3.1. SEM
The structure of the obtained PLA-based composites was analyzed using scanning electron microscopy (SEM) in order to evaluate the distribution and adhesion of the natural fillers seashells, eggshells, walnut shell powder, and coffee grounds within the polymer matrix. Representative SEM micrographs taken at different magnifications are shown in
Figure 2,
Figure 3,
Figure 4 and
Figure 5 for each composite to illustrate the morphology of the fractured surfaces after tensile failure.
The images reveal notable differences in particle dispersion, interfacial bonding, and fracture behavior depending on the type of used filler. For the PLA15S composite (
Figure 2), the particles exhibit irregular and angular shapes and are partially embedded in the matrix. Some interfacial voids are visible, suggesting limited adhesion between the hard mineral fillers and the PLA phase. The fractured surface appears relatively flat and layered, which is indicative of brittle fracture dominated by the matrix. Estimated particle size is 20–50 µm.
In contrast, the PLA15E composite (
Figure 3) shows a more porous structure with numerous rounder filler particles. The adhesion between the eggshell powder and PLA appears weaker, as evidenced by the occurrence of matrix detachment and the presence of microvoids around the particles. This suggests a less efficient load transfer and a higher likelihood of crack initiation at the filler–matrix interface.
The PLA15W composite (
Figure 4) demonstrates the most irregular and rough fracture surface among the tested materials. The walnut shell particles are larger and more porous and appear well anchored in the matrix. This may be attributed to the increased surface roughness of the filler, promoting mechanical interlocking. Despite the presence of voids, the general cohesion between the filler and matrix seems improved compared to the other systems, possibly due to the higher compatibility between the lignocellulosic walnut powder and the PLA matrix.
The PLA15C composite (
Figure 5) exhibits a relatively heterogeneous and moderately rough fracture surface compared to the other tested composites. The coffee particles are irregular in shape, with a broad size distribution, and appear only partially embedded within the PLA matrix. In several regions, visible interfacial gaps and particle pull-out suggest limited adhesion between the hydrophilic coffee filler and the hydrophobic polymer matrix (compared by mechanical tests).
Despite these debonding features, localized areas show signs of plastic deformation in the PLA matrix surrounding the particles, which may indicate partial mechanical interlocking. The surface of the coffee particles appears smoother than that of other lignocellulosic fillers, which may contribute to the weaker interaction observed. Overall, the interfacial bonding in PLA15C seems less effective than in the PLA15W system, likely due to lower surface roughness and reduced compatibility between the spent coffee grounds and PLA.
3.2. Mechanical Properties
The incorporation of various bio-originating fillers into the PLA matrix significantly influenced the mechanical performance of the resulting biocomposites.
Table 3 presents a comparative analysis of tensile strength and Young’s modulus and
Figure S1 representative curves for neat PLA and its composites reinforced with seashells (S), eggshells (E), walnut shell powder (W), and coffee grounds (C).
The unmodified PLA exhibited a baseline tensile strength of approximately 32 MPa, consistent with values reported in the literature for injection-molded or 3D-printed PLA-based materials [
46,
47]. Upon the addition of biofillers, a pronounced increase in tensile strength was observed across all systems, with values ranging from ~45 MPa (PLA15E) to ~55 MPa (PLA).
Among the studied composites, the PLA15S composite showed the highest tensile strength (~55 MPa), representing a ~72% enhancement over neat PLA. This notable improvement may be attributed to the high calcium carbonate content and the irregular, angular morphology of powdered seashells, which likely promoted effective stress transfer at the matrix–filler interface. Similarly, PLA15C achieved a tensile strength of ~54 MPa, suggesting that coffee grounds also play a reinforcing role, potentially due to their fibrous microstructure and lignocellulosic composition enhancing interfacial adhesion.
PLA15W and PLA15E composites also demonstrated elevated tensile strengths, albeit to a lesser extent (~49 MPa and ~45 MPa, respectively). The moderate enhancement for E/PLA may be due to the relatively fine and uniform particle distribution of eggshell powder but potentially limited interfacial bonding due to the smoother surface morphology and lower aspect ratio. In the case of PLA15W, although the walnut shell filler has high rigidity, the organic and carbonaceous nature of the particles may have led to stress concentrations or weak bonding regions, limiting the improvement.
In contrast to tensile strength, the introduction of biofillers generally resulted in a reduction in Young’s modulus compared to neat PLA, which exhibited a modulus of ~5200 MPa. The most significant decrease was observed for PLA15W, with a modulus of ~4200 MPa, representing a ~20% reduction. The reduction in stiffness is likely associated with poor dispersion or limited interfacial compatibility, leading to microvoids or regions of stress shielding within the matrix.
Similarly, PLA15S and PLA15E composites showed lower modulus values (~4300 MPa and ~4400 MPa, respectively). Although these fillers enhanced strength, they appeared to soften the composite overall, possibly due to the particulate nature of the reinforcements. Interestingly, PLA15C demonstrated the highest modulus among the modified composites (~4800 MPa), indicating that coffee-derived lignocellulosic particles may provide some reinforcing rigidity due to their fibrous structure and relatively high stiffness.
The divergent trends in tensile strength and stiffness suggest that biofillers contributed more significantly to energy dissipation and crack deflection mechanisms, rather than directly increasing composite rigidity. The enhancement in strength, coupled with modulus reduction, points to toughening effects introduced by the fillers—particularly in the PLA15S and PLA15C systems—through mechanisms such as microcrack bridging, stress transfer, and particle–matrix interlocking.
Moreover, the distinct behavior among the fillers underscores the importance of filler morphology, particle size, chemical composition, and surface properties. Calcium-rich fillers (S, E) tend to promote better strength but lower stiffness, whereas lignocellulosic fillers (W, C) show more variability depending on interfacial bonding and particle rigidity.
The mechanical properties of PLA-based composites modified with various natural fillers seashells (S), eggshells (E), walnut shells (W), and coffee grounds (C) were analyzed to evaluate the influence of these bio-based reinforcements on flexural strength, stiffness, and impact resistance (
Table 4). Moreover, a representative curves of flexural testes were presented in
Figure S2.
The addition of seashells (PLA15S) resulted in a noticeable decrease in flexural strength from 108 ± 0.7 MPa (neat PLA) to 92.6 ± 0.35 MPa, representing a reduction of approximately 14.3%. Simultaneously, the flexural modulus increased by 7.7% to 3742 ± 68 MPa, indicating improved stiffness. However, the impact strength dropped significantly by 56.6%, from 17.94 ± 0.71 to 7.79 ± 0.35 kJ/m2. This behavior suggests that the rigid, brittle nature of the mineral filler increased the material’s stiffness but compromised its toughness, likely due to poor interfacial adhesion and stress concentration.
Similarly, the incorporation of eggshells (PLA15E) caused the flexural strength to decline by 17.3% to 89.3 ± 5.75 MPa, while the flexural modulus increased to 3939 ± 219 MPa—a 13.4% improvement. The impact resistance dropped to 8.75 ± 0.40 kJ/m2 (a 51.2% reduction). These results are consistent with the behavior of hard particulate fillers, which enhance stiffness at the expense of ductility and impact resistance.
The walnut-shell-filled composite (PLA15W) showed a flexural strength of 85.4 ± 5.95 MPa (20.9% lower than neat PLA) and a modest increase in flexural modulus to 3641 ± 206 MPa (4.8%). Interestingly, PLA15W retained relatively better impact strength (10.65 ± 0.51 kJ/m2), showing a smaller decline of 40.6%. This may be attributed to the fibrous structure of the walnut shells, which possibly promotes more effective stress transfer and energy dissipation, making PLA15W the most balanced composite in terms of mechanical performance.
In contrast, the coffee ground composite (PLA15C) exhibited the most significant deterioration in mechanical strength, with flexural strength decreasing by 45.1% to 59.3 ± 0.35 MPa. Nevertheless, this composite demonstrated the highest flexural modulus (4330 ± 53 MPa), a 24.7% increase, indicating strong stiffening capability. However, the impact strength dropped drastically to 6.08 ± 0.27 kJ/m2, a 66.1% reduction. This suggests that the porous and possibly agglomerated nature of coffee grounds introduces critical flaws that initiate early failure, severely impairing toughness.
In summary, the introduction of bio-based fillers into PLA led to increased stiffness in all cases, but at the cost of reduced flexural strength and impact resistance. Among the tested fillers, walnut shells offered the most favorable balance between stiffness and toughness, making PLA15W a promising candidate for semi-structural applications. In contrast, coffee grounds, while significantly enhancing stiffness, detrimentally affected overall mechanical integrity, highlighting the need for better filler dispersion or surface treatment strategies. These insights are valuable for designing sustainable, biodegradable composites for 3D printing applications where mechanical performance must be tailored to specific functional requirements.
3.3. Hydrolytic Degradation
Figure 6 and Figure 8 and
Table 5 show the mechanical results after hydroaging, and
Figure 7 displays the optical images of breakouts of samples before (left panel) and after (right panel) aging.
The incorporation of seashells into PLA (PLA15S) results in an initial tensile strength of approximately 43 MPa, which decreases to around 7.3 MPa after aging—a reduction of 82.88%. Although this represents a significant decline, it is lower than the degradation observed in neat PLA, suggesting that seashells may contribute to improved durability under hydrothermal aging conditions compared to unmodified PLA and other additives, except for coffee grounds.
In the case of PLA reinforced with 15% eggshells (PLA15E), the tensile strength drops from approximately 43 MPa to just 1.9 MPa after aging, corresponding to a 95.59% decrease. This pronounced degradation likely stems from the high porosity and poor interfacial compatibility between the mineral–organic filler and the PLA matrix, which accelerates structural breakdown under moist conditions.
The PLA composite with walnut shells (PLA15W) exhibits the most severe decline in mechanical performance. The tensile strength falls from about 30 MPa to just 0.45 MPa after aging, indicating a 98.5% reduction. This extreme deterioration is probably due to the high hygroscopicity of walnut shells and their weak interfacial adhesion with the polymer matrix, which promotes moisture uptake and microcrack formation.
Conversely, the PLA composite containing coffee grounds (PLA15C) demonstrates the highest mechanical stability after aging. Although the strength decreases from roughly 44 MPa to 16 MPa (a 63.64% reduction), it still retains the highest post-aging tensile strength among all tested materials. This suggests a favorable dispersion of coffee residues in the PLA matrix, potentially attributed to the stable lignocellulosic nature of coffee particles and their reduced susceptibility to hydrolytic degradation.
In summary, PLA15C appears to be the most promising formulation for applications exposed to hydrothermal environments, due to its relatively high retention of mechanical properties after aging. PLA15S shows moderate resistance, while PLA15E and especially PLA15W exhibit substantial mechanical deterioration.
The flexural strength of PLA-based composites reinforced with various natural fillers was assessed before and after accelerated aging to evaluate their mechanical stability over time (
Figure 8). The incorporation of seashells (PLA15S) resulted in a moderate initial flexural strength of approximately 90 MPa, which decreased by 50.00% after aging. This represents a substantial improvement in aging resistance compared to neat PLA, which exhibited a drastic 91.20% loss in flexural strength. Similarly, the addition of eggshells (PLA15E) provided limited benefit; the material retained only 13.66% of its original strength after aging, corresponding to a reduction of 86.34%. The use of walnut shell filler (PLA15W), however, significantly worsened aging performance. The flexural strength dropped by 98.15%, indicating a near-complete degradation of mechanical integrity, likely due to poor interfacial bonding or incompatibility between the lignocellulosic filler and the PLA matrix. In contrast, the coffee-filled composite (PLA15C) demonstrated the most promising performance, with a relatively high initial strength (~75 MPa) and the smallest reduction in mechanical properties (−27.40%). This enhanced stability may be attributed to the antioxidant compounds naturally present in spent coffee grounds, which could inhibit oxidative degradation during aging. Overall, coffee grounds emerged as the most effective filler for improving the long-term flexural performance of PLA composites, followed by seashells, eggshells, and finally walnut shells, which proved detrimental.
Figure 9 presents the water uptake behavior (a) and hydrolytic degradation kinetics (b) of neat PLA and its composites filled with various organic waste materials during 30 days of incubation in physiological saline solution, which are compared in
Table 6. The results reveal clear differences in water absorption capacity and degradation behavior depending on the type of filler used. Although gravimetric uptake methods offer a simple and rapid means of estimating diffusion coefficients, they are inherently coarse and subject to larger uncertainties compared to sorption or permeability techniques (e.g., dynamic vapor sorption methods and water vapor transmission rate measurements), which provide more accurate and direct quantification of mass transport [
48].
The most pronounced water absorption was observed for the PLA15C composite, which contains ground coffee waste. This filler is highly porous and rich in hydrophilic functional groups (–OH, –COOH), which promote rapid water uptake. A sharp increase in mass (~18%) occurred within the first 10 days, reaching over 19% by day 20. This indicates not only high water affinity but also the likely formation of microchannels at the filler/matrix interface, facilitating moisture penetration. The diffusion coefficient (D = 2.51808·10−12 m2/s) is the lowest among the tested materials, with a low R2 value (0.492) and high diffusional exponent (n = 0.2896).
In contrast, the PLA15S composite, containing shell powder derived from seashells (rich in chitin and chitosan), also showed increased water uptake (~2–3%), consistent with the hydrophilic nature of polysaccharides. However, the kinetic parameters (n = 0.2128, R2 = 0.933) indicate a more predictable diffusion process, likely governed by Fickian transport.
The PLA15E composite, filled with eggshell powder (primarily proteinaceous), exhibited moderate water uptake. Although egg-derived proteins such as albumins can bind water, the filler structure appears less porous than ground coffee, resulting in a diffusion coefficient (D = 7.1824·10−12 m2/s) comparable to that of neat PLA, implying a neutral effect on water permeability.
The lowest water absorption was observed in PLA15W, which contains walnut shell powder. This lignocellulosic filler has relatively low polarity and a fatty-acid-rich surface that limits water interaction. The low diffusion coefficient (D = 6.44628·10−12 m2/s) and higher R2 value (0.855) confirm that walnut shell addition leads to a reduced and more uniform moisture uptake, enhancing the hydrolytic stability of the composite.
These results are further supported by the degradation kinetics presented in
Figure 9b, where the evolution of log(M(t)/M∞) over log(time) reveals the fastest molecular weight decay for PLA15C, reflecting extensive hydrolytic chain scission. Conversely, the degradation profiles of PLA15W and PLA15E remain relatively flat, indicating slower polymer backbone cleavage and better resistance to hydrolytic degradation.
Overall, these findings demonstrate that the type and nature of organic filler significantly affect the water sorption and hydrolytic degradation behavior of PLA composites. Hydrophilic and porous fillers (e.g., coffee grounds, chitin) promote rapid water diffusion and accelerated degradation, while more hydrophobic or compact fillers (e.g., walnut shells) act as effective barriers, improving the long-term dimensional and chemical stability of the biocomposites. These insights are critical for the design of PLA-based materials intended for humid or aqueous environments.
3.4. Statistical Analysis
The mechanical performance of PLA-based biocomposites modified with natural fillers exhibited notable variability, as reflected in the standard deviations reported for tensile and flexural properties (
Table 7 and
Table 8). To systematically assess the dispersion of results and the reliability of observed trends, statistical analyses were conducted. To normalize variability relative to mean values, the coefficient of variation (
CV) was calculated by Equation (5):
Higher CV values were particularly evident in PLA15E and PLA15W, indicating a greater dispersion in tensile performance. This is likely due to poor filler–matrix connection, variable particle morphology, and inconsistent dispersion during processing. In contrast, PLA15S and PLA15C demonstrated low CVs (below 2%), suggesting better structural uniformity and reliable interfacial load transfer mechanisms.
The highest variability was observed in PLA15E and PLA15W, particularly in flexural strength (CV > 6%), likely due to filler agglomeration, inconsistent interfacial bonding, and morphological irregularities. Conversely, PLA and PLA15C demonstrated low CVs, indicating more homogeneous dispersion and reproducible mechanical behavior.
Low CV values indicate good filler dispersion quality and structural integrity of the composite, while high CVs may indicate processing problems or lack of interfacial compatibility. In particular, PLA15C and PLA15S composites showed the highest repeatability of results, making them more predictable candidates for structural applications.