Next Article in Journal
Preparation and Thermal Performance Enhancement of Low Temperature Eutectic Composite Phase Change Materials Based on Na2SO4·10H2O
Next Article in Special Issue
Solar Light Induced Photon-Assisted Synthesis of TiO2 Supported Highly Dispersed Ru Nanoparticle Catalysts
Previous Article in Journal
Preparation and Characterization of Phenolic Foam Modified with Bio-Oil
Previous Article in Special Issue
Photocatalytic Oxidation of VOCs in Gas Phase Using Capillary Microreactors with Commercial TiO2 (P25) Fillings
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Materials
Volume 11
Issue 11
10.3390/ma11112227
materials-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Effect of the Preparation Method (Sol-Gel or Hydrothermal) and Conditions on the TiO2 Properties and Activity for Propene Oxidation

by
Laura Cano-Casanova
,
Ana Amorós-Pérez
,
María Ángeles Lillo-Ródenas
* and
María del Carmen Román-Martínez
MCMA Group, Department of Inorganic Chemistry and Materials Institute, University of Alicante, E-03080 Alicante, Spain
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Materials 2018, 11(11), 2227; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma11112227
Submission received: 19 October 2018 / Revised: 5 November 2018 / Accepted: 6 November 2018 / Published: 9 November 2018
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Photocatalytic Materials for Energy and Environmental Applications)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Since the two most commonly used methods for TiO2 preparation are sol-gel (SG) and hydrothermal (HT) synthesis, this study attempts to compare both methods in order to determine which one is the most suitable to prepare photocatalysts for propene oxidation. In addition, this work studies how the concentration of the HCl used for hydrolysis of the TiO2 precursor affects the properties of the obtained materials. Also, the effect of avoiding the post-synthesis heat-treatment in a selection of samples is investigated. The photocatalysts are characterized by XRD, N2 adsorption-desorption isotherms and UV-vis spectroscopy, and the study tries to correlate the properties with the photocatalytic performance of the prepared TiO2 samples in propene oxidation. TiO2 materials with high crystallinity, between 67% and 81%, and surface area (up to 134 m2/g) have been obtained both by SG and HT methods. In general, the surface area and pore volume of the TiO2-HT samples are larger than those of TiO2-SG ones. The TiO2-HT catalysts are, in general, more active than TiO2-SG materials or P25 in the photo-oxidation of propene. The effect of HCl presence during the TiO2 synthesis and of the post synthesis heat treatment are much more marked in the case of the SG materials.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

The environmental legislation and related actions show an increasing concern in the elimination of undesired organic air pollutants like volatile organic compounds (VOCs). The removal of VOCs is a topic of great interest since they are very harmful for both the environment and human health, even at low concentration [1,2,3]. VOCs cause alterations in the nervous system and are a source of risk of cancer and genetic mutations [4]. Besides, they are precursors of photochemical oxidants, responsible for acid rain and climate change and take part in the destruction of the ozone layer [5]. Among the different VOCs, propene is object of research since it is present in vehicle emissions, in many industrial effluents, such as petrochemical plants, foundry operations and others, and it is one of the major sources of indoor air pollution, being one of the main components of tobacco smoke [6,7]. As VOCs are usually found at very low concentrations in gas effluents, the implementation of efficient removal techniques is difficult and costly. For this reason, research has been focused on treating gaseous emissions containing VOCs at low concentrations [8,9].
Photocatalysis is an interesting technique for the elimination of VOCs since, on one hand, it generally leads to complete mineralization of the pollutants and, on the other hand, it has the advantage of being applicable to low VOCs concentrations, in contrast to most techniques used to remove these contaminants, such as condensation, absorption or adsorption, that are normally used at higher VOCs concentrations [10,11,12,13,14]. TiO2 is one of the most studied photocatalysts because of its high chemical stability and resistance to photo-induced corrosion and because it is an abundant, cheap, not toxic and biocompatible material [15,16]. It can be used alone or forming hybrid catalysts, being one example the synthesis of Cu2O/TiO2 heterostructures recently reported [17]. However, TiO2 presents, as well, some drawbacks (low photoactivity under solar radiation, high rate of e−/h+ pairs recombination) and many efforts have been made over the last few years to overcome them and improve its efficiency [18,19,20,21].
Many parameters affect the photocatalytic oxidation of pollutants and both the photocatalysts’ properties and the process variables play important roles. The relative importance of these variables is often different depending on the application [16,22], although the vast literature survey performed remarks the importance of: the anatase content [23,24], the presence of small amounts of other crystalline mixed phases [22,25,26] and, especially, the porosity of the photocatalysts [27].
The synthesis method has shown to strongly determine the key physical and chemical properties of TiO2 photocatalysts [28,29,30,31]. There are several synthesis methods that differ in the degree of complexity and cost, and whose selection depends on the desired properties of the prepared TiO2, the available equipment, the experience of the research group and many others. However, simple, environmentally friendly and low cost methods are obviously preferred. The sol-gel (SG) method has been, up to know, the most widely used because of the low cost of the required equipment, the mild reaction conditions and also because, usually, TiO2 of high homogeneity and purity is obtained [32,33,34,35,36,37]. Although the hydrothermal technique is less used, it could also fit well these requirements and, because of that, it is recently receiving a lot of attention as a potential method for preparing highly crystalline TiO2 [28,38,39]. In both methods, the nature and concentration of the acid medium used to hydrolyse the titania precursors seems to play an important role in controlling the morphology and crystalline structure of the synthesized TiO2 [25,40,41,42,43,44].
In a previous work we faced the preparation of TiO2 photocatalysts by one-step hydrothermal synthesis (at low temperature and short time) using HCl of variable concentration as hydrolysis agent and avoiding the use of surfactants [45] (in contrast to many published works that include two steps and the use of surfactants and co-surfactants [40,41,46], or organic solvents, like n-hexane or cyclohexane [41,42,46]). The catalysts were thoroughly characterized, and especial effort was made to determine the TiO2 crystalline/amorphous proportion by means of quantifying the amount of the crystalline titania phases present. A detailed study of the textural properties and of the surface chemistry was also carried out. The obtained samples had relatively large surface area (100–135 m2/g) and high crystallinity (about 75–81%) and the proportion of anatase, brookite and rutile was influenced by the HCl concentration. The photocatalysts were tested in the low-concentration-propene oxidation and the influence of the catalysts’ properties on the photocatalytic performance was analysed [45]. An interesting conclusion was that most of the prepared TiO2 materials were more active for propene oxidation than the well-known P25 titania, being porosity and crystalline composition the two most influencing parameters for this application.
In order to determine if the sol-gel method can render TiO2 photocatalysts with the outstanding properties of the hydrothermal samples mentioned above, the present work focuses on the sol-gel preparation of an analogous series of samples. In addition and to complete the previous work, HT and SG samples have also been prepared without acid addition, and the effect of the post-synthesis heat treatment has also been investigated in selected samples. To extract valuable conclusions, all the materials have been characterized in detail and evaluated in the propene oxidation reaction. Thus, the final purpose of our study is to compare the catalytic behaviour of samples obtained in different conditions (preparation method, HCl concentration, post synthesis heat-treatment) for the photooxidation of propene at low concentration, keeping absolutely constant the reaction conditions. For this aim, the two critical features that the study must focus on are proper characterization of materials and evaluation of their photocatalytic activity [47].
Thus, basically, the objective of the present work is to analyse how the synthesis method and the acid medium affect the properties and activity of the photocatalysts. To the best of our knowledge, such a comparison in the same experimental conditions has never been reported before in the literature.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Materials

Titanium (IV) tetraisopropoxide (TTIP, 97%) was purchased from Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA. Absolute ethanol (C2H6O, 99.8%) and hydrochloric acid (HCl, 37%) were supplied by Panreac, Barcelona, Spain. All reactants have been used without further purification. The commercial titania P25 from Degussa has been used as reference photocatalyst.

2.2. Preparation of TiO2 Materials

TiO2 was prepared using procedures adapted from the sol-gel method described by Wang et al. [48]. The experimental conditions were chosen with the objective of preparing materials by a one-step synthesis method at mild conditions (low temperature and time) and avoiding the use of surfactants or solvents, such as n-hexane.
Two series of photocatalysts, with five samples each of them, were prepared by sol-gel and hydrothermal synthesis methods, respectively.
In both cases, a mixture prepared with titanium tetraisopropoxide (4 mL) and ethanol (20 mL) was stirred at room temperature, first magnetically (1 h) and then in ultrasonic bath (30 min). Then, a solution containing HCl ((4 mL) 0.5, 0.8, 1 or 12 M) and ethanol (10 mL) was added dropwise, and the mixture left under continuous stirring for 1 h. The synthesis was also performed without HCl, and H2O (4 mL) was added instead.
In the case of the sol-gel method, the product of the above described procedure was dried at 100 °C for 12 h. In the case of the hydrothermal synthesis, such a product was transferred to an autoclave and maintained at 180 °C for 12 h and, afterwards, it was dried at 100 °C for 12 h. Finally, both SG and HT samples were heated in air in a muffle at 5 °C/min up to 350 °C and kept for 2 h at this temperature.
The synthesized materials are named TiO2-XM-SG and TiO2-XM-HT to distinguish the samples prepared by the sol-gel and hydrothermal methods, respectively. In both cases, XM refers to the molar concentration of the hydrochloric acid solution used in the synthesis (0M is used for samples prepared without HCl). Note that the HCl concentration in the synthesis pot was approximately 10 times lower than the one of the added solution (i.e., if 4 mL HCl 12 M was used, considering that the total volume is 38 mL, the HCl concentration in the synthesis medium was 1.27 M).
Several samples (TiO2-0M-SG, TiO2-0M-HT, TiO2-12M-SG and TiO2-0.8M-HT) have been prepared twice to study the reproducibility of the preparation method. These samples have also been prepared avoiding the post synthesis heat treatment to analyse the effect of such treatment.

2.3. Characterization

The percentage of crystalline TiO2, phase composition and crystallite size were determined by X-ray diffraction (XRD) using the analysis method described in a previous work [45]. XRD patterns were recorded both for TiO2 samples and for mixtures of these samples with CaF2 (50%, w/w) using the equipment Miniflex II Rigaku (30 kV/15 mA) with Cu Kα radiation at a scanning rate of 2°/min, in the 2θ range 6–80°. The average crystallite size, referred to as crystal size, was calculated by the Scherrer equation (Equation (1)):
  B = K λ β cos θ  
where B is the average crystallite size (nm); λ is the radiation wavelength (0.1540 nm for Cu Kα), K is the Scherrer constant (K = 0.93), β is the full width at half maximum intensity (FWHM) and θ is the angle associated to the main peak of the studied phase (2θ values of 25.3, 27.5 and 30.8° for anatase (A), rutile (R) and brookite (B), respectively).
The porous texture was characterized by N2 adsorption-desorption at −196 °C in a volumetric Autosorb-6B apparatus from Quantachrome. The samples were previously degassed at 250 °C for 4 h. The Brunauer, Emmett and Teller (BET) equation was applied to the isotherms to get the apparent BET surface areas (SBET) and the Dubinin–Radushkevich equation was used to determine the total micropore volume (VDR N2, pores with size < 2 nm) [49]. The mesopore volume (Vmeso 2 nm< ø < 50 nm) was estimated as the difference between the volume of N2 adsorbed at P/P0 = 0.9 and P/P0 = 0.2, expressed as a liquid [49]. The total pore volume (VT) was determined from the volume of nitrogen adsorbed at a relative pressure P/P0 = 0.99.
The optical absorption properties were studied by UV-vis/DR spectroscopy (Jasco V-670, Pfungstadt, Germany, with integrating sphere accessory and powder sample holder). BaSO4 was used as the reference standard and the reflectance signal was calibrated with a Spectralon standard (Labsphere SRS-99-010, 99% reflectance).
The absorption edge wavelength was estimated from the intercept at zero absorbance of the high slope portion of each individual spectrum in the range 200–800 nm (absorbance method). Then, the band gap can be calculated [50] as:
  Eg = 1239.8 λ  
where Eg is the band gap energy (eV) and λ is the edge wavelength (nm).

2.4. Photocatalytic Oxidation of Propene

The experimental system used to perform the activity tests was designed in our laboratory and basically consists of a quartz reactor (AFORA, ∅ 1.5 cm) and a 365 nm Philips UV lamp (UV-A) placed parallel to the reactor at a distance of about 1 cm. The assembly reactor-lamp is surrounded by a cylinder covered by tinfoil. A scheme of this system is shown elsewhere [9].
In a typical experiment, 0.11 g of photocatalyst are placed on a quartz wool plug inside the reactor and, after purging with helium, a stream of 100 ppmv propene in air (30 or 60 mL/min (STP)) is passed through the reactor at 25 °C, being the outlet gas continuously analysed by mass spectrometry (Balzers, Thermostar GSD 301 01). After stabilization of the propene signal, m/z = 41, the lamp is switched on and when stationary propene concentration is achieved, the system is kept measuring for a period of about 3 h.
The experiments were repeated at least twice to check reproducibility. Propene conversion is calculated using the expression of Equation (3):
  Propene   conversion   ( % ) = C initial   C 3 H 6 −   C stationary   C 3 H 6   C initial   C 3 H 6 ×   100  
where CinitialC3H6 is the initial propene concentration, 100 ppmv, and Cstationary C3H6 is the stationary propene concentration reached after a certain time of irradiation.
Carbon dioxide and water produced during oxidation are followed by mass spectrometry, being CO2 quantified using a calibrated cylinder (300 ppmv CO2 in helium). A mass scan revealed that CO2 is the only oxidation product.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Characterization of TiO2 Samples

3.1.1. XRD Analysis

The characteristic XRD peaks of the different TiO2 phases appear at the following 2θ values [51,52,53]:
-
Anatase: 25.3° (101), 37.8° (004), 48.0° (200), 54.5° (105), 55.0° (211), 62.7° (204), 70.4° (116) and 74.5° (220).
-
Brookite: 25.3° (120), 25.7° (111) and 30.8° (121).
-
Rutile: 27.5° (110), 36.1° (101) and 54.4° (211).
These data indicate that the main diffraction peak of anatase (101) overlaps with the (120) and (111) peaks of brookite.
Figure 1 shows the XRD patterns obtained for the synthesized TiO2 samples, where it can be observed that samples TiO2-0.8M, TiO2-1M and TiO2-5M, both SG and HT, contain anatase, brookite and rutile; sample TiO2-12M-SG only contains anatase and sample TiO2-12M-HT contains anatase and brookite. The samples prepared without HCl (both SG and HT) contain, as well, only anatase.
The characterization of crystalline and amorphous TiO2 has been object of great interest in the recent literature devoted to photocatalysis [54,55,56,57,58]. In the present work, the method proposed by Cano-Casanova et al. [45] has been selected for crystalline/amorphous characterization considering the multiphasic nature and the presence of brookite in most photocatalysts. The parameters calculated from the XRD data of Figure 1, amount (in wt.%) of the different TiO2 crystalline phases, amorphous TiO2 fraction (in wt.%) and average crystal size of each crystalline phase are graphically presented in Figure 2 (and also in Table S1, see Supplementary Information).
The proportion of amorphous phase determined for P25 titania (13%) is similar to that found in the literature [56,59,60,61], what supports the reliability of the analysis carried out.
Figure 2 shows that the content of amorphous TiO2 in most of the prepared samples ranges between 19% and 26% (see Table S1), which indicates that, in general, the preparation method and HCl concentration do not significantly affect the degree of crystallinity reached. Only in sample TiO2-0M-SG the content of amorphous TiO2 is slightly higher, 33%, and it must be mentioned that this sample is grey coloured, in contrast to the rest of samples that are white (see Figure S1 in the Supplementary Information). This result seems to indicate that, although both methods render TiO2 with a crystallinity degree above 65%, the presence of HCl is necessary in the sol-gel one to enhance crystallization. However, under hydrothermal conditions (180 °C, 12 h) the crystallization process is more controlled and the absence of HCl is less significant.
As mentioned above, TiO2-0M-SG sample only contains anatase (Figure 2) and when HCl 0.8M, 1M or 5M are used in the synthesis, the amount of anatase decreases and brookite and rutile phases appear. The proportion of the three phases varies with the concentration of the HCl used, being TiO2-1M-SG the sample with the largest amount of brookite and rutile. It should be pointed out that the only crystalline phase in sample TiO2-12M-SG is anatase, as in TiO2-0M-SG, and the anatase content is the highest.
In the HT series, also the TiO2-0M-HT sample contains only anatase, whereas when 0.8M, 1M or 5M HCl are used in the synthesis, the amount of anatase decreases and brookite and rutile phases appear (Figure 2). However, in contrast with the SG series, catalyst TiO2-12M-HT contains a mixture of anatase and brookite. In this case, samples TiO2-5M-HT and TiO2-0M-HT are those with the lowest and the highest anatase content, respectively.
Figure 2 shows that TiO2-5M-HT and TiO2-1M-SG samples have some similarities, being these two photocatalysts those containing the highest proportion of brookite and rutile. In addition, data show that both, the presence of HCl and its concentration in the synthesis pot, influence the development of the titania crystalline phases, being this effect different for the two preparation methods. The HT method allows to obtain higher anatase content using low-concentrated HCl, while a pure anatase sample is obtained by sol-gel method using 12 M HCl. It should also be highlighted that the anatase content in samples TiO2-12M-SG and TiO2-0M-HT is higher than in P25 titania (Figure 2).
In general, the hydrothermal method leads to more crystalline samples, with a slightly larger average crystal size, than the sol-gel one.
The average crystal size (Figure 2 and Table S1) of all the crystalline phases in the two series of samples slightly increases with increasing the HCl concentration used in the synthesis. The anatase crystal size is larger in samples synthesized without HCl, with the exception of sample TiO2-12M-SG.

3.1.2. Textural Properties

Figure 3 shows the N2 adsorption-desorption isotherms of all synthesized materials. It can be observed that they present type IV isotherms according to the International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry (IUPAC) classification [62], associated with mesoporous solids, and that the HCl concentration influences the textural properties.
Table 1 presents the textural properties of TiO2-XM-SG and TiO2-XM-HT samples and of P25 titania. The procedure used to calculate the parameters has been described in the characterization section and reproducibility has been tested in several samples. Results in Table 1 show that the surface areas of the SG samples are slightly lower than those of HT samples (34 to 120 m2/g vs. 100 to 134 m2/g) and all prepared materials have larger surface area than P25, with the exception of sample TiO2-0M-SG. It has been confirmed that the low surface area of sample TiO2-0M-SG is a reproducible result.
Samples of both series, excepting TiO2-0M-SG, have similar micropore volumes (VDR N2), between 0.03 and 0.05 cm3/g, but a significant difference is observed in the mesopore volumes. The Vmeso values of TiO2-XM-HT materials are more than twice those of the TiO2-XM-SG materials (0.20–0.29 cm3/g vs. 0.07–0.10 cm3/g). As a consequence, this important difference is also observed in the total pore volume (Table 1).
In the SG series there is no clear relationship between the specific surface area and the concentration of the acid used in TiO2 synthesis while, in general, the surface area of the HT photocatalysts decreases when the HCl concentration increases (only sample TiO2-12M-HT does not follow the trend).
A plot of the BET surface area versus the amount of amorphous titania (Figure 4) shows an acceptable positive slope linear trend, in which sample TiO2-0M-SG constitutes a clear exception (red circle). Data in Figure 4 also show that, for a similar amount of amorphous phase, the HT samples have higher surface area. Thus, although both methods render TiO2 with acceptable crystallinity, these results seem to indicate that in absence of acid, hydrolysis-condensation reactions occur easily during the HT synthesis, while in the SG method the presence of acid is necessary to obtain samples with high surface area because of the role of HCl as catalyst for the alkoxide hydrolysis in these conditions [40,41,42,63].
Attention should also be paid to the relationship between surface area and phase composition. As reported in the literature, higher brookite and rutile contents result in smaller surface areas [64,65]. This could explain the differences in the specific surface area of samples TiO2-0.8M-SG and TiO2-1M-SG (108 and 89 m2/g, respectively, with 18% B and 11% R versus 13% B and 8% R, (Table S1 and Figure 2)). Analogously, the larger specific surface area of TiO2-5M-SG (118 m2/g) would be related to its lower brookite and rutile content (9% B and 2% R). Although sample TiO2-12M-SG does not contain neither brookite nor rutile, its surface area is lower than that of sample TiO2-5M-SG, what can be explained considering that the former has larger anatase crystal size, which is consistent with a smaller surface area [66].
In the HT series, the low specific surface area of sample TiO2-5M-HT can be attributed to its high brookite and rutile content. The difference in the surface area of TiO2-0.8M-HT and TiO2-1M-HT samples (134 versus 116 m2/g), which have similar phase composition, can be attributed to the higher crystallinity of the second one. The surface area of TiO2-12M-HT is lower than expected considering its phase composition, which must be a consequence of its relatively large mean crystal size. This can be also the case of TiO2-0M-HT sample, that contains anatase (78%), but presents slightly lower surface area than that of TiO2-0.8M-HT (60% A, 16% B, 1% R). It should be again highlighted that, in absence of acid, the experimental conditions of the HT method are sufficient for TiO2 to be properly synthesized-crystallized.
Comparing the textural properties of samples prepared by SG and HT methods, it can be concluded that, in general, the second one allows obtaining TiO2 with larger surface aresa and pore volumes.

3.1.3. Determination of the Band Gap Energy

Table 2 contains the values of the energy band gap (Eg) determined for all the photocatalysts as explained in the characterization section. The energy band gap values of the three titania crystalline phases reported in the literature (determined also by the absorbance method (see the experimental section)) are 3.20, 3.15 and 3.00 eV for anatase, brookite and rutile, respectively [65,66].
In general, data in Table 2 show that Eg values of samples that only contain anatase (TiO2-0M-SG, TiO2-12M SG and TiO2-0M-HT) are lower than the one reported for pure anatase [65]. This could be explained considering that these materials contain a certain percentage of amorphous phase, in the range of 20–33% [67,68]. This can also affect the Eg values of the other samples. For instance, the Eg values of TiO2-0.8M-SG, TiO2-1M-SG and TiO2-5M-SG samples, containing anatase, brookite and rutile (see Figure 2 and Table S1), are relatively close to each other (2.92, 2.80 and 2.95 eV, respectively), but also clearly lower than those indicated above for the pure phases (even considering the proportion of each of them in the sample). Apart from the potential effect of the amorphous titania, the interaction between phases could lead to the modification of the photocatalysts’ band structures [40]. For example, the lowest Eg value corresponds to TiO2-1M-SG, which has the largest brookite and rutile contribution.
The same happens in the case of analogous samples of the HT series. Samples TiO2-0.8-HT and TiO2-1M-HT, which have the same Eg value, have a very similar phase distribution (Figure 2 and Table S1) and, again, the lower Eg value corresponds to the sample with the highest content of brookite and rutile (TiO2-5M-HT). Finally, TiO2-12M-HT sample, that contains anatase and a small proportion of brookite, shows the highest Eg value, 3.15 eV, almost the same as the sample composed of pure anatase, indicating that the effect of brookite is less important than that of rutile.
Figure 5 shows the plot of Eg (eV) versus the anatase content (%), Figure 5a, or versus the rutile or brookite content, Figure 5b, for TiO2-XM-SG and TiO2-XM-HT samples. In general, the obtained data show that the Eg values seem to be directly related with the anatase contribution. Therefore, samples with similar anatase contents show similar energy band gap values. In the case of rutile/brookite phase contents, the increase in the contribution of either rutile or brookite leads to Eg decrease, although the trend seems to be less linear than in the case of anatase.
These data show that the optical properties of the synthesized materials are very similar to those obtained for the reference P25 titania. The variation found in the Eg values between samples within the respective series of samples (SG and HT) seems to be determined by the phase distribution, the anatase content and the presence of amorphous TiO2 [40]. Finally, comparing samples prepared with the same HCl concentration by the two methods, it can be concluded that there are no significant differences in their optical properties.

3.2. Photocatalytic Activity

Figure 6 shows propene conversion data obtained with the SG and HT catalysts and with P25 in experiments carried out with two gas flow rates (30 and 60 mL/min). In general, the same trend in the conversion values is observed for both flow rates, which can be considered as an indication of the reproducible behaviour of these photocatalysts. As expected, propene conversion is higher when the gas flow is lower (the contact time is larger and/or the amount of propene molecules to be oxidized per unit of time is lower).
The carbon balance (propene consumed and CO2 formed) confirms that total mineralization of oxidized propene takes place, according to the following reaction and to the literature [9,69]:
2C3H6 + 9O2 → 6CO2 + 6H2O
Data in Figure 6 show that the SG photocatalysts are less active than P25, while most of the HT samples are more active than the commercial titania and, thus, more active than the analogous SG photocatalysts.
The activity order in the SG series is the following: TiO2-5M-SG > TiO2-12M-SG > TiO2-0.8M-SG > TiO2-1M-SG > TiO2-0M-SG. Conversion values and the main properties of SG samples have been plotted in Figure 7.
In general, Figure 7 shows that the activity trend correlates very well with the values of the BET surface, and less markedly with the amount of anatase. For example, the high activity of sample TiO2-5M-SG may be explained considering that it has the largest surface area, a high anatase content and small brookite and rutile contents. Thus, the increase in surface area influences positively the activity, and the higher the anatase content and the lower the brookite and rutile contents, the higher the photocatalytic activity obtained. TiO2-0M-SG sample shows the lowest propene conversion, which is consistent with its much lower surface area, although it has a relatively high anatase content.
In the HT series the order of activity is the following: TiO2-0.8M-HT > TiO2-12M-HT > TiO2-1M-HT > TiO2-0M-HT > TiO2-5M-HT, being TiO2-0.8M-HT, TiO2-12M-HT and TiO2-1M-HT more active than P25. As explained in our previous work [45], and as it happens in the case of SG samples, the trend in catalytic activity is broadly the same than that of surface area and anatase content (Figure 8). It should also be noted that sample TiO2-0M-HT is less active than TiO2-1M-HT or TiO2-12M-HT, in spite of the larger surface area and anatase content of the first one. This result could indicate that the presence of a small content of mixed-phases (i.e., B or B-R) would help to decrease the electron-hole recombination rate, in agreement with previously published results [70,71,72].
One of the main general conclusions that can be extracted is that some parameters, such as surface area and anatase content positively influence the activity, in agreement with the literature [23,24,27]. In contrast, in the conditions studied, differences in the electronic structure of titania seem to play a minor role, also in agreement with previously published results [45,73,74].
Paying more attention to phase composition, the most interesting option seems to be based on predominant anatase-based samples, with low brookite and rutile contents, although it is indeed difficult to get to a conclusion regarding this point due the large number of interconnected parameters influencing the photocatalytic activity.
As mentioned, TiO2-HT photocatalysts lead to higher propene conversion than TiO2-SG ones, which can be justified considering that they have, in general, larger surface areas (100–134 m2/g in HT samples versus 90–120 m2/g in SG ones). The comparison of SG and HT photocatalysts prepared using HCl of the same concentration (i.e., TiO2-0.8 SG and TiO2-0.8 HT) shows that, in general, the higher activity of the TiO2-HT samples correlates well with their larger specific surface area. The pair TiO2-5M SG and TiO2-5M HT constitutes an exception, as the activity of both samples is very similar. Other parameters not analysed in this study, such as surface chemistry, might also play a role.

3.3. Effect of Avoiding Post-Synthesis Heat Treatment

The results from previous sections correspond to samples submitted to a post-synthesis heat treatment at 350 °C, carried out with the purpose of improving the crystallinity of TiO2. However, as hydrothermal synthesis seems to enhance the final crystallinity, it would be interesting to study which are the properties and catalytic behaviour of samples prepared by the SG and HT methods avoiding such heat treatment.
Thus, some additional photocatalysts have been prepared (with and without HCl) avoiding the post synthesis heat treatment (TiO2-0M-SG, TiO2-0M-HT, TiO2-0.8M-HT and TiO2-12M-SG). In addition to the two samples prepared without HCl, TiO2-0.8M-HT has been chosen because it is the most active sample when treated at 350 °C and TiO2-12M-SG was selected because, among the photocatalysts prepared with HCl, it contains the highest amount of anatase from the previous set of samples. The nomenclature of non-treated samples includes WT (“without heat treatment”). Table 3 compiles the properties and propene conversion of TiO2-0M-SG-WT, TiO2-0M-HT-WT, TiO2-0.8M-HT-WT and TiO2-12M-SG-WT and of the analogous samples treated at 350 °C, whose names include for better comparison the temperature of the heat treatment, “350”.
TiO2-0M-SG-WT sample shows a very high surface area (450 m2/g), but it is completely amorphous (XRD spectra is shown in Figure S2, in Supplementary Information), which justifies the low propene conversion obtained (6%). After the heat treatment its crystallinity is developed, but the surface area is strongly reduced and, thus, sample TiO2-0M-SG-350 shows a moderate activity.
Surface area (131 m2/g) and crystallinity (75%) for TiO2-0M-HT-WT sample are high and very similar to that for TiO2-0M-HT-350, meaning, in principle, that the heat treatment in this case would almost have no effect. The similarity between propene conversions for both samples, TiO2-0M-HT-WT and TiO2-0M-HT-350, confirms the relationship between properties and activity.
As previously commented, the SG procedure in absence of HCl does not allow hydrolysis-condensation reactions to take place properly and, thus, the formation of crystalline TiO2 becomes hindered. Hence, in this case, such post-heat treatment is necessary to develop crystallinity in SG sample. In contrast, the heat treatment in HT samples does not improve the high crystallinity attained during the synthesis.
This is also observed in the case of TiO2-0.8M-HT-WT and TiO2-0.8M-HT-350, which have very similar properties and photocatalytic behaviour. Thus, even without heat treatment, the sample prepared with a low HCl concentration presents high crystallinity (70%), containing anatase, brookite and rutile, large surface area (147 m2/g) and low crystal size (Anatase-7 nm).
Finally, the crystallinity of TiO2-12M-SG-WT is 51% (pure anatase), lower than that for sample TiO2-12M-SG-350 (76%), which remarks that by the SG method, even using a high HCl concentration, the development of crystallinity is hindered.
These results indicate that both the heat treatment and the HCl concentration have an important effect on the properties of photocatalysts prepared by the SG synthesis method. Therefore, it can be concluded that adding HCl during the synthesis, both in SG and HT methods, improves the properties and the photocatalytic performance (Figure 7 and Figure 8), although this influence is much more marked for SG materials. Regarding heat treatment, in the SG procedure the post-heat treatment is necessary to develop crystallinity, whereas the heat treatment in HT samples affects only slightly. It must be recalled that higher crystallinity is not always linked to higher propene conversion, since it can be linked to an increase in the mean crystal size and, therefore, to a decrease in the surface area. Anyway, active TiO2 photocatalysts (with higher propene conversion than commercial P25) can be obtained by the HT method, without using acid and without a post-synthesis heat treatment.

4. Conclusions

TiO2 photocatalysts have been prepared by sol-gel (SG) and hydrothermal (HT) methods under mild conditions. The effect of synthesis method, the presence/absence and the concentration of HCl as hydrolysis medium and the post-synthesis heat-treatment on the properties and activity of the photocatalysts have been analysed.
When HCl is used, its concentration influences the development of TO2 crystalline phases, being the effect different in SG and HT methods. The HT method leads, in general, to higher crystallinity and allows to obtain a larger amount of anatase using a low HCl concentration. In fact, TiO2-0M-HT contains the highest amount of anatase. In the SG method the presence of acid is necessary to enhance the crystallization and to obtain samples with acceptable surface area.
Both SG and HT methods are suitable to obtain photocatalysts with large surface area (larger than that of P25titania) and, in general, TiO2-HT samples have larger surface areas and pore volumes than TiO2-SG ones.
In both SG and HT series, the Eg values seem to be determined by the phase composition, in particular by the anatase content, the presence of amorphous TiO2 and the rutile and brookite contents (being the effect of brookite less important than that of rutile). However, the observed differences in the band gap energies do not seem to affect the photocatalytic performance in this application.
In general, TiO2-HT catalysts are more active than TiO2-SG ones and P25 titania for propene photo-oxidation. Surface area and anatase content seem to be the parameters that most significantly influence the photocatalytic activity for the studied application. Samples with a high surface area and a high anatase content, probably with a small percentage of brookite-rutile, seem to be the most interesting photocatalysts. The combination of phases could lead to a decrease in electron-hole recombination rate compared to the case of pure anatase samples.
The post synthesis heat treatment of the SG samples is necessary to develop crystallinity, particularly when no HCl is used in the synthesis, whereas the HT method leads to a high crystallinity even without the use of HCl in the synthesis and without the post synthesis heat treatment.

Supplementary Materials

The following information is available online at https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1944/11/11/2227/s1, Figure S1: Image of the samples TiO2-0M-HT (left) and TiO2-0M-SG (right), both treated at 350 °C, Figure S2: XRD patterns of: (a) TiO2-0M-SG-WT sample and (b) comparison of TiO2-0M-SG-WT with TiO2-0M-SG-350, Table S1: Amount (in wt.%) of the different TiO2 crystalline phases and of amorphous TiO2 and average crystal size for each crystalline phase.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.A.L.-R. and M.C.R.-M.; Methodology, L.C.-C., M.A.L.-R. and M.C.R.-M.; Formal Analysis L.C.-C., M.A.L.-R. and M.C.R.-M.; Investigation, L.C.-C. and A.A.-P.; Writing-Original Draft Preparation, L.C.-C.; Writing-Review & Editing, M.A.L.-R. and M.C.R.-M.; Supervision, M.A.L.-R. and M.C.R.-M.; Project Administration, M.A.L.-R. and M.C.R.-M.

Funding

This research was funded by MINECO and FEDER, project of reference CTQ2015-66080-R, GV/FEDER (PROMETEO/2018/076) and University of Alicante (VIGROB-136).

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness (MINECO) and FEDER, project of reference CTQ2015-66080-R, GV/FEDER (PROMETEO/2018/076) and University of Alicante (VIGROB-136) for financial support.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Goldstein, B.D. Toxic substances in the atmospheric environement. A critical review. J. Air Pollut. Control Assoc. 1983, 33, 454–467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Shah, J.J.; Sing, H.B. Distribution of volatile organic chemicals in outdoor and indoor air. Environ. Sci. Technol. 1988, 22, 1381–1388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Bello, L.; Rosal, R.; Satre, H.; Díez, F.V. Compuestos orgánicos volátiles y el medio ambiente. Ing. Química 1995, 5, 183–187. [Google Scholar]
  4. Blesa, M.A.; Sánchez, B. Eliminación de Contaminantes por Fotocatálisis Heterógenea; CIEMAT: Madrid, Spain, 2004; ISBN 987-43-3809-1. [Google Scholar]
  5. National Research Council. Rethinking the Ozone Problem in Urban and Regional Aire Pollution; National Academy Press: Washington, DC, USA, 1991; ISBN 0-309-56037-3. [Google Scholar]
  6. Bacsik, Z.; McGregor, J.; Mink, J. FTIR analysis of gaseous compounds in the mainstream smoke of regular and light cigarettes. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2007, 45, 266–271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Mühlberger, F.; Streibel, T.; Wieser, J.; Ulrich, A.; Zimmermann, R. Single photon ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry with a pulsed electron beam pumped excimer VUV lamp for on-line gas analysis: Setup and first results on cigarette smoke and human breath. Anal. Chem. 2005, 77, 7408–7414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Ghoshal, A.K.; Manjare, S.D. Selection of appropriate adsorption technique for recovery of VOCs: An analysis. J. Loss Prev. Process Ind. 2002, 15, 413–421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Lillo-Ródenas, M.A.; Bouazza, N.; Berenguer Murcia, A.; Linares Salinas, J.; Soto, P.; Linares Solano, A. Photocatalytic oxidation of propene at low concentration. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2007, 71, 298–309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Bonjour, J.; Clausse, M. Psychrometric-like charts for the energy analysis of VOC recovery processes. Int. J. Therm. Sci. 2006, 45, 520–527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Ozturk, B.; Yilmaz, D. Absorptive Removal of Volatile Organic Compounds from flue gas streams. Process Saf. Environ. Prot. 2006, 84, 391–398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Heymes, F.; Manno-Demoustier, P.; Charbit, F.; Fanlo, J.L.; Moulin, P. A new efficient absorption liquid to treat exhaust air loaded with toluene. Chem. Eng. J. 2006, 115, 225–231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Ruddy, E.N.; Carroll, L.A. Select the Best VOC Control strategy. Chem. Eng. Prog. 1993, 89, 28–35. [Google Scholar]
  14. Moretti, E.C.; Mukhopadhyay, N. VOC Control: Current practices and future trends. Chem. Eng. Prog. 1993, 89, 20–26. [Google Scholar]
  15. Tada, H.; Kiyonaga, T.; Naya, S. Rational design and applications of highly efficient reaction systems photocatalyzed by noble metal nanoparticle-loaded titanium(IV) dioxide. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2009, 38, 1849–1858. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Shayegan, Z.; Lee, C.S.; Haghighat, F. TiO2 photocatalyst for removal of volatile organic compounds in gas phase—A review. Chem. Eng. J. 2018, 334, 2408–2439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Aguirre, M.E.; Zhou, R.; Eugene, A.J.; Guzman, M.I.; Grela, M.A. Cu2O/TiO2 heterostructures for CO2 reduction through a direct Z-scheme: Protecting Cu2O from photocorrosion. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2017, 217, 485–493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Reddy, K.R.; Hassan, M.; Gomes, V.G. Hybrid nanostructures based on titanium dioxide for enhanced photocatalysis. Appl. Catal. A Gen. 2015, 489, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Wang, L.; Cai, Y.; Song, L.; Nie, W.; Zhou, Y.; Chen, P. High efficient photocatalyst of spherical TiO2 particles synthesized by a sol–gel method modified with glycol. Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 2014, 461, 195–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Danish, M.; Ambreen, S.; Chauhan, A.; Pandey, A. Optimization and comparative evaluation of optical and photocatalytic properties of TiO2 thin films prepared via sol-gel method. J. Saudi Chem. Soc. 2015, 557–562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Gupta, S.M.; Tripathi, M. A review of TiO2 nanoparticles. Chin. Sci. Bull. 2011, 56, 1639–1657. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Palmisano, L.; Augugliaro, V.; Bellardita, M.; Di Paola, A.; García López, E.; Loddo, V.; Marcì, G.; Palmisano, G.; Yurdakal, S. Titania photocatalysts for selective oxidations in water. ChemSusChem 2011, 4, 1431–1438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Luttrell, T.; Halpegamage, S.; Tao, J.; Kramer, A.; Sutter, E.; Batzill, M. Why is anatase a better photocatalyst than rutile? Model studies on epitaxial TiO2 films. Sci. Rep. 2015, 4, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Wei, X.; Zhu, G.; Fang, J.; Chen, J. Synthesis, Characterization, and Photocatalysis of Well-Dispersible Phase-Pure Anatase TiO2 Nanoparticles. Int. J. Photoenergy 2013, 2013, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Mutuma, B.K.; Shao, G.N.; Kim, W.D.; Kim, H.T. Sol-gel synthesis of mesoporous anatase-brookite and anatase-brookite-rutile TiO2 nanoparticles and their photocatalytic properties. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2015, 442, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Carneiro, J.T.; Savenije, T.J.; Moulijn, J.A.; Mul, G. How Phase Composition Influences Optoelectronic and Photocatalytic Properties of TiO2. J. Phys. Chem. C 2010, 2211–2217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Sahni, S.; Reddy, S.B.; Murty, B.S. Influence of process parameters on the synthesis of nano-titania by sol–gel route. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 2007, 452–453, 758–762. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Pulido Melián, E.; González Díaz, O.; Doña Rodríguez, J.M.; Colón, G.; Navío, J.A.; Pérez Peña, J. Effect of hydrothermal treatment on structural and photocatalytic properties of TiO2 synthesized by sol–gel method. Appl. Catal. A Gen. 2012, 411–412, 153–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Wen, B.; Liu, C.; Liu, Y. Optimization of the preparation methods. Synthesis of mesostructured TiO2 with high photocatalytic activities. J. Photochem. Photobiol. A Chem. 2005, 173, 7–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Yu, J.C.; Yu, J.; Zhang, L.; Ho, W. Enhancing effects of water content and ultrasonic irradiation on the photocatalytic activity of nano-sized TiO2 powders. J. Photochem. Photobiol. A 2002, 148, 263–271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Colón, G.; Hidalgo, M.C.; Munuera, G.; Ferino, I.; Cutrufello, M.G.; Navío, J.A. Structural and surface approach to the enhanced photocatalytic activity of sulfated TiO2 photocatalyst. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2006, 63, 45–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Liu, H.; Yang, W.; Ma, Y.; Cao, Y.; Yao, J. Promoted phase transition of titania nanoparticles prepared by a photo-assisted sol-gel method. New J. Chem. 2002, 26, 975–977. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Arconada, N.; Castro, Y.; Durán, A. Photocatalytic properties in aqueous solution of porous TiO2-anatase films prepared by sol-gel process. Appl. Catal. A Gen. 2010, 385, 101–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Yu, J.G.; Yu, J.C. Low Temperature Solvent Evaporation-induced Crystallization Synthesis of Nanocrystalline TiO2 Photocatalyst. Chin. J. Chem. 2003, 21, 994–997. [Google Scholar]
  35. Yu, J.G.; Yu, J.C.; Ho, W.K.; Jiang, Z.T. Effects of calcination temperature on the photocatalytic activity and photo-induced super-hydrophilicity of mesoporous TiO2 thin films. New J. Chem. 2002, 26, 607–613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Li, S.; Ye, G.; Chen, G. Low-Temperature Preparation and Characterization of Nanocrystalline Anatase TiO2. J. Phys. Chem. C 2009, 113, 4031–4037. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Liu, A.R.; Wang, S.M.; Zhao, Y.R.; Zheng, Z. Low-temperature preparation of nanocrystalline TiO2 photocatalyst with a very large specific surface area. Mater. Chem. Phys. 2006, 99, 131–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Chuan, X. Preparation and photocatalytic performance of anatase-mounted natural porous silica, pumice, by hydrolysis under hydrothermal conditions. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2004, 51, 255–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Kolenko, Y.V.; Maximov, V.D.; Burukhin, A.A.; Muhanov, V.A.; Churagulov, B.R. Synthesis of ZrO2 and TiO2 nanocrystalline powders by hydrothermal process. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 2003, 23, 1033–1038. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Dai, S.; Wu, Y.; Sakai, T.; Du, Z.; Sakai, H.; Abe, M. Preparation of highly crystalline TiO2 nanostructures by acid-assisted hydrothermal treatment of hexagonal-structured nanocrystalline titania/cetyltrimethyammonium bromide nanoskeleton. Nanoscale Res. Lett. 2010, 5, 1829–1835. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Andersson, M.; Osterlund, L.; Ljungstrom, S.; Palmqvist, A. Preparation of Nanosize Anatase and Rutile TiO2 by Hydrothermal Treatment of Microemulsions and Their Activity for Photocatalytic Wet Oxidation of Phenol. J. Phys. Chem. B 2002, 106, 10674–10679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Zhou, J.; Song, B.; Zhao, G.; Han, G. Effects of acid on the microstructures and properties of three-dimensional TiO2 hierarchical structures by solvothermal method. Nanoscale Res. Lett. 2012, 7, 217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Ao, Y.; Xu, J.; Fu, D. Study on the effect of different acids on the structure and photocatalytic activity of mesoporous titania. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2009, 256, 239–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Serrano, D.P.; Calleja, G.; Sanz, R.; Pizarro, P. Preparation of bimodal micro-mesoporous TiO2 with tailored crystalline properties. Chem. Commun. 2004, 10, 1000–1001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Cano-Casanova, L.; Amorós-Pérez, A.; Ouzzine, M.; Lillo-Ródenas, M.A.; Román-Martínez, M.C. One step hydrothermal synthesis of TiO2 with variable HCl concentration: Detailed characterization and photocatalytic activity in propene oxidation. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2018, 220, 645–653. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Wu, M.; Long, J.; Huang, A.; Luo, Y.; Feng, S.; Xu, R. Microemulsion-mediated hydrothermal synthesis and characterization of nanosize rutile and anatase particles. Langmuir 1999, 15, 8822–8825. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Hoque, M.; Guzman, M.; Hoque, M.A.; Guzman, M.I. Photocatalytic Activity: Experimental Features to Report in Heterogeneous Photocatalysis. Materials 2018, 11, 1990. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Wang, S.; Ji, L.; Wu, B.; Gong, Q.; Zhu, Y.; Liang, J. Influence of surface treatment on preparing nanosized TiO2 supported on carbon nanotubes. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2008, 255, 3263–3266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Rodriguez-Reinoso, F.; Linares-Solano, A. Microporous Structure of Activated Carbons as Revealed by Adsorption Methods; Thrower, P.A., Ed.; Marcel Dekker Inc.: New York, NY, USA, 1989. [Google Scholar]
  50. Gandhe, A.R.; Fernandes, J.B. A simple method to synthesize N-doped rutile titania with enhanced photocatalytic activity in sunlight. J. Solid State Chem. 2005, 178, 2953–2957. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Aguilar, T.; Navas, J.; Alcántara, R.; Fernández-Lorenzo, C.; Gallardo, J.J.; Blanco, G.; Martín-Calleja, J. A route for the synthesis of Cu-doped TiO2 nanoparticles with a very low band gap. Chem. Phys. Lett. 2013, 571, 49–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. ICDD: The International Centre for Diffraction Data. Available online: http://www.icdd.com/ (accessed on 10 October 2018).
  53. Zhang, H.; Banfield, J.F. Understanding Polymorphic Phase Transformation Behavior during Growth of Nanocrystalline Aggregates: Insights from TiO2. J. Phys. Chem. B 2000, 104, 3481–3487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Jensen, H.; Joensen, K.D.; Jørgensen, J.E.; Pedersen, J.S.; Søgaard, E.G. Characterization of nanosized partly crystalline photocatalysts. J. Nanopart. Res. 2004, 6, 519–526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Bellardita, M.; Di Paola, A.; Megna, B.; Palmisano, L. Absolute crystallinity and photocatalytic activity of brookite TiO2 samples. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2017, 201, 150–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Ohtani, B.; Prieto-Mahaney, O.O.; Li, D.; Abe, R. What is Degussa (Evonik) P25? Crystalline composition analysis, reconstruction from isolated pure particles and photocatalytic activity test. J. Photochem. Photobiol. A Chem. 2010, 216, 179–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  57. Bellardita, M.; Di Paola, A.; Megna, B.; Palmisano, L. Determination of the crystallinity of TiO2 photocatalysts. J. Photochem. Photobiol. A Chem. 2018, 367, 312–320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Wang, X.; Sø, L.; Su, R.; Wendt, S.; Hald, P.; Mamakhel, A.; Yang, C.; Huang, Y.; Iversen, B.B.; Besenbacher, F. The influence of crystallite size and crystallinity of anatase nanoparticles on the photo-degradation of phenol. J. Catal. 2014, 310, 100–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Jensen, H.; Soloviev, A.; Li, Z.; Søgaard, E.G. XPS and FTIR investigation of the surface properties of different prepared titania nano-powders. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2005, 246, 239–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Di Paola, A.; Bellardita, M.; Palmisano, L.; Barbieriková, Z.; Brezová, V. Influence of crystallinity and OH surface density on the photocatalytic activity of TiO2 powders. J. Photochem. Photobiol. A Chem. 2014, 273, 59–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Marcì, G.; García-López, E.; Bellardita, M.; Parisi, F.; Colbeau-Justin, C.; Sorgues, S.; Liotta, L.F.; Palmisano, L. Keggin heteropolyacid H3PW12O40 supported on different oxides for catalytic and catalytic photo-assisted propene hydration. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2013, 15, 13329–13342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  62. Sing, K.S.W.; Everett, D.H.; Haul, R.A.W.; Moscou, L.; Pierotti, R.A.; Rouquerol, J.; Siemieniewska, T. Reporting Phisisorption data for Gas/Solid systems with Special Reference to the Determination of Surface Area and Porosity. Pure Appl. Chem. 1982, 54, 2201–2218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Sayilkan, F.; Asilturk, M. Characterization of TiO2 Synthesized in Alcohol by a Sol-Gel Process: The Effects of Annealing Temperature and Acid Catalyst. Turkish J. Chem 2005, 29, 697–706. [Google Scholar]
  64. Coronado, J.; Portela, R.; Fresno, F.; Hernández-Alonso, M.D. Design of Advanced Photocatalytic Materials for Energy and Environmental; Springer: London, UK, 2013; pp. 85–102. ISBN 978-1-4471-5061-9. [Google Scholar]
  65. Di Paola, A.; Bellardita, M.; Palmisano, L. Brookite, the Least Known TiO2 Photocatalyst. Catalysts 2013, 3, 36–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Zhang, Z.; Wang, C.-C.; Zakaria, R.; Ying, J.Y. Role of Particle Size in Nanocrystalline TiO2-Based Photocatalysts. J. Phys. Chem. B 1998, 102, 10871–10878. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Naik, V.M.; Haddad, D.; Naik, R.; Benci, J.; Auner, G.W. Optical Properties of Anatase, Rutile and Amorphous Phases of TiO2 Thin Films Grown at Room Temperature by RF Magnetron Sputtering. Mater. Res. 2003, 775, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Valencia, S.; Marín, J.M.; Restrepo, G. Study of the Bandgap of Synthesized Titanium Dioxide Nanoparticules Using the Sol-Gel Method and a Hydrothermal Treatment. Open Mater. Sci. J. 2010, 4, 9–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Ouzzine, M.; Lillo-Ródenas, M.A.; Linares-Solano, A. Photocatalytic oxidation of propene in gas phase at low concentration by optimized TiO2 nanoparticles. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2013, 134–135, 333–343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Bacsa, R.R.; Kiwi, J. Effect of rutile phase on the photocatalytic properties of nanocrystalline titania during the degradation of p-coumaric acid. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 1998, 16, 19–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Warson, J.M.; Cooper, A.T.; Flora, J.R.V. Nanoglued Titanium Dioxide Aerogels for Photocatalysis. Environ. Eng. Sci. 2005, 22, 666–675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Hurum, D.C.; Agrios, A.G.; Crist, S.E.; Gray, K.A.; Rajh, T.; Thurnauer, M.C. Probing reaction mechanisms in mixed phase TiO2 by EPR. J. Electron Spectros. Relat. Phenomena 2006, 150, 155–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Jaramillo-Páez, C.; Navío, J.A.; Hidalgo, M.C. Silver-modified ZnO highly UV-photoactive. J. Photochem. Photobiol. A Chem. 2018, 356, 112–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Fernández-Catalá, J.; Cano-Casanova, L.; Lillo-Ródenas, M.Á.; Berenguer-Murcia, Á.; Cazorla-Amorós, D. Synthesis of TiO2 with hierarchical porosity for the photooxidation of propene. Molecules 2017, 22, 2243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Materials 11 02227 g001 550
Figure 1. XRD patterns of: (a) SG samples ((a) TiO2-0M-SG, (b) TiO2-0.8M-SG, (c) TiO2-1M-SG, (d) TiO2-5M- SG and (e) TiO2-12M- SG) and (b) HT samples ((f) TiO2-0M-HT, (g) TiO2-0.8M-HT, (h) TiO2-1M-HT, (i) TiO2-5M-HT and (j) TiO2-12M-HT).
Figure 1. XRD patterns of: (a) SG samples ((a) TiO2-0M-SG, (b) TiO2-0.8M-SG, (c) TiO2-1M-SG, (d) TiO2-5M- SG and (e) TiO2-12M- SG) and (b) HT samples ((f) TiO2-0M-HT, (g) TiO2-0.8M-HT, (h) TiO2-1M-HT, (i) TiO2-5M-HT and (j) TiO2-12M-HT).
Materials 11 02227 g001
Materials 11 02227 g002 550
Figure 2. Distribution of crystalline and amorphous phases in TiO2-SG and TiO2-HT samples. Numbers in the figure refer to the mean crystal size (nm) of each TiO2 crystalline phase.
Figure 2. Distribution of crystalline and amorphous phases in TiO2-SG and TiO2-HT samples. Numbers in the figure refer to the mean crystal size (nm) of each TiO2 crystalline phase.
Materials 11 02227 g002
Materials 11 02227 g003 550
Figure 3. N2 adsorption-desorption isotherms at −196 °C of samples: (a) TiO2-XM-SG and (b) TiO2-XM-HT.
Figure 3. N2 adsorption-desorption isotherms at −196 °C of samples: (a) TiO2-XM-SG and (b) TiO2-XM-HT.
Materials 11 02227 g003
Materials 11 02227 g004 550
Figure 4. BET surface area vs amorphous percentage for the SG and HT photocatalysts and P25 titania.
Figure 4. BET surface area vs amorphous percentage for the SG and HT photocatalysts and P25 titania.
Materials 11 02227 g004
Materials 11 02227 g005 550
Figure 5. Band gap energy values for SG and HT photocatalysts: (a) versus anatase content and (b) versus the content of rutile (filled symbols) or brookite (empty symbols).
Figure 5. Band gap energy values for SG and HT photocatalysts: (a) versus anatase content and (b) versus the content of rutile (filled symbols) or brookite (empty symbols).
Materials 11 02227 g005
Materials 11 02227 g006 550
Figure 6. Propene conversion (%) at 30 and 60 mL/min for the SG and HT photocatalysts and for P25.
Figure 6. Propene conversion (%) at 30 and 60 mL/min for the SG and HT photocatalysts and for P25.
Materials 11 02227 g006
Materials 11 02227 g007 550
Figure 7. Propene conversion (using 30 mL/min gas flow), surface area and weight percentage of each crystalline phase in the SG photocatalysts.
Figure 7. Propene conversion (using 30 mL/min gas flow), surface area and weight percentage of each crystalline phase in the SG photocatalysts.
Materials 11 02227 g007
Materials 11 02227 g008 550
Figure 8. Propene conversions (30 mL/min), surface areas and weight compositions of crystalline phases for the HT-materials.
Figure 8. Propene conversions (30 mL/min), surface areas and weight compositions of crystalline phases for the HT-materials.
Materials 11 02227 g008
Table
Table 1. Textural properties of the SG and HT series of samples.
Table 1. Textural properties of the SG and HT series of samples.
SampleSBET (m2/g)VDR N2 (cm3/g)Vmeso (cm3/g)VT (cm3/g)
TiO2-0M-SG340.010.040.06
TiO2-0.8M-SG1080.040.070.12
TiO2-1M-SG890.030.080.11
TiO2-5M-SG1180.040.100.16
TiO2-12M-SG980.040.100.17
TiO2-0M-HT1270.050.380.45
TiO2-0.8M-HT1340.050.290.36
TiO2-1M-HT1160.040.250.33
TiO2-5M-HT1000.040.200.26
TiO2-12M-HT1100.040.260.32
P25550.020.070.18
Table
Table 2. Energy band gap for SG and HT photocatalysts and for P25 titania.
Table 2. Energy band gap for SG and HT photocatalysts and for P25 titania.
SampleEg (eV)
TiO2-0M-SG3.03
TiO2-0.8M SG2.92
TiO2-1M SG2.80
TiO2-5M SG2.95
TiO2-12M SG3.13
TiO2-0M-HT3.14
TiO2-0.8M HT2.95
TiO2-1M HT2.95
TiO2-5M HT2.85
TiO2-12M HT3.15
P252.95
Table
Table 3. Physico-chemical properties and propene conversions for TiO2-0M-SG, TiO2-0M-HT, TiO2-0.8M-HT and TiO2-12M-SG (with and without heat treatment) and for P25.
Table 3. Physico-chemical properties and propene conversions for TiO2-0M-SG, TiO2-0M-HT, TiO2-0.8M-HT and TiO2-12M-SG (with and without heat treatment) and for P25.
SampleSBET (m2/g)Crystalline TiO2 (wt.%)Average Anatase Crystallite Size (nm)Propene Conversion (%)
TiO2-0M-SG-WT450--6.0
TiO2-0M-SG-35034A (67)9.024.0
TiO2-0M-HT-WT131A (75)9.070.0
TiO2-0M-HT-350127A (78)1060.0
TiO2-0.8M-HT-WT147A (53)-B (16)-R (1)7.078.0
TiO2-0.8M-HT-350134A (60)-B (16)-R (1)8.076.0
TiO2-12M-SG-WT160A (51)5.068.0
TiO2-12M-SG-35098A (76)10.044.0
P2555A (73)2261.5

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Cano-Casanova, L.; Amorós-Pérez, A.; Lillo-Ródenas, M.Á.; Román-Martínez, M.d.C. Effect of the Preparation Method (Sol-Gel or Hydrothermal) and Conditions on the TiO2 Properties and Activity for Propene Oxidation. Materials 2018, 11, 2227. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma11112227

AMA Style

Cano-Casanova L, Amorós-Pérez A, Lillo-Ródenas MÁ, Román-Martínez MdC. Effect of the Preparation Method (Sol-Gel or Hydrothermal) and Conditions on the TiO2 Properties and Activity for Propene Oxidation. Materials. 2018; 11(11):2227. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma11112227

Chicago/Turabian Style

Cano-Casanova, Laura, Ana Amorós-Pérez, María Ángeles Lillo-Ródenas, and María del Carmen Román-Martínez. 2018. "Effect of the Preparation Method (Sol-Gel or Hydrothermal) and Conditions on the TiO2 Properties and Activity for Propene Oxidation" Materials 11, no. 11: 2227. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma11112227

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop