Next Article in Journal
Influence of Kosakonia sp. on the Growth of Arachis hypogaea L. on Arid Soil
Next Article in Special Issue
Genetic Diversity and Population Differentiation of Dongxiang Wild Rice (Oryza rufipogon Griff.) Based on SNP Markers
Previous Article in Journal
Diversity among Traditional Minority Red Grape Varieties According to Their Aromatic Profile
Previous Article in Special Issue
Genome-Wide Association Study of Sheath Blight Resistance within a Core Collection of Rice (Oryza sativa L.)
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Communication

QTL Mapping of Mesocotyl Elongation and Confirmation of a QTL in Dongxiang Common Wild Rice in China

1
Chongqing Engineering Research Center of Specialty Crop Resource, Chongqing Normal University, Chongqing 401331, China
2
Institute of Crop Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081, China
3
College of Agriculture, Yangtze University, Jingzhou 434023, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Agronomy 2022, 12(8), 1800; https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy12081800
Submission received: 16 June 2022 / Revised: 25 July 2022 / Accepted: 26 July 2022 / Published: 29 July 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Discovery and Utilization of Germplasm Resources in Rice)

Abstract

:
Direct-seeded rice (DSR) cultivation is an effective and important way to resolve agricultural labor scarcity, water scarcity and high production cost issues. Mesocotyl elongation (ME) is the main driver of the rapid emergence of rice seedlings from the soil and is an important indicator of the suitability of rice varieties for direct seeding. Hence, discovering ME-related genes is particularly important for breeding rice varieties suitable for direct seeding. In this study, a chromosome segment substitution line (CSSL) population generated from a cross between Dongxiang common wild rice and Nipponbare (Nip) was used to map quantitative trait loci (QTLs) for ME. Two QTLs for mesocotyl length were identified on chromosomes 3 and 6 with logarithm of odds (LOD) scores ranging from 5.47 to 6.04 and explaining 15.95–16.79% of the phenotypic variance. Among these QTLs, qML6 accounted for the highest phenotypic variance (16.79%). Then, to confirm the strongest QTL, we generated an F2 segregating population via the CSL127 line harboring the qML6 locus and the recurrent parent Nip. The QTL qML6-1 associated with ME was mapped to a location between markers DX-C6-2 and DX-C6-4, which is consistent with the location of the previously mapped QTL qML6. qML6-1 had an LOD score of 8.45 and explained 30.56% of the phenotypic variance. The QTLs detected in this study provide promising targets for further genetic characterization and for use in marker-assisted selection to develop varieties with improved ME for the cultivation of DSR.

1. Introduction

Direct-seeded rice (DSR) refers to rice seeds simply sown directly in the field, circumventing the steps of germination and transplanting. Compared with the traditional transplanting system, the DSR system has received increasing attention in rice growing regions around the world, as the DSR system is time saving, labor saving, and efficient [1,2,3,4]. According to the water conditions in the field at the time of sowing, DSR methods can be divided into dry direct seeding (sowing dry seeds onto dry soil), wet direct seeding (sowing pregerminated seeds onto wet, puddled soils), and waterlogged direct seeding (sowing seeds into standing water) [5]. The production of DSR generally faces three major problems, namely, difficulties involving seedling emergence, problems associated with severe grass damage and problems due to plant lodging. Difficulties associated with seedling emergence are the primary problems restricting the yield of DSR, which hinders the promotion of DSR on a large scale [6]. In the process of DSR cultivation, the elongation of the mesocotyl (the tissue between the insertion point of the radicle and the coleoptile node) is an important characteristic affecting the emergence of seedlings [7,8,9]. The elongation of the mesocotyl moves the germ and coleoptile close to the soil surface, allowing seedlings to grow in flooded and dark soil layers, thus ensuring high seedling survival and overall emergence [10,11]. Germplasms with a short mesocotyl have insufficient soil-breaking ability, exhibit slow emergence, and have a low survival rate, while germplasms with a long mesocotyl have a fast emergence rate, a high survival rate, and uniform emergence [12]. However, due to the long-term use of transplanting during cultivation, the number of rice varieties with mesocotyl elongation (ME) used in current production is low. Discovering the genes controlling ME and revealing the mechanisms controlling ME are essential for improving ME characteristics and for breeding new rice varieties suitable for direct seeding.
Rice has a long history of domestication, and there is an extremely rich abundance of germplasm resources. The heritability of mesocotyl length is high, and the differences in ME characteristics among different rice germplasm resources are obvious. It has been reported that, in general, the mesocotyl of indica rice is longer than that of japonica rice, and that of weedy rice is longer than that of cultivated rice [13,14,15,16]. Due to the differences in ME characteristics among resources, combined with the use of molecular markers, quantitative trait locus (QTL) mapping for ME in rice has been carried out by several research groups. Using an F2 population constructed with japonica Labelle and indica BlackGora, Redoña et al. [17] detected five QTLs affecting ME on chromosomes 1, 3, 5, and 7. Three QTLs controlling mesocotyl length were identified by the use of an F2:3 population resulting from a cross between the Indian cultivar Surjamkhi and the Chinese cultivar Dao Ren Qiao [18]. Using a doubled haploid population from a cross between indica and japonica cultivars, Cao et al. [19] detected eight QTLs and found that ME is mainly affected by epistasis and additive effects. Ou-yang et al. [20] used a recombinant inbred line (RIL) population to map 27 QTLs for ME. Lee et al. [21,22] generated a backcross inbred line (BIL) population using Kasalath and Nipponbare (Nip) and conducted QTL mapping for ME in 2012 and 2017 via dark box and deep-seeding conditions, and five and three QTLs were identified, respectively. Huang et al. [10] and Niu et al. [23] used an RIL population to map five and three QTLs for ME, respectively. In addition to using linkage analysis to locate ME-related QTLs, several researchers have identified ME loci via genome-wide association analysis of natural populations. Wu et al. [24] detected nine ME loci in 170 core germplasms and 100 drought-tolerant materials; Lu et al. [25] detected 17 ME loci within 469 indica rice materials; and Liu et al. [26] detected a total of 16 ME loci in 208 rice materials under sand, soil, and hydroponic conditions. Jang et al. [27] used a core collection of 137 rice accessions and identified 11 QTLs for ME. As mentioned above, more than 100 QTLs for ME have been reported, and four QTLs, qML1/qML1-1, qML3/qMel-3, qML6/qMel-6 and qML7/qML7-1, on chromosomes 1, 3, 6 and 7 have been identified several times. However, the vast majority of ME QTLs were detected in cultivars and landraces using temporary genetic populations, and there are few reports on QTL analysis involving wild rice resources. A chromosome segment substitution line (CSSL) population is generally developed through crossing, advanced backcrossing with marker-assisted selection and self-crossing. Each final CSSL carries a single or several chromosomal segments from the donor parent in the background of the recurrent parent and can thus be regarded as a near-isogenic line of the recurrent parent. The CSSL strategy is particularly suitable for the construction of a genetic population with wild rice as the donor parent. In addition, CSSLs can also minimize linkage drag, and facilitate the map-based cloning of QTLs [28]. Hence, genetic studies involving additional sources, such as wild rice, in genetic populations with high QTL detection efficiency and stability, are needed to discover novel QTLs.
In this study, to discover new QTLs or major QTLs for ME in wild rice, we used a set of CSSLs derived from Dongxiang common wild rice and Nip as materials to analyze QTLs. Our results will provide important information for further functional analysis of ME-related genes and the discovery of excellent alleles for DSR variety improvement.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Plant Materials

Previously, our laboratory used Dongxiang common wild rice as the donor parent and Nip as the recurrent parent to develop a set of 104 CSSLs through crossing and backcrossing with marker-assisted selection based on 203 polymorphic molecular markers. The 104 CSSLs covered 87.94% of the genome of Dongxiang common wild rice, and each CSSL contained an average of four introgressed segments [28]. In this study, we used this set of CSSLs as plant materials. All of the materials, including the CSSLs and the recurrent parent Nip, were planted in the field at the Institute of Crop Sciences of the Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences (CAAS), and the plants were managed in accordance with standard practices.
To confirm the largest QTL, qML6, we selected the line CSL127, which contains Dongxiang common wild rice chromosome segment harboring qML6 locus, to cross with the recurrent parent Nip and generated an F2 segregating population. CSL127 has exceeded the BC5F8 generations and is a stable pure line. For the convenience of description, we subsequently express this segregating population as F2. A total of 119 F2 individuals were used to develop F2:3 families for collecting phenotypic data.

2.2. Evaluation of ME

The seeds were placed in an oven at 45 °C for 1 week to break dormancy. Fifty full and uniform seeds were selected, placed in 50 mL centrifuge tubes, and sterilized with 10% sodium hypochlorite. The seeds were then placed in an oven at 35 °C for 2 days for germination. Afterward, 30 seeds displaying relatively uniform radicle lengths were placed in 96-well germination plates in plastic pots (55 cm long, 40 cm wide and 10 cm high) with 2 L of pure water and then incubated at 28 °C for 7 days in the dark. ME length, which was measured as the distance from the root base to the coleoptile node, was measured for each seedling using a ruler. Seedlings with poor growth were removed.

2.3. Genotypic Data of the F2 Segregating Population and QTL Analyses

The QTLs controlling ME in the CSSLs were mapped by using previously reported genotypic data from our laboratory [28,29]. The CSL (QTL mapping in CSS lines) functionality was used to identify QTLs by the likelihood ratio test based on the stepwise regression for additive QTL (RSTEP-LRT-ADD) mapping method, which was developed for QTL mapping in nonideal or ideal CSSL populations [30]. The largest p-value for entering variables in the stepwise regression of residual phenotype on marker variables (PIN) was set to 0.001, and the largest p-value for removing variables (Pout) was set to 0.002. Permutations of 1000 times tests were used to determine LOD thresholds to declare significant QTL (p < 0.05) and to calculate the genome-wide type I error for each QTL [31]. QTL detection by RSTEP-LRT, the calculation of phenotypic variation explained (PVE) by each QTL, and the estimation of QTL additive effects, were implemented by QTL IciMapping software [32].
To obtain genotypic data for the F2 segregating population, young leaves from each plant were harvested, and genomic DNA was extracted using the conventional cetyltrimethylammonium bromide method [33]. Genotyping was performed using polymorphic InDel markers (Supplementary Table S1). Each PCR amplification was performed in a 10 μL mixture, which consisted of 50 ng of genomic DNA, 0.5 μL of each forward and reverse primer (10 μmol·L−1), 5 µL of 2 × Taq PCR Mix for polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (PAGE) (Genesand Biotech, Beijing, China), and enough ddH2O to reach the total reaction volume. The PCR conditions were as follows: 94 °C for 5 min; 35 cycles of 94 °C for 30 s, 59 °C for 30 s, and 72 °C for 30 s, with a final extension at 72 °C for 5 min; and then holding at 16 °C. The PCR products were separated via electrophoresis on 8% polyacrylamide gels, and the results were observed and recorded using a gel imaging system. The linkage map was constructed using QTL IciMapping software with the Kosambi mapping function [32]. The anchor only was used in grouping, the ordering algorithm was anchor order, and the criterion used in rippling was the sum of adjacent recombination fractions (SARF) [32]. In the F2 segregating population, QTL analysis was conducted by the inclusive composite interval mapping for additive QTL (ICIM-ADD) mapping method [34]. The determination of the LOD threshold, QTL detection, PVE calculation, and additive effect estimation were performed with the same method as for the CSSL population described above.

3. Results

3.1. Phenotypic Variation

The phenotypic distribution of ME in Nip and the CSSLs is shown in Figure 1. The mean mesocotyl length for Nip was 3.9 mm. However, the mean mesocotyl length was 4.5 mm for the CSSLs, ranging from 1.7 to 10.9 mm, and the coefficient of variation was 49%. The mesocotyl length of the CSSLs presented a continuous distribution, indicating that it is a quantitative trait controlled by multiple genes in rice.

3.2. QTL Analysis of the ME

At the significant level of p < 0.05, the threshold LOD score of 3.34, was established using 1000 permutations in QTL IciMapping software [32]. Based on the analysis, two QTLs above the permutation threshold were identified in the CSSLs (Figure 2, Table 1), named qML3 and qML6, with LOD scores of 5.47 to 6.04, explaining 15.95–16.79% of the phenotypic variation. qML3 was located near the DX-C3-27 marker on chromosome 3; this QTL had an LOD score of 6.04, an additive effect of 9.5 mm and explained 15.95% of the phenotypic variation. qML6 was located near the DX-C6-4 marker on chromosome 6; this QTL had an LOD score of 5.47, an additive effect of 4.1 mm, and explained 16.79% of the phenotypic variation. Dongxiang common wild rice alleles at all QTLs contributed to an increase in mesocotyl length.

3.3. Confirmation of the Largest QTL, qML6

According to the results of the QTL analysis presented above, the qML6 locus explained the most phenotypic variation. Fortunately, we had a segregating population that could be directly used, and one of its parents was CSL127. CSL127 is an introgression line harboring Dongxiang common wild rice introgression at the qML6 locus. Thus, we used this segregating population to perform a QTL analysis and check whether the locus could be repeatedly mapped.
A significant difference in mesocotyl length was found between the two parents, Nip and CSL127 (Figure 3). The mesocotyl of CSL127 was longer than 27.8 mm, whereas that of Nip was approximately 4.0 mm. The mean mesocotyl length was 11.6 mm among the plants in the F2 segregating population, although the length ranged from 0 to 34.1 mm (Figure 4).
The CSL127 line contains six inserted segments from Dongxiang common wild rice on chromosomes 1, 2, 4, 6, 7 and 12. We genotyped each plant in the F2 population via polymorphic indel markers in the six inserted segments. QTL analysis revealed that the LOD score of only one QTL, qML6-1, surpassed the threshold score of 3.61, which established using 1000 permutations (p < 0.05). No significant QTLs for mesocotyl length were detected, except for on chromosome 6 (data not shown). qML6-1 was located between the markers DX-C6-2 and DX-C6-4 and had an LOD score of 8.45 and explained 30.56% of the phenotypic variation (Figure 5). The qML6-1 and qML6 positions overlapped, indicating that the qML6 QTL is a reliable locus for ME.

4. Discussion

Rice (Oryza sativa. L) is one of the most important cereal crop species, as it provides food for more than half of the global population. However, during planting, germinating rice seeds, collecting the seedlings, and transplanting them necessitate considerable amounts of labor and material resources, and thus, DSR cultivation has gradually received increasing attention. However, due to the low seedling establishment rate and slow emergence of DSR, its application and promotion are limited. Elongation of the mesocotyl is the main driver of rapid seedling emergence in rice, and the vascular system of the seedling mesocotyl transports nutrients and oxygen to the roots during the soil-breaking process to enable elongation under flooded conditions and within dark soil layers, thereby ensuring a higher emergence rate [35,36,37,38]. Therefore, ME is among the important breeding objectives with respect to the breeding of DSR varieties. In this study, we detected two QTLs on chromosomes 3 and 6. qML6 and qML3 were the two major QTLs, which explained 16.79% and 15.95% of the phenotypic variation, respectively.
Comparing the QTLs detected in this study with those previously reported, we found that qML3 and qML6 have been reported multiple times. The chromosomal position of qML3 detected in this study is similar to that of qMel-3, qml3, and qML3 reported by Lee et al. [22], Cao et al. [19], and Huang et al. [10], respectively. Similarly, in these three studies, qMel-6, qml6 and qML6 were found to be located at the same chromosomal position as qML6 in the present study. In addition, Liu et al. [39] combined QTL sequencing (QTL-seq) and linkage analysis to identify the ME QTL qML3 at the same location and speculated on the candidate genes in this region. Liu et al. [26] used genome-wide association analysis and identified a ME QTL within the 7.3–9.7 Mb region of chromosome 6, whose peak marker was rs_6_7313005; this QTL overlaps with the qML6 locus in this study.
qML3 and qML6 were the two major QTLs for ME that we mapped. The next step is to generate near-isogenic lines of these two loci and carry out fine mapping. Although we used CSSLs, several chromosomal segments of Dongxiang wild rice were inserted into the genome of many different lines. For example, the CSL66 line containing the qML3 locus contains seven inserted segments, and the CSL127 line containing the qML6 locus contains six inserted segments (data not shown). Therefore, it is not feasible to directly use the corresponding population of lines for fine mapping. In previous work, we crossed the CSL127 line with Nip and generated an F2 segregating population. In the present study, we used this F2 population to analyze QTLs for ME and verify that qML6 is a positive-effect QTL. In future research, we can use this method to verify whether the mapped QTL has a positive effect to confirm the reliability of the results in advance and to improve the success rate of mapping genes underlying quantitative traits.
Although both ME-associated QTLs detected in this study have been reported previously, the allelic effects of these two loci differed significantly from those previously reported. This was particularly evident for the two main-effect QTLs qML3 and qML6. In this study, qML3 had the largest additive effect (9.5 mm), which is much larger than the 6.41 mm for qMel-3 [22], 2.1 mm for qml3 [19], and 2.9 mm for qML3 [10]. qML6 had a small additive effect of 4.1 mm, but this effect was also significantly greater than the 3.89 mm effect observed for qMel-6 [22] and 1.7 mm observed for qML6 [10]. These discrepant results may be related to the materials used in our study. We used a set of CSSLs, with Dongxiang common wild rice serving as the donor parent and Nip serving as the recurrent parent, to analyze QTLs for ME. Most previous studies have used RILs, BILs or natural populations generated from resources such as breeding varieties and landraces, and only one study used a temporary F2 population derived from a cross of common wild rice W1944 and indica rice Pei-kuh [40]. Differences in the effects of the same QTL may be caused by differences in the study materials. Thus, the selection of appropriate or novel study materials is crucial for the discovery of new or large-effect QTLs. During the breeding process of varieties, many superior alleles in wild rice have been artificially selected. Therefore, research involving the use of wild rice resources can be used to identify alleles that have been lost from cultivated rice, apply these alleles to rice variety improvement, and broaden the genetic base of breeding parents.

5. Conclusions

As the number of farmers has declined, rice cultivation has undergone profound changes. DSR is becoming increasingly popular among farmers. The seedling establishment rate, one of the important factors affecting the yield of DSR, is closely related to ME. In this study, we used CSSLs generated from Dongxiang common wild rice and identified four QTLs for ME, of which qML3 and qML6 were the two main-effect loci. Compared with the already reported ME-related loci, these two loci had larger additive effects. Moreover, using an existing F2 segregating population, we verified that qML6 was a reliable QTL. These QTLs should be subsequently finely mapped and cloned to understand the genetic control of ME to ensure seedling success and provide a useful genetic resource for DSR variety breeding.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/agronomy12081800/s1, Table S1: Sequences of the primers used in this study.

Author Contributions

Q.H., X.M. and L.H. conceived and designed the study. Q.H., C.J., Y.C., D.C. and B.H. performed the experiments. Q.H. and X.M. analyzed all experiments data. Q.H., X.M. and Z.Z. wrote the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by National Key Research and Development Program of China (2021YFD1200501), the Project of Sanya Yazhou Bay Science and Technology City (SKJC-2020-02-001), CAAS Science and Technology Innovation Program, Protective Program of Crop Germplasm of China (19200385-1), The third national survey and collection action on crop germplasm resource (19210859, 19210860), National Crop Germplasm Resources Center (NCGRC-2021-02).

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Peng, S.; Tang, Q.; Zou, Y. Current status and challenges of rice production in China. Plant Prod. Sci. 2009, 12, 3–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Kato, Y.; Katsura, K. Rice adaptation to aerobic soils: Physiological considerations and implications for agronomy. Plant Prod. Sci. 2014, 17, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Kumar, V.; Ladha, J.K. Direct seeding of rice: Recent developments and future research needs. Adv. Agron. 2011, 111, 297–413. [Google Scholar]
  4. Liu, H.; Hussain, S.; Zheng, M.; Peng, S.; Huang, J.; Cui, K.; Nie, L. Dry direct-seeded rice as an alternative to transplanted-flooded rice in central China. Agron. Sustain. Dev. 2015, 35, 285–294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Farooq, M.; Siddique, K.H.M.; Rehman, H.; Aziz, T.; Lee, D.J.; Wahid, A. Rice direct seeding: Experiences, challenges and opportunities. Soil Tillage Res. 2011, 111, 87–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Zhang, X.; Zhu, D. Production Status and Prospects of Direct-seeded Rice in China. China Rice 1996, 2, 1–4, (In Chinese with English Abstract). [Google Scholar]
  7. Feng, F.; Mei, H.; Fan, P.; Li, Y.; Xu, X.; Wei, H.; Ying, M.; Luo, L. Dynamic transcriptome and phytohormone profiling along the time of light exposure in the mesocotyl of rice seedling. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 11961. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Kutschera, U.; Wang, Z. Growth-limiting proteins in maize coleoptiles and the auxin-brassinosteroid hypothesis of mesocotyl elongation. Protoplasma 2016, 253, 3–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Zhang, H.; Ma, P.; Zhao, Z.; Zhao, G.; Tian, B.; Wang, J.; Wang, G. Mapping QTL controlling maize deep-seeding tolerance-related traits and confirmation of a major QTL for mesocotyl length. Theor. Appl. Genet. 2012, 124, 223–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Huang, C.; Jiang, S.; Feng, L.; Xu, Z.; Chen, W. Analysis of QTLs for mesocotyl length in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Acta Agron. Sin. 2010, 36, 1108–1113, (In Chinese with English Abstract). [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Dang, X.; Thi, T.G.T.; Dong, G.; Wang, H.; Edzesi, W.M.; Hong, D. Genetic diversity and association mapping of seed vigor in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Planta 2014, 239, 1309–1319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Zhang, G.; Lin, J.; Wu, M.; Cao, L.; Cheng, S. Analysis on germinating dynamic source of rice. Chin. J. Rice Sci. 2005, 19, 59–62, (In Chinese with English Abstract). [Google Scholar]
  13. Takahashi, N. Adaptive importance of mesocotyl and coleoptile growth in rice under different moisture regimes. Aust. J. Plant Physiol. 1978, 5, 511–517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Wang, Y.; Ma, D.; Chen, W. Preliminary study on mesocotyl elongation characteristics of northern weedy rice. China Rice 2008, 3, 47–49, (In Chinese with English Abstract). [Google Scholar]
  15. Turner, F.T.; Chen, C.; Bollich, C.N. Coleoptile and mesocotyl lengths in semi-dwarf rice seedlings. Crop Sci. 1982, 22, 43–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Wu, M.; Zhang, G.; Lin, J.; Cheng, S. Screening for rice germplasms with specially-elongated mesocotyl. Rice Sci. 2005, 12, 226–228. [Google Scholar]
  17. Redoña, E.D.; Mackill, D.J. Mapping quantitative trait loci for seedling vigor in rice using RFLPs. Theor. Appl. Genet. 1996, 92, 395–402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Katsuta-Seki, M.; Ebana, K.; Okuno, K. QTL analysis for mesocotyl elongation in rice. Rice Genet. Newsl. 1996, 13, 126. [Google Scholar]
  19. Cao, L.; Zhu, J.; Yan, Q.; He, L.; Wei, X.; Cheng, S. Mapping QTLs with epistasis for mesocotyl length in a DH population from indica-japonica cross of rice (Oryza sativa). Chin. J. Rice Sci. 2002, 16, 221–224, (In Chinese with English Abstract). [Google Scholar]
  20. Ou-yang, Y.; Zhang, Q.; Zhang, K.; Yu, S.; Zhuang, J.; Jin, Q.; Cheng, S. QTL mapping and interaction analysis of genotype × environment (Fe2+-concentrations) for mesocotyl length in Rice (Oryza sativa L.). Acta Genet. Sin. 2005, 32, 712–718, (In Chinese with English Abstract). [Google Scholar]
  21. Lee, H.S.; Sasaki, K.; Higashitani, A.; Ahn, S.N.; Sato, T. Mapping and characterization of quantitative trait loci for mesocotyl elongation in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Rice 2012, 5, 13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Lee, H.S.; Sasaki, K.; Kang, J.W.; Sato, T.; Song, W.Y.; Ahn, S.N. Mesocotyl elongation is essential for seedling emergence under deep-seeding condition in rice. Rice 2017, 10, 32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Niu, S.; Lv, Y.; Wu, Y.; Wei, X.; Sheng, Z.; Jiao, G.; Hu, S.; Tang, S. QTLs Mapping for Mesocotyl Length in Rice. China Rice 2019, 25, 55–59, (In Chinese with English Abstract). [Google Scholar]
  24. Wu, J.; Feng, F.; Lian, X.; Teng, X.; Wei, H.; Yu, H.; Xie, W.; Yan, M.; Fan, P.; Li, Y.; et al. Genome-wide Association Study (GWAS) of mesocotyl elongation based on re-sequencing approach in rice. BMC Plant Biol. 2015, 15, 218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Lu, Q.; Zhang, M.; Niu, X.; Wang, C.; Xu, Q.; Feng, Y.; Wang, S.; Yuan, X.; Yu, H.; Wang, Y.; et al. Uncovering novel loci for mesocotyl elongation and shoot length in indica rice through genome-wide association mapping. Planta 2016, 243, 645–657. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Liu, H.; Zhan, J.; Li, J.; Lu, X.; Liu, J.; Wang, Y.; Zhao, Q.; Ye, G. Genome-wide Association Study (GWAS) for Mesocotyl Elongation in Rice (Oryza sativa L.) under Multiple Culture Conditions. Genes 2019, 11, 49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Jang, S.-G.; Park, S.-Y.; Lar, S.M.; Zhang, H.; Lee, A.-R.; Cao, F.-Y.; Seo, J.; Ham, T.-H.; Lee, J.; Kwon, S.-W. Genome-Wide Association Study (GWAS) of Mesocotyl Length for Direct Seeding in Rice. Agronomy 2021, 11, 2527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Ma, X.; Han, B.; Tang, J.; Zhang, J.; Cui, D.; Geng, L.; Zhou, H.; Li, M.; Han, L. Construction of chromosome segment substitution lines of Dongxiang common wild rice (Oryza rufifipogon Griff.) in the background of the japonica rice cultivar Nipponbare (Oryza sativa L.). Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2019, 144, 274–282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Ma, X.; Tang, J.; Zhang, J.; Cui, D.; Li, H.; Li, M.; Han, L. Development of molecular markers polymorphic between Dongxiang wild rice and Geng rice cultivar ‘Nipponbare’. Acta Agron. Sin. 2019, 45, 316–321, (In Chinese with English Abstract). [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Wang, J.; Wan, X.; Crossa, J.; Crouch, J.; Weng, J.; Zhai, H.; Wan, J. QTL mapping of grain length in rice (Oryza sativa L.) using chromosome segment substitution lines. Genet. Res. 2006, 88, 93–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Qi, L.; Sun, Y.; Li, J.; Su, L.; Zheng, X.; Wang, X.; Li, K.; Yang, Q.; Qiao, W. Identify QTLs for grain size and weight in common wild rice using chromosome segment substitution lines across six environments. Breed. Sci. 2017, 67, 472–482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Meng, L.; Li, H.; Zhang, L.; Wang, J. QTL IciMapping: Integrated software for genetic linkage map construction and quantitative trait locus mapping in bi-parental populations. Crop J. 2015, 3, 269–283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. McCouch, S.R.; Kochert, G.; Yu, Z.; Wang, Z.; Khush, G.S.; Coffman, W.R.; Tanksley, S.D. Molecular mapping of rice chromosomes. Theor. Appl. Genet. 1988, 76, 148–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Li, H.; Ye, G.; Wang, J. A modified algorithm for the improvement of composite interval mapping. Genetics 2007, 175, 361–374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Alibu, S.; Saito, Y.; Shiwachi, H.; Irie, K. Genotypic variation in coleoptile or mesocotyl lengths of upland rice (Oryza sativa L.) and seedling emergence in deep sowing. Afr. J. Agric. Res. 2012, 7, 6239–6248. [Google Scholar]
  36. Nghi, K.N.; Tondelli, A.; Valè, G.; Tagliani, A.; Marè, C.; Perata, P.; Pucciariello, C. Dissection of coleoptile elongation in japonica rice under submergence through integrated genome-wide association mapping and transcriptional analyses. Plant Cell Environ. 2019, 42, 1832–1846. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Helms, R.S.; Dilday, R.H.; Mgonja, M.A.; Amonsilpa, S. Genetic and plant growth regulator manipulation of rice (Oryza sativa L.) mesocotyl and coleoptile lengths. Proc. Ark. Acad. Sci. 1989, 43, 42–45. [Google Scholar]
  38. Zhan, J.; Lu, X.; Liu, H.; Zhao, Q.; Ye, G. Mesocotyl elongation, an essential trait for dry-seeded rice (Oryza sativa L.): A review of physiological and genetic basis. Planta 2019, 251, 27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Liu, C.; Meng, Y.; Liu, J.; Wang, Y.; Ye, G. Combining QTL-seq and linkage analysis to identify the QTL of mesocotyl elongation in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Acta Agron. Sin. 2021, 47, 2036–2044, (In Chinese with English Abstract). [Google Scholar]
  40. Cai, H.W.; Morishima, H. QTL clusters reflect character associations in wild and cultivated rice. Theor. Appl. Genet. 2002, 104, 1217–1228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Frequency distribution of the mesocotyl length of the CSSLs. The triangle represents the mean mesocotyl length of Nip.
Figure 1. Frequency distribution of the mesocotyl length of the CSSLs. The triangle represents the mean mesocotyl length of Nip.
Agronomy 12 01800 g001
Figure 2. Chromosomal locations of QTLs for mesocotyl length in the CSSLs. The abbreviations for the QTLs are defined in Table 1. The position of each marker is based on the physical distance shown to the left of each chromosome, and the molecular marker is shown on the right. The positions of the two significant QTLs on chromosomes 3 and 6 are illustrated by solid black bars next to the chromosomes.
Figure 2. Chromosomal locations of QTLs for mesocotyl length in the CSSLs. The abbreviations for the QTLs are defined in Table 1. The position of each marker is based on the physical distance shown to the left of each chromosome, and the molecular marker is shown on the right. The positions of the two significant QTLs on chromosomes 3 and 6 are illustrated by solid black bars next to the chromosomes.
Agronomy 12 01800 g002
Figure 3. Comparison of ME between the Nip and CSL127 lines. (a) Seedlings of Nip and CSL127 after growing for 7 days in darkness. The arrows indicate the mesocotyls. Scale bar, 20 mm. (b) Mesocotyl length. The values are the means ± SD of 12 seedlings. The significance of differences between Nip and CSL127 was determined by Student’s t test (*, p < 0.01).
Figure 3. Comparison of ME between the Nip and CSL127 lines. (a) Seedlings of Nip and CSL127 after growing for 7 days in darkness. The arrows indicate the mesocotyls. Scale bar, 20 mm. (b) Mesocotyl length. The values are the means ± SD of 12 seedlings. The significance of differences between Nip and CSL127 was determined by Student’s t test (*, p < 0.01).
Agronomy 12 01800 g003
Figure 4. Frequency distribution of the mesocotyl length of plants within the F2 segregating population. The black and white triangles represent the mean mesocotyl lengths of the Nip and CSL127 lines, respectively.
Figure 4. Frequency distribution of the mesocotyl length of plants within the F2 segregating population. The black and white triangles represent the mean mesocotyl lengths of the Nip and CSL127 lines, respectively.
Agronomy 12 01800 g004
Figure 5. Confirmation of qML6 via an F2 segregating population. The position of the significant QTL, qML6-1, is illustrated by the solid black bar within the chromosome, and the LOD scores are shown on the right. On the left, the black text represents the molecular marker, and the blue text indicates the linkage position of the corresponding molecular marker on chromosome 6. The marker space unit is centimorgan.
Figure 5. Confirmation of qML6 via an F2 segregating population. The position of the significant QTL, qML6-1, is illustrated by the solid black bar within the chromosome, and the LOD scores are shown on the right. On the left, the black text represents the molecular marker, and the blue text indicates the linkage position of the corresponding molecular marker on chromosome 6. The marker space unit is centimorgan.
Agronomy 12 01800 g005
Table 1. QTLs for mesocotyl length detected in the CSSLs.
Table 1. QTLs for mesocotyl length detected in the CSSLs.
LocusChromosomeMarker NamePositionLODPVE (%) aAdditive Effect bPositive Allele c
qML33DX-C3-2728.36 Mb6.0415.959.5DX
qML66DX-C6-48.15 Mb5.4716.794.1DX
a Phenotypic variation explained by individual QTLs. b Estimated effect of replacing Nip alleles with Dongxiang common wild rice. c DX represents the positive effects of QTLs contributed by Dongxiang common wild rice alleles.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Huang, Q.; Ju, C.; Cheng, Y.; Cui, D.; Han, B.; Zhao, Z.; Ma, X.; Han, L. QTL Mapping of Mesocotyl Elongation and Confirmation of a QTL in Dongxiang Common Wild Rice in China. Agronomy 2022, 12, 1800. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy12081800

AMA Style

Huang Q, Ju C, Cheng Y, Cui D, Han B, Zhao Z, Ma X, Han L. QTL Mapping of Mesocotyl Elongation and Confirmation of a QTL in Dongxiang Common Wild Rice in China. Agronomy. 2022; 12(8):1800. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy12081800

Chicago/Turabian Style

Huang, Qian, Chunyan Ju, Yibing Cheng, Di Cui, Bing Han, Zhengwu Zhao, Xiaoding Ma, and Longzhi Han. 2022. "QTL Mapping of Mesocotyl Elongation and Confirmation of a QTL in Dongxiang Common Wild Rice in China" Agronomy 12, no. 8: 1800. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy12081800

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop