Next Article in Journal
Differential Effects of Human Immunodeficiency Virus Nef Variants on Pulmonary Vascular Endothelial Cell Dysfunction
Previous Article in Journal
Canine Leptospirosis in Flood-Affected Areas of Southern Brazil: Molecular Assessment and Public Health Implications
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

A Comprehensive Review of Progress in Preventing Urinary Infections Associated with the Use of Urinary Catheters: A Dual Analysis of Publications and Patents

1
Materias Srl, Corso Nicolangelo Protopisani 50, 80146 Naples, Italy
2
Institute of Polymers, Composites and Biomaterials (IPCB), National Research Council, Piazzale Enrico Fermi 1, 80055 Portici, Italy
3
Sanidrink Srl, Corso Nicolangelo Protopisani 50, 80146 Naples, Italy
4
Department of Chemical, Materials and Production Engineering, University of Naples Federico II, Piazzale Vincenzo Tecchio, 80125 Naples, Italy
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Infect. Dis. Rep. 2025, 17(3), 64; https://doi.org/10.3390/idr17030064
Submission received: 13 March 2025 / Revised: 26 May 2025 / Accepted: 27 May 2025 / Published: 4 June 2025

Abstract

:
Catheter-associated urinary tract infections (CAUTIs), caused by microbial colonization of catheter surfaces, are among the most common healthcare-associated infections and significantly strain healthcare systems worldwide. This review aimed to provide a comprehensive analysis of the current scientific literature and the patent landscape from 2014 to 2024 on strategies for preventing CAUTIs. A systematic search was conducted using the PRISMA method, which involved searching the Scopus database for scientific evidence and analyzing patent search results on The Lens.org platform. Co-authorship and co-occurrence analysis unveiled key contributors and emerging themes within the scientific community. Simultaneously, an in-depth inspection of patents filed elucidated top origins, applicants, and classifications. Additionally, network analysis based on keywords from papers and patents revealed the scientific scenario and the innovation trends, enriching the understanding of technological advancements. It highlights emerging technologies, key actors, and potential gaps, providing valuable insights for researchers, clinicians, and industry stakeholders, thereby contributing to overcoming barriers to treating CAUTIs.

1. Introduction

Urinary catheters (UCs) are flexible tubes designed to be inserted through the urethra into patients’ bladder, allowing urine collection into a drainage bag [1]. Based on dwell time, UCs can be either intermittent (short-term) or indwelling (long-term). UCs are essential before and after specific surgeries or in case of impaired bladder function, when a safety system is required to drain, collect, and check urine. The catheter insertion process, especially for indwelling catheters, is an invasive procedure that has to be performed by specialized and trained healthcare personnel [2]. The medical and clinical staff must follow standard protocols for procedures, which involve hand washing, use of sterile gloves, and no-touch insertion methods, to ensure the asepticity of all necessary medical equipment [2]. Despite following these strict protocols, the risk of infections related to the use of catheters remains high [3]. Catheter-associated urinary tract infections (CAUTIs) occur when microorganisms colonize the catheter’s intraluminal surface or the extraluminal surface. The intraluminal colonization often results from contamination of the drainage system [4,5]. In contrast, extraluminal colonization typically occurs via bacterial migration from the urethral meatus along the external catheter surface, as described by Maki et al. [6] Both pathways provide a potential route for bacteria to enter the urinary tract, leading to infections. CAUTIs are among the most common nosocomial infections, accounting for approximately one million cases annually in both the United States and Europe. These infections and chronic wounds caused by prolonged bed rest [7] significantly burden the healthcare system [8]. Therefore, this bibliometric and patent analysis explores antimicrobial strategies for preventing CAUTIs, providing insights into both the scientific and patent landscape, according to a PRISMA method (Figure 1).
CAUTIs can cause several complications, such as orchitis, epididymitis, and prostatitis in males, whereas pyelonephritis, cystitis, and meningitis can occur independently of gender [9]. In addition to causing localized urinary tract infections, CAUTIs are a major risk factor for developing secondary bloodstream infections, including bacteremia and sepsis [10]. The progression from a localized infection to a systemic response significantly increases morbidity, mortality, and healthcare costs associated with catheter use. Like other hospital-acquired infections (HAIs), CAUTIs impose a substantial economic burden and contribute to significant mortality rates. The incidence of CAUTIs is noteworthy, contributing to increased medical complications, prolonged hospital stays, and healthcare costs [11,12,13]. Interestingly, the costs allocated for controlling and preventing HAIs are considerably lower than the expenses related to treating CAUTIs [14,15]. Among the risk factors associated with the development of CAUTIs [16,17], the duration of the catheterization [18], improper insertion or poor maintenance practices, gender differences [19,20], underlying health conditions [21], and age-related factors [22] are the most addressed. CAUTIs are caused by various microorganisms, including Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria and fungi [23,24]. The most common pathogens involved in CAUTIs are Escherichia coli, Enterococcus spp., Klebsiella pneumoniae, Staphylococcus aureus, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa, which can form a biofilm on the surfaces of UCs, contributing to persistent infections resistant to antibiotic therapy [25]. Biofilms are structured colonies of microorganisms that adhere to surfaces, forming an adhesive complex of a self-produced extracellular polymeric substance (EPS) [26]. Biofilms also act as a barrier that limits the penetration of antibiotics, contributing to antibiotic resistance [24]. Typically, the development of biofilms on catheters progresses through several distinct stages [27,28]. The initial stage involves the reversible attachment of bacteria on the catheter surface through the establishment of electrostatic or van der Waals interactions [29]. In the second stage, bacteria secure their attachment using cell adhesion structures like pili [30]. During stage three, the microorganisms start dividing and forming colonies, and cell communication occurs through quorum sensing (QS) [31]. In the fourth stage, microorganisms within the biofilm undergo phenotypic changes, adapting to the biofilm lifestyle. In the final stage, some microorganisms experience dispersion, releasing cells into the surrounding environment [32], then the dispersed cells can colonize new surfaces or contribute to infections at distant sites [32,33]. Figure 2 reports the biofilm formation stages on the UC surface.
To prevent and reduce biofilm formation on the surface of catheter tubes, various strategies have been explored, encompassing coating and releasing of bactericidal agents [34], anti-biofouling tactics [35,36], biofilm destruction [37], bacterial interference [38], and functionalization of the inner/outer surface of catheters with antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) [39,40]. Current antimicrobial strategies are schematized in Figure 3.
The use of bactericidal substances can benefit from silver coating [34], both in the form of silver oxide and silver alloy [36,41,42], for its well-known antimicrobial properties [43]. Silver-coated catheters typically release silver ions, the active agents responsible for the antimicrobial effect, into the surrounding environment [44]. Indeed, silver ions interfere with the bacterial cell membranes, enzymes, and DNA, disrupting vital cellular functions [41]. In recent times, silver nanoparticles (AgNPs) have emerged as a groundbreaking approach to enhance the antimicrobial properties of silver, due to their large surface-area-to-volume ratio, which leads to the release of more Ag+ ions than bulk silver [45]. The enhanced antimicrobial activity of Ag+ at the nanoscale has been extensively studied in medical and healthcare applications, with AgNPs incorporated into hundreds of products, including surgical and food-handling tools, as well as catheters [46]. For instance, in the work reported by Goda et al., the in vitro release of Ag+ from the surface of AgNP-covered silicon UCs allowed the inhibition of the growth of six bacteria involved in CAUTIs [47]. Exploring novel composite materials holds promise for enhancing antimicrobial effectiveness while ensuring patient safety. Particularly noteworthy are silver nanoclusters (AuNCs), which excel in enhancing antimicrobial efficacy compared to AuNPs, thanks to their ultra-small size (1–2 nm) and adaptable properties. This marks the dawn of a new era in antimicrobial advancement, with AuNCs demonstrating their superiority in eradicating bacteria such as E. coli [48].
Another approach involves antibiotic-based coatings, endowed with either bactericidal or bacteriostatic properties. The predominant antibiotic compounds employed in urinary catheters are rifampin, sparfloxacin, amoxicillin, triclosan, gentamicin, and norfloxacin [49]. For instance, in a study by Fisher et al., the impregnation of urinary catheters combing rifampicin, sparfloxacin, and triclosan deterred in vitro colonization by P. mirabilis, S. aureus, and E. coli for 7 to 12 weeks, a longer time compared to the 1–3 days showed by commercially available antimicrobial catheters used clinically [50].
Biological fouling, or biofouling, is the intricate and unwanted accumulation of bacteria on surfaces, giving rise to biofilm growth. Since fouling is predominantly influenced by surface properties, including surface chemistry, surface energy, roughness, and wettability, modifying the surface structure offers a direct approach to controlling bacteria adhesion and infection’s consequent rise and spread [51]. For instance, anti-fouling surfaces share three common features: hydrophilicity, hydrogen bond capability, and electrically neutral capability. In this context, numerous studies revealed that the ability of hydrophilic and zwitterionic surfaces to resist fouling is linked to high hydration and surface energy. Indeed, a tightly bound water layer creates a robust physical and free energy barrier, preventing adsorption [52]. This makes it difficult for microbial biofilms to form, as the surface remains slippery and less conducive to bacterial attachment. Several polymers were employed as candidates to develop hydrophilic anti-biofouling coatings. Among them, poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG), polyethyleneimine (PEI), and zwitterion-containing polymers and their derivatives were widely investigated, since they can form hydration layers via hydrogen bonding and electrostatic attraction; hence, they are particularly effective in limiting bacterial adhesion on catheter surfaces [53,54].
A further option is based on the disruption of the bacterial biofilm [37] using hydrolytic enzymes like proteases, polysaccharide hydrolases, DNases, and bacteriophage lysins [55,56], which specifically target and break down the EPS components of the biofilm matrix. Consequently, these enzymes aid in disrupting existing biofilms formed on catheter surfaces [57]. Noteworthy in this field is the use of QS inhibitors [58]. By reducing the communication process among bacteria that coordinates biofilm formation, it is possible to disrupt their ability to adhere collectively to catheter surfaces [59]. For example, the RNAIII-inhibiting peptide is a QS inhibitor that interferes with the QS process and destroys the biofilm of S. aureus and S. epidermidis [60]. In addition, nitric oxide (NO), a lipophilic gas, can diffuse through bacterial cellular membranes, exerting nitrosative and oxidative stress. NO expresses bactericidal and biofilm disruption effects without promoting drug resistance and cytotoxicity [61].
An alternative approach is bacterial interference, in which a protective coating on the surface of UCs consists of a non-pathogenic beneficial bacterial biofilm. This method effectively deters further colonization by “bad” pathogens [25]. A distinctive aspect of this bacterial interference approach lies in the dynamic nature of the anti-pathogen coating, which is living and can renew itself to sustain its anti-pathogenic activity. For instance, Chen et al. used a probiotic biofilm consisting of E. coli strain Nissle 1917 to fight the spread of infections on silicone-based UCs. In this work, the surface of polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) is first activated using CO2 plasma and then functionalized with mannosides to promote the adherence of E.coli strain Nissle 1917 [62]. The authors demonstrated the effectiveness of the bacterial interference exerted by E. Coli Nissle against the colonization by Enterococcus faecalis.
Finally, AMPs’ immobilization onto/into catheters represent one of the newest and most promising strategies to prevent biofilm formation. AMPs are short chains of aminoacidic building blocks composed of positively charged and hydrophobic residues. AMPs often exhibit a net positive charge at a physiological pH, allowing them to interact with the negatively charged microbial membranes [63]. This interaction results in the membrane’s permeabilization or disruption, causing cellular contents’ leakage and eventual cell death [39,40].
It is worth noting that in this review, the term “urinary catheters” is used to specifically refer to indwelling and intermittent urethral catheters inserted via the urethra into the bladder for urine drainage. Other types of urinary devices, such as nephrostomy tubes, ureteral stents or catheters, and urimeters, are not considered within the scope of this analysis. These devices involve distinct insertion routes, clinical indications, risk profiles, and infection mechanisms compared to urethral urinary catheters, and thus were excluded to maintain a focused and homogeneous discussion on CAUTIs.
Each of the mentioned strategies operates at distinct phases of biofilm growth, providing different effects on biofilm removal. Nevertheless, most of these strategies are still in their early stages, requiring deeper clinical evaluation to demonstrate their effectiveness. To clarify the research’s hotspots and weaknesses in the field of CAUTIs and their prevention, an in-depth investigation of the progress made so far is necessary, especially as a source of inspiration for future directions.
Along these lines, bibliometric and patent landscape analyses may provide an overview of the emerging trends in this field. Bibliometric analysis [64] provides a valuable tool for quantitatively examining the current status and trends of scientific research by considering a large volume of publications using mathematical statistics and visualization methods [65]. Analyzing publication metrics, a citation overview, and author affiliations can uncover the emerging topics, the most influential authors, and the research trends, thereby guiding strategic decision-making and resource allocation [66].
On the other hand, patent landscape analysis provides a panoramic view of technological innovation within a specific topic [67], by looking at key players, technological clusters, and commercialization pathways. Hence, patent analysis can shed light on the intellectual property landscape, highlighting the evolution of inventions, emerging technologies, and market trends [68]. Altogether, bibliometric analysis and patent landscape assessment work synergically to provide a more comprehensive understanding of the landscape of scientific progress and technological innovations [69,70,71,72].
Despite its recognized relevance, systematic bibliometric and patent analysis remains relatively underexplored. Only a few studies are currently available on patent landscapes, forecasting, and patentometry [73,74]. The proposed systematic review, based on the PRISMA methodology, focuses on bibliometric and patent landscape analyses. This study aims to map the evolution of technological innovations, identify key players, and highlight emerging strategies for preventing CAUTIs by analyzing scientific and intellectual property outputs over the past decade. In this review, we primarily focused on collecting scientific publications from 2014 to 2024, analyzing bibliometric data in terms of the number of publications per year, the most prolific authors, and countries. Similar analyses were performed for patent data, including the number of patents filed per year, most prolific applicants, countries, and top cooperative patent classification (CPC). The CPC is a worldwide spread patent classification method based on specific codes. Additionally, in both cases, a clustering analysis was performed through VOSviewer software (version 1.6.20) to develop a visual map of the co-occurrence between keywords and countries in both papers and patents. This examination assumed that papers or patents sharing similar keywords are related in some way, and these relationships can be used to identify trends in research and innovation. Based on the results outlined in this study, it will be evident that antimicrobial strategies for preventing CAUTIs represent a technological field undergoing constant evolution. To the best of our knowledge, this is one of the first systematic reviews to combine bibliometric and patent landscape analyses specifically addressing technological innovation for the prevention of CAUTIs. Our findings aim to support decision-makers, clinicians, innovation managers, and researchers by providing a comprehensive overview of the technological maturity, emerging trends, and innovation dynamics within this field. Overall, this review offers valuable insights for individuals involved in patent management, innovation strategy, research leadership, and clinical implementation, helping to guide future developments and the implementation of effective solutions for CAUTI prevention.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Bibliometric Database Collection and Analysis

Bibliometric data collection from scientific literature was conducted by searching the Scopus database on a specific date (15 January 2025). By applying these search criteria to the Scopus Database, the following query was obtained: (TITLE-ABS-KEY (catheter*) AND TITLE-ABS-KEY (urina*) AND TITLE-ABS-KEY (antimicrobi*)) AND PUBYEAR > 2013 AND PUBYEAR < 2025 AND (LIMIT-TO (DOCTYPE, “ar”) OR LIMIT-TO (DOCTYPE, “re”). This search retrieved 1506 documents worldwide. Scopus is a comprehensive scientific database of abstracts and citations covering many different academic disciplines. Developed by Elsevier, Scopus is designed to facilitate scholarly research, providing access to a large collection of scientific literature and citation information. Scopus offers API (application programming interface) access, allowing the integration of Scopus data for customized analyses and data retrieval. This bibliometric review follows the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) flowchart [75]. Title, journal, all author names, month and year of publication, institution, and total number of citations were collected from each publication. Then, output analysis was carried out with Excel® tools, while graphical representations of the retrieved data were obtained using Biorender. Co-authorship and co-occurrence analyses were accomplished using VOSviewer software. VOSviewer is a freely available software developed by Leiden University in the Netherlands, widely used in bibliometric studies [76,77] to identify co-author relationships, keyword co-occurrences, and co-citations, allowing the construction and visualization of bibliometric networks [78]. VOSviewer software offers three main types of maps: network visualization, overlay visualization, and density visualization. Particularly noteworthy are the network visualization and density visualization maps, which make VOSviewer an outstanding tool for mapping scientific knowledge [79]. The graphical representations of the map consist of interconnected nodes and links, where nodes symbolize specific entities such as nations, organizations, authors, and terms. The size of the nodes corresponds to their numerical frequency, while the connections between nodes denote their relationships. This visualization approach provides a clear and intuitive representation of the relationships between terms and entities within the analyzed scientific literature, facilitating the identification of key concepts, trends, and research areas.

2.2. Patent Database Collection and Analysis

A systematic patent search and collection was carried out employing lens.org™ (www.lens.org (accessed on 15 January 2024)), a free and open patent database and scholarly search platform that accesses Espacenet, the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO), the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO), and Australian patent databases, providing a broad spectrum of information retrieval. On 15 January 2024, the lens.org™ database was accessed and the following search string was entered in the query text editor: (title:(catheter*) OR abstract:(catheter*) OR claim:(catheter*)) AND (title:(urina*) OR abstract:(urina*) OR claim:(urina*)) AND (title: (antimicrobi*) OR abstract: (antimicrobi*) OR claim: (antimicrobi*). The patent search was limited to patents filed between 1 January 2014 and 31 December 2024. Similarly to the bibliometric data collection, the PRISMA method was used for the patent review process. The top countries, top applicants, and classifications were examined. In addition, a network analysis based on keyword occurrence in patents was performed. Output analysis was conducted using Excel® (Microsoft 365, Microsoft Corporation, Redmond, WA, USA) tools, graphical representations of the retrieved data were obtained by Biorender software (BioRender, Toronto, ON, Canada), and the network co-occurrence analysis was performed by VOS viewer software (version 1.6.20, Centre for Science and Technology Studies, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands).

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Bibliometric Data Analysis

The final scoping review corpus included a total of 1506 documents. Figure 1A illustrates the flow chart based on the PRISMA method for data collection from the Scopus database. A complete analysis was conducted once all the publications were identified based on the eligibility criteria. Three keywords were used to interrogate the Scopus database: (1) catheter*; (2) urina*; (3) antimicrobi*. The initial search showed 2841 documents published from 1962 to 2024. After limiting the document types to English reviews and articles, 458 documents were removed from the database. Moreover, by restricting the research to the range between 2014 and 2024, 877 documents were deleted from the database. Table 1 and Figure 4 show the annual distribution of publications on strategies to prevent CAUTIs over the study period. The publication output expanded from 94 in 2014 to 199 in 2024. Out of a total of 1506 publications, 199 (13.21%) were recorded mainly in the year 2024, whereas 154 publications (11.42%) were published in 2022. The minimum number of publications was recorded in the early years (2014–2015).
The annual growth rate (AGR) was calculated using the formula reported by Kumar and Kaliyaperumal [80]. Table 1 reports the maximum AGR at 29.47% in 2016, followed by 29.22% in 2024. The growth in scientific production during the years 2020–2022 can surely be attributed to the global pandemic, which significantly increased hospitalizations, leading to an increase in hospital-related infections, such as urinary ones [81].

3.2. Predominant Journals, Highest Cited Articles, and Main Thematic Areas

Table 2 displays the top 10 journals that contribute significantly to the field of CAUTIs and their prevention. The most prolific journals are Antibiotics with 47 publications, followed by BMC Infectious Diseases, which has published 30 articles, and Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology with 27 articles. The latter is also the most cited source, with 1930 citations.
Citation count is a key indicator of the importance of scientific papers, offering a quantitative measure of their impact within the scientific community [82]. For this reason, Table 3 highlights the most cited articles addressing CAUTIs and their prevention, indicating the journal and the year of publication. At the top of this list is “Staphylococcus aureus infections: epidemiology, pathophysiology, clinical manifestations, and management” with 2929 citations. The following is “Antimicrobial-Resistant Pathogens Associated with Healthcare-Associated Infections: Summary of Data Reported to the National Healthcare Safety Network at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention”, with a total of 841 citations. Rounding out the top three is “Healthcare-Associated Infections, Medical Devices, and Biofilms: Risk, Tolerance, and Control” with 497 citations.
The principal thematic area significantly impacted by CAUTIs and their prevention is the medical field, comprising 1153 publications, an expected outcome as these infections are closely associated with hospitalization and the healthcare sector [93], as well as UTI-related diseases [33] and the establishment of clinical practice guidelines to manage infections [94]. Additionally, the areas of immunology and microbiology, with 275 papers, represent another closely related domain since CAUTIs are primarily caused by microbial pathogens entering the urinary tract [28,87]. Microbiological studies are crucial in identifying the pathogens responsible for CAUTIs and their underlying antibiotic susceptibility profiles [95,96,97], and understanding the mechanisms of pathogenicity [98,99]. Biochemistry, genetics, and molecular biology follow in the rankings with 205 publications. All the data about the top 10 thematic areas impacted by CAUTIs and their prevention are fully listed in Table 4.

3.3. Funding Sponsors and Geographical Distribution of Academic Publications

Table 5 displays the top 10 funding sponsors of academic publishers, including government agencies, research centres, and companies. The US has played a substantial role in promoting advancements in scientific research about CAUTIs and their prevention, providing most of the economic support via the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. In China, funding is provided by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC). At the same time, in the European Union, support is mostly derived from the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) and European Commission.
This trend is consistent among the most prolific countries. Indeed, as depicted in red in Figure 5, the United States is the most prolific world area, with 383 publications.
India and the United Kingdom have to their credit 136 and 122 publications, respectively. China follows with 82 publications and Spain with 76 articles, then Italy and Japan with 76 and 75 publications, respectively. At the end of the list, there are Canada, Turkey, and Germany with 49, 47, and 43 publications, respectively. It should be noted that the absolute number of publications is influenced by the size of the country’s population, its research funding capacity, and scientific infrastructure. Countries with significant populations and resources—such as the United States, China, and India—typically produce more scientific outputs. Therefore, comparisons without normalization by factors such as population size or research expenditure may overestimate the relative contribution of larger countries compared to smaller, yet highly research-active, nations.

3.4. Co-Authorship of Countries and Authors

Co-authorship of scientific publications among countries, reflecting the advances of researchers from different parts of the world [100], was analyzed using VOSviewer software. A bibliometric network map was generated from the analysis of the input file in VOSviewer. The graphical representations of the map consist of interconnected nodes and links. The size of the nodes corresponds to their numerical frequency, while the connections between nodes denote their relationships. The network map in Figure 6 displays the connections of the international collaborations of 115 countries on CAUTIs and their prevention.

3.5. Co-Occurrence Analysis of the Top Keywords in the Recovered Articles

A total of 1506 documents retrieved from the Scopus database were used to build the keywords network. In a scientific paper, keywords encapsulate the essence of the research and aid in indexing and categorizing articles, enhancing overall impact and detectability [101,102]. Authors strategically select keywords to align their work with specific themes, increasing the chance of the publication being read and cited. Network maps based on keywords investigate the connections among research topics and help to express their evolution over time. In this review, VOSviewer was used to extract and cluster the 2813 keywords from the 1506 retrieved publications. Figure 7 displays the network visualization map of the co-occurrence analysis of the keywords on strategies to prevent CAUTIs. Larger circles indicate a higher frequency in the co-occurrence analysis, and the color of each circle is determined by the cluster they belong to. The closer two keywords are located to each other, the stronger their relatedness. From the co-occurrence analysis of the keywords, five main clusters were obtained, displayed in red (cluster 1), green (cluster 2), blue (cluster 3), yellow (cluster 4), and violet (cluster 5). The top 50 keywords combined in the five clusters are listed in Table 6.
Cluster 1: Biofilm formation and anti-biofilm strategies
Keywords belonging to cluster 1 converge around biofilm formation and the corresponding antimicrobial strategies to manage them. This cluster displays the pathogens involved in biofilm formation, such as Escherichia coli, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Proteus mirabilis, Staphylococcus aureus, and Enterococcus faecalis, contributing to persistent infections and antibiotic resistance. In this framework, Gaston et al. demonstrated that Enterococcus faecalis and Proteus mirabilis are prevalent and persistent co-colonizers on the surfaces of urinary catheters. Indeed, E. faecalis acts as a pioneer species on UCs, fostering persistent colonization by traditional pathogens such as P. mirabilis, facilitating a robust biofilm architecture, and enhancing the antimicrobial resistance for both species [103]. The use of keywords like “antimicrobial peptides” [40] and “coatings” [90], along with “silver nanoparticles” [104], stands for their efficacy in preventing biofilm formation and controlling bacterial growth. The emergence of multidrug-resistant organisms like Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) [105] highlights the urgency of developing novel antibacterial agents and antimicrobial surfaces. Additionally, cluster 1 collects keywords about research on quorum sensing mechanisms [106] and biocompatible biomaterials that improve catheter biocompatibility [107]. Overall, this cluster reflects the multidisciplinary approach required to address the complex challenges posed by UTIs and their multifaceted nature and provides evolving strategies for their prevention and treatment.
Cluster 2: CAUTIs and their management
Cluster 2 collects keywords interconnected through their association with CAUTIs and the strategies to fight them [108], and collectively represents various aspects of infection prevention, diagnosis, and management, particularly in healthcare settings. For instance, Saini et al. developed a biomaterial modification by impregnating a silicone urinary catheter with a combination of antimicrobial substances like macrolide, azithromycin, and ciprofloxacin. The drug release profiles showed continuous release of antibiotics from catheters for about a month, leading to a long antimicrobial effect [109]. Keywords like “antibiotic susceptibility” and “antimicrobial susceptibility” shed light on the importance of assessing microbial sensitivity to specific medications to inform treatment decisions [110]. Topics such as “bacteraemia”, “CAUTIs”, and “central line-associated bloodstream infection” indicate the types of infections commonly encountered in healthcare settings [111], especially among patients in critical or intensive care units. The inclusion of “COVID-19” and “SARS-CoV-2” underscores the relevance of infectious disease management, mostly in the context of emerging infectious diseases [112].
Cluster 3: UTI diagnosis, prevention, and treatment
Cluster 3 is mainly formed by keywords interconnected through the specific types of UTIs and their antimicrobial management. Specifically, these keywords form a network representing various aspects of UTI diagnosis, treatment, and prevention. Terms like “cystitis”, “prostatitis”, and “pyelonephritis” represent specific types of UTIs, each requiring targeted treatment strategies [113,114]. Ensuring responsible management and preventative actions is crucial, especially in long-term care facilities and nursing homes, where UTIs are common [115]. Further, in an emergency scenario, prompt diagnosis and treatment of UTIs are critical to mitigate complications like bloodstream infections. Extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL)-producing organisms pose challenges in UTI management, requiring careful antibiotic selection and stewardship initiatives. As described by Fujino et al. [113], acute cystitis caused by ESBL-producing E. coli can be treated with faropenem compounds, showing promising results.
Cluster 4: Healthcare-associated infections
Cluster 4 is related to healthcare-associated infections (HCAI), responsible antibiotic use, and antimicrobial resistance monitoring. Implementing infection prevention and control measures, such as surveillance and antibiotic stewardship programs [116,117], plays a crucial role in reducing the spread of resistant pathogens and hindering infections. Point prevalence surveys are conducted to assess the incidence of healthcare-associated infections, providing valuable data for infection control programs. In this regard, Chen et al. reported a point-prevalence survey of 52 hospitals in China and found that among 53,939 patients surveyed, the prevalence of patients with at least one HCAI was 3.7%, a lower percentage compared to the USA and Europe [118].
Cluster 5: Antibiotic resistance
Finally, Cluster 5 focuses on strategies to prevent antibiotic resistance. Acinetobacter baumannii and Klebsiella pneumoniae are well-known for their propensity to develop resistance, particularly against carbapenem antibiotics, leading to the emergence of carbapenem-resistant strains [119]. Fluoroquinolones and fosfomycin, commonly used antibiotics for treating Gram-negative bacterial infections, may encounter compromised effectiveness due to the development of drug resistance [120]. MRSA, although a Gram-positive bacterium, is also included due to its relevance in healthcare settings and its association with increased mortality [121].
Figure 8 illustrates the overlay visualization of the co-occurrence analysis of the top keywords, a valid tool for uncovering new trends, and mapping collaboration in the academic environment and knowledge flow. It also enables the classification of items based on the timescale. The items are color-coded according to the year of publication, with more recent terms appearing in yellow and older ones in blue. Our findings indicate that recent terms are particularly associated with antibiotic resistance and stewardship. Antimicrobial resistance poses a significant public health challenge, as drug-resistant microbes substantially contribute to morbidity and mortality in hospitals, especially in critical care units [122].

3.6. Patent Database Analysis

Figure 1B shows the patent review process by using the PRISMA method. The total number of recovered patents consists of 368 documents grouped into 181 families. The trends in patents related to antimicrobial strategies to prevent CAUTIs were analyzed using the retrieved The Lens database within the timeframe of 2014–2024.
Figure 9 depicts the patent trends and the document type during the mentioned period, with a percentage of 77% filed patents and 22% granted patents. An almost steady pattern of patent applications is evident over the years. However, it is worth noting that the patent publication process typically takes around 18 months from the filing date. According to this, the number of applications in the final year and a half of the analyzed period (2023–2024) might be underestimated.

3.7. Top 10 Patent Applicants

Recovered The Lens database identified 115 distinct applicants, with the top 10 listed in Table 7. Interestingly, except for the Swiss company Polyphor AG and the Italian Alps South, the other applicants were all from US universities and companies. In particular, the University of Texas and Polyphor AG (now SPEXIS) were the most prolific applicants in the field of CAUTIs. According to a ranking list published by the National Academy of Inventors (NAI), the University of Texas secured the third position among the top 100 US universities with granted patents in 2022. Polyphor AG is a specialist in the development of new antibiotics and drugs for the treatment of infectious, oncological, and respiratory diseases. One of the most well-known molecules developed by Polyphor is murepavadin (POL7080), a polymyxin-class antibiotic under development for severe and multidrug-resistant infections caused by Gram-negative bacteria, including Pseudomonas aeruginosa. From the retrieved patent database, it emerged that Polyphor AG patented peptidomimetics with antimicrobial activity, especially against Gram-negative bacteria. Bard, ranked third among applicants, is a prominent American medical device company renowned for its innovations in urology, vascular, oncology, and surgical specialty products. Tepha Medical Device, ranked fourth, specializes in the development and manufacturing of medical devices and implants made from poly-4-hydroxybutyrate (P4HB), a biomaterial derived from microbial fermentation processes. Both companies were acquired by BD (Becton, Dickinson and Company), with Bard acquired in 2017 and Tepha in 2021, further strengthening BD’s portfolio in the medical device sector.
Tracking patent citation trends can be extremely helpful in identifying which companies are engaged in active development, understanding the direction of a specific technology or field, and assessing the state of the art within a specific technological area. Patents with high citation indexes are more prone to be licensed or sold at a higher price, as they are seen as more innovative and influential in their field.
Regarding our retrieved database from The Lens, the document US 2019/0375149 A1 “Methods for 3D Printing of Poly-4-Hydroxybutyrate and Copolymers” [123], with 43 citations, was the most cited in other patents. This patent, filed in 2019 and owned by Tepha Medical Device, delineates a method to 3D-print poly-4-hydroxybutyrate (P4HB) and its copolymers. These materials, individually or in combination, can fabricate a medical implant optionally coated with a bioactive agent like antimicrobial peptides or antibiotic compounds.
In the classification of countries where patents addressing strategies to prevent CAUTIs are filed or granted, the US claims the top spot with 206 documents, followed by WIPO with 124 and Europe with 21 patents. Nevertheless, since the WIPO application is related to an undefined place for protection, these outcomes were omitted from the analysis of the potential markets for technology exploitation.
About the Cooperative Patent Classification, the retrieved results show that most of the patents were in the CPC category A61L, concerning “methods or apparatus for sterilizing materials or objects in general disinfection, sterilization or deodorization of air chemical aspects of bandages, dressings, absorbent pads or surgical articles materials for bandages, dressings, absorbent pads or surgical articles”. These CPCs adequately describe the retrieved patent database. The CPC code A61P31/04, referring to antibacterial agents, has the highest number of recorded patents with 124 documents. Next, A61L2300/404, about biocides, antimicrobial agents, and antiseptic agents, brings together 123 documents, whereas A61L29/16, indicating biologically active materials has 119 documents.

3.8. Co-Occurrence Analysis of the Top Keywords of the Recovered Patents

The correlation of keywords within the recovered patents was evaluated considering the frequency of their occurrence in both titles and abstracts. This analysis was performed with VOSviewer by selecting all the recovered patents, counting in binary mode, and including a minimum number of occurrences of a term equal to 3. The total strength of the co-occurrence links with other keywords was calculated for each keyword. Figure 10 shows the network visualization map of the co-occurrence analysis of the patents’ keywords on strategies to prevent CAUTIs. Larger circles indicate a higher frequency in the co-occurrence analysis, and the color of each circle is determined by the cluster they belong to. The closer two keywords are located to each other, the stronger their relatedness.
The overlay visualization, shown in Figure 11, differs from the network view in that it uses differently colored keywords. The color of a keyword refers to the patent application date which contains it. The range of colors goes from blue, representing older patents, to green and yellow, indicating newer ones. In the overlay visualization, the latest yellow-colored patents, for example, are related to the area of hydrophilic polymer-based anti-biofouling coatings.
Starting with the co-occurrence analysis of the keywords, five main clusters were obtained, displayed in red (cluster 1), green (cluster 2), blue (cluster 3), yellow (cluster 4), and violet (cluster 5). The top 40 keywords combined in the five clusters are listed in Table 8. Figure 11 shows the network visualization map of the co-occurrence analysis of the patents’ keywords in strategies to prevent CAUTIs. Larger circles indicate a higher frequency in the co-occurrence analysis, and the color of each circle is determined by the cluster they belong to. The closer two keywords are located to each other, the stronger their relatedness.
Cluster 1: Integrated antimicrobial coatings for urinary catheters
Cluster 1, in red, includes keywords related to specific technologies and approaches for targeted medical devices development to prevent and treat CAUTIs. Patents belonging to this cluster focus on urinary catheters with integrated antimicrobial properties and coatings. Indeed, keywords such as “antimicrobial coating”, “hydrophilic coating”, and “bacterial strain” suggest a reference to the coating used on the “surface” of the “urinary catheter” to inhibit microbial growth. The term “biofouling” indicates awareness about biofilm formation on device surfaces, like urinary catheters, which can contribute to urinary tract infections. Simultaneously, terms like “delivery,” “fluid,” “polymer”, and “substrate” imply the consideration of medical device design and functionality, including urinary catheters, ensuring effective fluid delivery and good biocompatibility with urinary tissue. Additionally, the mention of “bladder”, “urinary catheter”, “urinary tract infection”, and “urine” indicates specific attention to the urinary tract and associated infections.
Cluster 2: Antimicrobial formulations against uropathogen
Cluster 2, in green, is oriented toward specific microorganisms such as “Gram-negative bacteria”. Keywords like “Escherichia coli”, “Acinetobacter baumannii”, and “Klebsiella Pneumoniae”, focus on the specific uropathogen, whereas “antimicrobial peptide”, “peptide”, and “formulation” refer to the peptide molecules that have demonstrated their efficacy against a wide range of microorganisms, including those aforementioned. The term “disinfectant” is interconnected with substances used to destroy or inactivate microorganisms on non-living surfaces, including those in healthcare environments. Lastly, “acceptable salt” could denote salts used as excipients or stabilizers in formulations of antimicrobial or disinfectant products.
Cluster 3: Specialized coatings to enhance catheters’ functionality
Patents belonging to cluster 3, in blue, include keywords linked through their relevance to urinary tract interventions and medical device functionality. “Lubricant” suggests the use of substances to reduce friction during device insertion or movement. “Negative pressure” may relate to mechanisms involved in fluid drainage or management within the urinary tract. The concept of “protective surface area” likely relates to design features aimed at minimizing tissue damage and optimizing device functionality. “Urinary stent device” and “coating” indicate a great effort toward developing and enhancing medical devices used in the urinary tract, potentially with specialized surface coatings to enhance biocompatibility and antimicrobial properties. “Port” could refer to openings or access points in devices for fluid drainage or administration. “Urinary tract” denotes the anatomical site and biological structures involved in urinary system interventions, highlighting the importance of device design and functionality in maintaining tissue health and preventing complications.
Cluster 4: Innovative Antibacterial Treatments
Keywords in cluster 4, represented in yellow, are interconnected through their relevance to medical treatments and interventions, particularly in combating bacterial infections and diseases. “Cytotoxicity” relates to potential toxicity and harmful effects of certain substances on cells. “Parallel library” suggests the use of high-throughput screening methods for the development of novel treatments or interventions. “Therapeutic use” indicates the application of medical treatments for therapeutic purposes. “Antibacterial agent” and “antibiotic” refer to substances used to target and kill bacteria, while “phage therapy” involves the use of bacteriophages to counteract bacterial infections. “Bacterial infection” and “disease” highlight the target conditions for these treatments, emphasizing the need for effective antibacterial interventions to manage and treat infectious diseases.
Cluster 5: Implantable device to enhance efficacy and safety
Cluster 5, highlighted in violet, contains words related to medical devices, materials, and treatments. “Implantable device” and “tube” refer to medical devices designed to be placed inside the body for therapeutic or diagnostic purposes. “Embodiment” suggests different variations or forms of a particular design or concept, often referring to specific configurations or implementations of implantable devices. “P4HB” and “hydroxybutyrate” denote a biodegradable polymer used in the manufacture of medical devices. “Minocycline” is an antibiotic commonly used to prevent bacterial infection in medical devices. “EDTA” or ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid is a chelating agent used to prevent the formation of biofilms or mineral deposits on implantable devices. These terms collectively highlight different aspects of implantable device technology, materials, and treatments aimed at enhancing efficacy and safety.
Two main topics emerge from the analysis of patents resulting from the database query. The first one centers on urinary catheters with integrated antimicrobial properties, while the second one revolves around antimicrobial and antibacterial technologies development, particularly involving antimicrobial peptides and novel formulations. The first topic highlights the efforts to enhance catheter designs to prevent microbial colonization and infection, often through antimicrobial agents incorporated directly into the catheter material. Conversely, the second theme concerns the exploration of novel antimicrobial agents, formulations, and delivery methods, especially antimicrobial peptides, a promising technology with powerful antimicrobial activity against a wide range of pathogens. These findings emphasize the dual approach to tackling catheter-related infections: improving the intrinsic antimicrobial properties of catheter materials and progressing in the development of novel antimicrobial technologies with wider therapeutic use to counteract antibiotic resistance. Accordingly, Table 9 and Table 10 collecting the most cited patents referring to urinary catheters and devices with integrated antimicrobial features, report the principal antimicrobial technologies involved in the management and treatment of infectious disease, respectively. The tables include information on active patent applications, application number, application date, titles, owners, and a short description.

4. Conclusions

CAUTIs have emerged as one of the most widespread healthcare-associated infections, placing a substantial burden on the healthcare system and contributing to millions of cases every year. The prevention of CAUTIs is imperative to limit secondary bloodstream infections, and rates of antibiotic resistance and alleviate hospital costs. Therefore, this bibliometric and patent analysis delves into antimicrobial strategies for preventing CAUTIs, encompassing the scientific and patent landscape. Efforts have been made to minimize selection bias by using a systematic and reproducible search strategy in Scopus for bibliometric data and in The Lens for patent analysis. In addition, data extraction was conducted using predefined inclusion criteria, and visualization tools such as VOSviewer were used to ensure objectivity in identifying research trends and technological advances. Novel preventive strategies span catheter coatings, materials, and bacterial interference, leveraging nonvirulent strains to outcompete pathogens. At the same time, innovative alternatives have been developed without inducing antibiotic resistance. Nonetheless, most novel strategies lack clinical validation, necessitating further investigation. The publication output (bibliometric analysis) increased notably over the defined timeframe (2014–2024), reflecting a growing interest in addressing the challenges posed by CAUTIs. By analyzing the top cited articles and authors, the main research topics identified were antimicrobial resistance, healthcare-associated infections, and biofilm-related diseases. The geographical distribution of scholarly contributions identified the United States as the most productive country in this field. The thematic analysis revealed the multidisciplinary nature of research on CAUTIs, with medicine and immunology having the highest number of publications. This reflects the multifaceted challenges of CAUTIs and emphasizes the need for combined approaches. Furthermore, the co-authorship network of countries shows the importance of international collaboration in advancing research on CAUTIs, with the United States playing a central role. The co-occurrence analysis of keywords also unveils emerging research trends and thematic clusters, including biofilm formation, infection management strategies, antibiotic resistance, and healthcare-associated infections.
Turning to the patent database analysis in the marked period, a consistent trend in patent applications was observed over the years. The United States is the preferred place to apply for patents and a primary source of antibiofilm technology development. Trends in catheter design, featuring enhanced and integrated antimicrobial properties, and novel antimicrobial agents, particularly antimicrobial peptides, highlight ongoing efforts to counteract antibiotic resistance. From the bibliometric and patent analyses, the convergence of scientific and technological innovation reveals distinct yet complementary trends. While scientific research focuses on the design of new compounds oriented to solve the problem of multidrug resistance, patents are mostly focused on practical applications and product development. Collaboration among universities, pharmaceutical companies, and medical device manufacturers will be crucial in accelerating innovation and bringing effective CAUTIs prevention technologies to the market. Indeed, scientific reports will continue to guide technological developments, patents will acquire inspiration from prior results described in the articles, and an in-depth analysis of the technological landscape will pave the way to commercially acceptable products. In conclusion, to fight CAUTIs, researchers are directing their efforts to exploring advanced antimicrobial coatings, biofilm disruption strategies, and the development of novel antimicrobial agents. This involves supporting multidisciplinary research that integrates microbiology, materials science, and clinical studies. On the patent front, inventors and applicants are investing in innovative catheter design and antimicrobial technologies. Policies that encourage collaboration between academic institutions and industry can accelerate the development and commercialization of new products. Additionally, investing in the refinement of antimicrobial delivery systems and integrated antimicrobial features in medical devices will be crucial. By aligning funding and resources with these trends, policymakers can drive significant advancements in CAUTI prevention, ultimately improving patient outcomes and reducing healthcare costs.

Author Contributions

B.C. performed bibliometric analysis and cluster analysis. A.C. (Aniello Cammarano) performed patent landscaping and patent analysis. S.D.I., L.A., E.R., A.C. (Annunziata Cummaro), M.E.M. and R.M. contributed to revising the bibliometric, patent, and cluster analysis. S.D.I., L.N., C.M. and A.C. (Aniello Cammarano) contributed to conceptualization. All the authors contributed to the original draft and revised the original manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data available on request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Feneley, R.C.L.; Hopley, I.B.; Wells, P.N.T. Urinary Catheters: History, Current Status, Adverse Events and Research Agenda. J. Med. Eng. Technol. 2015, 39, 459–470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Falkiner, F. The Insertion and Management of Indwelling Urethral Catheters—Minimizing the Risk of Infection. J. Hosp. Infect. 1993, 25, 79–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Mathur, P. Hand Hygiene: Back to the Basics of Infection Control. Indian J. Med. Res. 2011, 134, 611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Abram, M.; Magaš, M.; Škrobonja, I.; Barać, N. Catheter associated urinary tract infections—Targeting zero infections. Med. Flum. 2020, 56, 444–451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Maharjan, G.; Khadka, P.; Siddhi Shilpakar, G.; Chapagain, G.; Dhungana, G.R. Catheter-Associated Urinary Tract Infection and Obstinate Biofilm Producers. Can. J. Infect. Dis. Med. Microbiol. 2018, 2018, 7624857. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Maki, D.G.; Tambyah, P.A. Engineering out the Risk of Infection with Urinary Catheters. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2001, 7, 342–347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Serpico, L.; Dello Iacono, S.; De Stefano, L.; De Martino, S.; Battisti, M.; Dardano, P.; Pedatella, S.; De Nisco, M. pH-Sensitive Release of Antioxidant Se-Glycoconjugates through a Flexible Polymeric Patch. Eur. Polym. J. 2022, 178, 111486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Alrebish, S.A.; Yusufoglu, H.S.; Alotibi, R.F.; Abdulkhalik, N.S.; Ahmed, N.J.; Khan, A.H. Epidemiology of Healthcare-Associated Infections and Adherence to the HAI Prevention Strategies. Healthcare 2022, 11, 63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Baenas, D.F.; Saad, E.J.; Diehl, F.A.; Musso, D.; González, J.G.; Russo, V.; Vilaró, M.; Albertini, R.A. Nosocomial urinary tract infection: An analysis beyond urinary catheterization. Rev. Chil. Infectol. 2018, 35, 246–252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Melzer, M.; Welch, C. Does the Presence of a Urinary Catheter Predict Severe Sepsis in a Bacteraemic Cohort? J. Hosp. Infect. 2017, 95, 376–382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Mitchell, B.G.; Ferguson, J.K.; Anderson, M.; Sear, J.; Barnett, A. Length of Stay and Mortality Associated with Healthcare-Associated Urinary Tract Infections: A Multi-State Model. J. Hosp. Infect. 2016, 93, 92–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Mody, L.; Meddings, J.; Edson, B.S.; McNamara, S.E.; Trautner, B.W.; Stone, N.D.; Krein, S.L.; Saint, S.; Perl, T.M. Enhancing Resident Safety by Preventing Healthcare-Associated Infection: A National Initiative to Reduce Catheter-Associated Urinary Tract Infections in Nursing Homes. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2015, 61, 86–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Rubi, H.; Mudey, G.; Kunjalwar, R. Catheter-Associated Urinary Tract Infection (CAUTI). Cureus 2022, 14, e30385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Clarke, K.; Hall, C.L.; Wiley, Z.; Chernetsky Tejedor, S.; Kim, J.S.; Reif, L.; Witt, L.; Jacob, J.T. Catheter-Associated Urinary Tract Infections in Adults: Diagnosis, Treatment, and Prevention. J. Hosp. Med. 2020, 15, 552–556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Alothman, A.; Al Thaqafi, A.; Al Ansary, A.; Zikri, A.; Fayed, A.; Khamis, F.; Al Salman, J.; Al Dabal, L.; Khalife, N.; AlMusawi, T.; et al. Prevalence of Infections and Antimicrobial Use in the Acute-Care Hospital Setting in the Middle East: Results from the First Point-Prevalence Survey in the Region. Int. J. Infect. Dis. 2020, 101, 249–258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Chen, W.; Xiang, S.; Cao, Y. Risk factors and pathogen distribution of urinary tract infection after ureteral stenting in urological patients. Chin. J. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2019, 12, 344–349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Letica-Kriegel, A.S.; Salmasian, H.; Vawdrey, D.K.; Youngerman, B.E.; Green, R.A.; Furuya, E.Y.; Calfee, D.P.; Perotte, R. Identifying the Risk Factors for Catheter-Associated Urinary Tract Infections: A Large Cross-Sectional Study of Six Hospitals. BMJ Open 2019, 9, e022137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. AL-Hazmi, H. Role of Duration of Catheterization and Length of Hospital Stay on the Rate of Catheter-Related Hospital-Acquired Urinary Tract Infections. RRU 2015, 7, 41–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Storme, O.; Saucedo, J.T.; Garcia-Mora, A.; Dehesa-Dávila, M.; Naber, K.G. Risk Factors and Predisposing Conditions for Urinary Tract Infection. Ther. Adv. Urol. 2019, 11, 19–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Lee, D.S.; Choe, H.-S.; Kim, H.Y.; Yoo, J.M.; Bae, W.J.; Cho, Y.H.; Kim, S.W.; Han, C.H.; Bae, S.R.; Jang, H.; et al. Role of Age and Sex in Determining Antibiotic Resistance in Febrile Urinary Tract Infections. Int. J. Infect. Dis. 2016, 51, 89–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Armbruster, C.E.; Brauer, A.L.; Humby, M.S.; Shao, J.; Chakraborty, S. Prospective Assessment of Catheter-Associated Bacteriuria Clinical Presentation, Epidemiology, and Colonization Dynamics in Nursing Home Residents. JCI Insight 2021, 6, e144775. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Öztürk, R.; Murt, A. Epidemiology of Urological Infections: A Global Burden. World J. Urol. 2020, 38, 2669–2679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Townsend, E.M.; Moat, J.; Jameson, E. CAUTI’s next Top Model—Model Dependent Klebsiella Biofilm Inhibition by Bacteriophages and Antimicrobials. Biofilm 2020, 2, 100038. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Delcaru, C.; Alexandru, I.; Podgoreanu, P.; Grosu, M.; Stavropoulos, E.; Chifiriuc, M.C.; Lazar, V. Microbial Biofilms in Urinary Tract Infections and Prostatitis: Etiology, Pathogenicity, and Combating Strategies. Pathogens 2016, 5, 65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Navarro, S.; Sherman, E.; Colmer-Hamood, J.A.; Nelius, T.; Myntti, M.; Hamood, A.N. Urinary Catheters Coated with a Novel Biofilm Preventative Agent Inhibit Biofilm Development by Diverse Bacterial Uropathogens. Antibiotics 2022, 11, 1514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Singh, S.; Datta, S.; Narayanan, K.B.; Rajnish, K.N. Bacterial Exo-Polysaccharides in Biofilms: Role in Antimicrobial Resistance and Treatments. J. Genet. Eng. Biotechnol. 2021, 19, 140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Zhao, A.; Sun, J.; Liu, Y. Understanding Bacterial Biofilms: From Definition to Treatment Strategies. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2023, 13, 1137947. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Wi, Y.M.; Patel, R. Understanding Biofilms and Novel Approaches to the Diagnosis, Prevention, and Treatment of Medical Device-Associated Infections. Infect. Dis. Clin. North. Am. 2018, 32, 915–929. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Ch’ng, J.-H.; Chong, K.K.L.; Lam, L.N.; Wong, J.J.; Kline, K.A. Biofilm-Associated Infection by Enterococci. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2019, 17, 82–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Kreve, S.; Reis, A.C.D. Bacterial Adhesion to Biomaterials: What Regulates This Attachment? A Review. Jpn. Dent. Sci. Rev. 2021, 57, 85–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Sauer, K.; Stoodley, P.; Goeres, D.M.; Hall-Stoodley, L.; Burmølle, M.; Stewart, P.S.; Bjarnsholt, T. The Biofilm Life Cycle: Expanding the Conceptual Model of Biofilm Formation. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2022, 20, 608–620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Rumbaugh, K.P.; Sauer, K. Biofilm Dispersion. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2020, 18, 571–586. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Sharma, S.; Mohler, J.; Mahajan, S.D.; Schwartz, S.A.; Bruggemann, L.; Aalinkeel, R. Microbial Biofilm: A Review on Formation, Infection, Antibiotic Resistance, Control Measures, and Innovative Treatment. Microorganisms 2023, 11, 1614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Huang, Z.; Zhang, D.; Gu, Q.; Miao, J.; Cen, X.; Golodok, R.P.; Savich, V.V.; Ilyushchenko, A.P.; Zhou, Z.; Wang, R. One-Step Coordination of Metal-Phenolic Networks as Antibacterial Coatings with Sustainable and Controllable Copper Release for Urinary Catheter Applications. RSC Adv. 2022, 12, 15685–15693. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Alves, D.; Vaz, A.T.; Grainha, T.; Rodrigues, C.F.; Pereira, M.O. Design of an Antifungal Surface Embedding Liposomal Amphotericin B through a Mussel Adhesive-Inspired Coating Strategy. Front. Chem. 2019, 7, 431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Zhang, S.; Wang, L.; Liang, X.; Vorstius, J.; Keatch, R.; Corner, G.; Nabi, G.; Davidson, F.; Gadd, G.M.; Zhao, Q. Enhanced Antibacterial and Antiadhesive Activities of Silver-PTFE Nanocomposite Coating for Urinary Catheters. ACS Biomater. Sci. Eng. 2019, 5, 2804–2814. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Amankwah, S.; Abdusemed, K.; Kassa, T. Bacterial Biofilm Destruction: A Focused Review On The Recent Use of Phage-Based Strategies With Other Antibiofilm Agents. NSA 2021, 14, 161–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Zhu, Z.; Wang, Z.; Li, S.; Yuan, X. Antimicrobial Strategies for Urinary Catheters. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. Part A 2019, 107, 445–467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Ivanova, A.; Ivanova, K.; Tzanov, T. Simultaneous Ultrasound-Assisted Hybrid Polyzwitterion/Antimicrobial Peptide Nanoparticles Synthesis and Deposition on Silicone Urinary Catheters for Prevention of Biofilm-Associated Infections. Nanomaterials 2021, 11, 3143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Yu, K.; Lo, J.C.Y.; Yan, M.; Yang, X.; Brooks, D.E.; Hancock, R.E.W.; Lange, D.; Kizhakkedathu, J.N. Anti-Adhesive Antimicrobial Peptide Coating Prevents Catheter Associated Infection in a Mouse Urinary Infection Model. Biomaterials 2017, 116, 69–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Akcam, F.Z.; Kaya, O.; Temel, E.N.; Buyuktuna, S.A.; Unal, O.; Yurekli, V.A. An Investigation of the Effectiveness against Bacteriuria of Silver-Coated Catheters in Short-Term Urinary Catheter Applications: A Randomized Controlled Study. J. Infect. Chemother. 2019, 25, 797–800. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Ogilvie, A.T.; Brisson, B.A.; Singh, A.; Weese, J.S. In Vitro Evaluation of the Impact of Silver Coating on Escherichia Coli Adherence to Urinary Catheters. Can. Vet. J. 2015, 56, 490–494. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  43. Ahamad, I.; Bano, F.; Anwer, R.; Srivastava, P.; Kumar, R.; Fatma, T. Antibiofilm Activities of Biogenic Silver Nanoparticles Against Candida albicans. Front. Microbiol. 2022, 12, 741493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Yassin, M.A.; Elkhooly, T.A.; Elsherbiny, S.M.; Reicha, F.M.; Shokeir, A.A. Facile Coating of Urinary Catheter with Bio–Inspired Antibacterial Coating. Heliyon 2019, 5, e02986. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. More, P.R.; Pandit, S.; Filippis, A.D.; Franci, G.; Mijakovic, I.; Galdiero, M. Silver Nanoparticles: Bactericidal and Mechanistic Approach against Drug Resistant Pathogens. Microorganisms 2023, 11, 369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Xing, M.; Ge, L.; Wang, M.; Li, Q.; Li, X.; Ouyang, J. Nanosilver Particles in Medical Applications: Synthesis, Performance, and Toxicity. IJN 2014, 9, 2399–2407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Goda, R.M.; El-Baz, A.M.; Khalaf, E.M.; Alharbi, N.K.; Elkhooly, T.A.; Shohayeb, M.M. Combating Bacterial Biofilm Formation in Urinary Catheter by Green Silver Nanoparticle. Antibiotics 2022, 11, 495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Wang, X.; Gao, W.; Xu, W.; Xu, S. Fluorescent Ag Nanoclusters Templated by Carboxymethyl-β-Cyclodextrin (CM-β-CD) and Their in Vitro Antimicrobial Activity. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 2013, 33, 656–662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Dias, L.D.; Duarte, L.S.; Naves, P.L.F.; Napolitano, H.B.; Bagnato, V.S. Self-Disinfecting Urethral Catheter to Overcome Urinary Infections: From Antimicrobial Photodynamic Action to Antibacterial Biochemical Entities. Microorganisms 2022, 10, 2484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Fisher, L.E.; Hook, A.L.; Ashraf, W.; Yousef, A.; Barrett, D.A.; Scurr, D.J.; Chen, X.; Smith, E.F.; Fay, M.; Parmenter, C.D.J.; et al. Biomaterial Modification of Urinary Catheters with Antimicrobials to Give Long-Term Broadspectrum Antibiofilm Activity. J. Control. Release 2015, 202, 57–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Faustino, C.M.C.; Lemos, S.M.C.; Monge, N.; Ribeiro, I.A.C. A Scope at Antifouling Strategies to Prevent Catheter-Associated Infections. Adv. Colloid. Interface Sci. 2020, 284, 102230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Li, Z.; Yang, X.; Liu, H.; Yang, X.; Shan, Y.; Xu, X.; Shang, S.; Song, Z. Dual-Functional Antimicrobial Coating Based on a Quaternary Ammonium Salt from Rosin Acid with in Vitro and in Vivo Antimicrobial and Antifouling Properties. Chem. Eng. J. 2019, 374, 564–575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Zhang, H.; Zhu, S.; Yang, J.; Ma, A. Advancing Strategies of Biofouling Control in Water-Treated Polymeric Membranes. Polymers 2022, 14, 1167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Huang, Z.; Ghasemi, H. Hydrophilic Polymer-Based Anti-Biofouling Coatings: Preparation, Mechanism, and Durability. Adv. Colloid. Interface Sci. 2020, 284, 102264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Drulis-Kawa, Z.; Majkowska-Skrobek, G.; Maciejewska, B. Bacteriophages and Phage-Derived Proteins—Application Approaches. CMC 2015, 22, 1757–1773. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Gebremariam, G.; Legese, H.; Woldu, Y.; Araya, T.; Hagos, K.; Gebreyesuswasihun, A. Bacteriological Profile, Risk Factors and Antimicrobial Susceptibility Patterns of Symptomatic Urinary Tract Infection among Students of Mekelle University, Northern Ethiopia. BMC Infect. Dis. 2019, 19, 950. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Pinto, R.M.; Soares, F.A.; Reis, S.; Nunes, C.; Van Dijck, P. Innovative Strategies Toward the Disassembly of the EPS Matrix in Bacterial Biofilms. Front. Microbiol. 2020, 11, 952. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Henly, E.L.; Norris, K.; Rawson, K.; Zoulias, N.; Jaques, L.; Chirila, P.G.; Parkin, K.L.; Kadirvel, M.; Whiteoak, C.; Lacey, M.M.; et al. Impact of Long-Term Quorum Sensing Inhibition on Uropathogenic Escherichia Coli. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2021, 76, 909–919. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Rathinam, P.; Vijay Kumar, H.S.; Viswanathan, P. Eugenol Exhibits Anti-Virulence Properties by Competitively Binding to Quorum Sensing Receptors. Biofouling 2017, 33, 624–639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Giacometti, A.; Cirioni, O.; Gov, Y.; Ghiselli, R.; Del Prete, M.S.; Mocchegiani, F.; Saba, V.; Orlando, F.; Scalise, G.; Balaban, N.; et al. RNA III Inhibiting Peptide Inhibits In Vivo Biofilm Formation by Drug-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2003, 47, 1979–1983. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Pant, J.; Goudie, M.J.; Chaji, S.M.; Johnson, B.W.; Handa, H. Nitric Oxide Releasing Vascular Catheters for Eradicating Bacterial Infection. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 2018, 106, 2849–2857. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Chen, Q.; Zhu, Z.; Wang, J.; Lopez, A.I.; Li, S.; Kumar, A.; Yu, F.; Chen, H.; Cai, C.; Zhang, L. Probiotic E. Coli Nissle 1917 Biofilms on Silicone Substrates for Bacterial Interference against Pathogen Colonization. Acta Biomater. 2017, 50, 353–360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Fry, D.E. Antimicrobial Peptides. Surg. Infect. 2018, 19, 804–811. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Pritchard, A. Statistical Bibliography or Bibliometrics. J. Doc. 1969, 25, 348–349. [Google Scholar]
  65. Zheng, M.; Fu, H.-Z.; Ho, Y.-S. Research Trends and Hotspots Related to Ammonia Oxidation Based on Bibliometric Analysis. Env. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2017, 24, 20409–20421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Osareh, F. Bibliometrics, Citation Analysis and Co-Citation Analysis: A Review of Literature I. Libri 1996, 46, 149–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Choi, D.; Song, B. Exploring Technological Trends in Logistics: Topic Modeling-Based Patent Analysis. Sustainability 2018, 10, 2810. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Kim, G.; Bae, J. A Novel Approach to Forecast Promising Technology through Patent Analysis. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 2017, 117, 228–237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Liu, W.; Wang, J.; Li, C.; Chen, B.; Sun, Y. Using Bibliometric Analysis to Understand the Recent Progress in Agroecosystem Services Research. Ecol. Econ. 2019, 156, 293–305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Cammarano, A.; Dello Iacono, S.; Meglio, C.; Nicolais, L. Advances in Transdermal Drug Delivery Systems: A Bibliometric and Patent Analysis. Pharmaceutics 2023, 15, 2762. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Serpico, L.; Dello Iacono, S.; Cammarano, A.; De Stefano, L. Recent Advances in Stimuli-Responsive Hydrogel-Based Wound Dressing. Gels 2023, 9, 451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Cammarano, A.; Iacono, S.D.; Battisti, M.; De Stefano, L.; Meglio, C.; Nicolais, L. A Systematic Review of Microneedles Technology in Drug Delivery through a Bibliometric and Patent Overview. Heliyon 2024, 10, e40658. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Speziali, M.G. Cellulose Technologies Applied to Biomedical Purposes from the Patentometric Point of View. Cellulose 2020, 27, 10095–10117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Jain, R.; Tripathi, M.; Agarwal, V.; Murthy, J. Patent Data Analytics for Technology Benchmarking: R-Based Implementation. World Pat. Inf. 2020, 60, 101952. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Page, M.J.; McKenzie, J.E.; Bossuyt, P.M.; Boutron, I.; Hoffmann, T.C.; Mulrow, C.D.; Shamseer, L.; Tetzlaff, J.M.; Akl, E.A.; Brennan, S.E.; et al. The PRISMA 2020 Statement: An Updated Guideline for Reporting Systematic Reviews. BMJ 2021, 372, n71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Matta, R.; Schaeffer, A.J. The Top 100 Cited Articles in Pediatric Urology: A Bibliometric Analysis. J. Pediatr. Urol. 2021, 17, 709.e1–709.e12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Speziali, M.G.; Livio, D.F.; Tarabal, V.S.; Granjeiro, P.A. Technology Landscape and a Short Patentometric Review for Antibiofilm Technologies. World Pat. Inf. 2023, 72, 102158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Van Eck, N.J.; Waltman, L. Software Survey: VOSviewer, a Computer Program for Bibliometric Mapping. Scientometrics 2010, 84, 523–538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Bukar, U.A.; Sayeed, M.S.; Razak, S.F.A.; Yogarayan, S.; Amodu, O.A.; Mahmood, R.A.R. A Method for Analyzing Text Using VOSviewer. MethodsX 2023, 11, 102339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Santha Kumar, R.; Kaliyaperumal, K. A Scientometric Analysis of Mobile Technology Publications. Scientometrics 2015, 105, 921–939. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Garcia-Vidal, C.; Sanjuan, G.; Moreno-García, E.; Puerta-Alcalde, P.; Garcia-Pouton, N.; Chumbita, M.; Fernandez-Pittol, M.; Pitart, C.; Inciarte, A.; Bodro, M.; et al. Incidence of Co-Infections and Superinfections in Hospitalized Patients with COVID-19: A Retrospective Cohort Study. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2021, 27, 83–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Martin, B.R. The Use of Multiple Indicators in the Assessment of Basic Research. Scientometrics 1996, 36, 343–362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Tong, S.Y.C.; Davis, J.S.; Eichenberger, E.; Holland, T.L.; Fowler, V.G. Staphylococcus aureus Infections: Epidemiology, Pathophysiology, Clinical Manifestations, and Management. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2015, 28, 603–661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Weiner, L.M.; Webb, A.K.; Limbago, B.; Dudeck, M.A.; Patel, J.; Kallen, A.J.; Edwards, J.R.; Sievert, D.M. Antimicrobial-Resistant Pathogens Associated with Healthcare-Associated Infections: Summary of Data Reported to the National Healthcare Safety Network at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2011–2014. Infect. Control Hosp. Epidemiol. 2016, 37, 1288–1301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Percival, S.L.; Suleman, L.; Vuotto, C.; Donelli, G. Healthcare-Associated Infections, Medical Devices and Biofilms: Risk, Tolerance and Control. J. Med. Microbiol. 2015, 64, 323–334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Khan, H.A.; Baig, F.K.; Mehboob, R. Nosocomial Infections: Epidemiology, Prevention, Control and Surveillance. Asian Pac. J. Trop. Biomed. 2017, 7, 478–482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Ciofu, O.; Tolker-Nielsen, T. Tolerance and Resistance of Pseudomonas Aeruginosabiofilms to Antimicrobial Agents-How P. aeruginosaCan Escape Antibiotics. Front. Microbiol. 2019, 10, 913. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Weiner-Lastinger, L.M.; Abner, S.; Benin, A.L.; Edwards, J.R.; Kallen, A.J.; Karlsson, M.; Magill, S.S.; Pollock, D.; See, I.; Soe, M.M.; et al. Antimicrobial-Resistant Pathogens Associated with Pediatric Healthcare-Associated Infections: Summary of Data Reported to the National Healthcare Safety Network, 2015-2017. Infect. Control Hosp. Epidemiol. 2020, 41, 19–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Nicolle, L.E.; Gupta, K.; Bradley, S.F.; Colgan, R.; DeMuri, G.P.; Drekonja, D.; Eckert, L.O.; Geerlings, S.E.; Köves, B.; Hooton, T.M.; et al. Clinical Practice Guideline for the Management of Asymptomatic Bacteriuria: 2019 Update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2019, 68, E75–E83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Singha, P.; Locklin, J.; Handa, H. A Review of the Recent Advances in Antimicrobial Coatings for Urinary Catheters. Acta Biomater. 2017, 50, 20–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Gupta, P.; Sarkar, S.; Das, B.; Bhattacharjee, S.; Tribedi, P. Biofilm, Pathogenesis and Prevention—A Journey to Break the Wall: A Review. Arch. Microbiol. 2016, 198, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  92. Del Pozo, J.L. Biofilm-Related Disease. Expert. Rev. Anti-Infect. Ther. 2018, 16, 51–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. Li, J.; Wang, L. Analysis of Risk Factors for Infection after Transrectal Ultrasound-Guided Prostate Biopsy and Analysis of the Value of Preoperative Prophylactic Antimicrobial Use. JOMH 2023, 19, 60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. INICC Members; Rosenthal, V.D.; Todi, S.K.; Álvarez-Moreno, C.; Pawar, M.; Karlekar, A.; Zeggwagh, A.A.; Mitrev, Z.; Udwadia, F.E.; Navoa-Ng, J.A.; et al. Impact of a Multidimensional Infection Control Strategy on Catheter-Associated Urinary Tract Infection Rates in the Adult Intensive Care Units of 15 Developing Countries: Findings of the International Nosocomial Infection Control Consortium (INICC). Infection 2012, 40, 517–526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Losito, A.R.; Raffaelli, F.; Del Giacomo, P.; Tumbarello, M. New Drugs for the Treatment of Pseudomonas Aeruginosa Infections with Limited Treatment Options: A Narrative Review. Antibiotics 2022, 11, 579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Juarez, G.E.; Mateyca, C.; Galvan, E.M. Proteus Mirabilis Outcompetes Klebsiella Pneumoniae in Artificial Urine Medium through Secretion of Ammonia and Other Volatile Compounds. Heliyon 2020, 6, e03361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  97. Wasfi, R.; Hamed, S.M.; Amer, M.A.; Fahmy, L.I. Proteus Mirabilis Biofilm: Development and Therapeutic Strategies. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2020, 10, 414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Alhumaid, S.; Al Mutair, A.; Al Alawi, Z.; Alzahrani, A.J.; Tobaiqy, M.; Alresasi, A.M.; Bu-Shehab, I.; Al-Hadary, I.; Alhmeed, N.; Alismail, M.; et al. Antimicrobial Susceptibility of Gram-Positive and Gram-Negative Bacteria: A 5-Year Retrospective Analysis at a Multi-Hospital Healthcare System in Saudi Arabia. Ann. Clin. Microbiol. Antimicrob. 2021, 20, 43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Nair, S.V.; Baranwal, G.; Chatterjee, M.; Sachu, A.; Vasudevan, A.K.; Bose, C.; Banerji, A.; Biswas, R. Antimicrobial Activity of Plumbagin, a Naturally Occurring Naphthoquinone from Plumbago Rosea, against Staphylococcus aureus and Candida albicans. Int. J. Med. Microbiol. 2016, 306, 237–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Zare-Farashbandi, F.; Geraei, E.; Siamaki, S. Study of Co-Authorship Network of Papers in the Journal of Research in Medical Sciences Using Social Network Analysis. J. Res. Med. Sci. 2014, 19, 41–46. [Google Scholar]
  101. Chen, G.; Xiao, L. Selecting Publication Keywords for Domain Analysis in Bibliometrics: A Comparison of Three Methods. J. Informetr. 2016, 10, 212–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Pottier, P.; Lagisz, M.; Burke, S.; Drobniak, S.M.; Downing, P.A.; Macartney, E.L.; Martinig, A.R.; Mizuno, A.; Morrison, K.; Pollo, P.; et al. Title, Abstract and Keywords: A Practical Guide to Maximize the Visibility and Impact of Academic Papers. Proc. R. Soc. B. 2024, 291, 20241222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  103. Gaston, J.R.; Andersen, M.J.; Johnson, A.O.; Bair, K.L.; Sullivan, C.M.; Guterman, L.B.; White, A.N.; Brauer, A.L.; Learman, B.S.; Flores-Mireles, A.L.; et al. Enterococcus Faecalis Polymicrobial Interactions Facilitate Biofilm Formation, Antibiotic Recalcitrance, and Persistent Colonization of the Catheterized Urinary Tract. Pathogens 2020, 9, 835. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Mandakhalikar, K.D.; Wang, R.; Rahmat, J.N.; Chiong, E.; Neoh, K.G.; Tambyah, P.A. Restriction of in Vivo Infection by Antifouling Coating on Urinary Catheter with Controllable and Sustained Silver Release: A Proof of Concept Study. BMC Infect. Dis. 2018, 18, 370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Stefani, S.; Campanile, F.; Santagati, M.; Mezzatesta, M.L.; Cafiso, V.; Pacini, G. Insights and Clinical Perspectives of Daptomycin Resistance in Staphylococcus aureus: A Review of the Available Evidence. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents 2015, 46, 278–289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Benny, A.T.; Rathinam, P.; Dev, S.; Mathew, B.; Radhakrishnan, E. Perillaldehyde Mitigates Virulence Factors and Biofilm Formation of Pseudomonas Aeruginosa Clinical Isolates, by Acting on the Quorum Sensing Mechanism in Vitro. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2022, 133, 385–399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Moureau, N. Hydrophilic Biomaterial Intravenous Hydrogel Catheter for Complication Reduction in PICC and Midline Catheters. Expert. Rev. Med. Devices 2024, 21, 207–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Page, S.; Hazen, D.; Kelley, K.; Singh, R.; Rodgers, R.B.; Brewer, B.; Sadowski, J.; Desai, A.; Beeler, C.; Webb, D.; et al. Changing the Culture of Urine Culturing: Utilizing Agile Implementation to Improve Diagnostic Stewardship in the ICU. Am. J. Infect. Control 2020, 48, 1375–1380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  109. Saini, H.; Chhibber, S.; Harjai, K. Antimicrobial and Antifouling Efficacy of Urinary Catheters Impregnated with a Combination of Macrolide and Fluoroquinolone Antibiotics against Pseudomonas Aeruginosa. Biofouling 2016, 32, 795–806. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Bekele, T.; Tesfaye, A.; Sewunet, T.; Waktola, H.D. Pseudomonas Aeruginosa Isolates and Their Antimicrobial Susceptibility Pattern among Catheterized Patients at Jimma University Teaching Hospital, Jimma, Ethiopia. BMC Res. Notes 2015, 8, 488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Maniam, L.; Vellasamy, K.M.; Ong, T.A.; Teh, C.S.J.; Jabar, K.A.; Mariappan, V.; Narayanan, V.; Vadivelu, J.; Pallath, V. Genotypic Characteristics of Uropathogenic Escherichia Coli Isolated from Complicated Urinary Tract Infection (cUTI) and Asymptomatic Bacteriuria—A Relational Analysis. PeerJ 2023, 11, e15305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  112. Garcell, H.G.; Al-Ajmi, J.; Arias, A.V.; Abraham, J.C.; Garmendia, A.M.F.; Hernandez, T.M.F. Catheter-Associated Urinary Tract Infection and Urinary Catheter Utilization Ratio over 9 Years, and the Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on the Incidence of Infection in Medical and Surgical Wards in a Single Facility in Western Qatar. Qatar Med. J. 2023, 2023, 14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  113. Fujino, K.; Hiyama, Y.; Uehara, T.; Ichihara, K.; Hashimoto, J.; Fujii, S.; Shinagawa, M.; Takahashi, S.; Masumori, N. The Efficacy of Faropenem for Patients with Acute Cystitis Caused by Extended Spectrum β-Lactamase Producing Escherichia Coli. J. Infect. Chemother. 2017, 23, 336–338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Baten, E.; Van Der Aa, F.; Goethuys, H.; Slabbaert, K.; Arijs, I.; Van Renterghem, K. Antimicrobial Prophylaxis in Transurethral Resection of the Prostate: Results of a Randomized Trial. J. Urol. 2021, 205, 1748–1752. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  115. Latour, K.; Lepeleire, J.D.; Jans, B.; Buntinx, F.; Catry, B. Diagnosis, Prevention and Control of Urinary Tract Infections: A Survey of Routine Practices in Belgian Nursing Homes. J. Infect. Prevent. 2020, 21, 182–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Agarwal, R.; Mohapatra, S.; Rath, G.P.; Kapil, A. Active Surveillance of Health Care Associated Infections in Neurosurgical Patients. J. Clin. Diagn. Res. 2017, 11, DC01–DC04. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Takaya, S.; Hayakawa, K.; Matsunaga, N.; Moriyama, Y.; Katanami, Y.; Tajima, T.; Tanaka, C.; Kimura, Y.; Saito, S.; Kusama, Y.; et al. Surveillance Systems for Healthcare-Associated Infection in High and Upper-Middle Income Countries: A Scoping Review. J. Infect. Chemother. 2020, 26, 429–437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Chen, Y.; Zhao, J.Y.; Shan, X.; Han, X.L.; Tian, S.G.; Chen, F.Y.; Su, X.T.; Sun, Y.S.; Huang, L.Y.; Han, L.; et al. A Point-Prevalence Survey of Healthcare-Associated Infection in Fifty-Two Chinese Hospitals. J. Hosp. Infect. 2017, 95, 105–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Suebsubanant, M. Clinical Outcomes and Associated Factors for Mortality among Pediatric Patients with Carbapenem-Resistant Acinetobacter Baumannii. J. Med. Assoc. Thai 2023, 106, 534–543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Baveja, U.K.; Govil, D.; Wadhwa, T.; Mehta, Y. Susceptibility of Multi-Drug-Resistant Organisms (MDROs), Isolated from Cases of Urinary Tract Infection to Fosfomycin (The New Antibiotic) Vis-a-Vis Other Antimicrobial Agents. J. Commun. Dis. 2018, 50, 34–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Atamna-Mawassi, H.; Huberman-Samuel, M.; Hershcovitz, S.; Karny-Epstein, N.; Kola, A.; Cortés, L.E.L.; Leibovici, L.; Yahav, D. Interventions to Reduce Infections Caused by Multidrug Resistant Enterobacteriaceae (MDR-E): A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J. Infect. 2021, 83, 156–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  122. Nguyen, S.N.; Thi Le, H.T.; Tran, T.D.; Vu, L.T.; Ho, T.H. Clinical Epidemiology Characteristics and Antibiotic Resistance Associated with Urinary Tract Infections Caused by E. Coli. Int. J. Nephrol. 2022, 2022, 2552990. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  123. Limem, S.; Harun, R.B.; Dubois, M.; Martin, D.P.; Rizk, S. Methods for 3D Printing of Poly-4-Hydroxybutyrate and Copolymers. Tepha US20190375149A1, 12 December 2019. [Google Scholar]
  124. Eltorai, A.E.M. Method, System, and Devices of Safe, Antimicrobial Light-Emitting Catheters, Tubes, and Instruments. Luminary Catheters US12246189B2, 6 June 2019. [Google Scholar]
  125. Erbey, J.R.; Tucker, B.J.; Upperco, J.L. Coated Urinary Catheter or Ureteral Stent and Method. Roivios US11541205B2, 30 November 2018. [Google Scholar]
  126. Knapp, T.E.; Nishtala, V. Enhanced Pre-Wetted Intermittent Catheter with Lubricious Coating. Bard Inc. AU2014248744B2, 12 March 2014. [Google Scholar]
  127. Littleton, K.R.; Detlor, L.R.; Rego, A. Method for Coating Catheters with a Layer of Antimicrobial Agent. Pursuit Vascular Inc. US9352142B2, 22 May 2015. [Google Scholar]
  128. Eltorai, A.E.M.; Dicesare, P. Antimicrobial Light-Emitting Device and Method of Reducing Catheter-Associated Urinary Tract Infections. Lumen Catheters US12115385B2, 28 June 2022. [Google Scholar]
  129. Rosenblatt, J.; Raad, I. Antimicrobial Catheters. University of Texas US11738119B2, 8 July 2020. [Google Scholar]
  130. Wiita, G.D. Antimicrobial Shield and Barrier for Urinary Catheter. Poiesis Medical US2018/0311469A1, 27 April 2018. [Google Scholar]
  131. Kalt, J.; Lee, H. Drug Delivery Devices and Methods for Use with a Urinary Catheter. Taris Biomedical US2020/0345976A1, 8 November 2018. [Google Scholar]
  132. Limaye, A.; Taylor, M. Catheter with Inherent Antimicrobial Properties. Becton Dickinson and Company US2023/0321326A1, 11 April 2022. [Google Scholar]
  133. Panesar, S. Hydrophilic Urinary Catheter Products with Microcapsules of Anti-Bacterial Agents. Hollister WO2023/215683A1, 25 April 2023. [Google Scholar]
  134. Bakaletz, L.O.; Goodman, S.D. Peptides and Antibodies for the Removal of Biofilms. The Research Institute at Nationwide Children’s Hospital EP3328429A4, 1 August 2016. [Google Scholar]
  135. Bakaletz, L.O.; Goodman Steven, D. Hu Specific Interfering Agents. The Research Institute at Nationwide Children’s Hospital WO2017/066719A2, 14 October 2016. [Google Scholar]
  136. Schwartz, U.W. Antimicrobial Preparations, Methods for Preparing the Same and Uses Thereof to Combat Microorganisms. Ipabc US10470459B2, 28 May 2015. [Google Scholar]
  137. Deber, C.M. Cationic Antimicrobial Peptides. Hospital for Sick Children US2015/0290278A1, 12 December 2019. [Google Scholar]
  138. Smyth, H.; Bahamondez-Canas, T.; Tewes, F.; Heersema, L. Antibiofilm Formulations and Use Thereof. University of Texas WO2019/104213A1, 21 November 2018. [Google Scholar]
  139. Hayouka, Z. Methods for Disrupting Biofilms. Yissum Research Development Company US2019/0038701A1, 2 February 2017. [Google Scholar]
  140. Mysore, V.G.T.; Pirttilä, A.M. Antimicrobial Peptides, Their Variants and Uses. Oulun Yliopisto US11096985B2, 13 January 2020. [Google Scholar]
  141. Kizhakkedathu, J.; Lange, D.; Yu, K.; Hancock, R. Polymeric Antifouling Coating with Antimicrobial Peptides. University of British Columbia US2024/0301218A1, 2 June 2022. [Google Scholar]
  142. Goodman, S.D.; Bakaletz, L.O. Combination Therapies for the Treatment and Prevention of Biofilms. The Research Institute at Nationwide Children’s Hospital WO2022/010942A3, 6 July 2021. [Google Scholar]
  143. Nicolau, E.; Ortiz, G.V. Compositions Including Antimicrobial Polymer-Peptide Conjugates and Uses Thereof. University of Puerto Rico WO2021/154703A1, 26 January 2021. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. The PRISMA flow chart. (A) PRISMA flow diagram of bibliometric database analysis; (B) PRISMA flow diagram of patent database analysis.
Figure 1. The PRISMA flow chart. (A) PRISMA flow diagram of bibliometric database analysis; (B) PRISMA flow diagram of patent database analysis.
Idr 17 00064 g001
Figure 2. The biofilm formation process and maturation onto the catheter surface (image created with BioRender).
Figure 2. The biofilm formation process and maturation onto the catheter surface (image created with BioRender).
Idr 17 00064 g002
Figure 3. Antimicrobial strategies to prevent biofilm formation on the urinary catheter surface (image created with BioRender).
Figure 3. Antimicrobial strategies to prevent biofilm formation on the urinary catheter surface (image created with BioRender).
Idr 17 00064 g003
Figure 4. Trend of published papers over the years on CAUTIs and their prevention.
Figure 4. Trend of published papers over the years on CAUTIs and their prevention.
Idr 17 00064 g004
Figure 5. The top countries publishing papers on CAUTIs and their prevention. In red are countries with a higher number of scientific papers, and in green are the less prolific countries.
Figure 5. The top countries publishing papers on CAUTIs and their prevention. In red are countries with a higher number of scientific papers, and in green are the less prolific countries.
Idr 17 00064 g005
Figure 6. The co-authorship network of countries publishing on CAUTIs and their prevention (via VOSviewer).
Figure 6. The co-authorship network of countries publishing on CAUTIs and their prevention (via VOSviewer).
Idr 17 00064 g006
Figure 7. Network visualization map of the co-occurrence analysis of the keywords about strategies to prevent CAUTIs (via VOSviewer, n = 2813 with a minimum occurrence of keywords = 5).
Figure 7. Network visualization map of the co-occurrence analysis of the keywords about strategies to prevent CAUTIs (via VOSviewer, n = 2813 with a minimum occurrence of keywords = 5).
Idr 17 00064 g007
Figure 8. Overlay visualization map of the co-occurrence analysis of the keywords on strategies to prevent CAUTIs (via VOSviewer n = 2813 with a minimum occurrence of a keyword = 5).
Figure 8. Overlay visualization map of the co-occurrence analysis of the keywords on strategies to prevent CAUTIs (via VOSviewer n = 2813 with a minimum occurrence of a keyword = 5).
Idr 17 00064 g008
Figure 9. Temporal trend of patent documents, with the filed patents in dark gray and the granted patents in light gray.
Figure 9. Temporal trend of patent documents, with the filed patents in dark gray and the granted patents in light gray.
Idr 17 00064 g009
Figure 10. Network visualization map of the co-occurrence analysis of the patents’ keywords in strategies to prevent CAUTIs (via VOSviewer).
Figure 10. Network visualization map of the co-occurrence analysis of the patents’ keywords in strategies to prevent CAUTIs (via VOSviewer).
Idr 17 00064 g010
Figure 11. Overlay visualization map of the co-occurrence analysis of the patents’ keywords in strategies to prevent CAUTIs (via VOSviewer).
Figure 11. Overlay visualization map of the co-occurrence analysis of the patents’ keywords in strategies to prevent CAUTIs (via VOSviewer).
Idr 17 00064 g011
Table 1. Number of publications on strategies to prevent CAUTIs over the years, including annual growth rate.
Table 1. Number of publications on strategies to prevent CAUTIs over the years, including annual growth rate.
YearNumber of Publications% of PublicationsAGR
2014946.240.00
2015956.311.06
20161238.1729.47
20171127.44−8.94
20181258.3011.61
20191298.573.20
20201499.8915.50
202115410.233.36
202217211.4211.69
202315410.23−10.47
202419913.2129.22
Table 2. Top 10 journals publishing papers on CAUTIs and their prevention.
Table 2. Top 10 journals publishing papers on CAUTIs and their prevention.
RankSourceTotal PublicationsIF (2023)Total Citations
1Antibiotics474.3592
2BMC Infectious Diseases303.4510
3Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology2731930
4Journal Of Hospital Infection253.9674
5Infection and Drug Resistance232.9380
6American Journal of Infection Control224.9477
7PLOS One172.9346
8European Journal of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases173.7292
9Antimicrobial Resistance and Infection Control174.8327
10Journal Of Infection and Chemotherapy151.9346
Table 3. The highest cited articles on CAUTIs and their prevention.
Table 3. The highest cited articles on CAUTIs and their prevention.
TitlePYJournalCitationsRef.
Staphylococcus aureus infections: Epidemiology, pathophysiology,
clinical manifestations, and management
2015Clinical Microbiology Reviews3444[83]
Antimicrobial-Resistant Pathogens Associated with Healthcare-Associated Infections:
Summary of Data Reported to the National Healthcare Safety Network at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
2016Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology962[84]
Healthcare-Associated infections, medical devices and biofilms:
Risk, tolerance and control
2015Journal of Medical Microbiology572[85]
Nosocomial infections:
Epidemiology, prevention, control and surveillance
2017Asian Pacific Journal of Tropical Biomedicine479[86]
Tolerance and resistance of pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms
to antimicrobial agents-how P. aeruginosa can escape antibiotics
2019Frontiers in Microbiology468[87]
Antimicrobial-resistant pathogens associated with pediatric healthcare-associated infections:
Summary of data reported to the National Healthcare Safety Network
2020Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology435[88]
Clinical practice guideline for the management of asymptomatic bacteriuria:
2019 update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America
2019Clinical Infectious Diseases406[89]
A review of the recent advances
in antimicrobial coatings for urinary catheters
2017Acta Biomaterialia372[90]
Biofilm, pathogenesis, and prevention
a journey to break the wall: a review
2016Archives of Microbiology349[91]
Biofilm-related disease2018Expert Review of Anti-Infective Therapy328[92]
Table 4. Main thematic areas on CAUTIs and their prevention impact.
Table 4. Main thematic areas on CAUTIs and their prevention impact.
Subject AreaDocument Count
Medicine1153
Immunology and Microbiology275
Biochemistry, Genetics, and Molecular Biology205
Pharmacology, Toxicology, and Pharmaceutics189
Materials Science91
Engineering71
Chemical Engineering52
Chemistry50
Nursing29
Veterinary38
Table 5. Top 10 public funding sponsors in the field of CAUTIs and their prevention.
Table 5. Top 10 public funding sponsors in the field of CAUTIs and their prevention.
Funding SponsorCountryDocuments Count
National Institutes of HealthUnited States80
U.S. Department of Health and Human ServicesUnited States60
European CommissionEuropean Union30
European Regional Development FundEuropean Union30
National Institute of Allergy and Infectious DiseasesUnited States26
National Natural Science Foundation of ChinaChina26
Centers for Disease Control and PreventionUnited States19
Ministerio de Economía y CompetitividadSpain18
National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney DiseasesUnited States17
Instituto de Salud Carlos IIISpain16
Table 6. The top 50 keywords (10 for each cluster) obtained by VOSviewer software from the SCOPUS database.
Table 6. The top 50 keywords (10 for each cluster) obtained by VOSviewer software from the SCOPUS database.
Keywords
Cluster 1Cluster 2Cluster 3Cluster 4Cluster 5
biofilmCatheter-associated urinary tract infectionurinary tract infectionantimicrobial resistancerisk factors
urinary catheterbacteremiabacteriuriamulti-drug resistancemortality
Escherichia coliintensive care unitantibioticshealthcare-associated infectionscarbapenem
antimicrobialssepsisantimicrobial stewardshipinfection prevention and controlklebsiella pneumoniae
antibiotic resistancebloodstream infectionsinfectionsnosocomial infectionsdrug resistance
catheterhospital-acquired infectioncystitissurveillancegram-negative
Pseudomonas aeruginosapediatricspyelonephritisantibiotic stewardshipuropathogens
Proteus mirabilisCOVID-19diagnosisantibiotic prophylaxisAcinetobacter baumannii
Staphylococcus aureusantimicrobial susceptibilitytreatmentpreventionfluoroquinolones
Enterococcus faecalispathogenschildrenantimicrobial usecarbapenem-resistant
Table 7. Top 10 applicants in strategies to prevent CAUTIs.
Table 7. Top 10 applicants in strategies to prevent CAUTIs.
Applicant% DocumentsCountry
University of Texas6.80USA
Polyphor 4.07Switzerland
Bard4.07USA
Tepha medical device3.53USA
Hollister Inc.2.44USA
Akeso biomedical2.17USA
Griffith Donald2.17USA
University of Zurich1.90Switzerland
Alps South1.74Italy
University of Stanford1.63USA
Table 8. The top 40 keywords (8 for each cluster) obtained by VOSviewer software from retrieval The Lens database.
Table 8. The top 40 keywords (8 for each cluster) obtained by VOSviewer software from retrieval The Lens database.
Keywords
Cluster 1Cluster 2Cluster 3Cluster 4Cluster 5
Antimicrobial coatingGram-negative bacteriaUrinary stent deviceCytotoxicityImplantable device
Hydrophilic coatingEscherichia coliNegative pressureParallel libraryTube
Bacterial strainKlebsiella PneumoniaProtective surface areaPhage therapyEmbodiment
SurfaceAntimicrobial peptideLubricantTherapeutic useP4HB
Urinary catheterPeptideCoatingAntibacterial agentHydroxybutyrate
BiofoulingFormulationPortBacterial infectionMinocycline
PolymerDisinfectantUrinary tractDiseaseEDTA
DeliveryAcceptable saltTissueAntibioticWater
Table 9. List of the most relevant patents that refer to catheters with integrated antimicrobial features.
Table 9. List of the most relevant patents that refer to catheters with integrated antimicrobial features.
Application NumberApplication DateTitleOwnersNoteRef.
US 2019/0168023 A15 December 2017Method, System, and Devices of Safe, Antimicrobial Light-Emitting Catheters, Tubes, and InstrumentsLumen Catheters LLCThe device consists of a thin, flexible tube with an optically transparent wall. It incorporates a light transmitter, which emits UV light that is effective in killing or inactivating bacteria, viruses, and other pathogens.[124]
US 2019/0091442 A130 November 2018Coated Ureteral Catheter or Ureteral Stent and MethodStrataca Systems LimitedThe device comprises a urinary catheter or stent with a protective surface area crucial for maintaining proper drainage and preventing the occlusion of drainage holes. It is coated with a specific material for lubrication, antimicrobial properties, and pH buffering.[125]
US 9694113 B27 April 2015Enhanced Pre-Wetted Intermittent Catheter with Lubricious CoatingBard Inc.The catheter assembly comprises a tube-like conduit. Its distal end includes at least one opening for receiving fluid from the patient’s body. The conduit and the sleeve may be arranged in a helical coil configuration. The outer surface of the conduit may feature an antimicrobial coating, to help in the inhibition of the growth of bacteria or other microorganisms on the catheter surface.[126]
US 10709819 B221 September 2017Method For Coating Catheters with a Layer of Antimicrobial AgentValencide LLCA catheter made of highly flexible elastomeric material with an antimicrobial coating designed to reduce the risk of device-associated infections in the urinary tract, respiratory system, and bloodstream. This coating is intended to release iodine in a controlled manner over time, thereby inhibiting the growth of bacteria and other microorganisms on the catheter surface.[127]
US 2022/0323787 A128 June 2022Antimicrobial Light-Emitting Device and Method of Reducing Catheter-Associated Urinary Tract InfectionsLumen Catheters LLCThis invention relates to an antimicrobial urinary catheter device that uses safe, antimicrobial light to disinfect the distal urethra, urethral meatus, and the area surrounding an indwelling urinary catheter. The illumination source is designed to emit light that can eradicate pathogens without being harmful for the patient.[128]
US 11738119 B28 July 2020Antimicrobial CathetersUniversity Of TexasAn antimicrobial catheter made up of a low durometer aliphatic polyether polyurethane impregnated with a first antimicrobial agent (e.g., minocycline and rifampin) and coated with a second antimicrobial agent (e.g., chlorhexidine, gendine, or gardine).[129]
US 2018/0311469 A127 April 2018Antimicrobial Shield and Barrier for Urinary CatheterPoiesis Medical LLCA flexible protective barrier with antimicrobial, antiseptic, and antibacterial properties is designed to interact with a urinary catheter. The shield, which is adaptable, is structured to smoothly slide onto the catheter. It consists of one or more sections that are shaped to conform to and adhere to the urinary meatus and/or the surrounding skin or tissues of the targeted patient. Additionally, a flexible and expandable drape, aligned with the catheter, is connected to the shield, adding an extra layer of protection to prevent the entry of bacteria, fungi, and contaminants into the urinary tract.[130]
US 2020/0345976 A108 November 2018Drug Delivery Devices and Methods for Use with a Urinary CatheterTaris Biomedical LLCThe urinary catheter is connected to a drug-delivery device.
The flexible elongated body, along with the drug delivery lumen, is inserted into the patient’s urethra. The drug, contained within the drug chamber of the reservoir, is then delivered through the drug delivery lumen into the urinary tract.
[131]
US 2023/0321326 A111 April 2022Catheter with Inherent Antimicrobial PropertiesBecton Dickinson Co.The catheter is constructed using polyhydroxyalkanoates PHA, a biopolymer known for its antimicrobial properties.
PHA materials, such as poly-4-hydroxybutyrate (P4HB) and copolymers of P4HB, are particularly useful for conferring antimicrobial characteristics to the catheter.
[132]
WO 2023/215683 A125 April 2023Hydrophilic Urinary Catheter Products with Microcapsules of Anti-Bacterial AgentsHollister Inc.The provided urinary catheter has a hydrophilic coating and incorporates anti-microbial microcapsules that release an antimicrobial agent upon irradiation.[133]
Table 10. List of the most relevant patents referring to antimicrobial solutions and technologies applied in various fields.
Table 10. List of the most relevant patents referring to antimicrobial solutions and technologies applied in various fields.
Application NumberApplication DateTitleOwnersNoteRef.
US 2019/0000971 A11 August 2016Peptides and Antibodies for The Removal of BiofilmsResearch Institute at Nationwide Children’s HospitalIsolated or recombinant polypeptides are used in vaccinating individuals with chronic or recurrent biofilm-related diseases.
The polypeptides stimulate the immune system to generate antibodies that target bacteria within the biofilm, disrupting its construction and hindering its maintenance.
The antibodies generated by the immune system can prevent or clear bacterial infections by interfering with biofilm formation and function.
[134]
WO 2017/066719 A214 October 2016Hu Specific Interfering AgentsResearch Institute at Nationwide Children’s HospitalThe method involves the administration of interfering agents able to inhibit the binding of an HU protein to microbial DNA.
HU proteins play a key role in binding DNA within the biofilm structure.
The interfering agents compete with HU proteins for binding sites on microbial DNA, disrupting the stability of the biofilm.
[135]
WO 2015/181558 A128 May 2015Antimicrobial Preparations, Methods for Preparing the Same and Uses Thereof to Combat MicroorganismsIpabc Ltd.The patent involves the preparation of antimicrobial substances containing crystalline particles of either an antimicrobial peptide or an antimicrobial polyene. The application of this purpose is to combat microorganisms.
The uses of these preparations include combating a wide range of microorganisms, showcasing their versatility in antimicrobial treatments.
[136]
US 2015/0290278 A115 April 2015Cationic Antimicrobial PeptidesThe Hospital for Sick ChildrenThe method combines a specific peptide and an antibiotic to treat infections synergistically.
The peptide has a hydrophobic sequence (Z) with an average hydrophobicity value of at least 0.3 on the Liu-Deber scale, which contributes to the antimicrobial activity.
[137]
WO 2019/104213 A121 November 2018Antibiofilm Formulations and Use ThereofUniversity of TexasAn approach to treat biofilm infections is addressed, presenting a comprehensive array of compositions and methods specifically tailored to address this challenging medical issue. By incorporating modified antibiotics and a diverse range of excipients, the method aims to achieve a more effective response with respect to traditional antibiotic therapies.[138]
US 11103547 B22 February 2017Methods for Disrupting BiofilmsYissum Research Development Company of the Hebrew University of Jerusalem Ltd.The invention involves the administration of a pharmaceutical composition to subjects in need of treatment, or for the prevention of biofilm-associated infections.
The composition comprises a mixture of random-sequence peptides along with a pharmaceutically acceptable carrier.
[139]
US 2020/0138901 A113 January 2020Antimicrobial Peptides, their Variants and UsesChain Antimicrobials OyIntroduction of novel AMPs with a broad spectrum of action in controlling microbial growth and infections. The versatility of the peptides extends to various industries, offering solutions for microbial control and preservation in diverse settings.[140]
WO 2022/251963 A12 June 2022Polymeric Antifouling Coating with Antimicrobial PeptidesUni of British ColumbiaCompositions and methods for coating substrates with polymeric binders and AMPs, to limit biofouling and protein binding, offering solutions for reducing contamination in various applications and improving performance.[141]
WO 2022/010942 A26 July 2021Combination Therapies for the Treatment and Prevention of BiofilmsRes Inst Nationwide Childrens HospitalA novel approach to treat and prevent biofilms and associated disorders by combining HMGB (high-mobility group box) polypeptides with anti-DNABII antibodies.
HMGB polypeptides are known for their ability to disrupt biofilms, while anti-DNABII antibodies specifically target DNABII proteins, which are crucial for biofilm stability.
The specific amino acid sequences in the anti-DNABII antibody ensure effective targeting and binding to DNABII proteins, enhancing the therapeutic efficacy of the composition.
[142]
WO 2021/154703 A126 June 2021Compositions Including Antimicrobial Polymer-Peptide Conjugates and Uses ThereofUniversity of Puerto RicoA peptide conjugate comprising a PEG arm conjugated to an AMP with a specific amino acid sequence.[143]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Corrado, B.; Cammarano, A.; Dello Iacono, S.; Renzi, E.; Moretta, R.; Mercurio, M.E.; Ascione, L.; Cummaro, A.; Meglio, C.; Nicolais, L. A Comprehensive Review of Progress in Preventing Urinary Infections Associated with the Use of Urinary Catheters: A Dual Analysis of Publications and Patents. Infect. Dis. Rep. 2025, 17, 64. https://doi.org/10.3390/idr17030064

AMA Style

Corrado B, Cammarano A, Dello Iacono S, Renzi E, Moretta R, Mercurio ME, Ascione L, Cummaro A, Meglio C, Nicolais L. A Comprehensive Review of Progress in Preventing Urinary Infections Associated with the Use of Urinary Catheters: A Dual Analysis of Publications and Patents. Infectious Disease Reports. 2025; 17(3):64. https://doi.org/10.3390/idr17030064

Chicago/Turabian Style

Corrado, Brunella, Aniello Cammarano, Stefania Dello Iacono, Emilia Renzi, Rosalba Moretta, Maria Emilia Mercurio, Laura Ascione, Annunziata Cummaro, Caterina Meglio, and Luigi Nicolais. 2025. "A Comprehensive Review of Progress in Preventing Urinary Infections Associated with the Use of Urinary Catheters: A Dual Analysis of Publications and Patents" Infectious Disease Reports 17, no. 3: 64. https://doi.org/10.3390/idr17030064

APA Style

Corrado, B., Cammarano, A., Dello Iacono, S., Renzi, E., Moretta, R., Mercurio, M. E., Ascione, L., Cummaro, A., Meglio, C., & Nicolais, L. (2025). A Comprehensive Review of Progress in Preventing Urinary Infections Associated with the Use of Urinary Catheters: A Dual Analysis of Publications and Patents. Infectious Disease Reports, 17(3), 64. https://doi.org/10.3390/idr17030064

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop