Application of Acoustic Tomography in Urban Tree Risk Assessment: A Case Study from Jarocin (Poland)
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Study Area and Sample Selection
2.2. Visual Tree Assessment (VTA)
2.3. Sonic Tomography
2.4. Data Analysis and Tree Safety Assessment Criteria
2.5. Study Design
3. Results
3.1. Objects and Reasons for Tomograph Examination
- Object No. 1—horse chestnut (Aesculus hippocastanum L.), a natural monument named “Andrzej”, located in the Radoliński Park in Jarocin



- Object No. 2—London plane (Platanus × hispanica Mill. ex Münchh. ‘Acerifolia’)—natural monument “Lucy”.
- Object No. 3—Pedunculate oak (Quercus robur L.)—natural monument named “Friedrich August”, located in Radoliński Park in Jarocin
- Object no. 4—white poplar (Populus alba L.) in Radoliński Park in Jarocin
- Object no. 5—European ash (Fraxinus excelsior L.), natural monument located by the boundary wall of the Church of St. Martin in Jarocin, Rynek Street
- Object no. 6—Small-leaved lime (Tilia cordata Mill.)—natural monument growing opposite the entrance to the Church of St. Martin
3.2. Overall Health Condition and Structural Integrity of the Assessed Trees

3.3. Assessment of Residual Wall Thickness and the t/R Ratio
3.4. Distribution of Sound Wave Velocities and Wood Condition
3.5. Significance of the Results for Risk Classification
3.6. Sustainable Management of Urban Greenery in Jarocin
- dendrological expertise—regular assessments of tree health condition;
- sustainable green space management—maintenance instead of removal;
- public participation—residents have a voice in decisions regarding urban greenery;
- compensatory planting—if a tree must be removed, new ones should be planted in return;
- legal protection—designation of trees as natural monuments or inclusion under planning protection.
3.7. Vision of the Urban Green Space Strategy for Jarocin
4. Discussion
4.1. Acoustic Tomography and Limitations of Visual Assessment
4.2. Biomechanical Interpretation of Tree Stability
4.3. Implications for Biodiversity-Oriented Urban Management
4.4. Transferability and Limitations
4.5. Verification of Research Hypotheses
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
Appendix A
| No. | Species | Trunk Circumference at Breast Height (1.3 m) [cm] | Trunk Diameter at 1 m Height [cm] | Bark Thickness [cm] | Tree Height [m] | Average Crown Spread [m] | Crown Base Height [m] | Total Crown Height [m] | GPS Coordinates |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. | Monumental horse chestnut (Aesculus hippocastanum L.) Andrzej | 354 | 112.7 | 4 | 16.6 | N-S 15.2 E-W 15.6 ~15.4 | 4.3 | 12.3 | N 51° 58′24.632″ E 17° 30′11.606″ |
| 2. | Monumental London plane (Platanus × hispanica Mill. ex Münchh. ‘Acerifolia’) Lucy | 417 | 144.9 | 2 | 25.2 | N-S 37.5 E-W 24.9 ~31.2 | 4.2 | 21 | N 51° 58′30.245″ E 17° 30′4.503″ |
| 3. | Monumental pedunculate oak (Quercus robur L.) Friedrich August | 511 | 165.6 | 6 | 20.8 | N-S 22 E-W 22.7 ~22.3 | 3,7 | 17.1 | N 51° 58′32.671″ E 17° 30′6.915″ |
| 4. | White poplar (Populus alba L.) | 453 | 138.8 | 4 | 27.8 | N-S 23.2 E-W 21 ~22.1 | 16 | 11.8 | N 51° 58′32.671″ E 17° 30′6.915″ |
| 5. | European ash (Fraxinus excelsior L.) | 495 | 171 | 4 | 17.5 | N-S 13 E-W 20.7 ~16.8 | 3 | 14.5 | N 51°58′23.326″ E 17°30′4.255″ |
| 6. | Monumental small-leaved lime (Tilia cordata Mill.) | 380 | 138.8 | 4 | 23.6 | N-S 13.1 E-W 19.5 ~16.3 | 7.4 | 16.2 | N 51°58′23.401″ E 17°30′5″ |
References
- Ampoorter, E.; De Schrijver, A.; De Frenne, P.; Hermy, M.; Verheyen, K. Experimental assessment of ecological restoration options for compacted forest soils. Ecol. Eng. 2011, 37, 1734–1746. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Stojnić, S.; Suchocka, M.; Benito-Garzón, M.; Torres-Ruiz, J.M.; Cochard, H.; Bolte, A.; Cocozza, C.B.; de Luis, M.; Martinez-Vilalta, J. Variation in xylem vulnerability to embolism in European beech from geographically marginal populations. Plant Physiol. 2018, 178, 173–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Blicharska, M.; Mikusiński, G. Incorporating social and cultural significance of large old trees in conservation policy. Conserv. Biol. 2014, 28, 1558–1567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Olchowik, J.; Suchocka, M.; Malewski, T.; Baczewska-Dąbrowska, A.; Studnicki, M.; Hilszczańska, D. The ectomycorrhizal community of Crimean linden trees in Warsaw, Poland. Forests 2020, 11, 926. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mattheck, C. Updated Field Guide for Visual Tree Assessment; Forschungszentrum Karlsruhe: Karlsruhe, Germany, 2007. [Google Scholar]
- Suchocka, M. Zalety i ograniczenia stosowania wizualnej metody oceny drzew (VTA) jako odpowiedź na problemy związane z zagrożeniami powodowanymi przez drzewa. Człow. Sr. 2012, 36, 97–110. [Google Scholar]
- Bieker, D.; Kehr, R.; Weber, G.; Rust, S. Non-destructive monitoring of early stages of white rot by Trametes versicolor in Fraxinus excelsior. Ann. For. Sci. 2010, 67, 210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gao, S.; Wang, X.; Wiemann, M.; Brashaw, B.; Ross, R.; Wang, L. A Critical Analysis of Methods for Rapid and Nondestructive Determination of Wood Density in Standing Trees. Ann. For. Sci. 2017, 74, 27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dudkiewicz, M.; Durlak, W. Sustainable management of very large trees with the use of acoustic tomography. Sustainability 2021, 13, 12315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dudkiewicz, M.; Kopacki, M.; Iwanek, M.; Hortyńska, P. Problemy zachowania bioróżnorodności na przykładzie wybranych miast Polski. Agron. Sci. 2021, 76, 67–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mölder, A.; Schmidt, M.; Plieninger, T.; Meyer, P. Habitat-tree protection concepts over 200 years. Conserv. Biol. 2020, 34, 1444–1451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Szczepanowska, H.B. Miejsce zieleni w strukturze projektowania, zarządzania i oceny ekologicznej inwestycji miejskich. Człow. Sr. 2012, 36, 5–49. [Google Scholar]
- Szczepanowska, H.B. Drzewa w mieście—Zielony kapitał wartości i usług ekosystemowych. Człow. Sr. 2015, 39, 5–28. [Google Scholar]
- Puzdrakiewicz, K. Zielona infrastruktura jako wielozadaniowe narzędzie zrównoważonego rozwoju. Stud. Miej. 2018, 27, 155–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Clark, J.R.; Matheny, N.P.; Cross, G.; Wake, V. A model of urban forest sustainability. Arboric. Urban For. 1997, 23, 17–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Konijnendijk, C.C.; Nilsson, K.; Randrup, T.B.; Schipperijn, J. Urban Forests and Trees; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2005. [Google Scholar]
- Córdoba Hernandez, R.; Camerin, F. The Application of Ecosystem Assessments in Land Use Planning: A Case Study for Supporting Decisions toward Ecosystem Protection. Futures 2024, 161, 103399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Statistics Poland (GUS) 2022: Local Data Bank—Population and Area of Jarocin (as of 31 December 2021). Available online: https://bdl.stat.gov.pl (accessed on 29 January 2026).
- Narodowy Instytut Dziedzictwa 2024: Park Radolińskich w Jarocinie—Zespół Pałacowo-Parkowy. Available online: https://zabytek.pl (accessed on 22 April 2026).
- Urząd Miejski w Jarocin 2024: Historia Miasta Jarocin i Dziedzictwo Kulturowe. Available online: https://www.jarocin.pl (accessed on 22 April 2026).
- Qiu, Q.; Qin, R.; Lam, J.H.M.; Tang, A.M.C.; Leung, M.W.K.; Lau, D. An innovative tomographic technique integrated with acoustic-laser approach for detecting defects in tree trunk. Comput. Electron. Agric. 2019, 156, 129–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- He, K.; Zhang, Y.; Li, X.; Wang, H. Construction of street tree risk assessment system integrating non-destructive testing methods. Front. Earth Sci. 2024, 12, 1338316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lin, C.-J.; Peng, P.-H.; Lin, P.-H. The impact of the number of sensors on stress wave velocity in 2D acoustic tomography of tree trunks. Forests 2025, 16, 1439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Michajlová, K.; Kováč, J.; Vojtáš, J. Evaluation of the quality of standing trees using acoustic stress tomography. For. J. 2024, 70, 45–58. [Google Scholar]
- Emerick, T.; Lima, J.T.; Silva, J.R.M. Evaluation of internal wood condition in tree trunks using non-destructive techniques. Cerne 2025, 31, e103456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bär, A.; Hamacher, M.; Ganthaler, A.; Losso, A.; Mayr, S. Electrical resistivity tomography: Patterns in Betula pendula, Fagus sylvatica, Picea abies and Pinus sylvestris. Tree Physiol. 2019, 39, 1262–1271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Durlak, W.; Dudkiewicz, M.; Milecka, M. A combined methods of senile trees inventory in sustainable urban greenery management on the example of the city of Sandomierz (Poland). Land 2022, 11, 1914. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Allikmäe, E.; Laarmann, D.; Korjus, H. Vitality assessment of visually healthy trees in Estonia. Forests 2017, 8, 223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Burcham, D.C.; Brazee, N.J.; Marra, R.E.; Kane, B. Can sonic tomography predict loss in load-bearing capacity for trees with internal defects? A comparison of sonic tomograms with destructive measurements. Trees—Struct. Funct. 2019, 33, 681–695. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Papandrea, S.F.; Romeo, F.; Pellegrino, G. Comparative evaluation of inspection techniques for decay detection in urban trees. Urban For. Urban Green. 2022, 68, 127474. [Google Scholar]
- Brudi, E.; van Wassenaer, P. Trees and statics: Nondestructive failure analysis. J. Arboric. 2002, 28, 195–201. [Google Scholar]
- James, K.R.; Haritos, N.; Ades, P.K. Mechanical stability of trees under dynamic loads. Am. J. Bot. 2006, 93, 1522–1530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Generalna Dyrekcja Ochrony Środowiska 2026: Centralny Rejestr Form Ochrony Przyrody. Available online: https://crfop.gdos.gov.pl/CRFOP (accessed on 22 April 2026).
- Roloff, A. Urban Tree Management for the Sustainable Development of Green Cities; John Wiley & Sons: West Sussex, UK, 2016; pp. 82–94. [Google Scholar]
- Google LLC 2026: Google Earth. Available online: https://earth.google.com (accessed on 22 April 2026).
- Mattheck, C.; Bethge, K. Detection of decay in trees with the Metriguard stress wave timer. J. Arboric. 1993, 19, 374–378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shigo, A.L.; Marx, H.G. Compartmentalization of Decay in Trees; U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service: Washington, DC, USA, 1977.
- Ministerstwo Środowiska 2010: Świadomość Ekologiczna Polaków—Zrównoważony Rozwój. Available online: https://www.gov.pl/web/klimat/swiadomosc-ekologiczna-polakow (accessed on 22 April 2026).
- Sellier, D.; Fourcaud, T. Crown structure and wood properties: Influence on tree sway and response to strong winds. Am. J. Bot. 2009, 96, 885–896. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jackson, T.; Shenkin, A.; Kalyan, B.; Zionts, J.; Calders, K.; Origo, N.; Disney, M.; Burt, A.; Raumonen, P.; Malhi, Y. A New Architectural Perspective on Wind Damage in a Natural Forest. Front. For. Glob. Change 2019, 1, 13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Moore, J.; Gardiner, B.; Sellier, D. Tree Mechanics and Wind Loading. In Plant Biomechanics; Geitmann, A., Gril, J., Eds.; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2018; pp. 79–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Oliveira, W.; Santos, A.; Ribeiro, P.; Silva, J. Benefits of urban trees to people and their potential for ecosystem service provision. Urban For. Urban Green. 2024, 95, 127899. [Google Scholar]
- Jovanović, S.; Petrović, D.; Milanović, M.; Stojanović, V. The role of urban tree areas for biodiversity conservation and climate resilience. Land 2025, 14, 1815. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hintural, W.P.; Atkinson, G.; Mears, M.; Rumble, H.; Rogers, K. Quantifying regulating ecosystem services provided by urban trees. Forests 2024, 15, 1446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, X.; Liu, Y.; Wu, J.; Li, D. Decision-support frameworks for urban tree planning and management under conflicting objectives. Urban For. Urban Green. 2025, 92, 127734. [Google Scholar]
- Adams, M.P.; Smith, P.L. A systematic approach to model the influence of the type and density of vegetation cover on urban heat using remote sensing. Landsc. Urban Plan. 2014, 132, 47–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ng, E.; Chen, L.; Wang, Y.; Yuan, C. A study on the cooling effects of greening in a high-density city: An experience from Hong Kong. Build. Environ. 2012, 47, 256–271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Norton, B.A.; Coutts, A.M.; Livesley, S.J.; Harris, R.J.; Hunter, A.M.; Williams, N.S.G. Planning for cooler cities: A framework to prioritise green infrastructure to mitigate high temperatures in urban landscapes. Landsc. Urban Plan. 2015, 134, 127–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Khalaim, O.; Zabarna, O.; Kazantsev, T.; Panas, I.; Polishchuk, O. Urban green infrastructure inventory as a key prerequisite to sustainable cities in Ukraine under extreme heat events. Sustainability 2021, 13, 2470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nielsen, A.; Östberg, J.; Delshammar, T. Review of urban tree inventory methods used to collect data at single-tree level. Arboric. Urban For. 2014, 40, 96–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Feltynowski, M.; Kronenberg, J.; Bergier, T.; Kabisch, N.; Łaszkiewicz, E.; Strohbach, M.W. Challenges of urban green space management in the face of using inadequate data. Urban For. Urban Green. 2018, 31, 56–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hubacek, K.; Kronenberg, J. Synthesizing different perspectives on the value of urban ecosystem services. Landsc. Urban Plan. 2013, 109, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kane, B.; Smiley, E.T.; Fraedrich, B.R.; Watson, G. Tree risk assessment: Advancing from visual inspection to integrated diagnostic approaches. Arboric. Urban For. 2023, 49, 1–12. [Google Scholar]
- Rahman, M.A.; Armson, D.; Ennos, A.R. A framework for urban tree management decision-making under climate stress. Urban For. Urban Green. 2022, 74, 127642. [Google Scholar]
- Esteban, M.; Pérez, F.; Gómez, L. Comparison of acoustic tomography and resistance drilling for detecting internal defects in standing trees. Forests 2025, 16, 1125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]


























| Tree No. | Species | Status | Healthy Wood (%) | Damaged Wood (%) | Transition Wood (%) | t/R | Min Wall Thickness (cm) | MOI Range (%) | Sound Velocity Range (m·s−1) | VTA vs. Tomography |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Aesculus hippocastanum | Monument | 72 | 19 | 9 | 0.31 | 17.3 | 54.7–89.3 | 651–1476 | Underestimated risk |
| 2 | Platanus × hispanica | Monument | 79 | 12 | 9 | 0.32 | 21.0 | 50.6–52.5 | 787–1683 | Consistent |
| 3 | Quercus robur | Monument | 55 | 33 | 12 | 0.30 | 24.0 | 9.8–41.4 | 451–1741 | Overestimated risk |
| 4 | Populus alba | Non-monument | 33 | 47 | 20 | 0.20 | 14.2 | 3.5–66.4 | 234–1260 | Underestimated risk |
| 5 | Fraxinus excelsior | Monument | 88 | 7 | 5 | 0.25 | 20.0 | 94.7–97.8 | 581–1709 | Overestimated risk |
| 6 | Tilia cordata | Monument | 33 | 56 | 11 | 0.30 | 18.5 | 5.6–45.7 | 244–1044 | Borderline |
| Tree No. | Species | t/R | Structural Condition | Risk Level | Recommended Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Aesculus hippocastanum | 0.31 | Good | Low | Retain, periodic monitoring |
| 2 | Platanus × hispanica | 0.32 | Very good | Low | Retain |
| 3 | Quercus robur | 0.30 | Moderate | Moderate | Monitoring, possible pruning |
| 4 | Populus alba | 0.20 | Weak | High | Detailed monitoring, risk mitigation |
| 5 | Fraxinus excelsior | 0.25 | Moderate | Moderate | Monitoring, structural support |
| 6 | Tilia cordata | 0.30 | Borderline | Moderate | Frequent monitoring |
| No. | English Name/Latin Name | Remarks/Recommendations |
|---|---|---|
| 1. | Horse chestnut (Aesculus hippocastanum L.)—natural monument named “Andrzej” | Removal of deadwood and wound protection in accordance with arboricultural principles by a team qualified in the care of veteran trees. Annual monitoring of health condition. |
| 2. | London plane (Platanus × hispanica Mill. ex Munch. ‘Acerifolia’)—natural monument named “Lucy” | Removal of deadwood in accordance with arboricultural principles by a team qualified in the care of veteran trees. Monitoring of health condition every 2 years. |
| 3. | Pedunculate oak (Quercus robur L.)—natural monument named “Friedrich August” | Removal of branch deadwood in accordance with arboricultural principles by a team qualified in the care of veteran trees. Inspection of bracing systems. Monitoring of health condition every 2 years. |
| 4. | White poplar (Populus alba L.) | Removal of deadwood in accordance with arboricultural principles by a team qualified in the care of veteran trees. Annual monitoring of health condition. Consider installation of a dynamic bracing system (Cobra type) connecting both leaders. |
| 5. | European ash (Fraxinus excelsior L.)—natural monument | Removal of deadwood in accordance with arboricultural principles by a team qualified in the care of veteran trees. Inspection of bracing systems. Annual monitoring of health condition. |
| 6. | Small-leaved lime (Tilia cordata Mill.)—natural monument | Removal of deadwood and crown correction in accordance with arboricultural principles by a team qualified in the care of veteran trees. Improvement of site conditions by increasing the biologically active surface area around the trunk. Annual monitoring of health condition. |
| Vision 2030—A City of Functional Greenery and an Aware Resident |
|---|
| Strategic goal: Creation of a coherent system of urban greenery as an integral part of the city’s infrastructure—improving quality of life, residents’ health, and resilience to climate change. |
| Key actions: Revitalization of all major parks and squares, taking into account water retention and biodiversity. Establishment of flower meadows and community gardens on unused land. Implementation of a digital green space management system (GIS + sensors + monitoring). Education of residents—programs for schools, gardening workshops, informational campaigns. Green participatory budget—residents decide on green investments. |
| Outcome: Jarocin as a green city, with a network of parks and squares positively influencing the local climate and residents’ health. |
| Vision 2050—Jarocin as a City of Green Infrastructure and Symbiosis with Nature |
|---|
| Strategic goal: Integration of urban greenery with the entire urban structure—as a system of ecosystem services supporting the sustainable development of the city. |
| Key actions: Green corridors connecting districts, parks, villages, and natural areas. Green roofs and façades as a standard in public construction. Urban agroecology—support for local, ecological cultivation within urban areas. Use of greenery for energy production (e.g., through microbiological bioenergy technologies). Green buffer zones—natural barriers reducing noise, air pollution, and flooding. |
| Outcome: Jarocin as a model “medium-sized green city” in Poland, attracting residents and investments thanks to its ecological identity and quality of life. |
| Stage I—YEARS 2025–2030|“Green Foundation” | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Year | Operational goal | Key actions | Success indicators |
| 2025 | Greenery audit and systemic planning | Digital inventory of greenery Map of needs and potentials | Completion of greenery map Diagnostic report |
| 2026 | Maintenance and revitalization of existing greenery | Comprehensive revitalization of Radoliński Park Replacement of worn-out trees | % of revitalized green areas (min. 40%) Number of planted trees |
| 2027 | Neighborhood and community green spaces | Establishment of community gardens “Green Courtyards” program | Number of active resident groups (min. 10) Number of community gardens (min. 5) |
| 2028 | Green-blue infrastructure | Construction of rain gardens Street-level water retention | Retention capacity (m3) Number of completed pilot projects |
| 2029 | Education and participation | Green lessons in schools Application for reporting greenery-related issues | Number of application downloads (min. 1000) Schools with green program (min. 80%) |
| 2030 | System coherence and integration | Connecting parks and squares into a “green network” | Number of connected green enclaves (min. 10) Length of pedestrian and cycling routes within green areas |
| Stage II—YEARS 2031–2050|“Green City of the Future” | |||
| Period | Key actions | Strategic goal | Success indicators |
| 2031–2035 | Urban green infrastructure | Green roofs and façades on 10% of public buildings Green bus stops and streets | Area of green roofs (m2) Number of green bus stops |
| 2036–2040 | Green economy and energy | Bio-green energy zones Recycling of green biomass | Energy production from bio-greenery (kWh) Tonnage of greenery processed locally |
| 2041–2045 | Green satellite towns | Expansion of the green system to villages and suburban areas | Number of municipal gardens and parks near villages 5-min green accessibility index (95%) |
| 2046–2050 | Green identity and international model | Green building standards Participation in international green city networks | Participation in at least 3 networks (e.g., C40, GreenCity) Position in quality-of-life rankings |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2026 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.
Share and Cite
Durlak, W.; Dudkiewicz-Pietrzyk, M. Application of Acoustic Tomography in Urban Tree Risk Assessment: A Case Study from Jarocin (Poland). Sustainability 2026, 18, 5114. https://doi.org/10.3390/su18105114
Durlak W, Dudkiewicz-Pietrzyk M. Application of Acoustic Tomography in Urban Tree Risk Assessment: A Case Study from Jarocin (Poland). Sustainability. 2026; 18(10):5114. https://doi.org/10.3390/su18105114
Chicago/Turabian StyleDurlak, Wojciech, and Margot Dudkiewicz-Pietrzyk. 2026. "Application of Acoustic Tomography in Urban Tree Risk Assessment: A Case Study from Jarocin (Poland)" Sustainability 18, no. 10: 5114. https://doi.org/10.3390/su18105114
APA StyleDurlak, W., & Dudkiewicz-Pietrzyk, M. (2026). Application of Acoustic Tomography in Urban Tree Risk Assessment: A Case Study from Jarocin (Poland). Sustainability, 18(10), 5114. https://doi.org/10.3390/su18105114

