Next Article in Journal
Microswimmer Propulsion by Two Steadily Rotating Helical Flagella
Next Article in Special Issue
Enhanced Photocatalytic Performance and Mechanism of Au@CaTiO3 Composites with Au Nanoparticles Assembled on CaTiO3 Nanocuboids
Previous Article in Journal
Fabrication of Adhesive Resistance Surface with Low Wettability on Ti6Al4V Alloys by Electro-Brush Plating
Previous Article in Special Issue
Construction of Z-Scheme g-C3N4/CNT/Bi2Fe4O9 Composites with Improved Simulated-Sunlight Photocatalytic Activity for the Dye Degradation
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Growth Process and CQDs-modified Bi4Ti3O12 Square Plates with Enhanced Photocatalytic Performance

Micromachines 2019, 10(1), 66; https://doi.org/10.3390/mi10010066
by Xinxin Zhao 1, Hua Yang 1,*, Ziming Cui 1, Xiangxian Wang 1 and Zao Yi 2
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Micromachines 2019, 10(1), 66; https://doi.org/10.3390/mi10010066
Submission received: 27 December 2018 / Revised: 9 January 2019 / Accepted: 16 January 2019 / Published: 18 January 2019
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Nanostructures for Photocatalysis)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

The authors report a comprehensive study to obtain CQDs-modified Bi4Ti3O12 square 3 plates with enhanced photocatalytic performance. The employed experimental techniques are fine and the discussion section is very well addressed.  The manuscript reports a substantial body of results and it seems a well done job.


Author Response

We thank very much the Reviewer for reviewing our manuscript and give a positive comment. We tried our best to polish the English language.

Reviewer 2 Report

In this manuscript the authors have presented their results on the newly synthesized carbon quantum dots-modified Bi4Ti3O12 square plates for the photocatalytic degradation of Rhodamine B as a model pollutant.   These synthesized materials were thoroughly characterized.  This is an interesting study in the field of nanotechnology and adds to the environmental remediation applications. It is a well written manuscript and a few minor suggestions are given below:

 

Table 1: It should be visible light instead of UV light

 

Table 1 and Fig. 4 can be placed after the Characterization data (Fig 5 – Fig 9).  

 


Author Response

We thank very much the Reviewer for reviewing our manuscript and give a positive comment. In Table 1, we corrected “UV light” to “visible light”. The main reason we placed Table 1 and Fig. 4 before the Characterization data was that we firstly determined the optimal composite sample and then made the corresponding characterization on it. We think readers can accept this arrangement of data and analyses. We tried our best to polish the English language.
Back to TopTop