Next Article in Journal
Comparison between Acupuncture and Nutraceutical Treatment with Migratens® in Patients with Fibromyalgia Syndrome: A Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial
Next Article in Special Issue
The Firmicutes/Bacteroidetes Ratio: A Relevant Marker of Gut Dysbiosis in Obese Patients?
Previous Article in Journal
Obesogenic Lifestyle and Its Influence on Adiposity in Children and Adolescents, Evidence from Mexico
Previous Article in Special Issue
Combined Soluble Fiber-Mediated Intestinal Microbiota Improve Insulin Sensitivity of Obese Mice
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Nutrients
Volume 12
Issue 3
10.3390/nu12030820
nutrients-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Gut Microbiota Dysbiosis in Patients with Biopsy-Proven Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease: A Cross-Sectional Study in Taiwan

by
Ming-Chao Tsai
1,2,*,
Yu-Yin Liu
3,
Chih-Che Lin
4,
Chih-Chi Wang
4,
Yi-Ju Wu
4,
Chee-Chien Yong
4,
Kuang-Den Chen
5,
Seng-Kee Chuah
1,
Chih-Chien Yao
1,
Pao-Yuan Huang
1,
Chien-Hung Chen
1,
Tsung-Hui Hu
1 and
Chao-Long Chen
4
1
Division of Hepato-Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Kaohsiung, 123 Ta Pei Road, Niao Sung Dist., Kaohsiung City 83301, Taiwan
2
Graduate Institute of Clinical Medical Sciences, Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Kaohsiung 83301, Taiwan
3
Department of General Surgery, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Kaohsiung 83301, Taiwan
4
Liver Transplantation Center and Department of Surgery, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Kaohsiung 83301, Taiwan
5
Center for Translational Research in Biomedical Sciences, Liver Transplantation Program and Department of Surgery, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Kaohsiung 83301, Taiwan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Nutrients 2020, 12(3), 820; https://doi.org/10.3390/nu12030820
Submission received: 15 February 2020 / Revised: 13 March 2020 / Accepted: 17 March 2020 / Published: 19 March 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue The Link between Diet, Gut Microbes and Health)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
The gut microbiota plays a role in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), but data about gut dysbiosis in Asians with NAFLD remains scarce. We analyzed the differences in fecal microbiota between adults with and without NAFLD. This cross-sectional study examined adults with histology-proven NAFLD (25 nonalcoholic fatty liver (NAFL) patients, 25 nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) patients, and 25 living liver donors (healthy controls)). The taxonomic composition of the gut microbiota was determined by 16S ribosomal RNA gene sequencing of stool samples. The NAFL and NASH groups showed lower total bacterial diversity and richness than the controls. NAFLD patients had higher levels of the phylum Bacteroidetes and lower levels of Firmicutes than controls. The genus Ruminococcaceae UCG-010, family Ruminococcaceae, order Clostridiales, and class Clostridia were less abundant in patients with NAFL or NASH than healthy individuals. The lipopolysaccharide biosynthesis pathway was differentially enriched in the NASH group. This study examined the largest number of Asian patients with biopsy-proven NAFL and NASH in terms of dysbiosis of the gut microbiota in NAFLD patients. NAFLD patients had higher levels of Bacteroidetes and lower levels of Firmicutes. These results are different from research from western countries and could provide different targets for therapies by region.

1. Introduction

Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is defined by the presence of at least 5% hepatic steatosis with a lack of common causes of secondary hepatic fat accumulation, such as excessive alcohol consumption, chronic viral hepatitis, autoimmune hepatitis, or long-term use of steatosis-inducing medications. NAFLD is the most common form of chronic liver disease in many industrialized counties, and globally, almost one-quarter of adults show excessive hepatic fat accumulation [1,2]. The condition constitutes a spectrum ranging from hepatic steatosis (nonalcoholic fatty liver (NAFL)) to steatosis with hepatocellular injury and possibly fibrosis (non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH)). NASH is the aggressive form of NAFLD. It leads to liver fibrosis and finally cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma, which increase liver-related morbidity and mortality [3]. NAFLD is strongly associated with obesity, diabetes, and insulin resistance, along with other features of metabolic syndrome. For many decades, NAFLD was thought to be predominantly driven by obesity in the context of genetic susceptibility. However, this association with obesity does not explain the variable severity of the illness and its outcomes [4]. The pathogenesis of NAFLD is not entirely understood. It is thought to involve complex interactions, including genetic factors, multiple dietary factors, and environmental factors, and more recently, microbial attacks on the liver have been recognized [5,6].
Recently, the gut microbiota has gained great attention in metabolic disease since gut dysbiosis has been demonstrated in obesity [7,8], diabetes [9], metabolic syndrome [10,11], and cardiovascular disease [12]. Dysbiosis is defined as any change in the composition of the microbiota other than that commonly found in healthy conditions. The human gut is home to around 100 trillion commensal organisms that carry 150 times more genes than the host and are collectively referred to as the microbiome [9]. Animal experiments in which the microbiome has been manipulated have shown that the gut microbiota plays an important role in the pathogenesis of NAFLD [13,14]. Nevertheless, only a few studies have linked gut dysbiosis with the severity of NAFLD in humans [15,16,17,18]. These studies had small sample sizes, heterogeneous populations, and divergent tools for gut microbiota analysis. Furthermore, not all patients underwent a liver biopsy, which may have resulted in the under-diagnosis of NASH. All of these studies had limited assessments of the association between gut dysbiosis and NAFLD.
Recently, Boursier et al. reported on the severity of NAFLD in association with gut dysbiosis in a correctly diagnosed population of biopsy-proven NAFLD patients [19]. NASH was independently and positively associated with higher levels of the genus Bacteroides in the fecal microbiome. However, all included patients were from a western country (Angers, France). The large-scale Human Microbiome Project (HMP) [20] reported that race was strongly correlated with specific microbial species and indicated that there are differences in microbiota composition between eastern and western countries. To date, there has been a marked paucity of studies on the role of gut microbiota in biopsy-proven NAFLD patients, especially in Asians. The aim of our study was to evaluate the changes in fecal microbiota in a population of biopsy-proven NAFL and NASH patients along with healthy controls from Taiwan.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Patients and Control Subjects

This study was approved by the Institutional Review Broad of Chang Gung Memorial Hospital (No.201701911B0) and was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and current ethical guidelines. A total of 50 biopsy-proven NAFLD patients (25 with NAFL and 25 with NASH) and 25 biopsy-proven healthy subjects (non-NAFLD) were recruited. After providing adequate explanation, written informed consent for participation in this study was obtained from all the subjects prior to the sample collection. The participants were asked to provide a stool sample on the morning of their liver biopsy, while a blood sample was checked to determine metabolic and hepatic parameters. Healthy subjects who were assessed for liver donation at Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital were screened as controls.
The inclusion criteria were subjects aged 18–70 years old with histology-proven NAFLD or healthy liver. One of the exclusion criteria was a history of another hepatic disease, such as chronic hepatitis B, hepatitis C, autoimmune hepatitis, primary biliary cirrhosis, sclerosing cholangitis, hemochromatosis, or Wilson’s disease, or excessive alcohol consumption (>140 g/week in men or >70 g/week in women). The other exclusion criteria were liver decompensation or malignancy, a history of chronic inflammatory bowel disease or bariatric surgery, and treatment with antibiotics or proton pump inhibitors within three months before inclusion.

2.2. Liver Histology

All biopsies were evaluated by two experienced hepatopathologists who were blinded to the clinical characteristics. NASH was diagnosed according to Brunt et al. [21] and required the presence of steatosis, ballooning, and lobular inflammation. The NAFLD activity score (NAS) was assessed for each biopsy specimen according to the guidelines established by Kleiner et al. [22] Steatosis was graded with 0–3 points as follows: (0) steatosis <5%; (1) 5–33%; (2) steatosis 33–66%; and (3) steatosis >66%. Lobular inflammation was scored as follows according to the number of foci of inflammatory infiltration per 200× microscopic field: (0) no inflammation; (1) <2 foci; (2) 2–4 foci; and (3) >4 foci. Ballooning degeneration was scored between 0 and 2 points as follows: (0) none; (1) few balloon cells; and (2) many balloon cells. NAS was defined as the sum of the scores ranging from 0 to 8 and is proposed to be a measure of overall activity of the disease.

2.3. Stool Sample Preparation and 16S rRNA Gene Amplification and Sequencing

Fresh stool samples were collected at home from study population using separate sterile feces containers containing stabilizer (DNA/RNA ShieldTM, ZYMO RESEARCH CORP, Irvine, CA, USA). Samples with liquid stabilizer were shaken vigorously immediately after collection and stored in ambient temperature. The samples were transferred to the laboratory of Biotools Co., Ltd. (Taipei, Taiwan) within one week and then all samples were stored at −80 °C. Total genomic DNA from samples was extracted using the column-based method (e.g., QIAamp PowerFecal DNA Kit, Qiagen, Austin, TX, USA). DNA concentration was determined and adjusted to 5 ng/µL for the following process. For the 16S rRNA gene sequencing, V3–-V4 region was amplified by specific primer set (319F: 5′-CCTACGGGNGGCWGCAG-3′, 806R: 5′- GACTACHVGGGTAT CTAATCC-3′) according to the 16S Metagenomic Sequencing Library Preparation procedure (Illumina). In brief, 12.5 ng of gDNA was used for the PCR reaction carried out with KAPA HiFi HotStart ReadyMix (Roche, Cape Town, South Africa) under the PCR condition: 95 °C for 3 min; 25 cycles of: 95 °C for 30 s, 55 °C for 30 s, and 72 °C for 30 s; 72 °C for 5 min and hold at 4 °C. The PCR products were monitored on 1.5% agarose gel. Samples with bright main strip around 500 bp were chosen and purified by using the AMPure XP (Beckman, Indianapolis, IN, USA) beads for the following library preparation. The Sequencing library was prepared according to the 16S Metagenomic Sequencing Library Preparation procedure (Illumina). In brief, a secondary PCR was performed by using the 16S rRNA V3–V4 region PCR amplicon and Nextera XT Index Kit (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA) with dual indices and Illumina sequencing adapters (Illumina). The indexed PCR product quality was assessed on the Qubit 4.0 Fluorometer (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) and Qsep100TM system (BIOptic, Taipei, Taiwan). Equal amounts of the indexed PCR product were mixed to generate the sequencing library. Finally, the library was sequenced on an Illumina MiSeq platform (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA) and paired 300-bp reads were generated.

2.4. Processing and Analysis of Gut Microbiota

Quality filtering of the raw tags was performed under specific filtering conditions according to Quantitative Insights Into Microbial Ecology (QIIME) version 2 [23]. Sequences with 97% resemblance or greater were categorized as having the same operational taxonomic units (OTUs) using the USEARCH algorithm. The relative abundance of each taxon was determined by dividing the assigned read counts by the total read counts. The alpha (Chao 1 and ACE) and beta (PLS-DA) diversity of the gut microbiota was calculated using the relative abundance of OTUs in each sample and QIIME (Version 2). A heat map of the identified key variables was completed using Heat Map Builder (pheatap, https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=pheatmap).
The linear discriminant analysis (LDA) effect size (LEfSe) method was used to determine biomarkers to identify the differential enrichment of abundant taxa between groups. The algorithm performs a nonparametric factorial Kruskal–Wallis sum-rank test and LDA to determine statistically significant different features among taxa and estimates the effect size of the difference [24]. Differences were considered significant with adjusted p values <0.05, and logarithmic LDA scores greater than 4 were displayed in the final output.
The functional composition of metagenomes was predicted from 16S rRNA data by Phylogenetic Reconstruction of Unobserved States (PICRUSt) software, as described previously [25]. The Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) ortholog abundances were used to design the map of metabolic pathways (KEGG database, http://www.genome.jp/kegg/).

2.5. Statistical Analysis

Baseline characteristics and clinical variables were summarized as the mean ± standard deviation, the median (25th–75th percentile), or a percentage. Original observation data in taxa summary plots were normalized by computing the relative abundance. The chi-squared test, an independent two-sample t-test, and Kruskal–Wallis test were used as appropriate to assess the significance of any differences in distributions. Statistical significance was accepted with a two-sided p value of <0.05. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS version 18.0 for Windows (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA).

3. Results

3.1. Clinical Characteristics of Healthy Individuals and Patients with NAFLD

A total of 75 subjects were enrolled in this study, including 25 health controls (non-NAFLD group), as well as 25 NAFL patients and 25 NASH patients (NAFLD group). The characteristics and clinical data are shown in Table 1. The patients with NAFLD (NAFL or NASH) were older than the healthy controls. There was no significant difference in the gender among groups.
As expected, NAFLD patients had significantly higher metabolic parameters than the healthy controls, including body mass index (BMI), fasting glucose, glycohemoglobin, total cholesterol, total triglycerides, and homeostatic model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR). In the histology analysis, NAFLD patients had significantly higher rates of steatosis, fibrosis stages, and NAS. Among patients with NAFLD, NASH patients had significantly higher triglyceride levels, fasting glucose levels, HbA1C levels, and HOMA-IR than those with NAFL. As expected, NASH patients had higher rates of steatosis and NAS and higher fibrosis stages than those with NAFL.

3.2. Gut Microbiota in NAFL/NASH and Healthy Controls

We characterized the fecal microbiomes of a total of 75 samples. After applying strict trimming criteria to exclude low-quality reads, a total of 5,083,499 high-quality sequences were obtained with an average of 67,780 reads per sample (range: 33,723–139,557 reads per sample). The rarefaction curve analysis suggested that the microbiome diversity was captured beyond 30,000 reads across the whole sample as the number of observed species plateaued (Figure S1A).
The overlapping OTUs of the three groups is shown in a Venn diagram in Figure S1B. The data demonstrate that the healthy controls, NAFL patients, and NASH patients independently had 130, 40, and 33 OTUs, respectively. According to the rank-abundance curves, the species richness of the healthy controls was higher than that of the NAFL and NASH groups (Figure 1A). The indices of alpha-diversity, including Chao1 and ACE, were not significantly different among the three groups. We also evaluated the compositions of the gut microbiota among the three groups using the score plots of the partial least squares discriminant analysis (PLS-DA) method (Figure 1B). The plots showed that there was a significant separation between each group with 8.58% and 2.76% explanation of the variation of the gut microbiota composition in PLS1 and PLS2, respectively. Figure 1C shows a heat map of the top 35 genera, which reveals the very diverse patterns among the three groups. To summarize, the findings indicate distinct microbes among the three groups. Briefly, there is dysbiosis in the composition of the gut microbiota among NAFL patients, NASH patients, and healthy individuals.

3.3. Bacterial Abundance and Distribution of the Predominant Bacteria at Different Taxonomic Levels

In the gut microbiomes examined, 16 bacteria phyla, 24 classes, 41 orders, 70 families, and 228 genera were identified. Figure 2 shows the bacterial distribution, which is characterized by the relative abundances of the top 10 of each taxon. At the phylum level (Figure 2A and Table S1), the main phyla were Bacteroidetes and Firmicutes, together accounting for nearly 90% of the total sequences. Of these, the abundance of Lentisphaerae was significantly lower in the NAFL and NASH groups than in the healthy group (p < 0.01). The ratio of Firmicutes to Bacteroidetes had been reported as a biomarker for obesity, but there was no significant difference between each group (Figure S2).
At the class level (Figure 2B and Table S2), the most prevalent classes were Bacteroidia, Clostridia, Negativicutes, and Gammaproteobacteria. Of these, Clostridia was significantly less abundant in the NAFL (p < 0.05) and NASH groups (p < 0.01) than the healthy controls. At the order level (Figure 2C and Table S3), the most prevalent were Bacteroidales, Clostridiales, Selenomonadales, Betaproteobacteriales, and Enterobacteriales. Of these, Cloastridiales was significantly less abundant in the NAFL (p < 0.05) and NASH groups (p < 0.01) than the healthy group. At the family level (Figure 2D and Table S4), the most prevalent families were Bacteroidaceae, Prevotellaceae, Ruminococcaceae, Lachnospiraceae, Veillonellaceae, Acidaminococcaceae, Burkholderiaceae, and Enterobacteriaceae. Ruminococcaceae was significantly less abundant in the NAFL and NASH groups (p < 0.05) than the healthy group. At the genus level (Figure 2E and Table S5), the most abundant genera were Bacteroides, Prevotella, and Faecalibacterium. Ruminococcaceae UCG-010 was significantly less abundant in the NAFL and NASH groups (p < 0.01) than the healthy controls. It should be noted that the genus Ruminococcaceae UCG-010 belongs to the family Ruminococcaceae, order Clostridiales, and class Clostridia, and all were less abundant in patients with NAFL or NASH than healthy controls.

3.4. Differential Microbiota Compositions among Healthy and NAFL/NASH Groups

LEfSe modeling with a logarithmic LDA score cutoff ≥4.0 was then performed to confirm both the statistical and taxonomic differences between the gut microbiota of patients with NAFL or NASH and that of healthy controls, as shown in Figure 3. The NASH patients had greater abundance of the genus Megamonas and species Bacteroides coprocoia DSM 17136, whereas greater abundance of the class Clostridia, order Clostridiales, and family Ruminococcaceae were found in healthy controls. These results are compatible with the previous abundance analysis at different levels (Figure 3).

3.5. Microbial Functional Dysbiosis in Metabolic Pathways in NAFLD

To further understand the metabolic functions of genera among NAFLD patients and healthy controls, we inferred the metagenomes from the 16S rRNA data using PICRUSt [26] using level 3 of the Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes database (KEGG) orthologs to gain insight into the functional and metabolic changes of the microbial communities between NAFLD patients and healthy controls. For the healthy and NASH groups (Figure 4), there are many significant metabolic pathways; notably, lipopolysaccharide (LPS) biosynthesis (p = 0.005) and fatty acid biosynthesis (p = 0.006) appeared to be over-represented in the microbiomes of NASH patients, which were mainly related to glycan biosynthesis and metabolism and lipid metabolism, respectively. Collectively, the present data suggest that the change of the bacterial composition can lead to significant changes in gene function, which might contribute to the development of NAFL or NASH by the metabolic pathways, although it remains unclear whether LPS is increased in NASH.

4. Discussion

NAFLD is a disease of increasing interest as its prevalence is on the rise, affecting a quarter of the global population. This makes it the most common chronic liver disease in developed countries [27]. Traditionally, NAFLD has been considered a problem in western countries, but it is now increasingly recognized in Asian populations. Recently, many studies have implicated the gut microbiota as a leading cause in the context of NAFLD and NASH [13]. Data from human studies have established a relationship between the gut microbiota and NAFLD, but there have been few studies on Asians, and they have yielded inconsistent results. In the present study, we have demonstrated the altered diversity and composition of the gut microbiota of patients with NAFL and NASH in comparison to healthy controls. To our knowledge, this is the largest study with biopsy-proven NAFLD patients and healthy controls in the field of gut microbiota.
We observed dysbiosis of the gut microbiota in NAFLD patients. There was no significant difference in the ecological diversities (alpha and beta) among the NAFL, NASH, and healthy control groups, but there was lower total bacterial diversity and richness in the NAFL and NASH groups than in healthy individuals. The results are similar to prior studies from Asia [16,28,29]. The gut microbiota is a complex ecosystem that comprises two predominant bacterial phyla: Bacteroidetes and Firmicutes, which account for approximately 90% of the whole microbiota [30]. At the phylum level, NAFLD patients had higher levels of Bacteroidetes and lower levels of Firmicutes than healthy individuals, although the difference was not significant. This result is similar to those of Wang [28] and Wong et al. [16], who both examined Asian populations. The possible mechanisms might be explained by the strong positive correlations between fecal Bacteroidetes and the content of deoxycholic acid, D-pinitol, choline, raffinose, and stachyose [31,32], which influence the pathogenesis of NASH. In addition, the fecal Bacteroidetes accumulation is associated with an accumulation of branched-chain fatty acids that are produced by amino acid fermentation, which promote insulin resistance and increase the risk of NASH [33]. Thus, fecal Bacteroides might be detrimental for NAFLD.
Interestingly, our results were significantly different from those of a prior study, which indicated that NASH patients had lower levels of Bacteroidetes than healthy individuals from western countries [15]. Dietary composition is known to influence the growth of the Bacteroides, and Yatsunenko et al. found that a high-fat diet affects the growth [34]. Western pattern diets are generally characterized as being rich in fat, animal proteins, and sugar, while agrarian-society diets are low in red meat and animal-based fats and are rich in whole grains, starch, and plant polysaccharides. This type of diet is traditionally followed by people living in eastern countries such as Taiwan. Hence, we supposed that this discrepancy might partly reflect the different dietary compositions between western and eastern countries.
In the present study, the ratio of Firmicutes to Bacteroidetes was not different among patients with NAFL or NASH and healthy controls. This result is similar to those of Mouzaki et al. [15], who found that the ratio in NASH patients was not higher than in simple steatosis patients and healthy controls after carefully addressing the potential confounding effects of diet and BMI. Interestingly, in the present study, the ratio was lower in patients with NAFL or NASH than in healthy controls. This is different from the study by Ley et al. [30], in which a reduced proportion of Bacteroidetes and increase in Firmicutes were indicated as main features of obesity-related intestinal dysbiosis in humans. However, this result is still different in the subgroup analysis stratified by BMI (Table S6), in which individuals with BMI ≥25 had significantly higher proportions of Bacteroidetes and less Firmicutes (that is, lower ratios of Firmicutes to Bacteroidetes). Thus, it is still controversial to use the ratio of Firmicutes to Bacteroidetes to evaluate obesity or NASH patients due to the inconsistent results.
One study indicates that the genus Ruminococcus is associated with NAFLD, especially in patients with advanced fibrosis [19]. However, we did not find this; instead, we found a lower abundance of the genus Ruminococcaceae UCG-010 in NAFL and NASH patients than in healthy controls. In the study by Bouraier et al., there was a positive correlation between Ruminococcus abundance and significant (F ≥ 2) liver fibrosis [19]. There were 27 patients with advanced fibrosis (F ≥ 2) in that study, but in our cohort, there were only six patients. The different results might be due to the differences in severity between cohorts. Notably, the genus Ruminococcaceae UCG-010 belongs to the family Ruminococcaceae, order Clostridiales, and class Clostridia, and all of these levels were statistically less abundant in patients with NAFL or NASH than in healthy individuals. Ruminococcaceae can produce high levels of short-chain fatty acids, which can reduce inflammation. Therefore, the lower abundance of Ruminococcaceae may contribute to pathologies associated with NAFL and NASH. To date, no study has examined the genus Ruminococcaceae UCG-010. Further research is needed to confirm whether Ruminococcaceae UCG-010 plays a critical role in the pathogenesis of NAFL and NASH.
We predicted that bacterial functions would be enriched in LPS biosynthesis and fatty acid biosynthesis in NASH patients using PICRUSt analysis. The intestinal microbiota is believed to be the primary source of the bacterial endotoxin LPS produced by gram-negative bacteria. Normally, these bacterial molecules cross the mucosa in only trace amounts, enter the portal blood, and are cleared in the liver. LPS and other endotoxins may influence intestinal permeability, leading to greater translocation of microbial products, such as LPS, into the portal circulation. This would stimulate nuclear factor κB (NF-κB), which recruits inflammatory cells by increasing levels of tumor necrosis factor (TNF) and IL-1β, thus leading to fibrosis in NAFLD [35].
In addition to LPS, fatty acid synthase catalyzes the last step in fatty acid biosynthesis. Thus, it is believed to be a major determinant of the maximal hepatic capacity to generate fatty acids by de novo lipogenesis. Dorn et al. indicated that fatty acid synthase may serve as a therapeutic target for the progression of NAFLD [36], suggesting that the pathway of fatty acid biosynthesis plays an important role in the pathogenesis of NAFLD.
Recently, emerging evidence suggests that oral antidiabetic drugs, such as metformin, acarbose, and sitagliptin monotherapy, may respectively alter the composition of gut microbiota and selectively increased the beneficial bacteria [37]. In the present study, there was a total of 12 subjects with diabetes mellitus (two in healthy controls; three in NAFL group; seven in NASH group). Among them, three cases had metformin monotherapy and the other nine cases had combination therapy with metformin, acarbose, and/or sitagliptin. The case number is too small to draw the effects of the antidiabetics on the gut microbiota composition. Thus, whether antidiabetic drugs monotherapy plays a detrimental or beneficial role in the NAFLD patients warrants further investigation.
It is worth noting that our population was well phenotyped by a diagnostic liver biopsy for liver lesions, including the NAFL, NASH, and healthy control groups. NAFLD is easily over- or under-diagnosed by usual clinical and serological parameters. Therefore, studies that have compared individuals with biopsy-proven NASH to a no-biopsy obese control group might have been biased by un-diagnosed NASH among the controls. Currently, there are few studies with biopsy-proven NAFL or NASH [15,16,17,18], and only one study was conducted with biopsy-proven healthy individuals [15]. Therefore, the present study has a homogeneous, well characterized and correctly diagnosed population by biopsy-proven NAFL patients, NASH patients, and healthy individuals in Asia that gives value to the results.
We explored the relationship between the gut microbiota and the NAFLD using a large cohort and detailed phenotyping of biopsy-proven NAFLD and healthy controls. Nevertheless, additional work is needed to address several limitations. First, the utilization of 16S rRNA gene sequencing rather than metagenomics sequencing is a disadvantage of the study that limits data interpretation in terms of species level and function analysis. Second, our findings could be influenced by confounders such as age, dietary intake, and medication. Although patients using antibiotics or proton pump inhibitors were excluded in our analysis, the confounding effect of medications was probably not sufficiently assessed. Third, all subjects were ethnic Taiwanese, and the findings cannot be directly extrapolated to other populations. However, host regional variation had a strong effect on gut microbiota composition [38]. Finally, this is a cross-sectional study, so it does not show a direct impact of microbiota on the progression of NAFL and NASH. It is relatively difficult to draw conclusions regarding causality with this design. In a future study, it is imperative to use germ-free animal models and additional biofunctional assays to reveal the cause–effect relationship between the significant targeted bacteria and NAFLD.

5. Conclusions

In summary, this study has examined the largest number of biopsy-proven NAFL and NASH patients from Asia and the dysbiosis of gut microbiota between NAFLD patients and healthy controls. The diversity pattern was different from those observed in western countries. In addition, we showed the significant depletion of the genus Ruminococcaceae UCG-010 in the NAFLD patients for the first time. Future studies are required to investigate the biofunction and mechanisms underlying the interaction between the gut microbiota and NAFLD.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/2072-6643/12/3/820/s1, Figure S1: The diversity in gut microbiota of healthy individuals and patients with NAFL or NASH. (A) Rarefaction curves of all 16S amplicon samples of all samples. (B) Venn diagram of operational taxonomic units (OTUs) in three groups, Figure S2: Box plots presenting the Firmicutes/Bacteroidetes ratio comparison among patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFL) or nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) and healthy controls. There was no significant difference among groups. Boxplots shows the median, minimum, and maximum of values, and the Kruskal-Wallis test was performed, Table S1: Relative abundance of bacteria at the phylum level among healthy individuals and patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFL) or nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), Table S2: Relative abundance of bacteria at the class level among healthy individuals and patients with NAFL or NASH., Table S3: Relative abundance of bacteria at the order level among healthy individuals and patients with NAFL or NASH., Table S4: Relative abundance of bacteria at the family level among healthy individuals and patients with NAFL or NASH, Table S5: Relative abundance of bacteria at the genus level among healthy individuals and patients with NAFL or NASH, Table S6: Relative abundance of bacteria at the phylum level stratified by body mass index (BMI).

Author Contributions

M.-C.T.: contributed to concept generation, data interpretation, drafting of the manuscript, critical revision of the manuscript and approval of the article; Y.-Y.L., C.-C.L., C.-C.W., Y.-J.W., C.-C.Y. (Chee-Chien Yong), K.-D.C., S.-K.C., C.-C.Y. (Chih-Chien Yao), P.-Y.H., C.-H.C., T.-H.H., and C.-L.C.: contributed to data interpretation, critical revision of the manuscript and approval of the article. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by grants from Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taiwan (CMRPG8H1111, CMRPG8J1571, and CMRPG8K0661).

Acknowledgments

We thank the Biostatistics Center of Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital for their statistics work.

Conflicts of Interest

There is no conflict of interest to disclose for all authors.

References

  1. Loomba, R.; Sanyal, A.J. The global NAFLD epidemic. Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2013, 10, 686–690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Leung, C.; Rivera, L.; Furness, J.B.; Angus, P.W. The role of the gut microbiota in NAFLD. Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2016, 13, 412–425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Angulo, P. Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. New Engl. J. Med. 2002, 346, 1221–1231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Leung, J.C.-F.; Loong, T.C.-W.; Wei, J.L.; Wong, G.L.-H.; Chan, A.W.-H.; Choi, P.C.-L.; Shu, S.S.-T.; Chim, A.M.-L.; Chan, H.L.-Y.; Wong, V.W.-S. Histological severity and clinical outcomes of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease in nonobese patients. Hepatology 2017, 65, 54–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Neuschwander-Tetri, B.A. Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. BMC Med. 2017, 15, 45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Arab, J.P.; Karpen, S.J.; Dawson, P.A.; Arrese, M.; Trauner, M. Bile acids and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: Molecular insights and therapeutic perspectives. Hepatology 2017, 65, 350–362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Turnbaugh, P.J.; Hamady, M.; Yatsunenko, T.; Cantarel, B.L.; Duncan, A.; Ley, R.E.; Sogin, M.L.; Jones, W.J.; Roe, B.A.; Affourtit, J.P.; et al. A core gut microbiome in obese and lean twins. Nature 2009, 457, 480–484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Turnbaugh, P.J.; Ley, R.E.; Mahowald, M.A.; Magrini, V.; Mardis, E.R.; Gordon, J.I. An obesity-associated gut microbiome with increased capacity for energy harvest. Nature 2006, 444, 1027–1031. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Qin, J.; Li, Y.; Cai, Z.; Li, S.; Zhu, J.; Zhang, F.; Liang, S.; Zhang, W.; Guan, Y.; Shen, D.; et al. A metagenome-wide association study of gut microbiota in type 2 diabetes. Nature 2012, 490, 55–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Vrieze, A.; Van Nood, E.; Holleman, F.; Salojarvi, J.; Kootte, R.S.; Bartelsman, J.F.; Dallinga-Thie, G.M.; Ackermans, M.T.; Serlie, M.J.; Oozeer, R.; et al. Transfer of intestinal microbiota from lean donors increases insulin sensitivity in individuals with metabolic syndrome. Gastroenterology 2012, 143, 913–916.e7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Murphy, E.F.; Cotter, P.D.; Hogan, A.; O’Sullivan, O.; Joyce, A.; Fouhy, F.; Clarke, S.F.; Marques, T.M.; O’Toole, P.W.; Stanton, C.; et al. Divergent metabolic outcomes arising from targeted manipulation of the gut microbiota in diet-induced obesity. Gut 2013, 62, 220–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Wang, Z.; Klipfell, E.; Bennett, B.J.; Koeth, R.; Levison, B.S.; Dugar, B.; Feldstein, A.E.; Britt, E.B.; Fu, X.; Chung, Y.M.; et al. Gut flora metabolism of phosphatidylcholine promotes cardiovascular disease. Nature 2011, 472, 57–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Schnabl, B.; Brenner, D.A. Interactions between the intestinal microbiome and liver diseases. Gastroenterology 2014, 146, 1513–1524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Boursier, J.; Diehl, A.M. Implication of gut microbiota in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. PLoS Pathog. 2015, 11, e1004559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Mouzaki, M.; Comelli, E.M.; Arendt, B.M.; Bonengel, J.; Fung, S.K.; Fischer, S.E.; McGilvray, I.D.; Allard, J.P. Intestinal microbiota in patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Hepatology 2013, 58, 120–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Wong, V.W.-S.; Tse, C.-H.; Lam, T.T.-Y.; Wong, G.L.-H.; Chim, A.M.-L.; Chu, W.C.-W.; Yeung, D.K.-W.; Law, P.T.-W.; Kwan, H.-S.; Yu, J.; et al. Molecular characterization of the fecal microbiota in patients with nonalcoholic steatohepatitis--a longitudinal study. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e62885. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Zhu, L.; Baker, S.S.; Gill, C.; Liu, W.; Alkhouri, R.; Baker, R.D.; Gill, S.R. Characterization of gut microbiomes in nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) patients: A connection between endogenous alcohol and NASH. Hepatology 2013, 57, 601–609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Schwimmer, J.B.; Johnson, J.S.; Angeles, J.E.; Behling, C.; Belt, P.H.; Borecki, I.; Bross, C.; Durelle, J.; Goyal, N.P.; Hamilton, G.; et al. Microbiome Signatures Associated With Steatohepatitis and Moderate to Severe Fibrosis in Children With Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease. Gastroenterology 2019, 157, 1109–1122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Boursier, J.; Mueller, O.; Barret, M.; Machado, M.; Fizanne, L.; Araujo-Perez, F.; Guy, C.D.; Seed, P.C.; Rawls, J.F.; David, L.A.; et al. The severity of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease is associated with gut dysbiosis and shift in the metabolic function of the gut microbiota. Hepatology 2016, 63, 764–775. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Human Microbiome Project Consortium. A framework for human microbiome research. Nature 2012, 486, 215–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Brunt, E.M.; Janney, C.G.; Di Bisceglie, A.M.; Neuschwander-Tetri, B.A.; Bacon, B.R. Nonalcoholic steatohepatitis: A proposal for grading and staging the histological lesions. Am. J. Gastroenterol. 1999, 94, 2467–2474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Kleiner, D.E.; Brunt, E.M.; Van Natta, M.; Behling, C.; Contos, M.J.; Cummings, O.W.; Ferrell, L.D.; Liu, Y.-C.; Torbenson, M.S.; Unalp-Arida, A.; et al. Design and validation of a histological scoring system for nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Hepatology 2005, 41, 1313–1321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Caporaso, J.G.; Kuczynski, J.; Stombaugh, J.; Bittinger, K.; Bushman, F.D.; Costello, E.K.; Fierer, N.; Pena, A.G.; Goodrich, J.K.; Gordon, J.I.; et al. QIIME allows analysis of high-throughput community sequencing data. Nat. Methods 2010, 7, 335–336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Segata, N.; Izard, J.; Waldron, L.; Gevers, D.; Miropolsky, L.; Garrett, W.S.; Huttenhower, C. Metagenomic biomarker discovery and explanation. Genome Biol 2011, 12, R60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Yang, S.-F.; Huang, H.-D.; Fan, W.-L.; Jong, Y.-J.; Chen, M.-K.; Huang, C.-N.; Chuang, C.-Y.; Kuo, Y.-L.; Chung, W.-H.; Su, S.-C. Compositional and functional variations of oral microbiota associated with the mutational changes in oral cancer. Oral. Oncol. 2018, 77, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Langille, M.G.; Zaneveld, J.; Caporaso, J.G.; McDonald, D.; Knights, D.; Reyes, J.A.; Clemente, J.C.; Burkepile, D.E.; Vega Thurber, R.L.; Knight, R.; et al. Predictive functional profiling of microbial communities using 16S rRNA marker gene sequences. Nat Biotechnol 2013, 31, 814–821. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Younossi, Z.M.; Koenig, A.B.; Abdelatif, D.; Fazel, Y.; Henry, L.; Wymer, M. Global epidemiology of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease-Meta-analytic assessment of prevalence, incidence, and outcomes. Hepatology 2016, 64, 73–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Wang, B.; Jiang, X.; Cao, M.; Ge, J.; Bao, Q.; Tang, L.; Chen, Y.; Li, L. Altered Fecal Microbiota Correlates with Liver Biochemistry in Nonobese Patients with Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 32002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Shen, F.; Zheng, R.D.; Sun, X.Q.; Ding, W.J.; Wang, X.Y.; Fan, J.G. Gut microbiota dysbiosis in patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. Hepatobiliary Pancreat. Dis. Int. 2017, 16, 375–381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Ley, R.E.; Turnbaugh, P.J.; Klein, S.; Gordon, J.I. Microbial ecology: Human gut microbes associated with obesity. Nature 2006, 444, 1022–1023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Aranha, M.M.; Cortez-Pinto, H.; Costa, A.; da Silva, I.B.; Camilo, M.E.; de Moura, M.C.; Rodrigues, C.M. Bile acid levels are increased in the liver of patients with steatohepatitis. Eur. J. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2008, 20, 519–525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Ferreira, D.M.; Afonso, M.B.; Rodrigues, P.M.; Simao, A.L.; Pereira, D.M.; Borralho, P.M.; Rodrigues, C.M.; Castro, R.E. c-Jun N-terminal kinase 1/c-Jun activation of the p53/microRNA 34a/sirtuin 1 pathway contributes to apoptosis induced by deoxycholic acid in rat liver. Mol. Cell Biol. 2014, 34, 1100–1120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  33. Newgard, C.B. Interplay between lipids and branched-chain amino acids in development of insulin resistance. Cell Metab. 2012, 15, 606–614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  34. Yatsunenko, T.; Rey, F.E.; Manary, M.J.; Trehan, I.; Dominguez-Bello, M.G.; Contreras, M.; Magris, M.; Hidalgo, G.; Baldassano, R.N.; Anokhin, A.P.; et al. Human gut microbiome viewed across age and geography. Nature 2012, 486, 222–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Compare, D.; Coccoli, P.; Rocco, A.; Nardone, O.M.; De Maria, S.; Carteni, M.; Nardone, G. Gut--liver axis: The impact of gut microbiota on non alcoholic fatty liver disease. Nutr. Metab. Cardiovasc. Dis. 2012, 22, 471–476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Dorn, C.; Riener, M.-O.; Kirovski, G.; Saugspier, M.; Steib, K.; Weiss, T.S.; Gabele, E.; Kristiansen, G.; Hartmann, A.; Hellerbrand, C. Expression of fatty acid synthase in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Int. J. Clin. Exp. Pathol. 2010, 3, 505–514. [Google Scholar]
  37. Zhang, M.; Feng, R.; Yang, M.; Qian, C.; Wang, Z.; Liu, W.; Ma, J. Effects of metformin, acarbose, and sitagliptin monotherapy on gut microbiota in Zucker diabetic fatty rats. BMJ Open Diabetes Res. Care 2019, 7, e000717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. He, Y.; Wu, W.; Zheng, H.-M.; Li, P.; McDonald, D.; Sheng, H.-F.; Chen, M.-X.; Chen, Z.-H.; Ji, G.-Y.; Zheng, Z.-D.-X.; et al. Regional variation limits applications of healthy gut microbiome reference ranges and disease models. Nat. Med. 2018, 24, 1532–1535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Nutrients 12 00820 g001a 550Nutrients 12 00820 g001b 550
Figure 1. The diversity in gut microbiota of healthy individuals and patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFL) or nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH). (A) Observed species numbers in the three groups. (B) β-diversity changes in gut microbiota across groups by the partial least squares discriminant analysis (PLS-DA), which presented changes between samples collected from the control (non-NAFLD), NAFL, and NASH groups. Each node represents each sample. Control (non-NAFLD), NAFL, and NASH subjects are colored in blue, orange, and green, respectively. (C) Heat map of the top 35 genera among groups.
Figure 1. The diversity in gut microbiota of healthy individuals and patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFL) or nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH). (A) Observed species numbers in the three groups. (B) β-diversity changes in gut microbiota across groups by the partial least squares discriminant analysis (PLS-DA), which presented changes between samples collected from the control (non-NAFLD), NAFL, and NASH groups. Each node represents each sample. Control (non-NAFLD), NAFL, and NASH subjects are colored in blue, orange, and green, respectively. (C) Heat map of the top 35 genera among groups.
Nutrients 12 00820 g001aNutrients 12 00820 g001b
Nutrients 12 00820 g002a 550Nutrients 12 00820 g002b 550Nutrients 12 00820 g002c 550
Figure 2. Relative abundance of the top 10 microbiota and significantly scarce bacteria in the NAFL, and NASH groups compared with the healthy controls at the phylum (A), class (B), order (C), family (D), and genus (E) levels. Boxplots shows the median, the 25th, and the 75th percentile of relative abundances of bacteria. *p < 0.05 and ** p < 0.01 vs. healthy controls, Kruskal–Wallis test.
Figure 2. Relative abundance of the top 10 microbiota and significantly scarce bacteria in the NAFL, and NASH groups compared with the healthy controls at the phylum (A), class (B), order (C), family (D), and genus (E) levels. Boxplots shows the median, the 25th, and the 75th percentile of relative abundances of bacteria. *p < 0.05 and ** p < 0.01 vs. healthy controls, Kruskal–Wallis test.
Nutrients 12 00820 g002aNutrients 12 00820 g002bNutrients 12 00820 g002c
Nutrients 12 00820 g003 550
Figure 3. Linear discriminant analysis effect size (LEfSe) comparison of gut microbiota among healthy, NAFL, and NASH groups. The cladogram displays the taxonomic tree of differentially abundant taxa. The histogram represents the linear discriminant analysis (LDA) scores of bacteria with significant differential abundance between the compared groups identified by different colors.
Figure 3. Linear discriminant analysis effect size (LEfSe) comparison of gut microbiota among healthy, NAFL, and NASH groups. The cladogram displays the taxonomic tree of differentially abundant taxa. The histogram represents the linear discriminant analysis (LDA) scores of bacteria with significant differential abundance between the compared groups identified by different colors.
Nutrients 12 00820 g003
Nutrients 12 00820 g004 550
Figure 4. Difference in relative abundance of predicted microbial genes related to metabolism information between NASH and healthy controls. Data were processing by 16S rRNA sequencing data with PICRUSt using level 3 of Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) orthologs using Student’s t-test.
Figure 4. Difference in relative abundance of predicted microbial genes related to metabolism information between NASH and healthy controls. Data were processing by 16S rRNA sequencing data with PICRUSt using level 3 of Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) orthologs using Student’s t-test.
Nutrients 12 00820 g004
Table
Table 1. Characteristics of the study population.
Table 1. Characteristics of the study population.
Healthy Controls
(Group 1)
(n = 25)		NAFLD
(Group 2 and 3)
(n = 50)		p ValueNAFL
(Group 2)
(n = 25)		NASH
(Group 3)
(n = 25)		p Value
Males, n (%)12 (48)24 (48)1.00013 (52)11 (44)0.571
Age (years)36.7 ± 15.051.2 ± 15.0<0.00145.8 ± 16.256.6 ± 11.60.006
BMI (kg/m2)24.8 ± 5.231.3 ± 8.9<0.00131.2 ± 8.931.4 ± 9.00.764
Diabetes mellitus, n (%)2 (8)10 (20)0.1843 (12)7 (28)0.162
Hypertension, n (%)1 (4)20 (40)0.0018 (32)12 (48)0.253
AST (U/L)24.4 ± 14.136.0 ± 24.00.1129.0 ± 20.043.0 ± 26.00.013
ALT (U/L)22.5 ± 15.750.2 ± 43.1<0.00136.4 ± 31.464.0 ± 49.00.005
Total bilirubin (mg/dL)0.6 ± 0.30.8 ± 0.40.070.7 ± 0.40.8 ± 0.40.194
Albumin (g/dL)4.2 ± 0.44.6 ± 0.3<0.0014.5 ± 0.34.6 ± 0.20.322
Creatinine (mg/dL)0.7 ± 0.20.9 ± 0.80.1231.0 ± 1.10.8 ± 0.20.445
Total cholesterol (mg/dL)176.2 ± 30.1199.3 ± 40.00.009207.5 ± 44.0191.8 ± 35.20.227
Triglycerides (mg/dL)97.6 ± 55.0148.2 ± 61.5<0.001131.4 ± 67.5163.6 ± 52.10.021
Fasting glucose (mg/dL)94.8 ± 15.5112.0 ± 28.60.001105.6 ± 35.6118.0 ± 24.80.008
Glycohemoglobin (%)5.6 ± 0.56.5 ± 1.4<0.0016.1 ± 1.46.9 ± 1.20.005
Insulin (uU/mL)9.9 ± 9.217.3 ± 23.50.00210.7 ± 5.223.2 ± 31.20.001
Insulin/GLU0.08 ± 0.040.16 ± 0.240.0120.1 ± 0.040.2 ± 0.30.004
HOMA-IR2.0 ± 1.24.8 ± 6.10.0022.7 ± 1.66.6 ± 8.00.002
Steatosis (%)0 (0–1)30 (10–46.25)<0.00110 (7.5–30)40 (27.5–55)<0.001
Fibrosis (F0/F1/F2/F3)25/0/0/028/16/5/1<0.00123/2/0/05/14/5/1<0.001
NAS03 (0–4)<0.0010 (0–2)4 (4–5)<0.001
Data are expressed as mean ± standard deviation, median (interquartile range), or number (percentage). Abbreviations: ALT, alanine aminotransferase; AST, alanine aminotransferase; BMI, body mass index; HOMA-IR, homeostatic model assessment of insulin resistance; NAFLD, nonalcoholic fatty liver disease; NAFL, nonalcoholic fatty liver; NASH, nonalcoholic steatohepatitis; NAS, NAFLD activity score.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Tsai, M.-C.; Liu, Y.-Y.; Lin, C.-C.; Wang, C.-C.; Wu, Y.-J.; Yong, C.-C.; Chen, K.-D.; Chuah, S.-K.; Yao, C.-C.; Huang, P.-Y.; et al. Gut Microbiota Dysbiosis in Patients with Biopsy-Proven Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease: A Cross-Sectional Study in Taiwan. Nutrients 2020, 12, 820. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu12030820

AMA Style

Tsai M-C, Liu Y-Y, Lin C-C, Wang C-C, Wu Y-J, Yong C-C, Chen K-D, Chuah S-K, Yao C-C, Huang P-Y, et al. Gut Microbiota Dysbiosis in Patients with Biopsy-Proven Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease: A Cross-Sectional Study in Taiwan. Nutrients. 2020; 12(3):820. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu12030820

Chicago/Turabian Style

Tsai, Ming-Chao, Yu-Yin Liu, Chih-Che Lin, Chih-Chi Wang, Yi-Ju Wu, Chee-Chien Yong, Kuang-Den Chen, Seng-Kee Chuah, Chih-Chien Yao, Pao-Yuan Huang, and et al. 2020. "Gut Microbiota Dysbiosis in Patients with Biopsy-Proven Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease: A Cross-Sectional Study in Taiwan" Nutrients 12, no. 3: 820. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu12030820

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop