Next Article in Journal
Near Real-Time Irrigation Detection at Plot Scale Using Sentinel-1 Data
Next Article in Special Issue
Assessment of Remotely Sensed and Modelled Soil Moisture Data Products in the U.S. Southern Great Plains
Previous Article in Journal
Monitoring 10-m LST from the Combination MODIS/Sentinel-2, Validation in a High Contrast Semi-Arid Agroecosystem
Previous Article in Special Issue
Monitoring Surface Soil Moisture Content over the Vegetated Area by Integrating Optical and SAR Satellite Observations in the Permafrost Region of Tibetan Plateau
Open AccessArticle

Evaluation of Satellite-Derived Surface Soil Moisture Products over Agricultural Regions of Canada

Department of Geography and Environmental Management, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON N2L 3G1, Canada
Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Ottawa, ON K1A 0C6, Canada
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Remote Sens. 2020, 12(9), 1455;
Received: 11 April 2020 / Revised: 23 April 2020 / Accepted: 2 May 2020 / Published: 4 May 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Satellite Soil Moisture Validation and Applications)
Soil moisture is a critical indicator for climate change and agricultural drought, but its measurement is challenging due to large variability with land cover, soil type, time, space and depth. Satellite estimates of soil moisture are highly desirable and have become more widely available over the past decade. This study investigates and compares the performance of four surface soil moisture satellite datasets over Canada, namely, Soil Moisture and Ocean Salinity Level 3 (SMOS L3), versions 3.3 and 4.2 of European Space Agency Climate Change Initiative (ESA CCI) soil moisture product and a recent product called SMOS-INRA-CESBIO (SMOS-IC) that contains corrections designed to reduce several known sources of uncertainty in SMOS L3. These datasets were evaluated against in situ networks located in mostly agricultural regions of Canada for the period 2012 to 2014. Two statistical comparison methods were used, namely, metrics for mean soil moisture and median of metrics. The results suggest that, while both methods show similar comparisons for regional networks, over large networks, the median of metrics method is more representative of the overall correlation and variability and is therefore a more appropriate method for evaluating the performance of satellite products. Overall, the SMOS products have higher daily temporal correlations, but larger biases, against in situ soil moisture than the ESA CCI products, with SMOS-IC having higher correlations and smaller variability than SMOS L3. The SMOS products capture daily wetting and drying events better than the ESA CCI products, with the SMOS products capturing at least 75% of observed drying as compared to 55% for the ESA CCI products. Overall, for periods during which there are sufficient observations, both SMOS products are more suitable for agricultural applications over Canada than the ESA CCI products, even though SMOS-IC is able to capture soil moisture variability more accurately than SMOS L3. View Full-Text
Keywords: soil moisture; agriculture; Canada; satellite; SMOS; ESA CCI soil moisture; agriculture; Canada; satellite; SMOS; ESA CCI
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

MDPI and ACS Style

Oozeer, Y.; Fletcher, C.G.; Champagne, C. Evaluation of Satellite-Derived Surface Soil Moisture Products over Agricultural Regions of Canada. Remote Sens. 2020, 12, 1455.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

Search more from Scilit
Back to TopTop