INSPIRE-SAT 7, a Second CubeSat to Measure the Earth’s Energy Budget and to Probe the Ionosphere
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Scientific Objectives of the INSPIRE-SAT 7 Mission
2.1. Earth’s Energy Budget Components and Earth’s Energy Imbalance
2.2. Ionosphere
2.3. Total Solar Irradiance and Solar Spectral Irradiance (SSI) in the Herzberg Continuum
3. Description of the INSPIRE-SAT 7 Mission and Mission Operations
3.1. The Space Segment—The INSPIRE-SAT 7 CubeSat Platform
- The satellite is spinning at 2° s rate around each axis,
- The efficiency of the solar cells is set to 29.11% that takes into account mechanical and assembly losses, and aging of the solar cells (1 year),
- Solar cells temperature is taken to be 20 °C,
- The solar flux is assumed to be 1362 Wm [12].
3.2. The Space Segment—The INSPIRE-SAT 7 CubeSat Payload
3.2.1. The ERS Sensors
3.2.2. The TSIS and UVS Sensors (Standard and New Generation)
3.2.3. The CUIONO1 Payload
- -
- The HF antenna
- -
- The SDR electronic board
- -
- Communication with INSPIRE-SAT 7 OBC
- -
- Calibration
3.2.4. The Li-Fi Payload
3.2.5. The SPINO Amateur Radio Payload and the LATMOS Audio Transponder (LAT 2)
- Receiver function for remote control commands from ground,
- Managed or Autonomous beacon (support for OBC failure),
- Data stream (uplink and downlink),
- Antenna deploy support.
- VHF: TX (+30 dBm) and RX 144–146 MHz,
- UHF: TX (+30 dBm) and RX 430–440 MHz.
3.2.6. The INSPIRE-SAT 7 IMU
3.3. The Ground Segment—The UHF/VHF Station
3.4. INSPIRE-SAT 7 Mission Concept of Operations and Calibration and Validation (Cal/Val)
- Operations before launch and launch,
- Launch early operations and satellite platform in-orbit verification,
- Instrument in-orbit verification and operations calibration/validation (Cal/Val) of the instruments payload,
- End of life of the INSPIRE-SAT 7 CubeSat.
- Separation of INSPIRE-SAT 7 from the launcher. Automatic platform start-up in ‘INIT’ mode.
- T0 + 15 min: Sequence of deployment of telecommunication antennas (INSPIRE-SAT 7 platform).
- T0 + 30 min: Sequence of deployment of the CUIONO1 payload antennas (INSPIRE-SAT 7 payload).
- T0 + 40 min: Switch to ‘Detumbling’ mode—iMTQ board On during 5 min to stabilize the CubeSat.
- T0 + 45 min: Switch to ‘Stand-by mode’ and waiting for the first tele-command (TC) from the LATMOS ground station.
- If after 4 days, no TC is received by the CubeSat, the initialization procedure is restarted in ‘debugging’ mode (deployment of the telecommunication antennas). And this every 4 days until receipt of the first TC.
- T0 + 4 days: Switch to ‘Nominal mode’ using a TC from LATMOS ground station.
- A pre-launch phase instruments characterizations and on-ground calibration. Several tests are planned to determine with accuracy the pre-flight absolute uncertainty of scientific variables of interest for the INSPIRE-SAT 7 mission (OSR, OLR, TSI, UV SSI). A first pre-flight absolute calibration of each ERS sensor will be done with the LATMOS BX-500 blackbody, which offers a wide field of view for the calibration of the sensors. The blackbody (diameter of 57 mm, emissivity of 0.95, minimum distance with the sensors of around 40 mm) will be operated at several set-point increments of 5 K from 323 K to 343 K. The pre-flight absolute calibration of each ERS sensor will also be carried out with the BB 3200 pg (as pyrolytic-graphite) blackbody of Physikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt (Germany) as primary standard [19,20]. The BB 3200 pg blackbody (opening area of 111.4 mm, minimum distance with the sensors of around 700 mm) will be operated at several temperatures between 2800 K and 3150 K. Finally, the INSPIRE-SAT 7 CubeSat will be integrated into the LATMOS/OVSQ INTRA Solar Tracker (0.038° resolution) to calibrate the ERS sensors in visible bands toward the Sun. Ground-based pyranometers (Kimo SAM30 (400 to 1100 nm, unidirectional, 1 to 1300 Wm) and Kipp & Zonen SMP6-V (270 to 3000 nm, field of view of 180°, 0 to 1600 Wm with an uncertainty of ±20 Wm)) will also be integrated on the solar tracker to provide an independent measurement of the solar flux that could be compared to that measured by the ERS sensors. From these different tests led by LATMOS, a pre-flight absolute uncertainty close to ±5 Wm (1 ) is expected for OSR and OLR.A pre-flight absolute calibration of the TSIS sensors will be done with a LATMOS test bench that simulates an artificial Sun (Newton telescope (focal of 1410 mm, diameter of 20 cm, image field of 0.5°), Xenon arc lamp (model 6269) of 1000 W where the Xenon lines dominate between 750 and 1000 nm, but the spectrum is almost featureless through the ultraviolet and visible). A pre-flight absolute calibration will also be done with the INTRA Solar Tracker. From these different tests led by LATMOS, a pre-flight absolute uncertainty close to few % is expected for TSI.A pre-flight absolute calibration of the UVS sensors will be done with a LATMOS test bench (Stellarnet SL3 deuterium light source (UV for the 190–450 nm range, power output of 15 Wm), chopper, scanning monochromator Optometrics SDMC1-01, Keithley 2450 sourcemeter (I-ranges of 10 nA to 1 A, 0.012% of accuracy)). Finally, the UV-VIS BIRA-IASB facilities will be used for the calibration of the UVS sensors. This facility delivers a monochromatic and tunable light beam produced by a combination of a double monochromator, and different lamps (UV arc lamp, solar simulator, tungsten lamp). The output monochromatic light can be collimated or injected in a large (∼30 cm) integrating sphere for spectral response characterization or flat field measurements. From these different tests led by LATMOS and BIRA-IASB, a pre-flight absolute uncertainty close to few % is expected for UV SSI.No direct on-orbit calibration is possible because the CubeSat is too small to integrate in-flight calibration sources. For ERS sensors, we use carbon nanotubes that are not subject to aging in orbit. The aging of these sensors is considered as weak. However, payload electronics can undergo aging in orbit. Thus, standard (etalon) currents have been integrated into the INSPIRE-SAT 7 payload printed circuit board to check the stability of the sensors electronic (ERS, TSIS, UVS). In the future, we wish to use sources of gallium (melting point of 302.91 K) to monitor the aging of ERS sensors for example.
- A commissioning phase lasting approximately 1 month will be performed for INSPIRE-SAT 7 where all instrument operation aspects will be verified and in-orbit calibration and validation activities will be initiated with a validation of the 3-axis accelerometer/gyroscope/compass inertial measurement unit, a determination of the magnetic field of the Earth, a determination of the attitude of the satellite using the TRIAD and MEKF methods, a determination of the flux measured by the sensors (OSR, OLR, TSI, UV SSI), and a technological validation of the different instruments (Li-Fi payload led by LATMOS and Oledcomm, CUIONO1 payload led by ONERA, SPINO payload led by LATMOS and Adrelys).
- An exploitation phase that will extend for the duration of the mission in which calibration and validation activities will continue with the main goal to obtain the main scientific data products. A quantification of the instruments aging will be done. Possible corrections will be carried out.
4. UVSQ-SAT CubeSat Observations in Orbit and Future Observations (INSPIRE-SAT 7, Terra F)
4.1. UVSQ-SAT Real Observations and INSPIRE-SAT 7 Simulated Observations
- Comparisons with the ERA 5 model (a, d). ERA 5 is produced by the Copernicus climate change service at the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF). ERA 5 is a combination of past observations with models to generate consistent time series of multiple climate variables. It is the fifth-generation reanalysis for the global climate and weather [21]. The purpose of that new dataset was to replace the ERA-Interim, that was implemented in 2006 and was stopped in August 2019. The different objectives of that new implementation were to improve the spatio-temporal resolution, to allow uncertainty estimate, and to add new inputs to the large list. It now reaches a spatial resolution up to 0.25° × 0.25° with hourly maps around the whole globe. The ERA 5 model is used to provide OSR and OLR at TOA for a given period (average over a month of data, for example).
- Simulated maps using the ERA 5 model as seen by UVSQ-SAT along its track (b, e). These maps are obtained from the determination of the real UVSQ-SAT ground track as a function of time. This ground track is calculated from the two-line element set. Once the position (latitude, longitude) of the UVSQ-SAT CubeSat is determined from ground track, OSR and OLR at TOA time series are obtained from ERA 5 as they would be observed by the UVSQ-SAT CubeSat in orbit (field of view, altitude). OSR and OLR maps are reconstructed from these time series for a given period.
- Reconstructed maps from observations made by UVSQ-SAT (c, f). The reconstructed method from observations is explained in detail in [2]. This method is used to provide UVSQ-SAT OSR and OLR at TOA for a given period.
4.2. The Terra-F Constellation
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
Abbreviations
List of acronyms | |
Acronym | Definition |
ADC | Analog-to-Digital Converter |
ADCS | Attitude Determination and Control Subsystem |
AMSAT | The Radio Amateur Satellite Corporation |
ASIC | Application-Specific Integrated Circuit |
BOL | Beginning Of Life |
CAN FD | Controller Area Network Flexible Data-Rate |
CDHS | Command and Data Handling Subsystem |
CUIONO1 | Charge Utile IONOsphérique 1 (Ionospheric payload) |
DB | DaughterBoard |
ECMWF | European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts |
ECV | Essential Climate Variable |
EEI | Earth’s Energy Imbalance |
EEPROM | Electrically-Erasable Programmable Read-Only Memory |
ERB | Earth’s Radiation Budget |
ERS | Earth Radiative Sensor |
FM | Frequency modulation |
FOV | Field Of View |
GOES | Geostationary Operational Environmental Satellites |
GPIO | General Purpose Input/Output |
GPS | Global Positioning System |
HF | High Frequency |
I2C | Inter-Integrated Circuit |
IARU | International Amateur Radio Union |
IMU | Inertial Measurement Unit |
iMTQ | ISIS MagneTorQuer |
INSPIRE | International Satellite Program in Research and Education |
ISIS | Innovative Solutions In Space |
LATMOS | Laboratoire ATMosphères, Observations Spatiales |
LAT-2 | LATMOS FM amateur radio transponder |
LED | Light-Emitting Diode |
LEO | Low Earth Orbit |
LEOP | Launch and Early Orbit Phase |
Li-Fi | Light Fidelity |
LTDN | Local Time at Descending Node |
MEKF | Multiplicative Extended Kalman Filter |
OAP | Orbit Average Power |
OBC | OnBoard Computer |
OHC | Ocean Heat Content |
OLR | Outgoing Longwave Radiation |
OSR | Outgoing Shortwave Radiation |
OVSQ | Observatoire de Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines |
PCB | Printed Circuit Board |
SDR | Software-Defined Radio |
SNR | Signal to Noise Ratio |
SPI | Serial Peripheral Interface |
SSI | Solar Spectral Irradiance |
SSO | Sun-synchronous Orbit |
TOA | Top Of the Atmosphere |
TOTEM | Flight proven high performance SDR platform designed for CubeSats |
TRIAD | Tri-Axial Attitude Determination |
TSI | Total Solar Irradiance |
TSIS | Total Solar Irradiance Sensor |
TRXVU | Transceiver |
UART | Universal Asynchronous Receiver-Transmitter |
UHF | Ultra High Frequency |
UVS | Ultra-Violet Sensor |
UVSQ-SAT | UltraViolet and infrared Sensors at high Quantum efficiency onboard a small SATellite |
VHF | Very High Frequency |
References
- Meftah, M.; Damé, L.; Keckhut, P.; Bekki, S.; Sarkissian, A.; Hauchecorne, A.; Bertran, E.; Carta, J.P.; David, R.; Sadok, A.; et al. UVSQ-SAT, a pathfinder cubesat mission for observing essential climate variables. Remote Sens. 2020, 12, 92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Meftah, M.; Boutéraon, T.; Dufour, C.; Hauchecorne, A.; Keckhut, P.; Finance, A.; Bekki, S.; Abbaki, S.; Bertran, E.; Damé, L.; et al. The UVSQ-SAT/INSPIRESat-5 CubeSat Mission: First In-Orbit Measurements of the Earth’s Outgoing Radiation. Remote Sens. 2021, 13, 1449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Von Schuckmann, K.; Cheng, L.; Palmer, M.D.; Hansen, J.; Tassone, C.; Aich, V.; Adusumilli, S.; Beltrami, H.; Boyer, T.; Cuesta-Valero, F.J.; et al. Heat stored in the Earth system: Where does the energy go? Earth Syst. Sci. Data 2020, 12, 2013–2041. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- von Schuckmann, K.; Palmer, M.D.; Trenberth, K.E.; Cazenave, A.; Chambers, D.; Champollion, N.; Hansen, J.; Josey, S.A.; Loeb, N.; Mathieu, P.P.; et al. An imperative to monitor Earth’s energy imbalance. Nat. Clim. Chang. 2016, 6, 138–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Loeb, N.G.; Johnson, G.C.; Thorsen, T.J.; Lyman, J.M.; Rose, F.G.; Kato, S. Satellite and Ocean Data Reveal Marked Increase in Earth’s Heating Rate. Geophys. Res. Lett. 2021, 48, e93047. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hunsucker, R.D. Radio Techniques for Probing the Terrestrial Ionosphere; Physics and Chemistry in Space; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 1991; Volume 22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Galkin, I.A.; Khmyrov, G.M.; Kozlov, A.; Reinisch, B.W.; Huang, X.; Kitrosser, D.F. Ionosonde networking, databasing, and Web serving. Radio Sci. 2006, 41, RS5S33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Friis-Christensen, E.; Lühr, H.; Knudsen, D.; Haagmans, R. Swarm—An Earth Observation Mission investigating Geospace. Adv. Space Res. 2008, 41, 210–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yau, A.W.; James, H.G. CASSIOPE Enhanced Polar Outflow Probe (e-POP) Mission Overview. Space Sci. Rev. 2015, 189, 3–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Jin, Y.; Clausen, L.B.N.; Spicher, A.; Ivarsen, M.F.; Moen, J.I. Ionospheric Irregularities in the Cusp Ionosphere: In situ Observations by NorSat-1 Satellite. In Proceedings of the 2020 XXXIIIrd General Assembly and Scientific Symposium of the International Union of Radio Science, Rome, Italy, 29 August–5 September 2020; pp. 1–4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, T.; Yang, G.; Hu, Y.; Jiang, C.; Lan, T.; Zhao, Z.; Ni, B. A Novel Ionospheric Sounding Network Based on Complete Complementary Code and Its Application. Sensors 2019, 19, 779. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Meftah, M.; Dewitte, S.; Irbah, A.; Chevalier, A.; Conscience, C.; Crommelynck, D.; Janssen, E.; Mekaoui, S. SOVAP/Picard, a Spaceborne Radiometer to Measure the Total Solar Irradiance. Sol. Phys. 2014, 289, 1885–1899. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Meftah, M.; Damé, L.; Bolsée, D.; Hauchecorne, A.; Pereira, N.; Sluse, D.; Cessateur, G.; Irbah, A.; Bureau, J.; Weber, M.; et al. SOLAR-ISS: A new reference spectrum based on SOLAR/SOLSPEC observations. Astron. Astrophys. 2018, 611, A1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Puig-Suari, J.; Schoos, J.; Turner, C.; Wagner, T.; Connolly, R.; Block, R.P. CubeSat developments at Cal Poly: The standard deployer and PolySat. In Small Payloads in Space, Proceedings of the International Symposium on Optical Science and Technology, San Diego, CA, USA, 30 July–4 August 2000; Horais, B.J., Twiggs, R.J., Eds.; SPIE: Bellingham, WA, USA, 2000; Volume 4136, pp. 72–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Twiggs, R.J. Space system developments at Stanford University: From launch experience of microsatellites to the proposed future use of picosatellites. In Small Payloads in Space, Proceedings of the International Symposium on Optical Science and Technology, San Diego, CA, USA, 30 July–4 August 2000; Horais, B.J., Twiggs, R.J., Eds.; SPIE: Bellingham, WA, USA, 2000; Volume 4136, pp. 79–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Finance, A.; Dufour, C.; Boutéraon, T.; Sarkissian, A.; Mangin, A.; Keckhut, P.; Meftah, M. In-Orbit Attitude Determination of the UVSQ-SAT CubeSat Using TRIAD and MEKF Methods. Sensors 2021, 21, 7361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- BenMoussa, A.; Gissot, S.; Schühle, U.; Del Zanna, G.; Auchère, F.; Mekaoui, S.; Jones, A.R.; Walton, D.; Eyles, C.J.; Thuillier, G.; et al. On-Orbit Degradation of Solar Instruments. Sol. Phys. 2013, 288, 389–434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Meftah, M.; Dominique, M.; BenMoussa, A.; Dammasch, I.E.; Bolsée, D.; Pereira, N.; Damé, L.; Bekki, S.; Hauchecorne, A. On-orbit degradation of recent space-based solar instruments and understanding of the degradation processes. In Proceedings of the Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, Anaheim, CA, USA, 9–13 April 2017; Volume 10196, p. 1019606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sperfeld, P.; Metzdorf, J.; Galal Yousef, S.; Stock, K.D.; Möller, W. Improvement and extension of the black-body-based spectral irradiance scale. Metrologia 1998, 35, 267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sperfeld, P.; Galal Yousef, S.; Metzdorf, J.; Nawo, B.; Möller, W. The use of self-consistent calibrations to recover absorption bands in the black-body spectrum. Metrologia 2000, 37, 373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hersbach, H.; Bell, B.; Berrisford, P.; Hirahara, S.; Horányi, A.; Muñoz-Sabater, J.; Nicolas, J.; Peubey, C.; Radu, R.; Schepers, D.; et al. The ERA5 global reanalysis. Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc. 2020, 146, 1999–2049. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Requirements | UVSQ-SAT | |||
Parameter | Absolute accuracy | Stability per year | Spatial resolution | Temporal resolution |
OSR | ±10.00 Wm | ±5.00 Wm | 2500 km | 30 days |
OLR | ±10.00 Wm | ±1.00 Wm | 2500 km | 30 days |
Requirements | INSPIRE-SAT 7 | |||
Parameter | Absolute accuracy | Stability per year | Spatial resolution | Temporal resolution |
OSR | ±5.00 Wm | ±1.00 Wm | 2500 km | 10 days with 2 CubeSats |
OLR | ±5.00 Wm | ±1.00 Wm | 2500 km | 10 days with 2 CubeSats |
Requirements | Terra-F | |||
Parameter | Absolute accuracy | Stability per decade | Spatial resolution | Temporal resolution |
TSI | ±0.54 Wm | ±0.14 Wm | – | 24 h |
OSR | ±1.00 Wm | ±0.10 Wm | 10–100 km | Diurnal cycle (3 h) |
OLR | ±1.00 Wm | ±0.10 Wm | 10–100 km | Diurnal cycle (3 h) |
EEI | ±1.00 Wm | ±0.10 Wm | – | – |
Properties | Value | Comments |
---|---|---|
Orbit | Sun-synchronous orbit | Maximum altitude of 600 km, LTDN of 09:30 |
Design life time | 2 years for LEO | 3 years desired |
Launch date | Q1 2023 | Launch vehicle: Falcon 9 |
Size | 2 U | 11.5 cm (X) × 11.5 cm (Y) × 22.7 cm (Z) |
Mass | 3.0 kg | Maximum with margins |
Solar cells | 20 | 3G30A solar cells provided by Azurspace |
Batteries | 45 Wh@16 V | 4 Panasonic batteries (NCR18650B) with heaters |
Power generated | 3.8 W | OAP in LEO |
Power consumption | 3.2 W | Maximum orbit average with margins |
ADCS | 3-axis magnetometer | Measurements of the local Earth magnetic field |
3-axis magnetorquer | 0.2 Am magnetic dipole | |
6 SLCD-61N8 photodiodes | Coarse estimation of the Sun’s direction () | |
CDHS and OBC | 400 MHz, 32-bit ARM9 | Processor |
32 MB SDRAM | Synchronous Dynamic Random Access Memory | |
2 × 2 GB SD-cards | Non-volatile data storage (SD card redundancy) | |
1 MB NOR flash | Code storage | |
IC, SPI, UARTs | UART is only used for debugging iOBC | |
Data downlink | 1.2/9.6 kbps | UHF BPSK (437.410 MHz) communication |
Data uplink | 9.6 kbps | VHF FSK (145.970 MHz) communication |
Ground contact station | Less than 1 h per day | LATMOS station |
Redundancy stations | LATMOS | Other stations: amateur radio partners |
Downlink UVSQ-SAT data | 1.8 Mbyte per day | Maximum during a day |
Uplink UVSQ-SAT data | 0.3 Mbyte per day | Maximum during a day |
Payload | 12 ERS | ERB measurements |
4 TSIS | TSI measurements | |
10 UVS | UV SSI and ozone measurements | |
1 CUIONO1 payload | Ionospheric measurements | |
1 Li-Fi payload | Wireless communication system | |
1 SPINO payload | Functions for amateur radio community | |
Audio transponder | FM live retransmission (amateur radio) | |
1 IMU | 3-axis accelerometer/gyroscope/compass | |
Launch adapter | ISIPOD or Quad-pack | CubeSat deployer with a satellite mass up to 3 kg |
Type | Location | N | Sensitivity | Range | Resolution | Noise |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ERS | +X, −X, +Y, −Y | 4 | 1.5 V/Wm | [−4500 … 4500 V] | 34.3 nV/bit | 150 nV rms |
ERS | +X, −X, +Y, −Y | 4 | 1.5 V/Wm | [−4500 … 4500 V] | 34.3 nV/bit | 150 nV rms |
ERS | +Z, −Z | 2 | 0.2 V/Wm | [−750 … 750 V] | 5.7 nV/bit | 25 nV rms |
ERS | +Z, −Z | 2 | 0.2 V/Wm | [−750 … 750 V] | 5.7 nV/bit | 25 nV rms |
T | 2 per side | 12 | 1.0 A K | [−70 … 70 A] | 0.5 nA/bit | 100 nA rms |
Sensor | N | Aperture | P | Range | Resolution | Noise | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TSIS | 4 | ∅ 1 mm | 0–1100 nm | ∼0.21 AW | [0 … 250 nA] | 9.5 × 10 nA/bit | <0.1 nA rms |
UVS | 4 | 500 × 800 m | 215 nm | ∼0.01 AW | [0 … 250 nA] | 9.5 × 10 nA/bit | <0.1 nA rms |
UVS | 3 | ∅ 3 mm | 308 nm | ∼0.14 AW | [0 … 3000 nA] | 11.4 pA/bit | <0.1 nA rms |
UVS | 3 | ∅ 3 mm | 340 nm | ∼0.15 AW | [0 … 3000 nA] | 11.4 pA/bit | <0.1 nA rms |
Parameters | Li-Fi Payload Performances |
---|---|
Parameters | Li-Fi payload characteristics |
Protocol of communication | I2C |
Data Rate | 5 Mbps |
Distance of communication | 1 to 2 cm |
Field of view | 10° |
Wavelength | 940 nm |
PCB dimensions | 90 × 95 × 8 mm |
Weight | 70 g |
Consumption | 1 W peak |
Power Supply | 5 V |
Telemetry | Data rate, latency, jitter |
Telemetry | <200 Bytes per communication with the OBC |
Parameter | Requirements |
---|---|
IMU signal range | Accelerometer: ±2.0 g |
Gyroscope: ±250.0 deg | |
Compass: ±491.2 T | |
IMU resolution | 16 bits |
IMU noise detection | Accelerometer: <250 g/ |
Gyroscope: <0.02 deg/s/ | |
IMU time response | <20 ms |
Acquisition integration time | <10 s |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Meftah, M.; Boust, F.; Keckhut, P.; Sarkissian, A.; Boutéraon, T.; Bekki, S.; Damé, L.; Galopeau, P.; Hauchecorne, A.; Dufour, C.; et al. INSPIRE-SAT 7, a Second CubeSat to Measure the Earth’s Energy Budget and to Probe the Ionosphere. Remote Sens. 2022, 14, 186. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs14010186
Meftah M, Boust F, Keckhut P, Sarkissian A, Boutéraon T, Bekki S, Damé L, Galopeau P, Hauchecorne A, Dufour C, et al. INSPIRE-SAT 7, a Second CubeSat to Measure the Earth’s Energy Budget and to Probe the Ionosphere. Remote Sensing. 2022; 14(1):186. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs14010186
Chicago/Turabian StyleMeftah, Mustapha, Fabrice Boust, Philippe Keckhut, Alain Sarkissian, Thomas Boutéraon, Slimane Bekki, Luc Damé, Patrick Galopeau, Alain Hauchecorne, Christophe Dufour, and et al. 2022. "INSPIRE-SAT 7, a Second CubeSat to Measure the Earth’s Energy Budget and to Probe the Ionosphere" Remote Sensing 14, no. 1: 186. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs14010186
APA StyleMeftah, M., Boust, F., Keckhut, P., Sarkissian, A., Boutéraon, T., Bekki, S., Damé, L., Galopeau, P., Hauchecorne, A., Dufour, C., Finance, A., Vieau, A. -J., Bertran, E., Gilbert, P., Caignard, N., Dias, C., Engler, J. -L., Lacroix, P., Grossel, K., ... Billard, C. (2022). INSPIRE-SAT 7, a Second CubeSat to Measure the Earth’s Energy Budget and to Probe the Ionosphere. Remote Sensing, 14(1), 186. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs14010186