Next Article in Journal
Yield Gap Analysis of Alfalfa Grown under Rainfed Condition in Kansas
Next Article in Special Issue
Mycorrhizal Types Regulated the Responses of Biomass in Different Plant Organs to N Addition
Previous Article in Journal
Differential Physiological Response and Potential Toxicological Risk of White Cabbage Grown in Zinc-Spiked Soil
Previous Article in Special Issue
Identification of Unsound Grains in Wheat Using Deep Learning and Terahertz Spectral Imaging Technology
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

The Roles of Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi in Influencing Plant Nutrients, Photosynthesis, and Metabolites of Cereal Crops—A Review

1
Key Laboratory of Plant Nutrition and Agri-Environment in Northwest China, Ministry of Agriculture, College of Natural Resources and Environment, Northwest A&F University, Yangling, Xianyang 712100, China
2
School of Life Sciences, Northeast Normal University, Changchun 130024, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Agronomy 2022, 12(9), 2191; https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy12092191
Submission received: 10 August 2022 / Revised: 6 September 2022 / Accepted: 12 September 2022 / Published: 15 September 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Effects of Arbuscular Mycorrhizal(AM) Fungi on Crop and Its Mechanism)

Abstract

:
Arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungi are one of the important microbiota involved in a relationship with plant roots in which the plants and fungi both share and exchange nutrients and shelter. Cereal crops are the most essential sources of carbohydrates, dietary protein, and vitamin B for humans, and they supply the most fundamental diets. AM fungi are introduced as the optimal approach for real agricultural systems for increasing growth and productivity. According to a study from the previous decade, AM fungi were shown to promote crop growth and production, particularly in cereal crops. The AM fungi symbiosis provides a pleasant environment for microorganisms in the root and soil system, which promotes plant nutrition and water availability. AM fungi increase nutrient uptake and assimilation and also increase photosynthetic activity, which is directly associated with plant growth. Furthermore, AM fungi increase the primary and secondary metabolites, as well as soluble proteins and carbohydrates, in cereals crops. AM fungi have been shown to improve plant biomass, yield, and productivity in cereal crops. Additionally, the use of AM fungi enhances plants’ stress tolerance against various environmental stresses. In this review, we integrate the recent findings regarding the effects of AM fungi application on soil, root systems, nutrient availability and uptake, photosynthesis, metabolites, plant growth, and productivity. Furthermore, a large number of studies have been reviewed, and several limitations and research gaps have been identified that must be addressed in future studies.

1. Introduction

Arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungi are one of the most significant microbiota, which are involved in a symbiotic relationship with the roots of plants [1]. Such symbiotic relationships have been reported in several cereal crops, including wheat (Triticum aestivum maize (Zea mays) and rice (Oryza sativa), and show very positive effects on the growth, yield, and productivity of the host plants [2,3,4,5]. However, the effect of AM fungi on plant growth is also dependent on the plant and AM fungi species, including the soil type and plant growth stage. To date, more than 255 AM fungi species have been identified, including Glomus etunicatum, Funneliformis mosseae, and Rhizophagus irregularis, and they are being used as a commercial AM inoculum for main crops in advanced agricultural systems [6,7,8,9]. Many of these are utilized for a variety of crops, including wheat, maize, and rice, and have either positive, neutral, or even negative effects during pot and field experiments. Nitrate (NO3) and ammonium (NH4+) are used more often in order to produce foods with higher yields, and they alter the structure of the soil and the plant community while also disturbing the function of microorganisms [1,10]. AM fungi may provide some plants with a better environment and improve nutrient uptake even in soil with a low nutrient content [6]. Thus, AM fungi might be used for various plants, particularly cereals, to promote nutrient intake, enhance physiological characteristics, and increase plant growth and production. The present study evaluated the effects of AM fungi on cereal crop growth and yield production, and it also provides the most recent developments regarding the functions of AM fungi in enhancing plant nutrient uptake. Additionally, the impact of AM fungi on physiological functions, including photosynthesis, that are associated to plant growth, development, yield, and quality were examined. Furthermore, various fundamental mechanisms and processes involved in plant growth and the effect of AM fungi on primary and secondary metabolites were also reviewed.

1.1. The Effects of AM on Nutrient Uptake

Because of its enormous impacts on plant systems, the use of AM fungi has emerged as an intriguing strategy for environmentally responsible agriculture [10]. AM fungi are capable for maintaining about 90% of the plant’s P, 60% of its N, and 20% of its carbon [11]. AM fungi increase the concentrations of N, P, calcium (Ca), and other nutrients such as sulfur (S), K, iron (Fe), copper (Cu), manganese (Mn), and zinc (Zn) in various plants as reported by Khan et al. [1], Mei et al. [12], Mustafa et al. [13], Cao et al. [14], and Miransari, [15]. According to Frew et al. [16] and Smith and Smith [17], AM fungi may behave as parasites, extracting carbon while providing very little or no P to the host plant. Additionally, AM fungi may stimulate physiological and biochemical mechanisms in cereal plants at various stages, facilitating early plant growth and increasing stress tolerance as shown in (Table 1).

1.2. The Effects of AM Fungi on the Chlorophylls, Carotenoids, and Photosynthesis Rate

A higher photosynthetic rate could lead to higher metabolism in host plants, resulting in higher growth performance [18]. AM fungi were also reported as failing to enhance host nutrient uptake and failing to increase the rate of photosynthesis under low light conditions [19]. On the other hand, AM fungi facilitate enzymatic activity and increase the chlorophyll content and photosynthetic rate in cereal plants [20,21]. Additionally, under AM fungi inoculation, several enzymes including Phosphoenolpyruvate carboxylase (PEPC) and rubisco could be enhanced, resulting in a higher photosynthetic rate [22,23,24].

1.3. The Effects of AM Fungi on the Primary and Secondary Metabolites

Primary and secondary metabolites are important for plant growth and development. The primary metabolites are used in the fundamental processes of plants, while in regard to the secondary metabolites, many of their chemicals can be used against pathogens for plant protection. Numerous AM fungi, including G. etunicatum, R. irregularis, and Funneliformis mosseae, have been shown to increase primary and secondary metabolites, basic plant functions, and plant growth, as well as tolerance to biotic stress (bacteria and pathogens) and abiotic stress (drought, salt, and heavy metals) [25,26,27]. Moreover, higher metabolomics activities in cereal crops lead to higher growth, yield, and productivity of these crops [28,29]. However, the influence of AM fungi is still quite dynamic and depends on a wide range of factors, including the crop type, plant community, soil structure, and fertilizer management of the crops.
Table 1. The role of AM fungal spores in plant growth and development at different stages of cereal plants.
Table 1. The role of AM fungal spores in plant growth and development at different stages of cereal plants.
PlantAMF SporePlant StageFunctionChanges after AM ColonizationEnvironmental ConditionsReferences
WheatR. irregularisVegetative stageIncreased stress toleranceEnhanced macro and micro nutrient concentrationLow- or high-temperature stress[30]
WheatF. mosseaeVegetative stageIncreased chlorophyll pigmentsIncreased the concentrations of P, N, K, and MgSaline soil condition[31]
WheatF. geosporumSeeding and vegetative stagesMaintenance of PSI and PSIIUpregulation of water and nutrient uptakeSalt, drought, and heavy metal conditions[32]
WheatG. claroideumTillering stageIncreased photosynthesisEnhanced total dry weight and leaf chlorophyll concentrationDrought stress condition[33]
WheatR. intraradices, F. mosseae, F. geosporumTillering stageIncreased the activity of PSI and PSIIIncreased relative water content (RWC)Drought stress condition[34]
MaizeF. mosseaePre-flowering stageIncreased stress toleranceIncreased N and P concentrationUnder water deficit conditions[35]
MaizeG. mosseae,
G. clarum
Seedling stageImproved plant growthIncreased P uptake by AM pathwayUnder P-deficient conditions[36]
MaizeG. etunicatumTillering stageIncreased plant biomassIncreased leaf
water potential
Under P-deficient conditions[36]
MaizeG. intraradices,
G. intraradices
Vegetative stageIncreased water uptake and leaf
water potential
Increased drought stress toleranceUnder sandy loam soil[37]
MaizeR. irregularisSeedling, tillering, and fruiting stagesIncreased root lengthIncreased Cu toleranceUnder heavy metal condition[38]
RiceG. mosseaeHeading stageIncreased root and shoot growthIncreased N accumulation and protein contentUnder greenhouse conditions[39]
RiceC. etunicatumHeading and flowering stageImproving nutrition status and plant growthIncreased net photosynthetic rate, stomatal conductance, and transpiration rateUnder salt stress conditions[40]
SorghumR. irregularisFruiting stageImproved their transpiration efficiency and drought toleranceIncreased uptake 15NUnder drought conditions[41]
SorghumGlomus speciesFlowering and fruiting stagesIncreased root and shoot growthIncreased total dry matter yieldUnder striga hermonthica conditions[42]
BarleyG. mosseaeFlowering stageIncreased resistance against heavy metal conditionsDecreased Cd and Co uptakeUnder heavy metal conditions[43]
BarleyR. irregularisFruiting stageImproved yield productionImproved Zn concentrations in grainUnder overexpression of HvZIP13 gene[44]
OatMix-AMFTillering and flowering stagesIncreased nutrients and plant growthImproved the P content in plantsUnder fumigated soil[45]
OatMix-AMF with organic fertilizerEarly and late flowering stagesIncreased photosynthesis and plant growthImproved total N and P concentrations and dry weight of plantUnder organic farming conditions[46]
BuckwheatMix-AMFFruiting stageIncreased growth and productivityImproved the nutritional and functional qualityUnder greenhouse conditions[47]
BuckwheatA. laevisFruiting stageIncreased plant growthIncreased plant height, leaf area, number of branchesUnder organic conditions[48]
BuckwheatGlomus speciesHarvesting stagePlant biomassIncreased inorganic phosphorus uptakeUnder organic garden conditions[49]
QuinoaG. mosseaeFruiting stagePlant growthDecreased uptake of 137CsUnder loamy sand conditions[50]
QuinoaG. mosseaeFruiting stageShoot and root growthImproved nutrient uptakeUnder different nitrogen levels[51]
MilletG. mosseaeHarvesting stagePlant height and dry weight of rootImproved P and N uptakeUnder experimental pot conditions[52]
MilletR. fasciculatusFruiting stage and harvesting stagePlant growth and grain yieldIncreased the lengths and weights of shoots and rootsUnder Benomyl conditions[53]

2. AM Fungi and Mineral Nutrition

AM fungi provide nutrient access to the host plants that are otherwise unavailable, resulting higher nutrient uptakes [54]. AM fungi provide higher nutrient availability and promote plant nutrient uptake to the host plant via the mycorrhizal uptake pathway, as shown in (Figure 1). The wheat plants inoculated with F. mosseae and R. intraradices showed a 2.5 times higher Zn uptake compared with non-inoculated plants (Table 2). Similarly, as reported by Pellegrino et al. [55] and Schweiger and Jakobsen [56], AM fungi considerably contributed to overall P uptake and soil fertility through the mycorrhizal uptake pathway in field-grown winter wheat. It is commonly acknowledged that the mycorrhizal uptake pathway is the one that allows plants to acquire phosphorus more quickly and effectively than the root uptake pathway. The N and P uptake in organic field wheat was increased by about 2.3 times by Glomus species as compared to the traditional system in the Canadian prairie [57]. However, it is also hypothesized that AM fungi could produce non-beneficial effects on wheat in the field depending on the P status in the soil, including the AM fungi status in the soil community [58]. Maize plants inoculated with R. irregularis had longer roots and higher P absorption under alkaline conditions; this is because AM fungi facilitate N and P uptake [38]. The AM fungus Glomus intraradices boosted the Zn and P content in the shoots of maize after 45 and 75 days after inoculation, respectively [59]. During the grain filling stage, the contents of N and P in maize roots and shoots in inoculated plants were considerably higher, which suggests that AM colonization mediates more translocation of N and P during the grain filling stage of host plants [60]. Inoculation of AM fungus with bacteria, i.e., G. mosseae and Rhizobium, increased maize N uptake by AM colonization and nodulation [61]. Thus, it is suggested that both AM fungi and bacteria can play a positive role in maize’s nutrient uptake and availability by mycorrhization and nodulation.
In rice, the mixed AM fungi increased N uptake in the roots and P concentration in the shoots, and resulted in higher growth and yield [62]. He and Dijkstra [63] reported that AM fungi significantly increased N and P concentrations in the roots of rice. In another study, the total 15N uptake of rice was higher in inoculated rice as compared to the control [64]. The AM fungus G. intraradices enhanced the P concentration of rice and increased grain yield and straw biomass by reducing the negative effect of heavy metals under arsenic (As) conditions [65]. Further, it is explained that this is because of the ‘dilution effect’ lowering the As concentrations in the grains due to the higher growth in AM-inoculated plants. In sorghum (sorghum bicolor), the AM fungus Glomus versiforme increased N, P, and K uptake, but there was no effect on carbon: nitrogen: phosphorus (C: N: P) stoichiometry [66]. In comparison to non-inoculated plants, sorghum plants inoculated with G. mosseae showed a higher 59Fe content in shoots under low-nutritional soil conditions; this is due to C4 crops being considered more responsive toward AM colonization than C3 plants [67]. G. etunicatum considerably enhanced P, N, sulfur (S), and molybdenum (Mo) concentrations in the both roots and shoots of sorghum [68]. AM fungi R. irregularis inoculation reduces the growth of sorghum at an early stage, but increases P, Zn, and Fe concentrations in grains and the harvest indices in the mature stage [69]. It may be that AM fungi are more efficient and beneficial at the mature stage as compared to the seedling stage. In oat (Avena sativa) plants, the four mixed AM fungi, i.e., F. mosseae, Gigaspora spp., Claroideoglomus spp., and R. irregularis, were applied as seed coats under fungicides and increased Ca, B, and Cu contents in the roots, but had no significant effect on the P concentration of the host plant [70]. Mixed AM fungi increased P concentrations in shoots of oat plants and increased nutritional levels in sand beach soil [71]. Similarly, the inoculation of nine mixed-AM species increased the growth of oat plants by enhancing N and P uptake in a Mediterranean environment, suggesting that inoculation of AM fungi is a good option for oat crops in a Mediterranean climate to improve agro-ecosystem sustainability [72].
In barley (Hordeum vulgare), inoculation with the AM fungus G. mosseae decreased cadmium (Cd) and cobalt (Co) uptake under conditions of heavy metal (Cd, Co, and Pb)-polluted soil, demonstrating that AM colonization has an alleviating effect on barley under heavy metal conditions [43]. Another study found that R. irregularis boosted Zn uptake in barley plants as compared to non-inoculated plants [73] because AM fungi explore the soil volume beyond the nutrient depletion zone of the roots. AM fungi are in a better position to supply a plant with inorganic soil nutrients such as Zn2+ in higher amounts than found in the plants. Furthermore, another study indicates that the addition of humic acid may improve the performance of AM fungi, as a result, AM fungi may increase zinc absorption and improving plant zinc nutrition indirectly [74]. Under salinity conditions, the AM fungus G. intraradices promoted P, Fe, and Zn uptake in barley plants, while it inhibited the uptake of sodium (Na) in the host plants [75]. In buckwheat (Fagopyrum esculentum), the total N and P absorptions were positively affected by the mixed AM fungi under inorganic and organic P applications [49]. It has been stated that the mixed AM fungi might have a more positive impact on plants; such an example was found when millet (Pennisetum glaucum) plants were treated with mixed AM fungi, which led to higher P, K, Ca, Mg, and Zn absorptions in roots as compared to the controls [76]. Similarly, millet plants inoculated with Emericella rugulosa had higher nutrient levels, especially P in the roots and shoots, and this may be because E. rugulosa produces phosphatases and phytase, which mobilize P and enhance millet plants’ growth and productivity [77]. The application of three AM fungi, i.e., G. mosseae, G. fasciculatum, and G. decipiens, enhanced millet plants’ growth and glomalin-related soil protein (GRSP) under barren soil conditions [78], suggesting that AM fungi contribute to heavy metal sequestration in polluted soils and sediments in semi-arid environments.
Table 2. The role of AM fungal spores in nutrient uptake in different plant stages of cereal plants.
Table 2. The role of AM fungal spores in nutrient uptake in different plant stages of cereal plants.
PlantAM Fungi SporePlant StageNutrient UptakeEnvironmental ConditionsReferences
WheatGlomus speciesTillering stage, heading stageNitrogenUnder ozone
stress conditions
[79]
WheatR. tenuisVegetative stage, fruiting stagePhosphateIn a semi-arid field environment[80]
WheatR. fasciculatus,
F. mosseae
Fruiting stageZincUnder drought stress conditions[55]
WheatR. IntraradicesTillering stageZincUnder P application conditions[81]
MaizeG. mosseae, G. etunicatumTillering stageNitrogenUnder zinc-deficient soil
conditions
[82]
MaizeG. mosseaeVegetative stageNitrogenUnder field conditions[61]
MaizeR. irregularisFruiting stagePhosphorusCompartmented pots with radioactive P tracer conditions[10]
MaizeG. clarumFruiting stagePhosphorusUnder P deficient conditions[36]
RiceR. intraradicesTillering and maturity stagesNitrogen, phosphorus, and carbonUnder experimental greenhouse conditions[39]
RiceGlomus speciesEarly tillering stageNitrogen and phosphorusUnder wetland conditions[83]
RiceG. mosseaeFruiting stageArsenicUnder As soil conditions[84]
RiceG. geosporum,
G. mosseae
Fruiting stagePhosphorusUnder As soil conditions[84]
BarleyG. mosseaeSeedling, flowering, and fruiting stagesZincUnder Cd conditions[85]
BarleyG. intraradicesFruiting stageZincUnder drought and seat stress conditions[86]
SorghumA. scrobiculataHarvesting stageNitrogenUnder greenhouse conditions[87]
SorghumGlomus speciesHarvesting stagePhosphorusUnder greenhouse conditions[87]
SorghumR. irregularisFruiting stagePhosphorusUnder low-phosphorus soil conditions[69]
SorghumG. etunicatum and G. intraradicesFruiting stageZinc, magnesium, and iron
Under micronutrient-deficient conditions[88]
OatG. mosseaeFruiting stageNitrogen and phosphorusUnder nutrient deficient condition[89]
OatR. irregularisFruiting stageMineral nutrition contentUnder conditions of different levels of P[13]
BuckwheatGlomus speciesHarvesting stagePhosphorusUnder low to medium soil pH conditions[49]
BuckwheatGlomus speciesHarvesting stageNitrogenUnder low to medium soil pH conditions[49]
QuinoaG. mosseaeFruiting stageCesiumUnder loamy sand conditions[50]
QuinoaG. mosseaeFruiting stageNitrogenUnder conditions of different nitrogen levels[51]
MilletG. mosseaeFruiting stageNitrogenUnder experimental pot conditions[52]
MilletG. mosseaeFruiting stagePhosphorusUnder experimental pot conditions[52]
MilletG. mosseaeFruiting stageN, P, and KUnder cow dung (CD) or poultry manure (PM) conditions[90]

3. AM Fungi and Photosynthetic Activity of Cereal Crops

AM fungi inoculation has been reported to influence photosynthetic parameters, i.e., chlorophyll-a (Chl-a), chlorophyll-b (Chl-b), carotenoids (Caro), and the SPAD value. AM fungi increase photosynthetic activity, regulate stomatal conductivity, and enhance tolerance against various stress conditions, resulting in increased plant growth (Figure 2). AM fungi were reported to increase the photosynthesis rate in wheat, maize, and rice by facilitating the uptake of N and P from the soil. Beltrano and Ronco [33] and Peterson et al. [91] reported that wheat inoculated with AM fungi showed higher chlorophyll contents as compared to non-inoculated plants under drought stress conditions. Further, the AM fungus F. mosseae increased photosynthetic activity and mitigated the negative effects of environmental stressors on wheat growing in salty soil [31]. AM fungi were reported to protect the water splitting complex followed by enhancing the primary photochemistry of photosystem-II (PSII) under high temperatures. The leaf area and photosynthetic rate (Pn) of maize plants were positively influenced by two AM fungi species, G. mosseae and G. intraradices [37]. Compared to non-inoculated plants, G. etunicatum improved maize chlorophyll content and Pn by up to 29% [36]. This is because AM fungi positively influence the P content of maize, which, in turn, influences a variety of physiological processes, including photosynthesis. Similarly, the AM fungus Glomus tortuosum improved physiological metabolisms by increasing the chlorophyll content, light energy utilization efficiency, gas exchange, and rubisco activity of maize under salinity stress conditions [92]. This suggest that AM fungi could mitigate the growth limitations caused by salinity stress and hence play a very important role in promoting the photosynthetic capacity of maize under salt stress.
AM fungi inoculation increased photosynthesis as well as soluble carbohydrates in rice plants; this is because AM fungi improved the efficiency of PSII photochemistry as compared to the non-inoculated plants [93]. AM fungi were observed to enhance photosynthetic activities in barley plants [94]. According to Achatz et al. [95], enhanced AM colonization leads to early plant development and higher phosphate supply, resulting in a very positive influence on the photosynthesis and stomatal conductivity of barley plants. An additional study found that AM fungi had a favorable influence on rubisco and PSII in barley, and thus improved its tolerance against salt and drought stress [96,97]. AM fungi favorably interact with plants and other microorganism to increase plants’ N uptake, resulting in increased photosynthesis rates and growth in various plants including sorghum [98]. Under drought stress conditions, AM fungi boosted agro-physiological characteristics, including photosynthesis and grain production, in sorghum plants by supplying more water and increasing water use efficiency [99]. This might be because AM fungi improved the roots’ capacity to absorb soil moisture, which kept the stomata open in the leaves and increased dry matter production. Water conductivity improvement may also be due to an increase in root surface area for water and P absorption, as well as improved osmoregulation provided by AM fungi and rhizobacteria in the soil. In the context of quinoa plants inoculated with AM fungi (G. mosseae and Glomus tortuosum), the results showed a considerable increase in chlorophyll content, as well as PSII photochemical efficiency [100]. AM fungi assisted N uptake in quinoa, which is associated with high enzymatic activity leading to a higher chlorophyll content and photosynthetic activity [100]. When millet plants were inoculated with Glomus fasciculatum under salt conditions, the total chlorophyll content and plant growth were significantly increased due to positive changes in antioxidant enzymatic activities [101]. Additionally, the role of AM fungi in cereal crops regarding photosynthesis has been thoroughly researched; in the context of AM fungi, some plants, such as buckwheat, quinoa, and millet, required further exploration. Nonetheless, a thorough study and understanding of the deep mechanisms of photosynthesis are require further investigation.

4. AM Fungi with Primary and Secondary Metabolites

AM fungi are essential for the beneficial enhancement of primary and secondary metabolites, which are required for plant development, enzymatic activities, and other processes, including stress tolerance (Figure 3). AM fungi increase water and nutrient absorption, recalibrate the metabolic pathways of plants, and affect the concentration of primary and secondary metabolites [1]. The studies by Pepe et al. [20] and Ryan et al. [21] showed that some essential phytochemicals (phenolic acids, flavones, and phytic acid) belonging to secondary metabolites were higher in cereal plants under AM fungi inoculation. The concentrations of phytochemicals such as alkaloids, terpenoids, flavonoids, and organic compounds were also reported to be higher in AM-inoculated plants [22,23,24]. AM fungi also increase the photosynthetic rate by activating the primary and secondary metabolomic biosynthesis pathways via changes in phytohormonal concentrations and creating signaling molecules [60]. According to Bowles et al. [102], AM fungi improved nutrient uptake, especially of N and P, which is associated with increased enzymatic activity, leading to increased synthesis of primary and secondary metabolites. Talaat and Shawky [103] reported that AM fungi had a significant impact on the Membrane Stability Index (MSI), photochemical reactions during photosynthesis, carbohydrates, and soluble protein in two wheat cultivars (cv. Sids 1 and cv. Giza 168). Another study found that AM fungi increased proline biosynthesis and 9-cis-epoxycarotenoid dioxygenase (nced) activity in wheat, increased protein synthesis, and sped up the metabolic processes of the plants, resulting in higher anti-oxidative reactions and immune responses, which lead to increased tolerance against abiotic stresses in plants [104]. These results suggested that AM fungi may potentially have a role in the synthesis of essential plant hormones such as abscisic acid. The AM fungus F. mosseae alleviated the negative effect of heavy metals, promoted lipid production, and increased carbohydrate concentrations in wheat, which showed higher Performance Index (PI) values under Cd conditions [105,106]. By enhancing the amino acid biosynthesis pathway, AM fungi in combination with plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) improved sugar, starch, and galactose metabolism in wheat and barley plants [72]. Similarly, AM fungi improved soil fertility and increased tolerance against different environmental stresses, which have positive effects on both the quantity and quality of the secondary metabolites [16]. G. intraradices promoted the concentration of glucose and glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate, while G. mosseae, G. intraradices, and G. rosea increased the levels of cyclohexanone and its derivatives, which lead to higher secondary metabolites (Table 3). Higher AM colonization was reported to increase flavonoid, iso-flavonoid, phenolic, triterpenoid, cinnamic acid amide, and Apo-carotenoid accumulation in the roots and shoots of barley [107].
AM fungi were reported to mediate the production of organic acids such as oxalic, malonic, fumaric, malic, citric, and T-aconitic in maize roots through the seed coating [108]. AM fungi significantly increased antioxidant enzymes and antioxidant activity in oat leaves, and increased tolerance against abiotic stress conditions [109]. In another study, AM fungi colonization effectively counteracted sulfur dioxide (SO2)-induced alterations, increased the photosynthetic rate, maintained Superoxide dismutase (SOD) activity, and increased catalase (CAT) activity in oats under salt stress condition [110]. Plants cultivated in Arabian medium crude oil (ACO) with the AM fungus, i.e., Glomus intraradices, had a considerably improved degradation of ACO, but there were no variations in proline, total phenolic, nitrate reductase levels, or plant–gas exchange [111].
AM fungi stimulated plant metabolism and homeostasis by increasing dehydrogenase (DH) activity in oat, which is involved in the synthesis of nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate (NADPH) and nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NADH); both are involved in plant homeostasis against different stresses [112]. When sorghum plants were exposed to varying levels of chromium (Cr) stress, the plant tolerance increased due to higher antioxidant enzyme activity and primary metabolites under AM fungi inoculation [113]. Similarly, in another study, AM fungi were discovered to protect plants from oxidative stress by boosting antioxidant enzymatic activity in sorghum [114]. Furthermore, under Fe deficiency, AM fungi improved the enzymatic pathways that inhibit oxidation and enhanced secondary metabolites in sorghum [115,116]. Two AM fungi, i.e., G. mosseae and G. tortuosum, increased soluble sugar and proline content, as well as enzymatic activity, in quinoa, but decreased these when high N was applied. It is suggested that AM fungi could perform better under medium-N application [51]. In quinoa plants, the concentrations of natural lipid fatty acids (NLFAs) and phospholipid fatty acids (PLFAs) were higher than in wheat, millet, and sorghum in bulk soil under AM inoculation [117]. The soluble sugar, proline, and flavonoid contents were found to be higher with the AM fungus R. intraradices in millet plants [118]. In another experiment, it was shown that F. mosseae increased the primary metabolomics, including fatty acids and enzymatic activities, of millet plants in contrast to non-inoculated plants [119]. In the same report, another AM fungus, R. intraradices, was shown to increase the concentration of benzenoids, phenols, and flavonoids in millet, suggesting that AM fungi facilitate the production of secondary metabolites. In most cases, AM symbioses promote the accumulation of primary and secondary metabolites in many plants, including cereals, which have a positive effect on plant growth and development. To expand understanding in this area, studies with many other plants should be conducted; in the case of cereal, the use of nitrogen-fixing bacteria in combination with AM fungi aiming to optimize the synthesis of bioactive chemicals should also be investigated.
Table 3. The role of AM fungal spores in improving primary and secondary metabolites in different cereal plants.
Table 3. The role of AM fungal spores in improving primary and secondary metabolites in different cereal plants.
PlantAM Fungi SporePrimary MetabolitesSecondary MetabolitesEnvironmental ConditionsReferences
WheatGlomus speciesProline and glycinebetaine_Under salt stress conditions[105]
WheatMix-AMFγ-amino butyric acid_Under rainfed field conditions[72]
WheatF. mosseaeAmino acid (3-phospho-hydroxypyruvate) and carbohydrates (mannosylfructose-phosphate)Flavonoids, terpenoids, and staurosporine (alkaloids)Under water stress conditions[120]
WheatF. Mosseae, C. claroideum_Production of phenolic compoundsUnder drought stress conditions[121]
MaizeR. intraradices, F. mosseae,
F. geosporum
Carbohydrates and photosynthates_Under high-temperature stress conditions[122]
MaizeG. albida, C. etunicatum, A. longulaTotal proteinsPhenols and tanninsUnder experimental greenhouse conditions[123]
MaizeGlomus speciesCarbohydrate, leaf soluble sugar, and proline content_Under different temperature stress conditions[30]
MaizeMix-AMFProtein levels_Under field conditions[124]
RiceG. etunicatum, G. geosporum, G. mosseaeCyanidin-3-glucoside and peonidin-3-glucoside_Under salt stress conditions[125]
RiceGlomus speciesFatty acids, amino acids,
and carotenoids
TerpenoidsUnder Cd soil conditions[126]
BarleyG. intraradicesGlucose and glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate_Under feeding experimental conditions[127]
BarleyG. mosseae, G. intraradices, G. rosea_Cyclohexenone and its derivativesPot greenhouse experimental conditions[128]
BarleyG. intraradices_Hydroxycinnamic acid amides, yclohexenone derivatives, and blumeninUnder defined nutritional medium conditions[129]
SorghumG. mosseae, G. intraradicesOctadecane, pentaethylene glycol, acetic acid, and pentaethylene glycol_Under volatile organic compound (VOC) conditions[130]
SorghumMix-AMF_Anthocyanin, polyphenols, and flavonoidsUnder drought stress conditions[131]
SorghumGlomus speciesGlucose, fatty acids, and methionineFerulic acid and phenolic compounds, 3,4-dihydroxycinnamic acidUnder marginal soil conditions[132]
OatR. irregularisAscorbic acid and glutathione content_Under sulfur dioxide (SO2) exposure conditions[111]
OatG. intraradices_Terpenoid glycoside and phenolic compoundsUnder defined nutritional medium condition[133]
OatG. intraradices_Sesquiterpenoid cyclohexenone derivativesUnder defined nutritional medium conditions[134]
OatG. intraradicesFree amino acids and proteins_Under N application conditions[135]
BuckwheatGlomus species_Flavonoid contentUnder UV-B radiation conditions[136]
BuckwheatMix-AMFCarbohydrates_Under greenhouse conditions[47]
BuckwheatMix-AMFFatty acids_Under temperate agricultural soil conditions[119]
QuinoaG. mosseaeSoluble sugar_Under conditions of different nitrogen levels[51]
QuinoaMix-AMFNatural lipids_Under temperate agricultural soil conditions[119]
QuinoaMix-AMF_Polyphenol compoundsUnder salt stress conditions[137]
MilletR. intraradices_Benzenoid, phenol, and flavonoid contentUnder sandy loam soil conditions[121]
MilletF. mosseaeFatty acids_Under sandy clay loam conditions[121]
MilletR. intraradicesProline and soluble sugar contentPhenol and flavonoid contentUnder drought stress conditions[120]
_ indicates that no result is available in the study.

5. The Roles of AM Fungi in Grain Yield and the Quality of Cereal Crops

AM fungi G. intraradices and G. mosseae with Trichoderma atroviride improved wheat grain productivity by 32.1 and 8.3%, respectively. AM fungi alter micronutrient availability and absorption of N, P, and other micronutrients at grain filling stage, resulting higher protein concentration and enhanced cereal crop quality and quantity [138]. In two wheat cultivars, i.e., Brookton and Krichauf, AM plants produced a lower grain yield per plant without the addition of P, while the addition of P positively affected grain yield, and the cultivar Brookton was more efficient in the case of grain weight as compared to Krichauf in highly calcareous soil [139]. Generally, it is concluded that AM fungal colonization increases P absorption by the AM pathway, which improves resource accumulation and promotes flowering initiation [140]. This influence may, in turn, contribute to increased reproductive success since early flowering leads to a higher number of flowers (and therefore grain) [74]. In maize, G. intraradices increased the silage yield, as well as the green and dry matter yield, under both irrigated and non-irrigated conditions; AM fungi strengthen the plants’ ability to increase their tolerance to biotic and abiotic stress conditions under high- and low-humidity conditions [141]. Similarly, AM fungi and Azotobacter chrocoocum facilitated N and P uptake during the fruiting stage and enhanced the cob weight, length, grain weight, and starch content of maize [142]. Rice plants treated with F. mosseae, Acaulospora laevis, and Gigaspora margarita improved spikelet fertility (%), and rice productivity by 125% and 143%, respectively, under salt treatments [143]. At the mature stage, the inoculated rice allocated more nutrients to reproductive parts as compared to the non-inoculated plants and had 18.4% increase in grain weight. However, AM fungi inoculation had no significant effect on the contribution of C or N translocation to seeds, which may be the result of the simultaneous increase in sink potential under inoculation. Furthermore, the 100-seed weight was also reduced by 4.0%, while the panicle number was increased by 26.1%; as a result, the grain yield was increased by 28.2% in rice compared to the control treatment [39]. Barley plants treated with R. irregularis had improved grain yields and biochemical characteristics of seeds due to the boosting of Zn concentrations and starch content in two cultivars [29]. Similarly, the use of five AM fungi, Pacispora franciscana, F. mosseae, F. geosporum, R. irregularis, and Glomus tenebrosum, boosted barley kernel weight and grain production by 90% and 68%, respectively. The levels of K, Cu, Fe, Zn, and Ca in grain were likewise significantly greater in inoculated plants, whereas the Na content in grain was lower [144]. The sorghum cultivars (Ajabsido-MNO9-7018, Macia-PRO9110-4319, and Sureno (Latin American; PRO9110-4317)) produced 285 % more grain/plants under AM inoculation since it has been observed that AM colonization allocates available nutrients to grain rather than vegetative biomass (harvest index) [145]. Furthermore, G. mosseae increased the grain yield by 27% and significantly improved the agronomic characteristics of sorghum plants under drought stress condition [101]. AM fungus R. irregularis was applied to sorghum plants resulting in the accumulation of higher amounts of P, Zn, and Fe in the grain, which resulted in higher yield and harvest indices as compared to non-inoculated plants [73]. The plant growth and yield of oat plants increased when barley and rye (Secale cereal) crops were recycled with AM fungi in the cropping system, suggesting that a low-input cropping system with the application of AM fungi could increase oat yield and productivity [146]. In another study, after 45 days of treatment with mixed-AM fungi, oat plant ‘variety Pepita’ performed better than oat ‘variety Supernova’ in terms of growth and yield production in a field experiment held in Southern Chile [147]. In combination with Azotobacter chroococcum and Trichoderma harzianum, the AM fungus Acaulophora laevis showed 95% higher colonization and increased herbage yield of Buckwheat plants, demonstrating that AM fungi are environmentally friendly with other microorganisms and facilitate higher yields and productivity [48]. In the same study, large flower clusters, herbage yields, the number of seeds per cyme, the maximum harvest index, and seed yields were higher in buckwheat under AM fungi application. In quinoa, the addition of organic compost inoculated with mixed-AM fungi led to increases in dry weight, grain production, and nutritional quality under drought stress [148]. Furthermore, quinoa treated with G. mosseae had increased plant shoot growth, but it had no significant effect on yield [51]. Two AM fungi, i.e., Rhizophagus fasciculatus and Ambispora leptoticha, in combination with PGPR bacteria (Pseudomonas) increased grain yields more effectively than single inoculation, suggesting that the application of AM fungi and PGPR bacteria together could boost millet plant growth and productivity [149]. When mixed commercial AM fungi were treated with SWSC (solid waste-based soil conditioner), AM colonization rates rose up to 81%, resulting in higher millet growth and yield compared to the control [150]. Moreover, the hyphae of the AM fungus C. etunicatum extended throughout a 12 cm soil layer, absorbing more nutrients and resulting in higher growth, revealing that the AM fungus has the potential to boost millet yield and productivity [151]. The majority of the research has claimed that AM fungi have good impacts on grain yield and quality, while only few studies have shown that AM fungi have a detrimental effect on grain yield and quality. In addition, the roles of many AM fungus spores are unknown; as a result, this is an opportunity for researchers to learn more about the impact of various and distinct AM fungal spores on cereal crops.

6. Conclusions

Arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungi have many roles in various developmental processes in plants, especially in cereals. AM fungi have an effect on nutrient availability and uptake, increase the photosynthetic rate, improve antioxidant activities, and increase tolerance against environmental stress. Moreover, AM fungi have a positive impact on both the primary and secondary metabolites and also increase growth, yield, and productivity. AM fungi are utilized in greenhouses and on a smaller scale in agricultural systems, but it is possible that they may also be used on a larger scale. However, there are a higher number of AM fungi spores and the function of each group or each spore in different crops is still unknown. More studies are required to investigate the role and function of AM fungi spores in numerous plants, particularly cereal crops. In addition, the molecular processes and genetic aspects of each species should be researched in order to have a better understanding of the distinctions in the functions that are present in different AM fungi species. Plants such as oat and barley plants should be more thoroughly investigated under AM conditions to provide more knowledge about the effects of AM fungi on these plants since there has not been much study on these plants in relation to AM symbiosis.

Author Contributions

Y.K. combined all the data and wrote the first draft; S.S. helped in finding the relevant literature; the manuscript was revised by H.T. All the authors agreed with the final manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work is supported by the National Key R&D Program of China (2021YFD1900700) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant number 31972497).

Acknowledgments

The authors express their gratitude to the College of Natural Resource and Environment for providing excellent research facilities.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Khan, Y.; Yang, X.; Zhang, X.; Yaseen, T.; Shi, L.; Zhang, T. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi promote plant growth of Leymus chinensis (Trin.) Tzvelev by increasing the metabolomics activity under nitrogen addition. Grassl. Sci. 2021, 67, 128–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Parniske, M. Arbuscular mycorrhiza: The mother of plant root endosymbioses. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2008, 6, 763–775. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Zhou, Q.; Ravnskov, S.; Jiang, D.; Wollenweber, B. Changes in carbon and nitrogen allocation, growth and grain yield induced by arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) subjected to a period of water deficit. Plant Growth Regul. 2015, 75, 751–760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Saboor, A.; Ali, M.A.; Hussain, S.; El Enshasy, H.A.; Hussain, S.; Ahmed, N.; Datta, R. Zinc nutrition and arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis effects on maize (Zea mays L.) growth and productivity. Saudi J. Biol. Sci. 2021, 28, 6339–6351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Bernaola, L.; Cange, G.; Way, M.O.; Gore, J.; Hardke, J.; Stout, M. Natural colonization of rice by arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in different production areas. Rice Sci. 2018, 25, 169–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Douds, D.D.; Lee, J.; Rogers, L.; Lohman, M.E.; Pinzon, N.; Ganser, S. Utilization of inoculum of AMfungi producedon-farm for the production of Capsicum annuum: A summary of seven years of field trials on a conventional vegetable farm. Biol. Agric. Hortic. 2012, 28, 129–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Gaur, A.; Adholeya, A.; Mukerji, K.G. On-farm production of VAM inoculum and vegetable crops in marginal soil amended with organic matter. Trop. Agric. 2000, 77, 21–26. [Google Scholar]
  8. Wertheim, F.; Douds, D.; Handley, D.; Hutton, M. Evaluating the potential of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi to boost yields in field-grown leeks. J. NACAA 2014, 7, 1. [Google Scholar]
  9. Khan, Y.; Sohail, A.; Yaseen, T.; Rehman, K.U.; Noor, M.; Akbar, K. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi improved the growth and yield productivity of lens esculenta under the influence of poultry litter. Pak. J. Phytopathol. 2021, 33, 145–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Battini, F.; Grønlund, M.; Agnolucci, M.; Giovannetti, M.; Jakobsen, I. Facilitation of phosphorus uptake in maize plants by mycorrhizosphere bacteria. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 4686. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Smith, S.E.; Read, D.J. Mineral nutrition, toxic element accumulation and water relations of arbuscular mycorrhizal plants. In Mycorrhizal Symbiosis; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2008; pp. 145–148. [Google Scholar]
  12. Mei, L.; Yang, X.; Cao, H.; Zhang, T.; Guo, J. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi alter plant and soil C: N: P stoichiometries under warming and nitrogen input in a semiarid meadow of China. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2019, 16, 397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Mustafa, G.; Randoux, B.; Tisserant, B.; Fontaine, J.; Magnin-Robert, M.; Sahraoui, A.L.H.; Reignault, P. Phosphorus supply, arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal species, and plant genotype impact on the protective efficacy of mycorrhizal inoculation against wheat powdery mildew. Mycorrhiza 2016, 26, 685–697. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Cao, J.; Wang, C.; Huang, Y. Interactive impacts of earthworms (Eisenia fetida) and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (Funneliformis mosseae) on the bioavailability of calcium phosphates. Plant Soil 2015, 396, 45–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Miransari, M. Soil microbes and the availability of soil nutrients. Acta Physiol. Plant. 2013, 35, 3075–3084. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Frew, A.; Powell, J.R.; Glauser, G.; Bennett, A.E.; Johnson, S.N. Mycorrhizal fungi enhance nutrient uptake but disarm defences in plant roots, promoting plant-parasitic nematode populations. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2018, 126, 123–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Smith, S.E.; Smith, F.A. Roles of arbuscular mycorrhizas in plant nutrition and growth: New paradigms from cellular to ecosystem scales. Biol. Annu. Rev. Plant 2011, 62, 227–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Tariq, M.; Iqbal, H. Maize in Pakistan–an overview. Agric. Nat. Resour. 2010, 44, 757–763. [Google Scholar]
  19. Smith, S.E.; Gianinazzi-Pearson, V. Physiological interactions between symbionts in vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizal plants. Annu. Rev. Plant physiol. Plant Mol. Biol. 1988, 39, 221–244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Pepe, A.; Giovannetti, M.; Sbrana, C. Lifespan and functionality of mycorrhizal fungal mycelium are uncoupled from host plant lifespan. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 10235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Ryan, M.H.; Angus, J.F. Arbuscular mycorrhizae in wheat and field pea crops on a low P soil: Increased Zn-uptake but no increase in P-uptake or yield. Plant Soil 2003, 250, 225–239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Latz, M.A.; Jensen, B.; Collinge, D.B.; Jørgensen, H.J. Endophytic fungi as biocontrol agents: Elucidating mechanisms in disease suppression. Plant Ecol. Divers. 2018, 11, 555–567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Card, S.; Johnson, L.; Teasdale, S.; Caradus, J. Deciphering endophyte behaviour: The link between endophyte biology and efficacious biological control agents. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 2016, 92, fiw114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Kaddes, A.; Fauconnier, M.L.; Sassi, K.; Nasraoui, B.; Jijakli, M.H. Endophytic fungal volatile compounds as solution for sustainable agriculture. Molecules 2019, 24, 1065. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  25. Kulkarni, S.; Goswami, A. Effect of Excess Fertilizers and Nutrients: A Review on Impact on Plants and Human Population. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Sustainable Computing in Science, Technology and Management (SUSCOM), Jaipur, India, 26–28 February 2019. [Google Scholar]
  26. Rejeb, I.; Pastor, V.; Mauch-Mani, B. Plant responses to simultaneous biotic and abiotic stress: Molecular mechanisms. Plants 2014, 3, 458–475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Ganugi, P.; Masoni, A.; Pietramellara, G.; Benedettelli, S. A Review of Studies from the Last Twenty Years on Plant–Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi Associations and Their Uses for Wheat Crops. Agronomy 2019, 9, 840. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Khan, A.; Sharif, M.; Ali, A.; Shah, S.N.M.; Mian, I.A.; Wahid, F.; Ali, N. Potential of AM fungi in phytoremediation of heavy metals and effect on yield of wheat crop. Am. J. Plant Sci. 2014, 5, 1578–1586. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Al-Mutairi, A.A.; Cavagnaro, T.R.; Khor, S.F.; Neumann, K.; Burton, R.A.; Watts-Williams, S.J. The effect of zinc fertilization and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi on grain quality and yield of contrasting barley cultivars. Funct. Plant Biol. 2020, 47, 122–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Zhu, X.; Song, F.; Liu, F. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and tolerance of temperature stress in plants. In Arbuscular Mycorrhizas and Stress Tolerance of Plants; Springer: Singapore, 2017; pp. 163–194. [Google Scholar]
  31. Abdel-Fattah, G.M.; Asrar, A.A. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal application to improve growth and tolerance of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) plants grown in saline soil. Acta Physiol. Plant. 2012, 34, 267–277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Ibrahim, A.H.; Abdel-Fattah, G.M.; Eman, F.M.; Abd El_Aziz, M.H.; Shohr, A.E. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and spermine alleviate the adverse effects of salinity stress on electrolyte leakage and productivity of wheat plants. New Phytol. 2011, 51, 261–276. [Google Scholar]
  33. Beltrano, J.; Ronco, M. Improved tolerance of wheat plants (Triticum aestivum L.) to drought stress and rewatering by the arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus Glomus claroideum: Effect on growth and cell membrane stability. Braz. J. Plant Physiol. 2008, 20, 29–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Mathur, S.; Tomar, R.S.; Jajoo, A. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) protects photosynthetic apparatus of wheat under drought stress. Photosynth. Res. 2018, 139, 227–238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Ghorchiani, M.; Etesami, H.; Alikhani, H.A. Improvement of growth and yield of maize under water stress by co-inoculating an arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus and a plant growth promoting rhizobacterium together with phosphate fertilizers. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2018, 258, 59–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Almagrabi, O.A.; Abdelmoneim, T.S. Using of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi to reduce the deficiency effect of phosphorous fertilization on maize plants (Zea mays L.). Life Sci. J. 2012, 9, 1648–1654. [Google Scholar]
  37. Amerian, M.R.; Stewart, W.S.; Griffiths, H. Effect of two species of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi on growth, assimilation and leaf water relations in maize (Zea mays). Asp. Appl. Biol. 2001, 63, 71–76. [Google Scholar]
  38. Merlos, M.A.; Zitka, O.; Vojtech, A.; Azcón-Aguilar, C.; Ferrol, N. The arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus Rhizophagus irregularis differentially regulates the copper response of two maize cultivars differing in copper tolerance. Plant Sci. 2016, 253, 68–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Zhang, X.; Wang, L.; Ma, F.; Yang, J.; Su, M. Effects of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi inoculation on carbon and nitrogen distribution and grain yield and nutritional quality in rice (Oryza sativa L.). J. Sci. Food Agric. 2017, 97, 2919–2925. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Porcel, R.; Redondo-Gómez, S.; Mateos-Naranjo, E.; Aroca, R.; Garcia, R.; Ruiz-Lozano, J.M. Arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis ameliorates the optimum quantum yield of photosystem II and reduces non-photochemical quenching in rice plants subjected to salt stress. J. Plant physiol. 2015, 185, 75–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Symanczik, S.; Lehmann, M.F.; Wiemken, A.; Boller, T.; Courty, P.-E. Effects of two contrasted arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal isolates on nutrient uptake by Sorghum bicolor under drought. Mycorrhiza 2018, 28, 779–785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Gworgwor, N.A.; Weber, H.C. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi-parasite-host interaction for the control of Striga hermonthica (Del.) Benth. in sorghum [Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench]. Mycorrhiza 2003, 13, 277–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Watts-Williams, M.; Ardakani, M.R.; Rejali, F.; Zaefarian, F.; Teimouri, S.; Noormohammadi, G.; Miransari, M. Uptake of heavy metals by mycorrhizal barley (Hordeum vulgare L.). J. Plant Nutr. 2015, 38, 904–919. [Google Scholar]
  44. Watts-Williams, S.J.; Cavagnaro, T.R. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi increase grain zinc concentration and modify the expression of root ZIP transporter genes in a modern barley (Hordeum vulgare) cultivar. Plant Sci. 2018, 274, 163–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Plenchette, C.; Fortin, J.A.; Furlan, V. Growth responses of several plant species to mycorrhizae in a soil of moderate P-fertility. Plant Soil 1983, 70, 199–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Jannoura, R.; Joergensen, R.G.; Bruns, C. Organic fertilizer effects on growth, crop yield, and soil microbial biomass indices in sole and intercropped peas and oats under organic farming conditions. Eur. J. Agron. 2014, 52, 259–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Zhao, J.; Zhong, L.; Zou, L.; Zhang, C.; Peng, L.; Xiao, W.; Zhao, G. Efficient promotion of the sprout growth and rutin production of tartary buckwheat by associated fungal endophytes. Cereal Res. Commun. 2014, 42, 401–412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Tummaramatti, S.; Hegde, L.; Vijaykumar, N. Pot experiment: Studies on effect of bio-fertilizers on Buckwheat (Fagopyrum esculentum Moench). Ecol. Environ. Conserv. 2016, 22, S55–S58. [Google Scholar]
  49. Boglaienko, D.; Soti, P.; Shetty, K.G.; Jayachandran, K. Buckwheat as a cover crop in Florida: Mycorrhizal Status and soil analysis. Agroecol. Sustain. Food Syst. 2014, 38, 1033–1046. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Vinichuk, M.; Mårtensson, A.; Ericsson, T.; Rosén, K. Effect of arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungi on 137Cs uptake by plants grown on different soils. J. Environ. Radioact. 2013, 115, 151–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Yang, S.; Pang, C.; Zhang, Y.; Hua, Y.; He, X.; Yang, Y. Growth and physiological characteristics of quinoa inoculated with arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi under different nitrogen levels. Acta Bot. Boreali-Occidentalia Sin. 2017, 37, 1323–1330. [Google Scholar]
  52. Ramakrishnan, K.; Bhuvaneswari, G. Effect of inoculation of am fungi and beneficial microorganisms on growth and nutrient uptake of Eleusine coracana (L.) Gaertn. (Finger millet). Int. Lett. Nat. Sci. 2014, 13, 59–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Channabasava, A.; Lakshman, H.C.; Jorquera, M.A. Effect of fungicides on association of arbuscular mycorrhiza fungus Rhizophagus fasciculatus and growth of Proso millet (Panicum miliaceum L.). J. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr. 2015, 15, 35–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Mardukhi, B.; Rejali, F.; Daei, G.; Ardakani, M.R.; Malakouti, M.J.; Miransari, M. Arbuscular mycorrhizas enhance nutrient uptake in different wheat genotypes at high salinity levels under field and greenhouse conditions. C. R. Biol. 2011, 334, 564–571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Pellegrino, E.; Opik, M.; Bonari, E.; Ercoli, L. Responses of wheat to arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi: A meta-analysis of field studies from 1975 to 2013. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2015, 84, 210–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Schweiger, P.F.; Jakobsen, I. Direct measurement of arbuscular mycorrhizal phosphorus uptake into field-grown winter wheat. J. Agron. 1999, 91, 998–1002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Dai, M.; Hamel, C.; Bainard, L.D.; Arnaud, M.S.; Grant, C.A.; Lupwayi, N.Z.; Lemke, R. Negative and positive contributions of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal taxa to wheat production and nutrient uptake efficiency in organic and conventional systems in the Canadian prairie. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2014, 74, 156–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Graham, J.H.; Abbott, L.K. Wheat responses to aggressive and non-aggressive arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. Plant Soil 2000, 220, 207–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Subramanian, K.S.; Tenshia, V.; Jayalakshmi, K.; Ramach, V. Role of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus (Glomus intraradices) (fungus aided) in zinc nutrition of maize. J. Agric. Biotech. Sustain. Dev. 2009, 1, 029–038. [Google Scholar]
  60. Azaizeh, H.A.; Marschner, H.; Römheld, V.; Wittenmayer, L. Effects of a vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus and other soil microorganisms on growth, mineral nutrient acquisition and root exudation of soil-grown maize plants. Mycorrhiza 1995, 5, 321–327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Meng, L.; Zhang, A.; Wang, F.; Han, X.; Wang, D.; Li, S. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and rhizobium facilitate nitrogen uptake and transfer in soybean/maize intercropping system. Front. Plant Sci. 2015, 6, 339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Chareesri, A.; De Deyn, G.B.; Sergeeva, L.; Polthanee, A.; Kuyper, T.W. Increased arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal colonization reduces yield loss of rice (Oryza sativa L.) under drought. Mycorrhiza 2020, 30, 315–328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. He, M.; Dijkstra, F.A. Drought effect on plant nitrogen and phosphorus: A meta-analysis. New Phytol. 2014, 204, 924–931. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Li, Y.; Ran, W.; Zhang, R.; Sun, S.; Xu, G. Facilitated legume nodulation, phosphate uptake and nitrogen transfer by arbuscular inoculation in an upland rice and mung bean intercropping system. Plant Soil 2009, 315, 285–296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Li, H.; Ye, Z.H.; Chan, W.F.; Chen, X.W.; Wu, F.Y.; Wu, S.C.; Wong, M.H. Can arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi improve grain yield, As uptake and tolerance of rice grown under aerobic conditions? Environ. Pollut. 2011, 159, 2537–2545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Guo, W.; Zhao, R.; Zhao, W.; Fu, R.; Guo, J.; Bi, N.; Zhang, J. Effects of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi on maize (Zea mays L.) and sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L. Moench) grown in rare earth elements of mine tailings. Appl. Soil Ecol. 2013, 72, 85–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Caris, C.; Hördt, W.; Hawkins, H.J.; Römheld, V.; George, E. Studies of iron transport by arbuscular mycorrhizal hyphae from soil to peanut and sorghum plants. Mycorrhiza 1998, 8, 35–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Shi, Z.; Zhang, J.; Lu, S.; Li, Y.; Wang, F. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi improve the performance of sweet sorghum grown in a mo-contaminated soil. J. Fungi 2020, 6, 44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Watts-Williams, S.J.; Gill, A.R.; Jewell, N.; Brien, C.J.; Berger, B.; Tran, B.T.; Cavagnaro, T.R. Enhancement of sorghum grain yield and nutrition: A role for arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi regardless of soil phosphorus availability. Plants People Planet 2022, 4, 143–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Cameron, J.C.; Lehman, R.M.; Sexton, P.; Osborne, S.L.; Taheri, W.I. Fungicidal seed coatings exert minor effects on arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and plant nutrient content. Agron. J. 2017, 109, 1005–1012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Will, M.E.; Sylvia, D.M. Interaction of rhizosphere bacteria, fertilizer, and vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi with sea oats. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1990, 56, 2073–2079. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Saia, S.; Ruisi, P.; Amato, G.; Di, M.G.; Frenda, A.S.; Giambalvo, D. Effects of soil inoculation with arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi on plant growth and nutrient uptake of some Mediterranean species grown under rainfed field conditions. Nitrogen Workshop 2012. In Proceedings of the 17th International Nitrogen Workshop, Wexford, Ireland, 26–29 June 2012; pp. 90–91. [Google Scholar]
  73. Watts-Williams, S.J.; Nguyen, T.D.; Kabiri, S.; Losic, D.; McLaughlin, M.J. Potential of zinc-loaded graphene oxide and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi to improve the growth and zinc nutrition of Hordeum vulgare and Medicago truncatula. Appl. Soil Ecol. 2020, 150, 103464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Maji, D.; Misra, P.; Singh, S.; Kalra, A. Humic acid rich vermicompost promotes plant growth by improving microbial community structure of soil as well as root nodulation and mycorrhizal colonization in the roots of Pisum sativum. Appl. Soil Ecol. 2017, 110, 97–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Mohammad, M.J.; Malkawi, H.I.; Shibli, R. Effects of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and phosphorus fertilization on growth and nutrient uptake of barley grown on soils with different levels of salts. J. Plant Nutr. 2003, 26, 125–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Bagayoko, M.; George, E.; Römheld, V.; Buerkert, A. Effects of mycorrhizae and phosphorus on growth and nutrient uptake of millet, cowpea and sorghum on a West African soil. J. Agric. Sci. 2000, 135, 399–407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Yadav, B.K.; Tarafdar, J.C. Ability of Emericella rugulosa to mobilize unavailable P compounds during Pearl millet [Pennisetum glaucum (L.) R. Br.] crop under arid condition. Ind. J. Microbiol. 2007, 47, 57–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Pal, A.; Pandey, S. Symbiosis of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and Pennisetum glaucum l. improves plant growth and glomalin-related soil protein in barren soil. Int. J. Sci. Invent. Today 2017, 6, 783–792. [Google Scholar]
  79. Cui, X.C.; Hu, J.L.; Lin, X.G.; Wang, F.Y.; Chen, R.R.; Wang, J.H.; Zhu, J.G. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi alleviate ozone stress on nitrogen nutrition of field wheat. J. Agric. Sci. Technol. 2013, 15, 1043–1052. [Google Scholar]
  80. Smith, S.E.; Manjarrez, M.; Stonor, R.; McNeill, A.; Smith, F.A. Indigenous arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungi contribute to wheat phosphate uptake in a semi-arid field environment, shown by tracking with radioactive phosphorus. Appl. Soil Ecol. 2015, 96, 68–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Ma, X.; Luo, W.; Li, J.; Wu, F. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi increase both concentrations and bioavilability of Zn in wheat (Triticum aestivum L) grain on Zn-spiked soils. Appl. Soil Ecol. 2019, 135, 91–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Watts-Williams, S.J.; Tyerman, S.D.; Cavagnaro, T.R. The dual benefit of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi under soil zinc deficiency and toxicity: Linking plant physiology and gene expression. Plant Soil 2017, 420, 375–388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Solaiman, M.Z.; Hirata, H. Responses of directly seeded wetland rice to arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi inoculation. J. Plant Nut. 1997, 20, 1479–1487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Chan, W.F.; Li, H.; Wu, F.Y.; Wu, S.C.; Wong, M.H. Arsenic uptake in upland rice inoculated with a combination or single arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. J. Hazard. Mater. 2013, 262, 1116–1122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Garg, N.; Kaur, H. Impact of cadmium-zinc interactions on metal uptake, translocation and yield in pigeonpea genotypes colonized by arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. J. Plant Nutr. 2013, 36, 67–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Bhantana, P.; Malla, R.; Vista, S.P.; Rana, M.S.; Mohamed, G.; Joshi, B.D.; Hu, C.X. Use of Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi (AMF) and Zinc Fertilizers in An Adaptation of Plant from Drought and Heat Stress. Biomed. J. Sci. Tech. Res. 2021, 38, 30357–30373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Nakmee, P.S.; Techapinyawat, S.; Ngamprasit, S. Comparative potentials of native arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi to improve nutrient uptake and biomass of Sorghum bicolor Linn. Agric. Nat. Resour. 2016, 50, 173–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Aliasgharzad, N.; Shirmohamadi, E.; Oustan, S. Siderophore production by mycorrhizal sorghum roots under micronutrient deficient condition. Soil Environ. 2009, 28, 119–123. [Google Scholar]
  89. Zhang, S.; Lehmann, A.; Zheng, W.; You, Z.; Rillig, M.C. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi increase grain yields: A meta-analysis. New Phytol. 2019, 222, 543–555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  90. Abdullahi, R.; Sheriff, H.H.; Buba, A. Effect of biofertilizer and organic manure on growth and nutrients content of pearl millet. ARPN J. Agric. Biol. Sci. 2014, 9, 351–355. [Google Scholar]
  91. Peterson, R.L.; Massicotte, H.B.; Melville, L.H. Mycorrhizas: Anatomy and cell biology. Mycologist 2004, 19, 133. [Google Scholar]
  92. Xu, H.; Lu, Y.; Tong, S. Effects of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi on photosynthesis and chlorophyll fluorescence of maize seedlings under salt stress. Emir. J. Food Agric. 2018, 30, 199–204. [Google Scholar]
  93. De-Andrade, S.A.L.; Domingues, A.P.; Mazzafera, P. Photosynthesis is induced in rice plants that associate with arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and are grown under arsenate and arsenite stress. Chemosphere 2015, 134, 141–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Gernns, H.; Alten, H.; Poehling, H.M. Arbuscular mycorrhiza increased the activity of a biotrophic leaf pathogen–is a compensation possible? Mycorrhiza 2001, 11, 237–243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Achatz, B.; von Rüden, S.; Andrade, D.; Neumann, E.; Pons-Kühnemann, J.; Kogel, K.H.; Waller, F. Root colonization by Piriformospora indica enhances grain yield in barley under diverse nutrient regimes by accelerating plant development. Plant Soil 2010, 333, 59–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Shamshiri, M.H.; Fattahi, M. Effects of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi on photosystem II activity of three pistachio rootstocks under salt stress as probed by the OJIP-test. Russ. J. Plant Physiol. 2016, 63, 101–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Meddich, A.; Ouhaddou, R.; Anli, M.; Boutasknit, A. Role of Phosphorus and Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi in the Growth Performances and Tolerance of Barley to Water Stress. Plant Cell Biotechnol. Mol. Biol. 2021, 22, 45–67. [Google Scholar]
  98. Ruiz-Lozano, J.M.; Aroca, R. Host response to osmotic stresses: Stomatal behaviour and water use efficiency of arbuscular mycorrhizal plants. In Arbuscular mycorrhizas: Physiology and Function; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2010; pp. 239–256. [Google Scholar]
  99. Kamali, S.; Mehraban, A. Effects of Nitroxin and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi on the agro-physiological traits and grain yield of sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L.) under drought stress conditions. PLoS ONE 2020, 15, e0243824. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. García-Parra, M.Á.; Plazas-Leguizamón, N.Z. Análisis del ciclo de vida de las publicaciones sobre la producción de quinua (Chenopodium quinoa Willd), a través de curvas en S. Rev. Investig. Desarro. Innovación 2019, 9, 379–391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Borde, M.; Dudhane, M.; Jite, P. Growth photosynthetic activity and antioxidant responses of mycorrhizal and non-mycorrhizal bajra (Pennisetum glaucum) crop under salinity stress condition. Crop Prot. 2011, 30, 265–271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Bowles, T.M.; Barrios-Masias, F.H.; Carlisle, E.A.; Cavagnaro, T.R.; Jackson, L.E. Efects of arbuscular mycorrhizae on tomato yield, nutrient uptake, water relations, and soil carbon dynamics under defcit irrigation in feld conditions. Sci. Total Environ. 2016, 12, 566–567. [Google Scholar]
  103. Talaat, N.B.; Shawky, B.T. Protective effects of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi on wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) plants exposed to salinity. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2014, 98, 20–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Li, T.; Hu, J.L.; Hao, Z.P.; Li, H.; Wang, Y.S.; Chen, B.D. First cloning and characterization of two functional aquaporin genes from an arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus Glomus intraradices. New Phytol. 2013, 197, 617–630. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Rabie, G.H. Contribution of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus to red kidney and wheat plants tolerance grown in heavy in metal polluted soil. Afr. J. Biotechnol. 2005, 4, 332–345. [Google Scholar]
  106. Shahabivand, S.; Maivan, H.Z.; Goltapeh, E.M.; Sharifi, M.; Aliloo, A.A. The effects of root endophyte and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi on growth and cadmium accumulation in wheat under cadmium toxicity. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2012, 60, 53–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  107. Hajiboland, R.; Joudmand, A.; Aliasgharzad, N.; Tolrá, R.; Poschenrieder, C. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi alleviate low-temperature stress and increase freezing resistance as a substitute for acclimation treatment in barley. Crop Past. Sci. 2019, 70, 218–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Baum, C.; El-Tohamy, W.; Gruda, N. Increasing the productivity and product quality of vegetable crops using arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi: A review. Sci. Hortic. 2015, 187, 131–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Huang, L.L.; Yang, C.; Zhao, Y.; Xu, X.; Xu, Q.; Li, G.Z.; Hao, L. Antioxidant defenses of mycorrhizal fungus infection against SO2-induced oxidative stress in Avena nuda seedlings. Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 2008, 81, 440–444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Evelin, H.; Kapoor, R.; Giri, B. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in alleviation of salt stress: A review. Ann. Bot. 2009, 104, 1263–1280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Alarcon, A.; Davies, F.T.; Autenrieth, R.L.; Zuberer, D.A. Arbuscular mycorrhiza and petroleum-degrading microorganisms enhance phytoremediation of petroleum-contaminated soil. Int. J. Phytoremediation 2008, 10, 251–263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Xun, F.; Xie, B.; Liu, S.; Guo, C. Effect of plant growth-promoting bacteria (PGPR) and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) inoculation on oats in saline-alkali soil contaminated by petroleum to enhance phytoremediation. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2015, 22, 598–608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Kumar, P. Soil applied glycine betaine with Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi reduces chromium uptake and ameliorates chromium toxicity by suppressing the oxidative stress in three genetically different Sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L.) cultivars. BMC Plant Biol. 2021, 21, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  114. Evelin, H.; Giri, B.; Kapoor, R. Ultrastructural evidence for AMF mediated salt stress mitigation in Trigonella foenum-graecum. Mycorrhiza 2013, 23, 71–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Sarwat, M.; Hashem, A.; Ahanger, M.A.; Abd-Allah, E.F.; Alqarawi, A.A.; Alyemeni, M.N.; Gucel, S. Mitigation of NaCl stress by arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi through the modulation of osmolytes, antioxidants and secondary metabolites in mustard (Brassica juncea L.) plants. Front. Plant Sci. 2016, 7, 869. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Prity, S.A.; Sajib, S.A.; Das, U.; Rahman, M.M.; Haider, S.A.; Kabir, A.H. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi mitigate Fe deficiency symptoms in sorghum through phytosiderophore-mediated Fe mobilization and restoration of redox status. Protoplasma 2020, 257, 1373–1385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Vestberg, M.; Palojärvi, A.; Pitkänen, T.; Kaipainen, S.; Puolakka, E.; Keskitalo, M. Neutral lipid fatty acid analysis is a sensitive marker for quantitative estimation of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in agricultural soil with crops of different mycotrophy. Agric. Food Sci. 2012, 21, 12–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Tyagi, J.; Varma, A.; Pudake, R.N. Evaluation of comparative effects of arbuscular mycorrhiza (Rhizophagus intraradices) and endophyte (Piriformospora indica) association with finger millet (Eleusine coracana) under drought stress. Eur. J. Soil Biol. 2017, 81, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Mythili, M.; Ramalakshmi, A. Unraveling the distribution of AMF communities and their metabolites associated with soils of minor millets. Rhizosphere 2022, 21, 100473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Bernardo, L.; Carletti, P.; Badeck, F.W.; Rizza, F.; Morcia, C.; Ghizzoni, R.; Rouphael, Y.; Colla, G.; Terzi, V.; Lucini, L. Metabolomic responses triggered by arbuscular mycorrhiza enhance tolerance to water stress in wheat cultivars. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2019, 137, 203–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Tereucán, G.; Ruiz, A.; Nahuelcura, J.; Oyarzún, P.; Santander, C.; Winterhalter, P.; Cornejo, P. Shifts in biochemical and physiological responses by the inoculation of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in Triticum aestivum growing under drought conditions. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2022, 102, 1927–1938. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Mathur, S.; Sharma, M.P.; Jajoo, A. Improved photosynthetic efficacy of maize (Zea mays) plants with arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) under high temperature stress. J. Photochem. Photobiol. B Biol. 2018, 180, 149–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  123. Silva, F.A.; Maia, L.C.; Silva, F.S. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi as biotechnology alternative to increase concentrate of secondary metabolites in Zea mays L. Braz. J. Bot. 2019, 42, 189–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Bona, E.; Scarafoni, A.; Marsano, F.; Boatti, L.; Copetta, A.; Massa, N.; Berta, G. Arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis affects the grain proteome of Zea mays: A field study. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  125. Tisarum, R.; Theerawitaya, C.; Samphumphuang, T.; Polispitak, K.; Thongpoem, P.; Singh, H.P.; Cha-Um, S. Alleviation of salt stress in upland rice (Oryza sativa L. ssp. indica cv. Leum Pua) using arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi inoculation. Front. Plant Sci. 2020, 11, 348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Vilela, L.A.F.; Barbosa, M.V. Contribution of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in promoting cadmium tolerance in plants. In Cadmium Tolerance Plants; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2019; pp. 553–586. [Google Scholar]
  127. Maier, W.; Schneider, B.; Strack, D. Biosynthesis of sesquiterpenoid cyclohexenone derivatives in mycorrhizal barley roots proceeds via the glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate/pyruvate pathway. Tetrahedron Lett. 1998, 39, 521–524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Vierheilig, H.; Gagnon, H.; Strack, D.; Maier, W. Accumulation of cyclohexenone derivatives in barley, wheat and maize roots in response to inoculation with different arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. Mycorrhiza 2000, 9, 291–293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Peipp, H.; Maier, W.; Schmidt, J.; Wray, V.; Strack, D. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus-induced changes in the accumulation of secondary compounds in barley roots. Phytochem. 1997, 44, 581–587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Sun, X.G.; Tang, M. Effect of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi inoculation on root traits and root volatile organic compound emissions of Sorghum bicolor. S. Afr. J. Bot. 2013, 88, 373–379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Zhang, Q.; Gong, M.; Yuan, J.; Hou, Y.; Zhang, H.; Wang, Y.; Hou, X. Dark septate endophyte improves drought tolerance in Sorghum. Int. J. Agric. Biol. 2017, 19, 53–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Dhawi, F.; Datta, R.; Ramakrishna, W. Mycorrhiza and heavy metal resistant bacteria enhance growth, nutrient uptake and alter metabolic profile of sorghum grown in marginal soil. Chemosphere 2016, 157, 33–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  133. Maier, W.; Peipp, H.; Schmidt, J.; Wray, V.; Strack, D. Levels of a terpenoid glycoside (blumenin) and cell wall-bound phenolics in some cereal mycorrhizas. Plant Physiol. 1995, 109, 465–470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. Maier, W.; Hammer, K.; Dammann, U.; Schulz, B.; Strack, D. Accumulation of sesquiterpenoid cyclohexenone derivatives induced by an arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus in members of the Poaceae. Planta 1997, 202, 36–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  135. Govindarajulu, M.; Pfeffer, P.E.; Jin, H.; Abubaker, J.; Douds, D.D.; Allen, J.W.; Shachar-Hill, Y. Nitrogen transfer in the arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis. Nature 2005, 435, 819–823. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  136. Regvar, M.; Bukovnik, U.; Likar, M.; Kreft, I. UV-B radiation affects flavonoids and fungal colonisation in Fagopyrum esculentum and F. tataricum. Open Life Sci. 2012, 7, 275–283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Karimi, G.; Pourakbar, L.; Moghaddam, S.S.; Popović-Djordjević, J. Integrated effects of bacteria and fungi biofertilizers on morphological traits, antioxidants indices, and polyphenol compounds of quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) under salinity condition. Res. Sq. 2020; preprint. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  138. Colla, G.; Rouphael, Y.; Bonini, P.; Cardarelli, M. Coating seeds with endophytic fungi enhances growth, nutrient uptake, yield and grain quality of winter wheat. Int. J. Plant Prod. 2015, 9, 171–190. [Google Scholar]
  139. Sukumaran, S.; Li, X.; Li, X.; Zhu, C.; Bai, G.; Perumal, R.; Tuinstra, M.R.; Vara Prasad, P.V.; Mitchell, S.E.; Tesso, T.T.; et al. QTL mapping for grain yield, flowering time, and stay-green traits in sorghum with genotyping-by-sequencing markers. Crop Sci. 2006, 56, 1429–1442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Li, H.Y.; Zhu, Y.G.; Marschner, P.; Smith, F.A.; Smith, S.E. Wheat responses to arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in a highly calcareous soil differ from those of clover, and change with plant development and P supply. Plant Soil 2005, 277, 221–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Celebi, S.Z.; Demir, S.; Celebi, R.; Durak, E.D.; Yilmaz, I.H. The effect of Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi (AMF) applications on the silage maize (Zea mays L.) yield in different irrigation regimes. Eur. J. Soil Biol. 2010, 46, 302–305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  142. Gao, C.; El-Sawah, A.M.; Ali, D.F.I.; Alhaj Hamoud, Y.; Shaghaleh, H.; Sheteiwy, M.S. The integration of bio and organic fertilizers improve plant growth, grain yield, quality and metabolism of hybrid maize (Zea mays L.). Agronomy 2020, 10, 319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  143. Parvin, S.; Van Geel, M.; Yeasmin, T.; Verbruggen, E.; Honnay, O. Effects of single and multiple species inocula of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi on the salinity tolerance of a Bangladeshi rice (Oryza sativa L.) cultivar. Mycorrhiza 2020, 30, 431–444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  144. Jerbi, M.; Labidi, S.; Laruelle, F.; Tisserant, B.; Jeddi, F.B.; Sahraoui, A.L.H. Mycorrhizal biofertilization improves grain yield and quality of hulless Barley (Hordeum vulgare ssp. nudum L.) under water stress conditions. J. Cereal Sci. 2022, 104, 103436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  145. Cobb, A.B.; Wilson, G.W.; Goad, C.L.; Bean, S.R.; Kaufman, R.C.; Herald, T.J.; Wilson, J.D. The role of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in grain production and nutrition of sorghum genotypes: Enhancing sustainability through plant-microbial partnership. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2016, 233, 432–440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  146. Kahiluoto, H.; Ketoja, E.; Vestberg, M. Contribution of arbuscular mycorrhiza to soil quality in contrasting cropping systems. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2009, 134, 36–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  147. Castillo, C.G.; Puccio, F.; Morales, D.; Borie, F.; Sieverding, E. Early arbuscular mycorrhiza colonization of wheat, barley and oats in Andosols of southern Chile. J. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr. 2012, 12, 511–524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  148. Toubali, S.; Ait-El-Mokhtar, M.; Boutasknit, A.; Anli, M.; Ait-Rahou, Y.; Benaffari, W.; Meddich, A. Root Reinforcement Improved Performance, Productivity, and Grain Bioactive Quality of Field-Droughted Quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa). Front. Plant Sci. 2022, 13, 860484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  149. Mathimaran, N.; Jegan, S.; Thimmegowda, M.N.; Prabavathy, V.R.; Yuvaraj, P.; Kathiravan, R.; Mäder, P. Intercropping transplanted pigeon pea with finger millet: Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and plant growth promoting rhizobacteria boost yield while reducing fertilizer input. Front. Sustain. Food Syst. 2020, 4, 88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  150. Shen, W.; Feng, Z.; Song, H.; Jin, D.; Fu, Y.; Cheng, F. Effects of solid waste-based soil conditioner and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi on crop productivity and heavy metal distribution in foxtail millet (Setaria italica). J. Environ. Manag. 2022, 313, 114974. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  151. Schütz, L.; Saharan, K.; Mäder, P.; Boller, T.; Mathimaran, N. Rate of hyphal spread of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi from pigeon pea to finger millet and their contribution to plant growth and nutrient uptake in experimental microcosms. Appl. Soil Ecol. 2022, 169, 104156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. The interaction between AM fungal spores and colonization with the sharing and availability of nutrients in the plant’s root. The mycorrhizal uptake pathway is an easy and accessible way for the plants to absorb more P, N, C, K, and Zn from the soil through AM colonization. The figure shows that AM fungi provide nutrients to the host plants and also increase the activities of other microorganisms such as bacteria in the rhizosphere soil, resulting in higher nutrient availability and uptake by plants.
Figure 1. The interaction between AM fungal spores and colonization with the sharing and availability of nutrients in the plant’s root. The mycorrhizal uptake pathway is an easy and accessible way for the plants to absorb more P, N, C, K, and Zn from the soil through AM colonization. The figure shows that AM fungi provide nutrients to the host plants and also increase the activities of other microorganisms such as bacteria in the rhizosphere soil, resulting in higher nutrient availability and uptake by plants.
Agronomy 12 02191 g001
Figure 2. The effect of AM colonization on the photosynthesis and plant growth of cereal plants. The figure shows that higher AM colonization increases the leaf area and photosynthetic rate by improving nutrient uptake. AM colonization stimulates plant hormones such as GA and ABA and facilitates anti-oxidant activities, resulting in higher plant growth and improved plant tolerance against biotic and abiotic stresses. Further, the figure shows that AM fungi reduce water loss, enhance root surface area, improve osmoregulation, and regulate stomata directly and indirectly under harsh conditions.
Figure 2. The effect of AM colonization on the photosynthesis and plant growth of cereal plants. The figure shows that higher AM colonization increases the leaf area and photosynthetic rate by improving nutrient uptake. AM colonization stimulates plant hormones such as GA and ABA and facilitates anti-oxidant activities, resulting in higher plant growth and improved plant tolerance against biotic and abiotic stresses. Further, the figure shows that AM fungi reduce water loss, enhance root surface area, improve osmoregulation, and regulate stomata directly and indirectly under harsh conditions.
Agronomy 12 02191 g002
Figure 3. The effect of AM fungi on the primary and secondary metabolites of cereal plants. AM fungi influence the primary and secondary metabolites directly or indirectly and change various physiological processes by improving plant nutrient uptake and by mediating various pathways, which leads to higher synthesis of the primary and secondary metabolites in the plants. The figure shows that the primary and secondary metabolites are largely associated with plant growth and development, plant defense, and tolerance against various biotic and abiotic stressors. SOD: Superoxide dismutase; POD: peroxidase; CAT: catalase.
Figure 3. The effect of AM fungi on the primary and secondary metabolites of cereal plants. AM fungi influence the primary and secondary metabolites directly or indirectly and change various physiological processes by improving plant nutrient uptake and by mediating various pathways, which leads to higher synthesis of the primary and secondary metabolites in the plants. The figure shows that the primary and secondary metabolites are largely associated with plant growth and development, plant defense, and tolerance against various biotic and abiotic stressors. SOD: Superoxide dismutase; POD: peroxidase; CAT: catalase.
Agronomy 12 02191 g003
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Khan, Y.; Shah, S.; Hui, T. The Roles of Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi in Influencing Plant Nutrients, Photosynthesis, and Metabolites of Cereal Crops—A Review. Agronomy 2022, 12, 2191. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy12092191

AMA Style

Khan Y, Shah S, Hui T. The Roles of Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi in Influencing Plant Nutrients, Photosynthesis, and Metabolites of Cereal Crops—A Review. Agronomy. 2022; 12(9):2191. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy12092191

Chicago/Turabian Style

Khan, Yaseen, Sulaiman Shah, and Tian Hui. 2022. "The Roles of Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi in Influencing Plant Nutrients, Photosynthesis, and Metabolites of Cereal Crops—A Review" Agronomy 12, no. 9: 2191. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy12092191

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop