Long-Term Clinical Study on Sandblasted–Acid-Etched Surface Dental Implants: 12-Year Follow-Up
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Sample Description
2.1.1. Demographic Distribution
2.1.2. Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria
2.2. Diagnosis and Treatment Plan
2.3. Clinical Protocol
2.4. Implant Characteristics
2.5. Follow-Up
2.6. Statistical Analysis
3. Results
4. Discussion
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Albrektsson, T.; Sennerby, L. State of the art in oral implants. J. Clin. Periodontol. 1991, 18, 474–481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Addy, L.D. An introduction to dental implants. Br. Dent. J. 2024, 236, 753–757. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Corbella, S.; Alberti, A.; Calciolari, E.; Francetti, L. Medium- and long-term survival rates of implant-supported single and partial restorations at a maximum follow-up of 12 years: A retrospective study. Int. J. Prosthodont. 2021, 34, 183–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- McGlumphy, E.A.; Hashemzadeh, S.; Yilmaz, B.; Purcell, B.A.; Leach, D.; Larsen, P.E. Treatment of edentulous mandible with metal-resin fixed complete dentures: A 15- to 20-year retrospective study. Clin. Oral. Impl. Res. 2019, 30, 817–825. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Simonis, P.; Dufour, T.; Tenenbaum, H. Long-term implant survival and success: A 10–16-year follow-up of non-submerged dental implants. Clin. Oral. Impl. Res. 2010, 21, 772–777. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Spitznagel, F.A.; Balmer, M.; Wiedemeier, D.B.; Jung, R.E.; Gierthmuehlen, P.C. Clinical outcomes of all-ceramic single crowns and fixed dental prostheses supported by ceramic implants: A systematic review and meta-analyses. Clin. Oral. Impl. Res. 2022, 33, 1–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Bäumer, A.; Toekan, S.; Saure, D.; Körner, G. Survival and success of implants in a private periodontal practice: A 10 year retrospective study. BMC Oral. Health. 2020, 20, 92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Branemark, P.I.; Breine, U.; Adell, R.; Hanson, B.O.; Lindstrom, J.; Olsson, A. Intra-osseus anchorage of dental prostheses. I. Experimental studies. Scand. J. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 1969, 3, 81–110. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Albrektsson, T.; Branemark, P.I.; Hansson, H.A.; Lindstrom, J. Osseointegrated titanium implants. Acta Orthop. Scand. 1981, 52, 155–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Schroeder, A.; van der Zypen, E.; Stich, H.; Sutter, F. The reaction of bone, connective tissue and epithelium to endosteal implants with sprayed titanium surfaces. J. Oral. Maxillofac. Surg. 1981, 9, 15–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Abrahamsson, I.; Berglundh, T.; Linder, E.; Lang, N.P.; Lindhe, J. Early bone formation adjacent to rough and turned endosseous implant surfaces. An experimental study in the dog. Clin. Oral. Impl. Res. 2004, 15, 381–392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Botticelli, D.; Lang, N.P. Dynamics of osseointegration in various human and animal models—A comparative analysis. Clin. Oral. Impl. Res. 2017, 28, 742–748. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hoque, M.E.; Showva, N.N.; Ahmed, M.; Rashid, A.B.; Sadique, S.E.; El-Bialy, T.; Xu, H. Titanium and titanium alloys in dentistry: Current trends, recent developments, and future prospects. Heliyon 2022, 8, 11300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nicolas-Silvente, A.I.; Velasco-Ortega, E.; Ortiz-Garcia, I.; Monsalve-Guil, L.; Gil, J.; Jiménez-Guerra, A. Influence of the titanium implant surface treatment on the surface roughness and chemical composition. Materials 2020, 13, 314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pellegrini, G.; Francetti, L.; Barbaro, B.; del Fabbro, M. Novel surfaces and osseointegration in implant dentistry. J. Invest. Clin. Dent. 2018, 9, 12349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Pereira, R.; Maia, P.; Rios-Santos, J.V.; Herrero-Climent, M.; Rios-Carrasco, B.; Aparicio, C.; Gil, J. Influence of titanium surface residual stresses on osteoblastic response and bacteria colonization. Materials 2024, 17, 1626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Wang, Q.; Zhou, P.; Liu, S.; Attarilar, S.; Ma, R.L.; Zhong, Y.; Wang, L. Multi-scale surface treatments of titanium implants for rapid osseointegration: A review. Nanomaterials 2020, 10, 1244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Velasco-Ortega, E.; Alfonso-Rodriguez, C.; Monsalve-Guil, L.; España-López, A.; Jiménez-Guerra, A.; Garzón, I.; Alaminos, M.; Gil, F.J. Relevant aspects in the surface properties in titanium dental implants for the cellular viability. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2016, 64, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Cho, Y.-D.; Kim, W.-J.; Kim, S.; Ku, Y.; Ryoo, H.-M. Surface topography of titanium affects their osteogenic potential through dna methylation. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 2406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Velasco-Ortega, E.; Fos-Parra, I.; Cabanillas-Balsera, D.; Olmos, J.; Pérez, R.A.; Gil, J.; Ortiz-Garcia, I.; Giner, M.; Bocio-Núñez, J.; Montoya-García, M.J.; et al. Osteoblastic cell behavior and gene expression related to bone metabolism on different titanium surfaces. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 3523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, G.L.; He, F.M.; Yang, X.F.; Wang, X.X.; Zhao, S.F. Bone responses to titanium implants surface-roughened by sandblasted and double etched treatments in a rabbit model. Oral. Surg. Oral. Med. Oral. Pathol. Oral. Radiol. Endod. 2008, 106, 516–524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Scarano, A.; Piattelli, A.; Alesandro Quaranta, A.; Felice Lorusso, F. Bone response to two dental implants with different sandblasted/acid-etched implant surfaces: A histological and histomorphometrical study in rabbits. BioMed Res. Int. 2017, 2017, 8724951. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Velasco-Ortega, E.; Ortiz-Garcia, I.; Jiménez-Guerra, A.; Núñez-Márquez, E.; Moreno-Muñoz, J.; Rondón-Romero, J.L.; Cabanillas-Balsera, D.; Gil, J.; Muñoz-Guzón, F.; Monsalve-Guil, L. Osseointegration of sandblasted and acid-etched implant surfaces. a histological and histomorphometric study in the rabbit. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 8507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, M.J.; Yun, P.Y.; Chang, N.H.; Kim, Y.K. The long-term evaluation of the prognosis of implants with acid-etched surfaces sandblasted with alumina: A retrospective clinical study. Maxillofac. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 2020, 42, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- van Velzen, F.J.; Ofec, R.; Schulten, E.A.; Ten Bruggenkate, C.M. 10-year survival rate and the incidence of peri-implant disease of 374 titanium dental implants with a SLA surface: A prospective cohort study in 177 fully and partially edentulous patients. Clin. Oral. Implants. Res. 2015, 26, 1121–1128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Buser, D.; Janner, S.F.; Wittneben, J.G.; Brägger, U.; Ramseier, C.A.; Salvi, G.E. 10-Year survival and success rates of 511 titanium implants with a sandblasted and acid-etched surface: A retrospective study in 303 partially edentulous patients. Clin. Implant. Dent. Relat. Res. 2012, 14, 839–851. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- General Assembly of the World Medical Association. World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: Ethical Principles for Medical Research Involving Human Subjects. J. Am. Coll. Dent. 2014, 81, 14–18. [Google Scholar]
- Smeets, R.; Stadlinger, B.; Schwarz, F.; Beck-Broichsitter, B.; Jung, O.; Precht, C.; Kloss, F.; Gröbe, A.; Heiland, M.; Ebker, T. Impact of dental implant surface modifications on osseointegration. Biomed. Res. Int. 2016, 2016, 6285620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kim, D.G.; Kwon, H.J.; Jeong, Y.H.; Kosel, E.; Lee, D.J.; Han, J.S.; Kim, H.L.; Kim, D.J. Mechanical properties of bone tissues surrounding dental implant systems with different treatments and healing periods. Clin. Oral. Investig. 2016, 20, 2211–2220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Schupbach, P.; Glauser, R.; Bauer, S. Al2O3 particles on titanium dental implant systems following sandblasting and acid-etching process. Int. J. Biomater. 2019, 2019, 6318429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Marenzi, G.; Impero, F.; Scherillo, F.; Sammartino, J.C.; Squillace, A.; Spagnuolo, G. Effect of different surface treatments on titanium dental implant micro-morphology. Materials 2019, 12, 733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Cervino, G.; Fiorillo, L.; Iannello, G.; Santonocito, D.; Risitano, G.; Cicciù, M. Sandblasted and acid etched titanium dental implant surfaces systematic review and confocal microscopy evaluation. Materials 2019, 12, 1763. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Velasco-Ortega, E.; Cracel-Lopes, J.L.; Matos-Garrido, N.; Jiménez-Guerra, A.; Ortiz-Garcia, I.; Moreno-Muñoz, J.; Núñez-Márquez, E.; Rondón-Romero, J.L.; López-López, J.; Monsalve-Guil, L. Immediate functional loading with full-arch fixed implant-retained rehabilitation in periodontal patients: Clinical study. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public. Health. 2022, 19, 13162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Velasco-Ortega, E.; Sierra-Baztan, A.; Jiménez-Guerra, A.; España-López, A.; Ortiz-Garcia, I.; Núñez-Márquez, E.; Moreno-Muñoz, J.; Rondón-Romero, J.L.; López-López, J.; Monsalve-Guil, L. Long-term clinical study of implants placed in maxillary sinus floor augmentation using beta-tricalcium phosphate. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public. Health. 2021, 18, 9975. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Gallucci, G.O.; Hamilton, A.; Zhou, W.; Buser, D.; Chen, S. Implant placement and loading protocols in partially edentulous patients: A systematic review. Clin. Oral. Implants. Res. 2018, 29, 106–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gallardo, Y.N.R.; da Silva-Olivio, I.R.; Gonzaga, L.; Sesma, N.; Martin, W. A systematic review of clinical outcomes on patients rehabilitated with complete-arch fixed implant-supported prostheses according to the time of loading. J. Prosthodont. 2019, 28, 958–968. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Chambrone, L.; Shibli, J.A.; Mercurio, C.E.; Cardoso, B.; Preshaw, P.M. Efficacy of standard (SLA) and modified sandblasted and acid-etched (SLActive) dental implants in promoting immediate and/or early occlusal loading protocols: A systematic review of prospective studies. Clin. Oral. Imp. Res. 2015, 26, 359–370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Körmöczi, K.; Komlós, G.; Papócsi, P.; Horváth, F.; Joób-Fancsaly, Á. The early loading of different surface-modified implants: A randomized clinical trial. BMC Oral. Health. 2021, 26, 207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Romero-Serrano, M.; Romero-Ruiz, M.M.; Herrero-Climent, M.; Rios-Carrasco, B.; Gil-Mur, J. Correlation between Implant Surface Roughness and Implant Stability: A Systematic Review. Dent. J. 2024, 12, 276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Monsalve-Guil, L.; Velasco-Ortega, E.; Moreno-Muñoz, J.; Núñez-Márquez, E.; Rondón-Romero, J.L.; Ortiz-García, I.; Nicolás-Silvente, A.; López-López, J.; Salgado-Peralvo, Á.O.; Jiménez-Guerra, Á. Clinical study with sandblasted dental implants: A 17-year retrospective follow up. Br. J. Oral. Maxillofac. Surg. 2024, 62, 191–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pommer, B.; Danzinger, M.; Leite Aiquel, L.; Pitta, J.; Haas, R. Long-term outcomes of maxillary single-tooth implants in relation to timing protocols of implant placement and loading: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin. Oral. Implant. Res. 2021, 21, 56–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Zhang, X.X.; Shi, J.Y.; Gu, Y.X.; Lai, H.C. Long-term outcomes of early loading of Straumann implant-supported fixed segmented bridgeworks in edentulous maxillae: A 10-year prospective study. Clin. Implant. Dent. Relat. Res. 2016, 18, 1227–1237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- French, D.; Larjava, H.; Ofec, R. Retrospective cohort study of 4591 Straumann implants in private practice setting, with up to 10-year follow-up. Part 1: Multivariate survival analysis. Clin. Oral Impl. Res. 2015, 26, 1345–1354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Arai, Y.; Takashima, M.; Matsuzaki, N.; Takada, S. Marginal bone loss in dental implants: A literature review of risk factors and treatment strategies for prevention. J. Prosthodont. Res. 2024; advance online publication. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Galindo-Moreno, P.; Catena, A.; Pérez-Sayáns, M.; Fernández-Barbero, J.E.; O’Valle, F.; Padial-Molina, M. Early marginal bone loss around dental implants to define success in implant dentistry: A retrospective study. Clin. Implant. Dent. Relat. Res. 2022, 24, 630–642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Schmid, E.; Roccuzzo, A.; Morandini, M.; Ramseier, C.A.; Sculean, A.; Salvi, G.E. Clinical and radiographic evaluation of implant-supported single-unit crowns with cantilever extension in posterior areas: A retrospective study with a follow-up of at least 10 years. Clin. Implant. Dent. Relat. Res. 2021, 23, 189–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Trombelli, L.; Farina, R.; Tomasi, C.; Vignoletti, F.; Paolantoni, G.; Giordano, F.; Ortensi, L.; Simonelli, A. Factors affecting radiographic marginal bone resorption at dental implants in function for at least 5 years: A multicenter retrospective study. Clin. Oral. Implants. Res. 2024, 35, 1406–1417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Şener-Yamaner, I.D.; Yamaner, G.; Sertgöz, A.; Çanakçi, C.F.; Özcan, M. Marginal bone loss around early-loaded SLA and SLActive implants: Radiological follow-up evaluation up to 6.5 years. Implant. Dent. 2017, 26, 592–599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Scarano, A.; Khater, A.G.A.; Gehrke, S.A.; Serra, P.; Francesco, I.; Di Carmine, M.; Tari, S.R.; Leo, L.; Lorusso, F. Current status of peri-implant diseases: A clinical review for evidence-based decision making. J. Funct. Biomater. 2023, 14, 210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Tenenbaum, H.; Bogen, O.; Severac, F.; Elkaim, R.; Davideau, J.-L.; Huck, O. Long-term prospective cohort study on dental implants: Clinical and microbiological parameters. Clin. Oral. Impl. Res. 2017, 28, 86–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Sinjab, K.; Sawant, S.; Ou, A.; Fenno, J.C.; Wang, H.L.; Kumar, P. Impact of surface characteristics on the peri-implant microbiome in health and disease. J. Periodontol. 2024, 95, 244–255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Pimentel, S.P.; Fontes, M.; Ribeiro, F.V.; Corrêa, M.G.; Nishii, D.; Cirano, F.R.; Casati, M.Z.; Casarin, R.C.V. Smoking habit modulates peri-implant microbiome: A case-control study. J. Periodontal. Res. 2018, 53, 983–991. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Haider, M.; Hashmi, M.S.A.; Raza, A.; Ibrahim, M.; Fitriyani, N.L.; Syafrudin, M.; Lee, S.W. Novel Ensemble Learning Algorithm for Early Detection of Lower Back Pain Using Spinal Anomalies. Mathematics 2024, 12, 1955. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ntovas, P.; Marchand, L.; Schnappauf, A.; Finkelman, M.; Revilla-Leon, M.; Att, W. Comparison Between Conventional and Artificial Intelligence-Assisted Setup for Digital Implant Planning: Accuracy, Time-Efficiency, and User Experience. Clin. Oral. Implant. Res. 2024, 21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, R.; Ma, J.T. Establishment of a nomogram model to predict the risk of peri-implantitis in patients with diabetes mellitus. Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue 2021, 30, 517–521. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Bonfanti-Gris, M.; Ruales, E.; Salido, M.P.; Martinez-Rus, F.; Özcan, M.; Pradies, G. Artificial intelligence for dental implant classification and peri-implant pathology identification in 2D radiographs: A systematic review. J. Dent. 2024, 153, 105533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Patient Description n = 114 (100%) | ||
---|---|---|
Type of Edentulism | Total | Partial |
n = 21 (18.4%) | n = 93 (81.6%) | |
Periodontitis History | Yes | No |
n = 18 (15.8%) | n = 96 (84.2%) | |
Smoking Habits | Smoker | Non-smoker |
n = 24 (21.1%) | n = 90 (78.9%) | |
Systemic Diseases | Yes | No |
n = 27 (23.7%) | n = 87 (76.3%) |
Implant Description n = 101 (100%) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Diameter | 3.5 mm 18 (5.9%) | 4 mm 156 (51.5%) | 4.5 mm 129 (42.6%) | |
Length | 8 mm 9 (2.9%) | 10 mm 192 (63.4%) | 12 mm 102 (34.7%) | |
Location | Maxilla 136 (44.9%) | Mandible 167 (55.1%) | ||
Area | Anterior 111 (36.6%) | Posterior 192 (63.4%) | ||
Percentage of Failure/Success | Preloading failure 3 (1%) | Preloading success 300 (99%) |
Prosthesis Type | Patients n = 114 (100%) | Implants n = 300 (100%) |
---|---|---|
Single crown | 48 (43.1%) | 87 (29%) |
Fixed bridge | 45 (39.5%) | 117 (39%) |
Full-arch fixed | 6 (5.3%) | 66 (22%) |
Overdenture | 15 (13.1%) | 30 (10%) |
Complication Type | + | − |
---|---|---|
Early Implant Loss | 3 implants (1.5%) | 300 implants (98.5%) |
Delayed Implant Loss | 9 implants (5.2%) | 291 implants (94.8%) |
Total Implant Loss | 12 implants (6.5%) | 291 implants (93.5%) |
Peri-Implantitis | 39 implants (11.8%) | 252 implants (84%) |
Technical complications | 30 implants (19.2%) | 222 implants (74%) |
Average marginal bone loss: 1.18 mm. (S.D. 0.64 mm.) |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Velasco-Ortega, E.; Pato-Mourelo, J.; López-López, B.; Monsalve-Guil, L.; Moreno-Muñoz, J.; López-López, J.; Núñez-Márquez, E.; Matos Garrido, N.; Rondón-Romero, J.L.; Jiménez-Guerra, Á.; et al. Long-Term Clinical Study on Sandblasted–Acid-Etched Surface Dental Implants: 12-Year Follow-Up. Materials 2025, 18, 183. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma18010183
Velasco-Ortega E, Pato-Mourelo J, López-López B, Monsalve-Guil L, Moreno-Muñoz J, López-López J, Núñez-Márquez E, Matos Garrido N, Rondón-Romero JL, Jiménez-Guerra Á, et al. Long-Term Clinical Study on Sandblasted–Acid-Etched Surface Dental Implants: 12-Year Follow-Up. Materials. 2025; 18(1):183. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma18010183
Chicago/Turabian StyleVelasco-Ortega, Eugenio, Jesús Pato-Mourelo, Borja López-López, Loreto Monsalve-Guil, Jesús Moreno-Muñoz, José López-López, Enrique Núñez-Márquez, Nuno Matos Garrido, José Luis Rondón-Romero, Álvaro Jiménez-Guerra, and et al. 2025. "Long-Term Clinical Study on Sandblasted–Acid-Etched Surface Dental Implants: 12-Year Follow-Up" Materials 18, no. 1: 183. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma18010183
APA StyleVelasco-Ortega, E., Pato-Mourelo, J., López-López, B., Monsalve-Guil, L., Moreno-Muñoz, J., López-López, J., Núñez-Márquez, E., Matos Garrido, N., Rondón-Romero, J. L., Jiménez-Guerra, Á., & Ortiz-García, I. (2025). Long-Term Clinical Study on Sandblasted–Acid-Etched Surface Dental Implants: 12-Year Follow-Up. Materials, 18(1), 183. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma18010183