Next Article in Journal
The Material Properties of the Cell Nucleus: A Matter of Scale
Previous Article in Journal
Intermediate Molecular Phenotypes to Identify Genetic Markers of Anthracycline-Induced Cardiotoxicity Risk
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Cells
Volume 12
Issue 15
10.3390/cells12151957
cells-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

MicroRNAs Regulate Ca2+ Homeostasis in Murine Embryonic Stem Cells

by
Kimberley M. Reid
1,
Juan Miguel Sanchez-Nieto
2,
Sandra Terrasse
1,
Danilo Faccenda
3,4,
Barbara Pernaute
2,
Michelangelo Campanella
4,5,6,7,
Tristan A. Rodriguez
2,† and
Bradley S. Cobb
1,*,†
1
Department of Comparative Biomedical Sciences, Royal Veterinary College, University of London, 4 Royal College Street, London NW1 0TU, UK
2
National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Hospital Campus, Du Cane Road, London W12 0NN, UK
3
Department of Clinical, Pharmaceutical and Biological Sciences, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield AL10 9AB, UK
4
Centre for Clinical Pharmacology and Precision Medicine, William Harvey Research Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London E1 4NS, UK
5
University College London Consortium for Mitochondrial Research, London WC1E 6BT, UK
6
Institute Gustave Roussy, 94800 Villejuif, France
7
Department of Biomedical Sciences, University of Padua, 35122 Padua, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Cells 2023, 12(15), 1957; https://doi.org/10.3390/cells12151957
Submission received: 4 July 2023 / Revised: 23 July 2023 / Accepted: 24 July 2023 / Published: 28 July 2023
(This article belongs to the Topic MicroRNA: Mechanisms of Action, Physio-Pathological Implications, and Disease Biomarkers, 2nd Volume)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are important regulators of embryonic stem cell (ESC) biology, and their study has identified key regulatory mechanisms. To find novel pathways regulated by miRNAs in ESCs, we undertook a bioinformatics analysis of gene pathways differently expressed in the absence of miRNAs due to the deletion of Dicer, which encodes an RNase that is essential for the synthesis of miRNAs. One pathway that stood out was Ca2+ signaling. Interestingly, we found that Dicer−/− ESCs had no difference in basal cytoplasmic Ca2+ levels but were hyperresponsive when Ca2+ import into the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) was blocked by thapsigargin. Remarkably, the increased Ca2+ response to thapsigargin in ESCs resulted in almost no increase in apoptosis and no differences in stress response pathways, despite the importance of miRNAs in the stress response of other cell types. The increased Ca2+ response in Dicer−/− ESCs was also observed during purinergic receptor activation, demonstrating a physiological role for the miRNA regulation of Ca2+ signaling pathways. In examining the mechanism of increased Ca2+ responsiveness to thapsigargin, neither store-operated Ca2+ entry nor Ca2+ clearance mechanisms from the cytoplasm appeared to be involved. Rather, it appeared to involve an increase in the expression of one isoform of the IP3 receptors (Itpr2). miRNA regulation of Itpr2 expression primarily appeared to be indirect, with transcriptional regulation playing a major role. Therefore, the miRNA regulation of Itpr2 expression offers a unique mechanism to regulate Ca2+ signaling pathways in the physiology of pluripotent stem cells.

1. Introduction

miRNAs play critical roles throughout mammalian development. These small RNAs of approximately 22 nucleotides regulate gene expression post-transcriptionally by targeting sequences in mRNAs and facilitating translation inhibition and message destabilization [1]. miRNAs are encoded within the genome as a part of larger transcripts, which are processed to maturity by protein complexes containing the essential RNases Drosha and Dicer [2]. The loss of miRNA synthesis in the early embryo through a genetic knockout of Dicer results in patterning defects in addition to lethality due to a massive apoptosis of embryonic cells at the post-implantation stage [3,4]. Therefore, an important question is how miRNAs function in regulating the physiology and developmental programs of the early embryo. Embryonic cell lines have provided an important means to study the mechanisms of miRNA function in early development. Their ability to differentiate into all cell types of the body has generated significant interest in understanding the mechanisms that control their pluripotency and overall physiology. Of these, embryonic stem cells (ESCs) are the most studied, and many functions have been found for miRNAs in regulating their biology.
Murine ESCs can survive in the absence of miRNAs but have a slower growth rate than control cells [5]. Interestingly, they are unable to exit the pluripotent state and differentiate [6], and much is known about the miRNA mechanisms regulating the expression of pluripotency transcription factors and ESC differentiation [7,8,9,10,11]. miRNAs also regulate other aspects of ESC biology. miRNAs of the miR-290/302 family (the most abundant miRNA family in ESCs) suppress cell cycle inhibitors and facilitate the shortened cell cycle that occurs in ESCs [12]. These miRNAs also regulate metabolism towards aerobic glycolysis, which is essential for ESC growth and pluripotency [13]. Additionally, miRNAs have been implicated in regulating the stress response [14] and the bivalent epigenetic regulation of developmental genes, which is specific to stem cells and in which chromatin within these genes contains both repressive and active modifications [15]. Therefore, miRNAs are key regulators of multiple functions in ESCs, and studying their roles has led to a greater understanding of the regulatory pathways involved in ESC physiology.
We wished to further examine miRNA function in ESCs and discover additional regulatory mechanisms in ESC physiology. Therefore, we undertook a bioinformatic analysis of genes differentially expressed in Dicer−/− ESCs to identify novel pathways regulated by miRNAs. One group of genes that stood out in this analysis was those involved in regulating Ca2+ signaling. Regulating Ca2+ levels plays a central role in the physiology and survival of cells [16]. In addition, Ca2+ signaling through calcineurin and NFAT is important for the differentiation of ESCs [17], and it plays an essential role in the early development of vertebrate embryos [18]. Furthermore, there is a developing body of literature suggesting that miRNAs can regulate the expression of genes involved in Ca2+ transport [19]. Therefore, we undertook an analysis of miRNA regulation of Ca2+ homeostasis in ESCs.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Cell Lines and Maintenance

Dicerfl/fl ESCs containing the Cre-ERT2 recombinase gene targeted to the Rosa26 locus [20] were maintained in GMEM (Invitrogen, Waltham, MA, USA) media supplemented with 10% v/v Fetal Calf Serum, 50 mM β-mercaptoethanol, 1% v/v NaPyr, 1% v/v NEAA, 1% v/v L-Glutamine, 1% v/v Pen/Strep, 1 mM PD0325901 (ERK inhibitor), 3 mM CHIR99021 (GSK inhibitor) (all Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA), and 1500 U LIF on gelatin-coated dishes. HEK293T cells were maintained in DMEM (Sigma), 10% v/v FCS, and 1% v/v Pen/Strep.

2.2. Microarray Analysis

For the microarray analysis, RNA from 3 independent experiments was extracted as described in “RNA extraction and qPCR”. Labeling and hybridization to Affimetrix Mouse Gene 1.0ST microarrays were performed at UCL Genomics at the Institute of Child Health. Normalization and statistical analysis were performed using Robust Multichip Average and then imported into Partek. Data can be accessed with the accession number GSE93725. The Babelomics data analysis platform [21] was used to analyze the predicted miRNA targeting those significantly up-regulated by a 1.2-fold change in Dicer−/− ESCs (p < 0.05). The bioinformatics platform DAVID [22] was used to obtain gene ontology terms from that gene list.

2.3. Fura-2 Live Cell Imaging

Cells grown in glass bottom dishes were washed in Hanks Buffered Saline Solution (HBSS) (137 mM NaCl, 5.4 mM KCl, 0.25 mM Na2HPO4, 5.6 mM Glucose, 0.44 mM KH2PO4, 1 mM MgSO4, 4.2 mM NaHCO3, and 1.3 mM CaCl2, pH 7.4) before incubating with 4 µM Fura-2, AM (Invitrogen, Waltham, MA, USA) in HBSS for 30 min in the dark, followed by 3 washes in HBSS. Image acquisition was carried out using a Nikon UV microscope and Andor1 software. Emission after excitation at 340 nm and 380 nm was recorded every second. Ratios were then calculated at every time point for at least 30 cells in the specified field.
Cytoplasmic Ca2+ levels were determined using the method of [23]. ECSs were loaded with Fura-2, AM in Ca2+-free HBSS with 1 mM EGTA. The basal fluorescence 340/380 nm emission ratio was measured followed by the addition of 3 mM Ca2+ and 1 mM ionomycin (final concentrations) to obtain the maximum fluorescence ratio (Rmax). Finally, 1 mM EGTA (final concentration) was added to obtain the minimum fluorescence ratio (Rmin). Ca2+ levels were calculated using the following equation: [Ca2+] nM = Ca2+ Kd × (R – Rmin)/(Rmax – R) × Sf2/Sb2, where Ca2+ Kd in the cytosol is 225 nM, Sf2 is the 380 emission value from the basal fluorescence measurement above, Sb2 is the 380 emission value from the maximum fluorescence measurement above, and R is the average of the 340/380 emission ratios from the cells under the designated condition in an individual experiment.

2.4. Annexin V Staining

Cells were washed in PBS then harvested by trypsinization and resuspended in an Annexin binding buffer containing APC conjugated Annexin V (Ebioscience, San Diego, CA, USA) plus propidium iodide. Cells were then analyzed by flow cytometry, and percentages of positive cells were calculated using Flowjo software.

2.5. Western Blotting

Western blots were performed following standard procedures using whole-cell extracts. The Dicer antibody was from Santa Cruz, SERCA1 was from Thermo Fisher (Waltham, MA, USA), Itpr1 was from AbCam (Cambridge, UK), Itpr2 was from Novagen (Pretoria, South Africa), Itpr3 was from Merk (Rahway, NJ, USA), and β-Actin was from Sigma (St. Louis, MO, USA). All other antibodies were from Cell Signaling (Danvers, MA, USA).

2.6. RNA Extraction and qPCR

For mRNA, total RNA was isolated using an Rneasy kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). cDNA was synthesized using SuperScript V reverse transcriptase (Invitrogen), and qPCR was performed with SYBRgreen PCR master mix (BioRad, Hercules, CA, USA) using GAPDH for normalization. For miRNA, total RNA including miRNAs was isolated using a miRNeasy kit (Qiagen). cDNA was synthesized using a miRCURY LNA Universal RT microRNA cDNA synthesis kit (Exiqon, Hovedstaden, Denmark), and qPCR was performed with the miRCURY LNA Universal RT microRNA qPCR kit, using U5 RNA for normalization.

2.7. Plasmids and Transfection

Sequences encoding the Atp2a1, Itpr1,2, and 3 3′UTRs were amplified from genomic DNA and cloned into the pGL3 SV40 control luciferase reporter (Promega, Madison, WI, USA). Primer sequences are available upon request. Plasmids were transfected into HEK293T using standard Ca2PO4 methodology and into ESCs using Lipofectamine 2000 (Invitrogen). Luciferase assays were performed using the Dual Luciferase™ reporter assay system (Promega) per the manufacturer’s instructions. miRNA mimics (MirVana from Thermo Fisher) were transfected into HEK293T cells as above and into ESCs using Lipofectamine RNAi max (Invitrogen).

2.8. Statistical Analysis

Statistical analysis of data was performed using Graphpad Prism (Graphpad Software, version 9, San Diego, CA, USA). Differences in Ca2+ levels and protein expression were analyzed using a two-way ANOVA. Analysis of Annexin V time-course experiments, where multiple wells from two experimental groups were treated and analyzed at set times, was carried out using a non-repeated-measures two-way ANOVA, followed by the Fisher’s exact Least Significant difference posthoc test. When analyzing relative data such as qPCR and luciferase assay, where control cells had a value of 1, a Wilcoxon Signed Rank test was performed. All data were plotted as the mean value with error bars displaying SEM. For all cases, p-values of less than 0.05 were accepted as significant.

3. Results

3.1. The Deletion of Dicer in ESCs Results in the Upregulation of Genes Involved in Ca2+ Signaling

To examine the roles of miRNAs in ESCs, we utilized a system previously optimized by us to study miRNA function in stem cell lines in which the deletion of Dicer could be induced to prevent miRNA synthesis [24]. This system was advantageous in that it allowed for the examination of the immediate effects of the loss of miRNAs and avoided any complications from secondary changes that could occur during the isolation of stable cell lines lacking Dicer. The deletion of Dicer was accomplished using ESCs containing floxed alleles of Dicer and a Cre-ERT2 fusion gene knocked into the ubiquitously expressed Rosa26 locus [20]. The constitutively expressed Cre-ERT could be activated in these cells to delete Dicer by the addition of tamoxifen. Optimal conditions for the deletion of Dicer mRNA and protein and the loss of miRNAs were established in ESCs by treatment with varying concentrations of tamoxifen. After three days of treatment, 0.5 mM tamoxifen produced an approximately 20-fold loss of Dicer mRNA and protein and a significant reduction in selected miRNAs that are highly expressed in ESCs and the pre-implantation embryo [24] (Figure 1A,B). Tamoxifen was then removed to avoid any possible toxicity complications and the cells were cultured for two or three additional days. At these times, several miRNAs of the miR-290/302 family, which is the most abundantly expressed miRNA family in ESCs, remained significantly depleted, as well as miR-19a and 19b, which are also abundantly expressed in ESCs and the early embryo [24,25] (Figure 1C). Therefore, any cells that had escaped Dicer deletion that could have a selective growth advantage [6] did not overgrow the population during the timeframe of our analysis.
To further validate the loss of miRNA function in this system, we examined the expression by qPCR of Rbl2, Lats2, and Cdk1a, whose miRNA regulation was previously shown to be important in the differentiation and cell cycle regulation of ESCs [7,8,12]. These genes were all found to be similarly upregulated upon Dicer deletion, as has been reported in the above studies (Figure 1D). To gain a further understanding of the immediate effects of miRNA depletion, we performed gene expression arrays and found 1065 genes that were significantly upregulated (p < 0.05) by 1.2-fold or more (Table S1). We then analyzed the 3′UTRs of these genes using Babelomics software (version 5) to determine the miRNAs that had an enrichment in target sites within these sequences. Interestingly, this analysis revealed the most significant enrichment for miRNA target sites for the miR-290/302, miR-20, and miR-19 families (Figure 1E), which are the most abundantly expressed miRNAs in ESCs and mouse embryos and account for approximately 70% of miRNA expression during early mouse embryogenesis [24]. Therefore, our transient deletion appeared to be a valid system to study miRNA regulation, and it allowed us to study the roles of miRNAs in ESCs while circumventing any secondary effects that may have emerged through the repeated passaging required for the establishment and maintenance of stable Dicer−/− lines.

3.2. Dicer−/− ESCs Display Increased Cytoplasmic Ca2+ Levels upon Thapsigargin Treatment

We next pursued the regulatory pathways that are disrupted upon transient miRNA depletion using the DAVID functional annotation tool. A total of 64 terms were found to have an enrichment of 2-fold or higher, and these could be broadly broken down into 7 categories—28 terms related to organogenesis, 14 related to signaling, 9 related to adhesion and cell migration, 5 related to proliferation, 2 related to cell commitment and patterning, 2 related to Ca2+ regulation, and 4 outside these categories (Table S2). Of these categories, Ca2+ signaling stood out as a novel pathway not previously known to be regulated by miRNAs in ESCs. Therefore, we decided to investigate the roles of miRNAs in regulating Ca2+ signaling in ESCs. To analyze Ca2+ signaling, cytoplasmic Ca2+ levels were examined using live-cell imaging with the ratiometric dye Fura-2, AM. The 340/380 nm-emission ratio was analyzed over a time course of 4 min, and no difference was found in the basal Ca2+ levels between Dicer deleted (Dicer−/−) and undeleted (Dicerfl/fl) ESCs (Figure 2). Since the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) is the major storage site for Ca2+ in ESCs [26], we asked if perturbations in Ca2+ transport across the ER membrane would differentially affect cytoplasmic Ca2+ levels in Dicer−/− ESCs. Thapsigargin inhibits Ca2+ uptake into the ER by blocking the sarcoendoplasmic reticulum Ca2+—ATPase (SERCA), which results in the release of Ca2+ into the cytoplasm through ER Ca2+ export transporters. Therefore, we tested if the Dicer−/− and Dicerfl/fl ESCs were differentially sensitive to the addition of thapsigargin and found that Dicer−/− ESCs had an increased cytoplasmic Ca2+ response (Figure 2). The difference in response time in these experiments was not reproducible and was a technical issue of how fast the addition of the HBSS solution containing thapsigargin could mix with buffer in the dish and diffuse into the cells.

3.3. miRNA Regulation of Ca2+ Homeostasis Plays Virtually No Role in the Stress Response of ESCs

Increases in cytoplasmic Ca2+ levels can lead to apoptosis by inducing mitochondria to release cytochrome C and stimulate a cascade of caspase activation, leading to the cleavage and activation of caspase 3 [27]. Therefore, we tested if the increased levels of cytoplasmic Ca2+ in Dicer−/− ESCs treated with thapsigargin enhanced apoptosis. At 1 μM, thapsigargin killed both Dicerfl/fl and Dicer−/− ESCs after only a few hours of exposure. Therefore, we tested apoptosis levels by Annexin V staining using a reduced concentration of thapsigargin at 200 nM. This gave an overall reduced Ca2+ response with fewer cells responding. However, there was a greater number of responsive cells in Dicer−/− ESCs (Figure S1). After 8 h of 200nM thapsigargin treatment, there was no difference in apoptosis between Dicerfl/fl and Dicer−/− ESCs, nor was there a difference at 48 h, when most of the cells in both cell types stained positive for Annexin V. However, after 24 h of treatment, there was a slight but statistically significant increase in apoptosis in Dicer−/− ESCs (Figure 3A). Interestingly, this increased sensitivity did not correlate with an increase in activated caspase 3 (Figure 3B). If anything, it appeared to lead to a decrease, but repeat experiments revealed that this difference was not statistically significant. Therefore, the difference in thapsigargin sensitivity after 8 h of exposure appeared to result from alternative mechanisms unrelated to the Ca2+-induced release of mitochondrial cytochrome C and activation of the caspase cascade.
Thapsigargin also induces canonical stress response pathways by stimulating the unfolded protein stress response by reducing Ca2+ levels in the ER [28,29]. This decreases the activity of Ca2+ binding chaperones such as BiP that are involved in protein folding and leads to the phosphorylation of eIF2α by PERK, which reduces the translation of most cellular proteins and gives the cell time to recover. However, if the stress is too severe, proapoptotic proteins such as CHOP become expressed and lead to apoptosis. Since miRNAs have been implicated in regulating the general stress response mechanisms of cells [30], we examined their roles in the unfolded protein response of ESCs by analyzing the levels and phosphorylation of the above key proteins. Interestingly, when compared to control cells, the expression of CHOP and BiP as well as the phosphorylation of eIF2α appeared to be attenuated upon miRNA depletion. However, densitometric analysis of this and repeat experiments revealed that the differences were not significant (Figure 3B). Therefore, miRNAs did not appear to regulate the unfolded protein response in ESCs and, in fact, they appeared to play insignificant roles in the overall stress response to thapsigargin of ESCs.

3.4. miRNAs Regulate Cytoplasmic Ca2+ Levels upon the Stimulation of Purinergic Receptors

A key question is whether miRNAs regulate Ca2+ levels under normal physiological conditions that do not involve pharmacological inhibitors of Ca2+ transport. Therefore, we examined if miRNAs could regulate normal signaling mechanisms that lead to increases in cytoplasmic Ca2+ levels. Exogenous ATP stimulates Ca2+ release in ESCs by binding to purinergic receptors and, just as with thapsigargin treatment, Dicer−/− ESCs had an increased cytoplasmic Ca2+ response to ATP stimulation (Figure 4). Therefore, miRNAs are important in regulating the Ca2+ response of physiological signaling events of ESCs, which could play a role in ESC pluripotency and differentiation mechanisms.

3.5. The miRNA Regulation of Ca2+ Homeostasis Correlates with an Increased Expression of the IP3 Receptor 2 (Itpr2)

To test if the enhanced sensitivity of Dicer−/− ESCs to thapsigargin was due to effects on Ca2+ transport across the ER membrane or from extracellular sources through store-operated Ca2+ entry, we treated ESCs with thapsigargin in the absence of extracellular Ca2+ using HBSS without Ca2+. Once again, Dicer−/− ESCs displayed an increased cytoplasmic Ca2+ response (Figure 5A), indicating that mechanisms other than store-operated Ca2+ entry were important. Furthermore, the reduction of cytoplasmic Ca2+ levels over time in these experiments was nearly identical between Dicerfl/fl and Dicer−/− ESCs. Therefore, the increased Ca2+ response of Dicer−/− ESCs appeared not to result from differences in cytoplasmic Ca2+ clearance mechanisms involving the export of Ca2+ through plasma membrane transporters or its sequestration into other organelles. Instead, the differences appeared to be primarily from effects on Ca2+ release from the ER.
One possible explanation for the miRNA-mediated buffering of Ca2+ levels in the cytoplasm could be through their regulation of Ca2+ transporters in the ER. Ca2+ release from the ER is mediated by the stimulation of ryanodine and inositol trisphosphate (IP3) receptors in the ER membrane, whereas import into the ER is mediated by SERCA, as stated above. ESCs have very low expression of ryanodine receptors [26] and, consistent with this, the stimulation of ryanodine receptors by the agonist caffeine gave a minimal Ca2+ response, which was very similar in Dicerfl/fl and Dicer−/− ESCs (Figure 5B). In contrast, IP3 receptors are expressed in ESCs, and one isoform, Itpr2 was found to be more highly expressed in Dicer−/− ESCs. Likewise, one isoform of SERCA (SERCA1 encoded by Atp2a1) had increased mRNA levels. However, the increase at the protein level was harder to observe due to the weak detection by the SERCA1 antibody (Figure 5C). Therefore, these data suggested that Dicer−/− ESCs have an enhanced export capacity that can be compensated by uptake through SERCA under normal conditions. This would explain why the basal Ca2+ levels are stable in Dicer−/− ESCs but enhanced when Ca2+ uptake into the ER is blocked by thapsigargin.

3.6. miRNAs Primarily Regulate the Level of Itpr2 Expression Indirectly in ESCs

To determine if miRNA regulation of Itpr2 and Atp2a1 involves a direct targeting of miRNAs to sequences in their 3′UTRs, luciferase reporters were constructed containing their 3′ UTRs and tested for miRNA regulation in ESCs. In addition, 3′ UTR reporters were also constructed for Itpr1 and Itpr3. These were transfected into Dicerfl/fl and Dicer−/− ESCs along with a Renilla luciferase gene to normalize transfection efficiency. Comparing the ratio of the relative luciferase activities between Dicerfl/fl and Dicer−/− ESCs revealed that the 3′ UTRs of Itpr2 and Itpr1 imparted miRNA regulation on luciferase expression, whereas the 3′ UTRs of Itpr3 and Atp2a1 did not (Figure 6A). The lack of effect of the Atp2a1 3′ UTR contrasted with the effect of miRNAs on the endogenous gene. Therefore, other mechanisms must indirectly mediate miRNA regulation of the endogenous gene. Also in discordance was the miRNA regulation imparted by the Itpr1 3′ UTR as the endogenous gene appeared not to be regulated by miRNAs. Therefore, the effect of its 3′ UTR appeared to be context-dependent. Nevertheless, its regulation along with that of Itpr2 was pursued to identify individual regulatory miRNAs.
To identify relevant miRNAs, we hypothesized that important miRNAs would be abundantly expressed in ESCs. miRNAs can be grouped into seed families, which contain the same seed sequence of approximately seven nucleotides near the 5′ end of the miRNA. Canonical miRNA targeting typically requires near-perfect homology across the seed sequence but tolerates multiple mismatches throughout the remainder of the sequence; thus, miRNA seed families generally target the same messages. Therefore, we looked for predicted miRNA target sites of the most abundantly expressed miRNA seed families in ESCs using Targetscan (www.targetscan.org, accessed on 1 June 2022) [31]. The top 10 expressed miRNA seed families in ESCs, as determined by the numbers of sequence reads in the whole-genome sequencing of small RNAs [25], are listed in Figure 6B. These account for over 80% of the sequence reads of all miRNAs expressed in ESCs; thus, these were investigated as likely candidates for regulating ER Ca2+ transporter genes. Consistent with a lack of miRNA regulation of the Itpr3 and Atp2a1 reporters in ESCs, the 3′ UTRs of these genes did not contain any predicted target sites for these miRNA seed families. In contrast, the 3′ UTRs of Itpr1 and Itpr2 did contain predicted target sites for several of these miRNA seed families, several of which were highly conserved in vertebrate species in addition to others that were poorly conserved. Representative miRNAs of these seed families were tested for their ability to regulate the Itpr1 and Itpr2 3′UTR reporters in co-transfection experiments using HEK293T cells. All the tested miRNAs were able to suppress the expression of reporters containing synthetic optimal target sites in their 3′ UTRs (Figure S2); yet, the only miRNA that could suppress the expression of either of the Itpr reporters was miR-92 on Itpr1 (Figure 6C). The suppression of the Itpr1 reporter by miR-92 primarily required its predicted target site as the mutation of this sequence in the reporter significantly relieved suppression by miR-92 (Figure S3A). Interestingly, the miR-92 mimic had no effect on the expression of the endogenous Itpr1 in ESCs (Figure S3B), which was consistent with the lack of miRNA regulation of the endogenous Itpr1. Likewise, it was not able to attenuate the Ca2+ response in Dicer−/− ESCs (Figure S3C). Therefore, the differences in the miRNA regulation of the Itpr1 3′UTR reporter and endogenous gene could be due to differences in the overall tertiary structure of their RNAs and/or their association with RNA-binding proteins, which affected the accessibility of the target site.
Other miRNAs either had no effect on either reporter or, in some cases, enhanced reporter expression, which presumably occurred through indirect mechanisms. With Itpr2, none of these individual miRNAs or their combination could suppress its expression. Therefore, the specific miRNA(s) regulating this reporter in ESCs could not be determined. This left the possibility that either less abundant miRNAs could be important or some of the non-tested abundant miRNAs could mediate suppression through non-conventional target recognition that is not dependent on the seed sequence. Alternatively, miRNAs could function indirectly by regulating the expression of RNA-binding proteins that interact with the Itpr2 3′ UTR and impact message stability and translation.
In addition to the above regulatory mechanisms through the 3′ UTR of Itpr2, miRNAs might also regulate Itpr2 expression indirectly through transcriptional means. Consistent with this was the observation that the miRNA effect on the expression of the endogenous Itpr2 was much greater than their effect on the Itpr2 3′ UTR reporter. To analyze transcriptional activity, primary transcript levels were measured because primary transcripts are typically spliced rapidly, leading to their levels generally being determined by transcriptional activity. qPCR primers across the first intron of Itpr2 as well as Itpr1 and Atp2a1 were used to analyze their primary transcript levels in Dicerfl/fl and Dicer−/− ESCs. In addition, primers spanning across adjacent exons were used to measure the mature mRNA levels (Figure 6D). Of these three genes, only Itpr2 displayed an increase in the level of its primary transcript in Dicer−/− ESCs. Therefore, miRNAs appeared to regulate Itpr2 transcription. In contrast, there was no increase in the primary transcript levels of Atp2a1 or Itpr1, which, with Itpr1, was consistent with the lack of an increase in the mature transcript. However, the lack of a miRNA effect on the primary transcript levels of Atp2a1 indicated that the increase in the mature mRNA level was not due to transcriptional regulation. Therefore, this and its lack of miRNA regulation through its 3′ UTR indicated that an indirect mechanism of regulating message stability appeared to be important.
How can miRNAs regulate the transcription of Itpr2 in ESCs? The most straightforward mechanism would be through the miRNA suppression of important transcriptional activators. However, little is known about the transcriptional regulation of Itpr2, and no transcriptional activators have been identified. In contrast, two transcriptional repressors have been shown to suppress ITPR2 expression in human cells. BTB and CNC Homology 1 (BACH1) and retinoid X receptor alpha (RXRA) suppress the expression of ITPR2 in HEK293T cells and primary human fibroblasts, respectively [32,33]. Even if the miRNA-regulated expression of these were important for the increased Itpr2 expression in Dicer−/− ESCs, they would have to be indirectly upregulated by miRNAs. However, neither of these two repressors was differentially expressed in Dicer−/− ESCs (Figure 6E). Therefore, miRNAs must regulate other transcriptional regulators, and identifying these miRNA targets will require a better understanding of Itpr2 transcriptional regulation.

4. Discussion

In this report, we have found that the miRNA regulation of gene expression plays a role in buffering cytoplasmic Ca2+ levels upon exposure to thapsigargin or through normal signaling mechanisms that stimulate the release of Ca2+ from the ER. miRNA regulation of the IP3 receptor gene Itpr2 offers one possible mechanism for mediating Ca2+ buffering; thus, it will be important to learn how miRNAs regulate Itpr2 expression in ESCs. In other cell types, miRNAs have been found to directly target sites in the Itpr2 3′ UTR and regulate Itpr2 expression. miR-34a and -133a regulate Itpr2 expression in T-cells and myocardium, respectively [34,35]. However, these miRNAs are barely expressed in ESCs [25]; thus, they are unlikely to be important regulators of Itpr2 expression in ESCs. In contrast, miRNAs play an important role in the transcriptional regulation of Itpr2 expression in ESCs. Therefore, it will be important to understand the miRNA regulation of key transcriptional activators. However, the transcriptional regulation of Itpr2 has been little studied; thus, the miRNA regulation of such activators awaits a better understanding of Itpr2 transcriptional regulation.
An even more interesting question from these studies is how the miRNA buffering of cytoplasmic Ca2+ levels impacts the biology of ESCs. Ca2+ is an essential and ubiquitous signaling ion that plays a vast array of roles in cellular physiology, and its deregulation is directly linked to disease [36]. High mitochondrial Ca2+ levels are known to cause mitochondrial swelling and dysfunction and can trigger the opening of the mitochondrial permeability transition pore that activates apoptotic cascades [27]. However, there was no difference in the thapsigargin-induced activation of the terminal caspase (caspase 3) between Dicerfl/fl and Dicer−/− ESCs. Therefore, the increased Ca2+ response of Dicer−/− ESCs did not further activate this pathway and, thus, the slight increase in thapsigargin-induced apoptosis in Dicer−/− ESCs that was observed only after 24 h of exposure must have been due to other mechanisms.
Survival can also be regulated by the activation of canonical stress response pathways, and miRNAs have been found to regulate multiple steps in these pathways [30]. However, we found no enhancement of canonical stress response pathways in the Dicer−/− ESCs under the conditions tested. Therefore, either (1) ESCs are different from other cell types and do not utilize miRNAs to regulate the stress response pathways or (2) the regulation of these stress response pathways was overwhelmed by the stress conditions utilized in this study.
Ca2+ signaling has also been suggested to play roles during the early stages of vertebrate differentiation into the neural and cardiac lineages [37,38,39]. The increased Ca2+ response to ATP stimulation could indicate that other pathways that induce Ca2+ could also be influenced by miRNAs; thus, it is tempting to speculate that alterations in the Ca2+ response to signaling pathways in Dicer−/− ESCs could possibly impact differentiation. Unfortunately, we were not able to test this possibility here for two reasons. First, Dicer−/− cell lines fail to differentiate as miRNAs are required for the exit of pluripotency via the regulation of genes such as Rbl2, which is required for the methylation and stable repression of Oct4 expression and which we also found upregulated in our transient deletions [7,8]. Second, when we allowed Dicerfl/fl cells to exit pluripotency and then added tamoxifen to delete Dicer, we observed massive cell death (data not shown) due to the importance of miRNAs in regulating cell survival during differentiation [4,24]. Therefore, the effects of miRNAs involved in these processes may mask the effects of any miRNAs in regulating Ca2+ signaling. Because of this, it will be important to identify individual miRNAs that mediate the regulation of Ca2+ levels and analyze the impact of their manipulation on Ca2+ signaling during the differentiation of ESCs.

5. Conclusions

This study establishes an important new role for miRNAs in buffering Ca2+ levels in the pluripotent state and identifies another potentially important regulatory mechanism for their biology. However, until individual miRNAs are identified, we cannot eliminate the possibility that other functions of Dicer could also be important in regulating the expression of genes involved in Ca2+ homeostasis in ESCs. Dicer can process other RNAs in the cell and affect the function of other proteins to which it forms a complex [40]. However, the mechanisms by which these other functions of Dicer could regulate gene expression are much less understood and, in other developmental systems that are affected by the deletion of Dicer, specific miRNAs have been found to be important for the phenotype. Therefore, miRNA synthesis appears to be the major role of Dicer in development, but these alternative mechanisms of Dicer may prove to be additionally important.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/cells12151957/s1: Table S1: Upregulated genes in Dicer−/− compared to Dicerfl/fl ESCs from gene expression arrays. Table S2: DAVID analysis showing regulatory pathways that are disrupted in Dicer−/− ESCs. Figure S1: Cytoplasmic Ca2+ response using 200nM thapsigargin. Figure S2: miRNA mimics positive controls. Figure S3. miR-92 effects on Itpr1 3’ UTR reporter and endogenous Itpr1.

Author Contributions

K.M.R. and B.S.C. designed and performed most of the experiments with contributions from S.T., B.P. and J.M.S.-N. produced the gene expression arrays and performed the bioinformatics analysis. All experiments were conducted under the supervision of B.S.C. and T.A.R., D.F. and M.C. provided technical support for the use of the microscope in Ca2+-recording experiments. B.S.C., K.M.R. and T.A.R. wrote the paper, and all authors contributed to its editing. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by a Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC) grant (BB/H018573/1), and Kimberley Reid was supported by a BBSRC fellowship.

Data Availability Statement

Array data have been deposited in the GEO repository with the accession number GSE93725.

Acknowledgments

We thank Andrew Hibbert, James Allum, Katy Bacon, William Morely, Helen Fraser, and Mia Choe for technical assistance and Ruby Chang for help with statistical analysis.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Jonas, S.; Izaurralde, E. Towards a Molecular Understanding of MicroRNA-Mediated Gene Silencing. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2015, 16, 421–433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. He, L.; Hannon, G.J. MicroRNAs: Small RNAs with a Big Role in Gene Regulation. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2004, 5, 522–531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Bernstein, E.; Kim, S.Y.; Carmell, M.A.; Murchison, E.P.; Alcorn, H.; Li, M.Z.; Mills, A.A.; Elledge, S.J.; Anderson, K.V.; Hannon, G.J. Dicer Is Essential for Mouse Development. Nat. Genet. 2003, 35, 215–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Spruce, T.; Pernaute, B.; Di-Gregorio, A.; Cobb, B.S.; Merkenschlager, M.; Manzanares, M.; Rodriguez, T.A. An Early Developmental Role for MiRNAs in the Maintenance of Extraembryonic Stem Cells in the Mouse Embryo. Dev. Cell 2010, 19, 207–219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Murchison, E.P.; Partridge, J.F.; Tam, O.H.; Cheloufi, S.; Hannon, G.J. Characterization of Dicer-Deficient Murine Embryonic Stem Cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2005, 102, 12135–12140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Kanellopoulou, C.; Muljo, S.A.; Kung, A.L.; Ganesan, S.; Drapkin, R.; Jenuwein, T.; Livingston, D.M.; Rajewsky, K. Dicer-Deficient Mouse Embryonic Stem Cells Are Defective in Differentiation and Centromeric Silencing. Genes Dev. 2005, 19, 489–501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Benetti, R.; Gonzalo, S.; Jaco, I.; Muñoz, P.; Gonzalez, S.; Schoeftner, S.; Murchison, E.; Andl, T.; Chen, T.; Klatt, P.; et al. A Mammalian MicroRNA Cluster Controls DNA Methylation and Telomere Recombination via Rbl2-Dependent Regulation of DNA Methyltransferases. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2008, 15, 268–279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Sinkkonen, L.; Hugenschmidt, T.; Berninger, P.; Gaidatzis, D.; Mohn, F.; Artus-Revel, C.G.; Zavolan, M.; Svoboda, P.; Filipowicz, W. MicroRNAs Control de Novo DNA Methylation through Regulation of Transcriptional Repressors in Mouse Embryonic Stem Cells. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2008, 15, 259–267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Tay, Y.; Zhang, J.; Thomson, A.M.; Lim, B.; Rigoutsos, I. MicroRNAs to Nanog, Oct4 and Sox2 Coding Regions Modulate Embryonic Stem Cell Differentiation. Nature 2008, 455, 1124–1128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Melton, C.; Judson, R.L.; Blelloch, R. Opposing MicroRNA Families Regulate Self-Renewal in Mouse Embryonic Stem Cells. Nature 2010, 463, 621–626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Ma, Y.; Yao, N.; Liu, G.; Dong, L.; Liu, Y.; Zhang, M.; Wang, F.; Wang, B.; Wei, X.; Dong, H.; et al. Functional Screen Reveals Essential Roles of MiR-27a/24 in Differentiation of Embryonic Stem Cells. EMBO J. 2015, 34, 361–378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  12. Wang, Y.; Baskerville, S.; Shenoy, A.; Babiarz, J.E.; Baehner, L.; Blelloch, R. Embryonic Stem Cell–Specific MicroRNAs Regulate the G1-S Transition and Promote Rapid Proliferation. Nat. Genet. 2008, 40, 1478–1483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Cao, Y.; Guo, W.-T.; Tian, S.; He, X.; Wang, X.-W.; Liu, X.; Gu, K.-L.; Ma, X.; Huang, D.; Hu, L.; et al. MiR-290/371-Mbd2-Myc Circuit Regulates Glycolytic Metabolism to Promote Pluripotency. EMBO J. 2015, 34, 609–623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Zheng, G.X.Y.; Ravi, A.; Calabrese, J.M.; Medeiros, L.A.; Kirak, O.; Dennis, L.M.; Jaenisch, R.; Burge, C.B.; Sharp, P.A. A Latent Pro-Survival Function for the Mir-290-295 Cluster in Mouse Embryonic Stem Cells. PLoS Genet. 2011, 7, e1002054. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Graham, B.; Marcais, A.; Dharmalingam, G.; Carroll, T.; Kanellopoulou, C.; Graumann, J.; Nesterova, T.B.; Bermange, A.; Brazauskas, P.; Xella, B.; et al. MicroRNAs of the MiR-290-295 Family Maintain Bivalency in Mouse Embryonic Stem Cells. Stem Cell Rep. 2016, 6, 635–642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Hao, B.; Webb, S.E.; Miller, A.L.; Yue, J. The Role of Ca2+ Signaling on the Self-Renewal and Neural Differentiation of Embryonic Stem Cells (ESCs). Cell Calcium 2016, 59, 67–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Li, X.; Zhu, L.; Yang, A.; Lin, J.; Tang, F.; Jin, S.; Wei, Z.; Li, J.; Jin, Y. Calcineurin-NFAT Signaling Critically Regulates Early Lineage Specification in Mouse Embryonic Stem Cells and Embryos. Cell Stem Cell 2011, 8, 46–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  18. Webb, S.E.; Miller, A.L. Calcium Signalling during Embryonic Development. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2003, 4, 539–551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Finger, F.; Hoppe, T. MicroRNAs Meet Calcium: Joint Venture in ER Proteostasis. Sci. Signal. 2014, 7, re11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Nesterova, T.B.; Popova, B.C.; Cobb, B.S.; Norton, S.; Senner, C.E.; Tang, Y.A.; Spruce, T.; Rodriguez, T.A.; Sado, T.; Merkenschlager, M.; et al. Dicer Regulates Xist Promoter Methylation in ES Cells Indirectly through Transcriptional Control of Dnmt3a. Epigenetics Chromatin 2008, 1, 2–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Medina, I.; Carbonell, J.; Pulido, L.; Madeira, S.C.; Goetz, S.; Conesa, A.; Tárraga, J.; Pascual-Montano, A.; Nogales-Cadenas, R.; Santoyo, J.; et al. Babelomics: An Integrative Platform for the Analysis of Transcriptomics, Proteomics and Genomic Data with Advanced Functional Profiling. Nucleic Acids Res. 2010, 38, W210–W213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Huang, D.W.; Sherman, B.T.; Lempicki, R.A. Systematic and Integrative Analysis of Large Gene Lists Using DAVID Bioinformatics Resources. Nat. Protoc. 2009, 4, 44–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Malgaroli, A.; Milani, D.; Meldolesi, J.; Pozzan, T. Fura-2 Measurement of Cytosolic Free Ca2+ in Monolayers and Suspensions of Various Types of Animal Cells. J. Cell Biol. 1987, 105, 2145–2155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Pernaute, B.; Spruce, T.; Smith, K.M.; Sánchez-Nieto, J.M.; Manzanares, M.; Cobb, B.; Rodriguez, T.A. MicroRNAs Control the Apoptotic Threshold in Primed Pluripotent Stem Cells through Regulation of BIM. Genes Dev. 2014, 28, 1873–1878. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Babiarz, J.E.; Ruby, J.G.; Wang, Y.; Bartel, D.P.; Blelloch, R. Mouse ES Cells Express Endogenous ShRNAs, SiRNAs, and Other Microprocessor-Independent, Dicer-Dependent Small RNAs. Genes Dev. 2008, 22, 2773–2785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Yanagida, E.; Shoji, S.; Hirayama, Y.; Yoshikawa, F.; Otsu, K.; Uematsu, H.; Hiraoka, M.; Furuichi, T.; Kawano, S. Functional Expression of Ca2+ Signaling Pathways in Mouse Embryonic Stem Cells. Cell Calcium 2004, 36, 135–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Pinton, P.; Giorgi, C.; Siviero, R.; Zecchini, E.; Rizzuto, R. Calcium and Apoptosis: ER-Mitochondria Ca2+ Transfer in the Control of Apoptosis. Oncogene 2008, 27, 6407–6418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Anderson, P.; Kedersha, N. Stressful Initiations. J. Cell Sci. 2002, 115, 3227–3234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Holcik, M.; Sonenberg, N. Translational Control in Stress and Apoptosis. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2005, 6, 318–327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Emde, A.; Hornstein, E. MiRNAs at the Interface of Cellular Stress and Disease. EMBO J. 2014, 33, 1428–1437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Lewis, B.P.; Burge, C.B.; Bartel, D.P. Conserved Seed Pairing, Often Flanked by Adenosines, Indicates That Thousands of Human Genes Are MicroRNA Targets. Cell 2005, 120, 15–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Warnatz, H.-J.; Schmidt, D.; Manke, T.; Piccini, I.; Sultan, M.; Borodina, T.; Balzereit, D.; Wruck, W.; Soldatov, A.; Vingron, M.; et al. The BTB and CNC Homology 1 (BACH1) Target Genes Are Involved in the Oxidative Stress Response and in Control of the Cell Cycle*. J. Biol. Chem. 2011, 286, 23521–23532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Ma, X.; Warnier, M.; Raynard, C.; Ferrand, M.; Kirsh, O.; Defossez, P.; Martin, N.; Bernard, D. The Nuclear Receptor RXRA Controls Cellular Senescence by Regulating Calcium Signaling. Aging Cell 2018, 17, e12831. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Drawnel, F.M.; Wachten, D.; Molkentin, J.D.; Maillet, M.; Aronsen, J.M.; Swift, F.; Sjaastad, I.; Liu, N.; Catalucci, D.; Mikoshiba, K.; et al. Mutual Antagonism between IP3RII and MiRNA-133a Regulates Calcium Signals and Cardiac Hypertrophy. J. Cell Biol. 2012, 199, 783–798. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Diener, C.; Hart, M.; Alansary, D.; Poth, V.; Walch-Rückheim, B.; Menegatti, J.; Grässer, F.; Fehlmann, T.; Rheinheimer, S.; Niemeyer, B.A.; et al. Modulation of Intracellular Calcium Signaling by MicroRNA-34a-5p. Cell Death Dis. 2018, 9, 1008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Berridge, M.J.; Bootman, M.D.; Roderick, H.L. Calcium Signalling: Dynamics, Homeostasis and Remodelling. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2003, 4, 517–529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Leclerc, C.; Néant, I.; Moreau, M. The Calcium: An Early Signal That Initiates the Formation of the Nervous System during Embryogenesis. Front. Mol. Neurosci. 2012, 5, 3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Papanayotou, C.; Almeida, I.D.; Liao, P.; Oliveira, N.M.M.; Lu, S.-Q.; Kougioumtzidou, E.; Zhu, L.; Shaw, A.; Sheng, G.; Streit, A.; et al. Calfacilitin Is a Calcium Channel Modulator Essential for Initiation of Neural Plate Development. Nat. Commun. 2013, 4, 1837. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Tyser, R.; Miranda, A.; Chen, C.; Davidson, S.M. Calcium Handling Precedes Cardiac Differentiation to Initiate the First Heartbeat. eLife 2016, 5, e17113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Song, M.-S.; Rossi, J.J. Molecular Mechanisms of Dicer: Endonuclease and Enzymatic Activity. Biochem. J. 2017, 474, 1603–1618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Cells 12 01957 g001 550
Figure 1. Characterizing the deletion of Dicer and loss of miRNAs in ESCs. (A) Dicerfl/fl ESCs were treated with 0.5 mM tamoxifen for 3 days, and the loss of Dicer protein relative to β-actin was measured in Western blots of total cellular protein extracts. On the left is a representative experiment and on the right is the quantitation by densitometry from 10 independent experiments where Dicer proteins were determined relative to untreated cells. (B) qPCR analysis from total RNA revealed the loss of indicated miRNAs. Data are from three independent experiments repeated in duplicate. (C) Cells were cultured for an additional 2 or 3 days without tamoxifen, and the levels of the indicated members of the miR-290/302 and miR-19 families were determined by qPCR. Data are from two or three independent experiments repeated in duplicate. (D) Genes whose miRNA regulation was previously shown to be important for ESC differentiation and cell cycle regulation were similarly upregulated when compared to Dicer−/− stable cell lines. qPCR data are from four independent experiments (Rbl2 mean = 1.3-fold, p = 0.02; Lats2 mean = 3.4-fold, p = 0.006; Cdkn1a mean = 1.2-fold, p = 0.0008; Dicer mean = 0.04-fold, p = 0.0003). (E) Table displaying the miRNA families and specific miRNAs belonging to these families that have a significant number of predicted targets enriched among genes upregulated in Dicer−/− ESCs. Using the Babilomics platform, these studies identified the miRNAs of the miR-19, miR-20, and miR-290/302 families, (some of the most abundantly expressed miRNAs in ESCs and the early embryo [24,25]) as having a significantly enriched number of target sites within the upregulated genes. A two-tailed Fisher exact test was used to determine significance (adjusted p < 0.05), * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001.
Figure 1. Characterizing the deletion of Dicer and loss of miRNAs in ESCs. (A) Dicerfl/fl ESCs were treated with 0.5 mM tamoxifen for 3 days, and the loss of Dicer protein relative to β-actin was measured in Western blots of total cellular protein extracts. On the left is a representative experiment and on the right is the quantitation by densitometry from 10 independent experiments where Dicer proteins were determined relative to untreated cells. (B) qPCR analysis from total RNA revealed the loss of indicated miRNAs. Data are from three independent experiments repeated in duplicate. (C) Cells were cultured for an additional 2 or 3 days without tamoxifen, and the levels of the indicated members of the miR-290/302 and miR-19 families were determined by qPCR. Data are from two or three independent experiments repeated in duplicate. (D) Genes whose miRNA regulation was previously shown to be important for ESC differentiation and cell cycle regulation were similarly upregulated when compared to Dicer−/− stable cell lines. qPCR data are from four independent experiments (Rbl2 mean = 1.3-fold, p = 0.02; Lats2 mean = 3.4-fold, p = 0.006; Cdkn1a mean = 1.2-fold, p = 0.0008; Dicer mean = 0.04-fold, p = 0.0003). (E) Table displaying the miRNA families and specific miRNAs belonging to these families that have a significant number of predicted targets enriched among genes upregulated in Dicer−/− ESCs. Using the Babilomics platform, these studies identified the miRNAs of the miR-19, miR-20, and miR-290/302 families, (some of the most abundantly expressed miRNAs in ESCs and the early embryo [24,25]) as having a significantly enriched number of target sites within the upregulated genes. A two-tailed Fisher exact test was used to determine significance (adjusted p < 0.05), * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001.
Cells 12 01957 g001
Cells 12 01957 g002 550
Figure 2. Dicer−/− ESCs show increased cytoplasmic Ca2+ levels upon thapsigargin treatment. Dicerfl/fl and Dicer−/− ESCs were loaded with 4 mM Fura-2, AM, and cytoplasmic Ca2+ levels were analyzed by fluorescence microscopy every second at 340 and 380 nm. The ratio of the emission at 510 nm from the two excitation wavelengths was plotted for individual cells (minimum of 30 cells per experiment). After 4 min, cells were treated with 1 μM thapsigargin (Tg). (A) Representative graphs from single experiments are shown. (B) The mean basal and peak thapsigargin stimulated ratios from individual experiments were used to calculate cytoplasmic Ca2+ levels (as described in the Materials and Methods section), and the bar chart shows the mean and SEM levels from six independent experiments. No difference was observed in the basal Ca2+ levels (ns—not significant). However, Dicer−/− cells had an increased cytoplasmic Ca2+ response to thapsigargin (p = 0.0027), ** p < 0.01.
Figure 2. Dicer−/− ESCs show increased cytoplasmic Ca2+ levels upon thapsigargin treatment. Dicerfl/fl and Dicer−/− ESCs were loaded with 4 mM Fura-2, AM, and cytoplasmic Ca2+ levels were analyzed by fluorescence microscopy every second at 340 and 380 nm. The ratio of the emission at 510 nm from the two excitation wavelengths was plotted for individual cells (minimum of 30 cells per experiment). After 4 min, cells were treated with 1 μM thapsigargin (Tg). (A) Representative graphs from single experiments are shown. (B) The mean basal and peak thapsigargin stimulated ratios from individual experiments were used to calculate cytoplasmic Ca2+ levels (as described in the Materials and Methods section), and the bar chart shows the mean and SEM levels from six independent experiments. No difference was observed in the basal Ca2+ levels (ns—not significant). However, Dicer−/− cells had an increased cytoplasmic Ca2+ response to thapsigargin (p = 0.0027), ** p < 0.01.
Cells 12 01957 g002
Cells 12 01957 g003 550
Figure 3. Dicer−/− ESCs have virtually no difference in stress response pathways. (A) Dicerfl/fl and Dicer−/− ESCs were treated for the indicated times with 200 nM thapsigargin. Apoptotic cells were determined by Annexin V staining directly after the indicated time of treatment. Dicer−/− ESCs had a slight but significant increase in apoptotic cells after 24 h of thapsigargin treatment (p = 0.034) but showed no difference at 8 or 48 h of treatment. Data are from three independent experiments. (B) A total of 200 nM thapsigargin treatment for the indicated times did not induce an increase in the activation of the canonical stress pathways in Dicer−/− ESCs as measured by the expression or phosphorylation levels of indicated proteins in Western blots. Representative Western blots of three independent experiments are presented, and the densitometric quantitation from repeat experiments normalized to b actin is shown on the right, * p < 0.05.
Figure 3. Dicer−/− ESCs have virtually no difference in stress response pathways. (A) Dicerfl/fl and Dicer−/− ESCs were treated for the indicated times with 200 nM thapsigargin. Apoptotic cells were determined by Annexin V staining directly after the indicated time of treatment. Dicer−/− ESCs had a slight but significant increase in apoptotic cells after 24 h of thapsigargin treatment (p = 0.034) but showed no difference at 8 or 48 h of treatment. Data are from three independent experiments. (B) A total of 200 nM thapsigargin treatment for the indicated times did not induce an increase in the activation of the canonical stress pathways in Dicer−/− ESCs as measured by the expression or phosphorylation levels of indicated proteins in Western blots. Representative Western blots of three independent experiments are presented, and the densitometric quantitation from repeat experiments normalized to b actin is shown on the right, * p < 0.05.
Cells 12 01957 g003
Cells 12 01957 g004 550
Figure 4. Dicer−/− ESCs have an increased cytoplasmic Ca2+ response to ATP signaling. Dicerfl/fl and Dicer−/− ESCs were loaded with Fura-2, AM and cytoplasmic Ca2+ levels were analyzed by fluorescence microscopy, as described in Figure 2. Basal levels were established over 4 min; then, cells were stimulated with 5 mM ATP. (A) Graphs from representative experiments are shown. (B) The bar chart shows the mean cytoplasmic Ca2+ levels and SEM values from four independent experiments. Dicer−/− ESCs had an increased cytoplasmic Ca2+ response to ATP stimulation (p = 0.0011), ** p < 0.01.
Figure 4. Dicer−/− ESCs have an increased cytoplasmic Ca2+ response to ATP signaling. Dicerfl/fl and Dicer−/− ESCs were loaded with Fura-2, AM and cytoplasmic Ca2+ levels were analyzed by fluorescence microscopy, as described in Figure 2. Basal levels were established over 4 min; then, cells were stimulated with 5 mM ATP. (A) Graphs from representative experiments are shown. (B) The bar chart shows the mean cytoplasmic Ca2+ levels and SEM values from four independent experiments. Dicer−/− ESCs had an increased cytoplasmic Ca2+ response to ATP stimulation (p = 0.0011), ** p < 0.01.
Cells 12 01957 g004
Cells 12 01957 g005 550
Figure 5. The increased Ca2+ response in Dicer−/− ESCs correlates with an increased expression of the IP3 receptor Itpr2. (A) To examine the effect of store-operated Ca2+ entry on cytoplasmic Ca2+ levels, Fura-2, AM fluorescent experiments were performed, as described in Figure 2 but without extracellular Ca2+. On the left are graphs from representative experiments and on the right is a bar chart showing the mean cytoplasmic Ca2+ levels and SEM values from six independent experiments. Dicer−/− ESCs still had an increased cytoplasmic Ca2+ response to thapsigargin (p = 0.035), indicating that mechanisms other than store-operated Ca2+ entry were important. In addition, the similar recovery rates to basal levels indicated that the clearance mechanisms were similar. Therefore, it appeared that an increased release from the ER was important for the enhanced thapsigargin response of Dicer−/− cells. (B) ER membrane ryanodine receptors appeared not to be important for the enhanced cytoplasmic Ca2+ response of Dicer−/− ESCs. Their stimulation by caffeine elicited a limited response in only a few cells, which was similar in both Dicerfl/fl and Dicer−/− ESCs. Representative graphs from three independent experiments are shown. (C) Dicer−/− ESCs expressed higher levels of the ER Ca2+ transporter genes Itpr2 (p < 0.0001) and Atp2a1 (encoding SERCA1) (p = 0.0212), as measured by qPCR. Likewise, the protein level of Itpr2 as measured in Western blots was increased (p = 0.0116). SERCA1 levels also appeared to be increased. However, the weak detection by the antibody gave variable results such that the difference was not significant (p = 0.0632). qPCR and Western data are each from three independent experiments, * p < 0.05, **** p < 0.0001.
Figure 5. The increased Ca2+ response in Dicer−/− ESCs correlates with an increased expression of the IP3 receptor Itpr2. (A) To examine the effect of store-operated Ca2+ entry on cytoplasmic Ca2+ levels, Fura-2, AM fluorescent experiments were performed, as described in Figure 2 but without extracellular Ca2+. On the left are graphs from representative experiments and on the right is a bar chart showing the mean cytoplasmic Ca2+ levels and SEM values from six independent experiments. Dicer−/− ESCs still had an increased cytoplasmic Ca2+ response to thapsigargin (p = 0.035), indicating that mechanisms other than store-operated Ca2+ entry were important. In addition, the similar recovery rates to basal levels indicated that the clearance mechanisms were similar. Therefore, it appeared that an increased release from the ER was important for the enhanced thapsigargin response of Dicer−/− cells. (B) ER membrane ryanodine receptors appeared not to be important for the enhanced cytoplasmic Ca2+ response of Dicer−/− ESCs. Their stimulation by caffeine elicited a limited response in only a few cells, which was similar in both Dicerfl/fl and Dicer−/− ESCs. Representative graphs from three independent experiments are shown. (C) Dicer−/− ESCs expressed higher levels of the ER Ca2+ transporter genes Itpr2 (p < 0.0001) and Atp2a1 (encoding SERCA1) (p = 0.0212), as measured by qPCR. Likewise, the protein level of Itpr2 as measured in Western blots was increased (p = 0.0116). SERCA1 levels also appeared to be increased. However, the weak detection by the antibody gave variable results such that the difference was not significant (p = 0.0632). qPCR and Western data are each from three independent experiments, * p < 0.05, **** p < 0.0001.
Cells 12 01957 g005
Cells 12 01957 g006 550
Figure 6. miRNA regulation of the expression of Itpr2 is complex and appears to primarily involve transcriptional mechanisms. (A) The 3′ UTRs of Itpr1 and Itpr2 can elicit miRNA regulation in ESCs. Luciferase reporter genes containing the 3′ UTRs of the ER Ca2+ transporter genes were constructed and transfected into Dicerfl/fl and Dicer−/− ESCs along with a Renila luciferase reporter gene to control for transfection efficiency. The ratio of the relative luciferase activities as normalized to the parental control luciferase reporter is shown in the bar graph. Only the 3′ UTRs of Itpr1 (p = 0.0026) and Itpr2 (p = 0.0015) imparted miRNA regulation in ESCs. Data are from eight independent experiments. (B) The table shows the most abundant miRNA seed families in ESCs, as derived from the number of sequences reads in the RNA seq data of [25]. The presence of strongly and poorly conserved predicted target sites for these miRNAs as deduced from TargetScan is also shown. Highlighted in yellow and with arrows are the seed families for which representative members were tested for an effect in reporter assays with the Itpr1 and Itpr2 3′UTR reporter genes. (C) The effect of representative miRNAs of the indicated miRNA seed families on these reporters was analyzed in HEK293T cells using miRNA mimics. The relative luciferase activity normalized to a control non-specific mimic is shown in the bar graphs. The only case of miRNA suppression was for miR-92 of the Itpr1 3′UTR reporter (p = 0.0010). All other miRNAs either had no effect or, in some cases, enhanced the expression of the reporters presumably through indirect effects. Data are from 12 independent experiments each with the exception of miR-96 on pGL3 cont n = 11 and pGL3 Itpr2 3′ UTR n = 7. (D) The miRNA regulation of Itpr2 appeared to be mediated by transcriptional regulation. The relative increase in the primary transcript levels (as measured by qPCR primers to the first intron) (p < 0.0001) was reflected in the increase in the mature transcript levels, as measured by qPCR using primers to the indicated exon sequences (p < 0.0001). This was not the case for Atp2a1 as there was no increase in its primary transcript. Data are from three independent experiments. (E) Expression of two known transcriptional repressors of Itpr2, Bach1, and Rxra is not regulated by miRNAs in ESCs. Mature mRNA levels were measured by qPCR using primers spanning adjacent exons. Data are from three independent experiments, * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001.
Figure 6. miRNA regulation of the expression of Itpr2 is complex and appears to primarily involve transcriptional mechanisms. (A) The 3′ UTRs of Itpr1 and Itpr2 can elicit miRNA regulation in ESCs. Luciferase reporter genes containing the 3′ UTRs of the ER Ca2+ transporter genes were constructed and transfected into Dicerfl/fl and Dicer−/− ESCs along with a Renila luciferase reporter gene to control for transfection efficiency. The ratio of the relative luciferase activities as normalized to the parental control luciferase reporter is shown in the bar graph. Only the 3′ UTRs of Itpr1 (p = 0.0026) and Itpr2 (p = 0.0015) imparted miRNA regulation in ESCs. Data are from eight independent experiments. (B) The table shows the most abundant miRNA seed families in ESCs, as derived from the number of sequences reads in the RNA seq data of [25]. The presence of strongly and poorly conserved predicted target sites for these miRNAs as deduced from TargetScan is also shown. Highlighted in yellow and with arrows are the seed families for which representative members were tested for an effect in reporter assays with the Itpr1 and Itpr2 3′UTR reporter genes. (C) The effect of representative miRNAs of the indicated miRNA seed families on these reporters was analyzed in HEK293T cells using miRNA mimics. The relative luciferase activity normalized to a control non-specific mimic is shown in the bar graphs. The only case of miRNA suppression was for miR-92 of the Itpr1 3′UTR reporter (p = 0.0010). All other miRNAs either had no effect or, in some cases, enhanced the expression of the reporters presumably through indirect effects. Data are from 12 independent experiments each with the exception of miR-96 on pGL3 cont n = 11 and pGL3 Itpr2 3′ UTR n = 7. (D) The miRNA regulation of Itpr2 appeared to be mediated by transcriptional regulation. The relative increase in the primary transcript levels (as measured by qPCR primers to the first intron) (p < 0.0001) was reflected in the increase in the mature transcript levels, as measured by qPCR using primers to the indicated exon sequences (p < 0.0001). This was not the case for Atp2a1 as there was no increase in its primary transcript. Data are from three independent experiments. (E) Expression of two known transcriptional repressors of Itpr2, Bach1, and Rxra is not regulated by miRNAs in ESCs. Mature mRNA levels were measured by qPCR using primers spanning adjacent exons. Data are from three independent experiments, * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001.
Cells 12 01957 g006
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Reid, K.M.; Sanchez-Nieto, J.M.; Terrasse, S.; Faccenda, D.; Pernaute, B.; Campanella, M.; Rodriguez, T.A.; Cobb, B.S. MicroRNAs Regulate Ca2+ Homeostasis in Murine Embryonic Stem Cells. Cells 2023, 12, 1957. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells12151957

AMA Style

Reid KM, Sanchez-Nieto JM, Terrasse S, Faccenda D, Pernaute B, Campanella M, Rodriguez TA, Cobb BS. MicroRNAs Regulate Ca2+ Homeostasis in Murine Embryonic Stem Cells. Cells. 2023; 12(15):1957. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells12151957

Chicago/Turabian Style

Reid, Kimberley M., Juan Miguel Sanchez-Nieto, Sandra Terrasse, Danilo Faccenda, Barbara Pernaute, Michelangelo Campanella, Tristan A. Rodriguez, and Bradley S. Cobb. 2023. "MicroRNAs Regulate Ca2+ Homeostasis in Murine Embryonic Stem Cells" Cells 12, no. 15: 1957. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells12151957

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop