Lightning Surge Analysis on a Large Scale Grid-Connected Solar Photovoltaic System

Abstract

Solar photovoltaic (PV) farms currently play a vital role in the generation of electrical power in different countries, such as Malaysia, which is moving toward the use of renewable energy. Malaysia is one of the countries with abundant sunlight and thus can use solar PV farms as alternative sources for electricity generation. However, lightning strikes frequently occur in the country. Being installed in open and flat areas, solar PV farms, especially their electronic components, are at great risk of damage caused by lightning. In this paper, the effects of lightning currents with different peak currents and waveshapes on grid-connected solar PV farms were determined to approximate the level of transient effect that can damage solar PV modules, inverters and transformers. Depending on the location of the solar PV farm, engineer can obtain information on the peak current and median current of the site from the lightning location system (LLS) and utilise the results obtained in this study to appropriately assign an SPD to protect the solar panel, inverter and the main panel that connected to the grid. Therefore, the simulation results serve as the basis for controlling the effects of lightning strikes on electrical equipment and power grids where it provides proper justification on the ‘where to be installed’ and ‘what is the rating’ of the SPD. This judgment and decision will surely reduce the expensive cost of repair and replacement of electrical equipment damages due to the lightning.

1. Introduction

Solar photovoltaic (PV) systems have moved to the forefront of public and industry awareness on sustainable and renewable energy sources, which are alternatives to fossil fuels for electricity generation. Malaysia is fortunate to be one of the countries that have massive potentials for the development of solar PV power systems. The country is subjected daily to high levels of radiation and has a high number of sunny days [1]. It also has an average daily solar radiation of approximately 4.5 kWh/m² and 4–8 h of sunshine daily [2]. On average, the outside temperature in Malaysia is 33 °C at day time and 23 °C at night [3]. However, on the other perspective, Malaysia is also experiencing and highly exposed to lightning events and thunderstorms, having an average thunder level of 180–260 days per year [4] and also known as the ‘Crown of lightning’. Thus, it causes a lot of problems when it comes to the needs for lightning protection system due to the nature of installation for such systems, which are outdoor locations/sites where it gives high probability of getting struck by the lightning, especially those in the lightning-prone areas.

Solar PV systems are typically installed in a wide open area to maximise their surface areas and prevent shading effects, which can reduce their performance. Often encountered near towers, buildings, telephone and electric poles, and trees, shading can result in multiple peaks in P-V characteristics [5]. Open areas are vulnerable to high solar radiation and air humidity, which promote lightning events; notably, solar radiation, air humidity and frequency of lightning discharge are associated with one another [6].

A solar PV farm hit by lightning sustains damage and meltdown or fracture in its electronic components. Moreover, lightning-induced surges lead to short-circuit failures in the system (permanent damage) as the energy of a lightning strike far exceeds the maximum energy that can be tolerated by the equipment (meltdown or fracture) [7]. The extremely high transient current and transient voltage caused by the lightning strike render solar PV systems and other electronic components, such as inverters, vulnerable to serious damage. Repair or replacement of damaged electronic components is highly expensive. Therefore, the purpose of this research is to characterise transient current and voltage to provide an overview of the consequences that might occur when lightning strikes a solar PV system. It is a fact that many PV systems, at least in Malaysia, are not properly protected against lightning. Due to this exposure, the PV systems may be liable to suffer a crucial impact in a way that can lead towards severe damage; for instance, failure of the electrical and electronic parts in the building or PV installation and disruption of their normal operation. Furthermore, the biggest issue appeared when the systems are integrated and fed to the grid (also known as grid-connected installation) where there is no specific international standard available for reference, except the German DIN EN 62305-3 (Supplement 5) and Malaysia’s brief MS 1837-2010 documents. However, due to the fact that it is too brief, many confusions raised from many aspects such as the protection level to be considered, placement of the surge protective devices (SPD) and its rating and the connection or bonding between the panels.

Therefore, this study provides crucial information on the effect of lightning on large scale installation. In this study, a solar PV system was modelled using Power System Computer Aided Diagram/Electromagnetic Transient Direct Current (PSCAD/EMTDC) software. The performance of the solar PV system against the lightning effect was observed using different peak currents with different lightning current waveshapes. Our aim is to provide references and guidelines for the installation of lightning protection systems (LPSs) in solar PV farms. It is not the proposal for determining the rating of Surge Protective Device (SPD) to be used. Instead, it is meant to provide a feasibility study prior to the commissioning of the system by the authority.

2. Background of Solar PV System in Malaysia

A solar PV system is an electrically integrated assembly of a PV array, inverter and other components, which constitute a power generation unit. Solar PV modules (also known as solar PV panels) contain several PV cells that convert sunlight energy into electricity. The solar PV modules are wired using a series connection to form PV strings, which are then connected to one another through parallel connection to form a PV array. PV cells are made from light-sensitive semiconductor materials either in crystalline-silicon or thin-film form. Figure 1 illustrates the PV cell family tree.

Crystalline silicon PV cells were the first developed solar panel components [8] and have continued to be mainly used in solar PV modules [9]. Approximately 90% of current installations of solar PV modules uses crystalline silicon, although thin films are starting to gain widespread acceptance [10]. The crystalline silicon PV cells can be subdivided into monocrystalline (also known as single-crystalline) and polycrystalline (also known as multi-crystalline) silicon [11].

Monocrystalline silicon has a solid crystalline structure with continuous crystal lattice and without any grain boundary from the entire bulk area to the edges [12]. In contrast, poly-crystalline silicon contains many small crystalline grains with random orientations. The cell efficiencies of monocrystalline silicon are considerably higher than that of polycrystalline silicon [13]. Owing to the current price decline in wafer-based solar cells, thin-film solar cells, which are expected to be cheap, become uneconomical. Moreover, thin-film cells have lower efficiency than crystalline silicon solar cells [12].

Polycrystalline, monocrystalline and amorphous solar PV modules, which exhibit different characteristics and efficiencies, are commonly installed in Malaysia. Monocrystalline solar PV modules are the most installed (48%), followed by polycrystalline solar PV modules (38%) and lastly by thin-film solar PV modules (14%) [14]. However, according to [15], where the performance ratio of each type of PV module, polycrystalline solar PV modules are the most suitable to the climate conditions in Malaysia.

Solar PV systems can be classified into off-grid connected (standalone), grid-connected and hybrid systems. The standalone systems consist of solar PV modules, loads and batteries for storage and are usually installed in buildings with power consumption of less than 4 kW. Grid-connected systems are connected to a grid system and require no battery and typically used when power consumption is more than 100 kW. Hybrid systems are a combination of solar PV modules and diesel, gas or wind generator. Meanwhile, a solar PV system is composed of few components when not connected to a grid system. All the components are described in

Table 1. Components of a solar PV system [16].

Component	Description
Solar PV	Crystalline silicon PV module type must comply with MS IEC 61215. Thin film PV module type must comply with MS IEC 61646.
Inverter	Component that converts DC output from solar PV to AC output, which can be delivered to the load and grid The inverter must comply in accordance with MS IEC 61000-3-2, MS IEC 61000-6-3, MS IEC 61000-6-4, MS IEC 60364-7-712 and MS 1992 or IEEE 1547 and IEEE 1547.1.
Switching device (circuit breaker)	Used for protection and/or disconnecting when fault occurs Voltage rating greater than $V_{OC STC ARRAY = }{V}_{OC STC MOD }\times N_{s }$ Current rating of $1.5 \times I_{SC STC MOD}\le I_{TRIP}\le 2\times I_{SC STC MOD}$
Fuse	Safety device to protect against overcurrent Used for rated DC to DC and rated AC to AC Voltage rating equal or greater than $V_{OC STC ARRAY = }{V}_{OC STC MOD}\times N_s$ Current rating of $\ge 1.5\mathrm{and}2\mathrm{time}{I}_{SCSTCString}$
PV kWh meter	Records AC electricity (in kilowatt per hour) generated by solar PV Connected between the AC breaker and AC grid isolator main switch
Batteries	Store power generated during the day to be used at night Usually for off-grid connected systems

Description: $V_{OC STC ARRAY }=$ Open circuit voltage at standard test condition of a PV array. $V_{OC STC MOD }=$ Open circuit voltage of a PV at standard test condition. $I_{SC STC MOD} =$ Short circuit current of a PV module or PV string at standard test. $I_{SC STC String}=$ Short circuit current of a solar PV string at standard test condition. $N_s =$ The number of series-connected PV modules in any PV string of the PV array.

.

3. Lightning Overview and Differences in Modelling Lightning Current Waveshape

Lightning is an electrical discharge in the atmosphere and typically occurs during thunderstorms. Lightning can be categorised as intracloud lightning (sheet lightning), cloud-to-cloud lightning (heat lightning), cloud-to-air lightning and cloud-to-ground lightning. Intracloud lightning is the most common type of lightning and appears completely within a cloud. Cloud-to-cloud lightning occurs between two or more separate clouds without contact to the ground. Cloud-to-air lightning refers to a discharge jumping from cloud to clear air. Lastly, cloud-to-ground lightning occurs between a cloud and the ground and is initiated by a downward-moving leader stroke and upward-moving leader stroke.

Nearly 75% of lightning discharges are intracloud, cloud-to-cloud and cloud-to-air lightning, while 25% are cloud-to-ground. Although constituting only a quarter of all lightning occurrences, cloud-to-ground lightning is the most destructive of the lightning types and hazardous to human life [17]. Approximately 90% of the cloud-to-ground lightning occurrences have downward negative lightning flashes, while 10% or less have downward positive lightning flashes [18]. The upward discharge occurs only from tall objects that are 100 m or higher or a moderate height structure located on the top of a mountain.

Lightning current waveshapes can be characterised through different mathematical expressions. Double exponential and Heidler function are the two mathematical expressions for lightning current waveshapes and widely used in studying the effects of lightning. The double exponential [19] is shown in Equation (1).

$$i\left(t\right)=I_m[e^{-\alpha t}-e^{-\beta t}]$$

(1)

where $I_m$ is the peak current while α and β are constants and used to determine the lightning current waveshape. These two important parameters are used to derive the tail time $t_t$ and front time $t_f$ respectively.

The was proposed by Heidler [20] and defined in Equation (2) as follows:

$$i \left(t\right)= \frac{I_m}{\eta }\frac{{(t/{\tau }_1)}^n}{1+{(t/{\tau }_1)}^n}\exp \left(\frac{t}{{\tau }_2}\right)$$

(2)

where

$$\eta =\exp \left[\frac{-{\tau }_1}{{\tau }_2{\left(\raisebox{1ex}{$n{\tau }_2$}\!\left/ \!\raisebox{-1ex}{${\tau }_1$}\right.\right)}^{\left(\raisebox{1ex}{$1$}\!\left/ \!\raisebox{-1ex}{$n+1$}\right.\right)}}\right]$$

(3)

The double exponential function is the simplest equation for the representation of lightning current waveshapes, although the Heidler function provide more realistic results. The reason is that the Heidler function starts when $t=0$, whereas the double exponential starts when $t=1$ µs. Therefore, the Heidler function was used in this study to model the lightning current waveshape.

4. Lightning Standard and Nonstandard Current Waveshapes with Different Amplitudes

According to the IEC and IEEE standards, a lightning impulse current should be at 8/20 µs and 10/350 µs [21] for the surge withstand capability test. The lightning stroke peak current ranges from 2 kA to 200 kA, where the first stroke peak current are typically two to three times as large as the subsequent stroke peak current [22]. In addition, 98% of the peak lightning currents exceed 4 kA, 80% exceed 20 kA, and only 5% exceed 90 kA.

Peak current, $I_m$ front time, t₁ and tail time, t₂ are three important parameters that indicate lightning current waveshape characteristics. The $I_m$ value is the maximum value of the lightning current in the waveshape, $t_1$ is the time interval when current increases from zero to the peak current, and $t_2$ is the time starting from zero to the time where current starts falling off from 50% of the peak current.

Three lightning current waveshapes were modelled in the PSCAD based on the standard (8/20 and 10/350 µs) and a nonstandard values (0.25/100 µs) as depicted in Figure 2, Figure 3 and Figure 4.

5. Lightning Effect on Solar PV Farm and Applicable Standards

Lightning is a major issue in solar PV farms because it can cause damage that often requires high replacement and repair costs and power interruption. Lightning impulses also cause the premature ageing of bypass diodes, power semiconductors and input and output circuits of data systems, which require high repair costs when damaged. Direct or indirect lightning strikes can both seriously damage solar PV panels and components [23].

A direct lightning strike is the ignition of lightning current and generates energy, heat and flash. When direct lightning hits a solar PV module, an extremely strong current flows through the module, resulting in overcurrent and surge overvoltage. Meanwhile, an indirect lightning strike produces induced overvoltage, which is influenced by lightning current characteristics, distance of the solar PV from the lightning, soil resistivity, PV grounding resistance and distance of the lightning protection system [24].

Solar PV farms installed in an open area without high buildings or trees are subjected to high solar radiation and air humidity, and thus have an increased risk of being hit by lightning. The increased risk is mainly attributed to the associations among solar radiation, air humidity and frequency during lightning discharges [6]. The severity of damage in solar PV systems hit by lightning depends on the characteristics of the lightning current waveshape, amplitude of the lightning current, lightning striking point and installed lightning protection system. Moreover, the lightning striking point is inversely proportional to the distance of the point impact strike by the lightning [25].

In a solar PV farm, the DC cables are used to interconnect individual modules to form a PV generation device where each module cable is coupled to a string that leads to the generator junction box. A main DC cable connects the generator junction box to the inverter. The long cable loops formed from the DC cables can lead to high-induced surge during a lightning event [26]. Thus, many studies investigated the effects of long cable loops on solar PV systems and the difference between air terminal lightning poles and early streamer emitter lightning poles [27].

The degradation of solar PV can be affected by temperature, UV, humidity, and mechanical or chemical erosions and electrical stress. Lightning strikes can also degrade solar PV modules. The research in [28] revealed that a small amplitude of the lightning impulse current can degrade PV modules, especially in the absence of LPS. In particular, the metal frame of a solar PV attracts lightning and results in surface discharge when grounded [29].

The risk of the lightning strikes in solar PV systems is a critical issue that must be prevented and addressed because these systems involve high cost investment, profit, and energy stabilities. So far, no proper standard and guideline for LPS design and installation are available. The current LPS guidelines for solar PV farms contain only a few standards and are nonspecific. Therefore, LPS systems in solar PV systems must be improved and comprehensively studied.

Table 2. Standards related to solar PV.

Standards	Title
MS 1837-2010	Installation of Grid-connected Photovoltaic (PV) System
MS IEC 62305 1-4:2007	Protection against lightning Part 1: General Principles Part 2: Risk Management Part 3: Physical damage to structures and life hazard Part 4: Electrical and electronic systems within structures
MS IEC 60364-7-712:2007	Electrical Installations of Building—Part 7-712: Requirements for special installations or locations—Solar Photovoltaic (PV) power supply systems
MS IEC 61836:2010	Solar Photovoltaic Energy System—Terms, Definitions, and Symbols
MS IEC 62446:12	Grid connected photovoltaic systems—Minimum requirements for system documentation, commissioning tests and inspection
MS IEC 61727:2010	Photovoltaic (PV) systems—Characteristics of the utility interface
MS IEC 61730 1-2:2010	Photovoltaic (PV) module safety qualification Part 1: Requirements for construction Part 2: Requirements for testing
MS IEC 60904 1-3:2013	Photovoltaic devices Part 1: Measurement of photovoltaic current-voltage characteristics Part 2: Requirements for reference solar devices Part 3: Measurement principles for terrestrial photovoltaic (PV) solar devices with reference spectral irradiance data
MS IEC 61215:2006	Crystalline silicon terrestrial photovoltaic (PV) modules—design qualification and type approval
MS IEC 61646:2010	Thin-Film terrestrial photovoltaic (PV) modules—Design qualification and type approval
MS IEC 62109-1:2011	Safety of power converters for use in photovoltaic power systems—Part 1: General requirements
IEC 60269-1:2010	Low-voltage fuses—Part 6: Supplementary requirements for fuse-links for the protection of solar photovoltaic energy systems
EN 50380:2003	Datasheet and nameplate information for photovoltaic modules
EN 50539 : 2011	Low-voltage surge protective devices. Surge protective devices for specific application including D.C. Requirements and tests for SPDs in photovoltaic applications
EN 50521:2009-10	Connectors for photovoltaic systems—security requirements and approval (German version EN 50521:2008)
EN 50530:2010	Overall efficiency of grid connected photovoltaic inverters
EN 50548:2009-10	Junction boxes for PV modules

tabulates all the requirements and currently available standards for the installation and protection of solar PV farms.

6. Modelling of a Grid-Connected Solar PV Farm System (Case Studies)

A solar PV farm grid-connected system (1 MW) was modelled in the PSCAD/EMTDC transient software. The model mainly consisted of a solar PV array, inverter (to convert DC to AC), transformer and grid, as shown in Figure 5.

The details of all of the components in the solar PV farm modelled in the PSCAD/EMTDC are tabulated in

Table 3. Details of components in the solar PV farm.

Components	Quantities	Specifications
Solar Modules	4032 modules	60 multicrystalline solar cells
		Power solar PV modules = 250 W
		Voltage of solar PV modules = 29.8 V
		Current of solar PV modules = 8.39 A
Inverter	42	Nominal AC Power per inverter = 20 kW
Sub Distribution Board (SDB)	6	Maximum output aggregated at SDB is 140 kW
Main Distribution Board (MSB)	2	Maximum output aggregated at MSB is 500 kW
Transformer	1	1500 kVA step-up transformer, 433 V/11 kV
Grid	-	11 kV

.

The solar PV farm was formed from 42 PV arrays, each of which delivers a maximum of 24 kW at 1000 W/m² irradiance and 25 °C temperature at standard test conditions (STCs) [30]. Each solar PV array was built from 96 solar PV modules (250 W each) to form a 1 MW solar PV farm grid-connected system. In the simulation, the solar PV farm system generated 0.992 MW, which was equivalent to 99.2% efficiency (Figure 6) and the corresponding time to the steady state is 0.5 s. The remaining percentage (0.8%) was due to losses, which might have been originated from the inverters and cables.

Theoretically, the inverter converted 715.2 V DC from the solar PV array to 353.54 V AC and maintained a unity power factor. The 353.54 V AC was connected to the grid by a 1.5 MVA 433 V/11 kV three-phase coupling transformer. In this simulation, the DC voltage and current output of the solar PV array is shown in Figure 7, while the AC voltage and current output can be seen in Figure 8. The output of the solar PV system is at steady state after 0.4 s.

Table 4. Output of Solar PV Farm Grid-connected System simulated in PSCAD/EMTDC.

DC Output (PV Array)		AC Output
		(PV Array)		(Transformer)
Vmax (V)	Imax (A)	Vmax (V)	Imax (kA)	Vmax (V)	Imax (kA)
714.97	33.42	353.39	0.040	353.45	1.96

summarises the output of the solar PV farm grid-connected system simulated in the PSCAD/EMTDC. The inverter converted the DC voltage to AC voltage using a 120° conductance inverter operation.

In the solar PV farm, the main parts are the solar PV and inverter. Therefore, the lightning strike was applied at the point between these parts for the investigation of the effect of lightning. The striking point of the lightning and measured point location are illustrated in Figure 9.

The lightning strike was initially applied to the solar PV farm grid-connected system without SPD installation to determine the maximum level of transient voltage and current that can cause damage to the solar PV panel and inverter. The effect of lightning was observed throughout the solar PV system even when the striking point was between the solar PV array and inverter. Different amplitudes and waveshapes of lightning impulse current were applied, and all the results were measured and discussed accordingly. In this research, three different lightning current waveshapes were applied (8/20 and 10/350 µs for standard waveshapes test and 0.25/100 µs for nonstandard waveshape).

7. Result and Discussion

When lightning hits a conductor, it produces a travelling wave of voltage and current related to surge impedance at the speed of light. Therefore, five different points of measurement were used after the lightning strike to identify the travelling waves of the transient voltage and current that can cause damage to the components of the solar PV farm grid-connected system. The five points were the following: P1, which was used to determine the transient at solar PV modules; P2 and P3, the transient at the inverter; P4, the transient at the transformer; and P5, the transient at the second inverter.

Table 5. Lightning strike (8/20 µs).

Lightning Amplitude (kA)	P1 (PV Array)		P2 (before Inverter)		P3 (after Inverter)		P4 (before Transformer)		P5 (before Inverter 2)
	Vpv (MV)	Ipv (kA)	Vinv DC (MV)	Iinv DC (kA)	Vinv AC (kV)	Iinv AC (kA)	Vtrans (kV)	Itrans (kA)	Vinv2 (kV)	Iinv2 (kA)
2	0.009	0.024	0.002	2.04	0.13	0.021	0.007	0.188	0.007	0.004
5	0.022	0.401	0.007	4.81	0.32	0.035	0.015	0.203	0.015	0.003
10	0.044	1.34	0.013	8.91	0.64	0.061	0.030	0.23	0.030	0.003
20	0.088	3.31	0.026	17.02	1.27	0.114	0.060	0.29	0.060	0.005
30	0.131	5.31	0.040	25.11	1.91	0.17	0.089	0.34	0.089	0.006
40	0.174	7.32	0.054	33.20	2.55	0.22	0.12	0.39	0.12	0.008
50	0.219	9.33	0.067	41.28	3.18	0.27	0.15	0.44	0.15	0.010
100	0.437	19.42	0.134	81.68	6.37	0.54	0.30	0.67	0.30	0.019
150	0.656	29.52	0.202	122.60	9.55	0.80	0.46	0.89	0.45	0.027
200	0.876	39.63	0.269	162.42	12.73	1.05	0.59	1.10	0.59	0.036

shows the results after the lightning waveshape of 8/20 µs was applied at the point between the solar PV array and inverter at an amplitude range of 2–200 kA.

The results showed that the solar PV modules can be damaged by 5 kA lightning amplitude because the travelling current of 401 A, which greatly exceeded the overcurrent protection level of 71.36 A. The overcurrent protection $I_{TRIP}$ can be calculated using Equation (2), which refers to MS 1837.

$$1.5 \times I_{SC STC MOD}\le I_{TRIP}\le 2\times I_{SC STC MOD}$$

(4)

$$1.5\times 35.68\mathrm{A}\le I_{TRIP}\le 2\times 35.68\mathrm{A}$$

$$53.52\mathrm{A}\le I_{TRIP}\le 2\times 71.36\mathrm{A}$$

High transient voltage (in kilovolts) and transient current (in kiloamperes) were observed at the transformer and inverter PV Array 2. In other words, when a lightning strikes the point between the solar PV array and inverter, the inverter PV Array 2 and transformer might be damaged.

Table 6. Lightning strike (10/350 µs).

Lightning Amplitude (kA)	P1 (PV Array)		P2 (before Inverter)		P3 (after Inverter)		P4 (before Transformer)		P5 (before Inverter 2)
	Vpv (MV)	Ipv (kA)	Vinv DC (MV)	Iinv DC (kA)	Vinv AC (kV)	Iinv AC (kA)	Vtrans (kV)	Itrans (kA)	Vinv2 (kV)	Iinv2 (kA)
2	0.0135	0.024	0.0045	2.04	0.18	0.11	0.050	0.28	0.011	0.005
5	0.033	0.50	0.0113	5.04	0.44	0.24	0.027	0.47	0.027	0.007
10	0.066	1.42	0.023	9.97	0.89	0.47	0.055	0.80	0.055	0.008
20	0.133	3.35	0.045	19.42	1.78	0.94	0.11	1.48	0.11	0.010
30	0.197	5.29	0.068	28.40	2.67	1.40	0.17	2.16	0.17	0.012
40	0.264	7.58	0.091	37.32	3.55	1.87	0.22	2.83	0.22	0.016
50	0.329	9.22	0.113	46.22	4.44	2.33	0.28	3.51	0.28	0.020
100	0.656	19.08	0.227	90.69	8.89	4.67	0.56	6.84	0.56	0.039
150	0.984	28.94	0.340	135.13	13.32	7.01	0.84	10.13	0.84	0.059
200	1.312	38.81	0.454	179.55	17.77	9.35	1.12	13.42	1.12	0.078

illustrates the results for the lightning waveshape of 10/350 µs.

The solar PV modules sustained damage when a 5 kA lightning strike with 10/350 µs waveshape was applied. The lightning strike contributed to the 500 A current detected near the solar PV array. The transformer and inverter of the PV Array 2 were damaged because of the high transient voltage and current.

Table 7. Lightning strike (0.25/100 µs).

Lightning Amplitude (kA)	P1 (PV Array)		P2 (before Inverter)		P3 (after Inverter)		P4 (before Transformer)		P5 (before Inverter 2)
	Vpv (MV)	Ipv (kA)	Vinv DC (MV)	Iinv DC (kA)	Vinv AC (kV)	Iinv AC (kA)	Vtrans (kV)	Itrans (kA)	Vinv2 (kV)	Iinv2 (kA)
2	0.51	0.62	0.022	2.17	0.17	0.072	0.011	0.24	0.019	0.009
5	1.28	1.59	0.054	5.27	0.41	0.16	0.026	0.34	0.026	0.010
10	2.56	3.22	0.108	10.42	0.83	0.32	0.051	0.51	0.051	0.010
20	5.12	6.46	0.217	20.71	1.66	0.62	0.10	0.84	0.10	0.022
30	7.69	9.71	0.325	31.00	2.49	0.92	0.15	1.15	0.15	0.033
40	10.25	12.92	0.434	41.29	3.31	1.21	0.20	1.44	0.20	0.044
50	12.81	16.19	0.542	51.59	4.14	1.51	0.25	1.72	0.25	0.055
100	25.62	32.43	1.085	103.04	8.28	2.96	0.51	3.17	0.51	0.111
150	38.43	48.65	1.627	154.50	12.43	4.41	0.77	4.65	0.77	0.17
200	51.24	64.88	2.170	205.96	16.57	5.86	1.02	6.13	1.02	0.22

tabulates the results for the lightning strike with 0.25/100 µs waveshape.

The lightning strike with 0.25/100 µs waveshape also damaged the solar PV modules, inverter PV Array 1, inverter PV Array 2 and transformer. The consequences of damage were the same as those observed after the application of lightning strike with 10/350 µs waveshape. The only difference between them is that the transient current and voltage measured at lightning strike with 0.25/100 µs waveshape were much higher than those at lightning strike with 10/350 µs waveshape.

Travelling voltage and current were generated along the conductor line after the lightning struck the solar PV farm. Each measured point was illustrated in a graph based on the lightning strike at 200 kA peak current with 0.25/100 µs lightning waveform. Figure 10 shows the transient voltage (51.24 MV) and current (64.88 kA) that appears at the solar PV Array 1.

Figure 11a shows the transient voltage and current detected before entering the inverter (DC output). Figure 11b shows the transient voltage and current after leaving the inverter (AC output). The transient peak current at P2 is 205.96 kA; 1.03% over the peak current of the lightning strike, while at P3 was 5.86 kA. The AC output shows at least one phase will be affected by the lightning stroke.

Figure 12 and Figure 13 illustrate the transient voltage and current at the transformer and inverter PV Array 2. Although the lightning strike was at the point between the solar PV Array 1 and inverter, the transient voltage and current might have damaged the transformer and inverter PV Array 2 due to generated travelling waves throughout the system.

Based on these results, one can clearly see how the lightning surge can cause damage to the solar PV array and inverter that obviously lead to the high cost of replacement. Different behaviours can be seen from the perspectives of voltage and current measured at the solar panel, before and after inverter and at the main panel that connected to the grid. Those tables provide information and quick justification on where to install the SPD and what are the ratings of the SPD to be considered which duly fit the purpose of this study.

8. Conclusions

A lightning strike produces high transient voltage and current that can severely damage solar PV modules and components, such as inverters. A lightning current with short tail time and high peak contributes to a considerable increase in transient current and voltage. Furthermore, although lightning was injected between the solar PV and inverter, the transient voltage and current were able to travel along the conductor and caused damage to other components, particularly the solar PV modules and inverters. Therefore, depending on the location of the solar PV farm, engineers can obtain information on the peak current and median current of the site from the lightning location system (LLS) and utilise the results obtained in this study to appropriately assign an SPD to protect the solar panel, inverter and the main panel that connects to the grid. This paper does not propose the exact rating of the SPD to be used, due to the fact that there are different requirements of each side, but rather to provide a feasibility study prior to the commissioning of the system. Therefore, it is our aim for this lightning surge analysis to be adopted and carried out by the authority, as part of the compulsory task, before the system can be energised.