Next Article in Journal
Effects of Different Grazing Systems on Aboveground Biomass and Plant Species Dominance in Typical Chinese and Mongolian Steppes
Next Article in Special Issue
Mediating Bullying and Strain in Higher Education Institutions: The Case of Pakistan
Previous Article in Journal
Social Capital, Human Capital, and Sustainability: A Bibliometric and Visualization Analysis
Previous Article in Special Issue
Sustainable Higher Education and Technology-Enhanced Learning (TEL)
Article Menu
Issue 12 (December) cover image

Export Article

Open AccessArticle
Sustainability 2018, 10(12), 4752; https://doi.org/10.3390/su10124752

Academics’ Perceptions on Quality in Higher Education Shaping Key Performance Indicators

1
School of Business and Economics, Department of Computer Information Systems, The American College of Greece—Deree, Ag. Paraskevi Campus, Athens GR-153 42, Greece
2
Department of Computer Science, University of Alcalá, 28801-Alcalá de Henares, Madrid, Spain
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Received: 21 August 2018 / Revised: 29 November 2018 / Accepted: 10 December 2018 / Published: 13 December 2018
  |  
PDF [1196 KB, uploaded 13 December 2018]
  |  

Abstract

Institutions in higher education (HE) continuously strive to develop and deliver impactful educational programs. At the same time, they should continue to fulfill their mission to educate students in basic applied subjects and in parallel respond to the need to equip students with new skills. For this reason, higher education institutions (HEI) perform periodical curricular reviews adhering to internal and external quality assurance systems. The subsequent curricular reforms are of a transformative nature, preparing graduates to tackle the challenges of globalization, unemployment and vanishing professions. For these reforms to lead to sustainable curricula, the integration of quality into educational programs is instrumental. A suggested way of achieving a transformative stance is to provide the context for the application and diffusion of quality metrics in teaching and learning. This research intends to provide a discussion of key performance indicators (KPIs) related to quality. This paper presents the second round of qualitative interviews with higher education administrators and professors as a promising vehicle for advancing towards the formulation of KPIs based on their understanding of the different independent dimensions of the quality construct. These KPIs will provide valuable insights into improving teaching, learning and assessment and will eventually lead to sustainable curricula. Research findings outline the significance of the time invested to design and update a course, indicate that technology-enhanced learning solutions are perceived as key quality drivers, and point out the need to align courses with industry requirements and real-world problems. Additionally, findings indicate that the quality and impact of teaching and learning is promoted by the multi/inter-disciplinary character of a course, the engagement of students in interactive discussions and student research as part of summative assessment. The main contribution of this research is an analytic discussion of perceptions of higher education administrators and professors about quality, leading to a significant enrichment of the relevant literature. A set of innovative generic KPIs which can be used in multidimensional quality assessment in higher education is eventually proposed. View Full-Text
Keywords: quality; sustainable curricula; higher education; quality metrics; key performance indicators quality; sustainable curricula; higher education; quality metrics; key performance indicators
Figures

Figure 1

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited (CC BY 4.0).
SciFeed

Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Varouchas, E.; Sicilia, M.-Á.; Sánchez-Alonso, S. Academics’ Perceptions on Quality in Higher Education Shaping Key Performance Indicators. Sustainability 2018, 10, 4752.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics

1

Comments

[Return to top]
Sustainability EISSN 2071-1050 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top