Next Article in Journal
Analysis of Important Fabrication Factors That Determine the Sensitivity of MWCNT/Epoxy Composite Strain Sensors
Next Article in Special Issue
Evaluation of the Environmental Impact and Efficiency of N-Doping Strategies in the Synthesis of Carbon Dots
Previous Article in Journal
Analysis of Strength Development and Soil–Water Characteristics of Rice Husk Ash–Lime Stabilized Soft Soil
Previous Article in Special Issue
Broadening the Photoluminescence Excitation Spectral Bandwidth of YVO4:Eu3+ Nanoparticles via a Novel Core-Shell and Hybridization Approach
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Materials
Volume 12
Issue 23
10.3390/ma12233874
materials-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Synthesis of Fe- and Co-Doped TiO2 with Improved Photocatalytic Activity Under Visible Irradiation Toward Carbamazepine Degradation

by
Abderrahim El Mragui
1,2,
Yuliya Logvina
1,
Luís Pinto da Silva
1,3,
Omar Zegaoui
2 and
Joaquim C.G. Esteves da Silva
1,3,*
1
Chemistry Research Unit (CIQUP), Faculty of Sciences of University of Porto, Rua do Campo Alegre 697, 4169-007 Porto, Portugal
2
Research team “Materials and Applied Catalysis: MCA”, “CBAE” Laboratory, Faculty of Sciences, Moulay Ismail University, BP.11201 Zitoune, Meknès, Morocco
3
LACOMEPHI, GreenUPorto, Department of Geosciences, Environment and Territorial Planning, Faculty of Sciences, University of Porto, Rua do Campo Alegre 697, 4169-007 Porto, Portugal
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Materials 2019, 12(23), 3874; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma12233874
Submission received: 23 October 2019 / Revised: 20 November 2019 / Accepted: 21 November 2019 / Published: 24 November 2019
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Luminescent Engineered Nanomaterials)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Pure TiO2 and Fe- and Co-doped TiO2 nanoparticles (NPs) as photocatalysts were synthesized using wet chemical methods (sol-gel + precipitation). Their crystalline structure and optical properties were analyzed using X-ray diffraction (XRD), Raman spectroscopy and Fourier-transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy, ultraviolet-visible light (UV-Vis) diffuse reflectance spectroscopy (DRS), and photoluminescence (PL) spectroscopy. The photocatalytic activity of the synthesized nanoparticles was evaluated through degradation of carbamazepine (CBZ) under UV-A and visible-light irradiations. The XRD and Raman analyses revealed that all synthesized nanomaterials showed only the anatase phase. The DRS results showed that the absorption edge was blue-shifted for Fe-doped TiO2 NPs. The decrease in charge recombination was evidenced from the PL investigation for both Co-doped and Fe-doped TiO2 nanomaterials. An enhancement in photocatalytic degradation of carbamazepine in aqueous suspension under both UV-A light and visible-light irradiations was observed for Fe-doped Titania NPs by comparison with pure TiO2. These results suggest that the doping cations could suppress the electron/hole recombination. Therefore, the photocatalytic activity of TiO2-based nanomaterials was enhanced.

1. Introduction

The contamination of water systems by pharmaceuticals is recognized as an environmental issue. Those pharmaceutical compounds are discharged from private households and hospitals and reach wastewater treatment plants. Many of these compounds cannot be fully removed by these plants and they are discharged in surface water, raising concerns about their potential ecotoxicological effects [1,2,3]. One of the pharmaceuticals frequently detected in the aquatic environment is carbamazepine (CBZ), also known as Tegratol and Epitol, which is a prescription drug used extensively in the clinical treatment of epilepsy, trigeminal neuralgia, and other psychiatric disorders [1,4,5,6]. Carbamazepine was detected in the environment with concentrations ranging from ng/L up to µg/L [1,7,8]. Despite its low concentration in the environment, CBZ is resistant to biodegradation and to conventional wastewater treatment processes, and it is retained in the environment for a long time. Given these facts, CBZ is classified as a persistent organic pollutant [9,10,11]. Its accumulation poses a threat to the quality of water resources, and it is suspected to pose a toxic effect on aquatic organisms [3].
Advanced oxidation processes (AOPs) were proven to be effective for the treatment of wastewater [1,12]. Among the various AOPs, heterogeneous photocatalysis is selected as one of the best options for the destruction of many recalcitrant organic pollutants including CBZ [12,13]. One of the most important aspects of heterogeneous photocatalysis is the selection of the photocatalyst. Currently, pure or modified titanium-dioxide nanoparticles are the most extensively used photocatalysts due to the optical and electronic properties of Titania, and their low cost, abundance, chemical stability, and non-toxicity [12,14]. Unfortunately, the photocatalytic efficiency of TiO2 is still not satisfactory under visible-light irradiation because of its wide band gap (Eg ≈ 3.20 eV) [15,16] that allows it to absorb only ultraviolet (UV) wavelengths, making TiO2 useful for wastewater treatment only in the ultraviolet range of sunlight, which greatly inhibits its industrial application [16,17,18,19,20]. Therefore, several studies focused on the development of visible-responsive TiO2 photocatalysts either by doping with metal ions and/or non-metal ions or by creation of hetero-junctions with other semiconductors [18,21,22]. Doping with transition-metal ions, such as Fe, Co, Mn, and Ni ions, was reported to be effective for enhancing the photocatalytic activity of TiO2 [22,23,24]. In fact in our previous studies, which included the effect of Mn, Co, and Ni mono-doping on TiO2 nanoparticles and the effect of co-doping with metal and non-metal ions, we reported that the mono-doping of TiO2 with Co and its co-doping with (P, Mo), (P, W), or (Si, W) improved the photocatalytic activity of TiO2 under visible-light irradiation, toward methyl orange, in comparison with undoped TiO2 [25,26].
Therefore, in order to continue our studies about the effect of doping with transition-metal ions on the structural, optical, and photocatalytic properties of TiO2 nanoparticles, the present study examines the effect of Fe doping on TiO2 nanoparticles, compared to Co doping and pure TiO2. The interest in the Fe3+ doping element is due to its cation radius Fe3+ (0.65 Å) being similar to that of the Ti4+ (0.68 Å) cation; therefore, doping Fe in a TiO2 lattice is allowed in principle. In addition, the Fe 3d electron configuration similar to that of the Ti atom can offer stability of Fe3+ [22].
According to our previous work [26], 1 wt.% Co was demonstrated to be the optimal dopant ratio to develop TiO2-based photocatalysts with improved photocatalytic activity toward methyl orange degradation and, thus, the same dopant ratio was used in this work for Co- and Fe-doped TiO2. To evaluate the photocatalytic activity of the prepared nanoparticles, carbamazepine was chosen as an organic pollutant. To our knowledge, there is a lack of studies in the literature concerning the photocatalytic degradation of carbamazepine using Fe-doped TiO2 nanoparticles as a photocatalyst. Moreover, 1 wt.% Fe-doped TiO2 is yet to be used as a photocatalyst in the degradation of carbamazepine. In this work, pure TiO2 nanoparticles, Fe-doped TiO2 nanoparticles, and Co-doped TiO2 nanoparticles were synthesized via wet chemical methods. The structural properties of the prepared samples were analyzed by X-ray diffraction (XRD), Fourier-transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy, and Raman spectroscopy, and the optical properties were investigated using UV-visible-light (UV-Vis) diffuse reflectance (DRS) and photoluminescence (PL) spectroscopy. The photocatalytic activity of doped and undoped TiO2 nanoparticles was evaluated under both UV-A light and visible-light irradiations, using carbamazepine (CBZ) as an organic pollutant.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Reagents

Titanium(IV) isopropoxide (TTIP, Ti(OCH(CH3)2)4); purity >99.99%)), isopropyl alcohol (purity 99.99%), cobaltous chloride hexahydrate (CoCl2, 6H2O; purity 99.99%), and iron(III) nitrate nanohydrate (FeN3O9, 9H2O; purity >98%) were purchased from Sigma Aldrich Chemicals (St. Louis, USA). Sodium hydroxide (NaOH; purity 98%) was purchased from Fisher Scientific International Company (Hampton, USA). Carbamazipine (CBZ, C15H12N2O; purity >98%) and acetonitrile (purity >99.5%) were purchased from Honeywell Reidel-de Haën TM (Bucharest, Romania). All chemicals were of analytic grade and used as received without further purifications.

2.2. Photocatalyst Preparation

The typical synthesis procedure of TiO2 and Co-doped TiO2 was adopted from our previous studies, in which pure TiO2 was prepared using the sol–gel method [18,25] and Co-doped TiO2 synthesis combined the sol-gel and precipitation methods [25]. As for Fe-doped TiO2 photocatalyst preparation, the TTIP (Ti(OCH(CH3)2)4) was slowly added dropwise to isopropyl alcohol at room temperature with a molar ratio of 25/1 isopropanol/TTIP, under continuous magnetic stirring; then, a certain amount of H2O (molar ratio of H2O/TTIP of 100/1) was added dropwise, and a white solution was obtained. Simultaneously, the required mass of the dopant precursor (Fe(NO3)3) to obtain 1 wt.% Fe in the final product was dissolved in distilled water under constant stirring. We proceeded by adding an aqueous solution of NaOH dropwise at 70 °C. After 90 min under the same conditions of heating (70 °C) and continuous stirring, the obtained solution was added dropwise to the white solution of TiO2, prepared as described previously. After 120 min of continuous stirring, the well-mixed solution was filtered and washed with distilled water and dried for 12 h in an oven at 100 °C. The obtained products were ground and annealed at 500 °C in air for 3 h.

2.3. Characterization

Powder X-ray diffraction measurement was carried out using an X’PERT MPD_PRO diffractometer (Malvern Panalytical Ltd, Malvern, United Kingdom) with Cu Kα radiation at 45 kV and 40 mA (λ = 1.5406 Å). Fourier-transform infrared (FTIR) spectra of the samples were recorded from 400–4000 cm−1 using an FTIR spectrometer type JASCO 4100 (Jasco International, Tokyo, Japan) and the KBr pellet method. The UV-Vis diffuse reflectance spectroscopy measurements were made on a JASCO V-570 spectrophotometer (Jasco International, Tokyo, Japan) equipped with a Labsphere DRA-CA-30I integration sphere, using BaSO4 as the reference. Raman spectra were collected at room temperature using a VERTEX 70 apparatus (Bruker Optics, Ettlingen, Germany) with 4 cm−1 of spectral resolution. The room-temperature photoluminescence spectra were measured with a Horiba Jovin Fluoromax 4 spectrofluorometer (HORIBA Scientific, Amadora, Portugal).

2.4. Photocatalytic Activity Experiments

The photocatalytic experiments were carried out at room temperature (26 ± 2 °C) in a Pyrex cylindric beaker (250 mL) containing 250 mL of a carbamazepine aqueous solution (9 mg/L) and 125 mg of photocatalyst. The photoreactor system was directly exposed to the light source in open-air conditions. After the establishment of the adsorption/desorption equilibrium between CBZ molecules and photocatalyst nanoparticles (60 min in the dark), the suspension was positioned at about 12 cm below the light source (UV-A or visible-light irradiations). In this work, to produce UV-A and visible-light irradiations, a low-pressure lamp (40 W, model Vilber, VL-340.BL, Eberhardzell, Germany) emitting UV radiation at 365 nm (light intensity ≈ 413 mW/cm2) and a commercial Feit White Compact Fluorescent lamp (23 W, cool daylight, 6500 K, 1311 Lumens, Mainhouse Electronic Co., Ltd, Xiamen, China) were used, respectively. During the reaction, samples (3 mL) were taken from the suspension and filtered through a 0.45-µm Millipore filter and then analyzed using a reverse-phase (RP) HPLC-diode array detector (DAD) chromatographic system. This system consisted of a Thermo Scientific SpectraSystem P1000 pump, a Rheodyne manual injection valve, a Hypersil Gold column (4.6 mm × 250 mm, 5 µm), and a Thermo Finnigan UV6000 LP diode array detector. The mobile phase consisted of deionized water and acetonitrile (v/v 40:60) at a flow rate of 1.0 mL∙min−1. The volume injected was 20 µL.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. XRD Analysis

Figure 1 presents the XRD patterns for pure TiO2 and doped TiO2 nanoparticles. These samples only exhibited patterns assigned to the TiO2 anatase phase (JCPDS file card No. 21-1272). No signal from the crystalline phase containing metal or metal oxide of the doping elements could be observed, which agrees with previous reports [25,27,28,29]. However, a decrease in the anatase peak intensity was observed for all samples and mainly for Co-doped TiO2 NPs, in comparison with undoped TiO2 NPs. Furthermore, careful analyses of the main peak (101) of the anatase (inset, Figure 1) indicated a slight shift to the higher angle side for Fe-doped TiO2 and mainly for Co-doped TiO2 NPs.
Based on this, and the results of a previous X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) study that revealed the coexistence of Co2+ and Co3+ on the surface of Co-doped TiO2 NPs [25], and by comparing the cationic radius values of Co2+ (0.74 Å), Co3+ (0.61 Å), Fe2+ (0.76 Å), and Fe3+ (0.65 Å) to that of Ti4+ (0.68 Å) [25,28,30,31,32], we hypothesize that some of the doping elements were incorporated into the structures of Titania and replaced the titanium ions, which induced a perturbation in anatase crystal structure; as a result, the crystallinity decreased and the peak position shifted. A similar behavior was reported in the literature [15,28,32,33]. The average crystallite size of the samples was estimated from the Full width at half maximum (FWHM) of the prominent peak (101) of anatase, using the Debye-Scherer method [34,35]. The obtained results in Table 1 indicate that the average crystallite size (D) changed after doping TiO2 either by Fe or Co. It was found that the crystallite size (D) diminished only by ΔD = 0.05 nm for Fe-doped TiO2 NPs, while it increased by ΔD = 0.33 for Co-doped TiO2 NPs.
In agreement with previous studies [14,36,37,38,39], we suggest that the Ti4+ cation was substituted by low-radius cations Co3+ (0.61 Å) and Fe3+ (0.65 Å), causing a decrease in d-spacing and shifting peak positions toward the high angle side. Due to the fact that Fe3+ has a cation radius value (0.65 Å) very similar to that of Ti4+ (0.68 Å) in comparison to Co3+ (0.61 Å), the replacement of Ti4+ by Fe3+ the in Titania lattice structure presented less impact on the crystallinity, peak position, and crystallite size of the TiO2 nanoparticles.

3.2. FTIR Studies

The FTIR spectra of the prepared samples are presented in Figure 2. The absorption band at 3420 cm−1 was attributed to the stretching vibrations of the O-H group adsorbed onto the surface of the nanoparticles, whereas the peak around 1650 cm−1 was attributed to the bending vibration mode for the adsorbed water molecules [26,39]. The Fe-doped TiO2 spectrum presented a weak absorption band at around 2340 cm−1, belonging to the stretching mode of CO2 molecules [39]. The band around 1398 cm−1 observed on the spectrum of pure TiO2 belonged to the bending vibrations of the C-H bond [28,39,40,41]. The low-frequency broad band located in the range 400–900 cm−1 corresponded to the Ti-O-Ti vibrational mode [39,42]. Interestingly, a shift of this band position to a lower wave number was observed for both Fe- and Co-doped TiO2 NPs, indicating the existence of structure defects [32,43]. In accordance with the XRD results, we think that this band shift was due to the formation of Fe-O and Co-O bonds, which occurred following the substitution of Ti4+ with Fe3+ and Co3+ within the TiO2 lattice. This sort of frequency shifting was also presented by other researchers [32,38,43].

3.3. Raman Studies

Raman spectroscopy is one of the most efficient analysis techniques to investigate the structural properties of materials. The changes in Raman spectra are related to non-stoichiometry, structure defects, phase changes, and bond modifications [18,32,40,44,45]. Figure 3 shows the Raman spectra of pure TiO2, Co-doped TiO2, and Fe-doped TiO2. All samples exhibited the six Raman active modes, Eg (145 cm−1), Eg (197 cm−1), B1g (397 cm−1), A1g + B1g (516 cm−1), and Eg (640 cm−1), characteristic of the anatase phase of TiO2 [25,27,40,46,47]. No Raman peak from the cobalt or iron was detected, which indicated that the analyzed materials consisted of pure anatase phase, reconfirming the obtained XRD results. Nevertheless, the Raman peak position of Eg mode at 145 cm−1 was slightly shifted toward a longer wave number, accompanied by a slight decrease in the intensity (inset, Figure 3). A similar behavior of Raman mode signals after doping TiO2 NPs with Co or Fe was elsewhere reported [14,29,48], and it is considered as a sign of structure defect existence, which resulted in the present study from the substitution of Ti4+ by Co3+ and Fe3+ within the lattice host. These Raman results agree with the literature and confirm those obtained by XRD and FTIR.

3.4. Optical Absorption Studies

The optical properties of doped and undoped TiO2 nanoparticles were explored using UV-Vis absorption spectroscopy analyses at room temperature. The recorded absorption spectra are shown in Figure 4a. The absorbance can vary depending upon some factors like particle size, oxygen deficiency, defects in material prepared, etc. [40,49,50]. It is clearly observed on the spectra that the absorption of doped and undoped TiO2 NPs was more in the UV region and less in the visible region. More importantly, Figure 4a shows a blue shift of the absorption edge for Fe-doped TiO2 and a red shift for Co-doped TiO2 nanoparticles, which indicated that the optical properties of TiO2 nanoparticles were affected by doping with Fe and Co.
The band gap energy of the prepared NPs was estimated using Tauc’s formula [39,40,51,52].
(αhν)2 = A (hν − Eg),
where α is the absorbance, and hν is the photon energy. The band gap energy was obtained by extrapolating the linear region of the plot (αhν)2 vs. (hν) to intersect the photon energy axis (Figure 4b). The estimated optical band gap (Eg) value for undoped TiO2 was ~3.12 eV, comparable to the value reported in our previous paper (Eg) of ~3.11 eV [26]. The red shift which occurred for Co-doped TiO2 sample was evidenced by its corresponding optical band gap value (Eg) of ~3.05 eV. These results indicate that cobalt doping helped to reduce the distance between the conduction band and valence band of TiO2, which could be favorable for photocatalytic reactions [17,23,53].
The Fe-doped TiO2 band gap energy was (Eg) ~3.32 eV, confirming the blue shift observed on the absorption edge spectra. Similar results were found by many researchers for other doping elements [40,49,54,55,56], and they reported this blue shift to be accompanied by a decrease in the crystallite size. Indeed, in the present case, the previously discussed XRD results revealed a shrinkage in the crystallite size for Fe-doped TiO2 nanoparticles. Thus, without neglecting other possible reasons for such a blue shift, such as the Burstein–Moss effect [49,55,56,57,58] or the crystal disorder resulting from the substitution of Ti4+ by Fe3+ [59,60], and in harmony with the XRD results and the literature, we think that the observed blue shift can be attributed to the well-known quantum-size effect [40,57,61,62,63,64,65].

3.5. Photoluminescence Studies

The photoluminescence technique is useful to study the separation and recombination of excited electrons and holes [30,66]. Therefore, all samples were characterized by PL. In this analysis, the excitation of all samples was done at 285 nm at room temperature, and the emission spectra were scanned between wavelengths of 325 and 500 nm; the results are shown in Figure 5. The undoped TiO2 PL spectrum shows a strong characteristic UV emission peak centered at 357 nm, which resulted from the band-to-band recombination process of electrons and holes [67,68]. This emission peak red-shifted to 362 and 363 nm in both Fe-doped and Co-doped TiO2 sample spectra, respectively, accompanied by an important decrease in intensity. Additional emission peaks centered on 465 nm and 466 nm were observed for Co-doped TiO2 and Fe-doped TiO2 nanoparticles, respectively, probably arising from oxygen vacancies trapping electrons [67,69]. These charge carriers are generally trapped by oxygen vacancies and surface hydroxyl groups, which contribute to their visible luminescence [67,69].
These observations evidenced that the optical properties of TiO2 nanoparticles were significantly affected, and it was suggested that doping TiO2 with Fe or Co may significantly suppress the electron-hole pair recombination [19,30,38,70,71], which can also be favorable for photocatalytic reactions [72,73].

3.6. Photocatalytic Performance

Based on the structural and optical properties of the prepared nanomaterials, it was expected that they would present high photocatalytic activity in comparison to pristine TiO2. To confirm this, experiments were carried out involving the photodegradation of CBZ under UV-A and visible-light irradiations for a period of 240 min. The degradation efficiency due to direct photolysis was also measured under the same experimental conditions as used for photocatalysis (with catalyst). As shown in Figure 6a and Figure 7a the carbamazepine percentage removal via the photolysis process under UV-A and visible light achieved only 9.90% and 3.6% after 240 min of illumination. These results indicate that carbamazepine is resistant to photolysis degradation under UV-A and visible light, and that the simultaneous presence of photocatalyst and light irradiation is necessary for the photocatalytic reaction.

3.6.1. UV-A Light Irradiation

Figure 6 shows the photocatalytic activity test results obtained for pure TiO2, Fe-doped TiO2, and Co-doped TiO2 under UV-A light irradiation. As it can be seen from Figure 6a and Table 2 that the performance of degradation of CBZ reached 96.9%, 34.21%, and 70.06% for 1 wt.% Fe-doped TiO2, 1 wt.% Co-doped TiO2, and pure TiO2 photocatalysts, respectively, after 240 min of UV illumination. These results indicate that the photocatalytic performance of TiO2 NPs was significantly improved after doping with Fe, as predicted by the PL results, and unexpectedly decreased when doping TiO2 with Co.
The reaction kinetics was further investigated using the Langmuir–Hinshelwood kinetic model, expressed by Equation (2) [57,74,75].
ln[C/Co] = −kapp × t,
where Co, C, t, and kapp represent the initial and time-varying concentrations of CBZ, irradiation time, and apparent kinetic constant, respectively. The plot of −ln(C/Co) versus irradiation time (min) yielded a linear relationship as shown in Figure 6b. The correlation coefficients (R2) were greater than 0.9 (not presented), and the model fitted well with the experimental data. The apparent first-order rate constants (kapp) were estimated from the slope of this linear plot, and they were found to be 0.01297 min−1, 0.00203 min−1, and 0.0067 min−1 for 1 wt.% Fe-doped TiO2, 1 wt.% Co-doped TiO2, and undoped TiO2 photocatalysts. The obtained kapp values indicated that the kinetics of carbamazepine photodegradation on Fe-doped TiO2 was two times faster than that of pure TiO2 and six times faster than that of Co-doped TiO2.

3.6.2. Visible-Light Irradiation

Figure 7 shows the photocatalytic activity test results obtained under visible-light irradiation for pure TiO2, Fe-doped TiO2, and Co-doped TiO2. The obtained results summarized in Table 2 indicate that 12.54%, 10.77%, and 7.88% from the initial concentration of CBZ was eliminated under visible-light irradiation in the presence of 1 wt.% Fe-doped TiO2, 1 wt.% Co-doped TiO2, and undoped TiO2 photocatalysts, respectively. The corresponding photo degradation kinetics was also investigated using the Langmuir–Hinshelwood kinetic model Figure 7b. The apparent first-order rate constants (kapp) were 0.00115 min−1, 0.00156 min−1, and (8.64 × 10−4 min−1) for Fe-doped TiO2, Co-doped TiO2, and undoped TiO2, respectively. The calculated kapp values reflect that the reaction kinetic of carbamazepine photodegradation over TiO2 nanoparticles was ameliorated after doping with either Co or Fe.
It is well known that the photocatalytic activity of photocatalysts is affected by a wide variety of factors such as the recombination of photogenerated charge carriers, the crystalline structure, the morphology, and the particle size of the photocatalyst [74,75]. In this work, in a clear way, the photocatalytic experiments results revealed a low CBZ conversion by pristine TiO2 under visible-light irradiation, which could be essentially due to its low absorbance of wavelengths above 397 nm (Eg = 3.12 eV). Therefore, the electron/hole (e−/h+) pairs, which play an essential role in photocatalytic reactions, cannot be photogenerated under visible-light irradiation. The results show also that, despite the low recombination rate of electrons and holes presented by the PL analyses and the band gap narrowing of Co-doped TiO2 nanoparticles, its photocatalytic activity under UV-A light compared to pure TiO2 remained below expectations. However, Co doping into the TiO2 nanoparticle lattice structure enhanced the photocatalytic performance under visible-light irradiation, via the formation of intermediate energy levels between conduction and valence bands that served as trapping centers for the photogenerated electrons.
The photocatalytic reaction experiment under both UV-A light and visible-light irradiations revealed an important improvement in the photocatalytic activity of TiO2 NPs after doping with Fe, which we believe might be ascribed to the high separation rate of electron-hole pairs. These results are in good agreement with those of the PL analyses and those reported in the literature [29,31,39,72]. Luu et al. [29], Asiltürk et al. [31], and Majeed Khan et al. [39] used Fe-doped TiO2 for the degradation of p-xylene, Malachite Green dye, and methylene blue, respectively. They reported that doping TiO2 nanoparticles with Fe3+ ion improved their photocatalytic activity. Lin et al. [72] found that 3.4 wt.% Fe-doped TiO2 synthesized by hydrothermal deposition showed an improved photocatalytic activity toward carbamazepine degradation as a result of enhancing the separation rate of photo-induced charge carriers by incorporating Fe in the TiO2 lattice structure.

4. Conclusion

To conclude, bare TiO2 nanoparticles, and 1 wt.% Co-doped and 1 wt.% Fe-doped TiO2 photocatalysts were successfully prepared via wet chemical methods. Both XRD and Raman results suggested that anatase was the only phase in the samples. Smaller crystallites were found in the Fe-doped TiO2 sample. The diffuse reflectance spectra of the samples showed a red shift of the absorbance edge for 1 wt.% Co-doped TiO2, and a blue shift was observed for the 1 wt.% Fe-doped TiO2 photocatalyst. From the PL plots, reduced intensity emission was observed in Co- and Fe-doped TiO2 nanoparticles, which implies an improvement in charge separation efficiency. Photocatalytic experiments revealed that the 1 wt.% Fe-doped TiO2 photocatalyst exhibited a stable and remarkably enhanced photocatalytic activity, when compared to bare TiO2 and 1 wt.% Co-doped TiO2 photocatalysts, toward carbamazepine degradation under UV-A irradiation (96.79% degradation) and under visible-light irradiation (12.54% degradation). The enhancement in photocatalytic efficiency could be due to the reduction of electron/hole recombination.

Author Contributions

A.E.M. and O.Z. synthesized the catalysts and performed the catalyst characterization. A.E.M. and Y.L. performed the photocatalytic activity tests. A.E.M. interpreted and analyzed the data and wrote the original draft. O.Z. supervised the work, provided manuscript writing assistance, and critically revised the manuscript for content. J.C.G.E.d.S. and L.P.d.S. supervised the work and reviewed the manuscript.

Funding

This work was made in the framework of the project Sustainable Advanced Materials (NORTE-01-0145-FEDER-000028), funded by “Fundo Europeu de Desenvolvimento Regional (FEDER)” through “Programa Operacional do Norte” (NORTE2020). Funding was also obtained via project POCI-01-0145-FEDER-006980, which was funded by FEDER through COMPETE2020. Luís Pinto da Silva acknowledges funding from “Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia” (FCT, Lisbon) under the Scientific Employment Stimulus (CEECIND/01425/2017).

Acknowledgments

Sincere thanks are extended to Moulay Ismail University (Meknes-Morocco) and “Centre Commun d’Analyse” (CCA at FMS-UMI) for the technical support and to the University of Porto, Portugal, for their support.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Mohapatra, D.P.; Brar, S.K.; Daghrir, R.; Tyagi, R.D.; Picard, P.; Surampalli, R.Y.; Drogui, P. Photocatalytic degradation of carbamazepine in wastewater by using a new class of whey-stabilized nanocrystalline TiO2 and ZnO. Sci. Total Environ. 2014, 485–486, 263–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Liu, Z.; Zhou, X.; Chen, X.; Dai, C.; Zhang, J.; Zhang, Y. Biosorption of clofibric acid and carbamazepine in aqueous solution by agricultural waste rice straw. J. Environ. Sci. (China) 2013, 25, 2384–2395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. He, Y.; Sutton, N.B.; Rijnaarts, H.H.H.; Langenhoff, A.A.M. Degradation of pharmaceuticals in wastewater using immobilized TiO2 photocatalysis under simulated solar irradiation. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2016, 182, 132–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Miao, X.S.; Metcalfe, C.D. Determination of carbamazepine and its metabolites in aqueous samples using liquid chromatography—Electrospray tandem mass spectrometry. Anal. Chem. 2003, 75, 3731–3738. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Teo, H.L.; Wong, L.; Liu, Q.; Teo, T.L.; Lee, T.K.; Lee, H.K. Simple and accurate measurement of carbamazepine in surface water by use of porous membrane-protected micro-solid-phase extraction coupled with isotope dilution mass spectrometry. Anal. Chim. Acta 2016, 912, 49–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Leucht, S.; Helfer, B.; Dold, M.; Kissling, W.; Mcgrath, J. Carbamazepine for schizophrenia. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2014, 2014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Kinney, C.A.; Furlong, E.T.; Zaugg, S.D.; Burkhardt, M.R.; Werner, S.L.; Cahill, J.D.; Jorgensen, G.R. Survey of Organic Wastewater Contaminants in Biosolids Destined for Land Application. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2006, 40, 7207–7215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Ferrari, B.; Paxéus, N.; Giudice, R.L.; Pollio, A.; Garric, J. Ecotoxicological impact of pharmaceuticals found in treated wastewaters: Study of carbamazepine, clofibric acid, and diclofenac. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2003, 55, 359–370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Donner, E.; Kosjek, T.; Qualmann, S.; Kusk, K.O.; Heath, E.; Revitt, D.M.; Ledin, A.; Andersen, H.R. Ecotoxicity of carbamazepine and its UV photolysis transformation products. Sci. Total Environ. 2013, 443, 870–876. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Zhou, H.; Liu, X.; Chen, X.; Ying, T.; Ying, Z. Characteristics of removal of waste-water marking pharmaceuticals with typical hydrophytes in the urban rivers. Sci. Total Environ. 2018, 636, 1291–1302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Jaria, G.; Silva, C.P.; Oliveira, J.A.B.P.; Santos, S.M.; Gil, M.V.; Otero, M.; Calisto, V.; Esteves, V.I. Production of highly efficient activated carbons from industrial wastes for the removal of pharmaceuticals from water—A full factorial design. J. Hazard. Mater. 2019, 212–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Carabin, A.; Drogui, P.; Robert, D. Photo-degradation of carbamazepine using TiO2 suspended photocatalysts. J. Taiwan Inst. Chem. Eng. 2015, 54, 109–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Wu, J.; Cagnetta, G.; Wang, B.; Cui, Y.; Deng, S.; Wang, Y.; Huang, J.; Yu, G. Efficient degradation of carbamazepine by organo-montmorillonite supported nCoFe2 O4 -activated peroxymonosulfate process. Chem. Eng. J. 2019, 824–836. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Kashale, A.A.; Rasal, A.S.; Kamble, G.P.; Ingole, V.H.; Dwivedi, P.K.; Rajoba, S.J.; Jadhav, L.D.; Ling, Y.-C.; Chang, J.-Y.; Ghule, A.V. Biosynthesized Co-doped TiO2 nanoparticles based anode for lithium-ion battery application and investigating the influence of dopant concentrations on its performance. Compos. Part B Eng. 2019, 167, 44–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Wan, H.; Yao, W.; Zhu, W.; Tang, Y.; Ge, H.; Shi, X.; Duan, T. Fe-N co-doped SiO2@TiO2 yolk-shell hollow nanospheres with enhanced visible light photocatalytic degradation. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2018, 444, 355–363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. D’Amato, C.; Giovannetti, R.; Zannotti, M.; Rommozzi, E.; Minicucci, M.; Gunnella, R.; Di Cicco, A. Band Gap Implications on Nano-TiO2 Surface Modification with Ascorbic Acid for Visible Light-Active Polypropylene Coated Photocatalyst. Nanomaterials 2018, 8, 599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Liu, J.; Li, Y.; Ke, J.; Wang, S.; Wang, L.; Xiao, H. Black NiO-TiO2 nanorods for solar photocatalysis: Recognition of electronic structure and reaction mechanism. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2018, 224, 705–714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. El Mragui, A.; Daou, I.; Zegaoui, O. Influence of the preparation method and ZnO/(ZnO + TiO2) weight ratio on the physicochemical and photocatalytic properties of ZnO-TiO2nanomaterials. Catal. Today 2018, 29–34. [Google Scholar]
  19. Niu, X.; Yan, W.; Shao, C.; Zhao, H.; Yang, J. Hydrothermal synthesis of Mo-C co-doped TiO2 and coupled with fluorine-doped tin oxide (FTO) for high-efficiency photodegradation of methylene blue and tetracycline: Effect of donor-acceptor passivated co-doping. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2019, 466, 882–892. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Raza, W.; Haque, M.M.; Muneer, M.; Fleisch, M.; Hakki, A.; Bahnemann, D. Photocatalytic degradation of different chromophoric dyes in aqueous phase using la and Mo doped TiO2 hybrid carbon spheres. J. Alloy. Compd. 2015, 632, 837–844. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Wang, E.; Yang, W.; Cao, Y. Unique surface chemical species on indium doped TiO2 and their effect on the visible light photocatalytic activity. J. Phys. Chem. C 2009, 113, 20912–20917. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Chen, J.; Qiu, F.; Xu, W.; Cao, S.; Zhu, H. Recent progress in enhancing photocatalytic efficiency of TiO2-based materials. Appl. Catal. A Gen. 2015, 495, 131–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Lv, T.; Zhao, J.; Chen, M.; Shen, K.; Zhang, D.; Zhang, J.; Zhang, G.; Liu, Q. Boosted Visible-Light Photodegradation of Methylene Blue by V and Co Co-Doped TiO2. Materials 2018, 11, 1946. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Ma, X.; Zhou, W.; Chen, Y. Structure and Photocatalytic Properties of Mn-Doped TiO2 Loaded on Wood-Based Activated Carbon Fiber Composites. Materials 2017, 10, 631. [Google Scholar]
  25. El Mragui, A.; Zegaoui, O.; Daou, I.; Esteves da Silva, J.C.G. Preparation, characterization, and photocatalytic activity under UV and visible light of Co, Mn, and Ni mono-doped and (P,Mo) and (P,W) co-doped TiO2 nanoparticles: A comparative study. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. El Mragui, A.; Zegaoui, O.; Daou, I. Synthesis, characterization and photocatalytic properties under visible light of doped and co-doped TiO2-based nanoparticles. Mater. Today Proc. 2019, 13, 857–865. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Ilie, A.G.; Scarisoareanu, M.; Morjan, I.; Dutu, E.; Badiceanu, M.; Mihailescu, I. Principal component analysis of Raman spectra for TiO2 nanoparticle characterization. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2017, 417, 93–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Adyani, S.M.; Ghorbani, M. A comparative study of physicochemical and photocatalytic properties of visible light responsive Fe, Gd and P single and tri-doped TiO2 nanomaterials. J. Rare Earths 2018, 36, 72–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Luu, C.L.; Nguyen, Q.T.; Ho, S.T. Synthesis and characterization of Fe-doped TiO2 photocatalyst by the sol-gel method. Adv. Nat. Sci. Nanosci. Nanotechnol. 2010, 1, 0–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Komaraiah, D.; Radha, E.; Kalarikkal, N.; Sivakumar, J.; Ramana Reddy, M.V.; Sayanna, R. Structural, optical and photoluminescence studies of sol-gel synthesized pure and iron doped TiO2 photocatalysts. Ceram. Int. 2019, 45, 25060–25068. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Asiltürk, M.; Sayılkan, F.; Arpaç, E. Effect of Fe3+ ion doping to TiO2 on the photocatalytic degradation of Malachite Green dye under UV and vis-irradiation. J. Photochem. Photobiol. A Chem. 2009, 203, 64–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Gaur, L.K.; Kumar, P.; Kushavah, D.; Khiangte, K.R.; Mathpal, M.C.; Agrahari, V.; Gairola, S.P.; Soler, M.A.G.; Swart, H.C.; Agarwal, A. Laser induced phase transformation influenced by Co doping in TiO2 nanoparticles. J. Alloys Compd. 2019, 780, 25–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Zhu, J.; Chen, F.; Zhang, J.; Chen, H.; Anpo, M. Fe3+-TiO2 photocatalysts prepared by combining sol–gel method with hydrothermal treatment and their characterization. J. Photochem. Photobiol. A Chem. 2006, 180, 196–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Khan, M.; Cao, W. Cationic (V, Y)-codoped TiO2 with enhanced visible light induced photocatalytic activity: A combined experimental and theoretical study. J. Appl. Phys. 2013, 114, 183514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Burton, A.W.; Ong, K.; Rea, T.; Chan, I.Y. On the estimation of average crystallite size of zeolites from the Scherrer equation: A critical evaluation of its application to zeolites with one-dimensional pore systems. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 2009, 117, 75–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Siddhapara, K.; Shah, D. Characterization of nanocrystalline cobalt doped TiO2 sol–gel material. J. Cryst. Growth 2012, 352, 224–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Dahlan, D.; Md Saad, S.K.; Berli, A.U.; Bajili, A.; Umar, A.A. Synthesis of two-dimensional nanowall of Cu-Doped TiO2 and its application as photoanode in DSSCs. Phys. E Low-Dimens. Syst. Nanostruct. 2017, 91, 185–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Choudhury, B.; Choudhury, A. Luminescence characteristics of cobalt doped TiO2 nanoparticles. J. Lumin. 2012, 132, 178–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Majeed Khan, M.A.; Siwach, R.; Kumar, S.; Alhazaa, A.N. Role of Fe doping in tuning photocatalytic and photoelectrochemical properties of TiO2 for photodegradation of methylene blue. Opt. Laser Technol. 2019, 118, 170–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Alamgir; Khan, W.; Ahmad, S.; Mehedi Hassan, M.; Naqvi, A.H. Structural phase analysis, band gap tuning and fluorescence properties of Co doped TiO2 nanoparticles. Opt. Mater. (Amst.) 2014, 38, 278–285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Wang, J.A.; Limas-Ballesteros, R.; López, T.; Moreno, A.; Gómez, R.; Novaro, O.; Bokhimi, X. Quantitative Determination of Titanium Lattice Defects and Solid-State Reaction Mechanism in Iron-Doped TiO2 Photocatalysts. J. Phys. Chem. B 2001, 105, 9692–9698. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Pirzada, B.M.; Mehraj, O.; Bhat, S.A.; Sabir, S. Efficient visible-light-driven Photocatalytic activity and enhanced charge transfer properties over Mo-doped WO3/TiO2 nanocomposites. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2018, 6, 3204–3212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Das, K.; Sharma, S.N.; Kumar, M.; De, S.K. Morphology dependent luminescence properties of Co doped TiO2 nanostructures. J. Phys. Chem. C 2009, 113, 14783–14792. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Kanmani, S.S.; Ramachandran, K. Synthesis and characterization of TiO2/ZnO core/shell nanomaterials for solar cell applications. Renew Energy 2012, 43, 149–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Fagan, R.; McCormack, D.; Hinder, S.; Pillai, S. Photocatalytic Properties of g-C3N4–TiO2 Heterojunctions under UV and Visible Light Conditions. Materials 2016, 9, 286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Zhang, W.F.; He, Y.L.; Zhang, M.S.; Yin, Z.; Chen, Q. Raman scattering study on anatase TiO2 nanocrystals. J. Phys. D Appl. Phys 2000, 33, 912–916. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Choi, H.C.; Jung, Y.M.; Kim, S. Bin Size effects in the Raman spectra of TiO2 nanoparticles. Vib. Spectrosc. 2005, 37, 33–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Garza-Arévalo, J.I.; García-Montes, I.; Reyes, M.H.; Guzmán-Mar, J.L.; Rodríguez-González, V.; Reyes, L.H. Fe doped TiO2 photocatalyst for the removal of As (III) under visible radiation and its potential application on the treatment of As-contaminated groundwater. Mater. Res. Bull. 2016, 73, 145–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Lu, J.G.; Fujita, S.; Kawaharamura, T.; Nishinaka, H.; Kamada, Y.; Ohshima, T.; Ye, Z.Z.; Zeng, Y.J.; Zhang, Y.Z.; Zhu, L.P.; et al. Carrier concentration dependence of band gap shift in n-type ZnO:Al films. J. Appl. Phys. 2007, 101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Fabbiyola, S.; Sailaja, V.; Kennedy, L.J.; Bououdina, M.; Judith Vijaya, J. Optical and magnetic properties of Cu-doped ZnO nanoparticles. J. Alloys Compd. 2017, 694, 522–531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Bakhshayesh, A.M.; Bakhshayesh, N. Enhanced short circuit current density of dye-sensitized solar cells aided by Sr, V co-doped TiO2 particles. Mater. Sci. Semicond. Process. 2016, 41, 92–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Dholam, R.; Patel, N.; Miotello, A. Efficient H2 production by water-splitting using indium–tin-oxide/V-doped TiO2 multilayer thin film photocatalyst. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2011, 36, 6519–6528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Shahzad, A.; Rasool, K.; Nawaz, M.; Miran, W.; Jang, J.; Moztahida, M.; Mahmoud, K.A.; Lee, D.S. Heterostructural TiO2/Ti3C2Tx (MXene) for photocatalytic degradation of antiepileptic drug carbamazepine. Chem. Eng. J. 2018, 349, 748–755. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Murugadoss, G.; Jayavel, R.; Rajesh Kumar, M. Systematic investigation of structural and morphological studies on doped TiO2 nanoparticles for solar cell applications. Superlattices Microstruct. 2014, 76, 349–361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Joshi, K.; Rawat, M.; Gautam, S.K.; Singh, R.G.; Ramola, R.C.; Singh, F. Band gap widening and narrowing in Cu-doped ZnO thin films. J. Alloys Compd. 2016, 680, 252–258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Kaleji, B.K.; Sarraf-Mamoory, R.; Fujishima, A. Influence of Nb dopant on the structural and optical properties of nanocrystalline TiO2 thin films. Mater. Chem. Phys. 2012, 132, 210–215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Rana, M.P.S.; Singh, F.; Negi, S.; Gautam, S.K.; Singh, R.G.; Ramola, R.C. Band gap engineering and low temperature transport phenomenon in highly conducting antimony doped tin oxide thin films. Ceram. Int. 2016, 42, 5932–5941. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Burstein, E. Anomalous optical absorption limit in InSb. Phys. Rev. 1954, 93, 632–633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Li, G.H.; Yang, L.; Jin, Y.X.; Zhang, L.D. Structural and optical properties of TiO2 thin film and TiO2+2 wt.% ZnFe2O4 composite film prepared by r.f. sputtering. Thin Solid Film. 2000, 368, 163–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. DeLoach, J.D.; Scarel, G.; Aita, C.R. Correlation between Titania film structure and near ultraviolet optical absorption. J. Appl. Phys. 1999, 85, 2377–2384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Vorontsov, A.V.; Valdés, H. Quantum size effect and visible light activity of anatase nanosheet quantum dots. J. Photochem. Photobiol. A Chem. 2019, 379, 39–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Iwamoto, M.; Abe, T.; Tachibana, Y. Control of bandgap of iron oxide through its encapsulation into SiO2-based mesoporous materials. J. Mol. Catal. A Chem. 2000, 155, 143–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Udayabhaskar, R.; Mangalaraja, R.V.; Sahlevani, S.F.; Perarasu, V.T.; Karthikeyan, B.; Contreras, D.; Gracia-Pinilla, M.A. Graphene induced band gap widening and luminescence quenching in ceria:graphene nanocomposites. J. Alloys Compd. 2019, 770, 1221–1228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Wang, Y.; Herron, N. Quantum size eSects on the exciton energy ofCdS clusters Ying. Phys. Rev. B 1990, 42, 7253–7255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Cao, J.; Nie, W.; Huang, L.; Ding, Y.; Lv, K.; Tang, H. Photocatalytic activation of sulfite by nitrogen vacancy modified graphitic carbon nitride for efficient degradation of carbamazepine. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2019, 241, 18–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Yu, J.; Yu, H.; Ao, C.H.; Lee, S.C.; Yu, J.C.; Ho, W. Preparation, characterization and photocatalytic activity of in situ Fe-doped TiO2 thin films. Thin Solid Film. 2006, 496, 273–280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. D’Amato, C.A.; Giovannetti, R.; Zannotti, M.; Rommozzi, E.; Ferraro, S.; Seghetti, C.; Minicucci, M.; Gunnella, R.; Di Cicco, A. Enhancement of visible-light photoactivity by polypropylene coated plasmonic Au/TiO2 for dye degradation in water solution. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2018, 441, 575–587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Choudhury, B.; Choudhury, A. Oxygen vacancy and dopant concentration dependent magnetic properties of Mn doped TiO2 nanoparticle. Curr. Appl. Phys. 2013, 13, 1025–1031. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Diak, M.; Klein, M.; Klimczuk, T.; Lisowski, W.; Remita, H.; Zaleska-Medynska, A.; Grabowska, E. Photoactivity of decahedral TiO2 loaded with bimetallic nanoparticles: Degradation pathway of phenol-1- 13 C and hydroxyl radical formation. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2017, 200, 56–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Srinivasulu, T.; Saritha, K.; Reddy, K.T.R. Synthesis and characterization of Fe-doped ZnO thin films deposited by chemical spray pyrolysis. Mod. Electron. Mater. 2017, 3, 76–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Jia, T.; Fu, F.; Yu, D.; Cao, J.; Sun, G. Facile synthesis and characterization of N-doped TiO2 /C nanocomposites with enhanced visible-light photocatalytic performance. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2018, 430, 438–447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Lin, L.; Wang, H.; Jiang, W.; Mkaouar, A.R.; Xu, P. Comparison study on photocatalytic oxidation of pharmaceuticals by TiO2-Fe and TiO2-reduced graphene oxide nanocomposites immobilized on optical fibers. J. Hazard. Mater. 2017, 333, 162–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Liqiang, J.; Yichun, Q.; Baiqi, W.; Shudan, L.; Baojiang, J.; Libin, Y.; Wei, F.; Honggang, F.; Jiazhong, S. Review of photoluminescence performance of nano-sized semiconductor materials and its relationships with photocatalytic activity. Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 2006, 90, 1773–1787. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Gao, T.; Chen, Z.; Zhu, Y.; Niu, F.; Huang, Q.; Qin, L.; Sun, X.; Huang, Y. Synthesis of BiFeO3 nanoparticles for the visible-light induced photocatalytic property. Mater. Res. Bull. 2014, 59, 6–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Akurati, K.K.; Vital, A.; Fortunato, G.; Hany, R.; Nueesch, F.; Graule, T. Flame synthesis of TiO2 nanoparticles with high photocatalytic activity. Solid State Sci. 2007, 9, 247–257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Materials 12 03874 g001 550
Figure 1. X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns of pure TiO2, and 1 wt.% Co-doped and 1 wt.% Fe-doped TiO2 nanoparticles (NPs). The inset shows the peak (101) of anatase.
Figure 1. X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns of pure TiO2, and 1 wt.% Co-doped and 1 wt.% Fe-doped TiO2 nanoparticles (NPs). The inset shows the peak (101) of anatase.
Materials 12 03874 g001
Materials 12 03874 g002 550
Figure 2. Fourier-transform infrared (FTIR) spectra of pure TiO2, and 1 wt.% Co-doped and 1 wt.% Fe-doped TiO2 NPs.
Figure 2. Fourier-transform infrared (FTIR) spectra of pure TiO2, and 1 wt.% Co-doped and 1 wt.% Fe-doped TiO2 NPs.
Materials 12 03874 g002
Materials 12 03874 g003 550
Figure 3. Raman spectra of pure TiO2, and 1 wt.% Co-doped and 1 wt.% Fe-doped TiO2 NPs.
Figure 3. Raman spectra of pure TiO2, and 1 wt.% Co-doped and 1 wt.% Fe-doped TiO2 NPs.
Materials 12 03874 g003
Materials 12 03874 g004 550
Figure 4. (a) Ultraviolet-visible light (UV-Vis) absorbance spectra of pure TiO2, and 1 wt.% Co-doped and 1 wt.% Fe-doped TiO2 NPs. (b) Tauc’s plot.
Figure 4. (a) Ultraviolet-visible light (UV-Vis) absorbance spectra of pure TiO2, and 1 wt.% Co-doped and 1 wt.% Fe-doped TiO2 NPs. (b) Tauc’s plot.
Materials 12 03874 g004
Materials 12 03874 g005 550
Figure 5. Photoluminescence spectra of pure TiO2, and 1 wt.% Co-doped and 1 wt.% Fe-doped TiO2 nanoparticles.
Figure 5. Photoluminescence spectra of pure TiO2, and 1 wt.% Co-doped and 1 wt.% Fe-doped TiO2 nanoparticles.
Materials 12 03874 g005
Materials 12 03874 g006 550
Figure 6. (a) Degradation rate of carbamazepine over pure TiO2, and 1 wt.% Co-doped and 1 wt.% Fe-doped TiO2 under UV-A light irradiation. (b) The reaction kinetics data.
Figure 6. (a) Degradation rate of carbamazepine over pure TiO2, and 1 wt.% Co-doped and 1 wt.% Fe-doped TiO2 under UV-A light irradiation. (b) The reaction kinetics data.
Materials 12 03874 g006
Materials 12 03874 g007 550
Figure 7. (a) Degradation rate of carbamazepine over pure TiO2, and 1 wt.% Co-doped and 1 wt.% Fe-doped TiO2 under visible-light irradiation. (b) The reaction kinetics data.
Figure 7. (a) Degradation rate of carbamazepine over pure TiO2, and 1 wt.% Co-doped and 1 wt.% Fe-doped TiO2 under visible-light irradiation. (b) The reaction kinetics data.
Materials 12 03874 g007
Table
Table 1. The peak (101) position, dhkl, and crystallite size of pure and doped TiO2 nanoparticles.
Table 1. The peak (101) position, dhkl, and crystallite size of pure and doped TiO2 nanoparticles.
SamplesPeak (101) Position 2θ (°)dhklAverage Crystallite Size (nm)
TiO225.290.987.45
1 wt.% Fe-TiO225.370.747.40
1 wt.% Co-TiO225.560.337.78
Table
Table 2. Band gap energy of TiO2-based nanomaterials and the photocatalytic degradation data of carbamazepine (CBZ) under ultraviolet (UV-A) and visible-light irradiation.
Table 2. Band gap energy of TiO2-based nanomaterials and the photocatalytic degradation data of carbamazepine (CBZ) under ultraviolet (UV-A) and visible-light irradiation.
SamplesEgapUV-A LightVisible Light
MO Removal (%)Rate Constant, k (min−1)R2MO Removal (%)Rate Constant, k (min−1)R2
TiO23.1270.060.00670.977.888.64 × 10−40.84
1 wt.% Fe-TiO23.3296.90.012970.9912.540.001150.97
1 wt.% Co-TiO23.0534.210.002030.9910.770.001560.81

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

El Mragui, A.; Logvina, Y.; Pinto da Silva, L.; Zegaoui, O.; Esteves da Silva, J.C.G. Synthesis of Fe- and Co-Doped TiO2 with Improved Photocatalytic Activity Under Visible Irradiation Toward Carbamazepine Degradation. Materials 2019, 12, 3874. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma12233874

AMA Style

El Mragui A, Logvina Y, Pinto da Silva L, Zegaoui O, Esteves da Silva JCG. Synthesis of Fe- and Co-Doped TiO2 with Improved Photocatalytic Activity Under Visible Irradiation Toward Carbamazepine Degradation. Materials. 2019; 12(23):3874. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma12233874

Chicago/Turabian Style

El Mragui, Abderrahim, Yuliya Logvina, Luís Pinto da Silva, Omar Zegaoui, and Joaquim C.G. Esteves da Silva. 2019. "Synthesis of Fe- and Co-Doped TiO2 with Improved Photocatalytic Activity Under Visible Irradiation Toward Carbamazepine Degradation" Materials 12, no. 23: 3874. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma12233874

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop