Next Article in Journal
Theoretical Basis for Switching a Kramers Single Molecular Magnet by Circularly-Polarized Radiation
Previous Article in Journal
Influence of Effective Water-to-Cement Ratios on Internal Damage and Salt Scaling of Concrete with Superabsorbent Polymer
Article

Semi-Empirical Prediction of Residual Stress Profiles in Machining IN718 Alloy Using Bimodal Gaussian Curve

1
School of Mechanical Engineering, Jiulong Lake Campus, Southeast University, Nanjing 211189, China
2
Shenyang Liming Aero-Engine (Group) Ltd., Shenyang 110000, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Materials 2019, 12(23), 3864; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma12233864
Received: 3 November 2019 / Revised: 19 November 2019 / Accepted: 21 November 2019 / Published: 22 November 2019
(This article belongs to the Section Manufacturing Processes and Systems)
Residual stresses are often imposed on the end-product due to mechanical and thermal loading during the machining process, influencing the distortion and fatigue life. This paper proposed an original semi-empirical method to predict the residual stress distribution along the depth direction. In the statistical model of the method, the bimodal Gaussian function was innovatively used to fit Inconel 718 alloy residual stress profiles obtained from the finite element model, achieving a great fit precision from 89.0% to 99.6%. The coefficients of the bimodal Gaussian function were regressed with cutting parameters by the random forest algorithm. The regression precision was controlled between 80% and 85% to prevent overfitting. Experiments, compromising cylindrical turning and residual stress measurements, were conducted to modify the finite element results. The finite element results were convincing after the experiment modification, ensuring the rationality of the statistical model. It turns out that predicted residual stresses are consistent with simulations and predicted data points are within the range of error bars. The max error of predicted surface residual stress (SRS) is 113.156 MPa, while the min error is 23.047 MPa. As for the maximum compressive residual stress (MCRS), the max error is 93.025 MPa, and the min error is 22.233 MPa. Considering the large residual stress value of Inconel 718, the predicted error is acceptable. According to the semi-empirical model, the influence of cutting parameters on the residual stress distribution was investigated. It shows that the cutting speed influences circumferential and axial MCRS, circumferential and axial depth of settling significantly, and thus has the most considerable influence on the residual stress distribution. Meanwhile, the depth of cut has the least impact because it only affects axial MCRS and axial depth of settling significantly. View Full-Text
Keywords: semi-empirical prediction; residual stresses; bimodal Gaussian fit; finite element method; Inconel 718 semi-empirical prediction; residual stresses; bimodal Gaussian fit; finite element method; Inconel 718
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Dong, P.; Peng, H.; Cheng, X.; Xing, Y.; Tang, W.; Zhou, X. Semi-Empirical Prediction of Residual Stress Profiles in Machining IN718 Alloy Using Bimodal Gaussian Curve. Materials 2019, 12, 3864. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma12233864

AMA Style

Dong P, Peng H, Cheng X, Xing Y, Tang W, Zhou X. Semi-Empirical Prediction of Residual Stress Profiles in Machining IN718 Alloy Using Bimodal Gaussian Curve. Materials. 2019; 12(23):3864. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma12233864

Chicago/Turabian Style

Dong, Penghao, Huachen Peng, Xianqiang Cheng, Yan Xing, Wencheng Tang, and Xin Zhou. 2019. "Semi-Empirical Prediction of Residual Stress Profiles in Machining IN718 Alloy Using Bimodal Gaussian Curve" Materials 12, no. 23: 3864. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma12233864

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop