Next Article in Journal
Ship Electric Propulsion Based on Hydrogen Fuel Cell, Batteries, PVs and WASP: Energy Management, Dynamics and Converter-Driven Stability
Previous Article in Journal
Nexus Between Renewable, Non-Renewable, Nuclear Energy Consumption and Economic Growth in Five Developing and Developed Countries: A Cobb–Douglas Production Function Analysis
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Hierarchical Porous Polyimide Separator Prepared by Sodium Chloride Salt for High-Performance Lithium Ion Batteries

1
Key Laboratory of Electrochemical Energy Safety, Ministry of Emergency Management, Beijing 102402, China
2
XYZ Storage Technology Corp., Ltd., Beijing 102402, China
3
China Power International Development Limited, Beijing 100080, China
4
Research Center of Grid Energy Storage and Battery Application, School of Electrical and Information Engineering, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450001, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Energies 2026, 19(11), 2635; https://doi.org/10.3390/en19112635
Submission received: 30 April 2026 / Revised: 22 May 2026 / Accepted: 25 May 2026 / Published: 29 May 2026
(This article belongs to the Section D1: Advanced Energy Materials)

Abstract

Lithium-ion batteries have been widely used as energy storage and power batteries due to their unique advantages. However, with increasing demands for battery performance and application scenarios, battery safety has become a significant obstacle to their application. To address this issue, this paper proposes and fabricates an advanced polyimide (PI) separator material with high porosity and excellent thermal stability. By introducing sodium chloride (NaCl) as a pore-forming template into a polyamic acid (PAA) precursor, a PI-based separator with a uniformly interpenetrating sponge-like pore structure was successfully constructed. The obtained PI-NaCl separator exhibits outstanding thermal structural stability, maintaining dimensional integrity without significant thermal shrinkage even when tested at temperatures as high as 250 °C. Furthermore, the porous structure of the PI-NaCl separator demonstrates excellent electrolyte wettability, as the electrolyte rapidly spreads upon contact (contact angle approaching 0°), which is significantly superior to commercial separators. In lithium symmetric cell tests, this separator achieves long-term stable stripping/plating cycling by virtue of its outstanding ionic conductivity, effectively mitigating interfacial side reactions with lithium metal. In LiFePO4||C full-cell applications, the PI-NaCl-based battery exhibits good rate capability and cycling stability. Additionally, in an open-circuit voltage (OCV) monitoring experiment at a high temperature of 80 °C, the voltage of the PI-NaCl-based battery remained stable continuously for 8 h in comparison to that of the commercial separator-based battery.

1. Introduction

Against the backdrop of the continuous deepening of global energy transformation, lithium-ion batteries, leveraging their core advantages such as outstanding energy density, excellent cycling performance, low self-discharge rate, and environmental friendliness, have fundamentally reshaped the application landscape of traditional energy storage devices [1,2,3,4,5]. They have not only become the core power source for consumer electronics, new energy vehicles, rail transit, and other fields but have also demonstrated irreplaceable application value in emerging areas such as large-scale energy storage power stations, smart grids, and aerospace, thereby laying a solid energy storage foundation for the realization of global carbon neutrality and carbon peak strategic goals [6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14]. With the rapid development of the new energy industry, the performance requirements for lithium-ion batteries continue to escalate, making high energy density, high safety and stability, long cycle life, and excellent rate capability the core research and development directions for next-generation lithium-ion batteries [15,16,17]. As an indispensable key component within lithium-ion batteries, the separator undertakes the dual functions of isolating the positive and negative active materials, blocking electron conduction, and providing channels for lithium-ion migration. Its microstructure, physicochemical properties, and interfacial characteristics directly affect critical indicators such as ion transport efficiency, charge/discharge rate, cycling stability, and thermal safety performance of lithium-ion batteries [18,19,20,21]. Acting as the core bridge connecting the positive and negative electrodes and the electrolyte system, the performance of the separator is highly correlated with the overall quality, service life, and safety reliability of lithium-ion batteries [22,23].
For the current commercial separator, polyolefin separators have consistently held a dominant position due to their mature technology and well-established manufacturing processes [24,25,26]. Among these, monolayer polypropylene (PP) separators, polyethylene (PE) separators, and PP/PE/PP multilayer composite separators are the most widely commercialized categories [24]. Leveraging their structural characteristics and cost advantages, such polyolefin separators have met the basic application requirements of traditional lithium-ion batteries and have driven the large-scale development of the lithium-ion battery industry over the past several decades [25,26]. However, as lithium-ion batteries undergo iterative upgrades toward higher energy density and power density, the inherent material limitations of conventional polyolefin separators have become increasingly prominent, posing a critical bottleneck restricting the development of high-performance, high-safety lithium-ion batteries [24,25,26]. Actually, polyolefin materials are thermoplastic polymers with relatively low melting points (PE melts at approximately 135 °C, and PP at approximately 165 °C) [27]. Under extreme conditions such as high-temperature abuse, overcharging, and short circuits, polyolefin separators are highly prone to thermal shrinkage and melt collapse, directly causing contact between the positive and negative electrodes and triggering internal short circuits [27,28,29]. This can further induce thermal runaway, leading to serious safety accidents including fire and explosion, thus failing to meet the application requirements of high-safety power and energy storage batteries [28,29,30,31]. And polyolefin molecular chains are non-polar with very low surface energy, resulting in poor affinity with polar carbonate-based electrolytes. The inadequate electrolyte wettability and liquid retention capacity significantly increase the transport resistance of lithium ions within the separator pores [32,33]. This not only limits the improvement of battery rate capability but also leads to a sharp decline in charge/discharge efficiency and a significant increase in interfacial impedance under low-temperature operating conditions [32,33,34]. Furthermore, the microporous structure of conventional polyolefin separators is typically produced by physical stretching, resulting in uneven pore size distribution, high pore tortuosity, and susceptibility to pore closure, deformation, and collapse during long-term charge/discharge cycling. These issues further exacerbate the hindrance of lithium-ion transport, causing rapid capacity degradation and a substantial reduction in cycle life [35,36,37,38].
To compensate for the performance shortcomings of polyolefin separators, surface modification approaches are commonly employed in the industry for optimization [39]. Common methods include inorganic ceramic particle coating, organic polymer coating modification, and composite multilayer structural design. Although such modification methods have improved the thermal stability, electrolyte wettability, and mechanical strength of the separators to a certain extent, they have not fundamentally altered the material properties of the polyolefin matrix [40]. Consequently, they cannot completely resolve the core issues of poor thermal stability and weak interfacial affinity, making it difficult to meet the development demands of next-generation high-energy-density, high-safety lithium-ion batteries. Therefore, the development of novel high-performance matrix materials, combined with efficient and feasible preparation processes, to create new separators that possess excellent thermal stability, good electrolyte wettability, and a controllable microporous structure has become indispensable and a key breakthrough direction for next-generation high-performance lithium-ion batteries.
Polyimide (PI), as a high-performance aromatic heterocyclic polymer material, exhibits exceptional thermal stability, mechanical strength, chemical inertness, and aging resistance due to the stable imide ring structure in its molecular chains. Its glass transition temperature can exceed 300 °C, allowing it to maintain good structural integrity and mechanical properties even under high-temperature environments. This fundamentally addresses the thermal shrinkage defect of polyolefin separators, making PI an ideal material for preparing high-performance lithium battery separators. Professor Miao prepared PI nanofiber nonwoven membranes using electrospinning to improve thermal stability and electrolyte wettability [41]. Lin and coworkers introduced carboxyl groups into the PI molecular structure to enhance electrolyte wettability and Li+ transport capability [42]. Likewise, Zhang group fabricated PI membranes by combining a soluble precursor with a non-solvent induced phase separation process [43]. However, pure polyimide separators suffer from issues such as poor film formability, difficulty in precisely controlling porosity, insufficient surface lyophilicity, and the need for improved ion transport efficiency. Direct application of pure PI separators in the field of lithium battery separators makes it difficult to achieve the desired electrochemical performance. To address this challenge, this study proposes the preparation of a PI-NaCl composite lithium battery separator using a coating process. Abandoning complex preparation methods such as electrospinning, this approach adopts the coating technique as the core, which features a simple process and scalability for mass production. NaCl is introduced as a pore-forming agent into the polyimide slurry system, and an integrated process of coating film formation, thermal imidization, and water washing for salt removal is employed to fabricate a PI-NaCl composite separator with controllable structure and excellent performance. During this preparation process, NaCl particles serve as a green and efficient pore-forming template, which can be completely removed during the water washing step. This constructs a uniformly connected three-dimensional pore network within the polyimide coating, enabling precise regulation of the separator’s porosity and pore size distribution, and significantly enhancing the electrolyte permeability and retention capacity. Meanwhile, the polar sites remaining from the NaCl pore-forming process effectively improve the surface polarity of the polyimide coating, enhance its interfacial compatibility with polar electrolytes, reduce lithium ion transport impedance, and optimize the electrochemical kinetic processes of the battery.
Therefore, in this work, the microstructure, physical properties, and electrochemical performance of the PI-NaCl separator were systematically investigated, and its high safety, electrochemical performance, and potential for large-scale application as a novel lithium battery separator were verified. The thermal stability of the commercial separator and the PI-NaCl separator was systematically compared at 150 °C and 180 °C. It was found that the commercial separator underwent severe melting and shrinkage, while the PI-NaCl separator exhibited almost no structural change. In terms of interfacial performance, the synergistic effect of the porous structure and polar surface significantly enhanced electrolyte wettability and liquid retention capacity, reduced interfacial impedance, and ensured fast and stable lithium-ion transport. Based on the excellent thermal stability of the full cell using the PI-NaCl separator, the open-circuit voltage remained at 3.2 V at 150 °C, demonstrating outstanding high-temperature resistance, effectively suppressing thermal shrinkage of the separator and reducing the risk of short circuits. The PI-based lithium battery separator prepared using the template agent provides new technical support and research ideas for the technological upgrading and industrial application of high-performance lithium-ion batteries.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Preparation of Porous PI Film

An appropriate amount of 4,4′-Oxydianiline (ODA) was dissolved in DMAc(N,N-Dimethylacetamide, analytic reagent) solvent under constant stirring at 25 °C to make a transparent solution. Then, 4,4′-oxydiphthalic anhydride (ODPA) was slowly added dropwise with continuous stirring to obtain a polyamic acid (PAA) casting solution where ODA and ODPA have the same amount of substance. The PAA casting solution was uniformly coated onto a clean glass plate using a precision scraper (gap: 100 μm) to produce a PAA wet film with a scale of 7 cm*14 cm. About 15 g NaCl powder with a wide range of micron and nanometer scales was spread onto the surface of the wet film and gently pressed to partially embed the NaCl into the film, forming a PAA-NaCl composite wet film. The composite wet film was placed in a forced-air drying oven and dried until completely solidified, then peeled off from the glass plate. The dried composite film was placed into a muffle furnace and heated according to a programmed temperature ramp (from 25 °C to 150 °C for 1 h; from 150 °C to 250 °C for 1 h; from 250 °C to 350 °C for 2 h and heating rate of 5 °C/min) to convert the PAA into polyimide (PI) while maintaining the original morphology of NaCl. (The chemical structure of PI synthesis is shown in Figure S1). The PI-NaCl composite film was immersed in excess deionized water and magnetically stirred at 150 r/min for 12 h, during which the water was changed three times, to completely dissolve and remove the NaCl. The resulting porous PI film was taken out, the surface moisture was absorbed with filter paper, and it was dried in a forced-air drying oven at 60 °C for 1 h. After cutting, the PI-NaCl porous separator with three-dimensionally interconnected pores was obtained.

2.2. Characterization

Field emission scanning electron microscopy (Zeiss-Sigma, Japan) was used to observe the surface and cross-sectional microstructures of the separators. Prior to testing, the sample surfaces were sputter-coated with gold under vacuum to enhance conductivity, thereby obtaining high-resolution images of the pore structure and verifying the porous morphology after NaCl template removal. The molecular chemical structure and crystalline characteristics of the samples were characterized using Raman spectroscopy (XploraPLUS, HORIBA, Shanghai, China) and X-ray diffraction (MiniFlex, Rigaku, Beijing, China), respectively. The chemical composition and phase information of the samples were analyzed through full-spectrum scanning. A universal testing machine (CMT2000, MTS-SANS, Shenzhen, China) was used to evaluate the mechanical strength of the separators. The separator samples were cut into standard rectangular strips (25 mm × 50 mm) and subjected to tensile testing at a constant stretching speed of 5 mm/min under room temperature conditions. The thermal degradation behavior of the separators was evaluated using a METTLER TOLEDO, Mettler-Toledo, Shanghai, China thermogravimetric analyzer. The samples were continuously heated from 30 °C to 800 °C at a heating rate of 10 °C/min, and the mass change with increasing temperature was recorded. The separators were cut into discs of 16 mm diameter and placed in a muffle furnace for heat treatment at 150 °C, 200 °C, and 250 °C for 1 h each. By comparing the macroscopic dimensional changes and morphological evolution of the separators before and after heat treatment, their dimensional stability and heat resistance under high temperatures were evaluated. To comprehensively assess the wettability of the separators toward the electrolyte, a contact angle measuring instrument (model: LAUDA-LSA100, Shanghai, China) was used to measure the dynamic contact angle between a droplet and the separator surface. A 16 mm diameter separator disc was fixed on the test stage, and 2 μL of commercial electrolyte (1 M LiPF6 in EC/DMC/DEC) was dropped onto it. The contact angle of the droplet on the separator surface was recorded using a high-speed camera system. In the electrolyte spreading experiment on the separator, 20 μL of electrolyte was dropped once at the center of a 16 mm diameter separator disc, and the wetting and spreading process of the electrolyte on the membrane surface was recorded by video.

2.3. Electrochemical Performance Test

To comprehensively evaluate the electrochemical performance of the PI-NaCl composite separator and its application potential in practical battery systems, all assembly operations of electrochemical coin cells (CR2032 type) were strictly conducted in a high-purity argon-filled glovebox, where both moisture and oxygen levels were controlled below 0.1 ppm. The separator samples used in the tests were uniformly cut into discs of 18 mm diameter and fully wetted with liquid electrolyte prior to assembly. The standard liquid electrolyte system employed in this experiment was 1.0 mol/L lithium bis(trifluoromethanesulfonyl)imide (LiTFSI) in a mixed solvent of ethylene carbonate (EC)/dimethyl carbonate (DMC)/diethyl carbonate (DEC) with a volume ratio of 1:1:1. The commercial separators used in this work were purchased from Celgard (Shanghai, China). The thickness of the PP monolayer separator was 30 μm, while that of the PP/PE/PP trilayer separator was 40 μm. For ionic conductivity characterization, stainless steel symmetric cells were assembled using the PI-NaCl separator. Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) measurements were performed on the assembled symmetric cells using an electrochemical workstation. The test parameters were set as follows: AC voltage perturbation amplitude of 5 mV, and frequency range from 1 Hz to 105 Hz. The ionic conductivity (σ) of the separator was calculated using the formula σ = d/(R·S), where d is the thickness of the wetted separator, R is the bulk resistance obtained from the intercept of the impedance spectrum with the real axis in the high-frequency region, and S is the effective contact area between the stainless steel electrode and the separator. For lithium-ion transference number measurements, lithium symmetric cells were allowed to stand at room temperature until the open-circuit voltage stabilized. Prior to polarization, AC impedance spectroscopy (EIS) tests were performed with a frequency range of 105 Hz to 0.1 Hz and an AC perturbation voltage of 5 mV, and the impedances before and after polarization were recorded. In the chemical stability experiments of the separator, linear sweep voltammetry (CHI660E, Shanghai, China) was performed on lithium-stainless steel half-cells. The scanning potential range was set from 2.0 V to 6.0 V, and the scan rate was controlled at 5 mV/s to accurately determine the onset potential of oxidative decomposition of the electrolyte at the separator interface. The coin cells were of type CR2032. For lithium symmetric cells, long-term cycling tests were conducted based on different separators. For full cells, graphite was used as the anode and lithium iron phosphate (LiFePO4) as the cathode, with the same electrolyte as above. The charge/discharge voltage range was 2.8 V to 3.65 V, and a LAND battery testing system was used.

3. Results and Discussion

Figure 1 schematically illustrates the preparation process of the functional separator. Polyamic acid was first prepared by polyreaction. Then, NaCl particles with different sizes were dispersed on the polyamic acid matrix. Subsequently, after imidization, polyamic acid was converted into polyimide, and the color changed from light to pale yellow. Leveraging the high solubility of sodium chloride in water and the water insolubility of polyimide, the NaCl template was removed readily, thereby obtaining a porous polyimide membrane.
The microstructure of the PI-NaCl separator was characterized in detail by scanning electron microscopy (SEM). As shown in Figure 2a, the PI-NaCl separator exhibits an extremely rich and interconnected three-dimensional porous network structure. At higher magnification (Figure 2c), the pores are clearly observed to be irregular and open, with distinct and densely distributed pore walls. This sponge-like macro/mesoporous structure greatly increases the specific surface area of the separator, facilitating efficient wetting by the liquid electrolyte and providing excellent liquid retention capacity. From the cross-sectional morphology (Figure 2b), it can be seen that the interior presents a typical hierarchical porous architecture, with pores penetrating the entire thickness direction. This interconnected three-dimensional pore network not only provides ample space for electrolyte accommodation but also offers continuous, low-impedance transport channels for rapid lithium ion (Li+) shuttling between the positive and negative electrodes, thereby laying a structural foundation for enhancing the ionic conductivity of the battery. Raman spectroscopy and X-ray diffraction (XRD) were employed to characterize the surface chemical structure and molecular crystalline phase of the separator. Figure 2d shows a comparison of the Raman spectra of the PI-NaCl separator and the pure PI separator. Both curves exhibit characteristic peaks of the polyimide chain at approximately 1380 cm−1, 1600 cm−1, and 1780 cm−1, corresponding to imide ring deformation, aromatic ring skeleton vibration, and carbonyl (C=O) symmetric stretching, respectively. The peak positions are completely consistent between the two, and no new impurity peaks appear, indicating that the introduction of NaCl and the pore-forming process did not disrupt the main chemical chain of the PI molecules or form new chemical bonds. However, the peak intensity of PI-NaCl is significantly weaker than that of pure PI, which is generally attributed to enhanced surface light scattering and reduced local density due to its abundant porous structure. The XRD patterns in Figure 2e further confirm the phase characteristics of the separators. Both PI-NaCl and pure PI exhibit broad diffuse scattering peaks, which are typical characteristics of an amorphous (non-crystalline) polymer structure. No sharp crystalline peaks of NaCl are detected in the patterns, indicating that the pore-forming agent was completely removed during the preparation process. Furthermore, the highly amorphous polymer backbone facilitates local segmental motion of polymer chains within the amorphous regions, promoting electrolyte permeation and ionic conduction. Figure 2f compares the room-temperature tensile stress–strain curves of the PI-NaCl separator with those of a commercial polypropylene (PP) monolayer separator and a commercial PP/PE/PP trilayer composite separator. The test results show that the commercial PP and PP/PE/PP separators exhibit good flexibility (elongation at break of approximately 31% and 26%, respectively), but their tensile strengths are relatively low (peak stress below 100 MPa). In contrast, the PI-NaCl separator exhibits excellent rigidity and tensile strength. The initial slope of its stress–strain curve is much higher than that of the commercial polyolefin separators, and the maximum tensile strength exceeds 108 MPa. The Young’s modulus of PI-NaCl was calculated to be 1.8 GPa, while that of PP/PE/PP is approximately 0.7 GPa and pure PP is about 0.5 GPa. Although its elongation at break is reduced, this ultra-high mechanical strength endows the separator with outstanding physical rigidity. In actual battery cycling, this high-strength polyimide backbone can effectively resist the stress caused by electrode volume expansion and form a robust physical barrier, fundamentally inhibiting the physical penetration of sharp lithium dendrites through the separator, thereby significantly improving the safety of lithium batteries.
By capturing the dynamic contact angle changes in electrolyte droplets on the separator surface, the wetting kinetics of the material can be accurately reflected. As shown in Figure 3a, conventional commercial polyolefin separators exhibit an extremely sluggish wetting process. After the droplet contacts the separator surface, its contact angle only slowly decreases from its initial state to 43.2° (PP) and 40.0° (PP/PE/PP) over a period of up to 60 s, with the droplet never fully penetrating into the separator interior. This is mainly attributed to the inherently non-polar nature of polyolefin materials, which have low surface energy and lack molecular affinity with polar carbonate-based electrolytes (such as those containing EC/DMC/DEC). In stark contrast, the PI-NaCl separator demonstrates exceptionally superior ultrafast lyophilicity. Its measurement time scale spans from the “second (s)” level to the “millisecond (ms)” level. The droplet undergoes dramatic spreading immediately upon contacting the PI-NaCl surface. At 30 ms, the contact angle has already sharply decreased to 23.6°, and within just 200 ms (i.e., 0.2 s), the contact angle directly drops to 0°, achieving complete electrolyte absorption and rapid wetting. To further verify the macroscopic electrolyte absorption capacity of the separator, the droplet penetration state during battery electrolyte filling was simulated (Figure 3b). Within the observation window of 0 to 10 s, electrolyte droplets deposited on the surfaces of commercial PP and PP/PE/PP separators consistently maintained a spherical cap shape without significant lateral spreading, demonstrating that the liquid surface tensi on is difficult to overcome without external force. In contrast, when an electrolyte droplet falls onto the PI-NaCl separator surface, it rapidly penetrates into the separator interior and spreads out extensively in all directions within just 2 s. From 5 to 10 s, the electrolyte has completely permeated and covered the entire visible area of the separator (intuitively manifested as a clear and uniform darkening of the separator due to electrolyte absorption). The PI-NaCl composite separator exhibits an overwhelming advantage in electrolyte wettability compared to commercial polyolefin separators. This excellent lyophilic performance is not only attributable to the strong capillary effect generated by the highly developed three-dimensionally interconnected porous network revealed in previous characterizations but also stems from the strong dipole–dipole interactions between the abundant polar groups (such as imide rings and carbonyl groups) in the polyimide (PI) molecular backbone and the polar solvent molecules of the electrolyte. In practical battery applications, this instantaneous and complete wetting characteristic can significantly shorten the formation and aging time during battery manufacturing, greatly improve the electrolyte retention of the separator, and effectively reduce the charge transfer resistance at the electrode/separator interface, thereby providing critical interfacial assurance for ensuring uniform ionic flux under high-rate charge/discharge and achieving long cycle life.
While pursuing high-energy-density lithium-ion batteries, battery safety, particularly the ability to resist thermal runaway, has become an extremely core evaluation indicator. As the physical barrier isolating the positive and negative electrodes, the thermal stability and dimensional integrity of the separator under high-temperature environments directly determine whether an internal short circuit will occur in the battery. So, the heat resistance of the PI-NaCl separator was systematically evaluated through thermogravimetric analysis and gradient (TGA/DTG) and macroscopic thermal shrinkage experiments. TGA and DTG tests were employed to assess the intrinsic thermal degradation kinetics of the materials. The TGA curves shown in Figure 4a indicate that the commercial trilayer PP/PE/PP composite separator exhibits poor heat resistance, beginning significant mass loss when the temperature reaches approximately 200 °C. Its DTG curve (Figure 4b) shows that thermal degradation starts at approximately 180 °C, with a peak at approximately 260 °C, followed by complete decomposition before 500 °C. This low decomposition temperature is an inherent drawback of the aliphatic chain structure of polyolefin materials. In stark contrast, the PI-NaCl separator exhibits exceptionally superior intrinsic thermal stability. Within a wide temperature range up to approximately 450 °C, its mass retention remains almost 100%, without any significant decomposition or volatile release. Combined with the DTG curve (Figure 4b), it can be clearly observed that the PI-NaCl separator only begins to undergo thermal weight loss after 500 °C, with its single and sharp maximum decomposition rate peak appearing at approximately 530 °C. This exceptionally excellent high-temperature tolerance is fundamentally attributed to the highly conjugated aromatic rings and robust imide ring structures in the main chain of the polyimide (PI) macromolecule, which endow the material with high chemical bond dissociation energy. To further simulate the morphological evolution of the separator under extreme heat generation conditions in batteries, heat treatment tests at different temperature gradients for 0.5 h were conducted on the separators. As shown in the macroscopic optical photographs in Figure 4c, at room temperature (25 °C), all separators maintained a flat circular appearance. However, when the ambient temperature increased to 150 °C, both the commercial monolayer PP and trilayer PP/PE/PP separators exhibited significant edge curling and thermal shrinkage deformation. When the temperature was further raised to 200 °C or even 250 °C, the polyolefin separators underwent extremely severe shrinkage, melting, and transparency, completely losing their original structural integrity and mechanical support function. During the extreme high-temperature heating process spanning from room temperature to 250 °C, the PI-NaCl separator exhibited a nearly perfect “zero-shrinkage” characteristic. Even when baked under the harsh thermal abuse condition of 250 °C, the composite separator still perfectly maintained its initial macroscopic dimensions and geometric shape, without any observable curling, wrinkling, or melting signs. The PI-NaCl composite separator not only possesses intrinsic thermal degradation resistance exceeding 500 °C at the molecular level but also exhibits excellent anti-thermal-shrinkage dimensional stability at the macroscopic physical level.
Based on AC impedance spectroscopy testing and quantitative calculations using stainless steel symmetric cells, the bulk ion transport capabilities of different separators in the same electrolyte system were compared, as shown in Figure 5a. The calculation results indicate that the target modified separator (PI-NaCl) exhibits exceptionally superior ion conductivity, with a room-temperature ionic conductivity as high as 1.31 mS cm−1, which is 5.6 times that of the commercial monolayer PP separator (0.23 mS cm−1) and 1.8 times that of the commercial PP/PE/PP trilayer composite separator (0.72 mS cm−1). The NaCl pore-forming modification process successfully constructed a highly interconnected and well-developed three-dimensional porous network within the separator. Compared with commercial polyolefin separators, which are prepared by mechanical stretching and have low porosity and tortuous pores, this porous framework significantly reduces ion transport tortuosity and provides a larger electrolyte accommodation space (high electrolyte retention). The PI-NaCl separator effectively overcomes the physical bottleneck of limited ion transport inherent to conventional polyolefin separators, and its excellent ionic conductivity will fundamentally reduce the ohmic internal resistance of the battery, laying a solid kinetic foundation for achieving high-rate charge/discharge and excellent electrochemical cycling performance. To verify the electrochemical compatibility and kinetic performance of the separators in actual full-cell systems, AC impedance spectroscopy (EIS) tests were conducted on LiFePO4|C. As shown in Figure 5b, the commercial monolayer PP separator exhibits the largest interfacial impedance (approximately 145 Ω), followed by the trilayer composite PP/PE/PP separator (approximately 110 Ω). In contrast, the full cell employing the PI-NaCl composite separator exhibits the most excellent interfacial reaction kinetics, with its charge transfer resistance significantly reduced to the lowest level (approximately 90 Ω). As shown in Figure 5c,d, under DC voltage perturbation, the current of the PI-NaCl-based cell (0.045 mA) is higher than that of the commercial separator (0.043 mA). Combined with the impedance measurements, the apparent lithium-ion transference number of the PI-NaCl separator (0.36) is also superior to that of the commercial PP/PE/PP separator (0.34). This is closely related to the highly developed three-dimensional porous interconnected network and excellent electrolyte wettability within the PI-NaCl separator. It should be noted that the Nyquist arcs of the PI-NaCl-based battery before and after polarization almost perfectly overlap. This demonstrates that the PI-NaCl separator, by virtue of its excellent polar surface affinity and uniform pore distribution, can effectively homogenize the ion flux distribution on the lithium metal surface, resist the interfacial stress and electrode polarization induced by long-term DC polarization, and shows application potential for long-term battery cycling and high-rate performance.
To evaluate the chemical stability of the separators in battery systems, linear sweep voltammetry (LSV) was employed to test the electrochemical stability of different separator systems. As shown in Figure 6, with a gradual increase in the scanning potential, the three separators exhibited significantly different antioxidant behaviors. For the commercial monolayer polypropylene (PP) separator, the response current began to show an obvious upward trend when the potential reached approximately 4.0 V, indicating the onset of oxidative decomposition reactions in the system. For the commercial PP/PE/PP trilayer composite separator, the onset oxidation potential was slightly higher, with a sharp current increase observed at approximately 4.3 V. In contrast, the PI-NaCl separator exhibited exceptionally excellent high-voltage stability. Within a wide potential range up to approximately 4.7 V, the system employing the PI-NaCl separator consistently maintained an extremely low baseline current (close to 0 mA) without significant side reactions. A noticeable oxidation current did not begin to appear until the test potential exceeded 4.7 V. Compared with conventional commercial polyolefin separators (PP and PP/PE/PP), the PI-NaCl separator significantly broadens the electrochemical stability window of the system by approximately 0.4 V to 0.7 V. This significantly enhanced anodic stability is mainly attributed to the excellent intrinsic molecular structure of the polyimide (PI) matrix. The wide electrochemical stability window enables the PI-NaCl separator to effectively resist oxidative degradation at high potentials and makes it highly compatible with high-voltage, high-energy-density battery systems.
To deeply investigate the regulatory effect of the separator on the lithium metal anode deposition/stripping behavior and interfacial stability, galvanostatic cycling and AC impedance tests were conducted on lithium symmetric cells. At a current density of 0.25 mA cm−2 (Figure 7a), the battery with the commercial PP separator exhibited large polarization in the initial cycles and showed voltage fluctuations in the later stage. When the current density was increased to 0.5 mA cm−2 (Figure 7b), the PP separator system exhibited severe voltage oscillations after approximately 200 h, which is typically attributed to uneven lithium deposition leading to dendrite growth, thereby causing micro-short circuits or accumulation of dead lithium. Even at a high current density of 1 mA cm−2 (Figure 7c), the PP separator exhibited extremely large overpotential and was highly unstable. In contrast, the battery employing the PI-NaCl separator exhibited an extremely stable voltage plateau and significantly reduced overpotential under all test conditions. Particularly at 0.5 mA cm−2, it cycled stably for 300 h without any signs of short circuit. This result strongly demonstrates that the PI-NaCl separator can effectively homogenize the lithium-ion flux, induce uniform lithium deposition, and thereby strongly suppress the nucleation and growth of lithium dendrites at both physical and chemical levels. To reveal the evolution of interfacial dynamics during cycling, electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) tests were performed on different separator systems before cycling and after 100 cycles at 0.5 mA cm−2. According to the Nyquist curve analysis, the interfacial impedance of batteries with the commercial PP (Figure 7f) and PP/PE/PP (Figure 7e) separators increased significantly by 34 Ω and 21 Ω, respectively. This indicates that as dendrites continuously grow and pierce the solid electrolyte interphase (SEI) film, fresh lithium is constantly exposed and undergoes side reactions with the electrolyte, leading to continuous thickening of the SEI film. In contrast, the PI-NaCl separator system (Figure 7d) exhibited an extremely small impedance increase in only 11.5 Ω after 100 cycles. (The cross-sectional SEM images of PI-NaCl separator before cycling and after 100 cycles are shown in Figure S2). This minimal impedance evolution confirms that the PI-NaCl separator not only effectively promotes lithium deposition/stripping but also assists in constructing a thin and highly stable SEI film on the lithium metal anode surface. This stable interfacial structure significantly reduces the continuous consumption of the electrolyte, lowers the energy barrier for interfacial charge transfer, and endows the lithium metal battery with excellent long-term cycling interfacial stability and electrochemical kinetic performance.
To further evaluate the electrochemical performance and stability of the separators in practical full-cell systems, LiFePO4 (LFP)||C full cells were assembled, and their discharge behavior under different current densities was compared in detail. Figure 8a shows the long-term cycling curves of the two separators at 0.1C. It can be seen that the PI-NaCl-based cell exhibits excellent capacity retention and high Coulombic efficiency over 150 cycles. Figure 8b–d show the specific discharge capacity-voltage curves of full cells with the commercial PP separator and the PI-NaCl separator at different rates from 0.1C to 1C. The results indicate that at 0.1C, the specific discharge capacity of the PI-NaCl-based cell reaches approximately 115 mAh/g, while that of the commercial PP-based cell is significantly lower (approximately 80 mAh/g), and its discharge curve exhibits severe sloping with an indistinct voltage plateau. This phenomenon suggests that the conventional PP separator, due to its poor electrolyte wettability or limited ionic conductivity, leads to extremely large initial interfacial impedance and severe voltage polarization inside the battery. As the discharge rate gradually increases (from 0.2 C to 1 C), the discharge platforms of both systems exhibit varying degrees of decline due to intensified ohmic polarization and concentration polarization. However, the PI-NaCl separator system exhibits excellent tolerance to high rates. As shown in Figure 8d, even at a high rate of 1 C, the PI-NaCl-based cell still retains a relatively complete discharge platform characteristic and maintains an effective discharge capacity of approximately 70 mAh/g. In contrast, for the PP separator system, when the rate increases to 1C, the large internal polarization causes the voltage to instantly reach the cutoff voltage (2.8 V), and its discharge capacity decays precipitously. (The charge–discharge specific capacity-voltage profiles at 0.1 C–1 C are shown in Figure S3). Precisely because the PI-NaCl separator can significantly reduce charge/discharge polarization at high rates, ensuring efficient and uniform lithium-ion transport between the positive and negative electrodes, it exhibits excellent capacity recovery capability during continuous rate step tests. Compared with the conventional PP separator, the PI-NaCl composite separator, by virtue of its optimized pore structure and excellent electrolyte affinity, significantly improves the lithium-ion transport kinetics inside the full cell, greatly reduces electrochemical polarization, and promotes excellent electrochemical stability and cycle life of the LFP full cell under high-rate conditions.
To evaluate the high-temperature tolerance of the separator under practical full-cell operating conditions and its ability to suppress thermally induced internal short circuits, assembled full cells were charged to approximately 3.2 V and then placed in a high-temperature environment of 80 °C for a continuous 8 h rest period, during which their voltage evolution over time was monitored in situ in real time. As shown in Figure 9, the two separator systems exhibited distinctly different voltage retention capabilities under high-temperature stress. For the full cell with the commercial polypropylene (PP) separator, during the high-temperature rest stage, the voltage curve not only exhibited continuous fluctuations and instability but also, after approximately 6 h of continuous heating, underwent a severe “cliff-like” sudden voltage drop, rapidly falling below 3.1 V. This phenomenon is attributed to the poor thermal stability of the conventional polyolefin PP separator: under prolonged high-temperature exposure at 80 °C, the PP separator underwent severe thermal dimensional shrinkage or local melting deformation, causing the separator to lose its physical isolation function, leading to contact between the positive and negative electrodes and inducing micro-short circuits and severe self-discharge in the battery. The full cell based on the PI-NaCl separator exhibited excellent high-temperature thermal stability. Throughout the entire 8 h rigorous high-temperature aging test at 80 °C, its voltage curve remained consistently around 3.2 V, without any observable signs of significant voltage decay, sudden drop, or fluctuation. This is mainly attributed to the excellent intrinsic heat resistance and structural rigidity of polyimide. Thus, this outstanding high-temperature structural stability of PI-NaCl ensures reliable isolation between the positive and negative electrodes, fundamentally blocks the risk of thermally induced internal short circuits, and significantly enhances the safety performance and operational reliability of the full cell under extreme thermal environments.

4. Conclusions

In this paper, a polyimide-based modified separator with high porosity, excellent thermal stability, and effective ion transfer was successfully prepared by introducing NaCl as a pore-forming template. The introduction of a cross-scale NaCl template facilitated the construction of a uniform micro-nano pore network while maintaining the extremely high chemical stability of the polyimide membrane. In addition, this separator exhibits excellent electrolyte affinity (the contact angle instantly drops to 0°) and outstanding thermal structure stability up to 250 °C. Benefiting from the unique porous structure and polar interface, the PI-NaCl separator significantly enhances ionic conductivity and lithium-ion transference number while greatly reducing the interfacial charge transfer resistance. In lithium symmetric cell tests, this separator effectively homogenizes the lithium ion flux, inhibits lithium dendrite growth under different current densities, and achieves long-term stable stripping/plating cycling. Furthermore, the assembled LiFePO4||C full cell exhibits rate capability and long-term cycling capacity retention far superior to those of commercial PP separators and also achieves stable voltage retention under high-temperature conditions of 80 °C. In summary, this modified separator, which combines high electrochemical performance with intrinsic safety, provides a highly promising engineering solution for the development of next-generation high-energy-density and high-safety lithium ion batteries.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/en19112635/s1.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, B.S. and X.G.; methodology, Y.W. (Yan Wang) and Y.W. (Yichao Wang); validation, W.J. and H.F.; formal analysis, F.C.; original draft preparation, S.Y. and P.S.; supervision and methodology, M.H. and X.G. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in this study are included in the article/Supplementary Materials. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding authors.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Key Laboratory of Electrochemical Energy Safety, Ministry of Emergency Management, No. EES2025KF05 and supported by the Natural Science Foundation of Henan Province, China (Grant Nos. 242300420004 and 252300421951) and supported by the Henan Key Laboratory of Cable Advanced Materials and Intelligent Manufacturing (CAMIM202502).

Conflicts of Interest

Authors Sen Yu, Xuewen Geng, and Ming Hu were employed by the companies Key Laboratory of Electrochemical Energy Safety, Ministry of Emergency Management; XYZ Storage Technology Corp., Ltd., and China Power International Development Limited. Peng Sun, Yi-chao Wang, Yan Wang, and Wentao Jin were employed by the companies Key Laboratory of Electrochemical Energy Safety, Ministry of Emergency Management, and XYZ Storage Technology Corp., Ltd. Hongkai Fan was employed by the company XYZ Storage Technology Corp., Ltd. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

References

  1. Tarascon, J.M.; Armand, M. Issues and challenges facing rechargeable lithium batteries. Nature 2001, 414, 359–367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Armand, M.; Tarascon, J.M. Building better batteries. Nature 2008, 451, 652–657. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Goodenough, J.B.; Park, K.S. The Li-ion rechargeable battery: A perspective. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013, 135, 1167–1176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Dunn, B.; Kamath, H.; Tarascon, J.M. Electrical energy storage for the grid: A battery of choices. Science 2011, 334, 928–935. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Whittingham, M.S. History, evolution, and future status of energy storage. Proc. IEEE 2012, 100, 1518–1534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Lu, L.; Han, X.; Li, J.; Hua, J.; Ouyang, M. A review on the key issues for lithium-ion battery management in electric vehicles. J. Power Sources 2013, 226, 272–288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Nykvist, B.; Nilsson, M. Rapidly falling costs of battery packs for electric vehicles. Nat. Clim. Change 2015, 5, 329–332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Manthiram, A. An outlook on lithium ion battery technology. ACS Cent. Sci. 2017, 3, 1063–1069. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Scrosati, B.; Garche, J. Lithium batteries: Status, prospects and future. J. Power Sources 2010, 195, 2419–2430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Marom, R.; Amalraj, S.F.; Leifer, N.; Jacob, D.; Aurbach, D. A review of advanced and practical lithium battery materials. J. Mater. Chem. 2011, 21, 9938–9954. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Yang, Z.; Zhang, J.; Kintner-Meyer, M.C.W.; Lu, X.; Choi, D.; Lemmon, J.P.; Liu, J. Electrochemical energy storage for green grid. Chem. Rev. 2011, 111, 3577–3613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Bruce, P.G.; Freunberger, S.A.; Hardwick, L.J.; Tarascon, J.-M. Li–O2 and Li–S batteries with high energy storage. Nat. Mater. 2012, 11, 19–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Chu, S.; Majumdar, A. Opportunities and challenges for a sustainable energy future. Nature 2012, 488, 294–303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Grey, C.P.; Tarascon, J.M. Sustainability and in situ monitoring in battery development. Nat. Mater. 2017, 16, 45–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Choi, J.W.; Aurbach, D. Promise and reality of post-lithium-ion batteries with high energy densities. Nat. Rev. Mater. 2016, 1, 16013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Nitta, N.; Wu, F.; Lee, J.T.; Yushin, G. Li-ion battery materials: Present and future. Mater. Today 2015, 18, 252–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Manthiram, A.; Yu, X.; Wang, S. Lithium battery chemistries enabled by solid-state electrolytes. Nat. Rev. Mater. 2017, 2, 16103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Zhang, S.S. A review on the separators of liquid electrolyte Li-ion batteries. J. Power Sources 2007, 164, 351–364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Arora, P.; Zhang, Z. Battery separators. Chem. Rev. 2004, 104, 4419–4462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Lee, H.; Yanilmaz, M.; Toprakci, O.; Fu, K.; Zhang, X. A review of recent developments in membrane separators for rechargeable lithium-ion batteries. Energy Environ. Sci. 2014, 7, 3857–3886. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Costa, C.M.; Silva, M.M.; Lanceros-Méndez, S. Battery separators based on vinylidene fluoride (VDF) polymers and copolymers for lithium ion battery applications. RSC Adv. 2013, 3, 11404–11417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Huang, X. Separator technologies for lithium-ion batteries. J. Solid State Electrochem. 2011, 15, 649–662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Li, A.; Yuen, A.C.Y.; Wang, W.; De Cachinho Cordeiro, I.M.; Wang, C.; Chen, T.B.Y.; Zhang, J.; Chan, Q.N.; Yeoh, G.H. A review on lithium-ion battery separators towards enhanced safety performances and modelling approaches. Molecules 2021, 26, 478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Costa, C.M.; Lee, Y.H.; Kim, J.H.; Lee, S.Y.; Lanceros-Mendez, S. Recent advances on separator membranes for lithium-ion battery applications: From porous membranes to solid electrolytes. Energy Storage Mater. 2019, 22, 346–375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Yang, M.; Hou, J. Membranes in lithium ion batteries. Membranes 2012, 2, 367–383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Mun, S.C.; Won, J.H. Manufacturing processes of microporous polyolefin separators for lithium-ion batteries and correlations between mechanical and physical properties. Crystals 2021, 11, 1013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Balakrishnan, P.G.; Ramesh, R.; Kumar, T.P. Safety mechanisms in lithium-ion batteries. J. Power Sources 2006, 155, 401–414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Doughty, D.H.; Roth, E.P. A general discussion of Li ion battery safety. Electrochem. Soc. Interface 2012, 21, 37–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Wang, Q.; Ping, P.; Zhao, X.; Chu, G.; Sun, J.; Chen, C. Thermal runaway caused fire and explosion of lithium ion battery. J. Power Sources 2012, 208, 210–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Feng, X.; Ouyang, M.; Liu, X.; Lu, L.; Xia, Y.; He, X. Thermal runaway mechanism of lithium ion battery for electric vehicles: A review. Energy Storage Mater. 2018, 10, 246–267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Yang, Y.; Wang, R.; Shen, Z.; Yu, Q.; Xiong, R.; Shen, W. Towards a safer lithium-ion batteries: A critical review on cause, characteristics, warning and disposal strategy for thermal runaway. Adv. Appl. Energy 2023, 11, 100146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Xie, Y.; Zou, H.; Xiang, H.; Xia, R.; Liang, D.; Shi, P.; Dai, S.; Wang, H. Enhancement on the wettability of lithium battery separator toward nonaqueous electrolytes. J. Membr. Sci. 2016, 503, 25–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Davoodabadi, A.; Jin, C.; Wood, D.L., III; Singler, T.J.; Li, J. On electrolyte wetting through lithium-ion battery separators. Extrem. Mech. Lett. 2020, 40, 100960. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Wang, S.; Ma, Z.; Zhao, W.; Guo, Z.; Zhao, H.; Ren, L. Deterioration mechanism of the wettability of a lithium-ion battery separator induced by low-temperature discharge. Appl. Energy 2024, 364, 123136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Love, C.T. Thermomechanical analysis and durability of commercial micro-porous polymer Li-ion battery separators. J. Power Sources 2011, 196, 2905–2912. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Yang, Y.; Wang, W.; Meng, G.; Zhang, J. Function-directed design of battery separators based on microporous polyolefin membranes. J. Mater. Chem. A 2022, 10, 14137–14170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Jeon, H.; Yeon, D.; Lee, T.; Park, J.; Ryou, M.-H.; Lee, Y.M. A water-based Al2O3 ceramic coating for polyethylene-based microporous separators for lithium-ion batteries. J. Power Sources 2016, 315, 161–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Deimede, V.; Elmasides, C. Separators for lithium-ion batteries: A review on the production processes and recent developments. Energy Technol. 2015, 3, 453–468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Ding, Y.; Jiang, Y.; Zeng, C.; Jin, H. Recent progress of advanced separators for Li-ion batteries. J. Mater. Sci. 2024, 59, 12154–12176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Shi, C.; Zhang, P.; Chen, L.; Yang, P.; Zhao, J. Effect of a thin ceramic-coating layer on thermal and electrochemical properties of polyethylene separator for lithium-ion batteries. J. Power Sources 2014, 270, 547–553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Miao, Y.E.; Zhu, G.N.; Hou, H.; Xia, Y.Y.; Liu, T. Electrospun polyimide nanofiber-based nonwoven separators for lithium-ion batteries. J. Power Sources 2013, 226, 82–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Lin, C.E.; Zhang, H.; Song, Y.Z.; Zhang, Y.; Yuan, J.J.; Zhu, B.K. Carboxylated polyimide separator with excellent lithium ion transport properties for a high-power density lithium-ion battery. J. Mater. Chem. A 2018, 6, 991–998. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Zhang, H.; Lin, C.E.; Zhou, M.Y.; John, A.E.; Zhu, B.K. High thermal resistance polyimide separators prepared via soluble precusor and non-solvent induced phase separation process for lithium ion batteries. Electrochim. Acta 2016, 187, 125–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Schematic diagram and digital photographs of the preparation of a porous polyimide based membrane using NaCl as template.
Figure 1. Schematic diagram and digital photographs of the preparation of a porous polyimide based membrane using NaCl as template.
Energies 19 02635 g001
Figure 2. SEM images of PI-NaCl film at top view (a), cross section with low (b) and high (c) magnification; (d) Raman spectrum; (e) X-ray diffraction test; (f) Tensile stress–strain curve.
Figure 2. SEM images of PI-NaCl film at top view (a), cross section with low (b) and high (c) magnification; (d) Raman spectrum; (e) X-ray diffraction test; (f) Tensile stress–strain curve.
Energies 19 02635 g002
Figure 3. Characterization of the wetting property of liquid electrolytes. (a) Contact angle test between separator and liquid electrolyte at various time where millisecond unit is adopted for PI-NaCl; (b) Recorded of the electrolyte diffusion behavior by digital photos.
Figure 3. Characterization of the wetting property of liquid electrolytes. (a) Contact angle test between separator and liquid electrolyte at various time where millisecond unit is adopted for PI-NaCl; (b) Recorded of the electrolyte diffusion behavior by digital photos.
Energies 19 02635 g003
Figure 4. Thermal stability test. (a) Thermogravimetric Analysis (TGA) for PP/PE/PP and PI-NaCl; (b) corresponded differential TGA curves; (c) Photos of PP, PP/PE/PP and PI-NaCl after treatment at 25 °C, 150 °C, 200 °C and 250 °C for 0.5 h respectively.
Figure 4. Thermal stability test. (a) Thermogravimetric Analysis (TGA) for PP/PE/PP and PI-NaCl; (b) corresponded differential TGA curves; (c) Photos of PP, PP/PE/PP and PI-NaCl after treatment at 25 °C, 150 °C, 200 °C and 250 °C for 0.5 h respectively.
Energies 19 02635 g004
Figure 5. Ion dynamics test. (a) ohm impedance test by symmetric cell with stainless steel as the electrodes; (b) LiFePO4||C full cell AC impedance with the frequency range of 0.1 Hz–10 kHz. Chronopotentiometry test and the corresponded AC impedance for (c) PI-NaCl and (d) PP/PE/PP film based symmetric Li||Li coin cell.
Figure 5. Ion dynamics test. (a) ohm impedance test by symmetric cell with stainless steel as the electrodes; (b) LiFePO4||C full cell AC impedance with the frequency range of 0.1 Hz–10 kHz. Chronopotentiometry test and the corresponded AC impedance for (c) PI-NaCl and (d) PP/PE/PP film based symmetric Li||Li coin cell.
Energies 19 02635 g005
Figure 6. Linear voltammetry scan for PI-NaCl, PP/PE/PP and PP based asymmetric coin cell where stainless steel and lithium are regarded as the cathode, anode respectively.
Figure 6. Linear voltammetry scan for PI-NaCl, PP/PE/PP and PP based asymmetric coin cell where stainless steel and lithium are regarded as the cathode, anode respectively.
Energies 19 02635 g006
Figure 7. Electrochemical performance for Li||Li coin cell. (ac) Cycling performance for PPand PI-NaCl based cell with the current density of 0.25 mA cm−2, 0.5 mA cm−2 and 1 mA cm−2; (df) The collected EIS (electrochemical impedance spectroscopy) at fresh and 100th for PI-NaCl, PP/PE/PP and PP based cell under 0.5 mA cm−2, respectively.
Figure 7. Electrochemical performance for Li||Li coin cell. (ac) Cycling performance for PPand PI-NaCl based cell with the current density of 0.25 mA cm−2, 0.5 mA cm−2 and 1 mA cm−2; (df) The collected EIS (electrochemical impedance spectroscopy) at fresh and 100th for PI-NaCl, PP/PE/PP and PP based cell under 0.5 mA cm−2, respectively.
Energies 19 02635 g007
Figure 8. Electrochemical performance of LiFePO4||C full cell. (a) cycling stability and the coulombic efficiency for PP and PI-NaCl based cell at 0.1 C; (b) rate capabilities from 0.1C to 1 C; and Typical discharge voltage-capacity curves at various rates for PP (c,d) PI-NaCl based full cell.
Figure 8. Electrochemical performance of LiFePO4||C full cell. (a) cycling stability and the coulombic efficiency for PP and PI-NaCl based cell at 0.1 C; (b) rate capabilities from 0.1C to 1 C; and Typical discharge voltage-capacity curves at various rates for PP (c,d) PI-NaCl based full cell.
Energies 19 02635 g008
Figure 9. Monitored OCV (open-circuit voltage) of PP and PI-NaCl based charged to 3.2 V LiFePO4||C cells in 80 °C environment.
Figure 9. Monitored OCV (open-circuit voltage) of PP and PI-NaCl based charged to 3.2 V LiFePO4||C cells in 80 °C environment.
Energies 19 02635 g009
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Yu, S.; Sun, P.; Geng, X.; Wang, Y.; Wang, Y.; Jin, W.; Fan, H.; Cui, F.; Sun, B.; Hu, M. Hierarchical Porous Polyimide Separator Prepared by Sodium Chloride Salt for High-Performance Lithium Ion Batteries. Energies 2026, 19, 2635. https://doi.org/10.3390/en19112635

AMA Style

Yu S, Sun P, Geng X, Wang Y, Wang Y, Jin W, Fan H, Cui F, Sun B, Hu M. Hierarchical Porous Polyimide Separator Prepared by Sodium Chloride Salt for High-Performance Lithium Ion Batteries. Energies. 2026; 19(11):2635. https://doi.org/10.3390/en19112635

Chicago/Turabian Style

Yu, Sen, Peng Sun, Xuewen Geng, Yichao Wang, Yan Wang, Wentao Jin, Hongkai Fan, Fengfeng Cui, Bin Sun, and Ming Hu. 2026. "Hierarchical Porous Polyimide Separator Prepared by Sodium Chloride Salt for High-Performance Lithium Ion Batteries" Energies 19, no. 11: 2635. https://doi.org/10.3390/en19112635

APA Style

Yu, S., Sun, P., Geng, X., Wang, Y., Wang, Y., Jin, W., Fan, H., Cui, F., Sun, B., & Hu, M. (2026). Hierarchical Porous Polyimide Separator Prepared by Sodium Chloride Salt for High-Performance Lithium Ion Batteries. Energies, 19(11), 2635. https://doi.org/10.3390/en19112635

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop