3.1. Thermal Analysis of PBO Fiber
TGA was firstly conducted on cut-up PBO fiber to investigate its thermal behavior during the carbonization process. As is shown in
Figure 1, TG and the derivative of the TG (DTG) curves were obtained for PBO fibers heated up to 1300 °C under an inert atmosphere. The TG curve reflects the mass loss of the sample directly and the DTG curve is used to determine the mass loss peak. In this case, two peaks at 168.5 °C and 723.3 °C can be observed, which indicate that there were two main mass loss procedures during the whole process. Of note is that the second mass loss was much more rapid and more severe than the first one, which indicates that the pyrolysis reaction during the second mass loss was more violent than that during the first mass loss. Furthermore, the mass loss did not stop but went on at a fairly slow rate as the HTT went above 850 °C until the analysis terminated. One can infer that the mechanics of the pyrolysis reaction above 850 °C were different from those during the second mass loss.
Because the reaction during the second mass loss was the more complex one, further investigation had to be conducted. Thermal gravimetric analysis coupled with mass spectroscopy was used to examine the existence of several kinds of possible molecules evacuating from PBO fiber during the carbonization process. Due to the limitations of the equipment, the target temperature was set to 1150 °C. The results are shown in
Figure 2. It should be pointed out that the peaks existing in those graphs suggest the presence of certain kinds of particles in the outflow under certain temperatures. Here, the positions of all of the peaks were located in the range of 750–760 °C. It could be inferred that these peaks corresponded to the main mass loss of PBO with a minor and acceptable shift in the case of temperature.
Furthermore, the mechanism of the possible reaction during the carbonization of PBO fiber can be discussed regarding the structure of PBO’s polymer chain.
Figure 3 shows a monomer which is part of the structure of the PBO chain, and some of the chemical bonds are labeled from 1 to 6. As is mentioned above, the presence of HCN, NO, CO
2, benzene, and benzonitrile were confirmed in the outflow. Firstly, because benzene shows much better aromaticity than oxazole, the carbon atoms on the two benzene rings are steadier than those on the two oxazole rings. Therefore, it could be predicted that the origin of the carbon atoms in those small molecules is the oxazole rings rather than the benzene rings in the PBO chains. The homolytic scission of bond 1 and 4 would lead to the generating of a nitrile bond (C≡N), and the breaking of bond 5 could be one of the conditions of the emission of HCN. The generating of CO
2 requires the scission of bonds 2, 3, and 5, which would provide one carbon atom and one oxygen atom. In addition, it also needs one oxygen atom from the adjacent PBO chain. As for the generation of NO, it is certain that the scission of bonds 1 and 3 can provide N atoms and the scission of bonds 2 and 4 can provide O atoms. However, the N atom and O atom from those NO molecules seem not to originate from the same oxazole ring. If so, two radicals in the benzene ring and one carbyne-like radical would be generated with the scission of bonds 1 to 4, which requires massive energy and seems impossible. Therefore, it is believed that the NO molecules originate from the multi oxazoles. Finally, the origination of benzene and benzonitrile is more obvious than for that of the other molecules. After the break of bond 5 and 6, there still needed to be two hydrogen atoms from the adjacent PBO chain to form a benzene molecule. As for benzonitrile, bonds 1, 4, and 6 needed to be broken to generate its backbone.
Also, the molecules H2, C, NH3, and C2H2 were not expected in the outflow, but their existence can be discussed here. With the scission of bonds 3, 4, and 5, a single C atom may release from the chain structure along with the chain break. Considering the fact that PBO has a deficiency of hydrogen, H atoms in H2, NH3, and C2H2 molecules are not likely to originate from the same chain but may be generated from the interchain reaction. Otherwise, exceeding radicals would be formed in a monomer part of the PBO chain.
The emission of all kinds of small molecules surely leads to the rupture of the chain structure of PBO. However, some kinds of small molecules are surely generated from the interchain reaction, and the radicals generated due to the reaction may trigger the interchain reaction, which prevents further rupture of the fiber and could be the reason of the mass remaining being more than 50%. One could also infer that the emission of those molecules also creates the conditions for the formation of a graphite crystallite structure, which will be discussed later.
3.2. Mechanical Performance of PBO-Based Carbon Fiber
Since PBO fiber can sustain high temperatures during the carbonization process, samples of PBO-based carbon fiber were collected by a continuous method. The mechanical performance of each sample was then tested using an INSTRON 3345 universal testing system. The results are shown in
Table 1. It is demonstrated that tensile strength and Young’s modulus were affected greatly by HTT. Tensile strength reaches its minimum of 350 MPa at 750 °C. After that, tensile strength starts to increase until the HTT reaches 1100 °C. From that point, the increase in tensile strength is negligible. The situation is similar when it comes to Young’s modulus of the sample. Young’s modulus also reaches its minimum of 53 GPa at 750 °C and then increases to 130 GPa at 1100 °C. The severe decrease in mechanical performance implies that the pyrolysis reaction was vigorous at 750 °C, during which the rupture of the microstructure of PBO fiber took place, along with the emission of various molecules. Moreover, the slight increase in mechanical performance at higher temperatures may also prove that structural change occurred above 750 °C.
The PBO fiber could have undergone the carbonization process, with mechanical performance corresponding to that of general-purpose carbon fiber. Still, this was not ideal, since tensile strength and Young’s modulus of PAN-based carbon fiber can reach 2 GPa and 200 GPa, respectively. This kind of situation resulted from the change in microstructure of the material during heat treatment, which still needs further discussion. If the ladder structure in pre-oxidized PAN fiber is considered a chain, the carbonization of PAN fiber is a kind of interchain reaction. There is no doubt that this reaction leads to a large graphite-like structure, which is the main reaction during the carbonization process. When it comes to PBO, however, the reaction is quite complicated, with both intrachain and interchain reactions happening during carbonization. It is believed that these complicated reactions result in a ruptured carbonaceous structure unlike with what happens to PAN fiber, and this would be the reason why the mechanical performance of PBO-derived carbon fiber only meets the requirement of general-purpose carbon fiber.
3.4. Change of Microstructure of PBO Fiber during Carbonization Process
Diameters of all samples were measured and the results are shown in
Table 3. They indicate radial shrinkage during heat treatment. First, a decrease can be observed with increasing HTT. At 1400 °C, the diameter had reduced by 21.62% compared to that of the untreated fiber. Moreover, in the temperature range 750–1100 °C, the decrease was the most significant, which was consistent with the result of the mechanical study. The evacuation of the non-carbon elements could be the reason why PBO fiber shrank during heat treatment.
Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) was conducted on those samples and the images are shown in
Figure 4. The brightness of each image indicates the electrical conductivity of raw or treated fiber. It can be seen that fibers which were treated under higher temperature are brighter than those treated under lower temperature. Of note is that the brightness of the SEM image is determined by the electrical conductivity of the sample. Considering that the conductive coating can affect the conductivity as well as the morphology, the samples were not sprayed, leaving the conductivity unchanged. From these SEM images, increasing electrical conductivity can be observed with increasing temperature. Since the graphite-like structure can improve the conductivity of the material, it can be inferred that this kind of structure formed and developed due to high-temperature treatment, and was more developed when the HTT increased.
To study the change in the crystalline structure of PBO fiber during the carbonization process, XRD analysis was conducted on each sample respectively, and XRD patterns are shown in
Figure 5. Patterns of untreated, 700 °C-, and 750 °C-treated fibers show a typical (200) peak of PBO crystallite [
29], while those of the 800 °C-, 850 °C-, 900 °C-, 1100 °C-, 1300 °C-, and 1400 °C-treated fibers show a typical (002) peak of graphite crystallite [
30]. This could be evidence of structural transformation taking place in PBO fiber during the carbonization process.
Further information was acquired using Jade 6.5 software (Materials Data Inc., Livermore, CA, USA). Peak positions and full width at half maxima (FWHM) were obtained by a peak fitting process. Moreover, the interplanar distance and crystallite size were calculated by the Bragg equation and Scherrer formula.
In these equations, d (d200 or d002) is the interplanar distance of PBO or graphite crystallite; λ is the wavelength of Cu Kα1 (λ = 0.15406 nm); θ is the diffraction angle; L (L⊥200 or L⊥002) is the size in the direction perpendicular to the crystal face; K is Scherrer constant (K = 0.89); and β is the FWHM of the diffraction peak.
All of the results are shown in
Table 4. It is obvious that
L⊥200 increased from 5.263 nm to 8.924 nm with
d200 remaining almost unchanged when the HTT reached 700 °C. This could be evidence of heat-induced recrystallization which could increase Young’s modulus of the PBO fiber. However,
L⊥200 decreased dramatically with further heat treatment, and the (200) peak even disappeared when HTT reached 800 °C. This is evidence proving that the rupture happened in the PBO crystallite during heat treatment. The appearance of a (002) peak of graphite from 800 °C indicated that graphite crystallite was generated based on the broken structure of PBO crystallite. With a further increase in HTT from 800 °C,
d002 dropped slightly from 0.355 nm to 0.348 nm while
L⊥002 increased from 1.132 nm to 1.552 nm. The result still proves that heat treatment under higher HTT improves the structure of graphite crystallite.
Since the transformation of crystallite from PBO to graphite took place in the treated fiber, Raman spectroscopy was applied to further study the change in the degree of graphitization of those samples. Spectra of those samples except for the one belonging to the 650 °C-treated fiber are shown in
Figure 6. The spectrum of the 650 °C-treated fiber was not obtained because of the fluorescence effect during the analysis process. Still, the characteristic peaks of PBO at 930, 1170, 1290, 1305, 1540, and 1620 cm
−1 can be observed clearly in the spectra of untreated and 700 °C-treated fiber [
31]. From the spectrum of the 750 °C-treated fiber, it could be inferred that the transformation of the structure of crystallite in fiber was happening due to heat treatment. The rest of the spectra showed typical graphite peaks of a D peak (located around 1370 cm
−1) and G peak (located around 1595 cm
−1) [
32], which prove the appearance of the graphite structure.
More information was acquired from data analysis using Origin 2018 software. By a multi-peak fitting method, peak position and peak area were obtained. Furthermore, the area ratios of the D peak to G peak (
R) of 800 °C-, 850 °C-, 900 °C-, 1100 °C-, 1300 °C-, and 1400 °C-treated samples were calculated. The results are shown in
Table 5. The positions of both the D and G peaks almost stayed unchanged while the HTT increased, while
R’s value decreased slightly from 3.423 at 800 °C to 2.467 at 1400 °C. Since a lower
R suggests a higher degree of graphitization, the situation mentioned above suggests that a higher HTT led to a higher degree of graphitization during the carbonization process of the PBO fiber.