Next Article in Journal
Palladium-Based Catalysts as Electrodes for Direct Methanol Fuel Cells: A Last Ten Years Review
Next Article in Special Issue
One-Pot Two-Step Organocatalytic Asymmetric Synthesis of Spirocyclic Piperidones via Wolff Rearrangement–Amidation–Michael–Hemiaminalization Sequence
Previous Article in Journal
Controlling Active Site Loop Dynamics in the (β/α)8 Barrel Enzyme Indole-3-Glycerol Phosphate Synthase
Previous Article in Special Issue
Solvent-Free Selective Condensations Based on the Formation of the Olefinic (C=C) Bond Catalyzed by Organocatalyst
Open AccessFeature PaperLetter

Organocatalysis: Fundamentals and Comparisons to Metal and Enzyme Catalysis

1
Swiss Institute of Technology (EPFL), Lausanne 1015, Switzerland
2
Ecole Normale Supérieure de Chimie de Montpellier, 8, rue de l’école normale, F 34296 Montpellier, Cedex 5, France
3
Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA), Los Angeles, CA 90095-1569
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Academic Editor: Aurelio G. Csaky
Catalysts 2016, 6(9), 128; https://doi.org/10.3390/catal6090128
Received: 19 June 2016 / Revised: 16 July 2016 / Accepted: 22 July 2016 / Published: 26 August 2016
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Metal-free Organocatalysis)
Catalysis fulfills the promise that high-yielding chemical transformations will require little energy and produce no toxic waste. This message is carried by the study of the evolution of molecular catalysis of some of the most important reactions in organic chemistry. After reviewing the conceptual underpinnings of catalysis, we discuss the applications of different catalysts according to the mechanism of the reactions that they catalyze, including acyl group transfers, nucleophilic additions and substitutions, and C–C bond forming reactions that employ umpolung by nucleophilic additions to C=O and C=C double bonds. We highlight the utility of a broad range of organocatalysts other than compounds based on proline, the cinchona alkaloids and binaphthyls, which have been abundantly reviewed elsewhere. The focus is on organocatalysts, although a few examples employing metal complexes and enzymes are also included due to their significance. Classical Brønsted acids have evolved into electrophilic hands, the fingers of which are hydrogen donors (like enzymes) or other electrophilic moieties. Classical Lewis base catalysts have evolved into tridimensional, chiral nucleophiles that are N- (e.g., tertiary amines), P- (e.g., tertiary phosphines) and C-nucleophiles (e.g., N-heterocyclic carbenes). Many efficient organocatalysts bear electrophilic and nucleophilic moieties that interact simultaneously or not with both the electrophilic and nucleophilic reactants. A detailed understanding of the reaction mechanisms permits the design of better catalysts. Their construction represents a molecular science in itself, suggesting that sooner or later chemists will not only imitate Nature but be able to catalyze a much wider range of reactions with high chemo-, regio-, stereo- and enantioselectivity. Man-made organocatalysts are much smaller, cheaper and more stable than enzymes. View Full-Text
Keywords: acids; amphoteric compounds; asymmetric ion-pair catalysis; asymmetric synthesis; bases; bifunctional catalysts; catalytic enantioselective reactions; conjugate additions; crown ethers; cryptands; cycloadditions; cyclopentenes; electron-rich tertiary amines and phosphines; electrophilic activation; enantioselective electrophilic fluorination; encapsulation; enzymes; N-heterocyclic carbenes; hydrogen-bridging; β-lactams; nucleophilic activation; nucleophilic catalyst; phase transfer catalysis; l-proline; Umpolung acids; amphoteric compounds; asymmetric ion-pair catalysis; asymmetric synthesis; bases; bifunctional catalysts; catalytic enantioselective reactions; conjugate additions; crown ethers; cryptands; cycloadditions; cyclopentenes; electron-rich tertiary amines and phosphines; electrophilic activation; enantioselective electrophilic fluorination; encapsulation; enzymes; N-heterocyclic carbenes; hydrogen-bridging; β-lactams; nucleophilic activation; nucleophilic catalyst; phase transfer catalysis; l-proline; Umpolung
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Vogel, P.; Lam, Y.-h.; Simon, A.; Houk, K.N. Organocatalysis: Fundamentals and Comparisons to Metal and Enzyme Catalysis. Catalysts 2016, 6, 128. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal6090128

AMA Style

Vogel P, Lam Y-h, Simon A, Houk KN. Organocatalysis: Fundamentals and Comparisons to Metal and Enzyme Catalysis. Catalysts. 2016; 6(9):128. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal6090128

Chicago/Turabian Style

Vogel, Pierre; Lam, Yu-hong; Simon, Adam; Houk, Kendall N. 2016. "Organocatalysis: Fundamentals and Comparisons to Metal and Enzyme Catalysis" Catalysts 6, no. 9: 128. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal6090128

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Search more from Scilit
 
Search
Back to TopTop