Next Article in Journal
Pulse Train Control Strategy for a Series Capacitor Buck Converter in Discontinuous Conduction Mode
Previous Article in Journal
Unit-Scale Dynamic Reserve Updating in Fracture–Vuggy Carbonates Using Water-Body- and Heterogeneity-Corrected Dynamic Methods
Previous Article in Special Issue
Review of Methods and Models for Forecasting Electricity Consumption
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Article

Topology-Constrained Flexibility Assessment of Adjustable Resources in the Regional Electricity Spot Market

1
China Southern Power Grid Power Dispatch and Control Center, Guangzhou 510663, China
2
Beijing Tsintergy Technology Co., Ltd., Beijing 100084, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Energies 2026, 19(11), 2501; https://doi.org/10.3390/en19112501
Submission received: 20 April 2026 / Revised: 15 May 2026 / Accepted: 16 May 2026 / Published: 22 May 2026
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Electricity Market Modeling Trends in Power Systems: 2nd Edition)

Abstract

The transition toward modern power systems with high renewable penetration has significantly increased the demand for system flexibility. However, existing reserve capacity assessment methods often overestimate the actual deliverable flexibility by neglecting network topology constraints. This paper proposes a topology-constrained flexibility assessment framework based on the Regional Security-Constrained Economic Dispatch (R-SCED) model to quantify the true deliverable reserve of adjustable resources in electricity spot markets. Unlike conventional approaches, the proposed framework explicitly captures the spatial distribution of load increments and their interactions with transmission constraints. Through multi-scenario analysis, we reveal a critical “capacity restriction effect”, where network bottlenecks drastically reduce the theoretically available reserve. Case studies on an 88-node multi-area system show that the actual upward flexibility is reduced from a theoretical level of 67,000 MW to a constrained range of 5200–19,000 MW. The results demonstrate that flexibility in modern power systems is fundamentally limited by network topology rather than generation capacity, highlighting the necessity of topology-aware reserve assessment for real-time market operation. This work provides important insights for improving dispatch strategies and enhancing system flexibility under high renewable penetration.
Keywords: regional market; adjustable resource; network constraints; adjustable load; security-constrained economic dispatch regional market; adjustable resource; network constraints; adjustable load; security-constrained economic dispatch

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zhan, B.; Shan, Z.; Zhang, X.; Wang, K.; Yan, R.; Qiu, S.; Fan, Z.; Lin, Q. Topology-Constrained Flexibility Assessment of Adjustable Resources in the Regional Electricity Spot Market. Energies 2026, 19, 2501. https://doi.org/10.3390/en19112501

AMA Style

Zhan B, Shan Z, Zhang X, Wang K, Yan R, Qiu S, Fan Z, Lin Q. Topology-Constrained Flexibility Assessment of Adjustable Resources in the Regional Electricity Spot Market. Energies. 2026; 19(11):2501. https://doi.org/10.3390/en19112501

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zhan, Bochun, Zhengbo Shan, Xixi Zhang, Ke Wang, Rong Yan, Shengmin Qiu, Zhantao Fan, and Qingbiao Lin. 2026. "Topology-Constrained Flexibility Assessment of Adjustable Resources in the Regional Electricity Spot Market" Energies 19, no. 11: 2501. https://doi.org/10.3390/en19112501

APA Style

Zhan, B., Shan, Z., Zhang, X., Wang, K., Yan, R., Qiu, S., Fan, Z., & Lin, Q. (2026). Topology-Constrained Flexibility Assessment of Adjustable Resources in the Regional Electricity Spot Market. Energies, 19(11), 2501. https://doi.org/10.3390/en19112501

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop