Next Article in Journal
Simultaneous Retrieval of Corn Growth Status and Soil Water Content Based on One GNSS Antenna
Next Article in Special Issue
The Movement of GPS Positioning Discrepancy Clouds at a Mid-Latitude Region in March 2015
Previous Article in Journal
A High-Resolution Land Surface Temperature Downscaling Method Based on Geographically Weighted Neural Network Regression
Previous Article in Special Issue
A Statistical Study of Ion Upflow during Periods of Dawnside Auroral Polarization Streams and Subauroral Polarization Streams
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Comparative Analysis of Global and Regional Ionospheric Responses during Two Geomagnetic Storms on 3 and 4 February 2022

National Institute of Geophysics, Geodesy and Geography—Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, Acad. G. Bonchev Str., bl. 3, 1113 Sofia, Bulgaria
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Remote Sens. 2023, 15(7), 1739; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs15071739
Submission received: 7 February 2023 / Revised: 21 March 2023 / Accepted: 22 March 2023 / Published: 23 March 2023

Abstract

The present work examines the spatial and temporal distribution of positive and negative TEC anomalies on the global and regional scale. To study the local response of the ionosphere, foF2 data from ground ionosonde stations and TEC data from Madrigal and CODE databases have been used. The relative deviation, which also determines the type of TEC response during geomagnetic storms on 3 and 4 February 2022, is considered. In the present study, the regions of positive and negative TEC anomalies and their evolution during storms are examined in detail. As a result of the study, estimates of the following were obtained: (i) the location of the sectors of the polar regions, in where the particle precipitation from the solar wind is observed, (ii) the mid-latitude regions, in which the mechanism of influence of the O/N2 ratio dominates, and (iii) the region around the equator, in which the influence of the electric field dominates. An attempt was made to determine which mechanism of influence of geomagnetic storms on the ionospheric electron density is dominant in different regions. The following main mechanisms are considered: (a) the additional ionization from the particles’ precipitation, (b) the change of the ratio of atomic oxygen (O) to molecular nitrogen (N2) due to the heating of the neutral air, and (c) the influence on the equatorial ionospheric anomaly.
Keywords: TEC; geomagnetic storm; ionospheric anomalies TEC; geomagnetic storm; ionospheric anomalies

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Bojilova, R.; Mukhtarov, P. Comparative Analysis of Global and Regional Ionospheric Responses during Two Geomagnetic Storms on 3 and 4 February 2022. Remote Sens. 2023, 15, 1739. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs15071739

AMA Style

Bojilova R, Mukhtarov P. Comparative Analysis of Global and Regional Ionospheric Responses during Two Geomagnetic Storms on 3 and 4 February 2022. Remote Sensing. 2023; 15(7):1739. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs15071739

Chicago/Turabian Style

Bojilova, Rumiana, and Plamen Mukhtarov. 2023. "Comparative Analysis of Global and Regional Ionospheric Responses during Two Geomagnetic Storms on 3 and 4 February 2022" Remote Sensing 15, no. 7: 1739. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs15071739

APA Style

Bojilova, R., & Mukhtarov, P. (2023). Comparative Analysis of Global and Regional Ionospheric Responses during Two Geomagnetic Storms on 3 and 4 February 2022. Remote Sensing, 15(7), 1739. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs15071739

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop