A.; Graja, A.; Gohlke, S.; Jank, A.-M.; Bocian, C.; Woelk, L.; Fan, H.; Logan, D.W.; Schürmann, A.; et al. Adipocyte Accumulation in the Bone Marrow during Obesity and Aging Impairs Stem Cell-Based Hematopoietic and Bone Regeneration. Cell Stem Cell 2017, 20, 771–784.e6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Zhou, B.O.; Yu, H.; Yue, R.; Zhao, Z.; Rios, J.J.; Naveiras, O.; Morrison, S.J. Bone marrow adipocytes promote the regeneration of stem cells and haematopoiesis by secreting SCF. Nat. Cell Biol. 2017, 19, 891–903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Bruns, I.; Lucas, D.; Pinho, S.; Ahmed, J.; Lambert, M.P.; Kunisaki, Y.; Scheiermann, C.; Schiff, L.; Poncz, M.; Bergman, A.; et al. Megakaryocytes regulate hematopoietic stem cell quiescence through CXCL4 secretion. Nat. Med. 2014, 20, 1315–1320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  92. Zhao, M.; Perry, J.M.; Marshall, H.; Venkatraman, A.; Qian, P.; He, X.C.; Ahamed, J.; Li, L. Megakaryocytes maintain homeostatic quiescence and promote post-injury regeneration of hematopoietic stem cells. Nat. Med. 2014, 20, 1321–1326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. Nakamura-Ishizu, A.; Takubo, K.; Fujioka, M.; Suda, T. Megakaryocytes are essential for HSC quiescence through the production of thrombopoietin. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2014, 454, 353–357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Nakamura-Ishizu, A.; Takubo, K.; Kobayashi, H.; Suzuki-Inoue, K.; Suda, T. CLEC-2 in megakaryocytes is critical for maintenance of hematopoietic stem cells in the bone marrow. J. Exp. Med. 2015, 212, 2133–2146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Yamamoto, R.; Morita, Y.; Ooehara, J.; Hamanaka, S.; Onodera, M.; Rudolph, K.L.; Ema, H.; Nakauchi, H. Clonal analysis unveils self-renewing lineage-restricted progenitors generated directly from hematopoietic stem cells. Cell 2013, 154, 1112–1126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Sanjuan-Pla, A.; Macaulay, I.C.; Jensen, C.T.; Woll, P.S.; Luis, T.C.; Mead, A.; Moore, S.; Carella, C.; Matsuoka, S.; Jones, T.B.; et al. Platelet-biased stem cells reside at the apex of the haematopoietic stem-cell hierarchy. Nature 2013, 502, 232–236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Pinho, S.; Marchand, T.; Yang, E.; Wei, Q.; Nerlov, C.; Frenette, P.S. Lineage-Biased Hematopoietic Stem Cells Are Regulated by Distinct Niches. Dev. Cell 2018, 44, 634–641.e4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Jiang, L.; Han, X.; Wang, J.; Wang, C.; Sun, X.; Xie, J.; Wu, G.; Phan, H.; Liu, Z.; Yeh, E.T.; et al. SHP-1 regulates hematopoietic stem cell quiescence by coordinating TGF-β signaling. J. Exp. Med. 2018, 215, 1337–1347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Hérault, A.; Binnewies, M.; Leong, S.; Calero-Nieto, F.J.; Zhang, S.Y.; Kang, Y.A.; Wang, X.; Pietras, E.M.; Chu, S.H.; Barry-Holson, K.; et al. Myeloid progenitor cluster formation drives emergency and leukaemic myelopoiesis. Nature 2017, 544, 53–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Chow, A.; Lucas, D.; Hidalgo, A.; Méndez-Ferrer, S.; Hashimoto, D.; Scheiermann, C.; Battista, M.; Leboeuf, M.; Prophete, C.; van Rooijen, N.; et al. Bone marrow CD169+ macrophages promote the retention of hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells in the mesenchymal stem cell niche. J. Exp. Med. 2011, 208, 261–271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Winkler, I.G.; Sims, N.A.; Pettit, A.R.; Barbier, V.; Nowlan, B.; Helwani, F.; Poulton, I.J.; Van Rooijen, N.; Alexander, K.; Raggatt, L.J.; et al. Bone marrow macrophages maintain hematopoietic stem cell (HSC) niches and their depletion mobilizes HSCs. Blood 2010, 116, 4815–4828. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  102. Casanova-Acebes, M.; Pitaval, C.; Weiss, L.A.; Nombela-Arrieta, C.; Chèvre, R.; A-González, N.; Kunisaki, Y.; Zhang, D.; van Rooijen, N.; Silberstein, L.E.; et al. Rhythmic modulation of the hematopoietic niche through neutrophil clearance. Cell 2013, 153, 1025–1035. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  103. Bowers, E.; Slaughter, A.; Frenette, P.S.; Kuick, R.; Pello, O.M.; Lucas, D. Granulocyte-derived TNFα promotes vascular and hematopoietic regeneration in the bone marrow. Nat. Med. 2018, 24, 95–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  104. Zhang, J.; Supakorndej, T.; Krambs, J.R.; Rao, M.; Abou-Ezzi, G.; Ye, R.Y.; Li, S.; Trinkaus, K.; Link, D.C. Bone marrow dendritic cells regulate hematopoietic stem/progenitor cell trafficking. J. Clin. Investig. 2019, 129, 2920–2931. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Gandy, K.L.; Domen, J.; Aguila, H.; Weissman, I.L. CD8+TCR+ and CD8+TCR Cells in whole bone marrow facilitate the engraftment of hematopoietic stem cells across allogeneic barriers. Immunity 1999, 11, 579–590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Kaufman, C.L.; Colson, Y.L.; Wren, S.M.; Watkins, S.; Simmons, R.L.; Ildstad, S.T. Phenotypic characterization of a novel bone marrow-derived cell that facilitates engraftment of allogeneic bone marrow stem cells. Blood 1994, 84, 2436–2446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Fujisaki, J.; Wu, J.; Carlson, A.L.; Silberstein, L.; Putheti, P.; Larocca, R.; Gao, W.; Saito, T.I.; Celso, C.L.; Tsuyuzaki, H.; et al. In vivo imaging of Treg cells providing immune privilege to the haematopoietic stem-cell niche. Nature 2011, 474, 216–219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Hirata, Y.; Furuhashi, K.; Ishii, H.; Li, H.W.; Pinho, S.; Ding, L.; Robson, S.C.; Frenette, P.S.; Fujisaki, J. CD150high Bone Marrow Tregs Maintain Hematopoietic Stem Cell Quiescence and Immune Privilege via Adenosine. Cell Stem Cell 2018, 22, 445–453.e5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Geiger, H.; de Haan, G.; Florian, M.C. The ageing haematopoietic stem cell compartment. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2013, 13, 376–389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Morrison, S.J.; Wandycz, A.M.; Akashi, K.; Globerson, A.; Weissman, I.L. The aging of hematopoietic stem cells. Nat. Med. 1996, 2, 1011–1016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. De Haan, G.; Nijhof, W.; Van Zant, G. Mouse strain-dependent changes in frequency and proliferation of hematopoietic stem cells during aging: Correlation between lifespan and cycling activity. Blood 1997, 89, 1543–1550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  112. Rossi, D.J.; Bryder, D.; Zahn, J.M.; Ahlenius, H.; Sonu, R.; Wagers, A.J.; Weissman, I.L. Cell intrinsic alterations underlie hematopoietic stem cell aging. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2005, 102, 9194–9199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  113. Dykstra, B.; Olthof, S.; Schreuder, J.; Ritsema, M.; de Haan, G. Clonal analysis reveals multiple functional defects of aged murine hematopoietic stem cells. J. Exp. Med. 2011, 208, 2691–2703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  114. Chen, J.; Astle, C.M.; Harrison, D.E. Development and aging of primitive hematopoietic stem cells in BALB/cBy mice. Exp. Hematol. 1999, 27, 928–935. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Maryanovich, M.; Zahalka, A.H.; Pierce, H.; Pinho, S.; Nakahara, F.; Asada, N.; Wei, Q.; Wang, X.; Ciero, P.; Xu, J.; et al. Adrenergic nerve degeneration in bone marrow drives aging of the hematopoietic stem cell niche. Nat. Med. 2018, 24, 782–791. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Florian, M.C.; Dörr, K.; Niebel, A.; Daria, D.; Schrezenmeier, H.; Rojewski, M.; Filippi, M.-D.; Hasenberg, A.; Gunzer, M.; Scharffetter-Kochanek, K.; et al. Cdc42 activity regulates hematopoietic stem cell aging and rejuvenation. Cell Stem Cell 2012, 10, 520–530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Xing, Z.; Ryan, M.A.; Daria, D.; Nattamai, K.J.; Van Zant, G.; Wang, L.; Zheng, Y.; Geiger, H. Increased hematopoietic stem cell mobilization in aged mice. Blood 2006, 108, 2190–2197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Geiger, H.; Koehler, A.; Gunzer, M. Stem Cells, Aging, niche, adhesion and cdc42: A model for changes in cell-cell interactions and hematopoietic stem cell aging. Cell Cycle 2007, 6, 884–887. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Liang, Y.; Van Zant, G.; Szilvassy, S.J. Effects of aging on the homing and engraftment of murine hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells. Blood 2005, 106, 1479–1487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Beerman, I.; Maloney, W.J.; Weissmann, I.L.; Rossi, D.J. Stem cells and the aging hematopoietic system. Curr. Opin. Immunol. 2010, 22, 500–506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Mejia-Ramirez, E.; Florian, M.C. Understanding intrinsic hematopoietic stem cell aging. Haematologica 2020, 105, 22–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  122. Frisch, B.J.; Hoffman, C.M.; Latchney, S.E.; LaMere, M.W.; Myers, J.; Ashton, J.; Li, A.J.; Saunders, J.; Palis, J.; Perkins, A.S.; et al. Aged marrow macrophages expand platelet-biased hematopoietic stem cells via interleukin-1B. J. Clin. Investig. 2019, 4, e124213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  123. Wang, Y.; Subramanian, M.; Yurdagul, A.; Barbosa-Lorenzi, V.C.; Cai, B.; de Juan-Sanz, J.; Ryan, T.A.; Nomura, M.; Maxfield, F.R.; Tabas, I. Mitochondrial Fission Promotes the Continued Clearance of Apoptotic Cells by Macrophages. Cell 2017, 171, 331–345.e22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  124. Vandivier, R.W.; Henson, P.M.; Douglas, I.S. Burying the dead: The impact of failed apoptotic cell removal (efferocytosis) on chronic inflammatory lung disease. Chest 2006, 129, 1673–1682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  125. Arandjelovic, S.; Ravichandran, K.S. Phagocytosis of apoptotic cells in homeostasis. Nat. Immunol. 2015, 16, 907–917. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Pietras, E.M.; Mirantes-Barbeito, C.; Fong, S.; Loeffler, D.; Kovtonyuk, L.V.; Zhang, S.; Lakshminarasimhan, R.; Chin, C.P.; Techner, J.-M.; Will, B.; et al. Chronic interleukin-1 exposure drives haematopoietic stem cells towards precocious myeloid differentiation at the expense of self-renewal. Nat. Cell Biol. 2016, 18, 607–618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Kusumbe, A.P.; Ramasamy, S.K.; Itkin, T.; Mäe, M.A.; Langen, U.H.; Betsholtz, C.; Lapidot, T.; Adams, R.H. Age-dependent modulation of vascular niches for haematopoietic stem cells. Nature 2016, 532, 380–384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Poulos, M.G.; Ramalingam, P.; Gutkin, M.C.; Llanos, P.; Gilleran, K.; Rabbany, S.Y.; Butler, J.M. Endothelial transplantation rejuvenates aged hematopoietic stem cell function. J. Clin. Investig. 2017, 127, 4163–4178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Scheiermann, C.; Kunisaki, Y.; Lucas, D.; Chow, A.; Jang, J.-E.; Zhang, D.; Hashimoto, D.; Merad, M.; Frenette, P.S. Adrenergic nerves govern circadian leukocyte recruitment to tissues. Immunity 2012, 37, 290–301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Mendez-Ferrer, S.; Battista, M.; Frenette, P.S. Cooperation of β2- and β3-adrenergic receptors in hematopoietic progenitor cell mobilization. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 2010, 1192, 139–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Cabezas-Wallscheid, N.; Klimmeck, D.; Hansson, J.; Lipka, D.B.; Reyes, A.; Wang, Q.; Weichenhan, D.; Lier, A.; von Paleske, L.; Renders, S.; et al. Identification of regulatory networks in hscs and their immediate progeny via integrated proteome, transcriptome, and dna methylome analysis. Cell Stem Cell 2014, 15, 507–522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  132. Ergen, A.V.; Boles, N.C.; Goodell, M.A. Rantes/Ccl5 influences hematopoietic stem cell subtypes and causes myeloid skewing. Blood 2012, 119, 2500–2509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  133. Guidi, N.; Sacma, M.; Ständker, L.; Soller, K.; Marka, G.; Eiwen, K.; Weiss, J.M.; Kirchhoff, F.; Weil, T.; Cancelas, J.A.; et al. Osteopontin attenuates aging-associated phenotypes of hematopoietic stem cells. EMBO J. 2017, 36, 840–853. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. Li, Z.; Hardij, J.; Bagchi, D.P.; Scheller, E.L.; MacDougald, O.A. Development, regulation, metabolism and function of bone marrow adipose tissues. Bone 2018, 110, 134–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  135. Wang, L.; Zhang, H.; Wang, S.; Chen, X.; Su, J. Bone Marrow Adipocytes: A Critical Player in the Bone Marrow Microenvironment. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 2021, 9, 770705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  136. Blebea, J.S.; Houseni, M.; Torigian, D.A.; Fan, C.; Mavi, A.; Zhuge, Y.; Iwanaga, T.; Mishra, S.; Udupa, J.; Zhuang, J.; et al. Structural and functional imaging of normal bone marrow and evaluation of its age-related changes. Semin. Nucl. Med. 2007, 37, 185–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Fazeli, P.K.; Horowitz, M.C.; MacDougald, O.A.; Scheller, E.L.; Rodeheffer, M.S.; Rosen, C.J.; Klibanski, A. Marrow fat and bone--new perspectives. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2013, 98, 935–945. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  138. Justesen, J.; Stenderup, K.; Ebbesen, E.; Mosekilde, L.; Steiniche, T.; Kassem, M. Adipocyte tissue volume in bone marrow is increased with aging and in patients with osteoporosis. Biogerontology 2001, 2, 165–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Berg, B.C.V.; Lecouvet, F.E.; Moysan, P.; Maldague, B.; Jamart, J.; Malghem, J. MR assessment of red marrow distribution and composition in the proximal femur: Correlation with clinical and laboratory parameters. Skelet. Radiol. 1997, 26, 589–596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Kricun, M.E. Red-yellow marrow conversion: Its effect on the location of some solitary bone lesions. Skelet. Radiol. 1985, 14, 10–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Duda, S.H.; Laniado, M.; Schick, F.; Strayle, M.; Claussen, C.D.; Duda, M.L.S.H.; Long, S.S.; Yablon, C.M.; Eisenberg, R.L.; Shah, L.M.; et al. Normal bone marrow in the sacrum of young adults: Differences between the sexes seen on chemical-shift MR imaging. AJR J. Roentgenol. 1995, 164, 935–940. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  142. Liney, G.P.; Bernard, C.P.; Manton, D.J.; Turnbull, L.W.; Langton, C.M. Age, gender, and skeletal variation in bone marrow composition: A preliminary study at 3.0Tesla. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2007, 26, 787–793. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  143. Tavassoli, M. Marrow adipose cells. Histochemical identification of labile and stable components. Arch. Pathol. Lab. Med. 1976, 100, 16–18. [Google Scholar]
  144. Tavassoli, M.; Houchin, D.N.; Jacobs, P. Fatty acid composition of adipose cells in red and yellow marrow: A possible determinant of haematopoietic potential. Scand. J. Haematol. 1977, 18, 47–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  145. Scheller, E.L.; Doucette, C.R.; Learman, B.S.; Cawthorn, W.P.; Khandaker, S.; Schell, B.; Wu, B.; Ding, S.-Y.; Bredella, M.A.; Fazeli, P.K.; et al. Region-specific variation in the properties of skeletal adipocytes reveals regulated and constitutive marrow adipose tissues. Nat. Commun. 2015, 6, 7808. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  146. Scheller, E.L.; Khandaker, S.; Learman, B.S.; Cawthorn, W.P.; Anderson, L.M.; Pham, H.; Robles, H.; Wang, Z.; Li, Z.; Parlee, S.D.; et al. Bone marrow adipocytes resist lipolysis and remodeling in response to β-adrenergic stimulation. Bone 2019, 118, 32–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  147. Styner, M.; Pagnotti, G.M.; McGrath, C.; Wu, X.; Sen, B.; Uzer, G.; Xie, Z.; Zong, X.; Styner, M.A.; Rubin, C.T.; et al. Exercise Decreases Marrow Adipose Tissue Through ß-Oxidation in Obese Running Mice. J. Bone Miner. Res. 2017, 32, 1692–1702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  148. Bornstein, S.; Brown, S.A.; Le, P.T.; Wang, X.; DeMambro, V.; Horowitz, M.C.; MacDougald, O.; Baron, R.; Lotinun, S.; Karsenty, G.; et al. Fgf-21 and skeletal remodeling during and after lactation in C57BL/6J mice. Endocrinology 2014, 155, 3516–3526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  149. Bartell, S.M.; Rayalam, S.; Ambati, S.; Gaddam, D.R.; Hartzell, D.L.; Hamrick, M.; She, J.-X.; Della-Fera, M.A.; Baile, C.A. Central (ICV) leptin injection increases bone formation, bone mineral density, muscle mass, serum IGF-1, and the expression of osteogenic genes in leptin-deficient ob/ob mice. J. Bone Miner. Res. 2011, 26, 1710–1720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  150. Hamrick, M.W.; Della-Fera, M.A.; Choi, Y.-H.; Pennington, C.; Hartzell, D.; Baile, C.A. Leptin Treatment Induces Loss of Bone Marrow Adipocytes and Increases Bone Formation in Leptin-Deficient ob/ob Mice. J. Bone Miner. Res. 2005, 20, 994–1001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  151. Scheller, E.L.; Khoury, B.; Moller, K.L.; Wee, N.K.Y.; Khandaker, S.; Kozloff, K.M.; Abrishami, S.H.; Zamarron, B.F.; Singer, K. Changes in Skeletal Integrity and Marrow Adiposity during High-Fat Diet and after Weight Loss. Front. Endocrinol. 2016, 7, 102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  152. Devlin, M.J.; Cloutier, A.M.; Thomas, N.A.; Panus, D.A.; Lotinun, S.; Pinz, I.; Baron, R.; Rosen, C.J.; Bouxsein, M.L. Caloric restriction leads to high marrow adiposity and low bone mass in growing mice. J. Bone Miner. Res. 2010, 25, 2078–2088. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  153. Cawthorn, W.P.; Scheller, E.L.; Learman, B.S.; Parlee, S.D.; Simon, B.R.; Mori, H.; Ning, X.; Bree, A.J.; Schell, B.; Broome, D.T.; et al. Bone Marrow Adipose Tissue Is an Endocrine Organ that Contributes to Increased Circulating Adiponectin during Caloric Restriction. Cell Metab. 2014, 20, 368–375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  154. Devlin, M.J.; Rosen, C.J. The bone–fat interface: Basic and clinical implications of marrow adiposity. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2015, 3, 141–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  155. Sulston, R.J.; Learman, B.S.; Zhang, B.; Scheller, E.L.; Parlee, S.D.; Simon, B.R.; Mori, H.; Bree, A.J.; Wallace, R.J.; Krishnan, V.; et al. Increased Circulating Adiponectin in Response to Thiazolidinediones: Investigating the Role of Bone Marrow Adipose Tissue. Front. Endocrinol. 2016, 7, 128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  156. Li, G.-W.; Xu, Z.; Chen, Q.-W.; Chang, S.-X.; Tian, Y.-N.; Fan, J.-Z. The temporal characterization of marrow lipids and adipocytes in a rabbit model of glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis. Skelet. Radiol. 2013, 42, 1235–1244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  157. Wei, W.; Dutchak, P.A.; Wang, X.; Ding, X.; Wang, X.; Bookout, A.L.; Goetz, R.; Mohammadi, M.; Gerard, R.D.; Dechow, P.C.; et al. Fibroblast growth factor 21 promotes bone loss by potentiating the effects of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2012, 109, 3143–3148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  158. Botolin, S.; McCabe, L.R. Bone Loss and Increased Bone Adiposity in Spontaneous and Pharmacologically Induced Diabetic Mice. Endocrinology 2007, 148, 198–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  159. Krings, A.; Rahman, S.; Huang, S.; Lu, Y.; Czernik, P.; Lecka-Czernik, B. Bone marrow fat has brown adipose tissue characteristics, which are attenuated with aging and diabetes. Bone 2012, 50, 546–552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  160. Shergill, K.K.; Shergill, G.S.; Pillai, H.J. Gelatinous transformation of bone marrow: Rare or underdiagnosed? Autops. Case Rep. 2017, 7, 8–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  161. Oehlbeck, L.W.F.; Robscheit-Robbins, F.S.; Whipple, G.H. Marrow Hyperplasia and Hemoglobin Reserve in Experimental Anemia Due to Bleeding. J. Exp. Med. 1932, 56, 425–448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  162. Rosen, E.D.; Spiegelman, B.M. What we talk about when we talk about fat. Cell 2014, 156, 20–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  163. Krycer, J.R.; Quek, L.-E.; Francis, D.; Fazakerley, D.J.; Elkington, S.D.; Diaz-Vegas, A.; Cooke, K.C.; Weiss, F.C.; Duan, X.; Kurdyukov, S.; et al. Lactate production is a prioritized feature of adipocyte metabolism. J. Biol. Chem. 2020, 295, 83–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  164. Lagarde, D.; Jeanson, Y.; Portais, J.-C.; Galinier, A.; Ader, I.; Casteilla, L.; Carrière, A. Lactate Fluxes and Plasticity of Adipose Tissues: A Redox Perspective. Front. Physiol. 2021, 12, 689747. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  165. Johnson, A.R.; Milner, J.J.; Makowski, L. The inflammation highway: Metabolism accelerates inflammatory traffic in obesity. Immunol. Rev. 2012, 249, 218–238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  166. Keane, M.P.; Strieter, R.M. Chemokine signaling in inflammation. Crit. Care Med. 2000, 28 (Suppl. 4), N13–N26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  167. Turner, M.D.; Nedjai, B.; Hurst, T.; Pennington, D.J. Cytokines and chemokines: At the crossroads of cell signalling and inflammatory disease. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2014, 1843, 2563–2582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  168. Manosalva, C.; Quiroga, J.; Hidalgo, A.I.; Alarcón, P.; Ansoleaga, N.; Hidalgo, M.A.; Burgos, R.A. Role of Lactate in Inflammatory Processes: Friend or Foe. Front. Immunol. 2021, 12, 808799. [Google Scholar]
  169. Medzhitov, R. Origin and physiological roles of inflammation. Nature 2008, 454, 428–435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  170. Zatterale, F.; Longo, M.; Naderi, J.; Raciti, G.A.; Desiderio, A.; Miele, C.; Beguinot, F. Chronic Adipose Tissue Inflammation Linking Obesity to Insulin Resistance and Type 2 Diabetes. Front. Physiol. 2020, 10, 1607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  171. Battula, V.L.; Chen, Y.; Cabreira, M.d.G.; Ruvolo, V.; Wang, Z.; Ma, W.; Konoplev, S.; Shpall, E.; Lyons, K.; Strunk, D.; et al. Connective tissue growth factor regulates adipocyte differentiation of mesenchymal stromal cells and facilitates leukemia bone marrow engraftment. Blood 2013, 122, 357–366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  172. Palacios-Ortega, S.; Varela-Guruceaga, M.; Algarabel, M.; Milagro, F.I.; Martínez, J.A.; de Miguel, C. Effect of TNF-Alpha on Caveolin-1 Expression and Insulin Signaling During Adipocyte Differentiation and in Mature Adipocytes. Cell. Physiol. Biochem. 2015, 36, 1499–1516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  173. Ikeda, D.; Sakaue, S.; Kamigaki, M.; Ohira, H.; Itoh, N.; Ohtsuka, Y.; Tsujino, I.; Nishimura, M. Knockdown of Macrophage Migration Inhibitory Factor Disrupts Adipogenesis in 3T3-L1 Cells. Endocrinology 2008, 149, 6037–6042. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  174. Ito, A.; Suganami, T.; Miyamoto, Y.; Yoshimasa, Y.; Takeya, M.; Kamei, Y.; Ogawa, Y. Role of MAPK Phosphatase-1 in the induction of monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 during the course of adipocyte hypertrophy. J. Biol. Chem. 2007, 282, 25445–25452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  175. Takeshita, S.; Fumoto, T.; Naoe, Y.; Ikeda, K. Age-related marrow adipogenesis is linked to increased expression of rankl. J. Biol. Chem. 2014, 289, 16699–16710. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  176. Steppan, C.M.; Bailey, S.T.; Bhat, S.; Brown, E.J.; Banerjee, R.R.; Wright, C.M.; Patel, H.R.; Ahima, R.S.; Lazar, M.A. The hormone resistin links obesity to diabetes. Nature 2001, 409, 307–312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  177. Kabir, S.M.; Lee, E.S.; Son, D.S. Chemokine network during adipogenesis in 3T3-L1 cells: Differential response between growth and proinflammatory factor in preadipocytes vs. adipocytes. Adipocyte 2014, 3, 97–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  178. Liu, L.-F.; Shen, W.-J.; Ueno, M.; Patel, S.; Kraemer, F.B. Characterization of age-related gene expression profiling in bone marrow and epididymal adipocytes. BMC Genom. 2011, 12, 212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  179. Gasparrini, M.; Rivas, D.; Elbaz, A.; Duque, G. Differential expression of cytokines in subcutaneous and marrow fat of aging C57BL/6J mice. Exp. Gerontol. 2009, 44, 613–618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  180. Luo, L.; Liu, M. Adipose tissue in control of metabolism. J. Endocrinol. 2016, 231, R77–R99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  181. Morigny, P.; Boucher, J.; Arner, P.; Langin, D. Lipid and glucose metabolism in white adipocytes: Pathways, dysfunction and therapeutics. Nat. Rev. Endocrinol. 2021, 17, 276–295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  182. Thompson, B.R.; Lobo, S.; Bernlohr, D.A. Fatty acid flux in adipocytes: The in’s and out’s of fat cell lipid trafficking. Mol. Cell. Endocrinol. 2010, 318, 24–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  183. Brasaemle, D.L. Thematic review series: Adipocyte Biology. The perilipin family of structural lipid droplet proteins: Stabilization of lipid droplets and control of lipolysis. J. Lipid Res. 2007, 48, 2547–2559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  184. Wolins, N.E.; Brasaemle, D.L.; Bickel, P.E. A proposed model of fat packaging by exchangeable lipid droplet proteins. FEBS Lett. 2006, 580, 5484–5491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  185. Martin, S.; Parton, R.G. Lipid droplets: A unified view of a dynamic organelle. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2006, 7, 373–378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  186. Sztalryd, C.; Brasaemle, D.L. The perilipin family of lipid droplet proteins: Gatekeepers of intracellular lipolysis. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Mol. Cell Biol. Lipids 2017, 1862, 1221–1232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  187. Bolsoni-Lopes, A.; Alonso-Vale, M.I.C. Lipolysis and lipases in white adipose tissue—An update. Arq. Bras. Endocrinol. Metabol. 2015, 59, 335–342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  188. Tansey, J.T.; Sztalryd, C.; Gruia-Gray, J.; Roush, D.L.; Zee, J.V.; Gavrilova, O.; Reitman, M.L.; Deng, C.X.; Li, C.; Kimmel, A.R.; et al. Perilipin ablation results in a lean mouse with aberrant adipocyte lipolysis, enhanced leptin production, and resistance to diet-induced obesity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2001, 98, 6494–6499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  189. Gandotra, S.; Le Dour, C.; Bottomley, W.; Cervera, P.; Giral, P.; Reznik, Y.; Charpentier, G.; Auclair, M.; Delépin, M.; Barroso, I.; et al. Perilipin deficiency and autosomal dominant partial lipodystrophy. N. Engl. J. Med. 2011, 364, 740–748. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  190. Lee, M.K.; Al-Sharea, A.; Dragoljevic, D.; Murphy, A.J. Hand of FATe: Lipid metabolism in hematopoietic stem cells. Curr. Opin. Infect. Dis. 2018, 29, 240–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  191. Lemus-Conejo, A.; Medrano, M.; Lopez, S.; Millan-Linares, M.C.; Rosillo, M.A.; Perez-Simon, J.A.; Muriana, F.J.G.; Abia, R. MUFAs in High-Fat Diets Protect against Obesity-Induced Bias of Hematopoietic Cell Lineages. Mol. Nutr. Food Res. 2021, 65, 2001203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  192. Lee, Y.J.; Shin, K.J.; Park, S.-A.; Park, K.S.; Park, S.; Heo, K.; Seo, Y.-K.; Noh, D.-Y.; Ryu, S.H.; Suh, P.-G. G-protein-coupled receptor 81 promotes a malignant phenotype in breast cancer through angiogenic factor secretion. Oncotarget 2016, 7, 70898–70911. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  193. Ranganathan, P.; Shanmugam, A.; Swafford, D.; Suryawanshi, A.; Bhattacharjee, P.; Hussein, M.S.; Koni, P.A.; Prasad, P.D.; Kurago, Z.B.; Thangaraju, M.; et al. GPR81, a Cell-Surface Receptor for Lactate, Regulates Intestinal Homeostasis and Protects Mice from Experimental Colitis. J. Immunol. 2018, 200, 1781–1789. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  194. Lee, Y.-S.; Kim, T.-Y.; Kim, Y.; Kim, S.; Lee, S.-H.; Seo, S.-U.; Zhou, B.O.; Eunju, O.; Kim, K.S.; Kweon, M.-N. Microbiota-derived lactate promotes hematopoiesis and erythropoiesis by inducing stem cell factor production from leptin receptor+ niche cells. Exp. Mol. Med. 2021, 53, 1319–1331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  195. Manoharan, I.; Prasad, P.D.; Thangaraju, M.; Manicassamy, S. Lactate-Dependent Regulation of Immune Responses by Dendritic Cells and Macrophages. Front. Immunol. 2021, 12, 691134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  196. Kumari, A.; Ludin, A.; Golan, K.; Kollet, O.; Niemeyer, E.; Friedlander, N.; Lapidot, T. PGE2 Promotes BM Hematopoietic Stem Cell Retention Via Stromal Lactate Production, cAMP and CXCL12/CXCR4 Regulation. Blood 2014, 124, 771. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  197. Tanner, L.B.; Goglia, A.G.; Wei, M.H.; Sehgal, T.; Parsons, L.R.; Park, J.O.; White, E.; Toettcher, J.E.; Rabinowitz, J.D. Four Key Steps Control Glycolytic Flux in Mammalian Cells. Cell Syst. 2018, 7, 49–62.e8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  198. Suchacki, K.J.; Tavares, A.A.S.; Mattiucci, D.; Scheller, E.L.; Papanastasiou, G.; Gray, C.; Sinton, M.C.; Ramage, L.E.; McDougald, W.A.; Lovdel, A.; et al. Bone marrow adipose tissue is a unique adipose subtype with distinct roles in glucose homeostasis. Nat. Commun. 2020, 11, 3097. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  199. DiMascio, L.; Voermans, C.; Uqoezwa, M.; Duncan, A.; Lu, D.; Wu, J.; Sankar, U.; Reya, T. Identification of adiponectin as a novel hemopoietic stem cell growth factor. J. Immunol. 2007, 178, 3511–3520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  200. Masamoto, Y.; Arai, S.; Sato, T.; Kubota, N.; Takamoto, I.; Kadowaki, T.; Kurokawa, M. Adiponectin Enhances Quiescence Exit of Murine Hematopoietic Stem Cells and Hematopoietic Recovery Through mTORC1 Potentiation. Stem Cells 2017, 35, 1835–1848. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  201. Masamoto, Y.; Arai, S.; Sato, T.; Yoshimi, A.; Kubota, N.; Takamoto, I.; Iwakura, Y.; Yoshimura, A.; Kadowaki, T.; Kurokawa, M. Adiponectin Enhances Antibacterial Activity of Hematopoietic Cells by Suppressing Bone Marrow Inflammation. Immunity 2016, 44, 1422–1433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  202. Trinh, T.; Broxmeyer, H.E. Role for Leptin and Leptin Receptors in Stem Cells During Health and Diseases. Stem Cell Rev. Rep. 2021, 17, 511–522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  203. Umemoto, Y.; Tsuji, K.; Yang, F.-C.; Ebihara, Y.; Kaneko, A.; Furukawa, S.; Nakahata, T. Leptin stimulates the proliferation of murine myelocytic and primitive hematopoietic progenitor cells. Blood 1997, 90, 3438–3443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  204. Laharrague, P.; Oppert, J.-M.; Brousset, P.; Charlet, J.-P.; Campfield, A.; Fontanilles, A.-M.; Guy-Grand, B.; Corberand, J.; Pénicaud, L.; Casteilla, L. High concentration of leptin stimulates myeloid differentiation from human bone marrow CD34+ progenitors: Potential involvement in leukocytosis of obese subjects. Int. J. Obes. 2000, 24, 1212–1216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  205. Faggioni, R.; Jones-Carson, J.; Reed, D.A.; Dinarello, C.A.; Feingold, K.R.; Grunfeld, C.; Fantuzzi, G. Leptin-deficient (ob/ob) mice are protected from T cell-mediated hepatotoxicity: Role of tumor necrosis factor α and IL-18. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2000, 97, 2367–2372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  206. Bennett, B.D.; Solar, G.P.; Yuan, J.Q.; Mathias, J.; Thomas, G.; Matthews, W. A role for leptin and its cognate receptor in hematopoiesis. Curr. Biol. 1996, 6, 1170–1180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  207. Claycombe, K.; King, L.E.; Fraker, P.J. A role for leptin in sustaining lymphopoiesis and myelopoiesis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2008, 105, 2017–2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  208. Pietramaggiori, G.; Scherer, S.S.; Alperovich, M.; Chen, B.; Orgill, D.P.; Wagers, A.J. Improved Cutaneous Healing in Diabetic Mice Exposed to Healthy Peripheral Circulation. J. Investig. Dermatol. 2009, 129, 2265–2274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  209. Pietras, E.M. Inflammation: A key regulator of hematopoietic stem cell fate in health and disease. Blood 2017, 130, 1693–1698. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  210. Mirantes, C.; Passegué, E.; Pietras, E.M. Pro-inflammatory cytokines: Emerging players regulating HSC function in normal and diseased hematopoiesis. Exp. Cell Res. 2014, 329, 248–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  211. Gschwandtner, M.; Derler, R.; Midwood, K.S. More Than Just Attractive: How CCL2 Influences Myeloid Cell Behavior Beyond Chemotaxis. Front. Immunol. 2019, 10, 2759. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  212. Si, Y.; Tsou, C.-L.; Croft, K.; Charo, I.F. CCR2 mediates hematopoietic stem and progenitor cell trafficking to sites of inflammation in mice. J. Clin. Investig. 2010, 120, 1192–1203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  213. Kim, C.H.; Hangoc, G.; Cooper, S.; Helgason, C.D.; Yew, S.; Humphries, R.K.; Krystal, G.; Broxmeyer, H.E. Altered responsiveness to chemokines due to targeted disruption of SHIP. J. Clin. Investig. 1999, 104, 1751–1759. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  214. Broxmeyer, H.E.; Sherry, B.; Cooper, S.; Lu, L.; Maze, R.; Beckmann, M.P.; Cerami, A.; Ralph, P. Comparative analysis of the human macrophage inflammatory protein family of cytokines (chemokines) on proliferation of human myeloid progenitor cells. Interacting effects involving suppression, synergistic suppression, and blocking of suppression. J. Immunol. 1993, 150, 3448–3458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  215. Reid, S.; Ritchie, A.; Boring, L.; Gosling, J.; Cooper, S.; Hangoc, G.; Charo, I.F.; Broxmeyer, H.E. Enhanced myeloid progenitor cell cycling and apoptosis in mice lacking the chemokine receptor, CCR2. Blood 1999, 93, 1524–1533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  216. Roche, J.K.; Keepers, T.R.; Gross, L.K.; Seaner, R.M.; Obrig, T.G. CXCL1/KC and CXCL2/MIP-2 are critical effectors and potential targets for therapy of escherichia coli o157:h7-associated renal inflammation. Am. J. Pathol. 2007, 170, 526–537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  217. Pelus, L.M.; Horowitz, D.; Cooper, S.C.; King, A.G. Peripheral blood stem cell mobilization. A role for CXC chemokines. Crit. Rev. Oncol. Hematol. 2002, 43, 257–275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  218. Broxmeyer, H.E.; Cooper, S.; Cacalano, G.; Hague, N.L.; Bailish, E.; Moore, M.W. Involvement of Interleukin (IL) 8 receptor in negative regulation of myeloid progenitor cells in vivo: Evidence from mice lacking the murine IL-8 receptor homologue. J. Exp. Med. 1996, 184, 1825–1832. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  219. Sinclair, A.; Park, L.; Shah, M.; Drotar, M.; Calaminus, S.; Hopcroft, L.E.M.; Kinstrie, R.; Guitart, A.V.; Dunn, K.; Abraham, S.A.; et al. CXCR2 and CXCL4 regulate survival and self-renewal of hematopoietic stem/progenitor cells. Blood 2016, 128, 371–383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  220. Murphy, P.M.; Baggiolini, M.; Charo, I.F.; Hébert, C.A.; Horuk, R.; Matsushima, K.; Miller, L.H.; Oppenheim, J.J.; Power, C.A. International union of pharmacology. XXII. Nomenclature for chemokine receptors. Pharmacol. Rev. 2000, 52, 145–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  221. Jules, J.; Ashley, J.W.; Feng, X. Selective targeting of RANK signaling pathways as new therapeutic strategies for osteoporosis. Expert Opin. Ther. Targets 2010, 14, 923–934. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  222. Miyamoto, K.; Yoshida, S.; Kawasumi, M.; Hashimoto, K.; Kimura, T.; Sato, Y.; Kobayashi, T.; Miyauchi, Y.; Hoshi, H.; Iwasaki, R.; et al. Osteoclasts are dispensable for hematopoietic stem cell maintenance and mobilization. J. Exp. Med. 2011, 208, 2175–2181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  223. Dougall, W.C.; Glaccum, M.; Charrier, K.; Rohrbach, K.; Brasel, K.; De Smedt, T.; Daro, E.; Smith, J.; Tometsko, M.E.; Maliszewski, C.R.; et al. RANK is essential for osteoclast and lymph node development. Genes Dev. 1999, 13, 2412–2424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  224. Kong, Y.-Y.; Yoshida, H.; Sarosi, I.; Tan, H.-L.; Timms, E.; Capparelli, C.; Morony, S.; Oliveira-Dos-Santos, A.J.; Van, G.; Itie, A.; et al. OPGL is a key regulator of osteoclastogenesis, lymphocyte development and lymph-node organogenesis. Nature 1999, 397, 315–323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  225. O’leary, H.; Ou, X.; Broxmeyer, H.E. The role of dipeptidyl peptidase 4 in hematopoiesis and transplantation. Curr. Opin. Hematol. 2013, 20, 314–319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  226. Khurana, S.; Margamuljana, L.; Joseph, C.; Schouteden, S.; Buckley, S.M.; Verfaillie, C.M. Glypican-3–mediated inhibition of CD26 by TFPI: A novel mechanism in hematopoietic stem cell homing and maintenance. Blood 2013, 121, 2587–2595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  227. Viviano, B.L.; Silverstein, L.; Pflederer, C.; Paine-Saunders, S.; Mills, K.; Saunders, S. Altered hematopoiesis in glypican-3-deficient mice results in decreased osteoclast differentiation and a delay in endochondral ossification. Dev. Biol. 2005, 282, 152–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  228. Li, Y.; Yang, Q.; Cai, D.; Guo, H.; Fang, J.; Cui, H.; Gou, L.; Deng, J.; Wang, Z.; Zuo, Z. Resistin, a Novel Host Defense Peptide of Innate Immunity. Front. Immunol. 2021, 12, 699807. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  229. Wang, F.; Gao, J.; Malisani, A.; Xi, X.; Han, W.; Wan, X. Mouse Resistin (mRetn): Cloning, expression and purification in Escherichia coli and the potential regulative effects on murine bone marrow hematopoiesis. BMC Biotechnol. 2015, 15, 105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  230. Fahey, E.; Doyle, S.L. IL-1 Family cytokine regulation of vascular permeability and angiogenesis. Front. Immunol. 2019, 10, 1426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  231. Ghosh, A.; Gao, L.; Thakur, A.; Siu, P.M.; Lai, C.W.K. Role of free fatty acids in endothelial dysfunction. J. Biomed. Sci. 2017, 24, 50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  232. Jamaluddin, M.S.; Yan, S.; Lü, J.; Liang, Z.; Yao, Q.; Chen, C. Resistin increases monolayer permeability of human coronary artery endothelial cells. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e84576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  233. Khatib-Massalha, E.; Bhattacharya, S.; Massalha, H.; Biram, A.; Golan, K.; Kollet, O.; Kumari, A.; Avemaria, F.; Petrovich-Kopitman, E.; Gur-Cohen, S.; et al. Lactate released by inflammatory bone marrow neutrophils induces their mobilization via endothelial GPR81 signaling. Nat. Commun. 2020, 11, 3547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  234. Zhang, L.; Gui, X.; Zhang, X.; Dai, Y.; Wang, X.; Tong, X.; Li, S. Endothelial cell: Lactate metabolic player in organ regeneration. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 2021, 9, 701672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  235. Krewson, E.A.; Sanderlin, E.J.; Marie, M.A.; Akhtar, S.N.; Velcicky, J.; Loetscher, P.; Yang, L.V. The proton-sensing GPR4 receptor regulates paracellular gap formation and permeability of vascular endothelial cells. iScience 2020, 23, 100848. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  236. Calabrò, P.; Cirillo, P.; Limongelli, G.; Maddaloni, V.; Riegler, L.; Palmieri, R.; Pacileo, G.; De Rosa, S.; Pacileo, M.; De Palma, R.; et al. Tissue factor is induced by resistin in human coronary artery endothelial cells by the NF-ĸB-dependent pathway. J. Vasc. Res. 2010, 48, 59–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  237. Chen, C.; Jiang, J.; Lü, J.-M.; Chai, H.; Wang, X.; Lin, P.H.; Yao, Q. Resistin decreases expression of endothelial nitric oxide synthase through oxidative stress in human coronary artery endothelial cells. Am. J. Physiol. Circ. Physiol. 2010, 299, H193–H201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  238. Cao, F.; Wu, K.; Zhu, Y.-Z.; Bao, Z.-W. Roles and Mechanisms of Dipeptidyl Peptidase 4 Inhibitors in Vascular Aging. Front. Endocrinol. 2021, 12, 731273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  239. Korns, D.; Frasch, S.C.; Fernandez-Boyanapalli, R.; Henson, P.M.; Bratton, D.L. Modulation of macrophage efferocytosis in inflammation. Front. Immunol. 2011, 2, 57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  240. Fu, X.-L.; Duan, W.; Su, C.-Y.; Mao, F.-Y.; Lv, Y.-P.; Teng, Y.-S.; Yu, P.-W.; Zhuang, Y.; Zhao, Y.-L. Interleukin 6 induces M2 macrophage differentiation by STAT3 activation that correlates with gastric cancer progression. Cancer Immunol. Immunother. 2017, 66, 1597–1608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  241. Fernando, M.R.; Reyes, J.L.; Iannuzzi, J.; Leung, G.; McKay, D.M. The pro-inflammatory cytokine, interleukin-6, enhances the polarization of alternatively activated macrophages. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e94188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  242. Kiernan, K.; MacIver, N.J. The role of the adipokine leptin in immune cell function in health and disease. Front. Immunol. 2021, 11, 622468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  243. Amarilyo, G.; Iikuni, N.; Liu, A.; Matarese, G.; La Cava, A. Leptin enhances availability of apoptotic cell-derived self-antigen in systemic lupus erythematosus. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e112826. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  244. Di Mitri, D.; Vasilevska, J.; Calcinotto, A.; Gil, V.; Boysen, G.; Revandkar, A.; Waugh, D.; Barry, S.; de Bono, J.; Alimonti, A. Re-education of tumor-associated macrophages by CXCR2 blockade drives senescence and tumor inhibition in advanced prostate cancer. Ann. Oncol. 2017, 28, v272–v273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  245. Mota, R.F.; de Araújo, P.H.C.; Cezine, M.E.R.; Matsuo, F.S.; Metzner, R.J.M.; Junior, C.A.O.d.B.; Peronni, K.C.; Hayashi, H.; Shimamura, M.; Nakagami, H.; et al. RANKL impairs the TLR4 pathway by increasing TRAF6 and RANK interaction in macrophages. BioMed Res. Int. 2022, 2022, 7740079. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  246. De Nigris, V.; Prattichizzo, F.; Iijima, H.; Ceriello, A. DPP-4 inhibitors have different effects on endothelial low-grade inflammation and on the M1-M2 macrophage polarization under hyperglycemic conditions. Diabetes Metab. Syndr. Obes. 2021, 14, 1519–1531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  247. Zhuge, F.; Ni, Y.; Nagashimada, M.; Nagata, N.; Xu, L.; Mukaida, N.; Kanekom, S.; Ota, T. DPP-4 inhibition by linagliptin attenuates obesity-related inflammation and insulin resistance by regulating M1/M2 macrophage polarization. Diabetes 2016, 65, 2966–2979. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  248. Batista-Gonzalez, A.; Vidal, R.; Criollo, A.; Carreño, L.J. New insights on the role of lipid metabolism in the metabolic reprogramming of macrophages. Front. Immunol. 2020, 10, 2993. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  249. Silswal, N.; Singh, A.K.; Aruna, B.; Mukhopadhyay, S.; Ghosh, S.; Ehtesham, N.Z. Human resistin stimulates the pro-inflammatory cytokines TNF-α and IL-12 in macrophages by NF-κB-dependent pathway. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2005, 334, 1092–1101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  250. Lee, S.; Lee, H.C.; Kwon, Y.W.; Lee, S.E.; Cho, Y.; Kim, J.; Lee, J.; Yang, H.-M.; Mook-Jung, I.; Nam, K.-Y. Adenylyl cyclase-associated protein 1 is a receptor for human resistin and mediates inflammatory actions of human monocytes. Cell Metab. 2014, 19, 484–497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  251. Nagaev, I.; Bokarewa, M.; Tarkowski, A.; Smith, U. Human resistin is a systemic immune-derived proinflammatory cytokine targeting both leukocytes and adipocytes. PLoS ONE 2006, 1, e31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Cell types and their molecular interactions in the bone marrow (BM) niche. The BM niche comprises several cellular components, including vascular (arteriolar endothelial cells—AECs, sinusoidal endothelial cells—SECs), neural (sympathetic nerve fibers, Schwann cells), stromal (Nestinbright NG2+ perivascular cells, Nestindim LepR+ perisinusoidal cells, CXCL12-abundant reticular cells—CAR cells, osteoblasts, adipocytes—BMAds), and hematopoietic cells (hematopoietic stem cells—HSCs, megakaryocytes, macrophages—MΦ, regulatory T cells—Tregs). The figure shows critical niche-supportive signaling pathways, such as CXCL12, SCF, angiopoietin-1 (ANGPT1), osteopontin (OPN), thrombopoietin (THPO), transforming growth factor-beta 1 (TGF-β1), CXCL4, noradrenaline, and reactive oxygen species (ROS), regulating HSC maintenance, quiescence, differentiation, mobilization, and aging. BM adipocytes (BMAds) specifically modulate niche function through secreted adipokines and cytokines, significantly contributing to age-related BM niche alterations.
Figure 1. Cell types and their molecular interactions in the bone marrow (BM) niche. The BM niche comprises several cellular components, including vascular (arteriolar endothelial cells—AECs, sinusoidal endothelial cells—SECs), neural (sympathetic nerve fibers, Schwann cells), stromal (Nestinbright NG2+ perivascular cells, Nestindim LepR+ perisinusoidal cells, CXCL12-abundant reticular cells—CAR cells, osteoblasts, adipocytes—BMAds), and hematopoietic cells (hematopoietic stem cells—HSCs, megakaryocytes, macrophages—MΦ, regulatory T cells—Tregs). The figure shows critical niche-supportive signaling pathways, such as CXCL12, SCF, angiopoietin-1 (ANGPT1), osteopontin (OPN), thrombopoietin (THPO), transforming growth factor-beta 1 (TGF-β1), CXCL4, noradrenaline, and reactive oxygen species (ROS), regulating HSC maintenance, quiescence, differentiation, mobilization, and aging. BM adipocytes (BMAds) specifically modulate niche function through secreted adipokines and cytokines, significantly contributing to age-related BM niche alterations.
Cells 14 00814 g001
Figure 2. Impact of aged bone marrow adipocytes (BMAds) on the hematopoietic niche. Increased adiposity in the aging bone marrow negatively influences niche integrity and functionality, characterized by reduced secretion of essential niche-supporting factors (CXCL12, SCF, ANGPT1) from stromal cells and increased vascular permeability. Altered secretion profiles from aged BMAds directly affect hematopoietic stem cells (HSC), hematopoietic progenitor cells (HPC), and immune cell populations, causing disrupted hematopoiesis. Specific adipokines and secreted factors involved include decreased RANKL, IL-6, MCP-1, CXCL2, adiponectin, and leptin, alongside increased secretion of dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP4), saturated fatty acids (SFAs), and potentially lactate. Additionally, aged BMAds promote a pro-inflammatory M1 macrophage phenotype, further exacerbating inflammation-driven myeloid skewing of HSC differentiation and reducing lymphopoiesis, thus significantly contributing to hematopoietic dysfunction associated with aging.
Figure 2. Impact of aged bone marrow adipocytes (BMAds) on the hematopoietic niche. Increased adiposity in the aging bone marrow negatively influences niche integrity and functionality, characterized by reduced secretion of essential niche-supporting factors (CXCL12, SCF, ANGPT1) from stromal cells and increased vascular permeability. Altered secretion profiles from aged BMAds directly affect hematopoietic stem cells (HSC), hematopoietic progenitor cells (HPC), and immune cell populations, causing disrupted hematopoiesis. Specific adipokines and secreted factors involved include decreased RANKL, IL-6, MCP-1, CXCL2, adiponectin, and leptin, alongside increased secretion of dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP4), saturated fatty acids (SFAs), and potentially lactate. Additionally, aged BMAds promote a pro-inflammatory M1 macrophage phenotype, further exacerbating inflammation-driven myeloid skewing of HSC differentiation and reducing lymphopoiesis, thus significantly contributing to hematopoietic dysfunction associated with aging.
Cells 14 00814 g002
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Švajger, U.; Milić, P.; Rožman, P.J. Bone Marrow Niche Aging: Are Adipocytes Detrimental Cells in the Bone Marrow? Cells 2025, 14, 814. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells14110814

AMA Style

Švajger U, Milić P, Rožman PJ. Bone Marrow Niche Aging: Are Adipocytes Detrimental Cells in the Bone Marrow? Cells. 2025; 14(11):814. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells14110814

Chicago/Turabian Style

Švajger, Urban, Patrik Milić, and Primož J. Rožman. 2025. "Bone Marrow Niche Aging: Are Adipocytes Detrimental Cells in the Bone Marrow?" Cells 14, no. 11: 814. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells14110814

APA Style

Švajger, U., Milić, P., & Rožman, P. J. (2025). Bone Marrow Niche Aging: Are Adipocytes Detrimental Cells in the Bone Marrow? Cells, 14(11), 814. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells14110814

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop