Next Article in Journal
Investigation of the Effects of Probiotics on Sub-Chronic Neonicotinoid Toxicity in Rats
Previous Article in Journal
Antioxidant Activity, Polyphenolic Profiles and Antibacterial Properties of Leaf Extract of Various Paulownia spp. Clones
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Agronomy
Volume 11
Issue 10
10.3390/agronomy11102002
agronomy-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Effects of Insect Growth Regulators on Mortality, Survival, and Feeding of Euprosterna elaeasa (Lepidoptera: Limacodidae) Larvae

by
Luis Carlos Martínez
1,*,
Angelica Plata-Rueda
2 and
José Eduardo Serrão
1
1
Department of General Biology, Federal University of Viçosa, Viçosa 36570-000, Brazil
2
Department of Entomology, Federal University of Viçosa, Viçosa 36570-000, Brazil
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Agronomy 2021, 11(10), 2002; https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy11102002
Submission received: 12 September 2021 / Revised: 28 September 2021 / Accepted: 29 September 2021 / Published: 3 October 2021
(This article belongs to the Section Pest and Disease Management)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
The potential of insecticides that affect the growth and insect development to control Euprosterna elaeasa was evaluated. Fenoxycarb, methoxyfenozide, pyriproxyfen, and tebufenozide were assessed against E. elaeasa larvae for toxicity, survivorship, and feeding inhibition in the laboratory, and mortality in semifield conditions. Concentration–mortality bioassays demonstrated that insect growth regulators (IGRs) have a lethal effect on this insect, with pyriproxyfen (LC50 = 0.141 g L−1) being the most effective, followed by fenoxycarb (LC50 = 0.199 g L−1), methoxyfenozide (LC50 = 0.233 g L−1), and tebufenozide (LC50 = 0.259 g L−1). The survival rate was 99.8% in the control group, compared to 44.6%, 42.9%, 42.2%, and 39.5% in insects treated with pyriproxyfen, fenoxycarb, methoxyfenozide, and tebufenozide, respectively. IGRs caused feeding inhibition in E. elaeasa larvae 3 h after exposure. Furthermore, mortality in semifield conditions was similar to the results found in the laboratory. Our findings suggest that fenoxycarb, methoxyfenozide, pyriproxyfen, and tebufenozide are effective against E. elaeasa and, therefore, we confirm the potential of these IGRs for the control of this pest.

1. Introduction

Euprosterna elaeasa Dyar (Lepidoptera: Limacodidae) is a significantly harmful oil palm (Elaeis guineensis Jacq.) pest in South American countries [1]. This herbivore damages oil palm leaf and consumes an area of 400 mm2/larva, injuries are recognizable by the irregular cutting in foliar area and causing about 80% of defoliation [2]. Additionally, feeding activities of E. elaeasa larvae were implicated in assisting infection of Pestalotiopsis fungal species [3]. In commercial oil palm plantations, defoliation by insects causes up to 50% loss in harvest, by rasping the superficial foliar area or by consuming the parenchymal tissue, drastically reducing plant size, biomass, and palm oil production [4]. In this case, detrimental defoliation caused by E. elaeasa occurs on the top level of the canopy, and the palm trees require at least 3 years to recover the foliar area [2].
In South America, the utilization of pesticides is a widespread method to minimize the high pest populations and quick infestation of oil palm crops [5,6]. In this scenario, organophosphate insecticides such as acephate, metamidophos, and monocrotophos are applied through trunk injection in palm trees to control E. elaeasa [7]. However, minimal quantities of these insecticides were found in palm oil in a preliminary study [8]. Organophosphate insecticides have hazardous environmental effects such as agricultural and food contamination [9], ozone layer deterioration [10], residual long-term exposure [11], the development of target-site resistance and cross-resistance in pests [12], and limited safety to natural enemies, including predators and parasitoids [13]. More sustainable options for acephate, metamidophos, and monocrotophos are needed to avoid the organophosphate insecticides implemented for decades to control this insect [14]. Seeking environmentally friendly molecules and with low toxicity to non-target organisms to control E. elaeasa is essential considering the negative effects of the use of neurotoxic substances applied directly to oil palm [15,16].
The use of biorational agents is an important tool for the alternative management of oil palm pests [17] and their application was proven to reduce populations [18]. The current suite of biorational insecticides includes chitin synthesis inhibitors, ecdysone receptor agonists, and juvenile hormone mimics, distinguished by physiological activity interfering with the growth and development of insects [19,20,21]. The effects of these insecticides have been investigated to control oil palm pests such as Eupalamides cyparissias Fabricius (Lepidoptera: Castniidae) in Brazil [22], Leptopharsa gibbicarina Froeschner (Hemiptera: Tingidae) in Colombia [17], and Rhynchophorus ferrugineus Olivier (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) in Malaysia [23]. Insect growth regulators (IGRs) act in insect development and mediate the balance of ecdysone [21] or juvenile hormone [20]. Especially, IGRs play a role in insect physiological processes, altering specific pathways of hormonal control that are related to molting [24], metamorphosis [25], and normal development [26].
IGRs are chemical substances classified as juvenile hormone mimics and ecdysone disruptor agonists (Insecticide Resistance Action Committee; groups 7 and 18) [27]. Particularly, effective molecules such as fenoxycarb, methoxyfenozide, pyriproxyfen, and tebufenozide are used substantially to manage lepidopteran defoliating pests [20,21,24,25,26]. Different classes of neurotoxic insecticides are used to control E. elaeasa; however, the availability and use of biorational agents as ecdysone receptor agonists and juvenile hormone analogs is an option for insect pest management programs. We assumed that IGRs such as fenoxycarb, methoxyfenozide, pyriproxyfen, and tebufenozide would have suppressive effects on E. elaeasa larvae, which could be due to their capability to affect the survival, feeding, and development of this pest.
This research assessed the effects of fenoxycarb, methoxyfenozide, pyriproxyfen, and tebufenozide on E. elaeasa, evaluating their toxicity, survivorship, and feeding inhibition in the laboratory, and mortality in semifield conditions.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Insects

Adults of E. elaeasa (n = 3975; ♂ = 2134, ♀ = 1841) were collected from 5-year-old oil palm crops (07°20′ N, 73°54′ W) and brought to the Crop Protection Laboratory of the Monterrey Oil Palm AS Plantation (Puerto Wilches, Colombia) for rearing. Adults were fed a liquid diet composed of 25% honey, 25% sucrose, and 50% deionized distilled water (ddH2O) soaked in a cotton ball. For mating and reproduction, adults (one male and one female) of E. elaeasa were isolated in polystyrene boxes (35 × 35 × 35 cm) containing liquid diet and oil palm leaflets. For egg development, eggs laid on the leaflets were placed in Petri dishes (90 mm diameter) and maintained at 28 ± 2 °C, 79% ± 35% RH, and 12:12 h light/dark cycle until larva emergence. Emerged larvae were placed in polystyrene boxes (750 mL) and fed on oil palm leaflets. Healthy, 24 h old E. elaeasa third-instar larvae were used in the laboratory and semifield bioassays.

2.2. Concentration–Mortality Bioassay

Four IGRs were adjusted in 100 mL of ddH2O to obtain five dilutions (0.075, 0.15, 0.3, 0.6, and 1.2 g L−1): fenoxycarb (250 a.i. g L−1 Insegar WG, Syngenta Crop Protection AG, Panamá, Panamá), methoxyfenozide (240 a.i. g L−1 Intrepid SC, Dow Agrosciences LLC, Soledad, Colombia), pyriproxyfen (100 a.i. g L−1 Epingle SC, Summit Agro S.A.S., Bogotá, Colombia), and tebufenozide (240 a.i. g L−1 Confirm SC, Summit Agro S.A.S., Bogotá, Colombia). Serial dilutions of each IGR in addition to the control (only ddH2O) were prepared to evaluate toxicity and calculate the concentration–mortality relationship and lethal concentrations (LC25, LC50, LC75, and LC95). Subsequently, each insecticide dilution (1 µL) was applied to the thorax of 50 E. elaeasa larvae using a micropipette (Eppendorf®, Hamburg, Germany). After IGRs exposure, larvae were individualized in polystyrene boxes (13 × 17 cm), maintained in a climatized room, and fed with oil palm leaves. Three replicates with 40 larvae each were utilized for each of the five dilutions evaluated (600 larvae per IGR) and the number of dead larvae was counted after IGR exposure for 6 d.

2.3. Time–Mortality Bioassay

Euprosterna elaeasa larvae were topically exposed to the estimated lethal concentration (LC50 and LC95) of each IGR prepared in ddH2O. A control was performed using ddH2O. Similar exposure procedures were realized as described in the concentration–mortality bioassay. Three replicates of 40 larvae were utilized for each IGR lethal concentration and the number of live larva was registered every 8 h for 6 d.

2.4. Feeding Inhibition

Larvae of E. elaeasa were individualized in Petri dishes with a piece of oil palm leaf treated with LC50 or LC95 of each IGR and ddH2O as the control. Leaves were obtained from 6-year-old oil palms and cut into pieces (10 mm2), sterilized with 2.5% sodium hypochlorite, washed three times with ddH2O, and air-dried. Subsequently, the leaf pieces were immersed for 20 s in a solution of the LC50 and LC90 of each IGR or control, air-dried for 10 min, and the larvae were in contact with the leaf piece for 3 h. The area consumed by each insect was photographed with a D40 Nikon digital camera (Nikon Corporation, Tokyo, Japan) equipped with a 150 mm macrofocus and SB-700 Speedlight flash. The images were analyzed using the digital analysis software QUANT v. 1.0 (Federal University of Viçosa, Viçosa, Brazil). The leaf area consumed by E. elaeasa was measured in mm2 with pixels based on the RGB histogram (red, 743 nm; green, 525 nm; blue, 417 nm). Twenty repetitions per lethal concentration of each IGR and control were performed.

2.5. Mortality in Semifield Conditions

The experiment was performed in 6-year-old oil palm crops (ASD, cv Dura × Pisifera) in Monterrey Oil Palm AS Plantation, with an average temperature of 28.17 °C, 73–87% relative humidity, 1545–2127 h annual sunlight, and 2176 mm annual rainfall. Palm trees (n = 100, 20 per treatment) were selected and 40 E. elaeasa larvae were placed on a leaf (no. 17, in accordance with the phyllotaxy position) of each palm tree [28] and enclosed in organza fabric (0.75 × 1.5 m) for 24 h to guarantee natural relocation. IGRs prepared to the LC95 level in ddH2O in addition to the control (only ddH2O) were used as treatments with five replications. After 1 d of larvae isolated in organza fabric, 250 mL of each treatment (IGRs or control) was sprayed on both sides of the leaf with a Royal Condor® pump spray (Soacha, Colombia). Organza fabric pieces were removed before treatment application and again placed until the final experiment duration. Oil palm leaves were carefully cut and the number of dead E. elaeasa larvae was quantified. Larval mortality caused by IGRs or control was registered for 6 d.

2.6. Statistical Analysis

The concentration–mortality data were submitted to Probit analysis. Kaplan–Meier survival analysis and the log-rank test were used to compare time–mortality data between IGRs and curves plotted with Prism 8.0 software [29]. Data on the anti-feeding effect and mortality in semifield conditions were arcsine-transformed and submitted to one-way analysis of variance, while Tukey’s HSD (p < 0.05) test was also used to compare means. Concentration–mortality, antifeeding effect, and mortality in semifield assay data were analyzed with SAS 9.0 software [30].

3. Results

3.1. Concentration–Mortality Bioassay

The mortality data were suitable for a Probit model fit (p > 0.05), showing IGRs toxicity to E. elaeasa and allowing us to estimate lethal concentrations (Table 1). For the estimated LC50, testing showed that pyriproxyfen with LC50 = 0.141 (0.117–0.171) g L−1 and fenoxycarb with LC50 = 0.199 (0.162–0.241) g L−1 were the most effective IGRs for E. elaeasa, followed by methoxyfenozide with LC50 = 0.233 (0.188–0.285) g L−1, and tebufenozide with LC50 = 0.259 (0.217–0.308) g L−1. Mortality was 0.1% in the control group.

3.2. Time–Mortality Bioassay

The IGRs significantly reduced E. elaeasa survival rates after 6 d exposure and were differentially at LC50 (log-rank test, χ2 = 16.97; df = 4; p < 0.001) (Figure 1A). Euprosterna elaeasa survival declined from 99.8% in the control to 44.6% with tebufenozide, 42.9% with methoxyfenozide, 42.2% with fenoxycarb, and 39.5% with pyriproxyfen. Euprosterna elaeasa survival was significantly impaired by IGRs at LC95 (log-rank test, χ2 = 18.52; df = 4; p < 0.001; Figure 1B). Euprosterna elaeasa survival declined from 99.8% in the control to 35.2% with methoxyfenozide, 31.7% with tebufenozide, 26.3% with fenoxycarb, and 9.61% with pyriproxyfen.

3.3. Feeding Inhibition

The IGRs caused feeding inhibition in E. elaeasa larvae, with lower leaf area consumed compared to the control (Figure 2). Food consumption by E. elaeasa was significantly different between the IGRs at LC50 (F = 31.24; df = 4,19; p < 0.001), reducing from 21.8 mm2 in the control to 17.1 mm2 with fenoxycarb, 15.8 mm2 with pyriproxyfen, 12.4 mm2 with methoxyfenozide, and 6.81 mm2 with tebufenozide. For LC95, the area consumed by E. elaeasa differed between IGRs (F = 39.02; df = 4,19; p < 0.001), reducing from 22.1 mm2 in the control to 15.2 mm2 with fenoxycarb, 13.8 mm2 with pyriproxyfen, 9.13 mm2 with methoxyfenozide, and 3.22 mm2 with tebufenozide.

3.4. Mortality in Semifield Conditions

The mortality caused by the IGRs tested on E. elaeasa larvae in field conditions was variable (F = 31.36; df = 4, 19; p < 0.001; Figure 3). High larval mortality was caused by tebufenozide at 89.6% ± 4.9% and methoxyfenozide at 87.4% ± 4.7%, followed by pyriproxyfen at 79.4% ± 3.8% and fenoxycarb at 79.4% ± 3.9%. Mortality was 3.67% ± 0.5% in the control.

4. Discussion

The effectiveness of the four IGRs used in this research was investigated; they caused mortality, lower survival rates, feeding inhibition, and reduced E. elaeasa populations. Fenoxycarb, methoxyfenozide, pyriproxyfen, and tebufenozide are toxic to E. elaeasa larvae and have a strong effect through topical exposure. IGRs lead to E. elaeasa mortality in a concentration-dependent manner, as observed in other pests [21,26,31,32]. However, E. elaeasa exposed to fenoxycarb and pyriproxyfen were more susceptible than when exposed to methoxyfenozide and tebufenozide. Therefore, a critical concentration of methoxyfenozide and tebufenozide is required for effective lethality, presumably to overcome insect growth regulation during contact and cuticle penetration. These results indicate that the effects produced by fenoxycarb, methoxyfenozide, pyriproxyfen, and tebufenozide present differences when mediating the physiology of E. elaeasa larvae. IGR classes (ecdysone receptor agonists and juvenile hormone analogs) express and exert wide endocrinal imbalances, including insect hormones (20-hydroxyecdysone (20HE), ecdysone (Ec), and juvenile hormone (JH)) involved in the epidermal cells reprogramming to produce specific proteins for the next instar/stage and completion of the molting and metamorphosis processes [24,25,26]. A set of study results point to disruption of the growth and development of lepidopteran pests such as Anticarsia gemmatalis Hübner (Noctuidae) when exposed to tebufenozide [21], Choristoneura rosaceana Harris (Tortricidae) when exposed to pyriproxyfen [31], Lymantria dispar Linnaeus (Erebidae) when exposed to methoxyfenozide [26], and Plutella xylostella Linnaeus (Plutellidae) when exposed to fenoxycarb [32]. In general, IGRs exhibit toxic effects against E. elaeasa larvae, which increase at higher insecticide concentrations.
The significant time variations in E. elaeasa survival are produced by the interaction of IGRs attaching to the exoskeleton, penetrating in the hemocoel and being transported by hemolymph, and perturbing the hormonal balance. The time taken for fenoxycarb, methoxyfenozide, pyriproxyfen, and tebufenozide to induce mortality in E. elaeasa, from 3 to 6 days, presents slow action on the larva of this pest. In the present research, the comparative effects of the IGRs on E. elaeasa were observed at different time periods. These time differences commonly occur due to IGRs’ ability to disrupt embryonic development and deform neonates [33], by causing lethal ecdysis deficiencies in instar larval development [34], by inducing morphological epidermal cell alterations [35], and by producing supernumerary molts [36], leading to delayed pupation and adult emergence [37]. Moreover, IGRs were found to inhibit feeding or insect reproduction, and subsequently, interrupt the life cycle [38]. High E. elaeasa survival for extended periods suggests that fenoxycarb, methoxyfenozide, pyriproxyfen, and tebufenozide cause adverse effects on larvae via reduction in the insect population. Thus, they may represent a valuable method to avoid the use of neurotoxic substances to control E. elaeasa.
Euprosterna elaeasa showed a low consumption of oil palm leaves treated with IGRs, suggesting an antifeeding effect. IGRs with antifeeding effects play an important role in herbivorous pests, causing responses such as feeding inhibition, distortions in the midgut histology, and low nutrient absorption [21,39]. In this research, the effect on feeding inhibition by both LC50 and LC90 suggests that the intoxication effect of IGRs is cumulative. Especially, our findings show that methoxyfenozide and tebufenozide cause further cessation in feeding of E. elaeasa larvae in comparison with fenoxycarb and pyriproxyfen. Feeding inhibition after exposure to methoxyfenozide and tebufenozide has been also reported in lepidopteran pests, including Rachiplusia nu Gueene (Noctuidae) [40] and Orgyia pseudotsugata (McDunnough) (Erebidae) [41]. In contrast, moderate feeding inhibition after exposure to fenoxycarb and pyriproxyfen has been reported in Abraxas suspecta Warren (Geometridae) [42] and Spodoptera litoralis Boisduval (Noctuidae) [43], respectively. The findings obtained here of a reduction in food consumption by E. elaeasa larvae, in both lethal concentrations, indicates a possible poisoning per os, perhaps due to alterations in the midgut [21], affecting digestive enzymes secretion [44] and energy metabolism [45] with possible suppression of the detoxification response [43,46], as observed in other insects after oral insecticide exposure [47,48,49,50,51]. In summary, the reduction in food consumption caused by IGRs on treated E. elaeasa larvae suggests feeding inhibition impairing the digestive process.
Fenoxycarb, methoxyfenozide, pyriproxyfen, and tebufenozide showed lethality against E. elaeasa in oil palm leaves in the field, and the findings are consistent with those found in the laboratory. However, the mortality rate at the larval stage was lower than that obtained under laboratory conditions. Additionally, the findings show that methoxyfenozide and tebufenozide affect a high number of E. elaeasa larvae. It is possible that the efficacy of IGRs under field conditions is due to climatic factors [52], translaminar action [53], chemical degradation [54], and the persistence of biorational insecticides in foliage [17]. However, while it is difficult to accurately determine the quantity of insecticide penetrating (by contact or ingestion) each insect, mortality caused by IGRs on E. elaeasa was similar to that found with topical application in the concentration–mortality bioassay. The lethality of IGRs and their effectiveness has also been observed with other defoliating pests under field conditions, justifying them as potent bio-rational agents against defoliating pests that can be incorporated in several agricultural systems [24,25,26,40,41,42,43]. The findings demonstrate that these IGRs have a specific mode of action as insecticides affecting a high number of E. elaeasa larvae. In particular, methoxyfenozide and tebufenozide are the most effective in the field and the maximum efficiency from IGRs should be used during the larval stage. Testing with these IGRs suggests that applications can dramatically decrease E. elaeasa infestation and are an essential element to protect oil palm leaves.

5. Conclusions

The suppressive effects of four IGRs on E. elaeasa were investigated. In the laboratory, fenoxycarb and pyriproxyfen were more toxic than methoxyfenozide and tebufenozide; however, tebufenozide and pyriproxyfen drastically affected the survival of this pest through contact exposure at different lethal concentrations. For oral exposure, methoxyfenozide and tebufenozide were more effective in causing feeding inhibition of this insect compared to fenoxycarb and pyriproxyfen. In semifield conditions, methoxyfenozide and tebufenozide caused high mortality after contact/oral exposure, increasing E. elaeasa mortality through two routes (dermal and ingestion) of exposure, with the potential to control its field populations. The toxicity caused by these IGRs provides a powerful tool to manage E. elaeasa larvae and reduce the insect’s damage to oil palm leaves. In the field, E. elaeasa was highly susceptible to IGRs, which can be alternatives to replace organophosphate insecticides, directly reducing the defoliation and indirectly reducing the Pestalotiopsis infection caused by feeding activities of this pest in oil palm.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.P.-R., J.E.S. and L.C.M.; methodology, A.P.-R., J.E.S. and L.C.M.; formal analysis, A.P.-R., J.E.S. and L.C.M.; investigation, A.P.-R., J.E.S. and L.C.M.; resources, A.P.-R., J.E.S. and L.C.M.; writing, A.P.-R., J.E.S. and L.C.M.; supervision, A.P.-R., J.E.S. and L.C.M.; project administration, A.P.-R., J.E.S. and L.C.M.; funding acquisition, A.P.-R., J.E.S. and L.C.M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was supported by Brazilian research agencies Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq) (grant number 305165/2013-5), Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES) (grant number 2815/11), and Fundação de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado de Minas Gerais (FAPEMIG) (grant number APQ-01079-13).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable for studies not involving humans or animals.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable for studies not involving humans.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to the Monterrey Oil Palm Plantation S.A. (Colombia) for technical assistance.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no competing interest.

References

  1. Genty, P.; Desmier de Chenon, R.; Morin, J.P. Les ravageurs du palmier a huile en Amerique latine. Oléagineux 1978, 33, 325–419. [Google Scholar]
  2. Alvarado, H.; de La Torre, R.A.; Barrera, E.; Martínez, L.; Bustillo, A. Ciclo de vida y tasa de consumo de Euprosterna elaeasa Dyar (Lepidoptera: Limacodidae) defoliador de la palma de aceite. Rev. Palmas 2014, 35, 41–51. [Google Scholar]
  3. Martínez, L.C.; Plata-Rueda, A. Lepidoptera vectors of Pestalotiopsis fungal disease: First records in oil palm plantations from Colombia. Int. J. Trop. Insect Sci. 2013, 33, 239–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Martínez, L.C.; Plata-Rueda, A.; Serrao, J.E.; Zanuncio, J.C. Life history traits and damage potential of an invasive pest Acharia fusca (Lepidoptera: Limacodidae) on oil palm. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 2014, 107, 1086–1093. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Martínez, L.C.; Plata-Rueda, A.; Zanuncio, J.C.; Serrão, J.E. Comparative toxicity of six insecticides on the rhinoceros beetle (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae). Fla. Entomol. 2014, 97, 1056–1062. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Martínez, L.C.; Plata-Rueda, A.; Rodríguez-Dimaté, F.A.; Campos, J.M.; Santos Júnior, V.C.D.; Rolim, G.D.S.; Fernandes, F.L.; Silva, W.M.; Wilcken, C.F.; Zanuncio, J.C.; et al. Exposure to insecticides reduces populations of Rhynchophorus palmarum in oil palm plantations with Bud Rot disease. Insects 2019, 10, 111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Reyes, A.R.; Cruz, M.A.; Genty, P. The root absorption technique for controlling oil-palm pests. Oléagineux 1988, 43, 363–370. [Google Scholar]
  8. Yeoh, C.B.; Kuntom, A.; Dorasamy, S.; Omar, M.R.; Nor, M.Y.M.; Noh, M.R.M. Determination of acephate, methamidophos and monocrotophos in crude palm oil. Eur. J. Lipid Sci. Technol. 2006, 108, 960–964. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Goulson, D. An overview of the environmental risks posed by neonicotinoid insecticides. J. Appl. Ecol. 2013, 50, 977–987. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Last, J.M. Global change: Ozone depletion, greenhouse warming, and public health. Annu. Rev. Public Health 1993, 14, 115–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Shipp, J.L.; Wang, K.; Ferguson, G. Residual toxicity of avermectin b1 and pyridaben to eight commercially produced beneficial arthropod species used for control of greenhouse pests. Biol. Control 2000, 17, 125–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Samantsidis, G.R.; O’Reilly, A.O.; Douris, V.; Vontas, J. Functional validation of target-site resistance mutations against sodium channel blocker insecticides (SCBIs) via molecular modeling and genome engineering in Drosophila. Insect Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2019, 104, 73–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Martínez, L.C.; Plata-Rueda, A.; da Silva Neves, G.; Gonçalves, W.G.; Zanuncio, J.C.; Bozdoğan, H.; Serrão, J.E. Permethrin induces histological and cytological changes in the midgut of the predatory bug, Podisus nigrispinus. Chemosphere 2018, 212, 629–637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Martínez, O.L.; Plata-Rueda, A.; Martínez, L.C. Oil palm plantations as an agroecosystem: Impact on integrated pest management and pesticide use. Outlooks Pest Manag. 2013, 24, 225–229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Plata-Rueda, A.; Quintero, H.A.; Serrão, J.E.; Martínez, L.C. Insecticidal activity of Bacillus thuringiensis strains on the nettle caterpillar, Euprosterna elaeasa (Lepidoptera: Limacodidae). Insects 2020, 11, 310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Martínez, L.C.; Plata-Rueda, A.; Ramírez, A.; Serrão, J.E. Susceptibility of Demotispa neivai (Ceoleoptera Chrysomelidae) to Beauveria bassiana and Metarhizium anisopliae entomopathogenic fungal isolates. Pest Manag.Sci. 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Martínez, L.C.; Plata-Rueda, A.; Serrão, J.E. Effect of benzoylphenyl ureas on survival and reproduction of the lace bug, Leptopharsa gibbicarina. Insects 2021, 12, 34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Amaral, K.D.; Martínez, L.C.; Lima, M.A.P.; Serrão, J.E.; Della Lucia, T.M.C. Azadirachtin impairs egg production in Atta sexdens leaf-cutting ant queens. Environ. Pollut. 2018, 243, 809–814. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Fiaz, M.; Martínez, L.C.; Plata-Rueda, A.; Cossolin, J.F.S.; Serra, R.S.; Martins, G.F.; Serrão, J.E. Behavioral and ultrastructural effects of novaluron on Aedes aegypti larvae. Infect. Genet. Evol. 2021, 93, 104974. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Fiaz, M.; Martínez, L.C.; Plata-Rueda, A.; Gonçalves, W.G.; de Souza, D.L.L.; Cossolin, J.F.S.; Carvalho, P.E.G.R.; Martins, G.F.; Serrão, J.E. Pyriproxyfen, a juvenile hormone analog, damages midgut cells and interferes with behaviors of Aedes aegypti larvae. PeerJ 2019, 7, e7489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Fiaz, M.; Martínez, L.C.; Plata-Rueda, A.; Gonçalves, W.G.; Shareef, M.; Zanuncio, J.C.; Serrão, J.E. Toxicological and morphological effects of tebufenozide on Anticarsia gemmatalis (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) larvae. Chemosphere 2018, 212, 337–345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Müller, A.; Silva, A.D.B.; de Souza, L.A.; Buecke, J.; Guimarães, L.G.; Silva, J.D.O.; Vale, M.P.D.; Lins, P.M.P.; Ohashi, O.S. Controle químico de lagartas de Eupalamides dedalus em dendezeiros. Embrapa Amaz. Orient. Comun. Técnico 2000, 38, 1–4. [Google Scholar]
  23. Llácer, E.; Dembilio, O.; Jacas, J.A. Evaluation of the efficacy of an insecticidal paint based on chlorpyrifos and pyriproxyfen in a microencapsulated formulation against Rhynchophorus ferrugineus (Coleoptera: Curculionidae). J. Econ. Entomol. 2010, 103, 402–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Zhang, W.; Ma, L.; Liu, X.; Peng, Y.; Liang, G.; Xiao, H. Dissecting the roles of FTZ-F1 in larval molting and pupation, and the sublethal effects of methoxyfenozide on Helicoverpa armigera. Pest Manag. Sci. 2020, 77, 1328–1338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. El-Sheikh, E.A.; Kamita, S.G.; Hammock, B.D. Effects of juvenile hormone (JH) analog insecticides on larval development and JH esterase activity in two spodopterans. Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 2016, 128, 30–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Zhang, G.; Zou, H.; Geng, N.; Ding, N.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, J.; Zoua, C. Fenoxycarb and methoxyfenozide (RH-2485) affected development and chitin synthesis through disturbing glycometabolism in Lymantria dispar larvae. Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 2020, 163, 64–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Sparks, T.C.; Crossthwaite, A.L.; Nauen, R.; Banbad, S.; Cordova, D.; Earley, F.; Ebbinghaus-Kintscher, U.; Fujioka, S.; Hirao, A.; Karmon, D.; et al. Insecticides, biologics and nematicides: Updates to IRAC’s mode of action classification–a tool for resistance management. Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 2020, 167, 104587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Martínez, L.C.; Plata-Rueda, A.; Zanuncio, J.C.; Serrão, J.E. Leucothyreus femoratus (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae): Feeding and behavioral activities as an oil palm defoliator. Fla. Entomol. 2013, 96, 55–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. GraphPad Prism User Guide, 2015. GraphPad Software, Inc. Available online: http://www.graphpad.com/guides/prism/6/user-guide/ (accessed on 15 December 2015).
  30. SAS Institute. The SAS System for Windows, Release 9.0.; SAS Institute: Cary, NC, USA, 2002; Available online: http://www.sas.com (accessed on 6 January 2003).
  31. Sial, A.A.; Brunner, J.F. Lethal and sublethal effects of an insect growth regulator, pyriproxyfen, on obliquebanded leafroller (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae). J. Econ. Entomol. 2010, 103, 340–347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Mahmoudvand, M.; Moharramipour, S. Sublethal effects of fenoxycarb on the Plutella xylostella (Lepidoptera: Plutellidae). J. Insect Sci. 2015, 15, 82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Boina, D.R.; Rogers, M.E.; Wang, N.; Stelinski, L.L. Effect of pyriproxyfen, a juvenile hormone mimic, on egg hatch, nymph development, adult emergence and reproduction of the asian citrus psyllid, Diaphorina citri Kuwayama. Pest Manag. Sci. 2010, 66, 349–357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Smagghe, G.; Dhadialla, T.S.; Lezzi, M. Comparative toxicity and ecdysone receptor affinity of non-steroidal ecdysone agonists and 20-hydroxyecdysone in Chironomus tentans. Insect Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2002, 32, 187–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Jindra, M.; Bittova, L. The juvenile hormone receptor as a target of juvenoid “insect growth regulators”. Arch. Insect Biochem. Physiol. 2020, 103, e21615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  36. Mauchamp, B.; Malosse, C.; Saroglia, P. Biological effects and metabolism of fenoxycarb after treatment of the fourth and the fifth instars of the tobacco budworm, Heliothis virescens F. Pestic. Sci. 1989, 26, 283–301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Ono, E.K.; Zanardi, O.Z.; Santos, K.F.A.; Yamamoto, P.T. Susceptibility of Ceraeochrysa cubana larvae and adults to six insect growth regulator insecticides. Chemosphere 2017, 168, 49–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Critchley, B.R.; Campion, D.G. Effects of a juvenile hormone analogue on growth and reproduction in the cotton stainer Dysdercus fasciatus Say. Bull. Entomol. Res. 2009, 61, 49–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Farder-Gomes, C.; Saravanan, M.; Martínez, L.C.; Plata-Rueda, A.; Zanuncio, J.C.; Serrão, J.E. Azadirachtin affects the respiration and digestion in Anticarsia gemmatalis caterpillars. Toxin Rev. 2021, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Rimoldi, F.; Fogel, M.N.; Schneider, M.I.; Ronco, A.E. Lethal and sublethal effects of cypermethrin and methoxyfenozide on the larvae of Rachiplusia nu (Guenee) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Invertebr. Reprod. Dev. 2012, 56, 200–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Cook, S.P. Laboratory and field evaluation of tebufenozide, diflubenzuron, and Bacillus thurengiensis var. kurstaki for suppression of Douglas-fir tussock moth (Orgyia pseudotsugata (McDunnough)) in Idaho: A case study. J. Econ. Entomol. 2003, 96, 396–400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Jiang, Z.; Shang, Z.; Zhao, S.; Chiu, S. The relationship between insect growth regulators with juvenile hormone activity and insect feeding behavioural response. Insect Sci. 1999, 6, 71–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Nasr, H.M.; Badawy, M.E.; Rabea, E.I. Toxicity and biochemical study of two insect growth regulators, buprofezin and pyriproxyfen, on cotton leafworm Spodoptera littoralis. Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 2010, 98, 198–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Santos Junior, V.C.; Martínez, L.C.; Plata-Rueda, A.; Fernandes, F.L.; Tavares, W.S.; Zanuncio, J.C.; Serrão, J.E. Histopathological and cytotoxic changes induced by spinosad on midgut cells of the non-target predator Podisus nigrispinus Dallas (Heteroptera: Pentatomidae). Chemosphere 2020, 238, 124585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Plata-Rueda, A.; Martínez, L.C.; Da Silva, B.K.R.; Zanuncio, J.C.; Sena Fernandes, M.E.; Serrão, J.E.; Guedes, R.N.C.; Fernandes, F.L. Exposure to cyantraniliprole causes mortality and disturbs behavioral and respiratory response in the coffee berry borer (Hypothenemus hampei). Pest Manag. Sci. 2019, 75, 2236–2241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  46. Zhou, Y.; Qin, D.-Q.; Zhang, P.-W.; Liu, B.-J.; Chen, X.-T.; Zhang, Z.-X. The comparative metabolic response of Bactrocera dorsalis larvae to azadirachtin, pyriproxyfen and tebufenozide. Ecotox. Environ. Saf. 2020, 189, 110020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Castro, B.M.D.C.; Martinez, L.C.; Barbosa, S.G.; Serrão, J.E.; Wilcken, C.F.; Soares, M.A.; Silva, A.A.D.; Carvalho, A.G.D.; Zanuncio, J.C. Toxicity and cytopathology mediated by Bacillus thuringiensis in the midgut of Anticarsia gemmatalis (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 6667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Castro, B.M.C.; Martínez, L.C.; Plata-Rueda, A.; Soares, M.A.; Wilcken, C.F.; Zanuncio, A.J.V.; Fiaz, M.; Zanuncio, J.C.; Serrão, J.E. Exposure to chlorantraniliprole reduces locomotion, respiration, and causes histological changes in the midgut of velvetbean caterpillar Anticarsia gemmatalis (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Chemosphere 2021, 263, 128008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Fiaz, M.; Martínez, L.C.; da Silva Costa, M.; Cossolin, J.F.S.; Plata-Rueda, A.; Gonçalves, W.G.; Sant’Ana, A.E.G.; Zanuncio, J.C.; Serrão, J.E. Squamocin induce histological and ultrastructural changes in the midgut cells of Anticarsia gemmatalis (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2018, 156, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Plata-Rueda, A.; Menezes, C.H.M.; Cunha, W.S.; Alvarenga, T.M.; Barbosa, B.F.; Zanuncio, J.C.; Martínez, L.C.; Serrão, J.E. Side-effects caused by chlorpyrifos in the velvetbean caterpillar Anticarsia gemmatalis (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Chemosphere 2020, 259, 127530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Vinha, G.L.; Plata-Rueda, A.; Soares, M.A.; Zanuncio, J.C.; Serrão, J.E.; Martínez, L.C. Deltamethrin-mediated effects on locomotion, respiration, feeding, and histological changes in the midgut of Spodoptera frugiperda Caterpillars. Insects 2021, 12, 483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Guillebeau, L.P.; All, J.N.; Javid, A.M. Influence of weather on efficacy of pyrethroid insecticides for boll weevil (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) and bollworm (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) in cotton. J. Econ. Entomol. 1989, 82, 291–296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Hayasaka, D.; Korenaga, T.; Sánchez-Bayo, F.; Goka, K. Differences in ecological impacts of systemic insecticides with different physicochemical properties on biocenosis of experimental paddy fields. Ecotoxicology 2012, 21, 191–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Kitsiou, V.; Filippidis, N.; Mantzavinos, D.; Poulios, I. Heterogeneous and homogeneous photocatalytic degradation of the insecticide imidacloprid in aqueous solutions. Appl. Catal. 2009, 86, 27–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Agronomy 11 02002 g001 550
Figure 1. Kaplan–Meier survival curves for contact exposure of Euprosterna elaeasa larvae with insect growth regulators (IGRs) at different lethal concentrations: (A) LC50 and (B) LC95.
Figure 1. Kaplan–Meier survival curves for contact exposure of Euprosterna elaeasa larvae with insect growth regulators (IGRs) at different lethal concentrations: (A) LC50 and (B) LC95.
Agronomy 11 02002 g001
Agronomy 11 02002 g002 550
Figure 2. Leaf consumption (mean ± SEM) by Euprosterna elaeasa larvae exposed to insect growth regulators (IGRs): (A) LC50 and (B) LC95. Treatments means with different letters show significant differences by Tukey’s HSD test at the p < 0.05 level.
Figure 2. Leaf consumption (mean ± SEM) by Euprosterna elaeasa larvae exposed to insect growth regulators (IGRs): (A) LC50 and (B) LC95. Treatments means with different letters show significant differences by Tukey’s HSD test at the p < 0.05 level.
Agronomy 11 02002 g002
Agronomy 11 02002 g003 550
Figure 3. Mortality (mean ± SEM) of Euprosterna elaeasa larvae caused by insect growth regulators (IGRs) applied on oil palm leaves in field conditions. Treatments means with different letters show significant differences by Tukey’s HSD test at the p < 0.05 level.
Figure 3. Mortality (mean ± SEM) of Euprosterna elaeasa larvae caused by insect growth regulators (IGRs) applied on oil palm leaves in field conditions. Treatments means with different letters show significant differences by Tukey’s HSD test at the p < 0.05 level.
Agronomy 11 02002 g003
Table
Table 1. Toxicity of insect growth regulators (IGRs) by contact exposure on Euprosterna elaeasa larvae (df = 5). Lethal concentration (LC) values were estimated based on concentration–mortality bioassay using Probit analysis. EC, estimated concentration; CI, confidence interval.
Table 1. Toxicity of insect growth regulators (IGRs) by contact exposure on Euprosterna elaeasa larvae (df = 5). Lethal concentration (LC) values were estimated based on concentration–mortality bioassay using Probit analysis. EC, estimated concentration; CI, confidence interval.
IGRsNo. InsectsLCEC (g L−1)95% CI (g L−1)Slope ± SEχ2 (p-Value)
Fenoxycarb120LC250.1090.079–0.1371.815 ± 0.231.66 (0.64)
120LC500.1990.162–0.241
120LC750.3630.297–0.470
120LC950.8590.630–1.378
Methoxyfenozide120LC250.1200.086–0.1521.486 ± 0.204.42 (0.21)
120LC500.2330.188–0.285
120LC750.4510.362–0.603
120LC951.1670.824–1.997
Pyriproxyfen120LC250.0790.061–0.0962.281 ± 0.296.23 (0.11)
120LC500.1410.117–0.171
120LC750.2510.204–0.333
120LC950.5780.419–0.942
Tebufenozide120LC250.1540.121–0.1851.760 ± 0.235.77 (0.12)
120LC500.2590.217–0.308
120LC750.4340.360–0.554
120LC950.9140.690–1.387
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Martínez, L.C.; Plata-Rueda, A.; Serrão, J.E. Effects of Insect Growth Regulators on Mortality, Survival, and Feeding of Euprosterna elaeasa (Lepidoptera: Limacodidae) Larvae. Agronomy 2021, 11, 2002. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy11102002

AMA Style

Martínez LC, Plata-Rueda A, Serrão JE. Effects of Insect Growth Regulators on Mortality, Survival, and Feeding of Euprosterna elaeasa (Lepidoptera: Limacodidae) Larvae. Agronomy. 2021; 11(10):2002. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy11102002

Chicago/Turabian Style

Martínez, Luis Carlos, Angelica Plata-Rueda, and José Eduardo Serrão. 2021. "Effects of Insect Growth Regulators on Mortality, Survival, and Feeding of Euprosterna elaeasa (Lepidoptera: Limacodidae) Larvae" Agronomy 11, no. 10: 2002. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy11102002

APA Style

Martínez, L. C., Plata-Rueda, A., & Serrão, J. E. (2021). Effects of Insect Growth Regulators on Mortality, Survival, and Feeding of Euprosterna elaeasa (Lepidoptera: Limacodidae) Larvae. Agronomy, 11(10), 2002. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy11102002

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop