Next Article in Journal
R2FA-Det: Delving into High-Quality Rotatable Boxes for Ship Detection in SAR Images
Previous Article in Journal
Remotely Sensed Urban Surface Ecological Index (RSUSEI): An Analytical Framework for Assessing the Surface Ecological Status in Urban Environments
Previous Article in Special Issue
Evaluation of Satellite-Derived Surface Soil Moisture Products over Agricultural Regions of Canada
Open AccessArticle

Assessment of Remotely Sensed and Modelled Soil Moisture Data Products in the U.S. Southern Great Plains

by Bo Jiang 1,2, Hongbo Su 3,*, Kai Liu 1 and Shaohui Chen 1
The Institute of Geographical Sciences and Natural Resources Research, CAS, Beijing 100101, China
University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
Department of Civil, Environmental and Geomatics Engineering, Florida Atlantic University, Boca Raton, FL 33431, USA
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Remote Sens. 2020, 12(12), 2030;
Received: 2 June 2020 / Revised: 20 June 2020 / Accepted: 21 June 2020 / Published: 24 June 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Satellite Soil Moisture Validation and Applications)
Soil moisture (SM) plays a crucial role in the water and energy flux exchange between the atmosphere and the land surface. Remote sensing and modeling are two main approaches to obtain SM over a large-scale area. However, there is a big difference between them due to algorithm, spatial-temporal resolution, observation depth and measurement uncertainties. In this study, an assessment of the comparison of two state-of-the-art remotely sensed SM products, Soil Moisture Active Passive (SMAP) and European Space Agency Climate Change Initiative (ESACCI), and one land surface modeled dataset from the North American Land Data Assimilation System project phase 2 (NLDAS-2), were conducted using 17 permanent SM observation sites located in the Southern Great Plains (SGP) in the U.S. We first compared the daily mean SM of three products with in-situ measurements; then, we decompose the raw time series into a short-term seasonal part and anomaly by using a moving smooth window (35 days). In addition, we calculate the daily spatial difference between three products based on in-situ data and assess their temporal evolution. The results demonstrate that (1) in terms of temporal correlation R, the SMAP (R = 0.78) outperforms ESACCI (R = 0.62) and NLDAS-2 (R = 0.72) overall; (2) for the seasonal component, the correlation R of SMAP still outperforms the other two products, and the correlation R of ESACCI and NLDAS-2 have not improved like the SMAP; as for anomaly, there is no difference between the remotely sensed and modeling data, which implies the potential for the satellite products to capture the variations of short-term rainfall events; (3) the distribution pattern of spatial bias is different between the three products. For NLDAS-2, it is strongly dependent on precipitation; meanwhile, the spatial distribution of bias represents less correlation with the precipitation for two remotely sensed products, especially for the SMAP. Overall, the SMAP was superior to the other two products, especially when the SM was of low value. The difference between the remotely sensed and modeling products with respect to the vegetation type might be an important reason for the errors. View Full-Text
Keywords: SMAP; ESACCI; NLDAS-2; U.S. SGP; soil moisture SMAP; ESACCI; NLDAS-2; U.S. SGP; soil moisture
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

MDPI and ACS Style

Jiang, B.; Su, H.; Liu, K.; Chen, S. Assessment of Remotely Sensed and Modelled Soil Moisture Data Products in the U.S. Southern Great Plains. Remote Sens. 2020, 12, 2030.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

Search more from Scilit
Back to TopTop