Next Article in Journal
Genome-Wide Analysis of NAC Gene Family and Its Cold-Responsive Transcriptional Dynamics in Coffea arabica
Previous Article in Journal
Integrative Genomics and Precision Breeding for Stress-Resilient Cotton: Recent Advances and Prospects
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Article

A Decision-Support Grid for Evaluating Neonicotinoid Alternatives Based on Environmental and Human Health Impact

1
Department of Plant & Crops, Faculty of Bioscience Engineering, Ghent University, 9000 Ghent, Belgium
2
Flanders Research Institute for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food, Technology and Food Science, Burg. Van Gansberghelaan 115, 9820 Merelbeke-Melle, Belgium
3
Zoology Department, Proefcentrum Fruitteelt Vzw (Pcfruit Vzw), Fruittuinweg 1, 3800 Sint-Truiden, Belgium
4
Department of Agricultural Economics, Faculty of Bioscience Engineering, Ghent University, 9000 Ghent, Belgium
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Agronomy 2025, 15(10), 2392; https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy15102392
Submission received: 29 September 2025 / Revised: 11 October 2025 / Accepted: 14 October 2025 / Published: 15 October 2025
(This article belongs to the Section Pest and Disease Management)

Abstract

The European Union’s goal to reduce pesticide risk, exemplified by restrictions on insecticides like neonicotinoids, necessitates a shift from single-substance risk assessment to a holistic evaluation of pest control strategies. To address this, a novel decision-support grid was developed that integrates 13 environmental, biodiversity, and human health risk indicators for multiple active substances across an entire crop season into a single Final Scenario Score (FSS), ranging from 0 to 1 (where 1 is the risk of the reference scenario). This framework was applied to three case studies in Belgium—sugar beet, apple, and pear cultivation—where neonicotinoid-based reference scenarios were compared with chemical and/or organic alternatives under low (best-case) and high (worst-case) pest pressure conditions. The results highlight the complexity of finding viable alternatives, with an FSS below 0.75 as the justification threshold. In sugar beet, only the best-case chemical alternative (FSS = 0.71) met the threshold, while worst-case chemical alternatives failed due to increased risk. For apple and pear, organic alternatives consistently showed low-risk scores (FSS 0.27–0.61) but faced important efficacy gaps against key insect. Chemical alternatives in orchards were justifiable in low-pressure scenarios (FSS 0.64–0.73) but failed under high pest pressure (FSS 0.91–0.93). This novel decision-support grid proves to be a valuable tool for guiding sustainable pest control strategies for regulators and field advisors.
Keywords: neonicotinoids; decision-support grid; risk indicators; insecticides; sugar beet; apple; pear neonicotinoids; decision-support grid; risk indicators; insecticides; sugar beet; apple; pear

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Raimondi, M.; López, E.D.; Peeters, L.; Reybroeck, W.; Belien, T.; Bylemans, D.; Buysse, J.; De Cauwer, B.; Spanoghe, P. A Decision-Support Grid for Evaluating Neonicotinoid Alternatives Based on Environmental and Human Health Impact. Agronomy 2025, 15, 2392. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy15102392

AMA Style

Raimondi M, López ED, Peeters L, Reybroeck W, Belien T, Bylemans D, Buysse J, De Cauwer B, Spanoghe P. A Decision-Support Grid for Evaluating Neonicotinoid Alternatives Based on Environmental and Human Health Impact. Agronomy. 2025; 15(10):2392. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy15102392

Chicago/Turabian Style

Raimondi, Michael, Edelbis Dávila López, Laura Peeters, Wim Reybroeck, Tim Belien, Dany Bylemans, Jeroen Buysse, Benny De Cauwer, and Pieter Spanoghe. 2025. "A Decision-Support Grid for Evaluating Neonicotinoid Alternatives Based on Environmental and Human Health Impact" Agronomy 15, no. 10: 2392. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy15102392

APA Style

Raimondi, M., López, E. D., Peeters, L., Reybroeck, W., Belien, T., Bylemans, D., Buysse, J., De Cauwer, B., & Spanoghe, P. (2025). A Decision-Support Grid for Evaluating Neonicotinoid Alternatives Based on Environmental and Human Health Impact. Agronomy, 15(10), 2392. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy15102392

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop