Next Article in Journal
Vitamin D Supplementation: Practical Advice in Different Clinical Settings
Next Article in Special Issue
From Screen to Plate: How Instagram Cooking Videos Promote Healthy Eating Behaviours in Established Adulthood
Previous Article in Journal
Camel Milk Protein Ameliorates Ulcerative Colitis by Modulating Gut Microbiota and Amino Acid Metabolism
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

#WhatIEatinaDay: The Quality, Accuracy, and Engagement of Nutrition Content on TikTok

1
Nutrition and Dietetics, Susan Wakil School of Nursing and Midwifery, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2050, Australia
2
Charles Perkins Centre, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2050, Australia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Nutrients 2025, 17(5), 781; https://doi.org/10.3390/nu17050781
Submission received: 10 February 2025 / Revised: 21 February 2025 / Accepted: 21 February 2025 / Published: 24 February 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue The Impact of Social Media on Eating Behavior)

Abstract

Background: Social media platforms such as TikTok are significant sources of nutrition information for adolescents and young adults, who are vulnerable to unregulated, algorithm-driven content. This often spreads nutrition misinformation, impacting adolescent and young adult health and dietary behaviors. Objectives: While previous research has explored misinformation on other platforms, TikTok remains underexamined, so this study aimed at evaluating the landscape of nutrition-related content on TikTok. Methods: This study evaluated TikTok nutrition-related content by (1) identifying common nutrition topics and content creator types; (2) assessing the quality and accuracy of content using evidence-based frameworks, and (3) analyzing engagement metrics such as likes, comments, and shares. Results: The most common creators were health and wellness influencers (32%) and fitness creators (18%). Recipes (31%) and weight loss (34%) dominated the list of topics. When evaluating TikTok posts for quality, 82% of applicable posts lacked transparent advertising, 77% failed to disclose conflicts of interest, 63% promoted stereotypical attitudes, 55% did not provide evidence-based information, 75% lacked balanced and accurate content, and 90% failed to point out the risk and benefits of the advice presented. A total of 36% of posts were considered completely accurate, while 24% were mostly inaccurate, and 18% completely inaccurate. No statistical significance was associated between the level of accuracy or evidence and engagement metrics (p > 0.05). Conclusions: TikTok prioritizes engagement over accuracy, exposing adolescents to harmful nutrition misinformation. Stricter moderation and evidence-based nutrition content are essential to protect adolescent and young adult health. Future research should explore interventions to reduce the impact of misinformation on adolescent dietary behaviors and mental well-being.
Keywords: nutrition; misinformation; social media; engagement metrics; adolescents; young adults nutrition; misinformation; social media; engagement metrics; adolescents; young adults

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zeng, M.; Grgurevic, J.; Diyab, R.; Roy, R. #WhatIEatinaDay: The Quality, Accuracy, and Engagement of Nutrition Content on TikTok. Nutrients 2025, 17, 781. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu17050781

AMA Style

Zeng M, Grgurevic J, Diyab R, Roy R. #WhatIEatinaDay: The Quality, Accuracy, and Engagement of Nutrition Content on TikTok. Nutrients. 2025; 17(5):781. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu17050781

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zeng, Michelle, Jacqueline Grgurevic, Rayan Diyab, and Rajshri Roy. 2025. "#WhatIEatinaDay: The Quality, Accuracy, and Engagement of Nutrition Content on TikTok" Nutrients 17, no. 5: 781. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu17050781

APA Style

Zeng, M., Grgurevic, J., Diyab, R., & Roy, R. (2025). #WhatIEatinaDay: The Quality, Accuracy, and Engagement of Nutrition Content on TikTok. Nutrients, 17(5), 781. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu17050781

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop