Next Article in Journal
Research on Establishment of Vehicle Energy Distribution Model and Energy Consumption Optimization Based on Electric Hybrid System
Next Article in Special Issue
Research on Hydrogen Consumption and Driving Range of Hydrogen Fuel Cell Vehicle under the CLTC-P Condition
Previous Article in Journal
An Adaptive Adjustment Method of Equivalent Factor Considering Speed Predict Information
Previous Article in Special Issue
Real Driving Range in Electric Vehicles: Influence on Fuel Consumption and Carbon Emissions
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

The Effect of Driving Cycle Duration on Its Representativeness

World Electr. Veh. J. 2021, 12(4), 212; https://doi.org/10.3390/wevj12040212
by Michael Giraldo 1, Luis F. Quirama 2, José I. Huertas 3,* and Juan E. Tibaquirá 2
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
World Electr. Veh. J. 2021, 12(4), 212; https://doi.org/10.3390/wevj12040212
Submission received: 9 September 2021 / Revised: 19 October 2021 / Accepted: 20 October 2021 / Published: 27 October 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Fuel Consumption and Emissions from Vehicles)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

The article examines the influence of the driving cycle duration on its representativeness. For this purpose, the existing database for the diesel bus fleet was used.

 

Some comments:

  1. The title of the article is too general and should be clarified.
  2. The table with the list of CPi patterns is missing
  3. What is actually MRDi - mean RDi (Equation2) or median RDi (abbreviation table)?

Author Response

Please see attached file

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report

The paper study discusses about the effect of different time durations of the
DCs on their representativeness. 

The paper is well structured and dealt with the latest related state of the art.

The conclusion can be improved a bit to deliver the contribution and the novelty of the work that have been claimed.

Thank you.

Author Response

The conclusion can be improved a bit to deliver the contribution and the novelty of the work that have been claimed.

Reply: Ok. Manuscript was modified.

The conclusion section was double checked to make sure that the contributions are included.

Round 2

Reviewer 1 Report

I accept the correction of the article

Back to TopTop