Next Article in Journal
Therapeutic Effects of Plant Anthocyanin against Alzheimer’s Disease and Modulate Gut Health, Short-Chain Fatty Acids
Next Article in Special Issue
Serum Folate, Red Blood Cell Folate, and Zinc Serum Levels Are Related with Gestational Weight Gain and Offspring’s Birth-Weight of Adolescent Mothers
Previous Article in Journal
Ultrasound Cut-Off Values for Rectus Femoris for Detecting Sarcopenia in Patients with Nutritional Risk
Previous Article in Special Issue
Amino Acids during Pregnancy and Offspring Cardiovascular–Kidney–Metabolic Health
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Perinatal Outcomes of Diet Therapy in Gestational Diabetes Mellitus Diagnosed before 24 Gestational Weeks

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Keio University School of Medicine, 5 Shinanomachi, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo 160-8582, Japan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Nutrients 2024, 16(11), 1553; https://doi.org/10.3390/nu16111553
Submission received: 25 April 2024 / Revised: 15 May 2024 / Accepted: 18 May 2024 / Published: 21 May 2024

Abstract

:
To evaluate perinatal outcomes and risk factors for large for gestational age (LGA; birth weight over 90 percentile) in gestational diabetes diagnosed before 24 gestational weeks and treated with diet therapy alone until delivery (Diet Early gestational diabetes mellitus (Diet Early GDM)), we assessed the maternal characteristics and perinatal outcomes of patients with early GDM (n = 309) and normal glucose tolerance (NGT; n = 309) at Keio University Hospital. The gestational weight gain (GWG) expected at 40 weeks was significantly lower in the Diet Early GDM group than in the NGT group. The Diet Early GDM group exhibited a significantly lower incidence of low birth weight (<2500 g) and higher Apgar score at 5 min than the NGT group. Multiple logistic regression analysis revealed that the pre-pregnancy body mass index and GWG expected at 40 weeks were significantly associated with LGA for Diet Early GDM. No differences were observed in random plasma glucose levels in the first trimester, 75 g oral glucose tolerance test values, and initial increase or subsequent decrease between the two groups. Dietary early GDM did not exhibit a worse prognosis than NGT. To prevent LGA, it might be important to control maternal body weight not only during pregnancy but also before conception.

1. Introduction

Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is a high-incidence perinatal complication, and neonates born to mothers with GDM are at higher risk of large for gestational age (LGA: birthweight ≥ 90% percentile), macrosomia (birthweight ≥ 4000 g), neonatal hypoglycemia, and jaundice [1]. GDM is a prenatal metabolic disease that is treated with diet therapy, exercise, oral medications (e.g., sulfonylureas and metformin), and insulin. The first step in managing GDM is to recommend lifestyle changes, including nutrition and exercise, to improve hyperglycemia [2]. Nutritional management is considered fundamental for GDM management [3]. Several nutrition management guidelines recommend a caloric intake between 1500 and 2000 kcal/day, and a reduced calorie intake is recommended for overweight (pre-pregnancy body mass index [BMI]: 25 ≤ BMI < 30 kg/m2) and obese (pre-pregnancy BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2) mothers with GDM [4]. However, reduced calorie intake as a dietary therapy for mothers with GDM to improve short- and long-term prognoses remains unclear. Since diet therapy is the bedrock, in GDM that is diagnosed after 24 gestational weeks (Late GDM), the diet therapy group is usually considered to be a lower risk group for perinatal outcomes than the insulin therapy group. However, a Swedish population-based cohort study reported that the diet therapy group with Late GDM should not be managed as a low-risk group because it did not normalize the perinatal prognosis [5]. Therefore, patients with Late GDM treated with diet therapy alone should not be managed as a low-risk group.
Recently, GDM diagnosed in the second trimester has become the focus of perinatal management. In 2023, the Treatment of Booking Gestational Diabetes Mellitus (TOBOGM) trial, which evaluated the neonatal outcomes of GDM diagnosed before 20 gestational weeks, reported that adverse neonatal outcomes in the immediate treatment group were lower than those in the non-immediate treatment group [6]. In Japan, GDM is diagnosed before 24 weeks of gestation (Early GDM) and treated. Early GDM was diagnosed using the criteria published by the Japanese Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology and our hospital’s criteria described in our previous reports [7,8]. The pre-pregnancy BMI and incidence of a family history of diabetes in the Early GDM group were significantly higher than those in the Late GDM group [7]. Furthermore, the incidence of LGA and macrosomia in Early GDM was significantly higher than that in Late GDM [9,10]. Therefore, Early GDM is considered a higher-risk group than Late GDM. Because neonates with LGA and macrosomia have a higher risk of future obesity and metabolic syndrome [11], fetal overgrowth should be prevented. Diet therapy for GDM is required to ensure appropriate fetal growth as a consequence of appropriate maternal weight gain during pregnancy [3]. However, for Early GDM, suitable diet therapy for perinatal outcomes remains unknown, and perinatal outcomes of diet therapy have not been evaluated in Early GDM.
Therefore, we aimed to investigate perinatal outcomes and risk factors for LGA in patients with early GDM treated with diet therapy alone until delivery (Diet Early GDM).

2. Materials and Methods

This was a retrospective cohort study. Of the singleton expectant women who received perinatal care at Keio University Hospital between January 2013 and December 2021, 313 patients with early GDM who were treated with diet therapy alone until delivery and had normal glucose tolerance (NGT) were included in the study. The diagnostic criteria for GDM in this study are shown in Supplementary Figure S1 [7,8]. NGT was defined as expectant women who had a normal 50 g glucose challenge test (GCT), or abnormal 50 g GCT but a normal 75 g oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT), at 24–28 gestational weeks, and they were recruited from the perinatal database at our hospital during the same study period (n = 3269) by propensity score matching (PSM). The score was estimated using a logistic regression model and greedy matching (ratio of 1:1 and matching without replacement) with a caliper width and standard deviation of 0.20. The factors used for PSM were maternal age, parity, and pre-pregnancy BMI. Finally, the balance of each covariate between the early GDM and NGT groups was evaluated using standardized differences (between-group difference/pooled standard deviation). An absolute standardized difference value of <10% was considered a relatively small imbalance [12]. All study participants provided informed consent.
Management of Early GDM has been described in our previous reports. All expectant mothers with early GDM received diet therapy from nutritionists, including three meals and snacks. Capillary glucose profiles were obtained seven times per day under dietary management via self-monitored blood glucose measurements as follows: upon rising, 1 h pre-prandial for all planned meals, 2 h post-prandial, and at bedtime. The daily calorie intake for diet therapy at our hospital was then calculated as follows: early gestation, 30 kcal × standard body weight (SBW; calculated as maternal height [m] × maternal height [m] × 22 kg) + 150 kcal; late gestation, 30 kcal × SBW + 350 kcal; overweight and obese, 30 kcal × SBW throughout pregnancy [7]. The nutritional status of the Diet GDM group at the Keio University Hospital is shown in Supplementary Table S1. If the patient had a fasting plasma glucose level (PG) ≥ 100 mg/dL or 2 h PG after meal ≥ 120 mg/dL, insulin therapy was initiated to improve hyperglycemia. The initial increase, subsequent decrease, and gestational weight gain (GWG) expected at 40 weeks of gestation were calculated as previously described [13,14].
Data are presented as the median (range) or number (percentage). Continuous data were compared between groups using the Mann–Whitney U test. Categorical variables were analyzed using the chi-square test or Fisher’s exact test. The trend for the number of abnormal values in the 75 g OGTT was analyzed using Cochran–Armitage trend analysis. Multiple logistic regression analyses were performed to determine the relative contributions of parameters (p < 0.1) to LGA in the study participants and Diet Early GDM. Statistical analyses were performed using JMP software (ver. 17, SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA), and p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

3. Results

Based on the PSM adjusted for maternal age, parity, and pre-pregnancy BMI, we evaluated the maternal characteristics and perinatal outcomes between the Diet Early GDM (n = 309) and NGT (n = 309) groups (Table 1). The number of calorie intake categories for diet therapy in patients with Early GDM is shown in Supplementary Figure S1. The calorie intake during early gestation was between 1400 and 2100 kcal/day, between 1400 and 2300 kcal/day during late gestation. The GWG expected at 40 gestational weeks in the Diet Early GDM group was significantly lower than that of the NGT group (p = 0.0086). In perinatal outcomes, the incidence of low birth weight (<2500 g) in the NGT group was significantly lower than in the early GDM group (p = 0.0019), and the Apgar score at 5 min in the NGT group was significantly lower than in the early GDM group (p = 0.0006). No significant differences were found in other maternal and perinatal outcomes between the two groups.
The comparison of characteristics and perinatal outcomes between LGA and non-LGA among 618 mothers is presented in Table 2. The GWG expected at 40 gestational weeks and gestational weeks at delivery in LGA were significantly higher than those in non-LGA (p = 0.0009 and 0.0014, respectively). However, the incidence of Diet GDM was similar between the two groups (p = 0.40). Multiple logistic regression analysis revealed that pre-pregnancy BMI and expected GWG at 40 weeks were significantly associated with LGA (Table 3).
Comparisons between LGA and non-LGA infants in the early Diet GDM group are shown in Supplementary Table S2. Pre-pregnancy BMI, expected GWG at 40 gestational weeks, and gestational weeks at delivery are significantly higher in the non-LGA group (p = 0.017, 0.023, and 0.046, respectively). However, no differences were found in random PG in the first trimester, 75 g OGTT values, initial increase, or subsequent decrease between the two groups. Multiple logistic regression analysis revealed that pre-pregnancy BMI and expected GWG at 40 weeks are significantly associated with LGA in Diet Early GDM (Supplementary Table S3).

4. Discussion

The perinatal outcomes in the Diet Early GDM group were no worse than those in the patients with NGT selected using PMS. In this study, a higher GWG expected at 40 gestational weeks and GWG at delivery were risk factors for LGA.
Based on our data, Early GDM did not adversely affect perinatal outcomes, although Late GDM was associated with adverse perinatal outcomes in a previous report [5]. The Japanese GDM diagnostic criteria adopted cutoff values from the International Association of Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Group (IADPSG). However, IADPSG cutoff values are suitable for Late GDM and are used to diagnose Early GDM in Japan [15]. Of the mothers with abnormal 75 g OGTT values in the first trimester, approximately half did not have abnormal 75 g OGTT values when they repeated the 75 g OGTT between 24 and 28 gestational weeks [6,16]. No differences were found in perinatal outcomes between mothers with Late abnormal 75 g OGTT and those with Late normal 75 g OGTT among Ealy abnormal 75 g OGTT who deferred treatment for GDM in the TOBOGM study [17]. Differences in the perinatal outcomes of diet therapy between early and late GDM might be affected by these criteria. Asians, including Japanese, exhibit impaired insulin secretion, which is an important mechanism for GDM development [18,19,20,21,22]. There are many underweight (pre-pregnancy BMI < 18.5 kg/m2) cases with GDM in Japan [23]. Therefore, differences in maternal metabolic characteristics between Japanese and Caucasian populations may have affected the results. We need to reconsider which mothers with Early GDM should be treated. Because maternal age at delivery, pre-pregnancy BMI, hemoglobin A1c in the first trimester, 1h PG, 2h PG, initial increase, subsequent decrease, and number of abnormal values in the 75 g OGTT were significantly higher in Early GDM treated with insulin therapy that was initiated before 24 gestational weeks than in Diet Early GDM.
Some diet therapies for GDM have been reported. Dietary approaches to stop hypertension (DASH) are associated with decreased neonatal overgrowth and adverse perinatal outcomes [24]. The Mediterranean Diet reduced the development of GDM, hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, preeclampsia, preterm delivery, low birth weight (<2500 g), and fetal growth restriction [25]. Tsirou et al. reported that a very-low-calorie diet regimen (1600 kcal/day) and a low-calorie diet regimen (1800 kcal/day) achieved similar maternal, neonatal, and perinatal outcomes [26]. A systematic review and meta-analysis showed that diet therapy for GDM can improve maternal glycemic parameters and perinatal outcomes [27]. However, to date, no studies have confirmed the appropriate calorie intake for mothers with GDM. A Cochrane review reported that the evidence for diet therapy in GDM remains limited [28]. Recently, several randomized trials have been conducted. The aim of reducing hyperglycemia was the New Nordic Diet in women in the Gestational Onal Diabetes Mellitus (iNDIGO) study, a randomized parallel controlled trial in Sweden [29]. Manchester intermittent diet in GDM acceptability study (MIDDAS-GDM) is planned to investigate the safety, feasibility, and acceptability of an intermittent low-energy diet for patients with obesity [30]. In this study, maternal weight, not only during pregnancy but also before pregnancy, was associated with LGA in Diet Early GDM. According to preconception care, controlling maternal weight is also important for improving neonatal overgrowth in the Diet Early GDM.
This study had some limitations. First, it was a retrospective cohort study. Therefore, when mothers with early GDM do not receive treatment to control PG, we do not know how the perinatal outcomes are impacted. However, to the best of our knowledge, no data exist comparing perinatal outcomes between dietary early GDM and NGT. Additionally, since we evaluated the perinatal outcomes between the two groups using PSM, the bias could be minimized, and the results might be useful and important for managing early GDM in the diet. Second, because our hospital is a university hospital, many high-risk mothers may have been included in the NGT group. Third, in our hospital, nutritionists educated every patient with Early GDM on calorie intake. However, we could not obtain detailed information about the diet of mothers with early GDM. Furthermore, although we analyzed the comparison of maternal and perinatal outcomes between Diet Early GDM and NGT, mothers with NGT did not receive any nutritional advice, and we did not receive any data about calorie intake from them. However, in the previous report, the mean Japanese pregnant women’s calorie intake was <1600 kcal [31]. Therefore, the calorie intake of mothers with NGT might be lower in Japanese than that found in our data (Supplementary Figure S2). Mustafa et al. reported that low adherence in the diet recommendation group was associated with increased oral medication and insulin therapy compared to the high adherence group in mothers with GDM. Visiting a nutritionist is associated with decreased LGA infants [32]. Moreover, primiparity, no history of GDM, underweight, and smoking were significantly associated with lower dietary adherence in New Zealand [33]. Although most expectant women at our hospital are nulliparous and do not smoke, and adherence to diet therapy might be high, further research is required to investigate how mothers with Early GDM select and eat, using tools such as smartphone applications. Furthermore, although the American Diabetes Association recommends that metformin and glyburide should not be used as first-line agents and other oral medications to reduce maternal PG, long-term safety data are unavailable [2]. Oral medications are used to manage GDM in other countries. However, oral medications are not administered to pregnant women in Japan. Therefore, the association between oral medication and dietary therapy was not evaluated in this study.

5. Conclusions

Among patients with early GDM, those treated with diet therapy alone until delivery did not exhibit a worse prognosis than those treated with NGT. To prevent LGA, it may be important to control maternal body weight not only during pregnancy but also before conception.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/nu16111553/s1, Table S1: The nutrition facts of diet therapy for gestational diabetes mellitus at Keio University Hospital; Table S2: Characteristics and perinatal outcomes between large for gestational age and non-large for gestational age groups in gestational diabetes mellitus diagnosed before 24 gestational weeks treated with diet therapy; Table S3: Associations of maternal and perinatal factors with large for gestational age in Diet Early gestational diabetes; Figure S1: Diagnostic criteria for gestational diabetes mellitus.; Figure S2: The number of cases per calorie intake in gestational diabetes diagnosed before 24 gestational weeks who received diet therapy.

Author Contributions

Y.K. collected the data, performed statistical analyses, wrote the manuscript, contributed to the discussion, and reviewed and edited the manuscript. M.T. (Marina Takahashi) collected the data and performed statistical analyses. K.K., K.A., T.O. and S.I. contributed to the discussion and reviewed and edited the manuscript. M.T. (Mamoru Tanaka) supervised this study. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was financially supported by a grant from the Seiichi Imai Memorial Foundation.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The Keio University Hospital Ethics Committee allowed this study (Nos. 20150103, date 23 June 2015 and 20150168, date 31 July 2015).

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all participants involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author. The data are not publicly available due to privacy.

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank all medical staff who provided perinatal care at Keio University Hospital.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Caughey, A.B.; Turrentine, M. ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 190: Gestational diabetes mellitus. Obstet. Gynecol. 2018, 131, e49–e64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. ElSayed, N.A.; Aleppo, G.; Aroda, V.R.; Bannuru, R.R.; Brown, F.M.; Bruemmer, D.; Collins, B.S.; Hilliard, M.E.; Isaacs, D.; Johnson, E.L.; et al. 15. Management of diabetes in pregnancy: Standards of care in diabetes-2023. Diabetes Care 2023, 46, S254–S266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Kapur, K.; Kapur, A.; Hod, M. Nutrition management of gestational diabetes mellitus. Ann. Nutr. Metab. 2021, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Tsirou, E.; Grammatikopoulou, M.G.; Theodoridis, X.; Gkiouras, K.; Petalidou, A.; Taousani, E.; Savvaki, D.; Tsapas, A.; Goulis, D.G. Guidelines for medical nutrition therapy in gestational diabetes mellitus: Systematic review and critical appraisal. J. Acad. Nutr. Diet. 2019, 119, 1320–1339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Valgeirsdottir, I.R.; Hanson, U.; Schwarcz, E.; Simmons, D.; Backman, H. Diet-treated gestational diabetes mellitus is an underestimated risk factor for adverse pregnancy outcomes: A Swedish population-based cohort study. Nutrients 2022, 14, 3364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Simmons, D.; Immanuel, J.; Hague, W.M.; Teede, H.; Nolan, C.J.; Peek, M.J.; Flack, J.R.; McLean, M.; Wong, V.; Hibbert, E.; et al. Treatment of gestational diabetes mellitus diagnosed early in pregnancy. N. Engl. J. Med. 2023, 388, 2132–2144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Tamagawa, M.; Kasuga, Y.; Saisho, Y.; Tanaka, Y.; Hasegawa, K.; Oishi, M.; Endo, T.; Sato, Y.; Ikenoue, S.; Tanaka, M.; et al. Predictors of later insulin therapy for gestational diabetes diagnosed in early pregnancy. Endocr. J. 2021, 68, 1321–1328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Itakura, A.; Shoji, S.; Shigeru, A.; Kotaro, F.; Junichi, H.; Hironobu, H.; Kamei, Y.; Eiji, K.; Shintaro, M.; Ryu, M.; et al. Guidelines for obstetrical practice in Japan: Japan Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Japan Association of Obstetricians and Gynecologists 2020 edition. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. Res. 2023, 49, 5–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Sweeting, A.N.; Ross, G.P.; Hyett, J.; Molyneaux, L.; Constantino, M.; Harding, A.J.; Wong, J. Gestational diabetes mellitus in early pregnancy: Evidence for poor pregnancy outcomes despite treatment. Diabetes Care 2016, 39, 75–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Feghali, M.N.; Abebe, K.Z.; Comer, D.M.; Caritis, S.; Catov, J.M.; Scifres, C.M. Pregnancy outcomes in women with an early diagnosis of gestational diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Res. Clin. Pract. 2018, 138, 177–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Sugihara, S.; Sasaki, N.; Amemiya, S.; Kohno, H.; Tanaka, T.; Matsuura, N. Analysis of weight at birth and at diagnosis of childhood-onset type 2 diabetes mellitus in Japan. Pediatr. Diabetes 2008, 9, 285–290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Oishi, M.; Kasuga, Y.; Fukuma, Y.; Hamuro, A.; Tamai, J.; Tanaka, Y.; Hasegawa, K.; Yoshimura, T.; Ikenoue, S.; Ochiai, D.; et al. Obstetric outcomes after medroxyprogesterone acetate treatment for early stage endometrial cancer or atypical endometrial hyperplasia: A single hospital-based study. Int. J. Clin. Oncol. 2023, 28, 587–591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Tano, S.; Kotani, T.; Ushida, T.; Yoshihara, M.; Imai, K.; Nakamura, N.; Iitani, Y.; Moriyama, Y.; Emoto, R.; Kato, S.; et al. Evaluating glucose variability through OGTT in early pregnancy and its association with hypertensive disorders of pregnancy in non-diabetic pregnancies: A large-scale multi-center retrospective study. Diabetol. Metab. Syndr. 2023, 15, 123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Morisaki, N.; Nagata, C.; Jwa, S.C.; Sago, H.; Saito, S.; Oken, E.; Fujiwara, T. Pre-pregnancy BMI-specific optimal gestational weight gain for women in Japan. J. Epidemiol. 2017, 27, 492–498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Hagiwara, Y.; Kasai, J.; Nakanishi, S.; Saigusa, Y.; Miyagi, E.; Aoki, S. Should the IADPSG criteria be applied when diagnosing early-onset gestational diabetes? Diabetes Res. Clin. Pract. 2018, 140, 154–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Nakanishi, S.; Aoki, S.; Shindo, R.; Obata, S.; Kasai, J.; Miyagi, E. Do pregnancy outcomes of women with false-positive early gestational diabetes mellitus differ from those of women with normal glucose tolerance? BMC Endocr. Disord. 2022, 22, 203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Simmons, D.; Immanuel, J.; Hague, W.M.; Teede, H.; Nolan, C.J.; Peek, M.J.; Flack, J.R.; McLean, M.; Wong, V.W.; Hibbert, E.J.; et al. Regression from early GDM to normal glucose tolerance and adverse pregnancy outcomes in the treatment of booking gestational diabetes mellitus study. Diabetes Care 2024, dc232215, Online ahead of print. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  18. Yabe, D.; Seino, Y. Type 2 diabetes via beta-cell dysfunction in east Asian people. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2016, 4, 2–3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Saisho, Y.; Miyakoshi, K.; Tanaka, M.; Shimada, A.; Ikenoue, S.; Kadohira, I.; Yoshimura, Y.; Itoh, H. Beta cell dysfunction and its clinical significance in gestational diabetes. Endocr. J. 2010, 57, 973–980. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Kasuga, Y.; Hata, K.; Tajima, A.; Ochiai, D.; Saisho, Y.; Matsumoto, T.; Arata, N.; Miyakoshi, K.; Tanaka, M. Association of common polymorphisms with gestational diabetes mellitus in Japanese women: A case-control study. Endocr. J. 2017, 64, 463–475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Wang, Y.; Li, L.; Li, P. Novel single nucleotide polymorphisms in gestational diabetes mellitus. Clin. Chim. Acta 2023, 538, 60–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Ortega-Contreras, B.; Armella, A.; Appel, J.; Mennickent, D.; Araya, J.; Gonzalez, M.; Castro, E.; Obregon, A.M.; Lamperti, L.; Gutierrez, J.; et al. Pathophysiological role of genetic factors associated with gestational diabetes mellitus. Front. Physiol. 2022, 13, 769924. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Kasuga, Y.; Miyakoshi, K.; Saisho, Y.; Ikenoue, S.; Ochiai, D.; Tanaka, M. Impaired early phase insulin secretion associated with gestational diabetes mellitus in underweight women. J. Matern. Fetal Neonatal Med. 2022, 35, 2411–2413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Asemi, Z.; Samimi, M.; Tabassi, Z.; Esmaillzadeh, A. The effect of DASH diet on pregnancy outcomes in gestational diabetes: A randomized controlled clinical trial. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 2014, 68, 490–495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Xu, J.; Wang, H.; Bian, J.; Xu, M.; Jiang, N.; Luo, W.; Zu, P.; Yin, W.; Zhu, P. Association between the maternal Mediterranean diet and perinatal outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Adv. Nutr. 2024, 15, 100159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Tsirou, E.; Grammatikopoulou, M.G.; Nigdelis, M.P.; Taousani, E.; Savvaki, D.; Assimakopoulos, E.; Tsapas, A.; Goulis, D.G. TIMER: A clinical study of energy restriction in women with gestational diabetes mellitus. Nutrients 2021, 13, 2457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Lin, Q.; Zhang, Z.; Meng, Q.; Xie, Y.; Liu, Z.; Hu, C.; Wang, G.; Qin, P.; Bo, Q. Effects of different dietary patterns during pregnancy on birth outcomes and glucose parameters in women with gestational diabetes mellitus: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Prim. Care Diabetes 2023, 17, 287–308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Han, S.; Middleton, P.; Shepherd, E.; Van Ryswyk, E.; Crowther, C.A. Different types of dietary advice for women with gestational diabetes mellitus. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2017, 2, CD009275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Karlsson, T.; Augustin, H.; Lindqvist, M.; Otten, J.; Petersson, K.; Storck-Lindholm, E.; Mogren, I.; Winkvist, A. Effect of the New Nordic Diet compared with usual care on glucose control in gestational diabetes mellitus: Study protocol for the randomized controlled trial intervention with new Nordic DIet in women with GestatiOnal diabetes mellitus (iNDIGO). Contemp. Clin. Trials 2022, 115, 106706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Dapre, E.; Issa, B.G.; Harvie, M.; Su, T.L.; McMillan, B.; Pilkington, A.; Hanna, F.; Vyas, A.; Mackie, S.; Yates, J.; et al. Manchester Intermittent Diet in Gestational Diabetes Acceptability Study (MIDDAS-GDM): A two-arm randomised feasibility protocol trial of an intermittent low-energy diet (ILED) in women with gestational diabetes and obesity in Greater Manchester. BMJ Open 2024, 14, e078264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Kubota, K.; Itoh, H.; Tasaka, M.; Naito, H.; Fukuoka, Y.; Muramatsu Kato, K.; Kohmura, Y.K.; Sugihara, K.; Kanayama, N.; Hamamatsu Birth Cohort Study, T. Changes of maternal dietary intake, bodyweight and fetal growth throughout pregnancy in pregnant Japanese women. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. Res. 2013, 39, 1383–1390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Mustafa, S.T.; Harding, J.E.; Wall, C.R.; Crowther, C.A. Adherence to clinical practice guideline recommendations in women with gestational diabetes and associations with maternal and infant health-A cohort study. Nutrients 2022, 14, 1274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Mustafa, S.; Harding, J.; Wall, C.; Crowther, C. Sociodemographic factors associated with adherence to dietary guidelines in women with gestational diabetes: A cohort study. Nutrients 2021, 13, 1884. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Table 1. Characteristics and perinatal outcomes between diet therapy in early gestational diabetes group and normal glucose tolerance group.
Table 1. Characteristics and perinatal outcomes between diet therapy in early gestational diabetes group and normal glucose tolerance group.
Diet Early GDMNGTp-Value
(n = 309)(n = 309)
Maternal age at delivery(years)37(24–51)37(24–48)0.48
Nulliparity 180(58%) 173 (56%) 0.63
Pre-pregnancy BMI(kg/m2)21.2(16.0–36.3)21.5(15.5–35.9)0.51
Maternal pre-pregnancy BMI category 0.39
Underweight (BMI < 18.5) 38(12%) 37 (12%)
Normal weight (18.5 ≤ BMI < 25.0) 213(69%) 223 (72%)
Overweight (25.0 ≤ BMI < 30.0) 51(17%) 39 (13%)
Obese (30 ≤ BMI) 7(2%) 10 (3%)
Gestational weight gain expected 40 weeks(kg)8.7 (−8.6, 21.3)9.8(−13.7, 24)0.0086
Gestational weeks at delivery(weeks)38(23–41)38(22–41)0.36
Preterm delivery 39(13%) 57 (18%) 0.059
Cesarean section delivery 149(48%) 164 (53%) 0.26
Birthweight(g)2906(438–4526)2930(257–4276)0.79
Hypertensive disorder of pregnancy 11(4%) 21(7%) 0.10
Macrosomia (birthweight ≥ 4000 g) 1(0%) 4(1%) 0.37
Low birthweight (birthweight < 2500 g) 38(12%) 68 (22%) 0.0019
Large for gestational age (birthweight ≥ 90 percentile) 35(11%) 43 (14%) 0.40
Small for gestational age (birthweight < 10 percentile) 20(6%) 28 (9%) 0.29
Apgar score 1 min 8(1–10)8(0–10)0.17
<6 9(%)36(%)<0.001
<8 47(%)81(%)0.001
Apgar score 5 min 9(2–10)9(0–10)0.0006
<6 2(%)13(%)0.0034
<8 8(%)36(%)<0.001
BMI, body mass index; GDM, gestational diabetes; NGT, normal glucose tolerance.
Table 2. Characteristics and perinatal outcomes between large and non-large for gestational age groups in this study.
Table 2. Characteristics and perinatal outcomes between large and non-large for gestational age groups in this study.
LGANon-LGAp-Value
(n = 78)(n = 540)
Maternal age at delivery(years)37(28–45)36.5(24–51)0.39
Nulliparity 48(62%)305(56%)0.46
Pre-pregnancy BMI(kg/m2)21.7(17.5–32.4)21.3(15.5–36.3)0.37
Maternal pre-pregnancy BMI category 0.55
Underweight (BMI < 18.5) 9(12%)66(12%)
Normal weight (18.5 ≤ BMI < 25.0) 51(65%)385(71%)
Overweight (25.0 ≤ BMI < 30.0) 15(19%)75(14%)
Obese (30 ≤ BMI) 3(4%)14(3%)
Diet Early GDM 35(45%)274(51%)0.40
Random plasma glucose level during the first trimester(mg/dL)98(82–143)99(60–169)0.55
Gestational weight gain expected 40 weeks(kg)11.4(1.8–24.0)9(−13.7–23.8)0.0009
Gestational weeks at delivery(weeks)39(24–40)38(22–41)0.0014
Preterm delivery 8(10%)88(16%)0.19
Cesarean section delivery 31(40%)282(52%)0.04
Birthweight(g)3613(897–4526)2866(257–3722)<0.0001
Apgar score 1 min 8(1–9)8(0–10)0.78
Apgar score 5 min 9(2–10)9(0–10)0.84
LGA: large for gestational age; BMI, body mass index; GDM, gestational diabetes.
Table 3. Associations of maternal and perinatal factors with large for gestational age.
Table 3. Associations of maternal and perinatal factors with large for gestational age.
VariableUnadjusted OR (95%CI)p-ValueAdjusted OR (95%CI)p-Value
Gestational weight gain expected 40 weeks (+1 kg)1.08(1.03–1.14)0.00191.09(1.03–1.14)0.0016
Gestational weeks at delivery (+1 week)1.14(1.02–1.30)0.0161.14(1.02–1.30)0.014
CI: confidence interval.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Kasuga, Y.; Takahashi, M.; Kajikawa, K.; Akita, K.; Otani, T.; Ikenoue, S.; Tanaka, M. Perinatal Outcomes of Diet Therapy in Gestational Diabetes Mellitus Diagnosed before 24 Gestational Weeks. Nutrients 2024, 16, 1553. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu16111553

AMA Style

Kasuga Y, Takahashi M, Kajikawa K, Akita K, Otani T, Ikenoue S, Tanaka M. Perinatal Outcomes of Diet Therapy in Gestational Diabetes Mellitus Diagnosed before 24 Gestational Weeks. Nutrients. 2024; 16(11):1553. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu16111553

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kasuga, Yoshifumi, Marina Takahashi, Kaoru Kajikawa, Keisuke Akita, Toshimitsu Otani, Satoru Ikenoue, and Mamoru Tanaka. 2024. "Perinatal Outcomes of Diet Therapy in Gestational Diabetes Mellitus Diagnosed before 24 Gestational Weeks" Nutrients 16, no. 11: 1553. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu16111553

APA Style

Kasuga, Y., Takahashi, M., Kajikawa, K., Akita, K., Otani, T., Ikenoue, S., & Tanaka, M. (2024). Perinatal Outcomes of Diet Therapy in Gestational Diabetes Mellitus Diagnosed before 24 Gestational Weeks. Nutrients, 16(11), 1553. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu16111553

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop